LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Supporters of trans rights rally in Saskatchewan against Bill 137

Get you up to speed: Sask. trans rights supporters rally across province against Bill 137

Protests were held in Saskatoon and Regina against a law deemed to have created unsafe spaces for youth since its passage three years ago. Those in attendance expressed their concerns regarding the law’s impact on the community.

The law, passed three years ago, has been a focal point of concern for youth safety, prompting the protests in Saskatoon and Regina. Ongoing discussions among community groups are expected to continue as they seek to address the implications of the legislation.

Officials from the Saskatchewan government acknowledged concerns raised by protesters regarding the impact of the law on youth safety, stating they will review the legislation. In response, several advocacy groups are calling for immediate reforms to ensure safer environments for young people, with further demonstrations planned in the coming weeks.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how many youth have been affected by the law since its implementation.

Supporters of trans rights rally in Saskatchewan against Bill 137

Supporters of trans rights rally in Saskatchewan against Bill 137
Those attending the rallies in Saskatoon and Regina say the law has created unsafe spaces for many youth since it was passed three years ago.

Federal judge orders Trump administration to cancel taxpayer-funded ads

Get you up to speed: Trump administration ordered to cancel taxpayer-funded TV ads

A federal judge in New York ordered President Trump to cancel any remaining taxpayer-funded television ads promoting his political message, granting a temporary restraining order that took effect at 6:45 p.m. ET on Sunday. The ruling followed a challenge by a coalition, including Common Cause, which argued that the ads represented an illegal misuse of funds.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued a temporary restraining order effective from 6:45 p.m. ET on Sunday, prohibiting the administration from airing or expanding the controversial ads. The Department of Homeland Security awarded $20 million for the campaign, which began on September 20, with the funding drawn from taxpayer money intended for border security efforts.

A federal judge ordered President Trump to cancel any remaining taxpayer-funded advertisements after ruling they represented an illegal misuse of funds, asserting they violate statutes against using appropriated money for political propaganda. In response to the ruling, the White House indicated an end to the ad campaign, while Trump stated he would finance future ads through campaign donations, leaving questions about reimbursement for expenditures already incurred.

What remains unclear — It is not specified whether the administration will reimburse the government for the funds already spent on the ads.

Federal judge orders Trump administration to cancel taxpayer-funded ads

President Trump must cancel any remaining television commercials paid for with millions of dollars in taxpayer money to promote his political message, a federal judge ordered Sunday night, even as the administration said the ad campaign was coming to an end.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York sided with a coalition, including the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause, that challenged the ads as an illegal misuse of funds. She told the administration to cancel any remaining ads, including any set to air Sunday night, in granting a temporary restraining order.

“Defendants shall not enter into, renew, or expand any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements” during the two-week duration of her order, the judge said.

The order was in effect as of 6:45 p.m. ET on Sunday.  

Asked for comment, the White House referred to an Oct. 5 social media post from Mr. Trump in which he defended the taxpayer-funded ads as “rather standard” but, amid backlash, said he would pay for them from his political fundraising. In a court filing late Saturday, the Justice Department argued that the temporary restraining order was unnecessary because “the alleged offending conduct will end tomorrow.”

The Department of Homeland Security tapped $20 million in taxpayer money for the ads. Legal experts have suggested that violated a federal statute against congressionally appropriated money being used for “publicity or propaganda” and potentially other laws.

“We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,” the plaintiffs said in a statement issued by Democracy Forward, the nonprofit legal organization that represents them. “There is no legal justification — and no precedent — for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda.”

In a court declaration Saturday, senior DHS official Holly Mehringer wrote that the money came from funds appropriated by Congress that are “available for, among other things, ‘commemorating efforts and events related to border security.'”

The Department of Homeland Security awarded LMD Agency $20 million for a “National Media Campaign” starting on Sept. 20, contracting records show. A day earlier, the White House Office of Management and Budget granted DHS’s Customs and Border Protection $20 million for “OBBB Commemorative Events,” according to a nongovernment database. The source of the funds was first reported by The Washington Sun.  

The White House has defended the ads as public service announcements akin to what past administrations have done to promote various policies. But the recent ads differ from many past public service announcements because they aren’t aimed at helping members of the public benefit from specific government programs.

A White House official said last month the PSAs “are clearly not political,” and noted: “The President is not on the ballot and the ads don’t have a call to action.”

The ads, which began airing in late September, glorify Mr. Trump and echo his political messaging going into the midterms. One features a clip of Trump talking about the threat of communism and another is a replay of an ad from his last presidential campaign. The fifth ad in the campaign began airing Tuesday, focusing on the Trump administration’s capture of former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

The use of public funds to pay for the ads drew heavy criticism — including from some in the GOP.

“It shouldn’t be paid for with taxpayer dollars,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters.

On “Face the Nation,” GOP Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said last month, “I don’t think any public official, including President Trump or [former DHS Secretary] Kristi Noem or John Kennedy, should spend public money on private ads for themselves.”

The Democratic National Committee has separately sued the Republican administration over the ads.

“This is the sort of government propaganda one might expect in North Korea, not the United States of America, and it is an egregious and illegal misuse of Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars,” a group of Senate Democrats said in a letter last month.

Amid the backlash, Mr. Trump said he would start paying for the ads with a campaign account. A White House official said there were no immediate plans to reimburse the government for money already spent.

Additionally, attorneys for artist JMSN, whose song “Love Me” was used in one of the ads, last month sent a cease-and-desist letter to White House chief of staff Susie Wiles demanding that the Trump administration stop using his song.  

“To anybody who has followed my career and knows what I stand for and built my career on, it should go without saying that I would never authorize my music to be used for ANY political agenda or campaign,” the artist posted on social media.

Teenagers in Dagenham hospitalised after knife attack streamed live on TikTok

Get you up to speed: Knife attack ‘streamed live on TikTok’ leaves teens fighting for life | News UK

A 19-year-old man was found with critical stab injuries at 6:30 PM on Friday in Terrace Walk, Dagenham, and a 17-year-old boy was later discovered with serious wounds in nearby Fanshawe Crescent. Two individuals have been arrested on suspicion of affray and possession of an offensive weapon.

Two teenagers remain in critical condition following the stabbing incident that took place on Friday evening. The WTXpolitan Police have arrested two individuals on suspicion of affray and possession of an offensive weapon as part of an ongoing investigation into the incident.

The WTXpolitan Police confirmed that two teenagers are in critical condition following the attack, with two other individuals arrested on suspicions of affray and possession of an offensive weapon. Authorities have yet to announce further measures but are expected to intensify patrols in the area in response to public concern over safety.

What remains unclear — Authorities have not disclosed the condition of the two teenagers fighting for their lives in hospital.

Teenagers in Dagenham hospitalised after knife attack streamed live on TikTok

Teenagers in Dagenham hospitalised after knife attack streamed live on TikTok
A man holding a zombie knife lunges at the camera in the shocking clip (Picture: TikTok)

An alleged zombie knife ambush on teenagers was caught on a TikTok live stream.

The clashing of zombie knives can be heard amid screams as they appear to duel in the middle of the street. Cars sound horns in the background as others drive past.

People in the comments shout out instructions to the person filming. One shouts out ‘wet him’ – slang for stab him.

At one point the person filming seemingly brings out his own knife in an attempt to see off the attacker.

Knife attack leaving teens fighting for life 'streamed live on TikTok' Officers were called at about 18:10 BST on Friday to Terrace Walk in Dagenham, where a 19-year-old man was found with stab injuries and taken to hospital.

One follower shouts on the stream: ‘Put the phone away.’

But another disagrees, shouting: ‘Don’t put your phone away.’

A young man in a balaclava is seen holding a knife in the air and making lunges towards the camera as the sun sets behind him.

The person holding the camera then runs away before the live stream pauses – the message reading: ‘Live paused – The creator will be back soon.’

One person commented on the live stream: ‘Am I watching a true crime documentary?’

Two teenagers are now fighting for life in hospital following the ambush in Dagenham on Friday.

Latest London news

To get the latest news from the capital, visit WTX’s London news hub.

A 19-year-old man was found with critical stab injuries at 6.30pm, police said. Minutes later, a 17-year-old boy was also found with serious knife wounds in nearby Fanshawe Crescent.

Two others have been arrested on suspicion of affray and possession of an offensive weapon, the WTXpolitan Police said.

Pope Leo to have surgery this week to remove lung nodule

Get you up to speed: Pope Leo reveals he will have surgery to remove a lung nodule | News World

Pope Leo XIV announced today in St. Peter’s Square that he will undergo surgery to remove a ‘localised nodule’ in his lung, detected during recent medical tests. The surgery is scheduled to take place this week at Rome’s Gemelli Hospital, with a recovery period of approximately one week.

Pope Leo is scheduled to have surgery later this week at Rome’s Gemelli Hospital to remove a localized nodule in his lung. Vatican spokesperson Matteo Bruni indicated that the recovery period is expected to last approximately one week following the operation.

Pope Leo announced today that he will undergo surgery this week to remove a “localised nodule” from his lung, a decision made following medical advice. Vatican spokesperson Matteo Bruni confirmed the operation will take place at Rome’s Gemelli Hospital, with an expected recovery period of approximately one week.

What remains unclear — It is not specified when Pope Leo will be discharged from the hospital following his surgery.

Pope Leo to have surgery this week to remove lung nodule

Pope Leo to have surgery this week to remove lung nodule
Pope Leo made the announcement in St Peter’s Square today (Picture: AP)

Pope Leo announced today that he will undergo surgery to remove a ‘localised nodule’ in his lung.

During Sunday prayers in St. Peter’s Square today, he told onlookers: ‘Recently, during some medical tests, doctors discovered a localised nodule in my lung.

‘It was detected at a very early stage and is well localised. The doctors believe it is best to intervene, so, following their advice, I have decided to undergo surgery to have it removed.’

It’s understood that the pontiff will have the surgery this week, and he told the crowd he ‘entrusts himself’ to their prayers.

Vatican spokesperson Matteo Bruni confirmed the operation will take place this week and it will take roughly a week for Pope Leo to recover.

VATICAN CITY, VATICAN - OCTOBER 11: (EDITOR NOTE: STRICTLY EDITORIAL USE ONLY - NO MERCHANDISING). Pope Leo XIV blesses faithful as he holds the Sunday Angelus prayer from his studio overlooking St. Peter's Square on October 11, 2026 in Vatican City, Vatican. Pope Leo XIV revealed that he is set to undergo surgery to remove a ???localized nodule in my lung,??? noting that it is at a ???very early stage and is well localized.??? The operation will take place in the coming days at Rome's Gemelli Hospital. Pope Leo XIV told the faithful gathered for the Angelus on Sunday that his doctors have found a ???a localized nodule??? in his lung and he will be operated on in a few days. The medical procedure will take place at Rome's Gemelli Hospital. (Photo by Elisabetta Trevisan - Vatican Media via Vatican Pool/Getty Images)
Pope Leo will undergo surgery this week (Picture: Getty)

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Robert Francis Prevost, 71, was named the first American to serve as Pope in 2025.

The Pope was born in Chicago and was made cardinal by Francis in 2023.

This past week, Pope Leo declared capital punishment ‘inadmissible’ following plans for the United States to livestream an execution by firing squad.

In a post on X, the pontiff said the death penalty ‘attacks the inherent dignity of a human being’.

He wrote: ‘The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment.

‘Effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption.’

The US Defence Department announced Thursday its intention to livestream the firing squad execution of Nidal Malik Hasan, who was convicted in 2009 of killing 13 people and wounding 32 others in a shooting spree at Fort Hood military base.

Leo didn’t refer specifically to the planned execution or the botched killing in Tennessee of Christa Pike, which saw the killer survive two attempted lethal injections. However, his post came just hours after his top deputy, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, said explicitly that the planned US public execution was ‘unacceptable’.

Pope Francis previously declared capital punishment ‘inadmissible’.

Meanwhile, the head of the US bishops conference, Archbishop Paul Coakley, expressed ‘shock’ and ‘great sorrow’ at the Pentagon’s plans.

‘In no way can Hasan’s actions be condoned, but this decision is a barbaric promotion of a culture of death and must be reconsidered,’ he said in a statement Friday.

‘The public execution even of one who has done grave harm will only further undermine the moral fabric of our nation and be a blight on the conscience of its people.’

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

Saskatchewan man identified among six victims of air ambulance crash off Massachusetts

Get you up to speed: Sask. man among 6 identified in air ambulance crash off Massachusetts coast

An air ambulance carrying six people, including first officer Thomas (Tommy) Henry Farquhar, crashed while travelling from Bermuda to Boston. Immediate details regarding casualties have not been confirmed.

The crash is under investigation by aviation authorities, and no further information has been disclosed regarding the condition of the survivors. The aircraft was an air ambulance, indicating it was operating under specific regulations for medical transport at the time of the incident.

Officials have confirmed that an investigation into the air ambulance crash involving Thomas Henry Farquhar is underway, with local authorities coordinating with national air safety agencies. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation plans to hold a press conference to update the public on findings and future safety measures related to air ambulance operations.

What remains unclear — The cause of the crash remains under investigation.

Saskatchewan man identified among six victims of air ambulance crash off Massachusetts

sask pilot crash
Thomas (Tommy) Henry Farquhar was serving as the first officer on an air ambulance that crashed with six people on board while travelling from Bermuda to Boston.

Transcript of interview with Senator John Barrasso, October 11, 2026

Get you up to speed: Transcript: Sen. John Barrasso on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Oct. 11, 2026

Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso spoke on “Face the Nation” about the impact of high fuel prices on American farmers and ranchers in Casper, Wyoming. He discussed President Trump’s announcement to import Russian diesel fuel amid existing congressional bans on Russian energy imports.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has stated it will oversee any investigation into U.S. Ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle. Reports suggest concerns about her actions and possible ethics violations, and the State Department is expected to conduct a formal inquiry.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso expressed concern over President Trump’s recent announcement to import Russian diesel fuel, asserting this decision may contradict laws against Russian energy imports; he stated, “The president is balancing his effort to stop… Putin’s war in Ukraine and lowering prices for American families.” As campaigning intensifies ahead of the midterm elections, Barrasso emphasised the necessity for increased American energy production and warned that Democrats are obstructing efforts to achieve lower energy prices.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether the State Department is currently conducting an investigation into Ambassador Kimberly Guilfoyle’s actions.

Transcript of interview with Senator John Barrasso, October 11, 2026

The following is the transcript of the interview with Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Oct. 11, 2026.


MARGARET BRENNAN: And we turn now to Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso, who joins us from Casper, Wyoming. Good morning to you, Senator.

SEN. JOHN BARRASSO: Well, it’s great to be here in Wyoming. I’ll be hitting the trail again tomorrow. It was interesting listening to Chris Murphy ignoring the craziness of the Democrat candidates for the Senate, and that’s why I’m going to be out talking about the difference between the common sense Republicans who I’m supporting and our party is.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. JOHN BARRASSO: And the crazy Democrats who’ve been nominated and are now causing the direction of their party to go way to the left.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, I understand you are headed to Midwest and the West. Of the 10 Senate battleground races WTX is tracking, six are Republican held seats. How challenging is this midterm going to be for your party?

SEN. BARRASSO: Well, I’m optimistic with opportunities to pick up seats. New Hampshire, Michigan, Minnesota- you talk about corruption, that’s what we’re seeing in Minnesota in their state run by the- the Democrats. In Michigan, I don’t know if you saw the debate this past week. El-Sayed was on, the Democrat nominee for the Senate in Michigan against Mike Rogers. He was asked, “Who’s more of a threat to the United States, Iran or Israel?” He could not answer and refused to answer the question. Everyone in the world knows that Iran is much more of a threat to the United States. They chant, “Death to America.” Israel is our friend and ally. He would not admit it. Iran is at war with the United States. They’ve been killing Americans for 50 years, and the candidate in Michigan is so extreme that he will not even admit the reality of what the American people see.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the Republican candidate in Michigan has tried to distance himself from the very war you’re talking about though. Mike Rogers has talked about the Iran war has got to end. He’s acknowledging that the high fuel prices related to it are a problem for him. How do you explain that?

SEN. BARRASSO: Well, everyone wants the war to end. Everyone wants fuel prices to come down who’s a Republican. Democrats don’t seem to want fuel prices to come down. They like high fuel prices. They were a lot higher when Biden was in office than they are today. And when you look about the lawsuits that the Democrats are bringing, you look about the fact that in- in California this past year they shut down two refineries. They are against fossil fuels.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well–

SEN. BARRASSO: Last week at the Supreme Court, there was a lawsuit to say–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. BARRASSO: –we want to sue. They do- the Democrats sue oil companies for making gasoline because they say it contributes to climate change.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, it’s- Colorado–

SEN. BARRASSO: Democrats want high gas prices. They want us in electric vehicles, and that’s- that’s the difference.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. BARRASSO: That’s the difference between common sense–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay.

SEN. BARRASSO: –Republicans and these crazy Democrats who’ve been nominated all around the country.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, Senator, I don’t- I don’t mean to cut you off. I want to let you finish this in a minute when we have more time. So, stay with us while we take the commercial break, and we’ll talk on the other side.

[ANNOUNCEMENTS]

MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome back to Face the Nation. We return now to our conversation with Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming. Senator, we’re talking about those upcoming midterm races and the pressure of higher fuel prices. We saw President Trump on Friday announce he’s going to start importing Russian diesel fuel to help American farmers, ranchers, and truckers, as he put it. Congress banned Russian energy imports back in 2022. And even more recently, they put in place more possible financial penalties to the buyers of Russian oil. Doesn’t the president’s action violate the laws? And- and how do you justify giving Vladimir Putin a lifeline?

SEN. BARRASSO: Well, the president is focused on getting down the cost of energy. He’s focused on ranchers, farmers, truckers, as you said. I’m right in the middle of that here in Wyoming. This is cattle country. I heard it last night in an event that I was at- the high diesel prices that are impacting everyone. The president is balancing and has to make tough decisions. He’s balancing his effort to stop and end the war of- Putin’s war in Ukraine and lowering prices for American families. What we really need to do long-term is produce more American energy, but we’re running into a problem with the Democrats who want us to produce less American energy and want high energy prices. So, I know what the president is trying to do. I agree, we need to lower the prices and the problem is the Democrats are blocking us long-term from doing what’s going to be best for the American people.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well–

SEN. BARRASSO: We all want this war to end. We want to do it as quickly as possible in a way that Ukraine is protected with long-term peace and that energy prices come down. And the sooner that happens, the safer America will be–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. BARRASSO: –and the lower prices will be for American consumers.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But letting Russia sell oil would seem to put money and more mobility to Vladimir Putin and not necessarily make a dent in diesel prices, according to most energy analysts that I’ve read. Former Vice President Pence said the decision to lift sanctions on Russian fuel makes no sense and is a betrayal to the legacy and leadership of the late Senator Lindsey Graham. He’s talking about that Graham Law you voted for. And I know you’ve got to make a decision by October 18, at least the president does, about putting in place the powers you helped to give him to punish buyers of Russian oil. Doesn’t the president’s action make a mockery of that law you just passed?

SEN. BARRASSO: We passed that law to give the president the flexibility and the firepower to use another tool against Vladimir Putin. We want to end this war. We want to get fuel prices down. The president wants that as well. This is just another point of leverage for the president to use against Putin in an effort to get a long-term solution in that- in that part of the world. So, I want him to- I voted for that law. The president signed that law. And he needs to use that because he now has the flexibility to do it in the best interest of world peace and lower energy prices here in America. 

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about your role on Senate Foreign Relations. You have oversight there. The Wall Street Journal has had a series of reports about the U.S. Ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle. Can you confirm at all that there is an investigation on some level into her actions? Perhaps an inspector general probe, if not something more on the ethics front?

SEN. BARRASSO: Well, what we’ve seen in the reports is very troubling. It’s concerning and I’m sure there’s going to be an investigation. I would assume the State Department would be conducting that. I know that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will have oversight and look into that as well. But I think the public has a right to know what was- what is found. And it is a- quite a bit of concern.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah. I mean, among the things that were made public by a Trump donor were text messages in which she asked him to give her $100,000 to pay off credit card debt and asked not to put some of these things in writing because it could endanger her job. Are you comfortable with any U.S. official asking someone to pay off debt in exchange for access to government officials?

SEN. BARRASSO: No, I’m not. And you know, we’re going to be back after the elections, but for the next three weeks, we’re going to be out campaigning across the country, and I’m sure we’ll discuss that later. But the focus today is making sure that the American people know just how far to the left the Democrats have gone. And they are now the party, and they have- they have a manifesto. And you highlighted one of the candidates from Florida–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. BARRASSO: –the Democrat nominee in Florida. They want to eliminate Immigration and Customs Enforcement, open the border. They want to open the prisons, put these people into our communities. They want to defund the military, defund the police, raise taxes to pay for health care–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well–

SEN. BARRASSO: –for illegal immigrants, and have boys in girls locker rooms. And when you were on with Murphy and you’d asked about the military–

MARGARET BRENNA: Yeah.

SEN. BARRASSO: –the Democrats have blocked the National Defense Authorization Act.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. BARRASSO: He says, “well, we ought to not fund things.” This is the first–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well–

SEN. BARRASSO: –time in 65 years that we’ve not passed a National Defense Authorization Act, which funds the military, makes sure–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.

SEN. BARRASSO: –they have what they need to be able to be the warfighters that they are.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.

SEN. BARRASSO: And yet the Democrats are all voting no on supporting our troops.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, he said that he did want more information. He said that briefings weren’t being shared, details weren’t being shared. So, approving money without those briefings is something he said he was not willing to do. Would you ask the administration to be more forthcoming and give details, including on these damage to bases?

SEN. BARRASSO: Well, you’re talking appropriation, I’m talking about the actual authorization act to get- make sure the military has what they want. The Democrats in the Senate–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Got it.

SEN. BARRASSO: –are so afraid of these candidates who have won nominations in primary elections, that when those candidates and their manifesto calls for defunding the military, all the Democrats in the Senate voted against the National Defense Authorization Act. And that’s just wrong.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Barrasso, we will watch what you get done in- on the campaign trail and when we get back to work in November. Thank you for your time. We’ll be right back.

LIVE German 2025 Election