Year: 2026

The US Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday regarding Boulder’s lawsuit against Exxon and Suncor Energy, which seeks to hold the companies accountable for climate change effects. Justice Samuel Alito’s recusal may lead to a 4-4 deadlock, preserving the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that permits the case to proceed.

Alina Koushyk, Editor-in-chief of Belsat, insists that journalism is not a crime despite the Belarusian regime labelling her a “terrorist.” Press freedom in Belarus remains under severe threat, with many Belsat journalists imprisoned, highlighting the ongoing crackdown on dissent in the country.

What’s happening?
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently hearing a significant lawsuit concerning climate change and the responsibility of oil companies. This case aims to determine whether these companies can be held accountable for their contributions to climate change, amid rising global temperatures and extreme weather events.

In analyzing different headlines, NBC News states, “New Supreme Court term begins with justices stumped by climate change case,” while The New York Times headlines it as, “A Supreme Court Battle Over Climate Change Begins.” The NBC framing emphasizes the justices’ confusion as a key point, suggesting uncertainty in the judicial process, whereas The New York Times portrays the case as a “battle,” indicating a more combative interpretation that focuses on the potential implications of the lawsuit for climate policies and regulation. This distinction highlights differing approaches to judicial proceedings versus the broader socio-political impacts of the case.

Coverage analyzed: NBC News | The New York Times | The Washington Post | CNN