The Spending Review leads Wednesday’s newspaper front pages with the left-leaning press celebrating the investment into the country – including billions of pounds being put into social housing and the NHS. Almost £90 billion is set to go to science and tech and the U-turn on winter fuel is continuing to be praised.
There’s a more cautious and sceptical tone from the right-leaning press who see the chancellor’s U-turn on winter fuel as evidence she is unable to do her job – and in regards to the spending review, they are concerned about how the country will pay for the investments, suggesting tax rises are set for the Autumn budget.
The Financial Times says the chancellor will release £39bn for affordable housing, saying the money is “the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation,” according to the Treasury. But the shadow chancellor says the plan will increase debt and taxes will rise in the autumn budget.
This headline uses positive framing to cast Rachel Reeves as a proactive leader, putting a large £39bn housing plan “at the heart” of efforts to “renew Britain.” The emotive language suggests ambition and national improvement, while downplaying potential criticisms or challenges. It’s a classic agenda-setting tactic, steering focus towards a bold, feel-good policy.
The i Paper says the chancellor’s plans for a programme to boost social and affordable homes for 10 years instead of five years, calling it a win for the deputy PM.
This headline contrasts two stories to stir emotion and potentially sow division. “Rayner forces” suggests internal pressure or conflict within Labour, while the phrase “as asylum seekers face hotel eviction” adds a sharp, possibly provocative juxtaposition. The structure implies a trade-off or tension between domestic housing priorities and migrant support, a common tactic to frame complex issues in a more dramatic, polarising way.
The Daily Mirror says the chancellor’s £39 billion package will “turn the tide” on an affordable housing crisis. It comes as the Government pushes to meet its pledge to build 1.5 million homes by the next election.
This headline uses bold, simplified language to grab attention and convey a sense of urgency and scale. Words like “BOOST” and “£39 BILLION” are capitalised for impact, presenting the policy as a major win. However, it lacks nuance—there’s no mention of timelines, challenges, or context—favouring a punchy, feel-good narrative often seen in tabloid-style reporting.
The Daily Mail says the chancellor has been “rocked” by a “jobs slump” ahead of the review. The paper says as the chancellor prepares “to take a gamble on the nation’s finances with a giant spending spree,” the paper cites figures that show 250,000 jobs “have gone” since her Budget last year.
This headline uses dramatic, emotive language—“ROCKED” suggests shock or crisis—to frame Reeves as under pressure or failing. It’s a common tactic to personalise economic issues and heighten political drama, even if the wider context is more complex. The alliteration also adds to its punchy, tabloid-style impact.
Daily Express leads with a call for the chancellor to “scrap the rural inheritance raid” – the changes to inheritance tax she announced last year – after she made a U-turn on scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners.
These headlines use populist, rallying language—“victory,” “raid,” and “COME ON RACHEL”—to frame the issue emotionally and create a sense of ongoing battle. They suggest the government is punishing ordinary rural families, casting policy as an attack (“raid”) and urging a dramatic reversal (“U-TURN”). It’s a classic tabloid technique, using direct appeals and simplified framing to stir reader sentiment and pressure politicians.
Copyright WTX News 2025