A history of American political scandals that have shaped American politics as it is today. Resourced and researched through American freedom of information act and with Political History Majors and Professors from Columbia university.
Sections
The US Senate – Power, Pride, and Democracy
A History of American Political Scandals – Since 1776
Westminster Whispers
House of Representatives – The lower House
Yvonne Ridley’s UK Political podcasts | Subscribe NOW
What is a News Briefing
News Briefing – Freedom from bias
Review for restaurants | Boost your restaurant reviews on google | Influencer Special offer
Search for content ...
Topics
The Watergate Scandal Explained: What Really Happened?
An exploration of the Watergate scandal -one of the biggest American political scandals of the 20th century – its causes, and how it reshaped the American political system.
Watergate Scandal Summary
- Break-in: On June 17, 1972, five men were caught breaking into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C.
- Nixon Connection: Investigations revealed ties between the burglars and President Richard Nixon’s re-election campaign.
- Cover-up: Nixon and his administration attempted to hide their involvement by obstructing the investigation, including paying hush money and destroying evidence.
- Secret Tapes: Nixon recorded conversations in the Oval Office. When subpoenaed, he initially refused to release them, leading to a legal battle.
- Smoking Gun Tape: A released tape proved Nixon ordered the cover-up, confirming his involvement.
- Resignation: Facing impeachment, Nixon resigned on August 8, 1974, the only U.S. president to do so.
- Aftermath: Several Nixon aides were convicted, and the scandal led to increased scrutiny of government actions and reforms in campaign finance and transparency.
The Watergate Scandal Explained
The Watergate scandal was a major political controversy in the United States during the early 1970s that ultimately led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon. The scandal began with a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate Office Building in Washington, D.C., on June 17, 1972. Five men were arrested during the break-in, and it was soon discovered that they were connected to Nixon’s reelection campaign, known as the Committee to Re-Elect the President (CREEP). The men had been attempting to wiretap phones and steal documents, but the incident was only the beginning of a broader pattern of corruption.
To this day, the suffix “-gate” is often used to describe other political scandals.
Following the break-in, members of Nixon’s administration attempted to cover up their involvement. They engaged in various illegal activities, such as obstructing investigations, paying hush money to the burglars, and using government agencies to harass political opponents. President Nixon himself became implicated when it was revealed that he had participated in efforts to conceal the administration’s role in the break-in. The cover-up unravelled as investigative journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein from The Washington Post uncovered crucial details about the scandal, with assistance from an anonymous source known as Deep Throat (later revealed to be FBI Associate Director Mark Felt). Congressional hearings, led by Senator Sam Ervin, brought the scandal into the public spotlight.
Watergate Smoking Gun Tapes
A major turning point came with the discovery of Nixon’s secret White House tape-recording system, which contained evidence of his involvement in obstructing justice. A tape from June 23, 1972, became known as the “smoking gun” because it revealed Nixon’s direct attempts to interfere with the FBI’s investigation. This revelation caused Nixon to lose political support, and with impeachment looming, he chose to resign on August 8, 1974, becoming the first U.S. president to do so. He left office the following day, and Vice President Gerald Ford succeeded him.
In the aftermath of Watergate, many of Nixon’s aides and associates were convicted of crimes, including White House Counsel John Dean and Attorney General John Mitchell. President Ford later pardoned Nixon on September 8, 1974, preventing him from facing criminal charges. The scandal had a lasting impact on American politics, leading to reforms such as the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 and changes to campaign finance laws. Watergate significantly eroded public trust in government and became a symbol of political corruption.
Common FAQs
What is the Watergate scandal in simple terms?
It revolved around members of a group associated with Nixon’s 1972 re-election campaign breaking into and planting listening devices in the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate Office Building.
What was found in the Watergate scandal?
The arrest and eventual conviction or guilty pleas of the five men uncovered a series of wiretaps, slush funds, political sabotage, unjustified firings, and even kidnapping, all in an attempt to re-elect the president.
What exactly did Richard Nixon do?
Reduction of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, détente with the Soviet Union and China, the Moon landing, and the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency and Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
The Role of the Media in Exposing Corruption & Political Scandals
How investigative journalism shaped the course of American political scandals, from Watergate to the Trump-Russia investigation, the media has played a crucial role in bringing corruption and scandals to the public’s attention.
- Investigative journalism has uncovered many American political scandals
- From the groundbreaking Watergate to Bill Clinton’s affair with a White House intern
- Whistleblowers are key in helping the media expose corruption
The Role of the Media in Exposing Corruption
Investigative journalism has played a pivotal role in uncovering and shaping the course of political scandals in the United States, from the groundbreaking reporting on Watergate in the 1970s to the detailed investigations into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential election. In each case, journalists exposed critical information that not only brought issues of corruption and misconduct to light but also influenced public opinion, governmental actions, and the broader political landscape.
The impact of investigative journalism was most famously demonstrated during the Watergate scandal. Reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post worked tirelessly to uncover the connections between the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters and President Richard Nixon’s administration. Watergate cemented investigative journalism as a crucial tool for holding those in power accountable.
Decades later, the importance of investigative journalism was evident during the Trump-Russia investigation, which scrutinised allegations that members of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign colluded with Russian operatives to influence the election. News organisations such as The New York Times and The Washington Post published a series of exposés that detailed connections between campaign officials and Russian entities, as well as efforts to obstruct subsequent investigations. These reports prompted the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, whose investigation examined these allegations and uncovered evidence of Russian interference in the election. While Mueller’s report did not conclude that Trump’s campaign conspired with Russia, it documented numerous instances of questionable behaviour and potential obstruction of justice, shaping public discourse and fueling the partisan debate.
Investigative journalism in politics
Between these two major scandals, investigative journalism also played critical roles in uncovering numerous other instances of misconduct, including the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s, the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal in the 1990s, and the exposure of government surveillance programs by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013. In each case, journalists revealed details that were initially hidden from the public, sparking debates about ethics, transparency, and accountability in government.
The broader implications of investigative journalism in political scandals extend beyond the events themselves. The success of reporters in uncovering wrongdoing has led to significant changes in how the media operates and how political figures are scrutinized. The rise of 24-hour news cycles and digital platforms has intensified the speed and scope of reporting, though it has also raised concerns about sensationalism and partisanship. Moreover, political leaders have become increasingly wary of journalists, sometimes attacking the media to undermine credibility, as seen during Trump’s presidency with frequent accusations of “fake news.”Despite challenges, investigative journalism remains a cornerstone of democracy, empowering the public with information and serving as a check on those in power.
Common FAQs
How media plays an important role in politics?
The media’s primary duty is to present us with information and alert us with important events that occur. This information may affect what we think and the actions we take. The media can also pressure the government to act by signaling a need for intervention or showing that citizens can change.
What is the role of media in shaping public opinion?
Media plays a crucial role in influencing people’s perceptions and behaviors by disseminating information, raising awareness, and providing education. It facilitates communication among individuals and enables them to gain insights into various global, social, and environmental concerns.
What is the role of investigative journalism?
Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, racial injustice, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing. An investigative journalist may spend months or years researching and preparing a report.
How does the media work to set the political agenda?
The agenda-setting by media is driven by the media’s bias on things such as politics, economy and culture, etc. Audiences consider an issue to be more significant the more media attention it receives (issue saliency).
How do Presidential scandals impact the country’s elections?
How American political scandals have influenced the outcomes of presidential and congressional elections over the years. From the first major American scandals to the modern day, some scandals barely make an impact on the voter whilst others can cost the party the election.
How do Presidential scandals impact the country’s elections?
- Corrupt Bargain of 1824 was one of the first example of scandals impacting elections
- The Teapot Dome scandal eroded public confidence in the Republican Party
- The Watergate Scandal led to political reforms
- The Clinton scandal impacted the party but did not stop impact the midterm elections
Political scandals in the United States have had a profound influence on the outcomes of presidential and congressional elections, often reshaping voter perceptions, political dynamics, and the balance of power in government. Scandals have frequently served as turning points, either galvanizing opposition to incumbents or eroding public trust in specific political figures and parties. From the 19th century to the modern era, these episodes have underscored the critical role of accountability in American democracy.
One of the earliest examples of a political scandal impacting elections was the Corrupt Bargain of 1824, which tarnished the legitimacy of John Quincy Adams’s presidency and fueled the rise of Andrew Jackson as a populist leader. Jackson’s supporters capitalized on public outrage over what they perceived as backroom dealings, leading to his decisive victory in the 1828 election and the emergence of the modern Democratic Party. The episode demonstrated how scandals could mobilize discontent and realign political alliances.
Teapot Dome Scandal Contributed to Democratic Gains
In the 20th century, the Teapot Dome scandal of the 1920s highlighted the vulnerabilities of the political system to corruption. This bribery scandal, involving the secret leasing of federal oil reserves by members of President Warren G. Harding’s administration, eroded public confidence in the Republican Party. Although Harding died before the full extent of the scandal became public, the fallout contributed to significant Democratic gains in subsequent elections and prompted reforms to enhance government accountability.
The Watergate scandal in the 1970s marked a watershed moment in U.S. political history, with far-reaching electoral consequences. The revelation of illegal activities and a cover-up orchestrated by members of President Richard Nixon’s administration led to Nixon’s resignation in 1974. In the aftermath, public disillusionment with the Republican Party contributed to Democratic landslides in the 1974 midterm elections. Watergate also heightened scrutiny of political campaigns, leading to reforms such as the Federal Election Campaign Act to improve transparency and accountability in campaign finance.
Teapot Dome was a political scandal that took place in 1921 to 1922. The name comes from an oil reserve near Teapot Rock, Wyoming. President Warren G. Harding let the reserve and another reserve in California, be under the control of the Department of the Interior.
Clinton Scandal Did Not Negatively Impact Voting
Scandals have also played critical roles in more recent elections. The Monica Lewinsky affair in the 1990s and the subsequent impeachment of President Bill Clinton created deep partisan divisions but did not prevent Clinton’s Democratic Party from performing well in the 1998 midterms. This marked the first time since 1822 that the president’s party gained seats in a midterm election during a second term, underscoring how public fatigue with political overreach can sometimes backfire on opponents of the scandalized leader.
The Trump-Russia investigation and allegations of misconduct during Donald Trump’s presidency were central to both the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential election. The investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump’s subsequent impeachment trials polarized voters and energized Democratic turnout, contributing to the party’s victory in retaking the House of Representatives in 2018. Similarly, the scandals surrounding Trump’s administration became focal points in Joe Biden’s successful 2020 campaign, which emphasized themes of restoring integrity and stability to the presidency.
Scandals At Congressional Level
At the congressional level, scandals involving individual lawmakers have also significantly influenced electoral outcomes. For example, ethical and financial misconduct charges have led to the downfall of prominent figures, such as Senator Ted Stevens in 2008, whose corruption charges contributed to his defeat in a tight race, helping Democrats secure a larger Senate majority.
Beyond individual elections, political scandals have driven long-term changes in voter behaviour and party strategies. They have exposed vulnerabilities in institutional systems and contributed to calls for electoral reform, campaign finance regulation, and greater transparency in government. Scandals have also heightened the stakes of political competition, with parties often weaponizing allegations of misconduct to rally their bases and undermine opponents.
U.S. political scandals have consistently shaped the course of presidential and congressional elections, reflecting the dynamic interplay between public accountability, political narratives, and voter sentiment.
Common FAQs
Craziest presidential elections
Some of the craziest U.S. presidential elections include 1800, when Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr tied, requiring 36 House votes to resolve; 1824, when John Quincy Adams won despite losing the popular and electoral votes due to a “corrupt bargain”.
Most controversial presidential elections
Some of the most controversial U.S. presidential elections include 1824 when John Quincy Adams won in the House of Representatives despite Andrew Jackson having the most popular and electoral votes.
What was the Teapot Dome scandal in simple terms?
It centered on Interior Secretary Albert Bacon Fall, who had leased Navy petroleum reserves at Teapot Dome in Wyoming, as well as two locations in California, to private oil companies at low rates without competitive bidding.
Modern Political Scandals: From Donald Trump to the #MeToo Movement
How modern political scandals shape the political discourse in the United States. A look at Trump’s impeachment to sexual harassment allegations.
- Modern political scandals major role in deepening partisan polarization
- Partisan framing influences how scandals are perceived by the public
- Modern scandals also serve as flashpoints for broader societal and cultural debates
Modern Political Scandals
Modern American political scandals have become defining moments in shaping political discourse, exposing tensions within institutions, influencing public perceptions, and reshaping debates on accountability, ethics, and governance. Unlike earlier scandals that often revolved around isolated acts of corruption or personal misconduct, contemporary scandals are more deeply intertwined with partisan divides, cultural shifts, and media dynamics. These scandals not only dominate headlines but also frame how Americans engage with their political system and leaders.
The Rise of Partisan Polarization – Impeachments of Donald Trump
One of the most significant features of modern political scandals is their role in deepening partisan polarization. The impeachments of Donald Trump, for example, were emblematic of how scandals are increasingly viewed through a partisan lens. The first impeachment in 2019 centered on Trump’s alleged efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate political rival Joe Biden, while the second, in 2021, followed the January 6 Capitol riot and accusations of inciting insurrection. In both cases, public and congressional reactions largely followed party lines, with Democrats framing Trump’s actions as existential threats to democracy and Republicans rallying around him, portraying the proceedings as partisan witch hunts.
This partisan framing influences how scandals are perceived by the public. Instead of fostering broad consensus on ethical norms or legal standards, scandals often reinforce existing loyalties. Supporters of the accused may dismiss allegations as politically motivated, while opponents use the events to energize their base. This dynamic has contributed to a climate where scandals are less about addressing misconduct and more about scoring political points, making meaningful bipartisan accountability increasingly rare.
Beginning in late 2020, Cuomo faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct.
An investigation commissioned by New York Attorney General Letitia James reported in August 2021 that Cuomo sexually harassed at least eleven women during his time in office, for which Cuomo faced criminal investigations, however she declined to file criminal charges against him.
Scandals as Cultural Reckonings – #MeToo movement
Modern scandals also serve as flashpoints for broader societal and cultural debates, often transcending individual wrongdoing to reflect systemic issues. The #MeToo movement, for instance, brought sexual harassment and abuse into the political spotlight, implicating figures like Senator Al Franken, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Governor Andrew Cuomo. These cases underscored the pervasive nature of gendered power imbalances in politics and sparked widespread conversations about workplace ethics, consent, and accountability.
While the movement led to tangible consequences for some political figures, it also revealed tensions around due process and political opportunism. Allegations of misconduct became battlegrounds for cultural and partisan disputes, as supporters and detractors of accused individuals debated not just the specifics of each case but also the broader implications for societal change. This dual focus on individual accountability and systemic reform has made scandals like those arising from #MeToo emblematic of how modern controversies reflect larger cultural shifts.
Role of Media In Shaping Impact of Scandal – the rise of social media
The role of media—both traditional outlets and social media platforms—has fundamentally reshaped the impact of political scandals. Investigative journalism remains a cornerstone of exposing misconduct, as seen in the Watergate-era reporting that set a gold standard for accountability. In modern times, similar efforts uncovered the financial improprieties of New York Congressman George Santos and the abuse of political power in Trump’s Ukraine dealings.
However, the rise of social media has added a new dimension to scandal discourse, accelerating the speed at which controversies spread and allowing individuals to bypass traditional gatekeepers. Politicians like Trump have leveraged platforms like Twitter to reframe allegations against them as partisan attacks, mobilizing their supporters and dismissing critical coverage as “fake news.” This direct-to-audience approach reduces the ability of traditional institutions to shape the narrative and contributes to an environment where scandals are debated in echo chambers rather than across a shared national conversation.
Political Scandals Increasingly Weaponized
Political scandals are increasingly weaponized as tools to discredit opponents and gain strategic advantages. During the 2016 presidential election, for example, revelations about Hillary Clinton’s private email server dominated headlines, with Republicans using the controversy to undermine trust in her judgment and qualifications. Simultaneously, the Trump-Russia investigation became a rallying cry for Democrats, who viewed it as evidence of foreign interference and executive misconduct.
This weaponization of scandals contributes to an erosion of trust in political institutions. When voters perceive investigations or accusations as partisan maneuvers rather than genuine efforts to uphold accountability, they may become cynical about the integrity of the system. This skepticism can reduce voter engagement and deepen the divide between citizens and their government.
Modern Scandals Shaping Political Discourse
Modern scandals profoundly shape the national conversation by defining the terms of debate and setting the political agenda. Scandals like those surrounding Donald Trump, the #MeToo movement, or even financial controversies like the Panama Papers highlight key issues such as executive overreach, gender equity, and economic transparency. By bringing these topics into the public sphere, scandals can drive legislative reforms, shift voter priorities, and redefine what is considered acceptable behavior in public office.
At the same time, the partisan and media-driven nature of modern scandals can make meaningful resolution difficult. Public discourse often becomes polarized and reactive, focused more on assigning blame than on addressing underlying issues. This dynamic has made scandals both a catalyst for important conversations and a source of division, reflecting the complexities of accountability in a highly polarized and media-saturated era.
Accountability In Democracy
Ultimately, modern scandals underscore the dual role of accountability in democracy: as both a necessary mechanism for preserving trust and a contested terrain in the ongoing struggle for political power.
Common FAQs
What is the purpose of the MeToo movement?
The ‘me too. ‘ Movement believes in the radical possibilities of a movement against sexual violence, led by survivors of sexual violence. When survivors channel their unique empathy in community with one another, and in service of a future free from sexual violence, that’s when change happens.
Donald Trump first impeachment
Donald Trump, serving as the 45th president of the United States, was impeached for the first time on December 18, 2019. On that date, the House of Representatives adopted two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
Trump second impeachment
Donald Trump, serving as the 45th president of the United States, was impeached for the second time on January 13, 2021, one week before his term expired. On that date, the House of Representatives adopted one article of impeachment against Trump: incitement of insurrection. On February 13, 2021, the Senate voted to acquit Trump on the article of impeachment.
The Corrupt Bargain of 1824: America’s First Major Political Scandal
A detailed and focused look at the Corrupt Bargain of 1824, exploring the consequences and impact of what is widely considered America’s first major political scandal. Asking probing questions and discovering about the evolution of corruption in american politics.
Summary of the facts
The US presidential election of 1824 had four candidates:
- John Quincy Adams
- Andrew Jackson
- William Crawford
- Henry Clay
The Corrupt Bargain formed the foundation of political backroom deals that would significantly yield power from the electorate and put in the hands of people of influence. The outcry from this election resonated for decades, but its legacy of corruption has lived on for centuries.
The winner of the 12th Amendment, John Quincy Adams, would serve as the 6th President of the United States and Henry Clay, the deal maker, would serve as The Secretary of State, the second most powerful position in the country.
The Corrupt Bargain of 1824
The Corrupt Bargain of 1824 was a pivotal moment in U.S. political history that reshaped the landscape of presidential elections and fueled long-lasting political tensions. The term refers to the contentious presidential election of 1824, in which no candidate secured a majority of electoral votes, forcing the House of Representatives to decide the outcome.
The eventual selection of John Quincy Adams as president, amid accusations of political deal-making, had profound consequences for American politics and significantly influenced future elections.
America’s First Major Political Scandal
The election of 1824 featured four major candidates: Andrew Jackson (A lawyer and general in the U.S. Army), John Quincy Adams (An Independent thinker), William Crawford ( A Judge and a Senator), and Henry Clay (the Deal maker who went on to make an alliance with the British).
Andrew Jackson had emerged as the clear leader in both the popular vote and the Electoral College, but he fell short of the majority required to win outright. At the time, it would have been very likely the next president as it would have been the right thing to do.
What happened after the electoral stalemate
Under the terms of the Twelfth Amendment, the decision moved to the House of Representatives, where the top three candidates—Jackson, Adams, and Crawford—were considered.
Henry Clay, as the Speaker of the House and a candidate eliminated from contention, wielded significant influence over the outcome. Henry Clay would be the King-maker, his influence and authority in the House would be telling.
The birth of backroom deals – The Corrupt Bargain
In what became known as the Corrupt Bargain, Clay threw his support behind Adams, who subsequently won the presidency and became the 6th President of the United States.
Soon after, President Adams appointed Henry Clay as his Secretary of State, a position widely viewed at the time as a stepping stone to the presidency. The significance of the appointment had not been lost on any one as John Quincy Adams had previously served as the US Secretary of State in the previous administration.
Jackson and his supporters accused Adams and Clay of striking a backroom deal to secure power, casting doubt on the legitimacy of Adams’s administration. Although no evidence of an explicit agreement ever surfaced, the perception of corruption-tainted Adams’s presidency and mobilized opposition to his leadership.
The Consequences of the Corrupt Bargain
The consequences of the Corrupt Bargain were far-reaching. Adams’s presidency was marred by partisan gridlock and opposition from Jacksonian Democrats, who viewed his administration as illegitimate.
The formation of the Democratic Party
This controversy galvanized Jackson’s supporters, leading to the formation of the Democratic Party and the eventual rise of what has become known as the Jacksonian democracy.
Four years later, in the election of 1828, Jackson defeated Adams in a landslide victory, capitalizing on widespread public resentment over the perceived betrayal of 1824 and positioning himself as a champion of the common man against political elites.
The scandal also had a significant impact on future elections. It underscored the importance of the popular vote in determining the will of the electorate, even though it held no official power at the time.
The first calls for electoral reform
The outrage over the ‘Corrupt Bargain’ contributed to growing calls for electoral reform and greater transparency in the selection process, as history shows, that reform never took place. While the Electoral College remained intact, this formed the first layer of resentment in the ruling elite and the rigged political system in the United States.
This episode reinforced public distrust of political insiders and deals made in smoke-filled rooms, themes that would resonate in American politics for generations. Which led to the electorate questioning, who teh politicians really served.
The legacy of the Corrupt Bargain lies in its influence on the evolution of political parties and electoral practices in the United States. It highlighted the tensions between populist and elitist approaches to governance and underscored the fragility of public trust in democratic institutions.
By shaping the dynamics of the elections that followed, the Corrupt Bargain of 1824 became a defining moment in the political history of the early republic.
Common FAQs
What was the corrupt bargain of 1824
To the surprise of many, the House elected John Quincy Adams over rival Andrew Jackson. It was widely believed that Clay, the Speaker of the House, convinced Congress to elect Adams, who then made Clay his Secretary of State. Jackson’s supporters denounced this as a “corrupt bargain”.
Why was the corrupt bargain of 1824 important
The “corrupt bargain” that placed Adams in the White House and Clay in the State Department launched a four-year campaign of revenge by the friends of Andrew Jackson.
How did John Quincy Adams win the election of 1824
John Quincy Adams won the election of 1824 despite not having the most popular or electoral votes because no candidate secured a majority in the Electoral College. The election was decided in the House of Representatives, where Speaker Henry Clay,(eliminated) threw his support behind Adams. Adams was then selected as president, and appointed Clay as his Secretary of State, leading Andrew Jackson and his supporters to accuse them of a “corrupt bargain.”
Who won the popular vote in the election of 1824
Andrew Jackson won the popular vote in the election of 1824, receiving more popular votes than any other candidate. However, he did not secure the majority needed and the electoral votes needed to win the presidency. This led to the decision being passed to the House of Representatives, where John Quincy Adams was ultimately chosen as president.
What’s the difference between Populist vote and Electoral vote?
The populist vote is the sum of the total number of votes cast in the election, which lists candidates of overall vote count. The electoral college is the division of votes within regions, so the candidate with populist vote does not necessarily win the election.
How many electoral college votes do you need to win?
A majority of 270 electoral votes is needed to win the presidency of the United States of America.
The Clinton Affair: Clinton–Lewinsky Scandal, Impeachment and The Media
What was the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal? A look at the Monica Lewinsky affair, its impact on Bill Clinton’s presidency, and how the 1998 political scandal impacted U.S. politics.
- Bill Clinton’s affair with a White House intern was one of the biggest US scandals of the 1990s
- The affair began in 1995 and became public in early 1998
- A series of events from the affair eventually led to Clinton’s impeachment
- The affair had little impact on the Democrats polling in the midterm elections but did tarnish Clinton’s legacy
The Clinton–Lewinsky Scandal
The Monica Lewinsky affair was a US political scandal in the late 1990s that centred on an extramarital affair between President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky, a 22-year-old White House intern. The affair began in 1995 and came to public attention in early 1998, leading to a series of events that culminated in Clinton’s impeachment. The scandal not only dominated headlines but also deeply affected Clinton’s presidency and had lasting implications for American politics and culture.
The affair first became public when Linda Tripp, a colleague of Lewinsky’s at the Pentagon, secretly recorded conversations in which Lewinsky disclosed details of her relationship with Clinton. Tripp turned the tapes over to Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who was already investigating Clinton for unrelated matters, including allegations of financial misconduct in the Whitewater real estate scandal. Starr’s investigation expanded to include the Lewinsky affair after he obtained evidence suggesting that Clinton and Lewinsky had engaged in a sexual relationship and that Clinton had encouraged her to lie about it under oath.
In January 1998, news of the affair broke, and Clinton famously denied the allegations during a press conference, stating, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.” However, the situation escalated when Starr’s investigation uncovered physical evidence, including a dress belonging to Lewinsky that contained Clinton’s DNA, proving the relationship. Clinton later admitted to the affair in a televised address in August 1998, acknowledging that his behaviour was inappropriate but insisting that he had not committed any illegal acts.
Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal
The Clinton–Lewinsky scandal was a sex scandal involving Bill Clinton, the president of the United States, and Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern. Their sexual relationship began in 1995—when Clinton was 49 years old and Lewinsky was 22 years old—and lasted 18 months, ending in 1997.
Clinton Impeachment
The scandal led to Clinton’s impeachment by the House of Representatives in December 1998 on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, stemming from his false statements under oath about the affair. Despite this, Clinton was acquitted by the Senate in February 1999, allowing him to complete his second term in office. The impeachment process deeply divided Congress and the American public, with many viewing it as politically motivated. While Clinton’s approval ratings remained high throughout the scandal, the affair tarnished his personal reputation and provided his political opponents with ammunition to criticise his character.
The broader implications of the Monica Lewinsky affair extended beyond Clinton’s presidency. The scandal highlighted the increasing role of the media in political scandals, as 24-hour news coverage and tabloid journalism sensationalised the details of the affair. It also brought issues of privacy, power dynamics, and sexual misconduct into the national conversation. For Lewinsky, the scandal had devastating personal consequences, as she became the subject of intense public scrutiny and ridicule, though she later reemerged as an advocate for anti-bullying and public accountability.
The Lewinsky affair remains one of the most infamous scandals in U.S. history.
Common FAQs
What happened between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky?
Clinton admitted in a taped grand jury testimony on August 17, 1998, that he had engaged in an “improper physical relationship” with Lewinsky. That evening he gave a nationally televised statement admitting that his relationship with Lewinsky was “not appropriate”.
What caused Clinton’s impeachment?
The catalyst for the president’s impeachment was the Starr Report, a September 1998 report prepared by Ken Starr, Independent Counsel, for the House Judiciary Committee. The Starr Report included details outlining a sexual relationship between Clinton and Lewinsky.
What did Bill Clinton do?
Clinton presided over the longest period of peacetime economic expansion in American history. He signed into law the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act but failed to pass his plan for national health care reform.