- Starmer announces £15 billion defence investment plan amid PMQs clash
- Kelowna businesses report rising crime is affecting downtown operations
- Melat Kiros projected to defeat Diana DeGette in Colorado primary race
- Raise the Colours member charged with making indecent images of children
- Eleven-year-old boy dies from rabies three weeks after bat encounter in Ontario
- European public prosecutor conducts raids over alleged EU fund misuse
- US government lifts restrictions on Anthropic’s AI models Fable and Mythos
- Charter boat sinks off Richmond coast; six presumed drowned, RCMP reports
Six family members heading back from Fossil Rim Wildlife Center in Texas were killed in a head-on crash with a teen driver.
Apple will source most iPhones from India and iPads from Vietnam to avoid the effects of tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, aiming to maintain consumer prices in the US.
If you ever come across Dame Joanna Lumley, do not do this… (Picture: Daniel Loveday/Comic Relief/Getty Images)
Dame Joanna Lumley dubbed it ‘creepy’ when fans take secret photographs of her.
The Absolutely Fabulous star, 77, is always happy to get a picture with a passer-by – as long as she knows about it.
What she can’t stand is when people film or take pictures of her without her permission.
She also has a brilliant reaction when she notices people doing just that.
‘I never mind doing photographs with people, but what I don’t like is when they steal them,’ she explained to Sky News.
‘They don’t ask, you can just see them quietly at a dinner table, going like that [gestures taking a photo] across the restaurant.
Dame Joanna doesn’t like it when fans take secret photos of her (Picture: Hoda Davaine/Dave Benett/Getty Images)
She’s more than happy to pose with fans if they ask (Picture: Victoria Jones-Pool/Getty Images)
‘I walk over and say, “Shall we do a proper picture?” And they get a bit flustered and say, “Oh, I didn’t want to disturb you,” you know? But that’s creepy.’
Dame Joanna finds the constant use of cameras on phones ‘intrusive’ and said it gives her the feeling everyone is being watched to some extent nowadays.
But it’s not just fans this certified national treasure has a problem with in this respect – she doesn’t even like supermarket CCTV cameras.
‘There’s a feeling of being watched, if you’re in a room where there’s a camera – you know you’re being watched… it’s odd,’ she explained.
Dame Joanna is stars in the hit Netflix show of the moment, Fool Me Once, alongside Michelle Keegan.
The Harlan Coben thriller follows Maya Stern (Michelle) as she tries to come to terms with her husband Joe’s murder.
Enter mother-in-law Judith Burkett, who is expertly portrayed by Dame Joanna with her trademark wit and feisty character.
Dame Joanna stars in Netflix’s Fool Me Once alongside Michelle Keegan (Picture: ishal Sharma/Netflix)
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video
The thriller also stars Utopia actor Adeel Akhtar, the BBC’s His Dark Materials actress Jade Anouka, and The Hobbit trilogy star Richard Armitage.
Judith and Maya have a fractured relationship in the series, and Coronation Street star Michelle previously said it was difficult saying some of her lines to such an iconic actor as Dame Joanna.
Speaking on The One Show, Admitted admitted she dreaded having to fire expletives at Dame Joanna, as she said: ‘Honestly, when I read the script, I was like, “Oh no, oh no!”‘
‘We had a bit of a laugh, didn’t we, when we were rehearsing? I don’t think I said it when we were in rehearsals, I was like, “I can’t! I can’t!”‘
Dame Joanna admitted it was a shock, as she added: ‘When it’s not used very often, bad language comes… it slaps out of the screen at you, it does.’
Got a story?
If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us [email protected], calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.
MORE : Dame Joanna Lumley keen to land a role in The White Lotus after watching Jennifer Coolidge
MORE : Dame Joanna Lumley still writes love letters to husband of 37 years – and we’re gone
She’s spoken, people.
Six family members returning from safari killed in head-on crash with teen driver
Six family members heading back from Fossil Rim Wildlife Center in Texas were killed in a head-on crash with a teen driver.
Nvidia profit bonanza drives global rally as stock markets ride AI wave
King Charles to appear on UK bank notes from June
‘A tremendous honour’ – Andy Farrell named as British and Irish Lions head coach for Australia series
He will lead the side Down Under in 2025.
Warren Buffett admits Berkshire’s days of ‘eye popping gains’ are over
FT.com Tweet
The Tech Titan Who Led His Company From a 68-Square-Foot Jail Cell
WSJ Business Tweet
Cliff Notes – Liverpool forward Diogo Jota, brother die in car crash – Spanish Civil Guard
- Diogo Jota, 28, and his brother André Silva, 25, were killed in a car crash near Zamora, Spain, with police investigating potential causes, including a blown tyre.
- Liverpool FC and the Portuguese Football Federation confirmed the tragic news, expressing their condolences and requesting privacy for the families involved.
Liverpool forward Diogo Jota, brother die in car crash – Spanish Civil Guard
Liverpool and Portugal forward Diogo Jota and his brother, André Silva, were killed in a car crash near Zamora, Spain, police said Thursday.
Liverpool FC, the Portuguese Prime Minister Luís Montenegro and Portuguese Football Federation (FPF) also confirmed the incident.
The Spanish Civil Guard confirmed to The Associated Press that Jota and his brother were found dead after their car went off a road on an isolated stretch of highway about an hour west of Zamora. Authorities said the car, a Lamborghini, according to police was in flames.
Firefighters were called in as the fire spread to nearby vegetation, authorities said.
Police were investigating the causes of the crash
Police were investigating the causes of the crash, which happened past midnight local time. They said there were no other vehicles involved. The bodies were undergoing forensic analysis.
It wasn’t clear who was driving the car. Police were looking into the hypothesis that the crash happened because of a blown tire.
Jota, who was 28, and his brother, who was 25, were both Portuguese players and the only ones in the car, police said.
Jota’s death comes weeks after he married Rute Cardoso and in a social media post wrote, “Yes to forever.” They have three children, the youngest born last year.
Diogo Jota made 182 appearances for Liverpool in five years at the club
A Civil Guard spokesperson told EU News that they believe the driver lost control of the car after a tire blew out.
The Spanish Civil Guard is one of the two national law enforcement agencies of Spain. They are a separate organisation from the police.
Jota, whose full name was Diogo José Teixeira da Silva, made 182 appearances for Liverpool since joining from Wolves in 2020. He lifted the Premier League title in May, having previously won the FA Cup and two Carabao Cups in his five years at the club.
Silva played with Portuguese club Penafiel in the lower divisions.
“Liverpool Football Club are devastated by the tragic passing of Diogo Jota,” the club said in a statement.
“Liverpool FC will be making no further comment at this time and request the privacy of Diogo and André’s family, friends, teammates and club staff is respected as they try to come to terms with an unimaginable loss.
“We will continue to provide them with our full support.”
The club also lowered its flag to half mast.
Tributes were laid at Anfield for Diogo Jota and his brother, André Silva
UEFA said its thoughts were with relatives, friends and teammates affected “by this heartbreaking loss.” It said a moment of silence will be observed at Euro 2025 matches on Thursday and Friday.
Jota began his career at Portuguese side Paços de Ferreira and also played at Atlético Madrid and FC Porto.
Jota also won 49 international caps for Portugal, during which he won the UEFA Nations League in 2019 and again last month, scoring 14 goals.
The FPF said in a statement: “The Portuguese Football Federation and the entire Portuguese football community are devastated by the deaths of Diogo Jota and André Silva in Spain this morning.
“Diogo Jota was not only a fantastic player with almost 50 caps for the national team, but also an extraordinary person who was respected by all his teammates and opponents. He had a contagious joy and was a reference point in his own community.
Diogo Jota married his longtime partner, Rute Cardoso, in a ceremony on June 22
“The Portuguese Football Federation would like to offer the deepest condolences to the families and friends of Diogo and André, as well as Liverpool FC and FC Penafiel, the respective clubs of the players.
“The Portuguese Football Federation has asked UEFA to hold a minute’s silence ahead of our national team’s match against Spain in the Women’s European Championship on Thursday.
“We have lost two champions. Their deaths represent irreparable losses for Portuguese football, and we will do everything we can to honour their legacy every day.”
The Liga Portugal and Atlético Madrid also paid tribute to the two players
Jota’s Portugal teammate, Cristiano Ronaldo, sent his condolences to the brothers’ family.
“It doesn’t make sense. We were just together with the national team, you had just gotten married,” Ronaldo wrote in Portuguese in a post on social media.
“To your family, your wife, and your children, I send my condolences and wish them all the strength in the world. I know you will always be with them. Rest in peace, Diogo and André. We will all miss you.”
Arguably the best tribute came from his former Liverpool teammate and Brazilian legend Roberto Firmino on Instagram whilst posting a carrousel of pictures for the duos relationship and partnership. Naming the children and family personally, was a special touch.
“When words fail, there are only inexpressible groans. And for that reason I get on my knees, praying that the Holy Spirit comforts the heart of Rute, Dinis, Duarte, Mafalda, Seu Joaquim, Lady Isabel and all the family and friends.
It was a privilege and an honor to have known and lived such special moments alongside you. Rest in Peace to my brother Jota, and Andre.”

Media Lens: Starmer announces £15 billion defence investment plan amid PMQs clash
Story focus: Keir Starmer announces £15 billion defence investment plan.
Primary entity: Keir Starmer | Region:
The main geographic focus is the United Kingdom (UK).
Keir Starmer has announced a £15 billion defence investment plan aimed at strengthening the UK’s military capabilities. This initiative reflects the Labour party’s commitment to enhancing national security in response to emerging global challenges.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
Keir Starmer announced a £15 billion defense investment plan as part of the UK’s strategy to bolster its military capabilities. The announcement emphasized the need for enhanced security in a rapidly changing global landscape, positioning the UK as a more proactive player in defense matters.
The plan will likely be discussed further during the Prime Minister’s Questions session, where Starmer is anticipated to face scrutiny from opponents. This investment is seen as a significant step toward addressing current and future defense challenges while ensuring the UK is well-prepared against potential threats.
Status quo
Keir Starmer, the UK Labour leader, recently announced a £15 billion defense investment plan. This initiative aims to enhance national security and modernize military capabilities. The announcement comes at a time of increasing global tensions and is part of a broader strategy to strengthen the UK’s defense posture. The funding is intended for various projects that support the military’s readiness and technological advancements.
Confirmed facts
- Keir Starmer announced a £15 billion defence investment plan.
- The plan aims to enhance the UK’s military capabilities.
- Starmer is set to face Kemi Badenoch at PMQs following the announcement.
- The investment forms part of a broader strategy for national security.
Preconceptions
- Al Jazeera prioritises the financial scale of the £15 billion defence investment, focusing on its immediate economic implications.
- BBC emphasises personal political dynamics, notably Starmer’s confrontation with Badenoch at PMQs, framing the announcement as part of broader political discourse rather than purely financial strategy.
- The Guardian critiques the investment plan in terms of national security, arguing for a strategic approach over dependence on external powers, showcasing a more cautionary editorial stance.
- Politico concentrates on the political accountability of regional leaders, specifically Burnham, suggesting that the burden of funding defence now lies with local governance, thus shifting focus from national to local responsibility.
Elisions
- Al Jazeera emphasizes Keir Starmer’s “£15 billion defence investment plan” while BBC refers to it as a “£300 billion” plan, highlighting a discrepancy in reported amounts for the same initiative.
- The Guardian focuses on the editorial stance against reliance on the US for security, while Politico’s coverage primarily discusses the political implications and responsibilities surrounding the defense funding.
- Al Jazeera’s report includes reactions from various political figures, whereas the BBC’s article is more focused on the specifics of Starmer’s proposals without much external commentary.
- The coverage from The Guardian articulates concerns over public dependency on military funding, a viewpoint less emphasized in the other sources, which concentrate on the governmental planning aspects of the defense investment.
One story, four angles
Al Jazeera – Keir Starmer announces 15 billion pound defence investment plan
Publication: Al Jazeera | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Low
Expand
Espresso Shot: The opening lede emphasizes Starmer’s financial commitment, framing the story around the scale of the investment—”15 billion pounds”— inviting immediate attention to fiscal implications.
Key differences:
1. **Comparison:** Compared to the Guardian, which emphasizes the broader context of UK security, Al Jazeera focuses primarily on the monetary aspect, e.g., “15 billion pounds for defense.”
2. **Example:** Their lead places significant weight on the actual figure, engaging readers with the financial implications rather than political ramifications.
3. **Placement:** The investment number is prioritized right at the beginning, ensuring readers absorb the financial stakes first.
Bias: Selection: Focus solely on financial investments rather than strategic details. | Language: Uses straightforward financial terms, lacking nuance on potential impacts. | Omission: Neglects to discuss any opposition or varying perspectives on the plan.
Assessment: Readers are likely to believe that the primary concern is the substantial financial commitment being made to defense.
BBC – Starmer to face Badenoch at PMQs after announcing £15bn extra defence spending
Publication: BBC | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The headline draws attention to a political duel at PMQs post-announcement, placing a direct focus on both the spending and its political consequences.
Key differences:
1. **Comparison:** Unlike Al Jazeera focusing on the financial aspect, BBC presents a dual narrative—fiscal decision coupled with immediate political fallout, e.g., “Starmer to face Badenoch.”
2. **Example:** The mention of PMQs in the title suggests a developing political drama, prompting readers to consider ramifications beyond mere spending.
3. **Placement:** The framing around the political event happens right after the financial detail, ensuring readers are aware of ongoing political dynamics.
Bias: Selection: Highlights political conflict that may distract from the core financial details. | Language: The term “duel” suggests an adversarial framing. | Omission: Does not reflect potential public concerns or benefits related to the budget.
Assessment: Readers might first perceive that while the announcement is about spending, the overshadowing story is the political confrontation it triggers.
The Guardian – The Guardian view on the defence investment plan: the UK needs security, not dependency on a wayward US | Editorial
Publication: The Guardian | Intensity: (9/10) | Sentiment: Critical | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The editorial stance prioritizes security discourse, challenging dependency, leading readers quickly into a broader concern regarding national security strategy.
Key differences:
1. **Comparison:** Contrasting with Al Jazeera’s focus on financial figures, The Guardian emphasizes a security critique, e.g., “needs security, not dependency,” inviting a reflective engagement.
2. **Example:** The phrase “wayward US” connotes distrust and prompts consideration about international relations, steering readers away from mere financial implications.
3. **Placement:** The editorial framework frames the spending plan as a critique on strategy and foreign policy rather than just a financial decision.
Bias: Selection: Chooses critical stance on foreign dependency rather than purely describing events. | Language: Uses charged terms like “wayward” to convey urgency and distrust. | Omission: Lacks emphasis on the financial aspect in favor of strategic critique.
Assessment: Readers may initially believe the spending is more an issue of strategy than a mere fiscal allocation.
Politico – Starmer to Burnham: It’s your job to fund defense now
Publication: Politico | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The headline frames a direct accountability conversation around defense funding, prompting readers to focus on political responsibility and inter-party dynamics.
Key differences:
1. **Comparison:** While the Guardian critiques broader strategy, Politico focuses on individual accountability, e.g., “It’s your job to fund defense now,” casting a spotlight on inter-party relations.
2. **Example:** The accountability framing addresses intra-party responsibilities, suggesting a dynamic political landscape rather than just a static analysis.
3. **Placement:** The title places emphasis on political dialogue, ensuring the focus remains on ongoing conflicts rather than only financial implications.
Bias: Selection: Highlights only party challenges, missing external strategic implications. | Language: Uses compelling language of responsibility and urgency. | Omission: Lacks commentary on potential ramifications for voters.
Assessment: Readers might first recognize that the debate over defense funding is framed as a political contest rather than purely a fiscal decision.
Al Jazeera presents Keir Starmer’s defense investment plan with a strong emphasis on the financial scope of £15 billion, reflecting a straightforward reporting style. In contrast, the BBC escalates the framing by focusing on political implications, suggesting upcoming confrontations at PMQs, therefore highlighting potential governmental tensions. Politico frames the issue yet more escalatory by attributing responsibility for defense funding to specific opponents, intensifying the sense of urgency and accountability. Meanwhile, The Guardian adds a critical lens, questioning the dependency on foreign powers. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
Al Jazeera
UK’s Starmer announces 300-billion-pound defence investment plan
BBC
Starmer to face Badenoch at PMQs after announcing £15bn extra defence spending
The Guardian
politico.eu
What to Watch
Amazon prime - TV & Netflix
What to Watch
Love Sports
What’s going on?
Keir Starmer announced a £15 billion defence investment plan in a bid to enhance the UK’s military capabilities. The announcement aims to ensure the country’s defence budget remains robust in an increasingly uncertain global landscape. This investment is part of Starmer’s broader commitment to national security.
Al Jazeera reported, “UK’s Starmer announces £15bn defence investment plan,” focusing directly on the financial commitment. In contrast, BBC’s headline, “Starmer to face Badenoch at PMQs after announcing £15bn extra defence spending,” highlights the political ramifications, emphasising the ensuing parliamentary dynamics. This framing creates different perceptions of priorities—financial planning versus political accountability.
Coverage analysed: Al Jazeera | BBC | The Guardian | Politico
- Readers Digest
-
7
-
User Ratings (2 Votes)
5.9
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.


