Labour MPs line up to demand more changes to welfare reform ahead of vote
What happened
Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government has revised its controversial welfare reforms following a fierce backlash from over 120 Labour MPs. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced concessions that protect all existing claimants of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and the health‑related Universal Credit top‑up. The revised plan delays the new eligibility tests until November 2026, introduces a £7 weekly increase to UC health payments and commits £300 million to employment support. However, the changes still reduce the forecasted savings from £5 billion to £2.5 billion by 2030, and officials estimate that around 150,000 people will still be pushed into poverty as a result.
Why it matters
This partial U‑turn represents a significant challenge to Starmer’s leadership and highlights deep divisions within the party over balancing fiscal restraint with social justice. It follows earlier reversals on winter fuel payments and reflects growing concern about welfare reforms. The changes also put pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves to bridge a £2.5 billion fiscal gap, potentially requiring tax rises or departmental cuts.
Reaction
Rebel MPs and disability charities welcomed the concessions but maintain they fall short. Labour MPs Debbie Abrahams and Meg Hillier indicated they would continue opposing the bill unless further protections are introduced, particularly for future claimants. Disability groups warned that still around 150,000 people will be negatively affected. Meanwhile, Downing Street insists the revised bill is fair and sustainable, and Labour ministers defended the reforms as necessary for restoring long-term viability to the welfare system.
What next
A crucial Commons vote is expected this week, and Labour is scrambling to secure backing from wavering MPs. Some backbenchers may still vote against or abstain, risking a defeat. Ministers are preparing to offer last-minute further compromise amendments, possibly adjusting PIP thresholds or delaying parts of the reform. If the bill fails, Starmer faces a serious political setback that could force a full rethink of welfare policy and further delay the legislation.
