LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Donald Trump appoints Stephen Miller as new White House chief of staff

Media Lens: Donald Trump appoints Stephen Miller as new White House chief of staff


Donald Trump names Stephen Miller as chief of staff.

Donald Trump has named Stephen Miller as the White House chief of staff. This promotion has sparked anger among industries affected by immigration enforcement, according to coverage in The Washington Post and CNN.


What happened

Donald Trump has appointed Stephen Miller as the new White House chief of staff. This decision has sparked anger among industries that are currently impacted by immigration enforcement policies.

The appointment is described as aligning with Trump’s controversial approaches and has raised concerns about potential future conflict regarding immigration issues. Observers anticipate that Miller’s influence in the administration will intensify the ongoing debates surrounding immigration reform.

Key facts

  • Donald Trump has named Stephen Miller as White House chief of staff.
  • The announcement was reported by multiple news outlets including The Washington Post, BBC, CNN, and The Wall Street Journal.
  • Stephen Miller is known for his strong stance on immigration enforcement.
  • The appointment has sparked criticism and concern among various industries affected by immigration policies.

Where coverage differs

  • The Washington Post emphasizes the backlash from industries affected by immigration policy, while BBC emphasizes the potential challenges ahead for Trump with his new chief of staff.
  • WSJ foregrounds the implications for big business following Miller’s appointment rather than focusing on Miller’s past role in immigration policy.
  • CNN prioritizes Donald Trump’s unpredictable leadership style in relation to his new chief of staff over the specific policies Miller may enforce.

One story, four angles


The Washington Post – Stephen Miller’s promotion angers industries reeling from immigration enforcement

Publication: The Washington Post | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: critical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: The article focuses on the backlash from various industries following Stephen Miller’s appointment, highlighting concerns regarding stringent immigration policies that could adversely impact businesses reliant on immigrant labor. It underscores the potential negative consequences for economic sectors that employ immigrants, framing the discussion around economic stability and labor needs.

Publication emphasis: Highlighting the frustration of industries affected by immigration policy changes.

Framing analysis: The article foregrounds industry concerns and potential economic repercussions while secondary issues include Miller’s controversial history and policy positions.

Bias: Selection: Focus on industries’ opposition. Language: Terms like “angers” signal strong discontent. Omission: Lacks positive perspectives on Miller’s policies.

Assessment: The report presents a critical view of Miller’s promotion, emphasizing the potential fallout for industries struggling with immigration enforcement.


BBC – With Stephen Miller pick, Trump readies for a battle

Publication: BBC | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: assertive | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: mixed | Legal precision: medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: This piece discusses the implications of Trump’s selection of Stephen Miller, indicating that it signals an expected intensification of his hardline policies on immigration. It outlines how this appointment may provoke conflict with various stakeholders, including businesses and lawmakers who oppose stricter immigration measures.

Publication emphasis: Anticipating confrontations between the Trump administration and opposing forces.

Framing analysis: The article foregrounds the political ramifications of Miller’s appointment while secondary aspects include public response and business concerns.

Bias: Selection: Focuses on political conflicts. Language: Uses terms like “readies for a battle,” indicating high stakes and tension. Omission: Little analysis on potential support for Miller’s policies.

Assessment: The article forecasts an escalation in political tensions surrounding immigration policy following Miller’s appointment.


CNN – Trump goes full Trump with his new chief of staff pick

Publication: CNN | Primary framing pattern: moral | Tone: incredulous | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: The article critiques Trump’s decision to appoint Miller as chief of staff, expressing disbelief at the choice and suggesting it reflects Trump’s unwavering commitment to controversial, divisive policies. It underscores the moral implications of selecting a polarizing figure associated with severe immigration policies, hinting at the broader societal impact.

Publication emphasis: Highlighting the questionable moral character of Miller and the administration’s choices.

Framing analysis: This piece foregrounds the moral implications of Miller’s appointment while secondary considerations include political strategy and public reactions.

Bias: Selection: Focus on moral judgments of Miller. Language: Phrases like “goes full Trump” imply a consistent trend of contentious leadership. Omission: Fewer insights into policy details or implications for governance.

Assessment: The report conveys strong moral criticism of Miller’s appointment, framing it as indicative of Trump’s broader controversial approach.


WSJ – With Susie Wiles’s Departure, Big Business Loses a Sympathetic Ear

Publication: WSJ | Primary framing pattern: policy | Tone: analytical | Intensity: 5/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: The article evaluates the implications of Susie Wiles’s departure for big businesses that strategically collaborated with the Trump administration. It notes how her exit could signal shifts in policy discussions that may affect immigration reform and related business concerns, highlighting the intersection of politics and commerce.

Publication emphasis: Understanding the impact of personnel changes on business interests.

Framing analysis: This article foregrounds the policy implications stemming from staffing changes while secondary aspects include industry responses and individual career trajectories.

Bias: Selection: Focus on business reactions to personnel changes. Language: Use of terms like “loses a sympathetic ear” suggests a nuanced understanding of administrative dynamics. Omission: Limited exploration of broader immigration issues outside of personnel shifts.

Assessment: The report offers a measured analysis of the effects of Wiles’s departure, focusing on the implications for business advocacy in relation to immigration policy.


Food for thought

The Washington Post offers the strongest legal framing by emphasizing how Stephen Miller’s promotion “angers industries reeling from immigration enforcement,” clearly linking potential repercussions to his policies. In contrast, CNN adopts the most escalatory approach, stating, “Trump goes full Trump with his new chief of staff pick,” insinuating a complete embrace of controversial tactics that could deepen divisions. Both outlets highlight significant concerns but from distinct perspectives—legal repercussions versus a combative style. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.

EU foreign policy chief asserts Ukraine’s vital role in Europe’s security architecture.

EU foreign policy chief asserts Ukraine’s vital role in Europe’s security architecture.

The European Union has reiterated its stance on Ukraine’s integration into the continent’s security framework, with EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell stating that Ukraine must be included in Europe’s long-term security architecture. This declaration comes amidst ongoing tensions in Eastern Europe and a backdrop of increasing military support for Ukraine as it continues to combat Russian aggressions. The EU’s commitment is likely to be discussed further at the upcoming European Council meeting on November 10, where leaders will review the situation and reaffirm their support for Ukraine.

In the economic sphere, the EU is preparing to counter potential disruptions to trade relationships as it announced a one-year delay for new methane regulations, following consultations with member states amid the escalating conflict in the region. Analysts suggest that delays in environmental regulations could have implications for the EU’s broader climate objectives. As negotiations progress, stakeholders will be looking closely at the outcomes of the next European Council meeting to assess potential shifts in trade and environmental policies.

Key developments across Europe

EU rejects Trump’s ‘big beautiful’ security deal with Russia and ‘all of Europe’

EU DEFENCE — The EU has dismissed a proposed security deal from former President Trump with repercussions for transatlantic relations.

EU officials have indicated that the deal would undermine collective European security frameworks. Trump’s proposal, described as favouring US interests, was met with widespread scepticism from European leaders, marking a significant divergence in strategic security approaches on both sides of the Atlantic.

Bomb Threats in Europe Probably a Coordinated Campaign, Ireland Says

EU SECURITY — Irish authorities suspect that recent bomb threats across Europe are part of a coordinated campaign.

The Irish government has warned that these threats, received by various institutions, suggest a deliberate strategy to instil fear and disrupt public order across multiple countries. Investigations are underway to determine the origins and motivations behind these threats, which have raised significant security concerns across the region.

‘I don’t know if it reassured or worried them’: European envoys quiz Le Pen over lunch

EU POLITICS — European envoys held discussions with Marine Le Pen, gauging her potential role in a future European political landscape.

The meeting highlighted concerns regarding her party’s alignment with broader European values and policies, as ambassadors sought clarity on her vision for France’s role in the EU. This dialogue underscores the ongoing debate within Europe about the rise of populist movements and their implications for EU cohesion.

Ukraine must be part of Europe’s security architecture, EU foreign policy chief says

EU FOREIGN POLICY — The EU’s foreign policy chief has asserted that Ukraine should be integrated into Europe’s security architecture.

This statement was made in recognition of the critical security challenges posed by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The EU aims to enhance its strategic alignment and collective defence strategies, indicating a commitment to reinforcing Ukraine’s position within European security frameworks amidst rising geopolitical tensions.

What to watch — Continued developments on the security implications for Europe stemming from Ukraine’s potential integration into the EU structure will be closely monitored.

Further reading from across European news sources

Euronews
EU rejects Trump’s ‘big beautiful’ security deal with Russia and ‘all of Europe’

Reuters
Ukraine must be part of Europe’s security architecture, EU foreign policy chief says

Financial Times
The UK has few easy options for rejoining a ‘traumatised’ EU

Politico.eu
EU quietly braces for nightmare scenario of multiple-casualty hybrid attack

The Guardian
Home Office sued after stripping almost 1,500 EU citizens of right to live in UK

US imposes new sanctions on Iran amid ongoing nuclear tensions.

US imposes new sanctions on Iran amid ongoing nuclear tensions.

Tensions are escalating in Eastern Europe as NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced a significant increase in military readiness in response to ongoing hostilities in the region. This move comes amid heightened concerns over Russia’s military activities near Ukraine, where a large Russian troop presence continues to provoke fears of further conflict. Additionally, the European Union is set to convene later this week to discuss enhanced sanctions against Moscow, signalling a united front in addressing perceived threats to European stability.

In the economic sphere, uncertainty looms over global energy markets as nations prepare for winter. Analysts are closely monitoring potential disruptions in natural gas supplies due to the geopolitical climate. As governments strategise for energy security, attention now turns to the upcoming G20 summit, where leaders will likely address the implications of these tensions on global trade and energy resources.

Key developments across the world

Trump Readies for a Battle Following Appointment of Stephen Miller

WORLD POLITICS — Donald Trump has appointed Stephen Miller as his new chief of staff amid expectations of significant confrontations in the coming political climate.

Miller, known for orchestrating Trump’s controversial immigration policies, is expected to bring a hardline approach as Trump gears up for a 2024 election bid. Analysts suggest that this may signal a shift towards more aggressive stances on various issues within the Republican party.

Strong Job Growth Report in the US Signals Economic Resilience

GLOBAL ECONOMY — Job growth in the US has shown remarkable strength, potentially positioning the economy for continued recovery.

The latest statistics indicate a significant increase in non-farm payrolls, defying previous predictions of a slowdown, and suggesting that the labour market remains robust. This development may bolster confidence in economic stability amid concerns about inflation and interest rate hikes.

Republicans Analyse Midterm Defeats and Shift Blame

DIPLOMACY — Following disappointing results in the midterm elections, Republicans are critically evaluating their strategies and assigning blame to external factors.

There’s a growing sentiment among party members that Israel‘s international actions may have negatively influenced voter perceptions. This self-reflection may lead to strategic realignments as they prepare for the next electoral cycle.

Florida Learjet Crash Investigation Underway Following Fatal Accident

GLOBAL SECURITY — A Learjet crash in Florida resulted in the deaths of multiple individuals, prompting an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the incident.

The accident has raised questions about possible mechanical failure, with authorities seeking to determine if the aircraft broke apart mid-flight. Investigators will examine the jet’s maintenance history and operational protocols to prevent future tragedies.

Vance’s Critique of Trump’s Presidency Following Election Losses

WORLD POLITICS — Republican candidate J.D. Vance has publicly critiqued Trump’s presidency, attributing recent electoral setbacks to his administration’s foreign policy decisions.

Vance’s comments indicate a shift within the party as members analyse the impact of international conflicts on domestic election outcomes. This internal critique could shape candidate positioning in upcoming elections and influence party strategy moving forward.

What to watch — The US political landscape may shift dramatically with Trump and a new chief of staff at the helm ahead of the 2024 elections.

Further reading from global news sources

The Guardian
Stephen Miller, architect of Trump’s immigration crackdown, to become White House chief of staff

BBC
With Stephen Miller pick, Trump readies for a battle

The Economist
World in Brief: Stephen Miller is Trump’s new chief of staff; Strong jobs growth in America

The Irish Times
Child (6) becomes latest victim of Waterford arson attack on home

Sky News
Boy, 6, dies in hospital after house fire that killed four members of his family

Iran war influences Democratic gains in US midterm elections

Get you up to speed: How the Iran war helped Democrats win the midterms

Iran’s response to US-Israeli attacks has significantly influenced the political landscape in the United States, resulting in the Democrats gaining control of both the Senate and the House of Representatives. The immediate situation reflects widespread voter discontent related to the economic impacts of the ongoing conflict, with many attributing their electoral choices to the escalating costs brought about by the war.

Voter concerns about the cost of living were cited as a major factor in the recent elections, with 90 per cent indicating it influenced their choices. Vice President JD Vance acknowledged the war as a key reason for the Republican loss, highlighting demands to end the conflict and change the relationship with Israel.

In response to the recent elections, Vice President JD Vance stated, “The reason we lost is the war,” while identifying voter demands to “End the war” and “Change our relationship to Israel.” This political shift has raised concerns over the cost of living and prompted calls for a reassessment of US foreign policy, particularly regarding military aid.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how the Democrats will address the deeper grievances among voters that predated the Iran war.

Iran war influences Democratic gains in US midterm elections

OPINIONOPINION, Opinion|US Midterm Elections 2026How the Iran war helped Democrats win the midterms

Trump sought to bring Iran to its knees. Instead, Tehran brought the costs of war into American homes, fuelling the backlash against his party.

This week, Iran’s response to the US-Israeli attacks led to one of the most dramatic political turnarounds in modern American history. Trump’s failed war on its own, however, is not why the Democrats pounded the Republicans and now control the Senate and House of Representatives for the next two years. Rather, it reflected and amplified many dynamics in American society that caused discontented, angry and fearful citizens to repudiate Trump’s Republicans and support Democrats.

The US president wrongly believed that his war on Iran would pummel the country into submission and turn it into a vassal state of the US and Israel. Iran survived, attacked the US, Israel and Arab lands, and brought the painful economic costs of war into every American home. It also humiliated Washington by revealing that America’s military prowess, like Trump’s behaviour and electoral promises, is erratic at best, and ineffective at worst.

The Iran war also sparked a cascade of consequences that hurt every American and, in some areas, exposed how national values such as democracy, equality and the rule of law, along with claims of global dominance, could prove illusory. Iran’s move with the greatest impact on ordinary Americans was restricting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, driving up the prices Americans paid for groceries, gasoline, diesel, travel, most imports and other everyday necessities. Some 90 percent of voters said the cost of living was a major or crucial factor in how they would vote.

This was compounded by the inability of the US and Israel to force Iran to surrender, even after months of brutal attacks on political leaders, infrastructure, civilian and economic sites, and military installations. Instead, Iran’s counterattacks left US bases in the Arabian Peninsula and Jordan incapacitated or evacuated, and caused huge damage to Arab energy and transport systems, disrupting global energy flows and driving up prices. The balance of the war was clear after the first few weeks: the pain the US and Israel inflicted on Iran would be matched by pain in every household in the US and other countries that assisted in the attack on Iran.

Iran simultaneously exposed critical flaws in American militarism, leaving ordinary Americans confused, frustrated and often humiliated in different ways:

a) Trump ignored Americans’ repeatedly expressed opposition to attacking Iran, along with the constitutional requirement for congressional authorisation of war. CBS exit polls confirmed that voters opposed the war for both its useless militarism and its impact on the economy. The Trump administration’s disdain for both the law and ordinary Americans’ views angered many voters who took their constitutional rights more seriously than Trump did. Many voters rejected Republicans because Trump had insincerely promised in 2024 that he would end useless foreign wars.

b) More narrowly, Trump attacked Iran without clear, consistent or credible strategic goals; his main stated reason for attacking was to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, a prospect Israeli officials repeatedly told him was imminent, even though existing US and international inspections and intelligence assessments had repeatedly found no evidence of this.

c) When it dawned on Americans that Trump went to war mainly because Israel pushed him to do so, they reacted negatively in two ways. They felt humiliated that their country’s immense military power was unable to achieve its stated goals; they also felt angry and demeaned that a small, dependent, foreign country like Israel, with its extensive and sophisticated lobbying power in the US, could initiate this calamity that hurt American households and damaged US standing and credibility abroad.

Behind the anger, vulnerability and helplessness of most Americans who voted Democratic this week were deeper grievances that predated the Iran war. These included citizens’ fury at outrageous corruption in Washington; the privileged oligarchs, political donors, bankers and corporations that saw the US as their personal profit centre more than anything else; military and high-tech sectors that were out of control and threatened innocent lives; over-aggressive anti-immigration policing; and corporate media that seemed more interested in serving all of the above, and Israel, than in conveying truth and facts to the American people.

The election brought together voters’ household economic concerns with questions of national morality and foreign policy. Equally noteworthy, the day after the vote, Vice President JD Vance wrote on social media: “The reason we lost is the war.” He identified four demands among voters who had turned away from the Republicans: “End the war”, “Focus on the cost of living and inflation”, “Put America First” and “Change our relationship to Israel”.

An unprecedented aspect of this election and Iran’s policies has been the centrality of the US-Israeli genocide in Palestine to many progressive Democrats’ campaigns and to Iran’s approach to war and peace. Vance’s explicit mention of Israel was startling enough in a political system that, for nearly a century, has largely shaped its West Asia policies according to Israeli demands. Equally striking was President Trump’s last-minute promise, on election day, to end the nearly $4bn in US military aid to Israel. It was another insincere Trump con job meant to deceive voters, because the money would not stop flowing but would simply be channelled differently. It also emphasised the huge impact that conditions in Israel-Palestine and US complicity in the genocide had on voters.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect WTX News’s editorial stance.

Eddy Haymour, notable Okanagan developer, dies at 96

What’s the Latest: One of Okanagan’s most colourful characters dies at 96

Okanagan developer Eddy Haymour died on Wednesday at the age of 96. He was known for his ambitious plans for Rattlesnake Island and his distinctive castle in Peachland, though he never realised his vision for the island.

Eddy Haymour’s legal battles regarding Rattlesnake Island began in 1971 after he purchased the property with plans for development, leading to a significant dispute with the provincial government that lasted for decades. Despite ultimately winning his legal battle, Haymour’s vision for the island remained unrealised, although he did construct his notable castle in Peachland, reflecting his enduring ambition.

Tributes for Eddy Haymour, the Okanagan developer who passed away at 96, have been pouring in, with local residents such as Don Scramstad commenting on his legacy of ambition and controversy. The Peachland Museum highlighted his commitment to his vision, with assistant curator Jeff Green stating, “He was zealously committed to his dream,” despite the lack of realisation of his plans for Rattlesnake Island.

What remains unclear — It is unclear why Eddy Haymour’s development plans for Rattlesnake Island ultimately never materialised despite his legal victory against the province.

Eddy Haymour, notable Okanagan developer, dies at 96

Eddy Haymour, a prominent and controversial figure in the Okanagan, has died at the age of 96. Known for his extravagant ambitions, Haymour’s life story includes a distinctive castle overlooking Highway 97 in Peachland and a fraught relationship with the provincial government over his dream of developing Rattlesnake Island.

Haymour purchased Rattlesnake Island in 1971, envisioning a Middle Eastern-themed amusement park. This vision caught the attention of filmmaker Greg Crompton, who described Haymour’s journey as “a very interesting story.” Crompton produced the 2019 documentary “Eddy’s Kingdom,” stating, “As a filmmaker… this one just seemed like such a compelling story to tell.”

His pursuit of this dream was marked by controversy, notably in 1974 when he and family members took hostages at the Canadian embassy in Beirut during a dispute with the province. Crompton remarked on Haymour’s unconventional mindset: “What? So, you were wronged by the government but then you were going to get some grenades and chuck it into the legislature and cause mayhem.”

At the Peachland Museum, Haymour is remembered as determined and visionary. Jeff Green, assistant curator, said, “He was zealously committed to his dream. It didn’t matter what obstacle was in his way; he pursued it to the end.” Although Haymour ultimately won a legal battle with the government, his vision for the island remained unrealised.

Despite the challenges he faced, Haymour constructed the iconic castle, which features a statue of himself pointing toward Rattlesnake Island. Tracy Janes, a customer service agent at the museum, reflected on his larger-than-life character, stating, “He was impassioned about what he was doing.” Haymour’s legacy continues to resonate within the community.

Democrats win House majority in 2026 midterm elections

Get you up to speed: 2026 House midterm election results as Democrats capture majority with major wins

Rep. Robert Garcia of California announced at a news conference that the House Oversight Committee will investigate the Trump family’s business dealings, corporate corruption, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. He named individuals including Stephen Miller, Corey Lewandowski, and Kristi Noem as targets for potential testimony before Congress.

The House Oversight Committee will focus on investigations into the Trump family’s business dealings, corporate corruption, and actions taken by the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Representative Robert Garcia stated that the committee has the authority to issue subpoenas and pursue civil contempt charges in response to non-compliance during investigations.

Rep. Robert Garcia announced that the House Oversight Committee will focus its investigations on various issues, including the Trump family’s business dealings and corporate corruption, while stating that individuals such as Stephen Miller and Corey Lewandowski may be called to testify. In response, White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis expressed that the President is open to collaboration but cautioned that if Democrats engage in what she termed “sham investigations,” they would be acting against the interests of the American people.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how the House Oversight Committee plans to enforce cooperation from individuals refusing to testify.

Democrats win House majority in 2026 midterm elections

Rep. Robert Garcia of California, who will be the chairman of the House Oversight Committee next Congress, laid out four areas where the panel will focus its investigative efforts. 

The overarching investigations include the Trump family’s business dealings, corporate corruption, actions of the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. 

“I think folks that need to be concerned first are administration officials that have caused real harm. We’re going to investigate the abuses,” Garcia said at a news conference in his district on Wednesday. 

Garcia singled out Stephen Miller, Corey Lewandowski and Kristi Noem, as well as members of the Trump family. 

“There’s a lot of folks that need to understand that we are going to ask them to testify in front of the U.S. Congress,” Garcia said. 

Garcia acknowledged that the Justice Department under the Trump administration is unlikely to enforce any consequences for those who do not cooperate with the panel’s investigations. But he said that in the majority, Democrats will have the power to sue on behalf of the House. 

“And secondly, we have the power of contempt charges. And contempt charges not only go to the DOJ, there’s also a civil contempt process that goes to the courts,” he said. 

Asked about the potential for Democrat-led investigations, White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis said: “As the President has said, he’s willing to work with anyone to continue delivering victories for hardworking Americans. If Democrats choose to pursue sham investigations and radical left policies, they are choosing to work against the American people.”

LIVE German 2025 Election