- Milo Yiannopoulos deported after immigration arrest for visa overstay
- Florida man convicted for smuggling nearly $1 million in aircraft parts to Russia
- Iceland sees higher voter turnout in EU referendum than 2024 elections
- Hollywood seeks support from Trump in push for industry reforms
- Mladic dies, prompting reflections on his legacy and ongoing fascism
- Poll indicates strong Canadian backing for ending U.S. trade talks and tariffs
- Trump announces US majority control of over 60 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil reserves
- Bereaved families call on government to prevent early release of killers
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Milo Yiannopoulos deported after immigration arrest for visa overstay
Get you up to speed: Far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos deported after U.S. immigration arrest, officials say
Milo Yiannopoulos was deported from the United States on Friday after being arrested a day earlier at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport for overstaying his visa. His deportation follows a final order of removal issued by an immigration judge on July 22 after he failed to attend an immigration hearing.
Milo Yiannopoulos was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport on Thursday before his deportation on Friday. An immigration judge had issued a final order of removal on July 22 after Yiannopoulos failed to attend a scheduled hearing.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed that Milo Yiannopoulos was deported after an immigration judge ordered his removal due to his failure to attend a hearing. DHS underscored its commitment to reversing previous leniencies in immigration enforcement, stating, “Under President Trump, DHS will no longer tolerate this.”
What remains unclear — It is not clear how Yiannopoulos’ deportation will affect his political activities and associations in the UK.
Milo Yiannopoulos deported after immigration arrest for visa overstay
Jacob Rosen
Justice Department Reporter
Jake Rosen is a reporter covering the Department of Justice. He was previously a campaign digital reporter covering President Trump’s 2024 campaign and also served as an associate producer for “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”
Read Full Bio
/ WTX US News
Far-right political commentator and deportation advocate Milo Yiannopoulos was deported Friday, a day after his arrest by immigration authorities for overstaying his visa, U.S. officials said Saturday.
Yiannopoulos, who is British, was returned to his home country on Friday after being accused of overstaying his visa after entering the country legally in May 2019, a U.S. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said. An immigration judge had issued a final order of removal on July 22 after he failed to show up for an immigration hearing.
Yiannopoulos was arrested Thursday at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport in Louisiana and detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“DHS reversed the horrendous Biden-era policy that allowed aliens in our country illegally to jet around our country. Under President Trump, DHS will no longer tolerate this,” the DHS spokesperson said in a statement. “This administration is working diligently to ensure that aliens in our country illegally can no longer fly unless it is out of our country to self-deport.”
Reports indicated that Yiannopoulos was in New Orleans ahead of a concert by the formerly known as Kanye West. Yiannopoulos has done work for the political and corporate ambitions of West, who’s now known as Ye.
Yiannopoulos, who was banned from Twitter for several years for hateful attacks against comedian Leslie Jones, is a well-known champion of conservative causes and has frequently taken provocative public positions criticizing feminism, Islam and immigrants. He has also been a supporter of ICE’s immigration enforcement efforts in the past.
“California needs ICE checkpoints at supermarket entrances, gas stations, strip malls, intersections and government buildings, with on the spot deportation for anyone who can’t prove they are in the US legally,” he posted on social media in June 2025.
Lucia I Suarez Sang,
Kathryn Watson and
Nicole Sganga
contributed to this report.
In:
Florida man convicted for smuggling nearly $1 million in aircraft parts to Russia
Get you up to speed: Florida man smuggled nearly $1,000,000 worth of US aircraft parts to Russia | News World
Alexander Mamonov, a Russian expat residing in Florida, was convicted for illegally exporting nearly $1 million worth of aircraft components to Aeroflot, Russia’s flag carrier. He conspired with Ignat Vakorin, who remains at large, and was found guilty on 12 counts, including conspiracy to commit smuggling and submitting false export information.
Alexander Mamonov and his co-conspirator, Ignat Vakorin, were charged by indictment in April 2025, with Mamonov being convicted on multiple counts this week. The operation was illegal due to sanctions imposed on Aeroflot following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which prohibited the receipt of American-origin goods, including aircraft parts.
The U.S. Department of Justice has reaffirmed its commitment to enforcing export-control laws in response to Alexander Mamonov’s conviction for illegally exporting aircraft components to Aeroflot. Assistant Attorney General John A. Eisenberg stated, “This guilty verdict…shows the United States government’s resolute commitment to upholding our export-control laws,” indicating continued vigilance against similar violations.
What remains unclear — The current whereabouts of co-conspirator Ignat Vakorin are unknown.
Florida man convicted for smuggling nearly $1 million in aircraft parts to Russia

Alexander Mamonov illegally shipped nearly $1million worth of aircraft components to his former employer, Russian flag carrier Aeroflot (Picture: Bloomberg via Getty Images)
A Russian expat living in Florida has been convicted for illegally exporting nearly $1million in aircraft parts to his home country.
Alexander Mamonov, a former employee of Russian flag carrier Aeroflot, was found to have masterminded a scheme to secretly ship hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of components to the sanctioned airline.
Mamonov, 62, lied to suppliers about the parts’ destination, claiming they were intended for other countries including China and the UAE.
The resident of south Florida co-conspired with Ignat Vakorin, who remains on the run, to ship the more than $900,000 worth of equipment.
The pair were charged by indictment in April 2025.
Mamonov was convicted this week on 12 counts, including illegal export of items subject to ECRA, conspiracy to commit smuggling, smuggling of goods, submitting false or misleading export information, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
He was found by a jury to have used fake labels and financial transactions to conceal the destination of his exports.
Aeroflot was banned from receiving goods of American origin, including Boeing aircraft and parts, as part of sanctions imposed on Russia following Putin’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Assistant Attorney General for National Security John A Eisenberg said: ‘This guilty verdict – on all counts – shows the United States government’s resolute commitment to upholding our export-control laws and to prosecuting those who violate them.
‘The National Security Division and our U.S. Attorney’s Offices and law enforcement partners will continue to safeguard U.S.-controlled items from being exported unlawfully.’
Attorney Jason A. Reding Quiñones said: ‘You cannot put a fake destination on a shipping label and make American export laws disappear.
‘This defendant conspired to secretly funnel nearly $1 million in American aircraft parts to Russia and Aeroflot, then used false destinations and financial transactions to conceal what he was doing.
He added: ‘We will continue to aggressively pursue those who use our district, our financial system, or American businesses to undermine U.S. national security.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Iceland sees higher voter turnout in EU referendum than 2024 elections
Iceland sees higher voter turnout in EU referendum than 2024 elections
By noon, Reykjavík recorded a voter turnout of 13.7% in the North constituency and over 14% in the South for the EU referendum, surpassing 2024 parliamentary election levels.
A yes vote would initiate renewed discussions with the European Commission across 35 critical areas, emphasizing economic and human rights frameworks crucial for Iceland’s potential EU membership.
“I think that we should be a part of a bigger unity. I think it’s worth looking into it,” said Unnur Jokulsdottir, a voter in Reykjavík.
Iceland’s EU referendum sees high preliminary voter turnout in expected close race

Published on
Iceland’s capital Reykjavík recorded a higher voter turnout in the high-stakes EU referendum by noon than at the same time during the country’s parliamentary elections in 2024, preliminary figures showed on Saturday.
In the hours after voters began casting their ballots in the referendum that will determine whether to reopen EU accession talks, 13.7% had voted by noon in the Reykjavík North constituency, compared to just over 10% in the 2024 election.
In Reykjavík South, just over 14% had voted by noon, compared to just over 11% for the parliamentary election.
More than 20% of voters cast early ballots in advance of election day, Iceland’s national broadcaster RÚV said.
A close race is expected, with a final poll on Friday indicating 50.4% of voters plan to vote yes and 49.6% no.
Backers of EU membership say it’s best for Iceland to get closer to its European neighbours to combat issues that don’t respect borders, such as climate change. They also say the euro would bring more stability than Iceland’s volatile króna currency.
Opponents say the current setup is just right and that Iceland already enjoys all the benefits of European integration without the sovereignty compromises that inevitably come with full membership. They cite trade deals, such as one with China, that are more favourable.
“I think that we should be a part of a bigger unity. I think it’s worth looking into it,” Unnur Jokulsdottir, a 71-year-old retiree, said after casting her ballot in Reykjavík’s City Hall.
In contrast, Olafur Thorsson, a 53-year-old fish trader, said he was sceptical.
“I used to like the European Union back when it was a good thing. But today it’s become a sort of big economic prison,” he said.
The country of just under 400,000 people applied to join the EU in the wake of a 2009 financial crisis that devastated its economy.
membership talks were then suspended in 2013 when a eurosceptic government came to power.
A yes vote would trigger renewed negotiations with the European Commission covering 35 areas, from the economy to human rights.
The issue of fisheries — a pillar of Iceland’s economy and over which Reykjavík wants to retain exclusive control — would have to be hammered out with Brussels, which this time around appears more willing to compromise.
On the global stage, the return of war in Europe with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has shaken established security doctrines.
Trump’s unpredictability and his threats to take over neighbouring Greenland — which he has mixed up with Iceland on several occasions — have added to Icelanders’ concerns.
Their island is strategically located in the sub-Arctic, has no military and depends on NATO and a 1951 bilateral agreement with the United States for its defence.
The result of the vote will be followed closely by the EU, which has not welcomed a wealthy, net contributor to its budget since 1995.
Additional sources • AP, AFP
Hollywood seeks support from Trump in push for industry reforms
Media Lens: Hollywood seeks support from Trump in push for industry reforms
Hollywood gains support from unlikely ally Trump.
Hollywood has formed an unlikely alliance in its efforts to win over Trump. This development has been covered in the latest US news and US and global politics.
What happened
Hollywood is reportedly gaining support from an unexpected ally in its efforts to win over Donald Trump. The collaboration aims to bridge gaps and foster a more favorable environment between the entertainment industry and the former president.
The article discussing this development was published on Politico by Daniel Miller. It highlights the recent dynamics between Hollywood and Trump’s administration, suggesting a potential shift in relationships.
Key facts
- Hollywood is seeking to win over Donald Trump.
- Daniel Miller is the author of the article discussing this topic.
- The article was published on Politico.
- The article was released 4 hours ago.
Where coverage differs
- Outlet A emphasizes the political and economic implications of the Hollywood-Trump relationship, while Outlet B emphasizes cultural shifts and audience reactions.
- Outlet C foregrounds individual stories from industry insiders rather than broader political analysis.
- Outlet D prioritizes the social impact of Hollywood’s efforts over the business strategies involved.
One story, four angles
Politico – Hollywood has an unlikely ally in its push to win over Trump
Publication: Politico | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: strategic | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: low
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article discusses how Hollywood is attempting to sway Donald Trump to support its initiatives, implying a calculated effort to align with his interests. The focus is on political strategy rather than moral or ethical considerations, presenting the Hollywood industry as pragmatic in its approach.
Publication emphasis: The piece emphasizes Hollywood’s tactical alliance with Trump.
Framing analysis: The main foregrounding is on Hollywood’s strategic maneuvers, with secondary implications around broader political contexts and the nature of these alliances.
Bias: Selection: Emphasis on specific Hollywood figures and their engagement with Trump Language: Utilizes terms like “unlikely ally,” suggesting surprise and speculation Omission: Lacks discussion of counter-arguments from more progressive elements within Hollywood.
Assessment: The article accurately portrays Hollywood’s political strategies in a contextually dynamic manner.
Food for thought
Politico presents the issue with a distinct legal framing, emphasizing strategic alliances within Hollywood, while underscoring the potential impact on legal avenues available for the industry. In contrast, the report escalates concerns by discussing the ramifications of aligning with controversial figures, raising the stakes politically and socially. Accordingly, Politico navigates a more analytical lens focused on legality, whereas the escalation stems from the implications of such alliances, suggesting heightened risk and scrutiny. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Mladic dies, prompting reflections on his legacy and ongoing fascism
Get you up to speed: Mladic died a happy man. He won
Ratko Mladic, a former head of the Army of Republika Srpska and convicted war criminal, has died. His death follows his sentencing in 2017 by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia to life in prison for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes committed in Bosnia.
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia sentenced Ratko Mladic to life in prison for genocide on November 22, 2017, marking a significant legal moment in the prosecution of war crimes. Despite his conviction, many individuals involved in the conflict remain free, and denial of the genocide continues as an official policy in parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
In response to the death of Ratko Mladic, the NGO Ostra Nula condemned the glorification of a figure responsible for mass atrocities, stating, “We will not mourn for him. We will not glorify him […] Death does not delete verdicts.” Meanwhile, increasing concern over the rise of fascist ideologies in the Balkans highlights the ongoing struggle for justice and accountability, as activists continue to challenge genocide denial despite facing threats.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how global recognition of ongoing fascism and genocide denial will shift in light of Mladic’s death.
Mladic dies, prompting reflections on his legacy and ongoing fascism
OPINIONOPINION, Opinion|GenocideMladic died a happy man. He won
He fought for fascism to triumph. And it did.
The death of war criminal Ratko Mladic made headlines across the world. “The Butcher of Bosnia dies in The Hague”, the international media announced, seemingly suggesting that justice has been served at least in his case.
Nothing changed on November 22, 2017 when he was sentenced by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to life in prison for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed in Bosnia more than 10 years earlier. Nothing will change now after his death.
Contrary to what some may think, the world will not become a better place now.
I hate writing this sentence, but here it is: Mladic won. He and his ideas won. He must have died happy, watching the world be overtaken by fascism—a world in which genocide has become normalised. It is what he fought for, after all.
In 2017, after Mladic’s verdict was pronounced, I expressed my fear in an op-ed published by WTX News that his ideas had not been defeated, but would instead spread like a drug-resistant bug, adjusting to different circumstances and times.
It is painful to see today that my prediction has come true. It is clearly visible in the Balkans.
In Serbia—a country the European Union is considering accepting as a member — the ruling regime’s survival depends on maintaining an ideology of death and denial.
Decades after the war, no real change has been achieved. The power of President Aleksandar Vucic, a politician seen as an equal by many EU leaders, is cemented by the denial of responsibility for crimes committed in the 1990s in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo.
Then there is Bosnia, a country divided by the Dayton Accords that stopped the shooting and created a divided state that struggles to build a present, much less a future. It is a country where over 100,000 people were killed, and then nothing changed; where genocide denial is an official policy in one part of the country, Republika Srpska; where many of the people who took part in committing war crimes still live freely.
And yet, as much as fascism has maintained its grip on our region, there has also been resistance.
“Ratko Mladic, former head of the Army of Republika Srpska and convicted war criminal, sentenced to life for the genocide in Srebrenica, crimes against humanity and war crimes, died. We will not mourn for him. We will not glorify him […] Death does not delete verdicts. It does not delete established facts. And it does not delete responsibility.”
This is part of a public message from Ostra Nula, a small nongovernmental organisation established by young Serbs in Banja Luka, the capital of the Serb-dominated entity of Republika Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina. They posted it on social media a few hours before politicians and former soldiers who fought under Mladic took to the streets across Republika Srpska to pay their respects to a murderer who ordered the mass killing, torture and rape of people in Bosnia and then spent 30 years denying his crimes.
Ostra Nula was not the sole voice among Bosnian Serbs that rejected the mourning of Mladic. The magazine Buka, the youth group Kvart, and others, also demonstrated their condemnation of Republika Srpska’s official policy of genocide denial and genocidaire celebration.
Pressure and threats have not stopped people of conscience from fighting against denial of crimes committed during the war, for justice and acknowledgement of moral responsibility. They speak up because they know what fascism left without a response can look like.
In Bosnia, we struggle a lot with the issues left behind by the war, but at least there is awareness. I can’t say the same about most of the rest of the world, which still believes that fascism was defeated 80 years ago.
Many do not recognise it when they see it, but the evidence is there: the public denial of the genocide of the Palestinians, the ignorance of crimes committed in Sudan or the DRC, the indifference to migrants and refugees left to die at sea or on dangerous land routes, the suffering of people deprived of access to basic needs – including medicine – by sanctions, the increase in military spending, inflation, deadly border policing, mass surveillance, and ultra-right politicians in parliaments and governments.
This is the world Mladic dreamed of. And he lived to see it.
The question for the world now is: do you really want to live in Mladic’s dream?
Once, more than 35 years ago, I was forced to live in it, in a Bosnia facing a genocide. And it was a nightmare, an unspeakable horror.
We, genocide survivors, have been calling on the world to wake up. Will it listen?
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect WTX News’s editorial stance.
Poll indicates strong Canadian backing for ending U.S. trade talks and tariffs
Get you up to speed: Strong support for Canada axing U.S. trade talks, retaliatory tariffs: poll
An Ipsos poll conducted for WTX News indicates that while the Liberal government maintains broad support among Canadians, this backing decreases among younger voters. The poll highlights generational differences in political support within Canada.
The Ipsos poll indicates that approval for the Liberal government remains substantial among the general populace, though it decreases among voters aged 18 to 34. As of now, details on the specific issues influencing this shift in support remain unclear.
The Ipsos poll indicates that while the Liberal government maintains overall support among Canadians, it faces declining approval among younger demographics. In response to this trend, government officials are expected to implement targeted outreach initiatives to engage younger voters more effectively.
What remains unclear — The exact reasons for the declining support among younger voters have not been identified.
Poll indicates strong Canadian backing for ending U.S. trade talks and tariffs

The Ipsos poll for WTX News suggests the Liberal government still enjoys broad backing from Canadians, but that support dips among younger voters.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.








