A lot, apparently. (Credits: via REUTERS)
Rwanda is speculated to receive an extra £15million to take migrants who arrive in Britain on small boats.
Home Secretary James Cleverly went to Kigali to seal a deal, in an effort to make the Rwanda asylum plan legally water-tight after the Supreme Court deemed the plan unlawful.
Readers are questioning why the government keeps spending taxpayer money, when it’s only a small number of migrants.
Why won’t the UK just cut its losses?
We’ve already given £140million to Rwanda (Metro, Wed), with probably more to come in a futile attempt to send 200 asylum seekers there and take some back in return. The worst accountant in the country would have shouted, ‘Cut your losses’ years ago.
At this rate our taxpayers will end up being the biggest foreign-currency earner for the African country. Shameful. Robert Boston, Kingshill, Kent
