Donald Trump plans for a third term – Donald Trump’s recent interviews in which he expressed he might seek a third term as president, despite US law limiting presidents to two terms in office, is dominating news everywhere – not just the United States.
His plans have been met with widespread criticism and fears that democracy is crumbling in the United States.
Donald Trump plans for a third term despite the law
Why plans are already in motion for a Trump third term – no matter what the law says
Explainer – The headline carries bias through its provocative language. The phrase “no matter what the law says” suggests that Trump is disregarding legal restrictions, portraying him as defiant or even unlawful. The phrase “plans are already in motion” also adds a sense of inevitability or action, which could imply that Trump is actively working to bypass the law.
- The Independent says plans for a third Trump term are underway as his team explores the idea – no matter what the law says. The paper says despite the law his team are flirting with the idea of running again and the “Democrats are nowhere to be seen.”
I’m not joking about a third term as president, Trump insists
Explainer – The headline uses the phrase “I’m not joking” to emphasise doubt or disbelief about Trump’s serious intentions, subtly implying that his claim might be viewed as unserious or absurd. This framing could undermine the credibility of his statement, suggesting that Trump is exaggerating or not fully committed to his idea of a third term.
- The Times says acting as JD Vance’s vice president could be one route to taking back the White House after the 2028 election – despite the 22nd Amendment of the US Constitution.
Reaction from American newspapers
Trump won’t rule out seeking a third term in the White House, tells NBC News ‘there are methods‘ for doing so
Explainer – The headline introduces bias through its phrasing. The use of “won’t rule out” implies uncertainty or an open possibility, which can make Trump’s statement seem more provocative or controversial. Additionally, the phrase “there are methods” suggests that Trump is hinting at alternative ways to bypass the law, potentially framing him as attempting to circumvent legal restrictions, which could evoke skepticism about his intentions.
“A lot of people want me to do it,” Trump said in a Sunday-morning phone call with NBC News, referring to his allies. “But, I mean, I basically tell them we have a long way to go, you know, it’s very early in the administration,” reports NBC News.
Trump suggests ‘methods’ exist for bid for unconstitutional third term
Explainer – The headline shows bias through the use of the word “unconstitutional,” which immediately frames Trump’s third-term bid negatively by highlighting its legal illegitimacy. This word choice implies that his actions are inherently wrong or unlawful, shaping the reader’s perception before they read further. Additionally, the phrase “suggests ‘methods’ exist” adds an element of intrigue and suspicion, portraying Trump as attempting to find ways around the law, thus framing him as being manipulative or potentially undermining democratic norms.
- The Washington Post says that President Donald Trump on Sunday declined to rule out seeking a third presidential term — an unconstitutional act explicitly barred under the 22nd Amendment — saying that “there are methods which you could do it.”
Trump says ‘there are methods’ for seeking a third term, adding that he’s ‘not joking’
Explainer – The headline shows bias by focusing on Trump’s phrase “there are methods” and framing it in a way that emphasises potential illegality or manipulation. The inclusion of “he’s ‘not joking’” also suggests scepticism, implying that Trump’s statement might be viewed as either absurd or untrustworthy. The combination of these elements subtly casts doubt on the seriousness or validity of his claim, shaping the reader’s perception to be more critical of Trump’s intentions.
- CNN says President Donald Trump on Sunday did not dismiss the idea of pursuing a third term in the White House, despite the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution prohibiting it, claiming that “there are methods” to achieving this and emphasizing that he was “not joking.”