Friday’s front pages are dominated by the horror crash in India in which 241 people were killed on board and 53 killed on the ground as a plane crashed moments after takeoff.
The flight was bound for London Gatwick.
One man – a British national – remarkably survived the crash. He was sat in seat 11A. The papers dub it the “miracle of seat 11A.”
Tributes have poured in, and investigations into what caused the crash have begun. Authorities in India are searching for the black box.
It puts a renewed spotlight on Boeing which is attempting to rebuild its image after two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019. The Indian PM is reportedly assessing the grounding of all Boeing flights in India.
The Sun says “Miracle Brit in seat 11A” – the seat of Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a father from Leicester who was the only survivor of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash which killed all the other 241 passengers and crew on board.
This headline uses sensationalism and minimal context to grab attention—“MIRACLE BRIT” immediately evokes emotion and intrigue, while “SEAT 11A” adds specificity and drama. It’s a classic tabloid tactic, turning survival into a personal, almost mythical story to draw readers in quickly.
The Daily Star also calls it a “miracle” noting he was sat in seat 11A and quotes the survivor’s family as saying “he had no idea how he walked away from the wreckage”. The paper says the doomed Air India flight was carrying 53 British nationals, including a boy of two and a four-year-old girl, who are both confirmed dead in the horror crash that has killed over than 200 people.
This headline uses dramatic and emotive language—“miracle,” “survives,” and “horror”—to heighten the shock and human interest of the story. Capitalising “BRIT” emphasises national identity, making it more relatable for UK readers. It’s a classic example of human-focused, tabloid-style storytelling designed to evoke awe and sympathy.
The Daily Telegraph picks up on the Pakistani prime minister’s vow to take revenge for “every drop” of blood spilt by India in what the paper calls the “worst clash for decades between the nuclear-armed neighbours.”
This headline uses stark contrast and emotional language—“290 die” versus “Brit walks away”—to intensify drama and national focus. “Miracle” and “against all odds” amplify the sense of extraordinary survival, while the capitalised “Brit” personalises the tragedy for UK readers. It’s a powerful tabloid tactic that combines tragedy with hope to grip attention.
The FT has a different take, looking at the pressure on Boeing. The paper calls it the worst aviation disaster in more than a decade. It is the first crash of that model of plane since it entered service in 2011 – it comes as Boeing is trying to “rebuild trust” following two previous crashes in 2018 and 2019.
This headline blends factual reporting with subtle blame and scale. Highlighting “more than 240 die” and “deadliest since 2014” adds weight and urgency, while “new pressure piled on Boeing” shifts focus toward accountability. It uses a cause-and-consequence structure—a common broadsheet tactic—to inform while framing corporate responsibility.
The Guardian reports the plane crashed into a hostel housing “medical students, doctors and their families.” The paper says the Indian government is considering grounding Air India’s Boeing 787 fleet, just a day after one of the airline’s aircraft of the same make crashed in Ahmedabad city, killing more than 240 people.
This headline is brief and direct, using the death toll and UK connection to heighten impact for British readers. The phrase “on way to UK” personalises the tragedy, while “at least 260 die” leaves room for rising numbers—adding to the sense of unfolding disaster. It’s a straightforward but emotionally charged framing tactic.
Copyright WTX News 2025