Explore Manhattan - The ultimate guide to Manhattan - History and Travel guides

TL:DR – Video: Hearts benefit from major VAR call to go six clear of Celtic

Falkirk 0 – 2 Hearts

Claudio Braga (45+2′)
Stephen Kingsley (66′)
Falkirk Stadium
Attendance: 5,000

Key Incidents:

Hearts opened the scoring with a late first-half goal from Braga.
Kingsley secured the win with a goal in the second half.
Major VAR call influenced the match dynamics.
Hearts maintain a six-point lead at the top of the Scottish Premiership.

Hearts Takes Command with VAR Decision

Hearts surged to the top of the Scottish Premiership after a contentious VAR intervention helped secure their 2-0 victory over Falkirk, leaving them six points clear of Celtic. This pivotal win highlights Hearts’ growing dominance in the league.

Despite criticism surrounding the use of VAR, the technology played a crucial role, overturning a potential offside call that could have changed the game’s outcome. Manager Robbie Neilson praised his players’ resilience, especially in navigating challenges posed by Falkirk.

The Crooks of the Matter

In the match, Claudio Braga and Stephen Kingsley netted the goals that solidified Hearts’ position at the summit. Falkirk struggled to match Hearts’ intensity throughout, but a VAR review brought the home side a moment of hope that quickly faded.

The match unfolded at Falkirk Stadium, a venue known for its passionate supporters and vibrant atmosphere. However, Falkirk fans witnessed a frustrating evening as their team failed to capitalise on key opportunities.

What’s Been the Reaction – Whose Involved?

Fans and pundits alike have reacted strongly to the VAR decision. Hearts’ manager, Neilson, remarked, “We kept our composure after the VAR check. It was vital for our game.” Falkirk’s supporters voiced their discontent, expressing frustration over the officiating decisions that affected their side’s performance.

The reaction from the football community reveals a divide; while Hearts celebrate their triumph, Falkirk fans lament the missed chance to challenge for points.

Moving forward, Hearts will look to maintain their lead as they prepare for upcoming fixtures, while Falkirk will aim to regroup and respond to this setback in their quest for league stability.

💪 Harry Milne denies Falkirk from finding an equaliser – a quick check for a penalty took place but play was waved on ⤵️ pic.twitter.com/8CHzjd279a
— Sky Sports Scotland (@ScotlandSky) December 13, 2025

TL:DR – Man Utd loanee has his best performance yet, five chances created and man of the match

Fleetwood Town 2 – 0 Newport County

Scorers: Ethan Ennis (28′), Jack Moorhouse (75′)
Stadium: Highbury Stadium
Attendance: 4,200

Ethan Ennis starred with an assist and was named Man of the Match (8.2 rating).
Created five chances, two major, while effective defensively.
Jack Moorhouse also contributed an assist in the same match.

Manchester United Loanee Ethan Ennis Shines for Fleetwood Town

Ethan Ennis, a promising talent on loan from Manchester United, has been named man of the match after a standout performance that helped Fleetwood Town secure a 2-0 victory. Playing primarily as a right wing-back, Ennis not only provided an assist but also demonstrated exceptional defensive skills during the match.

The young winger’s impressive display follows a recent two-goal performance in the FA Cup, showcasing his growing impact at the club. With several United loanees thriving in their respective teams this season, Ennis is emerging as one of the more celebrated talents, possibly paving the way for a future promotion in January.

Welling United vs. Potters Bar Town Match Postponed Due to Manager’s Injury

The Crooks of the Matter

In the recent match against Newport County, Ennis was pivotal, creating five chances—two categorised as ‘big chances’—while successfully completing five out of eleven crosses. His overall performance was highlighted by winning four duels and making seven recoveries at the back.

The game took place over the weekend at Fleetwood Town’s Highbury Stadium, where supporters witnessed Ennis’s skill and work ethic as he contributed both offensively and defensively.

What’s Been Reaction – Who’s Involved

Fleetwood Town’s coaching staff praised Ennis’s contributions, recognising his man-of-the-match award from SofaScore, with a commendable rating of 8.2. Teammate Jack Moorhouse also picked up an assist in the same fixture, as he continues to make his mark on loan at Leyton Orient.

Reactions from fans and pundits alike have been overwhelmingly positive, with many speculating about Ennis’s potential future with United if he continues to perform at this level.

Looking ahead, the rise of Ennis and other Manchester United loanees appears promising, suggesting that their continued success could lead to further opportunities within the first team as the season progresses.

TL:DR – Welling United v Potters Bar Town: Match postponed after manager Sammy Moore injured in altercation

Potters Bar Town vs. Welling United – Match Postponed

Incident: Serious incident involving a member of Potters Bar Town’s management team.
Stadium: Not specified
Attendance: Not applicable

Key Incidents:

Match postponed due to a serious incident at Potters Bar Town.
Police were called to the ground; the match could not proceed.
The manager received medical care; the club is supporting him.
Incident reported to authorities, including the league and FA.
Further updates on the fixture will be shared later.

Football Match Postponed Due to Serious Incident Involving Club Management

A scheduled match between Potters Bar Town and Welling United was abruptly postponed following “a serious incident involving a member of our management team,” according to Potters Bar Town’s official statement. This unforeseen event prompted police intervention, leading to the game’s cancellation for the safety of all involved.

While specific details regarding the nature of the incident remain undisclosed, Potters Bar Town confirmed that their manager is receiving “appropriate medical care.” The club is offering full support to their management team during this challenging time, and they have referred the matter to relevant authorities, including the league and the Football Association (FA).

The Crooks of the Matter

The incident that led to the suspension of the match occurred shortly before kick-off, forcing a police presence and subsequent action to halt proceedings. The club has stated they are seeking formal advice as they navigate the situation.

The postponement took place at Potters Bar Town’s home ground, which is currently facing challenges on the pitch, sitting at the bottom of the Isthmian League table. Welling United, positioned two places higher, have refrained from commenting on the matter but are coordinating regarding the rescheduling of the fixture.

What’s Been Reaction – Who’s Involved

Nick Robinson, chair of the Isthmian League, acknowledged awareness of the incident, stating, “The league is aware of this matter and are awaiting the written reports of the alleged incident.” He refrained from providing further comments pending additional information.

Reactions have been mixed, with supporters expressing concern for the managerial staff’s welfare. Potters Bar thanked fans for their understanding during this unprecedented situation.

Moving forward, both clubs are set to communicate updates regarding the rearranged fixture once the authorities conclude their investigations. The FA is actively looking into the incident, which might shape future league protocols.

TL:DR

27 European countries recently called for a reevaluation of post-WWII human rights laws, citing migration issues.
Amnesty International condemned this move as a “moral retreat.”
Critics worry this approach could create a “hierarchy of people” and undermine universal human rights.
Europe’s chief human rights official highlighted misperceptions linking migration to crime as harmful.
Concerns rise about populists exploiting these changes, potentially leading to broader violations of rights.

‘Who’s it going to be next time?’: ECHR rethink is ‘moral retreat’, say rights experts | European court of human rights

European Nations Challenge Human Rights Laws Amid Migration Crisis

This week, 27 European countries issued a joint call to reassess post-war human rights laws, deeming them obstacles to effective migration management.

This collective stance has sparked significant debate among EU member states regarding the balance between human rights and national sovereignty.

The tension stems from a letter published in May by nine EU states, including Denmark, Italy, and Poland, which argued that existing human rights legislation hindered their ability to deport criminals. They claimed a need to restore a “right balance” in the context of contemporary challenges.

What Happened

The 27 nations convened to express their grievances, with major countries like France, Spain, and Germany opting not to sign the letter, highlighting a fractious divide over the European Convention on Human Rights.

Human rights advocates, including Europe’s top official Michael O’Flaherty, condemned this rhetoric, asserting it risks establishing a harmful hierarchy of rights based on assumptions linking migration to crime.

O’Flaherty described such claims as “lazy correlations” that misrepresent realities and stoke societal fears.

Stakeholders – Whose Involved

Prominent figures, including O’Flaherty, voiced concerns over politicians’ language regarding human rights. O’Flaherty affirmed the necessity for accurate representation of the Convention’s role, particularly in safeguarding vulnerable populations.

Reaction and Fallout

The reaction has been overwhelmingly critical, with organisations like Amnesty International deeming the push for revising these laws a “moral retreat.” O’Flaherty warned that this could embolden populist movements and ultimately undermine the principle of universality in human rights.

Next Steps

O’Flaherty insists that yielding ground on human rights may create false expectations about controlling migration and cautioned against the broader implications of undermining established conventions.

The discussion on human rights reform is expected to remain contentious as nations grapple with migration issues and public sentiment grows increasingly divided.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by WTX NEWS UK 🇬🇧 (@wtxnews)

TL:DR

Reform UK gains majority with 53 councillors in Lancashire’s local elections.
Councillor Joel Tetlow faces backlash for controversial social media history.
Party’s vague policies raise questions about their competency in managing council.
Reform promises budget cuts but faces backlash over proposed closures of elder care facilities.
Tensions arise over perceived conflicts of interest amid councillors’ actions.
Critics express disillusionment as community welfare is prioritized against austerity measures.

Infighting, broken promises and insisting on the national anthem: what seven months of Reform UK in charge actually looks like Reform UK ( Brexit party)

Reform UK’s New Beginning in Lancashire Faces Struggles
On 22 May 2025, Reform UK kicked off its reign in Lancashire as 53 councillors donned turquoise ties, but they face fierce opposition and internal confusion over policies. The new council, under the leadership of former Tory Stephen Atkinson, aims to implement a cost-cutting agenda amid a £1.2 billion debt crisis.

What Happened

The council’s inaugural meeting included demonstrations against its ‘far-right’ recognition by protesters. Joel Tetlow, a new councillor embroiled in controversy for past social media posts, indicated that their challenges only elevate the party’s profile.

Reform’s platform includes promises to freeze council tax and cut ‘bloated salaries’, but their vague policy outlines raise questions about feasibility.

Where It Happened

Lancashire, a diverse region comprising urban areas like Blackburn and rural landscapes, provides a vital testing ground for Reform’s anti-woke and fascist agenda.

With significant issues such as social care and educational needs at stake, the council must navigate complex community expectations.

Stakeholders – Who’s Involved

Key players include Stephen Atkinson and Tetlow, who have made headlines for their provocative statements and approach to governance. Critics, including Labour councillor Samara Barnes, argue that the new administration’s lack of diverse representation undermines inclusive decision-making.

Reaction and Fallout

Public sentiment reveals deep discontent, particularly concerning proposed closures of elderly care homes, sparking outrage from residents like Dorothy Devereux. For many, the council’s actions threaten not only local welfare but also the credibility of Reform UK’s governance ambitions.

Going forward, the council must confront the challenge of delivering on its promises while managing public outrage and complicated bureaucratic realities.

As Reform UK’s strategies unfold, their approach will be scrutinised in upcoming elections, where their handling of social services could define their future.

TL:DR

The UK government has no plans to mandate reporting collisions with cats despite a petition with nearly 11,000 signatures.
Cats and wild animals are not included in the Road Traffic Act 1988, which only covers specific farm animals.
The government cites difficulties in prosecuting drivers as reasons for the current law, noting that many drivers may be unaware of hitting a cat.
Advocacy group Cats Matter expresses disappointment, emphasising the need for protections similar to those for dogs.

No plans to force drivers to report collisions with cats, government says

The UK government has ruled out plans to require drivers to report collisions involving cats, despite an e-petition garnering nearly 11,000 signatures advocating for such a law. Currently, cats are excluded from the Road Traffic Act 1988, which obliges drivers to report accidents only involving specified animals.

The absence of legal requirements for reporting cat collisions stems from historical laws that focused on working animals rather than domestic pets. A government statement highlighted the challenges in prosecuting drivers due to the small size and elusive behaviour of cats, often active during twilight hours.

### What Happened

A government announcement confirmed that there are no intentions to amend existing legislation concerning pet animals. The statement acknowledged the emotional distress caused when beloved pets are harmed, but reiterated that those behind the wheel may be unaware of a collision, especially when larger vehicles are involved.

The absence of statutory reporting is further compounded by the legislation being originally enacted for working animals, such as dogs and livestock.

### Stakeholders – Who’s Involved

The campaign group Cats Matter has been actively lobbying for a change in legislation, voicing their disappointment with the government’s response. Co-founder Mandy Hobbis critiqued the current laws, advocating for the humane treatment of all pets, including cats.

Additionally, charity Cats Protection highlighted the dangers cats face on roads and called for stronger measures to support injured animals, urging drivers to take any injured cat to the vet.

#### Reaction and Fallout

Community reactions have been mixed, with strong sentiments expressed by animal welfare advocates who believe that domestic pets deserve equal protection under the law. Hobbis’s statements conveyed frustration over what she perceives as a disconnect between the government’s compassion and its legislative action.

### What Will Happen Next

The Cats Matter group aims to continue advocating for legislative changes, and the issue may gain further traction if the e-petition reaches 100,000 signatures, prompting a parliamentary debate.

Meanwhile, cats’ welfare organisations will likely push for broader public awareness on the importance of reporting such incidents, alongside promoting responsible pet ownership.

What's Hot

The Ultimate guide to Manhattan

About Manhattan New York