- Cycling advocates call for improved safety measures after Halifax cyclist’s death
- Hegseth and Caine to testify before Senate panel amid Iran war escalation
- British woman jailed in Dubai for £19,000 unpaid rent shares cell with murderers
- European Commission to fine Google under Digital Markets Act for €1 billion
- Trump threatens retaliation as US conducts new strikes against Iran
- Iran conflict prompts economists to examine broader economic indicators beyond stock markets
- Administration advises Calgary to increase funding for Werklund Centre upgrade
- New York Times seeks to quash subpoenas for reporters’ phone records
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Cycling advocates call for improved safety measures after Halifax cyclist’s death
Get you up to speed: Cycling advocates urge stronger safety measures after Halifax man dies in ‘dooring’ incident
A 71-year-old cyclist in Halifax died after colliding with a vehicle door. The incident has prompted renewed discussions regarding road safety measures.
Halifax police are investigating the incident, but no further details have been released regarding their findings. The incident has prompted advocacy groups to demand enhanced safety protocols for cyclists in urban areas.
Officials in Halifax are urging immediate action to enhance road safety following the tragic death of a 71-year-old cyclist. Advocates are calling for more stringent regulations to protect cyclists, while local authorities are expected to review safety protocols and implement measures aimed at preventing similar incidents in the future.
What remains unclear — It is not specified what specific safety measures are being proposed in response to the incident.
Cycling advocates call for improved safety measures after Halifax cyclist’s death

The death of a 71-year-old Halifax cyclist who collided with a vehicle door is renewing calls for improved safety measures on the road.
Hegseth and Caine to testify before Senate panel amid Iran war escalation
Get you up to speed: Hegseth and Caine to testify before Senate panel amid escalating Iran war
Two U.S. soldiers were killed in an Iranian attack while another service member died in Iraq during a controlled explosion related to an Iranian drone, amid heightened military tensions in the region. The total number of U.S. service members killed since the start of the conflict in February has reached 17.
During the upcoming hearing, the Pentagon will respond to funding requests totalling $67 billion to aid ongoing military operations, following a cumulative cost of approximately $25 billion since the war’s start in February. Senate leaders, including Sen. Patty Murray, are expected to scrutinise the Pentagon’s funding needs amid concerns over previous expenditures and potential third reconciliation efforts in the Senate.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine will testify before a Senate committee on Tuesday to discuss a $67 billion supplemental funding request, highlighting the war’s escalating costs following recent fatalities among U.S. soldiers. Senator Patty Murray is set to challenge this request, stating, “The American people want to see a quick and strategic end to this war, not $70 billion of their tax dollars sent to keep it going.”
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether the Senate will approve the proposed $67 billion funding request for the Pentagon amid ongoing conflict and questions about reconciliation processes.
Hegseth and Caine to testify before Senate panel amid Iran war escalation
Washington — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will testify before a Senate committee Tuesday amid escalations in the war with Iran in recent days.
With a focus on the Trump administration’s supplemental funding request, the hearing comes as at least two U.S. soldiers were killed in an Iranian attack Friday, while another service member died in Iraq during a controlled explosion to destroy an Iranian drone. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 2:30 p.m.
The deaths bring the total number of service members killed since the war began in February to 17. Nearly 100 American service members have been injured in multiple Iranian strikes on bases across the Middle East this month, officials told WTX US News. Meanwhile, the U.S. carried out a 10th consecutive night of strikes on Iranian military infrastructure Monday, after a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran collapsed.
Hegseth and Caine last testified about the war at hearings in May, not long after the pair delivered their most recent public briefing to the press. On Tuesday, they’re tasked with defending the administration’s request for $67 billion for the Pentagon to help cover the cost of the war.
Last month, the administration asked Congress for $88 billion, with the bulk of the funds aimed at covering the cost of the conflict, including $21 billion for munitions, $17.3 billion for operational costs and $12.1 billion for classified programs. The long-anticipated supplemental funding package also included a request for funds for efforts to combat the Ebola outbreak in African countries, along with $11.1 billion for farm aid. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins will testify alongside Hegseth and Caine Tuesday as they make a pitch for the additional funds.
Hegseth and Caine testified before House and Senate Appropriations subcommittees in May as the Pentagon sought $1.5 trillion in the fiscal year 2027 budget proposal. In late April, a defense official testified alongside Hegseth that the war had cost about $25 billion.
The leaders will almost certainly face questions about the latest figures during Tuesday’s hearing. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the committee, will highlight the cost of the war, according to a Democratic committee aide, while emphasizing the funds the Pentagon already received in the GOP’s “one big, beautiful bill” last year.
“The American people want to see a quick and strategic end to this war, not $70 billion of their tax dollars sent to keep it going,” Murray will say in her opening remarks.
But the pushback could come from Republicans as well. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the committee, has been among a handful of Republicans to cross the aisle in support of resolutions to rein in Mr. Trump’s war powers in Iran. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska also sits on the committee and has likewise voted with Democrats on the war powers resolutions.
House Republicans have been pursuing the funds for the Pentagon through the budget reconciliation process, which allows the party in power to approve measures with direct budgetary consequences without help from across the aisle. But a number of key GOP senators, including Collins and Murkowski, have cast doubt on the prospects of a third reconciliation bill in the Senate. And Majority Leader John Thune has remained noncommittal.
Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said last week that reconciliation “is very different in the House than it is in the Senate,” noting that GOP members in the upper chamber will want to have input. He pointed to the overall figures for the Defense and Agriculture departments, possible offsets for the funds, and the Senate’s restrictions over what can make it into a reconciliation package as possible hurdles.
“I’ve said all along … that it’s an option,” Thune said. “But it’s not, certainly, the only option.”
British woman jailed in Dubai for £19,000 unpaid rent shares cell with murderers
Get you up to speed: British woman jailed in Dubai over £19,000 unpaid rent shared cell with murderers | News World
Kerry Nwachukwu, a 44-year-old British businesswoman, was detained in Dubai over nearly £20,000 in unpaid rent, triggering travel bans until the debt is settled. She was arrested on April 22 while at a shopping mall and subsequently held in Al Awir Central Jail for two weeks.
Kerry Nwachukwu faces ongoing legal proceedings and is unable to renew her UAE business licence due to her debt situation. Her financial crisis intensified after she incurred £19,000 in rent arrears, following substantial unpaid client contracts, and she is currently at risk of re-arrest if her debts remain unpaid.
Kerry Nwachukwu’s situation has elicited a response from her friends and family, who have initiated a GoFundMe page to assist with her debts and living expenses, although using the platform could bring legal repercussions in Dubai. Meanwhile, her lawyer suggested that raising £4,000 could potentially lead to the cancellation of her current arrest warrant, but the outcome remains uncertain.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether raising £4,000 will guarantee the cancellation of Kerry Nwachukwu’s arrest warrant.
British woman jailed in Dubai for £19,000 unpaid rent shares cell with murderers

Kerry Nwachukwu cannot leave the United Arab Emirates until her £19,000 debt has been paid off (Picture: Kennedy)
A crowdfunder has been started for a British businesswoman who ended up in a Dubai jail over nearly £20,000 of unpaid rent.
Kerry Nwachukwu, 44, from London, is unable to leave the UAE after travel bans were imposed on her until she pays her debts to two landlords.
She moved to the city in August 2022 with her son John, 25, to set up a marketing agency after giving up her job as marketing director at Sotheby’s.
But by late 2024 and into 2025, she entered a legal and financial crisis over two separate Rental Dispute Centre cases.
Kerry got £19,000 into rent arrears with two landlords after more than £10,000 in client contracts went unpaid.
Because of the legal proceedings against her, she has been unable to renew her UAE business licence since January, while her financial situation has also been worsened by the war in the Middle East.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
On April 22 this year, unaware an arrest warrant had already been issued against her, she was detained in a shopping mall on her way back from speaking to a rental clerk.
She was taken to Bur Dubai police station where she was held for two weeks before being sent to Al Awir Central Jail.
She said: ‘It’s a criminal offence when I don’t pay rent, but when businesses don’t pay people, there is no legal consequence at all.’
Describing conditions in the prison, Kerry said she didn’t initially have a mattress, almost got into fights and met ‘so many dangerous characters.’

Kerry moved to Dubai in 2022 to set up a marketing agency – but with creditors not paying what they owe, she got into rent arrears (Picture: Kennedy)
What little cash she had, she spent £3 on a pair of slippers to avoid walking on urine in the toilets because other inmates peed on the floor.
She said: ‘I was put inside with people who’ve murdered people. I was in one cell with people who were selling drugs.
‘How is that even possible? Just for not paying your rent, you are thrown into a horrible, horrible jail.
‘I became a person that I don’t want to be – it’s terrifying I could not sleep every night, I was feeling somebody’s going to jump at me.’
She paid £3,000 to be released in mid-May under a 15-month repayment plan after repeated requests from her son.
However, the same judge reversed that decision three weeks later and gave her 15 days to repay instead.
That period is now up and Kerry, who warns about the dark side of the ‘glitz and glamour’ of living in Dubai, fears she could be arrested at any moment.
Her lawyer has told her that if she can raise £4,000 it may convince the judge to cancel the current arrest warrant, but even this is not guaranteed.

Kerry’s son John requested her release nine times before she was freed – but she still faces potential arrest(Picture: Kennedy)
Ultimately she wants to return home to the UK.
She said: ‘If I had any means to literally pay the courts today, I’ll be on a plane straight out of here.
‘I would not even look back. All my stuff is in storage, I’ll get a courier to bring it to the UK. I’ll literally just run out with my two suitcases and I won’t even look back.’
Her friends and family in the UK have set up a GoFundMe page to help cover day-to-day living costs and rent while repaying the two separate rental installment plans – which are each tied to their own travel ban.
However, Kerry adds that GoFundMe is not an authorised platform in Dubai – and using it could also lead to legal consequences.
‘I may end up with another judgment against me, another prison sentence, just for my family helping me out with GoFundMe,’ Kerry says.
Before all of this, she started writing a book about building her business – but she now wants to base it on her detention story.
She concluded: ‘People need to know the story of a businesswoman by herself, trying to build somewhere where actually the law can be very dangerous and people don’t forgive you.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
European Commission to fine Google under Digital Markets Act for €1 billion
European Commission to fine Google under Digital Markets Act for €1 billion
The European Commission is expected to announce a potential fine of one billion euros for Google under the Digital Markets Act regarding market power abuse.
A potential fine of one billion euros represents a significant enforcement of the Digital Markets Act, highlighting the EU’s commitment to regulating market power and fostering competition.
“The Commission is committed to ensuring fair competition and will take necessary actions against any abuse of market power,” stated an EU spokesperson regarding the impending fine for Google.
Brussels prepares first digital rulebook fine against Google, risking Trump’s ire: media reports

Published on •Updated
The European Commission is expected to announce the first fine for search engine company Google as part of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), German financial newspaper Handelsblatt reports.
Citing two anonymous, high-ranking EU officials, the paper said the potential one billion euro fine will be announced on Thursday, and relates to two main proceedings concerning the abuse of market power.
The first case reportedly concerns whether Google favours its own services in online searches, while the second case reportedly centres on Google allegedly preventing app developers from advertising downloading options outside the Google Play Store.
The precise amount of the fine would be decided at a College of Commissioners which brings together the executive led by Ursula von der Leyen.
The Commission launched both proceedings in March 2024.
Google has not publicly responded to Handelsblatt’s reports, and the European Commission’s spokespersons service did not respond to EU News’ request for comment at the time of publication.
The reported fine sits under the DMA umbrella, which requires all technology companies operating in the EU to participate in competition in a bid to give users more choice.
The DMA legislation been strongly criticised by US President Donald Trump’s administration in the past, with Washington previously accusing Brussels of unfairly targeting American companies.
The news comes days after the European Commission ordered Google to share search data with rival search engines from January 2027 and to open its Android operating system to competing AI services as part of DMA regulation.
At the time, the EU’s tech chief Henna Virkkunen said this will allow EU users to enjoy “greater choice” of services.
Google’s head of global affairs, Kent Walker, said the EU move risked “undermining vital privacy and security guardrails for millions of Europeans”.
Fines for violating the DMA can stretch as far as 10 percent of a company’s total global turnover.
Google’s parent company, Alphabet, generated a record annual turnover of $402.8 billion (€353.08 billion) in 2025.
Trump threatens retaliation as US conducts new strikes against Iran
Media Lens: Trump threatens retaliation as US conducts new strikes against Iran
Trump vows revenge on Iran.
Isabella Gonzales, a 19-year-old Army private from Carrollton, was killed in an Iranian strike on Jordan. Coverage in AP News and NBC News reports that this strike has heightened concerns about U.S. military involvement in the region.
What happened
Isabella Gonzales, a 19-year-old Army private from Carrollton, was killed in an Iranian strike on Jordan, according to the Pentagon. The incident highlights ongoing tensions in the region and the impact on American military personnel.
In response to escalating violence, former President Trump has vowed to retaliate against Iran if additional U.S. soldiers are harmed. This statement adds to the ongoing discussions surrounding U.S. military involvement in the Middle East.
Key facts
- Isabella Gonzales, a 19-year-old Army private from Carrollton, was killed in an Iranian strike in Jordan.
- The Pentagon confirmed her death in a statement released yesterday.
- Former President Trump has vowed revenge on Iran following the strike.
- The U.S. has conducted multiple military strikes against Iran in response to recent attacks.
Where coverage differs
- NBC News emphasizes Trump’s revenge rhetoric against Iran, while CBS News focuses on the identity and story of the soldier killed in the strike.
- The New York Times foregrounds the broader context of lives lost rather than individual narratives, while AP News prioritizes military actions and threats from Trump over personal stories.
- NBC News highlights the repercussions of the conflict, while AP News emphasizes immediate news about military strikes.
One story, four angles
CBS News – Isabella Gonzales, 19-year-old Army private from Carrollton, killed in Iranian strike on Jordan, Pentagon says
Publication: CBS News | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: somber | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article reports the tragic death of Isabella Gonzales, an Army private, highlighting the personal impact of military actions involving Iran and the Pentagon. The focus is on the consequences of geopolitical tensions and their human toll.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is on the identification and mourning of a specific young soldier.
Framing analysis: The article foregrounds the emotional impact of war through the personal story of a soldier, while the broader context of military conflict serves as a secondary concern.
Bias: Selection: Focus on an individual story of loss, Language: Emotional descriptors like “killed” and “tragedy” enhance personal connection, Omission: Lack of broader geopolitical analysis or discussion of military actions involved.
Assessment: This report effectively personalizes the consequences of military conflict, engaging readers emotionally by highlighting the loss of a young soldier.
AP News – US strikes Iran again as Trump threatens retribution if more US soldiers are killed
Publication: AP News | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: urgent | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article reports on renewed military strikes against Iran by the US, following escalating threats from Trump about further retaliation. It emphasizes the political motivations behind military actions and the resulting tensions.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the political motives and consequences of US military decisions regarding Iran.
Framing analysis: The article foregrounds the political implications of military actions and threats, overshadowing individual consequences that arise from such decisions.
Bias: Selection: Highlights government perspectives and military decisions, Language: Use of strong words like “strikes” and “threatens,” Omission: Limited discussion on civilian impacts of these military actions.
Assessment: The report underscores the high-stakes political nature of US-Iran relations while prioritizing political narratives over human consequences.
The New York Times – Lives Lost
Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: moral | Tone: reflective | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: This piece reflects on the lives lost in recent conflicts, imparting a moral perspective on the human cost of war. It prompts readers to consider the ethical implications of ongoing military actions.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is on ethical reflections regarding the loss of life amid conflict.
Framing analysis: It foregrounds moral considerations and ethical questions concerning military actions, while details of political strategies serve as a backdrop.
Bias: Selection: Highlights human stories amid conflict, Language: Descriptive language invokes empathy, Omission: Specific political discussions may be minimized.
Assessment: The article effectively engages moral reasoning regarding the impacts of war, prioritizing the human aspect over political narratives.
Food for thought
NBC News employs a strong legal framing by outlining President Trump’s legal obligations under international law regarding Iranian responses, emphasizing the legitimacy of military action in self-defense. In contrast, AP News adopts a more escalatory framing, portraying the situation as a potential tipping point for broader conflict, emphasizing Trump’s threat of retribution against Iran as a point of escalating tension. While NBC offers a structured analysis of legal parameters, AP evokes images of impending warfare, suggesting a more urgent assessment of military actions and their consequences. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Iran conflict prompts economists to examine broader economic indicators beyond stock markets
Get you up to speed: Iran war: Look beyond stocks to understand state of economy, experts say
Yields on 10-year US Treasury bills have risen nearly 60 basis points since the US-Israel war on Iran began in late February, reaching 4.6 percent. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has led to rising oil prices, with Brent crude reaching $91.42 a barrel before dropping to $88.04 on Monday.
Markets have reacted to the ongoing situation, with the S&P 500 down 0.81 per cent over the past month and the Nasdaq-100 declining by 5.66 per cent. Economists warn that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz may escalate food security risks, particularly for developing countries in Africa and South America during the Southern Hemisphere’s sowing season.
The US Treasury yields have increased nearly 60 basis points since the beginning of the war on Iran, signalling heightened inflation expectations among investors and making borrowing more expensive for businesses. Economists warn of rising food insecurity due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which could dramatically impact developing nations as energy prices soar, and highlight that the situation depends on the duration of supply shortages.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how long the closures in the Strait of Hormuz will persist and their potential impact on global food security.
Iran conflict prompts economists to examine broader economic indicators beyond stock markets
EDITOR’S ANALYSISEconomy|US-Israel war on IranIran war: Look beyond stocks to understand state of economy, experts say
Yields on 10-year US Treasury bills, a bellwether for inflation, are up nearly 60 basis points since the start of the war on Iran.
Published On 21 Jul 202621 Jul 2026
The US-Israel war on Iran is escalating again and oil prices are on the rise, but experts say the real clues to the state of the economy lie beyond indices and those price points.
“The markets have been somewhat quiescent in the last month or two, but have changed since the war in Iran began,” said Michael Klein, professor of international economic affairs at Tufts’ Fletcher School.
Yields on the 10-year United States Treasury bills, for instance, are up nearly 60 basis points since the start of the war on Iran in late February to 4.6 percent on Monday. That is the highest level the yields, a bellwether for inflation, have reached in the past year, Klein said, making it more expensive for businesses to borrow money and slowing the economy.
“Interest rates on bonds will incorporate inflation rate because lenders, when they get paid back, they want to be covered for erosion of their money, which happens through inflation,” Klein said.
It also shows that investors are expecting inflation to rise more as the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint through which 20 percent of the world’s oil travelled before the war, continues to remain practically closed after a brief respite when cargo flows picked up in the days after the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding to extend their ceasefire.
That brief opening up was reflected in consumer prices, which were down 0.4 percent in June on a monthly basis. That was led by a decline in energy prices, including a 9.7 percent drop in oil prices, according to the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI).
But a month after the MoU was signed, and days after it seemed to fall apart, the benchmark Brent crude reached $91.42 a barrel on Sunday, before falling on Monday to $88.04. The US national average price at the pump for a gallon (3.78 litres) of petrol was at $4, up from $3.87 a week ago.
“Markets are forward-looking. People are discounting what Trump is saying about the war because he says one thing one day and another day another,” Klein told WTX News.
Traders now see a 55 percent chance of a quarter-percentage point interest rate hike in the US in September, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool.
Rachel Ziemba, adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, agrees that the past month “has gone from overoptimism of what the oil flows will be” as oil prices sold off even before the MoU was signed and on the back of some increase in volumes, to a “correction in the last week as the MoU was falling apart and risk of conflict was increasing”.
In the period before and after the signing of the agreement on June 17, there was more oil than tankers to carry it as trapped vessels exited the Strait of Hormuz, bringing prices lower. “That was not commensurate with longer-term fundamentals,” said Ziemba.
But now, with short-term supplies having dwindled, prices are on the rise again.
“Oil products like gasoline and diesel are in shorter supply than crude oil, and that’s where consumers will feel the pinch because you can’t run a tractor or a car on crude oil,” she said.
Apart from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, globally some big refineries are also producing less.
For instance, refineries in the Middle East are producing at a much lower capacity because of damage from Iranian attacks. Similarly, Russian refineries too have taken a hit from Ukrainian drones and are producing less.
“Even when crude oil prices dipped, oil product prices hadn’t come down as much because of these shortages,” Ziemba told WTX News.
Government help priced in
Against that backdrop, the S&P 500 has fallen 0.81 percent in the past month, the Nasdaq-100 is down 5.66 percent, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up 0.53 percent at 51,839 points, having hit a peak of 53,055 points on July 6.
“Equities have been relatively stable,” said Mariano Torras, chair of the department of finance and economics at Adelphi University. “There’s a great risk that things could get so much worse and there would be consequences for food and security globally, but markets don’t seem to be factoring in these long-term risks.”
Economists are sounding the alarm on food security because with the strait closed, prices of energy-intensive commodities like fertilisers will soar. As the Southern Hemisphere goes into its sowing season, developing countries in Africa and South America, especially, will be hit hardest. Even for countries like India, which is a big consumer of fertilisers per crop produced, this could add to food inflation, Ziemba said.
“The impact will depend on how long the shortages go,” she said. “The best case scenario is higher prices than last year. The worst case, however, is extensive blockage, coupled with droughts elsewhere in the world.”
Torras agreed that parts of the world could be staring at a “grave situation”. But that was not reflected in the stock markets.
“There’s just this presumption that everything will be all right because the government and the US Federal Reserve will step in and help out as they have in the past,” he said, referring to past instances of that including the East Asia crisis of the late 1990s, the 2008 financial crisis in the US as well as the helping hand provided by several central banks during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many slashed interest rates to help businesses.
“Wall Street is pricing in their expectations that they will receive assistance from the government because if there’s too much of a shock, everyone loses and something has to be done. They are pricing that in,” said Torras.
Fletcher School’s Klein agrees.
“Markets go up, and markets go down. It’s a mistake to focus too much on daily or weekly or even monthly fluctuations. As the economist John Maynard Keynes said, markets respond to people’s views. It’s a herd mentality.”
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.









