Get you up to speed: Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii law restricting guns on private property that’s open to public
The Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law that restricted concealed-carry permit holders from bringing firearms onto private property open to the public in a 6 to 3 decision in the case Wolford v. Lopez. The ruling upheld the argument made by a group of gun owners and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition, affirming that the restriction violated the Second Amendment.
The Supreme Court’s ruling follows a legal dispute initiated in 2023, when three residents and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition challenged the state’s carry restrictions. Hawaii’s law, described as the “vampire rule,” was enacted after the Court’s 2022 landmark decision on gun rights, and currently stands alongside similar laws in only four other states.
Hawaii’s government has signalled its intention to review its firearm regulations in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, which invalidated the state’s “vampire rule” restricting concealed-carry permit holders. The decision is expected to prompt legislative changes, as Hawaii navigates its remaining firearm restrictions, particularly those in sensitive locations such as schools and government buildings.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how the Supreme Court’s ruling will affect the enforcement of other existing firearms restrictions in Hawaii.
Supreme Court invalidates Hawaii law on guns in publicly accessible private property
Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Hawaii restriction that prohibits concealed-carry permit holders from bringing their firearms onto private property that is open to the public.
In a 6 to 3 decision in the case Wolford v. Lopez, the high court sided with a group of gun owners and a gun-rights group who argued that Hawaii’s rule restricting where they could carry firearms violates the Second Amendment.
The justices found unconstitutional the Hawaii law requiring people with concealed-carry permits to receive permission before bringing their guns onto private property that is open to the public — places like gas stations, restaurants or shops.
The ruling in favor of the gun owners follows the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in which the high court recognized for the first time that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry a firearm outside the home.
That decision laid out a new framework for courts to apply when determining the constitutionality of a gun restriction, which requires the government to show that a measure is rooted in the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation. The first test of that new standard came in 2024, when the Supreme Court upheld a federal law barring people subject to domestic violence restraining orders from having guns.
The high court said last week in a case involving a federal firearms restriction that the government cannot automatically disarm people who regularly use marijuana and are not dangerous.
The Supreme Court’s ruling does not impact Hawaii’s other restrictions on guns in places like bars, beaches or parks, which were not at issue in the case, or sensitive locations like schools or government buildings.
Hawaii’s law, which has been dubbed the “vampire rule,” requires armed concealed-carry permit holders to seek permission before entering private property that is open to the public. Carrying a gun without that permission is a misdemeanor that is punishable by up to one year in prison.
Hawaii is one of five states with laws presumptively restricting carry by license-holders on private property, though similar measures in New York, California and Maryland have been blocked by courts. In the remaining 45 states, licensed handgun owners can generally carry arms onto publicly-accessible private property.
The limits on the places people in Hawaii could bring their firearms were signed into law following the Supreme Court’s 2022 landmark gun rights decision.
The dispute before the Supreme Court dates back to 2023, when three Maui County residents and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition challenged the state’s default rule as a violation of the Second Amendment. A federal district court sided with the challengers, finding Hawaii’s restriction likely violates the Second Amendment as applied to property that is accessible to the public.
But after the state appealed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld Hawaii’s law.
The Trump administration backed the gun owners in the case and argued that the measure was “blatantly unconstitutional” and effectively prevented public carry, as any armed permit holder risked committing a crime simply by stopping to put gas in their car or running errands at a grocery store.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in January and appeared likely to side with the gun owners.