- House Speaker Mike Johnson opposes livestreamed execution by Hegseth
- Nobel Prize winner claims Russian medics are torturing Ukrainian prisoners
- Spain’s National Day parade features military display amid political tension
- Federal agents raid home of Representative Ilhan Omar, warrant approved
- Houthi Attacks Cause Closure of Saudi Airport Amid US Consideration of Strikes
- NATO warns it will take all measures if alliance is attacked
- Motorcyclist dies in collision with SUV in Ottawa
- Homeland Security investigates Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home in Washington, D.C.
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
House Speaker Mike Johnson opposes livestreamed execution by Hegseth
Get you up to speed: House Speaker Mike Johnson voices opposition to livestreamed execution planned by Hegseth
House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed opposition to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s proposal to live stream the execution of the Fort Hood shooter during an interview with WTX US News chief Washington analyst Robert Costa. Johnson’s stance aligns with that of other prominent Republicans.
House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed his opposition to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s proposal to live stream the execution of the Fort Hood shooter. This stance aligns with views held by several key Republican figures in the ongoing discussion surrounding the execution’s transparency.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, along with other prominent Republicans, has expressed opposition to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s proposal to live stream the execution of the Fort Hood shooter. Johnson’s stance indicates a broader Republican dissent, as discussions continue on the appropriate handling of high-profile executions.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether any alternative methods of execution are being considered by the officials.
House Speaker Mike Johnson opposes livestreamed execution by Hegseth
House Speaker Mike Johnson was asked by WTX US News chief Washington analyst Robert Costa about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s plan to live stream the firing squad execution of the Fort Hood shooter. Speaker Johnson, joining with other prominent Republicans, is against that idea.
Nobel Prize winner claims Russian medics are torturing Ukrainian prisoners
Get you up to speed: Nobel Prize winner says Russia medics are torturing Ukrainian prisoners | News World
Oleksandra Matviichuk, leader of the Center for Civil Liberties, highlighted allegations that Russian medics are involved in the torture of Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war. She stated that such incidents are systemic and have been recorded over 12 years of conflict, with reports including severe abuses like branding victims during treatment.
The Center for Civil Liberties has submitted multiple requests to the International Criminal Court in The Hague to investigate the alleged torture by Russian medics, with particular emphasis on the documented actions of Ilya Sorokin, known as ‘Doctor Evil’. Matviichuk indicated a need for immediate access for the International Committee of the Red Cross to all detained civilians and prisoners of war, emphasizing that such access is vital for ensuring humanitarian standards are upheld.
Oleksandra Matviichuk, representing the Center for Civil Liberties, has called for urgent intervention from international bodies following allegations that Russian medics have tortured Ukrainian detainees. In response to these claims, the Centre, along with other NGOs, has submitted an appeal to the World Health Organisation, emphasising the need for oversight and access to affected individuals in order to uphold international medical ethics.
What remains unclear — It is not known how the International Criminal Court will respond to the submissions regarding alleged crimes against humanity by Russian medics.
Nobel Prize winner claims Russian medics are torturing Ukrainian prisoners

Oleksandra Matviichuk, delivering her Nobel lecture in 2022 (Picture: EPA)
A winner of the Nobel Peace Prize has called for immediate action after a report claimed Russia is weaponising doctors and medics to torture Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war.
Oleksandra Matviichuk leads the Center for Civil Liberties, the human rights organisation which received the prize in 2022 alongside Russian non-profit Memorial and Belarusian campaigner Ales Bialiatski.
The centre is among a group of Ukrainian charities and institutions sounding the alarm over allegations of international law and medical ethics by Russia.
Medics are alleged to have denied badly needed care, tortured prisoners with tasers – and even branded patients with pro-Russia messages.
Matviichuk told WTX: ‘We want to share this information to put pressure on Russia in order to save lives, because people are dying. People are dying.
‘Their conditions are inhuman and the treatment is beyond human imagination.’
Sign up for all of the latest stories
She highlighted the case of a man who told her he saw medics only once while incarcerated, after he lost consciousness while being tortured.
Matviichuk, a human rights lawyer, said: ‘The Russian medics were invited to give an injection and to return him to consciousness, to provide the opportunity to continue the torture process.’
In another case, she spoke of a Ukrainian soldier who woke from an operation to find the words ‘Glory to Russia’ had been written in scars on his skin with a surgical tool.
She said: ‘Now this person, after returning to Ukraine as a result of prisoner exchange, is going through the process of removing this slogan from his body.
‘It’s a very painful and long-lasting process.’

Ukrainian military personnel returning home in March after time in Russian prison (Picture: Artem Gvozdkov/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)
Such incidents are systemic rather than isolated, she said, pointing to testimonies collected over 12 years since the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014.
Matviichuk explained: ‘We interviewed people who returned from the prisons, but we also interviewed people who get information from people who are close to them – their relatives, their families, who are still under occupation.
‘And Russians are very brutal. They are not even hiding their crimes.’
The report, titled Anatomy of Torture, was written by four experts based at the Center for Civil Liberties and supported by the UK Government.
Testimonies include several describing an individual based in the Russian Republic of Mordovia dubbed ‘Doctor Evil’.
One person quoted in the report described a visit from the doctor: ‘The cell opens, and he hits the person addressing him and the person on duty in the cell.
‘And he would start talking like this: “Patient, what’s wrong with you? Patient, come here, give me your hand.”
‘Your eyes are closed, your head is tilted down, and you can’t see anything. You give him your hand, and he hits you in the hand with a taser. First, he hits you with a taser, and then he gives you a pill.’
Another person said the so-called Doctor Evil participated in torture and ‘ensured the person stayed alive’.

From left, wife of Ales Bialiatski Natalia Pinchuk; Memorial chairman Yan Rachinsky, and Matviichuk with their certificates (Picture: Javad Parsa/NTB/AFP via Getty Images)
The doctor in question was identified as Ilya Sorokin by Ukrainian human rights group KHPG.
He was charged in absentia by the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) in December last year, but Matviichuk said there is ‘no possibility to physically arrest him because he is in Russia’.
The lawyer said ‘several submissions’ had been sent to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, and she called on the body to ‘open the case based on these crimes against humanity’.
She added: ‘What must be done is provide the full access of International Committee of Red Cross to all illegally detained civilians and prisoners of the war, and to create a special medics commission to be sent to Russia to work to get access to people.’
Matviichuk also urged professional medics in other countries to react to the practice, arguing such a mobilisation can have a ‘chilling effect’ on Russian behaviour as some exchanges and cooperation still exist.
Last week, the Center for Civil Liberties led an open appeal to the World Health Organisation alongside a number of other NGOs, institutions and groups, calling for an intervention.
The letter says the WHO has ‘unique expertise and international capacity to draw attention to violations of the right to health, uphold international standards of medical care, and help ensure that the principles of healthcare and medical ethics remain in force even in situations of armed conflict’.
When approached by WTX, the WHO declined to comment.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Spain’s National Day parade features military display amid political tension
Spain’s National Day parade features military display amid political tension
The parade featured 82 aircraft in an aerial display, led by two F/A-18 jets, and showcased the army’s 8×8 Dragón armoured vehicles for the first time.
Spain’s Defence Ministry showcased advanced military capabilities, including new armoured vehicles and anti-drone systems, indicating a strategic shift in defence investment priorities.
“King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia will travel to Ceuta on Tuesday, reflecting the government’s ongoing commitment to addressing recent challenges in the region.”
Ceuta troops absent as Spain holds National Day parade in Madrid

Ceuta made its presence felt at Spain’s National Day parade without a single one of its soldiers setting foot on Madrid’s Paseo del Prado.
No troops from the autonomous city took part this year, as the Spanish Ministry of Defence has kept its forces deployed there following the crisis that erupted in July, when tens of thousands of migrants crossed into the territory from Morocco.
King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia, who presided over the ceremony in Madrid, will travel to Ceuta on Tuesday.
The parade took place against a tense political backdrop, after Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez called an early general election for 29 November.
Sánchez arrived at the parade with parliament dissolved and was met with jeers from people gathered in the streets.
Under clear skies, 82 aircraft took part in an aerial display as part of the day’s events, led by two F/A-18 jets.
On the ground, the army’s 8×8 Dragón armoured vehicles took centre stage for the first time. Marine Corps vehicles equipped with the Aracne anti-drone system also made their debut, along with two Asturcón drones from the Military Emergencies Unit – a clear sign of where the Spanish Defence Ministry is looking to invest.
A total of 3,850 men and 530 women took part in the parade.
The King and Queen then hosted a reception at the Royal Palace to mark the end of the National Day celebrations.
Federal agents raid home of Representative Ilhan Omar, warrant approved
Media Lens: Federal agents raid home of Representative Ilhan Omar, warrant approved
Federal agents search home of Representative Ilhan Omar.
Federal agents have searched the home of Representative Ilhan Omar in a pre-dawn raid. This operation was approved by the Department of Justice, as reported in coverage in NPR and The Hill.
What happened
Federal agents conducted a search at the home of Representative Ilhan Omar. This action was approved by the Department of Justice.
The raid, perceived as a significant event, has drawn responses from various political figures, including former President Donald Trump, who commented on Omar’s character following the operation.
Key facts
- Federal agents conducted a search of Representative Ilhan Omar’s home.
- The search was reportedly approved by the Department of Justice.
- The raid took place during the early morning hours.
- Ilhan Omar is a Democratic congresswoman and has been a subject of criticism from former President Trump.
Where coverage differs
- Reuters emphasizes the search warrant approved by the Department of Justice, while Fox News highlights the timing of the raid as a “pre-dawn” action.
- NPR foregrounds the Federal agents involved in the search rather than the political implications, while The Hill focuses on Donald Trump’s comments regarding Ilhan Omar.
- Fox News prioritizes the portrayal of Ilhan Omar as a “Democratic Trump critic,” while Reuters provides a more neutral description of her as a representative.
One story, four angles
Reuters – US immigration authorities raid home of Democratic Trump critic Ilhan Omar
Publication: Reuters | Primary framing pattern: legal | Tone: factual | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article reports on the federal agents’ search of Ilhan Omar’s home, supported by a statement from the Department of Justice confirming the approval of the warrant. Emphasis is placed on the legal aspect and procedural correctness of the raid.
Publication emphasis: Focus on the legal details surrounding the search warrant execution.
Framing analysis: The report foregrounds legal authorization and the context of the raid, while secondary details include the political implications of the event.
Bias: Selection: Focus on legal procedures; Language: Neutral wording; Omission: Limited political context.
Assessment: The piece remains largely factual, emphasizing legal protocols over political drama.
Fox News – Immigration enforcement officials search Ilhan Omar’s home in pre-dawn raid
Publication: Fox News | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: critical | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article highlights the controversial nature of the FBI’s search at the home of Ilhan Omar, emphasizing her status as a vocal Trump critic. The framing suggests targeted political prosecution and raises questions of bias within the enforcement process.
Publication emphasis: Focus on Omar’s political identity and the implications of the raid as politically motivated.
Framing analysis: This outlet foregrounds the political implications and Omar’s criticisms of Trump, while legal procedures are given secondary priority.
Bias: Selection: Emphasis on Omar’s political alignment; Language: Charged vocabulary; Omission: Less focus on the specific legal grounds of the search.
Assessment: The article employs a more accusatory tone, creating a narrative of political persecution.
NPR – Federal agents search Rep. Ilhan Omar’s DC home, DOJ says it approved the warrant
Publication: NPR | Primary framing pattern: legal | Tone: informative | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: This report discusses the search warrant executed at Ilhan Omar’s residence, referencing DOJ approval. It provides high legal accuracy but also touches on political backlash, presenting the event as a significant moment in the context of law enforcement and politics.
Publication emphasis: Stresses the legal verification and DOJ’s involvement while updating on potential implications for Omar.
Framing analysis: The legal aspects are highlighted prominently, with political repercussions also introduced as a secondary concern.
Bias: Selection: Balanced coverage of legal and political contexts; Language: Scholarly tone; Omission: No major omissions noted.
Assessment: This piece offers a detailed, neutral perspective focused on legal legitimacy and implications.
The Hill – Trump calls Omar ‘totally crooked’ in first remarks on raid
Publication: The Hill | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: accusatory | Intensity: 9/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article features former President Trump’s response to the raid, describing Omar as “totally crooked.” It situates the event as part of a broader narrative of political antagonism and charges of corruption against Omar, amplifying the political stakes of the situation.
Publication emphasis: Emphasizes Trump’s critiques and the implied corruption narrative surrounding Omar.
Framing analysis: The focus is primarily on the political implications and Trump’s remarks, with legal details receiving less focus.
Bias: Selection: Choice of Trump’s comments as the key narrative; Language: Highly charged and emotive; Omission: Less discussion of the legal legitimacy of the raid.
Assessment: The piece showcases a highly partisan angle, amplifying political rhetoric against Omar.
Food for thought
NPR delivers the strongest legal framing regarding the raid on Ilhan Omar’s home, noting that the Department of Justice sanctioned the search warrant, which emphasizes the legality of the operation. In contrast, Fox News adopts a more escalatory perspective, labeling the incident as a “pre-dawn raid” and framing Omar as a “Democratic Trump critic,” heightening the drama of the situation. While Reuters maintains a neutral stance by reporting the facts, it refrains from emphasizing legalities or emotional rhetoric. This juxtaposition highlights how the same incident can be perceived through distinct lenses based on the outlet’s framing choices. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Houthi Attacks Cause Closure of Saudi Airport Amid US Consideration of Strikes
Media Lens: Houthi Attacks Cause Closure of Saudi Airport Amid US Consideration of Strikes
Story focus: Houthi attacks close Saudi airport, Trump considers strikes.
Primary entity: Not specified | Region:
The main geographic focus of the content is Saudi Arabia.
The Houthi rebels carried out deadly strikes on Saudi Arabia, leading to the closure of an airport. These attacks prompted President Trump to consider military action in Yemen.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
The recent escalation of hostilities between Iran-backed Houthi militants and Saudi Arabia has resulted in multiple attacks on Saudi airports, significantly impacting operations. Following the latest assaults, the Riyadh airport was closed, prompting investigations into the effectiveness of Saudi defense systems during the attacks that occurred over the weekend.
In addition to the ongoing conflict, U.S. President Trump has been contemplating potential military responses, adding to the tense atmosphere in the region. Reports indicate that the situation continues to evolve, with the potential for further international involvement as the crisis unfolds.
Status quo
No background paragraph is needed as the content provided does not require additional context for understanding.
Confirmed facts
- Houthi attacks have targeted Saudi Arabia’s airport, leading to closures.
- U.S. President Trump is considering strikes in response to the situation in Yemen.
- Investigations are ongoing regarding the effectiveness of Saudi defense systems against Houthi attacks.
- Iran-backed militants are increasing pressure on Saudi Arabia.
Preconceptions
- CBS News prioritizes the immediate consequences of Houthi attacks on Saudi infrastructure, focusing on the operational disruptions caused, while the WSJ emphasizes the strategic implications for Saudi leadership in response to the attacks.
- The New York Times stresses the broader context of escalating tensions and potential U.S. military involvement, contrasting with AP News, which highlights the technical failures of Saudi defense systems in their coverage of a specific recent incident.
- WSJ concentrates more on the geopolitical ramifications and power dynamics surrounding Saudi Arabia, whereas CBS News presents a more localized and human-centric account of the impact on civilian life and safety.
Elisions
- The coverage from CBS News highlights the perspective of U.S. considerations regarding military strikes following Houthi attacks, while WSJ focuses more on the implications for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman without U.S. involvement discussions.
- AP News delivers insights into the deficiencies of Saudi defense systems in stopping the Houthi attacks, whereas The New York Times emphasizes the broader consequences of these attacks on Saudi Arabia’s stability, missing a focus on defense mechanisms.
- CBS News provides timely updates on the Houthi attacks causing airport closures but lacks analysis on regional diplomatic repercussions, a gap filled by WSJ’s discussion of the political fallout for Saudi leadership.
One story, four angles
CBS News – Iran War Updates: Deadly Houthi attacks keep Saudi airport closed as Trump considers U.S. strikes in Yemen
Publication: CBS News | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The piece foregrounds the Houthi attacks and their impact on Saudi Arabia, compelling readers to consider the broader geopolitical implications involving the U.S.
Key differences:
1. Compared to WSJ, CBS uses emotive language like “deadly” in the headline, focusing on the human cost rather than policies.
2. CBS emphasizes Trump’s potential response, stating he “considers” strikes, indicative of U.S. involvement, a detail less emphasized by the New York Times.
3. The placement of the Houthi attacks early in the story suggests a more immediate threat compared to AP, which highlights defense system failures.
Bias: Selection: Focuses on the urgency of military responses | Language: Uses charged terms like “deadly” | Omission: Lacks detailed context on Saudi defense strategies.
Assessment: Readers are led to perceive a pressing military threat influenced by external powers.
WSJ – Iran-Backed Militants Are Tightening the Screws on Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince
Publication: WSJ | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article puts Saudi Arabia’s leadership under scrutiny, hinting at a direct challenge from Iran, thus framing a more strategic narrative.
Key differences:
1. In contrast to CBS, WSJ explores the implications for Saudi leadership, framing the threat as a direct challenge, subtly shifting focus from military action.
2. Words like “tightening the screws” imply a sense of control by Iran, while CBS focuses more on immediate incidents, providing a tactical perspective more than strategic.
3. The WSJ’s headline casts Saudi Arabia’s internal dynamics amid external pressures, whereas AP presents a more action-oriented narrative regarding the immediate crisis.
Bias: Selection: Highlights power dynamics over immediate violence | Language: Suggests a calculated maneuver rather than spontaneous conflict | Omission: Less emphasis on civilian impacts compared to CBS.
Assessment: Readers perceive a nuanced threat to Saudi authority rather than immediate violence.
AP News – Saudis probe how defense systems failed to stop deadly Houthi attack on Riyadh airport
Publication: AP News | Intensity: (5/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The focus on the failure of defense systems directs readers’ attention towards strategic military vulnerabilities rather than immediate conflict outcomes.
Key differences:
1. AP analyzes why Saudi defenses failed, contrasting with CBS’s focus on the attacks’ immediate implications, highlighting military preparedness over direct threats.
2. The phrase “defense systems failed” points to accountability, inviting critical analysis on Saudi military strategies, which is less prominent in CBS’s narrative.
3. While WSJ examines leadership implications, AP addresses operational deficiencies, providing a tactical viewpoint missing in CBS’s account.
Bias: Selection: Focus on military preparedness over civilian impacts | Language: Utilizes technical language emphasizing failure | Omission: Lacks emotional responses or human-based narratives found in CBS.
Assessment: Readers recognize underlying military vulnerabilities rather than immediate threats.
The New York Times – Saudi Arabia Faces More Attacks as It Reels From Airport Strikes
Publication: The New York Times | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The opening highlights ongoing threats to Saudi Arabia, directing reader focus towards the security challenges facing the state.
Key differences:
1. Unlike CBS, which emphasizes Trump’s possible response, NYT focuses on the structural instabilities within Saudi Arabia, enhancing the narrative of insecurity.
2. The phrase “faces more attacks” implies a continuum of threats, creating a sense of vulnerability in contrast to WSJ’s strategic framing.
3. The NYT’s focus on “reels from airport strikes” invokes a more visceral emotional response contrasting with AP’s analytical tone.
Bias: Selection: Prioritizes narrative of ongoing security issues | Language: Uses evocative language inducing emotional response | Omission: Lacks in-depth analysis of military effectiveness seen in AP.
Assessment: Readers perceive a state in turmoil, facing persistent threats rather than analyzing responses critically.
CBS News frames the situation with urgency, highlighting potential U.S. military action in response to Houthi attacks, creating a sense of imminent escalation. In contrast, the Wall Street Journal emphasizes the political maneuvering of Iran-backed militants tightening their grip on Saudi Arabia, suggesting a more calculated tension. The New York Times presents a sober assessment of Saudi Arabia’s vulnerabilities to attacks, while AP News focuses on the failure of defense systems. Ultimately, CBS News’s framing is the most escalatory, while the others adopt a more analytical stance. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
CBS News
WSJ
Iran-Backed Militants Are Tightening the Screws on Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince
The New York Times
Saudi Arabia Faces More Attacks as It Reels From Airport Strikes
AP News
Saudis probe how defense systems failed to stop deadly Houthi attack on Riyadh airport
NATO warns it will take all measures if alliance is attacked
Get you up to speed: NATO says will do ‘anything and everything’ if alliance is attacked
NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, US Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, issued a warning during the Warsaw Security Forum, stating that NATO forces would destroy “anything and everything” if attacked. The remarks come amid rising European concerns over potential Russian attacks related to the ongoing war in Ukraine.
NATO’s current 10-year strategy, established in 2022, identifies Russia as its most significant security threat, reflecting ongoing European concerns over potential military aggression. The alliance’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, General Alexus Grynkewich, asserted that NATO is prepared to respond decisively to any attack, emphasising the importance of deterrence and readiness to assure member states.
NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, General Alexus Grynkewich, asserted at the Warsaw Security Forum that the alliance would take decisive action against any attack, stating, “We will ensure any attack, against any ally, proves utterly futile.” In light of rising tensions, Grynkewich emphasised the importance of maintaining open communication to prevent misunderstandings while reaffirming NATO’s defensive posture and its readiness to respond to threats from Russia.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how NATO will specifically respond to any potential escalation following a Russian attack amidst ongoing tensions in Europe.
NATO warns it will take all measures if alliance is attacked
News|NATONATO says will do ‘anything and everything’ if alliance is attacked
NATO commander issues warning as European officials suggest potential Russian attacks.
Published On 12 Oct 202612 Oct 2026
NATO’s top commander has warned that his forces would destroy “anything and everything” if someone was “foolish enough” to attack the alliance, as European concerns have mounted over a potential Russian attack on its territory amid the war in Ukraine.
“We will block the initial attack. If the attack persists, we will blunt it and prevent any enemy advance. And if required, we will break the enemy’s forces and the operational war-fighting system arrayed against us,” US Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich told the Warsaw Security Forum on Monday, without mentioning Russia by name.
Grynkewich stressed that NATO is a defensive alliance and that he does not believe that a conflict is imminent or inevitable. The most effective way to preserve peace is to prepare for war and to maintain open lines of communication to “resolve misunderstandings”, he added.
European governments have accused Moscow of stepping up a campaign of sabotage, drone incursions and cyberattacks against them, while Russia warned last month it could use nuclear weapons if NATO attempted to cut off its Baltic Kaliningrad exclave where it has a major military outpost.
NATO’s 10-year strategy, created in 2022, described Russia as the alliance’s most significant security threat.
“We will, in short, ensure any attack, against any ally, proves utterly futile,” Grynkewich said.
US General Alexus Grynkewich, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, speaks during the opening session of the Warsaw Security Forum in Warsaw, Poland on October 12, 2026 [Wojtek Radwanski/AFP]
Attacking anything that ‘supports, sustains and controls that force’
Grynkewich added that NATO’s response would not be limited to forces involved in an initial attack.
“Should the adversary choose to press the attack or commit his reserves, we will break the warfighting system engaged against us,” he said.
“This includes not just the attacking force itself, but anything and everything that supports, sustains and controls that force.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin said this month that Russia had no plans to attack any European country and wanted to coexist peacefully. Such declarations have not reassured European leaders, who cite similar statements by Russia before its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Moscow has also repeatedly denied involvement in sabotage and other hybrid operations.
Latvian, German, Spain, Canadian and NATO flags at Lielvarde Air Base, Latvia [File:Toms Kalnins/EPA]
‘We’ve got this’
Grynkewich said he had decided to talk publicly about NATO’s plans because recent acts of sabotage and arson had made people around the alliance nervous.
“What I want to do is assure the one billion citizens of our alliance that we’ve got this. We know what we need to do. We know how we would do it,” he said.
Grynkewich sought to downplay concerns about Washington’s commitment to the alliance, citing President Donald Trump’s reception at a NATO summit in Ankara in July.
“I was in the room and I felt the love,” he said.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.









