Several of Thursday’s newspaper front pages lead on various stories regarding the latest in Gaza – most of the papers had gone to print before news of Israel’s overnight air strikes, which killed at least 50 people. Online, the coverage is much more thorough, with the latest from the strip.
Daily Star reports workers across Britain are taking part in a day of action for Palestine tomorrow, demanding an end to 77 years of the Nakba or ”catastrophe” that saw hundreds of thousands of Palestinians expelled from their homes during the founding of the state of Israel.
The headline “End the Nakba: Workers unite in call for end to 77 years of Gaza catastrophe” uses emotive and politically charged language to frame a call for solidarity.
“End the Nakba” evokes historical trauma, while “77 years of Gaza catastrophe” underscores long-term suffering.
“Workers unite” adds a collective, activist tone, linking labour movements with global justice. The headline appeals to moral urgency and shared resistance.
The National says UK government lawyers have said that the evidence “does not support” conclusions that a genocide has happened – or is happening, in Gaza. The paper says the government lawyers made the argument despite Labour’s claims that any determination of genocide is for the judges to decide.
The headline “UK government lawyers deny Gaza genocide” uses stark, authoritative language to frame a contentious legal and political stance.
“Deny Gaza genocide” is a highly charged phrase, suggesting a rebuttal of serious allegations, which immediately evokes moral and emotional weight.
By placing “UK government lawyers” at the forefront, the headline lends institutional credibility to the denial while simultaneously inviting scrutiny.
It’s a provocative construction that signals controversy and implicitly challenges the reader to question official narratives.
BBC News says the majority were killed in Khan Younis in the south, with deaths also reported in Beit Lahia and Deir al-Balah. It comes as Israel continues to block aid into the strip amid fears of mass starvation. One man told the broadcaster: “I cannot move well due to the severity of the hunger.”
The headline “Israeli air strikes kill at least 62, civil defence says, as agencies warn of starvation” combines immediate violence with a looming humanitarian crisis to create a powerful, urgent narrative.
“Kill at least 62” provides a stark death toll, underscoring the human cost, while citing “civil defence” adds a local, on-the-ground source.
The second half—“agencies warn of starvation”—broadens the scope from military action to widespread civilian suffering. It’s a dual-focus tactic that intensifies emotional impact by pairing death with deprivation, demanding attention through a sense of escalating catastrophe.
The Guardian Online reports Donald Trump said on Thursday he wanted the United States to “take” Gaza and turn it into a “freedom zone”.
“I have concepts for Gaza that I think are very good, make it a freedom zone, let the United States get involved and make it just a freedom zone,” the US leader said in Qatar, adding: “I’d be proud to have the United States have it, take it, make it a freedom zone.”
The headline “Trump says US should turn Gaza into ‘freedom zone’ as more than 80 killed in Israeli strikes” employs a juxtaposition of political ambition and humanitarian crisis to provoke strong reactions.
The phrase “freedom zone” is a euphemistic term that suggests liberation and progress, yet in this context, it contrasts sharply with the grim reality of ongoing violence, as indicated by “more than 80 killed in Israeli strikes.”
This contrast serves to highlight the dissonance between political rhetoric and the on-the-ground situation, a common media tactic to elicit critical engagement from the audience.
Copyright WTX News 2025