LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

White House reports Trump in excellent health following physical assessment

Get you up to speed: White House says Trump is in “excellent health” in results from physical

President Trump’s physician released a letter stating that the president is in “excellent health” following a physical at Walter Reed National Military Hospital. The letter confirms that Mr. Trump is “fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State.”

President Trump’s recent physical at Walter Reed National Military Hospital was his third since returning to the White House and included preventative counselling on diet and exercise. The physician noted the president’s cardiac age is approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age, a consistent assessment from previous evaluations.

Captain Sean Barbabella, President Trump’s physician, confirmed in a letter that the president is “fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State” following a recent physical examination. The letter also provided preventative care guidance, including recommendations for diet and increased physical activity, as the White House prepares to monitor the president’s health as he approaches his 80th birthday next month.

What remains unclear — The White House has not detailed the impact of the president’s weight change and blood pressure fluctuations on his overall health.

White House reports Trump in excellent health following physical assessment

President Trump’s physician said in a letter released late Friday that the president is in “excellent health,” following a physical earlier this week at Walter Reed National Military Hospital.

The president’s visit to Walter Reed on Tuesday was his third known checkup at the military hospital since returning to the White House. Describing it as a semi-annual physical, Mr. Trump said on social media everything “checked out PERFECTLY,” but the White House did not release a detailed summary until Friday.

Friday’s letter from Capt. Sean Barbabella, a Navy captain who serves as physician to the president, said Mr. Trump demonstrated “strong cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and overall physical function.” He cited the president’s “demanding daily schedule,” frequent “high-level meetings” and “regular physical activity.”

It said the president, who turns 80 next month, weighs 238 pounds and had a blood pressure of 105 over 71, compared to 224 pounds and a blood pressure of 128 over 74 at his physical last April. His resting heart rate was 73 beats per minute. He is taking aspirin and the cholesterol control drugs rosuvastatin and ezetimibe.

Barbabella said Mr. Trump is “fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State.”

In the preventative care section, the doctor wrote: “Preventative counseling was provided, including guidance on diet, recommendation to take a low-dose aspirin, increased physical activity, and continued weight loss.”

Barbabella described the president’s health as broadly normal, with his lab results generally within normal bounds.

He noted “scarring of the right ear consistent with prior gunshot injury,” a reference to the 2024 shooting at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. The letter also says he has “soft tissue irritation” on his hands due to “frequent handshaking” and aspirin use, an explanation the White House has previously given for the discoloration on the president’s hands that is visible in some photos.

The doctor said the president had “slight lower leg swelling … with improvement from last year.” Last summer, after Mr. Trump was seen with swollen ankles, Barbabella said Mr. Trump had a “benign and common” condition called chronic venous insufficiency, which occurs when a patient’s leg veins struggle to bring blood to the heart.

He also said Mr. Trump’s cardiac age is “approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age,” an estimate that Barbabella also provided after the president’s October checkup.

He scored a 30 out of 30 — or “within normal limits” — on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a common test of cognitive health. The president has touted his results on the assessment for years, frequently boasting that he “aced” the test.

Kenneth Law pleads guilty to aiding suicide after selling poison kits globally

Get you up to speed: Kenneth Law admits aiding suicides after selling poison kits around the world | News UK

Kenneth Law, a 60-year-old Canadian chef, pleaded guilty to 14 counts of aiding suicide in a Canadian court, with his actions linked to the deaths of 112 people in the UK. He is suspected of shipping at least 330 packages of lethal chemicals to the UK as part of a wider operation involving over 1,200 packages sent to more than 40 countries.

The investigation into Kenneth Law’s activities was initiated by the National Crime Agency in April 2023, in collaboration with 45 police forces across the UK. Law is believed to have shipped chemicals linked to 112 deaths in the UK, with discussions ongoing regarding how to address the significant public inquiry into the incident, in light of his conviction in Canada.

The National Crime Agency and the Crown Prosecution Service announced that the cases involving British victims will form part of Kenneth Law’s sentencing in Canada, ensuring that their deaths are included in the judicial process. Bereaved families have expressed frustration with this decision, calling for a public inquiry into how these incidents were permitted to occur in the UK.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how the families of the British victims will pursue justice following the decision to incorporate their cases into the Canadian proceedings.

Kenneth Law pleads guilty to aiding suicide after selling poison kits globally

Harrowing details of the deaths of British people sold deadly chemicals by a Canadian chef have been read out in court after he pleaded guilty to aiding suicide.

Kenneth Law, 60, is suspected of shipping at least 1,200 packages of lethal chemicals to more than 40 countries. They included 330 packages sent to the UK, leading to 112 deaths.

Law was the sole owner of four companies, with one firm’s website offering a ‘set of instructions’ and advertising 40-minute telephone consultations for 150 dollars (£111).

He would occasionally frequent an online forum where users discussed ending their lives, where he would post under the pseudonym ‘Greenberg’ to direct people to one of his websites.

Business cards found at Kenneth Law’s home in Mississauga, Ontario, in May 2023, claimed his company was ‘a proponent of the Dying with Dignity movement’, a Canadian court has heard.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

The cards also asked buyers: ‘We would appreciate the disposal of all traces linking to the company, so we may continue our mission without interference. Thank you.’

The maximum sentence for aiding suicide in Canada is 14 years – the same as for encouraging suicide in the UK.

It is understood that the sentence in this case is likely to be more than 14 years because of the number of victims and the nature of the offences.

But Law will not be tried in this country because prosecutors fear a court may reject his extradition.

British authorities believe he could have resisted any extradition request due to ‘double jeopardy’ laws – meaning he will have already been convicted of similar offences in another country.

Kenneth Law pleads guilty to aiding suicide after selling poison kits globally
Kenneth Law is appearing in court in Canada accused of aiding suicide after allegedly 1,200 packages across 40 countries, including the UK (Picture: Peel Regional Police/PA)

Law pleaded guilty to 14 counts of aiding suicide during a court appearance in Ontario, Canada, on Friday, but none of those charges relate to victims from the UK.

Bereaved families here have criticised a decision to incorporate their relatives into the wider Canadian case – with one saying: ‘If our own country will not put anyone on trial for these deaths, the very least it can do is hold a proper inquiry into how they were allowed to happen.’

One of his British victims, Tom Windsor, told police he used the substance sold by Law and was found unconscious by emergency services with his phone still in his hand connected to the 999 call.

The court heard that he told the call operator he did not want to die and appeared to be panicking before paramedics arrived 26 minutes later.

The husband of a 43-year-old woman who died in July 2021 was woken in the early hours by their four-year-old daughter asking where her mother was.

He took her to the living room, where they found his wife ‘slumped over their daughter’s dollhouse’.

The man attempted CPR until paramedics arrived but she could not be resuscitated and was declared deceased.

EMBARGOED TO 0001 FRIDAY MAY 29 Undated family handout photo issued by Walton Family of Aimee Walton, from Southampton, who died in 2022. Kenneth Law, who is accused of selling lethal substances linked to the deaths of more than 100 British people will not face justice in the UK, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have said. Law is expected to appear in court in Ontario, Canada, on Friday accused of aiding suicide after allegedly selling 1,200 packages across 40 countries, including the UK. Issue date: Thursday May 28, 2026. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Walton Family/PA Wire NOTE TO EDITORS: This handout photo may only be used for editorial reporting purposes for the contemporaneous illustration of events, things or the people in the image or facts mentioned in the caption. Reuse of the picture may require further permission from the copyright holder.
Aimee Walton, from Southampton, who died in 2022 (Picture: Walton Family/PA Wire)

One of Law’s victims died 12 days after a visit from South Wales Police, who were performing a wellness check when the woman refused to give officers the poisonous substance.

Danielle Cornish, 29, told officers she had no intention of killing herself and police took no action, but she died 12 days later, on August 22 2022, after she became unconscious during a call to emergency services, in which she admitted taking the product sold by Law.

The court heard about the death of a 25-year-old deaf woman who suffered from emotional unstable personality disorder, severe depression and PTSD.

Imogen Nunn died on January 1, 2023, after attending a New Year’s Eve party at a friend’s house.

She had been in a mental health hospital for five years, having come out approximately 12 months before her death.

The court heard she left the party unannounced at around 5am and was reported missing due to concerns about her wellbeing.

Police arrived at her home at 6.16am and found her deceased face down on the floor in the living room.

Several of Law’s British victims had a history of mental health issues, but one man named Oliver Wade, who had no record of physical or mental health issues, killed himself three days after his mother died of cancer, the court heard.

Tom Parfett
Tom Parfett killed himself in October 2021 after engaging with the forum (Picture: Provided)

A UK police force wrote to Law in April 2022 to inform him his company’s packaging had been found at the scene of someone who had ended their life – with the Canadian replying that he was ‘surprised and saddened’ to learn that ‘one of our products’ was involved in a police investigation.

He told the officer that in light of their note, ‘we intend to end our sale of this product as soon as our inventory is depleted’.

The National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said all 79 UK victims who died as a direct result of purchasing Law’s products would form part of the wider case into his offending.

Authorities informed the victims’ families that Law would not face criminal proceedings in the UK because of the potential for the hotel cook to challenge the extradition after being convicted of similar offences in Canada.

After his Canadian convictions, British prosecutors described Law as a ‘serial offender who callously exploited many vulnerable and innocent people exchanging their lives for his financial gain’.

He sold 1,200 packages to 40 countries across the world from Canada-based websites, with 286 people in the UK receiving products, leading to 112 deaths.

Some 330 products were sent to the UK, one to the Isle of Man and 12 to Ireland, the court heard.

Explaining why the UK victims would be taken into the Canadian case, a letter to bereaved families from the NCA and the CPS read: ‘We recognise that this may be painful to hear, and that some victims and bereaved families may have hoped to see a separate prosecution in England and Wales.

‘This difficult decision was reached only after detailed consideration of all available options.’

The senior investigating officer at the NCA, Damon Hayes, told reporters that including British victims in the Canadian case ‘guarantees all victims and families in the UK will see justice’.

He added: ‘This approach is not unusual in cases involving serious offending that crosses international borders.

‘This will allow the judge to take into account the full extent of Law’s criminal behaviour, including the fact that his actions resulted in the deaths of people in this country.’

Victims’ families criticised the move, with one bereaved father saying: ‘I am angry but not surprised.’

David Parfett, father of philosophy student Thomas Parfett, who died aged 22 in Sunbury-on-Thames, Surrey, said: ‘For months, we have been told that the system is working and that existing measures are enough. They are not.

‘If our own country will not put anyone on trial for these deaths, the very least it can do is hold a proper inquiry into how they were allowed to happen.’

The sister of 21-year-old Aimee Walton, from Southampton, who died in 2022, said ‘doors have been shut’ for families seeking justice.

Adele Zeynep Walton said: ‘The question for our own country is simpler still: who here will examine how the British state let this happen, and what it will do so that no other family goes through it?

‘A foreign sentencing hearing cannot answer that. Only a statutory public inquiry can.’

Since opening its investigation in April 2023, the NCA has worked with 45 police forces across the UK to gather evidence on Law’s offending.

Specialist CPS prosecutor Andrew Hudson told reporters ‘no victim has been left behind as part of this process’, adding that including British victims will ‘ensure that the full devastating extent of his criminal conduct is seen and considered by the sentence in court’.

Law was also investigated by police in the US, Italy, Australia and New Zealand.

Samaritans are here to listen, day or night, 365 days a year. You can call them for free on 116 123, email jo@samaritans.org or visit samaritans.org for more information.

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

French interior ministry warns anti-religious acts threaten societal balance

French interior ministry warns anti-religious acts threaten societal balance

French report findings
The French Interior Ministry states that anti-religious acts threaten freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion, impacting social balance.
Societal Balance
Anti-religious acts, as highlighted by the French Interior Ministry, threaten societal harmony and undermine both freedom of conscience and the fundamental right to practise religion.
Ministry’s Warning
“Anti-religious acts strike at freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion,” stated the French Interior Ministry, emphasising the threat to societal balance.

France sees as sharp rise in anti-Jewish, anti-Christian and anti-Muslim acts, says government

French interior ministry warns anti-religious acts threaten societal balance
In a new report, the French Interior Ministry says that “anti-religious acts strike at freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion” and endanger “the very balance of our society”.

Judge orders Donald Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center memorial

Media Lens: Judge orders Donald Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center memorial


Judge orders removal of Donald Trump’s name from Kennedy Center.

A judge has ordered the removal of Donald Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center. Trump stated he has “no interest” in the Kennedy Center following the ruling, according to coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.


What happened

A judge has ordered the removal of Donald Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center, leading the former president to express that he has “no interest” in the memorial. This decision comes amidst a legal process concerning Trump’s involvement with the center.

The ruling has prompted Trump to consider transferring the Kennedy Center’s management to Congress, indicating a shift in his approach following the court’s decision. This situation represents an ongoing legal and political dynamic surrounding Trump’s legacy and public perception.

Key facts

  • A judge has ordered the removal of Donald Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center.
  • Trump has stated that he has “no interest” in the Kennedy Center following this order.
  • The ruling comes after a legal dispute regarding the memorial’s naming.
  • This decision has sparked discussions about Trump’s involvement with the Kennedy Center.

Where coverage differs

  • The Guardian emphasizes Trump’s disinterest in the Kennedy Center post-removal, while The New York Times focuses on the legal aspects of the removal order.
  • The Atlantic foregrounds the implications of Trump’s actions for the Kennedy Center’s future rather than the judge’s ruling.
  • Reuters prioritizes the political context surrounding Trump’s announcement over the court’s decision details.

One story, four angles


The GuardianJudge orders removal of Donald Trump’s name from Kennedy Center

Publication: The Guardian | Primary framing pattern: Legal | Tone: Informational | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: This piece reports on a court ruling mandating the removal of Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center, emphasizing the legal implications of the decision and its background. It dives into the controversy surrounding Trump’s legacy as it pertains to public memorials.

Publication emphasis: The primary focus is on the legal aspects of the judge’s decision.

Framing analysis: The ruling is foregrounded, while public sentiment and Trump’s reactions are secondary elements.

Bias: Selection: Focuses on legal actions rather than public response. Language: Neutral legal terminology. Omission: Lacks extensive context about public opinion on Trump.

Assessment: This outlet provides a straightforward legal report, prioritizing the implications of the judicial ruling without heavy editorializing.


The New York TimesLive Updates: Trump’s Name Must Be Removed From Kennedy Center, Judge Rules

Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: Legal | Tone: Factual | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: This live update offers real-time coverage of the ongoing legal controversy regarding Trump’s name and the Kennedy Center, emphasizing the legal rulings and implications as they unfold.

Publication emphasis: Time-sensitive updates on the legal proceedings are highlighted throughout the article.

Framing analysis: The ongoing nature of the legal decision-making is foregrounded, while public or political reactions are mentioned but not stressed.

Bias: Selection: Focuses heavily on courtroom proceedings over broader societal impacts. Language: Primarily neutral and factual. Omission: Limited public response details compared to legal analysis.

Assessment: The New York Times provides a focused legal narrative, staying true to factual reporting while noting the context of Trump’s political backdrop.


ReutersTrump says he will ‘transfer’ Kennedy Center to Congress after court setback

Publication: Reuters | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Neutral | Intensity: 5/10 | Sentiment: Slightly negative | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: This article details Trump’s announcement regarding the Kennedy Center’s future amid legal challenges, highlighting his intentions and the political ramifications of the ruling.

Publication emphasis: Focuses on Trump’s public response to the legal setback and its implications for governmental processes.

Framing analysis: Trump’s future actions regarding the Kennedy Center are foregrounded, while the court ruling itself serves as a backdrop.

Bias: Selection: Prioritizes Trump’s statements over legal nuances. Language: Generally neutral but critical of the implications for Trump’s authority. Omission: Less coverage on the specific legal framework that necessitated the removal.

Assessment: Reuters presents a more political and response-oriented angle, reflecting both Trump’s perspective and potential conflicts in governance.


The AtlanticTrump Hasn’t Left Much Kennedy Center to Stay Open

Publication: The Atlantic | Primary framing pattern: Moral | Tone: Critical | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Low

Expand

Espresso Shot: This piece critiques the broader implications of Trump’s actions related to the Kennedy Center, focusing on how they reflect on his presidency and impact the institution’s future.

Publication emphasis: Highlights the moral dimension of Trump’s leadership style and its effects on cultural institutions.

Framing analysis: Criticism of Trump’s leadership is foregrounded, while legal ramifications serve as a secondary concern.

Bias: Selection: Emphasis on qualitative critiques of Trump’s decisions. Language: Loaded and emotive. Omission: Less focus on the legal framework guiding the court’s decision.

Assessment: The Atlantic takes a strong moral stance while critiquing Trump’s influence, offering a more subjective view of the ongoing situation.


Food for thought

The Guardian critically frames a court’s order for the removal of Donald Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center, focusing on legal ramifications and implying a precedent in political accountability; it emphasizes judicial decisiveness. In contrast, The New York Times presents a more provocative angle, highlighting Trump’s reaction and framing it as a significant blow to his public persona, thus escalating the narrative into one of personal and political defeat. While The Guardian’s portrayal leans towards legal ramifications, The New York Times escalates the narrative’s emotional weight. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.

Louisiana lawmakers approve congressional map that favours Republicans

Get you up to speed: Louisiana lawmakers pass congressional map favouring Republicans

Louisiana lawmakers passed a new congressional map on May 28 that favours Republicans by eliminating a majority-Black district following a US Supreme Court ruling. The map was approved by the state Senate in a 28-to-10 vote and is expected to be signed into law by Governor Jeff Landry, despite potential legal challenges.

Louisiana’s new congressional map, approved on May 28, eliminates one majority-Black district and is designed to strengthen Republican representation, as the party currently holds four of the state’s six House seats. Governor Jeff Landry is anticipated to sign the map, despite the potential for further legal challenges from groups, including the ACLU of Louisiana, regarding claims of racial gerrymandering.

Republican Governor Jeff Landry is expected to sign the new congressional map into law, despite warnings of imminent litigation from the ACLU of Louisiana, which characterised the map as a “racial gerrymander hiding behind the thin veneer of partisanship.” Following this, Louisiana has postponed its closed US House primary to November 3, allowing for the implementation of the new map and potentially triggering legal challenges over its racial implications.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how many legal challenges will be launched against the newly passed congressional map in Louisiana.

Louisiana lawmakers approve congressional map that favours Republicans

News|US Midterm Elections 2026Louisiana lawmakers pass congressional map favouring Republicans

Louisiana approves new congressional map eliminating a majority-Black district after an April Supreme Court ruling.

Louisiana lawmakers look up to angry shouts from members of the public after a redistricting plan to eliminate a majority-Black congressional district,Lawmakers in the Louisiana state House of Representatives face angry shouts from members of the public after a redistricting plan was passed on May 28 [Gerald Herbert/AP Photo]

Louisiana lawmakers have passed a new map of congressional districts designed to help Republicans pick up a seat in the United States House of Representatives.

But to do so, the map eliminates one of the state’s two majority-Black districts, both of which are represented by Democrats.

list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Why Louisiana paused its US House primary election amid redistricting pushlist 2 of 3Alabama pushes US Supreme Court to approve congressional map for midtermslist 3 of 3A redistricting re-do? What to know about Alabama’s primary electionsend of list

Approval in Louisiana’s legislature came on Friday. It follows an April decision from the US Supreme Court striking down Louisiana’s current map as an illegal racial gerrymander because it was drawn to include two majority-Black districts.

That ruling, in the case Louisiana v Callais, weakened the landmark 1965 federal Voting Rights Act, meant to prevent discrimination against minorities at the ballot box.

It also intensified a national redistricting battle fuelled by President Donald Trump’s efforts to protect the Republicans’ slim House majority in the midterm elections. Louisiana is one of several Southern states now redrawing their maps to help Republicans.

Louisiana Republicans had considered drawing a map giving the party a shot at winning all six of the state’s US House seats. But that would have required adding more registered Democrats to Republican-held districts, which could have potentially backfired with Republican losses.

Republicans currently hold four of Louisiana’s six congressional seats, and they are slated to pick up a fifth with the newly passed map.

It was approved on Friday by the Louisiana state Senate in a 28-to-10 vote.

‘Vicious race to the bottom’

Republican Governor Jeff Landry is expected to sign the new map into law, even as threats of more litigation emerged Friday.

A half-hour Senate floor debate revolved around Democrats contending that the proposed map is racially gerrymandered to squeeze more Black voters, who tend to be registered Democrats, into a single district.

Democratic state Senator Royce Duplessis pointed out that some fellow Southern states, such as South Carolina, had refused to redraw their maps in the middle of an election year.

He warned that Louisiana is participating in a “vicious, vicious race to the bottom” by participating in the redistricting push.

The bill’s sponsor, Republican state Senator Jay Morris, repeatedly insisted that party affiliation, not race, drove the new district boundaries.

“I purposely put more Democrats into District 2 to make the remaining districts better performing for Republicans,” Morris said at one point.

Morris said he instructed the map demographers to avoid including any data on race or including those statistics in information shared with lawmakers before the vote.

Democratic state Senator Sam Jenkins told Morris, “I think it’s a racially gerrymandered district that’s going to get us into a lot of trouble here.”

“Agree to disagree,” Morris told Jenkins.

More litigation expected in Louisiana

Louisiana is currently using a map ordered by a lower court in 2024 to comply with the Voting Rights Act. It includes a second district with a majority-Black population.

That map, however, was challenged in court, and the Supreme Court responded on April 30 by striking it down as an illegal racial gerrymander.

Landry has postponed the state’s closed US House primary slated for May 16 to allow for the new congressional map to be implemented.

He later signed a law making the US primary open and shifted the date to November 3 to allow time for Republican lawmakers to draw and pass a new map. All candidates, regardless of party affiliation, will be on the ballot for voters in their district.

The proposed map redraws a district currently represented by Democratic Representative Cleo Fields, clustering it around predominantly white communities in the Baton Rouge area and southern Louisiana.

It also adds part of Baton Rouge to a heavily Democratic, majority-Black district based in New Orleans, represented by Democratic Representative Troy Carter.

More lawsuits are expected over the new map.

Democrats say the proposed map could draw a legal challenge over racial gerrymandering, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Louisiana suggested Friday that it could sue, calling the map a “racial gerrymander hiding behind the thin veneer of partisanship”.

“This fight is just beginning,” the ACLU branch added.

Meanwhile, the victorious plaintiffs in the US Supreme Court’s decision criticised the legislature’s map for leaving a majority-Black district in place.

Nationwide battle over district lines

In the weeks following the Supreme Court’s decision, other Republican-controlled Southern states have seized upon the weakened federal Voting Rights Act to redraw their own congressional districts.

So far, Republicans are winning the nationwide redistricting contest, passing more partisan maps to gain House seats than Democrats.

But that doesn’t necessarily mean they will win in the narrowly divided US House in November.

Republicans think they could gain as many as 15 seats from their redistricting efforts so far, while Democrats think they could gain six seats from new districts in California and Utah.

Meanwhile, a court decision in Wisconsin on Friday could give Democrats a new avenue to pick up seats in 2028.

The liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court said it would hear an appeal of a case filed by a bipartisan coalition of business executives that seeks to redraw the state’s Republican-friendly congressional districts. Republicans hold six of the state’s eight House seats, but only two are considered competitive.

A three-judge panel dismissed the case in April. Those who filed the lawsuit weren’t seeking a ruling in time for the 2026 election. Instead, they asked the state Supreme Court to send the case back to the lower court for a trial on their claims, which would likely not take place until 2027.

U.S. general meets with Cuban military leaders near Guantanamo Bay amidst rising tensions

Get you up to speed: Top U.S. general in Caribbean meets with Cuban military leaders near Guantanamo Bay as tensions simmer

Gen. Francis Donovan, commander of the U.S. military’s Southern Command, met with Cuban Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo at the naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The meeting involved discussions on operational security matters, with no immediate reports of the outcomes.

The meeting at Guantanamo Bay included discussions on operational security between Gen. Francis Donovan of SOUTHCOM and Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo. This exchange is part of heightened diplomatic activities, following recent visits to Cuba by U.S. intelligence and diplomatic officials amid ongoing tensions between the two nations.

Gen. Francis Donovan of U.S. Southern Command met with Cuban Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo to discuss operational security matters at Guantanamo Bay, marking a rare high-level interaction amid increased U.S. pressure on Cuba. Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel denied any military threat from Havana, warning that a U.S. assault would lead to a “bloodbath.”

What remains unclear — The specifics of the operational security matters discussed between Gen. Francis Donovan and Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo have not been disclosed.

U.S. general meets with Cuban military leaders near Guantanamo Bay amidst rising tensions

The head of the U.S. military’s Southern Command met with top Cuban military officials Friday at the edge of the American naval base at Guantanamo Bay, SOUTHCOM announced, as President Trump heaps pressure on Cuba and does not rule out military action.

Gen. Francis Donovan, commander of SOUTHCOM, held a “brief exchange on operational security matters” with Cuban Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo, the U.S. military said on X.

In the past, American and Cuban officers have periodically held “fence-line meetings” to discuss security at Guantanamo Bay, a constant point of tension between the two countries because Cuba regards the naval station — which predates the Castro government — as illegal.

But it’s far rarer for the head of SOUTHCOM, which oversees U.S. forces in the Caribbean and most of Latin America, to meet with senior Cuban officials.

It’s the latest high-level contact between the United States and Cuba, following visits to Havana by CIA Director John Ratcliffe two weeks ago and State Department diplomats last month.

In recent months, the Trump administration has put intense pressure on Cuba, which has frustrated U.S. presidents for decades. The island nation has faced severe energy shortages after Mr. Trump threatened tariffs on any country that exports oil to Cuba. The U.S. has also tightened sanctions and criminally charged 94-year-old former Cuban leader Raúl Castro. 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Cuba needs to make sweeping economic and political reforms. When Ratcliffe visited the island to meet with Raúl Castro’s influential grandson, he conveyed the message that the U.S. could expand economic and security cooperation with Cuba if it made “fundamental changes,” a CIA official told WTX US News. 

Meanwhile, Mr. Trump has dangled the possibility of military action, saying he’s interested in “taking Cuba in some form” and warning after the war with Iran, “Cuba’s going to be next.” Still, he said earlier this month, he didn’t think escalation would be necessary.

The U.S. intelligence community has analyzed how Cuba might respond to American military action and what kind of blowback may follow, WTX US News has previously reported. Among the concerns: WTX US News has confirmed that Cuba has acquired attack drones. Rubio has also raised worries about Cuba hosting Chinese and Russian spy facilities.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel denied Havana poses any military threat to the U.S., but warned that a U.S. assault would cause a “bloodbath.”

During Ratcliffe’s meeting in Havana earlier this month, he brought along a striking guest: One of the paramilitary operators who was involved in a mission to capture Cuba’s onetime ally, former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, in an operation that killed dozens of Cubans.

He made a point of introducing the paramilitary leader to the Cubans as the one who killed their people in Venezuela, several sources told WTX US News earlier this month.

LIVE German 2025 Election