Latest News
- Supreme Court rules Trump can end protections for Haitians and Syrians
- Plane battling wildfire crashes in Northwest Territories with three aboard
- Supreme Court invalidates Hawaii law on guns in publicly accessible private property
- Spyware firm Intellexa linked to journalist hacking in talks with UK officials
- Diver confirmed dead and another missing after cliff collapse in Biarritz
- Eylon Levy asserts Israeli campaign enables Lebanon to challenge Hezbollah
- Russia Launches Fresh Missile Strikes Against Ukraine Amid Conflict Escalation
- Powerful earthquakes in Venezuela leave dozens dead and hundreds injured
Six family members heading back from Fossil Rim Wildlife Center in Texas were killed in a head-on crash with a teen driver.
Apple will source most iPhones from India and iPads from Vietnam to avoid the effects of tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, aiming to maintain consumer prices in the US.
January 22, 2024
6:58 pm
If you ever come across Dame Joanna Lumley, do not do this… (Picture: Daniel Loveday/Comic Relief/Getty Images)
Dame Joanna Lumley dubbed it ‘creepy’ when fans take secret photographs of her.
The Absolutely Fabulous star, 77, is always happy to get a picture with a passer-by – as long as she knows about it.
What she can’t stand is when people film or take pictures of her without her permission.
She also has a brilliant reaction when she notices people doing just that.
‘I never mind doing photographs with people, but what I don’t like is when they steal them,’ she explained to Sky News.
‘They don’t ask, you can just see them quietly at a dinner table, going like that [gestures taking a photo] across the restaurant.
Dame Joanna doesn’t like it when fans take secret photos of her (Picture: Hoda Davaine/Dave Benett/Getty Images)
She’s more than happy to pose with fans if they ask (Picture: Victoria Jones-Pool/Getty Images)
‘I walk over and say, “Shall we do a proper picture?” And they get a bit flustered and say, “Oh, I didn’t want to disturb you,” you know? But that’s creepy.’
Dame Joanna finds the constant use of cameras on phones ‘intrusive’ and said it gives her the feeling everyone is being watched to some extent nowadays.
But it’s not just fans this certified national treasure has a problem with in this respect – she doesn’t even like supermarket CCTV cameras.
‘There’s a feeling of being watched, if you’re in a room where there’s a camera – you know you’re being watched… it’s odd,’ she explained.
Dame Joanna is stars in the hit Netflix show of the moment, Fool Me Once, alongside Michelle Keegan.
The Harlan Coben thriller follows Maya Stern (Michelle) as she tries to come to terms with her husband Joe’s murder.
Enter mother-in-law Judith Burkett, who is expertly portrayed by Dame Joanna with her trademark wit and feisty character.
Dame Joanna stars in Netflix’s Fool Me Once alongside Michelle Keegan (Picture: ishal Sharma/Netflix)
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video
The thriller also stars Utopia actor Adeel Akhtar, the BBC’s His Dark Materials actress Jade Anouka, and The Hobbit trilogy star Richard Armitage.
Judith and Maya have a fractured relationship in the series, and Coronation Street star Michelle previously said it was difficult saying some of her lines to such an iconic actor as Dame Joanna.
Speaking on The One Show, Admitted admitted she dreaded having to fire expletives at Dame Joanna, as she said: ‘Honestly, when I read the script, I was like, “Oh no, oh no!”‘
‘We had a bit of a laugh, didn’t we, when we were rehearsing? I don’t think I said it when we were in rehearsals, I was like, “I can’t! I can’t!”‘
Dame Joanna admitted it was a shock, as she added: ‘When it’s not used very often, bad language comes… it slaps out of the screen at you, it does.’
Got a story?
If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.
MORE : Dame Joanna Lumley keen to land a role in The White Lotus after watching Jennifer Coolidge
MORE : Dame Joanna Lumley still writes love letters to husband of 37 years – and we’re gone
She’s spoken, people.
Very sad to hear that Wendy Williams has been diagnosed with Frontotemporal dementia, the same condition Bruce Willis suffers from. Appeared on her show many times over the years and she’s a fabulous character & superb broadcaster. Wish her and her family all the best.
Islamophobia is rampant in the Tories, as both Lee Anderson as the unsuspended Suella Braverman underline.
So why hasn’t there been an EHRC investigation? This really does tell you everything you need to know!
Palestinians are human beings who deserve to live in freedom and joy.
That is why hundreds of thousands of us have exercised our right to protest.
We will be here as long as it takes until there is an immediate ceasefire, an end to the occupation, and a just & lasting peace.
Six family members returning from safari killed in head-on crash with teen driver
Six family members heading back from Fossil Rim Wildlife Center in Texas were killed in a head-on crash with a teen driver.
December 28, 2023
Nvidia profit bonanza drives global rally as stock markets ride AI wave
February 23, 2024
11:14 am
King Charles to appear on UK bank notes from June
February 23, 2024
5:27 am
‘A tremendous honour’ – Andy Farrell named as British and Irish Lions head coach for Australia series
He will lead the side Down Under in 2025.
News Desk
January 11, 2024
Warren Buffett admits Berkshire’s days of ‘eye popping gains’ are over
The Tech Titan Who Led His Company From a 68-Square-Foot Jail Cell
July 3, 2025
2:48 pm
Cliff Notes – Liverpool forward Diogo Jota, brother die in car crash – Spanish Civil Guard
- Diogo Jota, 28, and his brother André Silva, 25, were killed in a car crash near Zamora, Spain, with police investigating potential causes, including a blown tyre.
- Liverpool FC and the Portuguese Football Federation confirmed the tragic news, expressing their condolences and requesting privacy for the families involved.
Liverpool forward Diogo Jota, brother die in car crash – Spanish Civil Guard
Liverpool and Portugal forward Diogo Jota and his brother, André Silva, were killed in a car crash near Zamora, Spain, police said Thursday.
Liverpool FC, the Portuguese Prime Minister Luís Montenegro and Portuguese Football Federation (FPF) also confirmed the incident.
The Spanish Civil Guard confirmed to The Associated Press that Jota and his brother were found dead after their car went off a road on an isolated stretch of highway about an hour west of Zamora. Authorities said the car, a Lamborghini, according to police was in flames.
Firefighters were called in as the fire spread to nearby vegetation, authorities said.
Police were investigating the causes of the crash
Police were investigating the causes of the crash, which happened past midnight local time. They said there were no other vehicles involved. The bodies were undergoing forensic analysis.
It wasn’t clear who was driving the car. Police were looking into the hypothesis that the crash happened because of a blown tire.
Jota, who was 28, and his brother, who was 25, were both Portuguese players and the only ones in the car, police said.
Jota’s death comes weeks after he married Rute Cardoso and in a social media post wrote, “Yes to forever.” They have three children, the youngest born last year.
Diogo Jota made 182 appearances for Liverpool in five years at the club
A Civil Guard spokesperson told EU News that they believe the driver lost control of the car after a tire blew out.
The Spanish Civil Guard is one of the two national law enforcement agencies of Spain. They are a separate organisation from the police.
Jota, whose full name was Diogo José Teixeira da Silva, made 182 appearances for Liverpool since joining from Wolves in 2020. He lifted the Premier League title in May, having previously won the FA Cup and two Carabao Cups in his five years at the club.
Silva played with Portuguese club Penafiel in the lower divisions.
“Liverpool Football Club are devastated by the tragic passing of Diogo Jota,” the club said in a statement.
“Liverpool FC will be making no further comment at this time and request the privacy of Diogo and André’s family, friends, teammates and club staff is respected as they try to come to terms with an unimaginable loss.
“We will continue to provide them with our full support.”
The club also lowered its flag to half mast.
Tributes were laid at Anfield for Diogo Jota and his brother, André Silva
UEFA said its thoughts were with relatives, friends and teammates affected “by this heartbreaking loss.” It said a moment of silence will be observed at Euro 2025 matches on Thursday and Friday.
Jota began his career at Portuguese side Paços de Ferreira and also played at Atlético Madrid and FC Porto.
Jota also won 49 international caps for Portugal, during which he won the UEFA Nations League in 2019 and again last month, scoring 14 goals.
The FPF said in a statement: “The Portuguese Football Federation and the entire Portuguese football community are devastated by the deaths of Diogo Jota and André Silva in Spain this morning.
“Diogo Jota was not only a fantastic player with almost 50 caps for the national team, but also an extraordinary person who was respected by all his teammates and opponents. He had a contagious joy and was a reference point in his own community.
Diogo Jota married his longtime partner, Rute Cardoso, in a ceremony on June 22
“The Portuguese Football Federation would like to offer the deepest condolences to the families and friends of Diogo and André, as well as Liverpool FC and FC Penafiel, the respective clubs of the players.
“The Portuguese Football Federation has asked UEFA to hold a minute’s silence ahead of our national team’s match against Spain in the Women’s European Championship on Thursday.
“We have lost two champions. Their deaths represent irreparable losses for Portuguese football, and we will do everything we can to honour their legacy every day.”
The Liga Portugal and Atlético Madrid also paid tribute to the two players
Jota’s Portugal teammate, Cristiano Ronaldo, sent his condolences to the brothers’ family.
“It doesn’t make sense. We were just together with the national team, you had just gotten married,” Ronaldo wrote in Portuguese in a post on social media.
“To your family, your wife, and your children, I send my condolences and wish them all the strength in the world. I know you will always be with them. Rest in peace, Diogo and André. We will all miss you.”
Arguably the best tribute came from his former Liverpool teammate and Brazilian legend Roberto Firmino on Instagram whilst posting a carrousel of pictures for the duos relationship and partnership. Naming the children and family personally, was a special touch.
“When words fail, there are only inexpressible groans. And for that reason I get on my knees, praying that the Holy Spirit comforts the heart of Rute, Dinis, Duarte, Mafalda, Seu Joaquim, Lady Isabel and all the family and friends.
It was a privilege and an honor to have known and lived such special moments alongside you. Rest in Peace to my brother Jota, and Andre.”
June 25, 2026
10:00 pm
Media Lens: Supreme Court rules Trump can end protections for Haitians and Syrians
Supreme Court ends legal protections for Haitians and Syrians.
The Supreme Court has granted the Trump administration the authority to end legal protections for Haitians and Syrians. This decision is significant within the context of ongoing U.S. immigration policies, according to coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.
What happened
The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to end legal protections for Haitians and Syrians under the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. This ruling grants the administration significant authority over immigration policies affecting these groups.
Key facts
- The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to end legal protections for Haitians and Syrians.
- This decision was confirmed in a ruling that emphasizes the administration’s authority over immigration policies.
- The ruling was reported by multiple news outlets including AP News and CNN.
- The legal context involved the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program.
- The ruling has been described as a significant victory for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda.
Where coverage differs
- AP News emphasizes the legal implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling, while CNN emphasizes the political ramifications related to Trump’s immigration agenda.
- The New York Times foregrounds the racial considerations in the deportation cases rather than the broader legal context.
- NPR prioritizes the administrative accountability aspects of the Supreme Court’s decision over the personal impacts on affected communities.
One story, four angles
AP News – The Supreme Court lets the Trump administration end legal protections for Haitians and Syrians
Publication: AP News | Primary framing pattern: Legal | Tone: Informative | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: AP News straightforwardly reports on the Supreme Court’s decision allowing the Trump administration to terminate legal protections for Haitian and Syrian immigrants. The article presents the ruling as a significant legal development without emotional persuasion.
Publication emphasis: The article emphasizes the legal authority of the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Framing analysis: The article foregrounds the legal ramifications of the decision while secondary factors, such as personal stories of affected individuals, are less prominently featured.
Bias: Selection: Focus on legal aspects of the ruling Language: Objective and formal Omission: Limited personal narrative or community perspective
Assessment: AP News maintains a professional tone while conveying the essentials of the Supreme Court’s ruling.
CNN – Takeaways: Supreme Court hands Trump massive wins on immigration agenda
Publication: CNN | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Analytical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: Critical | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: CNN analyzes the Supreme Court’s ruling as a major political victory for the Trump administration, emphasizing how it aligns with his immigration agenda. The article presents implications for future policy changes and public sentiment around immigration.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the political consequences and implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Framing analysis: Foregrounds the political impact of the ruling while secondary discussions on legal nuances occur less prominently.
Bias: Selection: Concentration on Trump’s agenda and its implications Language: Strong and evocative Omission: Less coverage of legal precedents
Assessment: CNN’s analysis provides a sharp critique of the ruling within the broader political context, making it accessible to a general audience.
The New York Times – Justices Clash on Whether Race Played a Role in Trump’s Bid to Deport Haitians
Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: Moral | Tone: Inquisitive | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: Concerned | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The New York Times explores deeper ethical questions surrounding the Supreme Court’s decision, focusing on the racial implications of Trump’s deportation policies. The analysis exposes divisions among justices regarding the motivations behind immigration policies.
Publication emphasis: The article emphasizes moral considerations around race and justice in the context of immigration law.
Framing analysis: Foregrounds the moral implications while legal details and bureaucratic processes receive less immediate attention.
Bias: Selection: Focus on racial justice implications Language: Reflective and critical Omission: Less emphasis on purely legal arguments
Assessment: The New York Times effectively provokes critical thinking around the ethical dimensions of immigration law, contributing to a rich discourse.
NPR – Supreme Court rules that Trump has virtually unchecked power to end TPS program
Publication: NPR | Primary framing pattern: Consequence | Tone: Reflective | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: Alarmed | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: NPR discusses the Supreme Court’s ruling, underscoring the far-reaching consequences of ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS). The piece reflects on future challenges for impacted communities and poses questions about the broader implications for immigration policy.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the potential outcomes and societal impacts of the Supreme Court’s decision.
Framing analysis: Foregrounds the consequences for impacted populations while legal analyses are presented as secondary.
Bias: Selection: Concentration on community outcomes Language: Cautionary and empathetic Omission: May overlook technical legal arguments in favor of human stories
Assessment: NPR successfully highlights the human implications of the ruling, driving a message that resonates with public concern.
Food for thought
AP News provides the strongest legal framing, highlighting the Supreme Court’s decision to allow the Trump administration to end temporary protections for Haitians and Syrians, emphasizing the judicial endorsement of executive immigration authority. In contrast, CNN’s coverage takes a more escalatory tone, framing the ruling as a major victory for Trump’s immigration agenda, hinting at potential socio-political ramifications. Meanwhile, NPR discusses the ruling in terms of expansive presidential power, indicating a shift in legal standards for immigrant protections, while The New York Times probes the racial implications, reflecting rising tensions in immigration policy debates. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
What to Watch
Amazon prime - TV & Netflix
We give you the best picks to binge on this week.
What to Watch
Love Sports
Get your pizza ordered with the latest Live Sports schedule.
What’s happening?
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can end legal protections for Haitian and Syrian immigrants, a decision that impacts numerous individuals who have relied on Temporary Protected Status (TPS). The ruling affirms the administration’s authority in immigration matters, allowing it to proceed with deportations.
Two contrasting headlines from different media outlets illustrate varying perspectives on the court’s decision: “The Supreme Court lets the Trump administration end legal protections for Haitians and Syrians” from AP News emphasizes the procedural aspect of the ruling, focusing on the court’s acceptance of the administration’s authority. In contrast, CNN’s “Takeaways: Supreme Court hands Trump massive wins on immigration agenda” frames the decision as a significant victory for Trump’s immigration policy, suggesting a broader impact on the administration’s agenda. This distinction highlights a divergence in framing—one focuses on the judicial process, while the other emphasizes the potential consequences of the ruling.
Awesome
-
7
© 2026 WTX News.