Some MPs want to stop the European Court of Human Rights’ laws ‘superseding British law’, while others have demanded safe routes for migrants (Picture: PA)

The prime minister is braced for what could be the biggest Conservative rebellion of his premiership so far as his Illegal Migration Bill takes centre stage in the Commons.

The controversial legislation designed to clamp down on asylum seekers travelling to the UK in small boats has left human rights organisations deeply concerned – but many Conservative MPs believe it doesn’t go far enough.

Around 60 Tories are predicted to back an amendment that will block the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) from preventing removals from taking place.

Meanwhile, others have called for Rishi Sunak to commit to establishing safe routes which people in desperate situations can use to come to Britain.

Downing Street officials will meet with a gang of rebels on Monday in an attempt to calm the revolt.

Two days of debate are expected as the Bill reaches its committee stage today, with more than 50 pages of amendments tabled.

Under the legislation’s current proposals, it would see asylum seekers arriving through unauthorised means being detained without bail or judicial review for 28 days.

They will then be ‘swiftly removed’ to their home country or a ‘safe third country’ such as Rwanda.

Tory Devizes MP Danny Kruger has sponsored an amendment that seeks provisions in the Bill to ‘operate notwithstanding any orders of the Strasbourg court or any other international body’.

Former minister Andrea Jenkyns tweeted that she had signed amendments with the intention of ‘strengthening the Bill and stopping the European Court of Human Rights’ laws superseding British law’.

It comes after the ECHR last year granted an injunction, via its Rule 39, that effectively grounded a flight sending asylum seekers from the UK to Rwanda.

Since then, Home Secretary Suella Braverman has held what she called ‘constructive’ negotiations with the Strasbourg court to secure a higher legal threshold for any injunction under Rule 39 to be imposed on any future deportation flights.

Levelling-Up Secretary Michael Gove has signalled Home Office ministers are open to further talks about the strength of the Bill, as MPs prepare to go through the legislation line by line.

Thousands risk their lives to come across the Channel in small boats (Picture: SNMS)

A Home Office source said the legislation contains a ‘marker clause’ relating to ECHR deportation orders.

It is understood the clause allows for initial negotiations with Strasbourg to conclude before ministers consider setting out further legal measures.

Mr Sunak and Ms Braverman have both stressed that they think the draft law complies with international obligations and that Britain would not need to exit the European Convention on Human Rights to introduce the plans.

But in a letter to MPs following publication of the Bill earlier this month, the Home Secretary admitted there is a ‘more (than) 50% chance’ her legislation may not be compatible with the convention.

While some Tories look to ‘toughen up’ the already highly divisive legalisation, others have backed an amendment that would force the Home Secretary to declare ‘safe and legal routes by which asylum seekers can enter’ the UK.

Tory MP Tim Loughton’s proposed modification has been signed by former Brexit secretary David Davis and Dame Diana Johnson, the Labour chairwoman of the Home Affairs Select Committee.

The government’s approach has been slammed by groups including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, which has accused ministers of ‘extinguishing the right to seek refugee protection in the UK’.

The charity Refugee Action warned it would ’cause misery, cost millions to the taxpayer and drive desperate people to take ever more dangerous journeys’, while the Archbishop of York described the bill as ‘cruelty without purpose’.

Hundreds of protestors gathered outside Parliament to demonstrate against the Bill earlier in March.

Downing Street said last night that Mr Sunak is continuing to engage with backbenchers over the legislation’s proposals.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at [email protected].

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Some MPs want to stop the European Court of Human Rights’ laws ‘superseding British law’, while others have demanded safe routes for migrants.