Negotiations on the EU-US trade deal remain stalled, as the European Commission reported “progress” after late-night talks with MEPs and member state officials. Despite this, divisions persist over tariff safeguards, with further discussions scheduled for 19 May amid renewed US tariff threats.

Rumen Radev has been appointed Bulgaria’s new prime minister following last month’s parliamentary elections, where he won decisively. Radev, who aims to combat corruption and re-engage with Russia, faces pressing challenges, including budget drafting and judicial reforms, to secure nearly €400 million in EU funds.

US President Donald Trump has set a 4 July deadline for the European Union to implement its trade deal, warning of “much higher tariffs” if not met. This ultimatum follows a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, amid ongoing negotiations and rising tensions over trade commitments.

EU Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra has stated that the European Union must accelerate its shift to alternative energy sources amid escalating energy crises. He emphasised the need for increased electrification, renewables, and interconnectors to reduce dependence on external energy supplies and prepare for future geopolitical challenges.

What’s happening?
A recent court decision indicates that an appeals court is likely to reject Peter Hegseth’s attempt to penalize Senator Mark Kelly for allegedly issuing illegal orders. The case examines the intersection of military authority and congressional oversight.

In contrasting coverage, CNN’s headline states, “Appeals court appears poised to reject Hegseth’s bid to punish Mark Kelly over ‘illegal orders’ video,” framing the narrative around the judicial process. This suggests a focus on the procedural aspects of the court’s decision. Conversely, Politico headlines, “Kelly seems headed for victory over Hegseth in court battle,” emphasizes the implications of the ruling, highlighting the potential success of Senator Kelly and framing the situation in terms of conflict rather than process. Such differences illustrate how the same event can be interpreted through a lens of judicial procedure or political impact, affecting public perception and understanding of the implications involved. Coverage analyzed: CNN | Politico | Cato Institute | Punchbowl News