Latest News
- England and Argentina end first half of World Cup semifinal goalless
- Chiefs call for criminalisation of residential school denialism as hate speech
- Blanche confirms absence of “anti-weaponization” fund at Senate hearing
- Young Sikh mother Kirandeep Kaur, 24, killed in reported stabbing incident
- British man sentenced to an additional two years in Iran for speaking to media
- European Commission seeks exemptions for EU products from US tariffs
- ICE Halts Most Vehicle Stops Following Fatal Shootings Amid Safety Review
- EU countries extend temporary protection for Ukrainian refugees until March 2028.
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
England and Argentina end first half of World Cup semifinal goalless
9:00 pm
Get you up to speed: What happened in the first half of the England vs Argentina semifinal?
In the first half of the World Cup semifinal in Atlanta, England faced Argentina, resulting in heated exchanges but no goals. Both teams committed multiple fouls, with England recording seven and Argentina twelve, as the first half ended goalless.
The match featured seven fouls by England compared to twelve by Argentina, highlighting a tense atmosphere on the pitch. Both teams were issued one yellow card each, with England’s Elliott Anderson receiving a caution in the 38th minute and Argentina’s Martínez booked shortly thereafter.
Both teams received one card each in a fiercely contested first half, with England’s Elliott Anderson booked for a foul on Lionel Messi at the 38th minute. As the match progresses, tensions remain high, indicating that further disciplinary action may be necessary if the physical play continues.
What remains unclear — It is unknown how the players’ physical exchanges will impact the match’s overall dynamic and referee decisions moving forward.
England and Argentina end first half of World Cup semifinal goalless
Sport|World Cup 2026What happened in the first half of the England vs Argentina semifinal?
All the biggest moments, heated exchanges, fouls and stats from the first 45 minutes of the heated semifinal in Atlanta.
Published On 15 Jul 202615 Jul 2026
Heated exchanges between players, contested fouls, but no goals marked the first half of the World Cup semifinal between England and Argentina in Atlanta.
The highly anticipated match on Wednesday is being played in a tense atmosphere as the reigning world champions face a top-10 ranked team for the first time in the tournament.
The match heated up quickly, as arms went flying and words were exchanged between players from both sides, but the first half ended with everything except a goal or even a shot on goal.
What were the key moments of the England vs Argentina World Cup semifinal?
Two minutes into the match, Jude Bellingham was fouled by Leandro Paredes with an elbow shove in the face.
Another couple of minutes in, an Elliott Anderson challenge on Lionel Messi brought down the Argentina captain and earned the England player a retaliatory foul from Enzo Fernandez. The referee remained uninterested, though, leaving the England bench howling.
Anderson earned England their second free kick as he was fouled by Giuliano Simeone in the seventh minute, but England failed to convert it into anything.
England kept the ball in the Argentinian half, building attacks on the left flank, but were unable to convert them into shots on goal.
In the 13th minute, Anderson and Fernandez were at it again, and they looked ready to full-on clash on the pitch, with Morgan Rogers and Paredes joining the party. England believed they were wronged by the Argentinian midfielder as head coach Thomas Tuchel remonstrated on the touchline. Yet again, no cards came out.
How many cards were given in the England vs Argentina semifinal?
Both teams received one card each, starting with Anderson in the 38th minute for his challenge on Messi, which brought together players from both teams in a heated scuffle.
Soon after, in the 42nd minute, Argentina’s Martinez was booked for pulling back Rogers, which Martinez reacted to in protest before the match continued.
How many fouls were made in the first half of the semifinal?
England had seven fouls, while Argentina had 12.
What were the head-to-head stats in the first half of the England vs Argentina semifinal?
England enjoyed 44 percent possession, with Argentina dominating with 56 percent.
Chiefs call for criminalisation of residential school denialism as hate speech
7:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Chiefs want residential school denialism criminalized as hate speech
First Nations chiefs have accused the federal government of enabling residential school denialism. They assert that the government is not taking adequate action to make this denialism a crime.
First Nations chiefs have called for legislative action, stating that the current lack of criminal designation for residential school denialism undermines efforts towards reconciliation. An investigation into the implications of this stance is ongoing, with discussions expected to continue in the coming months.
First Nations chiefs have expressed that the federal government is enabling residential school denialism by not criminalising such denials. In response, they are calling for immediate legislative action to address this issue and prevent further misinformation.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain what specific actions the federal government plans to take in response to the chiefs’ concerns.
Chiefs call for criminalisation of residential school denialism as hate speech
First Nations chiefs say the federal government is enabling residential school denialism by failing to make it a crime.
Blanche confirms absence of “anti-weaponization” fund at Senate hearing
5:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Blanche reiterates that “anti-weaponization” fund is “dead” at Senate confirmation hearing
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the Justice Department will not proceed with a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund linked to a settlement involving President Trump, stating that “the weaponization fund is dead.” This development occurred during Blanche’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he faced bipartisan criticism regarding the settlement’s provisions.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that the Justice Department has not modified the settlement agreement regarding the $1.8 billion fund, and no amendments have been filed in federal court. A federal judge in Miami recently sanctioned an attorney for Mr. Trump and questioned the ethical conduct of officials involved, while both parties have yet to formally address potential enforcement of the settlement.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed the Justice Department will not move forward with the $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, stating, “The weaponization fund is dead.” Despite bipartisan concerns from senators regarding the handling of the settlement, Blanche acknowledged the agreement remains enforceable, indicating that President Trump’s legal team could potentially challenge it, although no plans to do so have been confirmed.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether President Trump’s counsel plans to enforce the settlement agreement in the future.
Blanche confirms absence of “anti-weaponization” fund at Senate hearing
Washington — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche reiterated on Wednesday that the Justice Department has no plans to launch a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund at the heart of a controversial settlement between President Trump and the IRS, even though language in the settlement agreement filed in a federal court has yet to be amended by the parties.
“It is a moot issue, meaning there is no weaponization fund. The weaponization fund is dead,” Blanche told lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he appeared for his confirmation hearing to serve as Attorney General.
Blanche has faced staunch bipartisan criticism over the settlement, which called for the creation of the new fund at the Justice Department to pay victims of so-called government “weaponization” and granted immunity to Mr. Trump, his two oldest sons, his company and related companies from future tax claims. Earlier this week, a federal judge in Miami rebuked the Justice Department and sanctioned an attorney for Mr. Trump in the IRS case, finding the president pursued the lawsuit “for an improper purpose.”
The ruling raised questions about whether Blanche and Stanley Woodward, the No. 3 official at the Justice Department, violated ethical rules. It barred them from citing the provisions of the deal as evidence of a settlement in any formal court or government proceeding.
Both Democratic and Republican senators on Wednesday repeatedly raised concerns about the way the Justice Department has handled the case, noting that the settlement expressly states that any changes to it must be agreed upon by all parties involved. To date, no one from either the government or Mr. Trump’s personal legal team have formally filed amendments to the settlement in federal court.
Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, reading from the settlement on Wednesday, noted that it says the terms of the deal “may be modified only upon the written agreement of the parties.”
“Has there been a written agreement of the parties to modify the settlement fund?” he asked.
“No, the settlement fund is just not moving forward,” Blanche responded. “There’s no modification. It never started. No money went from the Treasury to any other account.”
When pressed, however, as to whether the settlement agreement may be enforceable by the parties, Blanche conceded that the president could challenge it down the road.
“Yes, it’s an enforceable document, so I suppose if President Trump’s counsel sought to enforce it, that they potentially could … try to enforce the contract. They can’t force the Department of Justice to move forward with the weaponization fund. They could potentially say that we breached by not moving forward,” Blanche said. “They haven’t done that, and I’m not aware that they’re planning on doing that.”
Young Sikh mother Kirandeep Kaur, 24, killed in reported stabbing incident
4:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Kirandeep Kaur: First picture of Sikh mum, 24, stabbed to death in what parents fear was ‘racist attack’ | News UK
Kirandeep Kaur, 24, was reportedly stabbed to death in her home on Uxbridge Road early on Sunday morning, shortly after giving birth. A 44-year-old man has been charged with murder, attempted murder, and possession of a bladed article following the incident.
WTXpolitan Police have identified Daniel Sean James, 44, who has been charged with murder, attempted murder, and possession of a bladed article. Although authorities are investigating all lines of inquiry, they have stated that there is currently no evidence to suggest this incident was a hate crime.
The Sri Guru Singh Sabha in Southall expressed deep sadness over the murder of Kirandeep Kaur, urging authorities to ensure a thorough and transparent investigation. Daniel Sean James, 44, has been charged with murder, attempted murder, and possession of a bladed article, with police keeping an open mind regarding the motive.
What remains unclear — It is not confirmed whether the attack on Kirandeep Kaur is being treated as a hate crime despite assertions from her family.
Young Sikh mother Kirandeep Kaur, 24, killed in reported stabbing incident
This is the first picture of a Sikh woman allegedly stabbed to death when a knifeman burst into her home as she slept.
Kirandeep Kaur, 24, had given birth just a few weeks ago when she was attacked in Uxbridge Road on Sunday morning.
The victim, who had moved to the United Kingdom nearly two years ago on a student visa, was later granted a work permit and had been living and working there.
WTXpolitan Police said they ‘quickly’ found a 44-year-old man nearby who matched the description of the suspect. He had suffered injuries consistent with jumping out of a window.
Kirandeep’s father Sukhdev Singh and mother Baljeet Kaur sold all of their farmland in the Punjab, India so she could move to the UK and study.
They hoped she would build a better future for the family and eventually help her siblings settle overseas.
They told local media PTC News that an unidentified assailant entered her bedroom and attacked her with a sharp-edged weapon in what they believed was a racist attack.
Her parents demanded that their daughter’s body be brought back to India and that those responsible for her death be brought to justice.
Her brother-in-law, Sahib, was at the crime scene on Monday. He told WTX: ‘She had just had a baby. The family were so happy. We are heartbroken. She was a wonderful mother.’
Sahib’s brother, who is married to Kiran, was also injured and is recovering with family, he claimed.
Latest London news
To get the latest news from the capital, visit WTX’s London news hub.
Meanwhile the victim’s neighbour, Ruby, described her as a ‘friendly, smiley young mum’ who doted on her newborn baby.
She told WTX: ‘She was really nice, just a smiley, friendly young lady. I can’t imagine why this would have happened.
‘I didn’t hear anything overnight, but then, first thing in the morning, there were police everywhere.
‘She had just had a baby very recently. She looked so happy being a mum.
‘The baby is so cute and we were all so pleased for the mum. We are all heartbroken.’
Kirandeep’s place of worship, Sri Guru Singh Sabha in Southall, said they were ‘deeply saddened and shocked by the heinous murder’.
They said: ‘The loss of a young life in such violent circumstances has profoundly affected our congregation and the wider community. Every person has the right to live free from violence and fear, and incidents such as this leave lasting scars on families and neighbourhoods alike.
‘We call upon the authorities to ensure that this case is investigated thoroughly, transparently and with the utmost diligence so that justice is served for Kirandeep and her family.’
A Met spokesperson said: ‘Although there is no evidence this was a hate crime at this stage, investigators are keeping an open mind and exploring every line of enquiry.’
Daniel Sean James, 44, of Mercer Place, Pinner, was charged with murder, attempted murder and possession of a bladed article.
British man sentenced to an additional two years in Iran for speaking to media
3:00 pm
Get you up to speed: British man jailed in Iran has ‘unjustifiable’ sentence extended by two years | News World
Craig Foreman and his wife, Lindsay, have been sentenced to an additional two years in prison in Iran for speaking to media outlets, following a previous conviction for espionage. The couple was arrested in January 2025 while travelling through Iran on a motorcycle and are currently held in Tehran’s Evin prison.
The British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) is actively engaging with Iranian authorities regarding the recent additional sentence imposed on Craig Foreman. Currently, he and his wife, Lindsay Foreman, are in Tehran’s Evin prison, with their son reporting ongoing hunger strikes that have reached 68 days for Mr Foreman and 59 days for Mrs Foreman.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) is “urgently following up with the Iranian authorities about the reported increased sentence” for Craig Foreman, who faces an additional two years for speaking to the media. Meanwhile, the family has welcomed the appointment of Alistair Burt as the UK’s first envoy for complex consular cases, as they continue to campaign for the couple’s release amid ongoing concerns for their welfare, exacerbated by their hunger strikes.
What remains unclear — It is not clear why Craig Foreman was not provided with legal representation or a translator during his sentencing.
British man sentenced to an additional two years in Iran for speaking to media
Lindsay and Craig had been travelling around the world on their motorcycle when they were detained (Picture: PA)
The family of a British man jailed in Iran on spying charges says he has been sentenced to an additional two years in prison.
Craig Foreman and his wife, Lindsay, were sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment in February after being convicted of espionage, charges they both deny.
This week, their family revealed Mr Foreman had been given an additional two-year sentence for speaking to media outlets.
The couple, from East Sussex, were arrested in January 2025 while travelling through Iran during a round-the-world motorcycle trip. They are being held in Tehran’s infamous Evin prison.
Their son, Joe Bennett, said the family was ‘extremely concerned’ by the reports.
London to mark 500 days since Lindsay and Craig Foreman were arbitrarily detained in Iran whilst travelling through the country on their motorbike. Picture date: Wednesday May 20, 2026. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Jonathan Brady/PA Wire” decoding=”async” loading=”lazy”/>
Their son has been campaigning for their release (Picture: PA)
Sign up for all of the latest stories
‘We have received extremely concerning reports that Craig has been sentenced to a further two years in prison,’ he said.
‘We understand he was told he was being taken to see his lawyer, but was instead brought before a judge and informed of the additional sentence.
‘Despite requests, he was allowed no lawyer, no translator and no opportunity to defend himself. He was told the two years had been added because he had spoken to the press.
‘We didn’t think we could be any more shocked at their appalling treatment, but in this case we are absolutely flabbergasted.’
In June, the couple’s family said the pair had lost an appeal against their convictions and were unable to attend their appeal hearing.
Friends and family have been fighting to free the couple (Picture: PA)
Mr Bennett said Mr Foreman was on the 68th day of a hunger strike, while his wife was on her 59th.
Their family said a letter asking them to end their hunger strike had not been delivered.
Mr Bennett added: ‘We are asking, with everything we have, for them to be shown mercy and allowed to come home.’
Their family also welcomed the appointment of Conservative former MP and Middle East minister Alistair Burt as the UK’s first envoy for complex consular cases.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) warns all British and British-Iranian nationals not to travel to Iran because of a ‘significant risk of arrest, questioning or detention’.
The government previously described the couple’s 10-year sentences as ‘completely appalling and totally unjustifiable’.
An FCDO spokesperson said the department was ‘urgently following up with the Iranian authorities about the reported increased sentence’.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
European Commission seeks exemptions for EU products from US tariffs
1:00 pm
European Commission seeks exemptions for EU products from US tariffs
Trade Exemptions
The European Commission has submitted a list of EU products worth around €150 billion it seeks to exempt from the 15 percent tariffs imposed under the 2025 trade deal.
The European Commission has submitted a list of EU products worth around €150 billion it seeks to exempt from the 15 percent tariffs imposed under the 2025 trade deal.
Economic Impact
Exempting €150 billion worth of EU exports from US tariffs could significantly enhance trade relations, potentially stabilising a volatile economic environment between the two regions.
Exempting €150 billion worth of EU exports from US tariffs could significantly enhance trade relations, potentially stabilising a volatile economic environment between the two regions.
EU Response
“The products listed are economically meaningful for the EU and face limited availability in the US,” stated EU trade official Matthias Jørgensen to MEPs on Tuesday.
“The products listed are economically meaningful for the EU and face limited availability in the US,” stated EU trade official Matthias Jørgensen to MEPs on Tuesday.
EU pushes US to exempt €150 billion worth of EU goods from Turnberry deal
Published on
The European Commission has given the US a list of EU products which it wants to see exempted from the 15 percent tariffs imposed under the trade deal signed by Brussels and Washington in 2025.
The list, seen by EU News, includes hundreds of products, such as Roquefort cheese, olive oil, wines, spirits and beer, pasta, medical devices, electrical equipment and machinery.
EU trade official Matthias Jørgensen told MEPs on Tuesday that the list covered around €150 billion worth of EU exports.
He also said that the products were either “economically meaningful” for the EU or had a “limited domestic availability in the US”.
In July 2025, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump clinched a deal in Turnberry, Scotland after weeks of trade disputes, under which the Europeans agreed to accept 15 percent US tariffs on EU exports while removing their own tariffs on US industrial goods.
Negotiations on exemptions from the duties were also announced in a joint statement by Brussels and Washington published in August 2025, but the US refused to open talks before the EU reduced its tariffs on US goods.
Since a deal was reached in May by EU legislators and that Brussels removed its duties on 1 July, the European Commission hopes to secure carve-outs from the 15 percent US tariffs.
The joint statement said that the US and the EU would “consider” applying the tariffs that existed before 2025 to products that are “important for their economies and value chains.” Those tariffs averaged around 3.3 percent.
Since 2025, EU countries have been lobbying the Commission – which negotiates on their behalf in trade matters – to secure carve-outs for their main exports to the US.
France, Italy and Spain have been pushing in particular for more favourable tariffs on wine.
The EU also hopes to start discussions on steel and aluminium, which are still subject to 50 percent US tariffs. Jørgensen said he expects talks on those products to be “challenging”.
“The US has made very clear that for national security reasons, this is an area where the it wants to maintain and protect US production,” he told EU lawmakers.
The commissioner also said that despite the Turnberry agreement, trade relations between the EU and the US would remain “at high risk of volatility”, pointing to Trump’s public threats to EU countries who impose a digital tax on US big tech companies.
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.