- UK Government Bans Al Quds Day March: Controversy Sparks National Debate
- Londoners prepare for further travel disruption as tube drivers plan another strike
- Iran launches missile attacks on Israel and Gulf states amid ongoing conflict
- EU counts on small nuclear reactors to meet climate targets and ensure stability
- Researchers uncover lost Nazi cipher manuals for SG-41 machine in Prague
- Slovak prime minister and EU president agree on need to restore Druzhba pipeline
- US destroys ten Iranian boats laying mines in Strait of Hormuz operation
- Von der Leyen faces criticism for expanding EU’s foreign policy role
Six family members heading back from Fossil Rim Wildlife Center in Texas were killed in a head-on crash with a teen driver.
Apple will source most iPhones from India and iPads from Vietnam to avoid the effects of tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, aiming to maintain consumer prices in the US.
If you ever come across Dame Joanna Lumley, do not do this… (Picture: Daniel Loveday/Comic Relief/Getty Images)
Dame Joanna Lumley dubbed it ‘creepy’ when fans take secret photographs of her.
The Absolutely Fabulous star, 77, is always happy to get a picture with a passer-by – as long as she knows about it.
What she can’t stand is when people film or take pictures of her without her permission.
She also has a brilliant reaction when she notices people doing just that.
‘I never mind doing photographs with people, but what I don’t like is when they steal them,’ she explained to Sky News.
‘They don’t ask, you can just see them quietly at a dinner table, going like that [gestures taking a photo] across the restaurant.
Dame Joanna doesn’t like it when fans take secret photos of her (Picture: Hoda Davaine/Dave Benett/Getty Images)
She’s more than happy to pose with fans if they ask (Picture: Victoria Jones-Pool/Getty Images)
‘I walk over and say, “Shall we do a proper picture?” And they get a bit flustered and say, “Oh, I didn’t want to disturb you,” you know? But that’s creepy.’
Dame Joanna finds the constant use of cameras on phones ‘intrusive’ and said it gives her the feeling everyone is being watched to some extent nowadays.
But it’s not just fans this certified national treasure has a problem with in this respect – she doesn’t even like supermarket CCTV cameras.
‘There’s a feeling of being watched, if you’re in a room where there’s a camera – you know you’re being watched… it’s odd,’ she explained.
Dame Joanna is stars in the hit Netflix show of the moment, Fool Me Once, alongside Michelle Keegan.
The Harlan Coben thriller follows Maya Stern (Michelle) as she tries to come to terms with her husband Joe’s murder.
Enter mother-in-law Judith Burkett, who is expertly portrayed by Dame Joanna with her trademark wit and feisty character.
Dame Joanna stars in Netflix’s Fool Me Once alongside Michelle Keegan (Picture: ishal Sharma/Netflix)
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video
The thriller also stars Utopia actor Adeel Akhtar, the BBC’s His Dark Materials actress Jade Anouka, and The Hobbit trilogy star Richard Armitage.
Judith and Maya have a fractured relationship in the series, and Coronation Street star Michelle previously said it was difficult saying some of her lines to such an iconic actor as Dame Joanna.
Speaking on The One Show, Admitted admitted she dreaded having to fire expletives at Dame Joanna, as she said: ‘Honestly, when I read the script, I was like, “Oh no, oh no!”‘
‘We had a bit of a laugh, didn’t we, when we were rehearsing? I don’t think I said it when we were in rehearsals, I was like, “I can’t! I can’t!”‘
Dame Joanna admitted it was a shock, as she added: ‘When it’s not used very often, bad language comes… it slaps out of the screen at you, it does.’
Got a story?
If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us [email protected], calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.
MORE : Dame Joanna Lumley keen to land a role in The White Lotus after watching Jennifer Coolidge
MORE : Dame Joanna Lumley still writes love letters to husband of 37 years – and we’re gone
She’s spoken, people.
Six family members returning from safari killed in head-on crash with teen driver
Six family members heading back from Fossil Rim Wildlife Center in Texas were killed in a head-on crash with a teen driver.
Nvidia profit bonanza drives global rally as stock markets ride AI wave
King Charles to appear on UK bank notes from June
‘A tremendous honour’ – Andy Farrell named as British and Irish Lions head coach for Australia series
He will lead the side Down Under in 2025.
Warren Buffett admits Berkshire’s days of ‘eye popping gains’ are over
FT.com Tweet
The Tech Titan Who Led His Company From a 68-Square-Foot Jail Cell
WSJ Business Tweet
Cliff Notes – Liverpool forward Diogo Jota, brother die in car crash – Spanish Civil Guard
- Diogo Jota, 28, and his brother André Silva, 25, were killed in a car crash near Zamora, Spain, with police investigating potential causes, including a blown tyre.
- Liverpool FC and the Portuguese Football Federation confirmed the tragic news, expressing their condolences and requesting privacy for the families involved.
Liverpool forward Diogo Jota, brother die in car crash – Spanish Civil Guard
Liverpool and Portugal forward Diogo Jota and his brother, André Silva, were killed in a car crash near Zamora, Spain, police said Thursday.
Liverpool FC, the Portuguese Prime Minister Luís Montenegro and Portuguese Football Federation (FPF) also confirmed the incident.
The Spanish Civil Guard confirmed to The Associated Press that Jota and his brother were found dead after their car went off a road on an isolated stretch of highway about an hour west of Zamora. Authorities said the car, a Lamborghini, according to police was in flames.
Firefighters were called in as the fire spread to nearby vegetation, authorities said.
Police were investigating the causes of the crash
Police were investigating the causes of the crash, which happened past midnight local time. They said there were no other vehicles involved. The bodies were undergoing forensic analysis.
It wasn’t clear who was driving the car. Police were looking into the hypothesis that the crash happened because of a blown tire.
Jota, who was 28, and his brother, who was 25, were both Portuguese players and the only ones in the car, police said.
Jota’s death comes weeks after he married Rute Cardoso and in a social media post wrote, “Yes to forever.” They have three children, the youngest born last year.
Diogo Jota made 182 appearances for Liverpool in five years at the club
A Civil Guard spokesperson told EU News that they believe the driver lost control of the car after a tire blew out.
The Spanish Civil Guard is one of the two national law enforcement agencies of Spain. They are a separate organisation from the police.
Jota, whose full name was Diogo José Teixeira da Silva, made 182 appearances for Liverpool since joining from Wolves in 2020. He lifted the Premier League title in May, having previously won the FA Cup and two Carabao Cups in his five years at the club.
Silva played with Portuguese club Penafiel in the lower divisions.
“Liverpool Football Club are devastated by the tragic passing of Diogo Jota,” the club said in a statement.
“Liverpool FC will be making no further comment at this time and request the privacy of Diogo and André’s family, friends, teammates and club staff is respected as they try to come to terms with an unimaginable loss.
“We will continue to provide them with our full support.”
The club also lowered its flag to half mast.
Tributes were laid at Anfield for Diogo Jota and his brother, André Silva
UEFA said its thoughts were with relatives, friends and teammates affected “by this heartbreaking loss.” It said a moment of silence will be observed at Euro 2025 matches on Thursday and Friday.
Jota began his career at Portuguese side Paços de Ferreira and also played at Atlético Madrid and FC Porto.
Jota also won 49 international caps for Portugal, during which he won the UEFA Nations League in 2019 and again last month, scoring 14 goals.
The FPF said in a statement: “The Portuguese Football Federation and the entire Portuguese football community are devastated by the deaths of Diogo Jota and André Silva in Spain this morning.
“Diogo Jota was not only a fantastic player with almost 50 caps for the national team, but also an extraordinary person who was respected by all his teammates and opponents. He had a contagious joy and was a reference point in his own community.
Diogo Jota married his longtime partner, Rute Cardoso, in a ceremony on June 22
“The Portuguese Football Federation would like to offer the deepest condolences to the families and friends of Diogo and André, as well as Liverpool FC and FC Penafiel, the respective clubs of the players.
“The Portuguese Football Federation has asked UEFA to hold a minute’s silence ahead of our national team’s match against Spain in the Women’s European Championship on Thursday.
“We have lost two champions. Their deaths represent irreparable losses for Portuguese football, and we will do everything we can to honour their legacy every day.”
The Liga Portugal and Atlético Madrid also paid tribute to the two players
Jota’s Portugal teammate, Cristiano Ronaldo, sent his condolences to the brothers’ family.
“It doesn’t make sense. We were just together with the national team, you had just gotten married,” Ronaldo wrote in Portuguese in a post on social media.
“To your family, your wife, and your children, I send my condolences and wish them all the strength in the world. I know you will always be with them. Rest in peace, Diogo and André. We will all miss you.”
Arguably the best tribute came from his former Liverpool teammate and Brazilian legend Roberto Firmino on Instagram whilst posting a carrousel of pictures for the duos relationship and partnership. Naming the children and family personally, was a special touch.
“When words fail, there are only inexpressible groans. And for that reason I get on my knees, praying that the Holy Spirit comforts the heart of Rute, Dinis, Duarte, Mafalda, Seu Joaquim, Lady Isabel and all the family and friends.
It was a privilege and an honor to have known and lived such special moments alongside you. Rest in Peace to my brother Jota, and Andre.”

Media Lens: UK Government Bans Al Quds Day March: Controversy Sparks National Debate
Story focus: Government approves Met request to ban Al Quds Day march.
Primary entity: BBC
Region: United Kingdom
The government has approved a request from the Metropolitan Police to ban the Al Quds Day march. This decision comes amid concerns regarding public safety and potential disruptions.
Quick links:
What has happened |
Confirmed details |
What remains unclear |
One story, four angles |
What’s missing |
Related links
What has happened
The UK government has approved the Metropolitan Police’s request to ban the Al Quds Day march, a significant event that has faced criticism and controversy in previous years. This decision comes after discussions around public safety and community relations, reflecting the authorities’ concerns regarding potential unrest during the march.
The approval of the ban indicates the government’s prioritisation of public order, especially considering the socio-political context surrounding the event. This move has sparked reactions from various stakeholders, highlighting the ongoing debates about freedom of expression and the balancing act between public safety and the right to protest in the UK.
Confirmed details
- The UK government has approved a request from the Metropolitan Police to ban the Al Quds Day march.
- The decision was made following concerns about potential public safety issues during the event.
- The Al Quds Day march is typically held annually to express solidarity with Palestine.
- The police cited previous incidents at similar events as a reason for the ban.
- The approval was reported by various news outlets, including the BBC.
- The event was scheduled to take place in London.
- The ban is part of ongoing discussions regarding public order and protests in the UK.
What remains unclear
- The specific justification for the Met’s request to ban the Al Quds Day march.
- The potential implications of this ban on public protests and freedom of speech.
- Whether there will be legal challenges against the decision to ban the march.
- The response from community leaders or organisations affected by the ban.
- The measures that will be taken to enforce the ban.
One story, four angles
BBC – Government approves Met request to ban Al Quds Day march
Publication: BBC | Primary framing pattern: Authoritative | Tone register: Informative | Intensity level: Green (2/10) | Sentiment: +0.4 | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot:
The ban on the Al Quds Day march, requested by the Metropolitan Police, frames authorities as protective, but questions linger about freedom of expression.
Framing analysis:
The article emphasises governmental authority and community safety, nudging public perception towards compliance over dissent.
Bias:
Selection: Focus on official narratives.
Language: Neutral terminology.
Omission: Potential dissent voices absent.
Assessment:
The framing suggests a prioritisation of public safety over civil liberties in this governmental action.
What’s missing across coverage
- Details on the specific reasons behind the Metropolitan Police’s request to ban the Al Quds Day march are lacking, such as concerns about public safety or previous incidents related to the event.
- Clarification on the implications of the ban for the organisers and participants of the Al Quds Day march, including potential legal ramifications or alternative actions they might take.
- Information regarding public response or reactions from community groups and political entities about the ban, which could reveal differing perspectives on the issue.
- Context on previous instances where similar events were banned in the UK, highlighting trends or changes in governmental or police policies regarding protests and marches.
Comparing the headlines surrounding the government’s approval for the Metropolitan Police to ban the Al Quds Day march, the BBC adopts a straightforward and factually precise angle, demonstrating the strongest legal discipline in its approach.
In contrast, other outlets tend to frame the issue in a more escalatory manner, highlighting potential conflict and public dissent. This shift in emphasis from a procedural focus (the legality of the ban) to consequences (public reaction and political implications) alters the narrative. Consequence-driven framing can amplify scrutiny from critics and opposition parties, suggesting potential fallout and broader implications for civil liberties.
The emphasis on leadership decisions against a backdrop of unrest further positions the story within a scandal arc, thereby increasing the political stakes.
The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
What to Watch
Amazon prime - TV & Netflix
What to Watch
Love Sports
Media Lens: UK Government Bans Al Quds Day March: Controversy Sparks National Debate Story focus:…
Before You Go
- Readers Digest
-
7
-
User Ratings (2 Votes)
5.9
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.


