LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Putin ally advocates for nuclear weapons in vision for Russia’s future

Get you up to speed: Putin mouthpiece considers use of nuclear weapons to be a ‘good’ scenario for Russia | News World

Konstantin Malofeev and Alexander Dugin presented a report outlining a 25-year vision for Russia during the Petersburg International Economic Forum. Their comments included predictions of nuclear weapons use and geopolitical outcomes amidst ongoing sanctions from the UK, US, and EU.

Konstantin Malofeev’s report has been presented to the Ministry of Defence, outlining three potential futures for Russia, including significant military actions. The 29th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, which runs from 3 to 6 June 2026, has revealed a divide in Russian thought regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and its economic ramifications.

Konstantin Malofeev presented a report at the Petersburg International Economic Forum outlining a 25-year vision for Russia that includes potential nuclear actions to secure what he describes as a ‘good’ outcome. Both Malofeev and co-author Alexander Dugin, who have faced sanctions from the UK, US, and EU, indicated that the report has been submitted to the Ministry of Defence.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how the proposed nuclear strategy will align with international relations or the potential repercussions for Russia.

Putin ally advocates for nuclear weapons in vision for Russia’s future

A Putin ally has set out a 25-year vision for Russia that includes using nuclear weapons to secure what he calls a ‘good’ outcome.

Konstantin Malofeev, founder of Orthodox media network Tsargrad, made his comments while presenting a Russia 2050 report at the Petersburg International Economic Forum.

He predicted three possible outcomes:

Good: Russia ‘obtaining a clear image of victory in the ideological war’ using nuclear weapons, annexing major Ukrainian cities including Kyiv, Odesa and Kharkiv, and seeing the European Union fall

Bad: Russia losing the war in Ukraine and being colonised

Status quo: American or Chinese global dominance and Russia potentially using nuclear weapons within the next decade

Malofeev has been a vocal supporter of the annexation of Crimea and funded efforts to destabilise Ukraine, including backing Russia’s 2014 invasion against the country.

He was joined by co-author Alexander Dugin who who said the report had already been presented to the Ministry of Defence.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Both men face sanctions from the UK, US and EU.

In its opening days, the summit, dubbed Putin’s Davos, has highlighted two competing schools of thought in Russia.

Putin ally advocates for nuclear weapons in vision for Russia’s future
Alexander Dugin said the war in Ukraine ‘will end either with Russia’s victory or it will never end’ (Picture: EPA)

Some want the country to continue fighting and prepare for global confrontation with the West. Others have highlighted the economic benefits to be reaped from ending the war.

However, the conference was overshadowed when Ukrainian drones hit an oil terminal and naval base in St Petersburg.

Several prominent figures in Russia have tried in the past to warn Putin about the economic consequences of the war.

Kirill Dmitriev, Russia’s go-between with the Trump administration, has been touting the potential economic benefits of a peace deal.

‘The question is: does this war end or do we stare into a much tougher future?’ one Russian participant told Reuters.

Putin says Moscow does not intend to attack NATO, whose member states’ combined economies dwarf that of Russia, even though it is the world’s biggest supplier of natural resources.

But Mr Dugin, whose daughter Darya was killed in a 2022 car bomb that Moscow blamed on Ukraine, said the war in Ukraine ‘will end either with Russia’s victory or it will never end.’

He said: ‘We need to gather all our strength, gather all of our will and stop pretending that we are a peaceful country that goes off to barbecues or summer vacations.’

Dugin said Russia would not attack the West. But, asked to sum up Russia’s relations with the West in the coming years, he said simply: ‘War.’

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

EU leaders meet Western Balkan states to discuss membership bid progress

EU leaders meet Western Balkan states to discuss membership bid progress

EU summit Today
EU institutional leaders and up to 30 European heads of state will convene in Montenegro for a summit with six Western Balkan leaders to advance their EU membership aspirations.
Strategic Outreach
Today’s summit involves up to 30 European leaders, emphasising EU commitment to engaging the Western Balkans, potentially reshaping geopolitical dynamics and enhancing regional stability.
Official Optimism
“I’m very optimistic about the summit… Montenegro shows that it’s possible to move forward on this enlargement,” stated European Council President António Costa.

Newsletter: Bust to boom? Europe’s most exclusive club might be getting bigger

EU leaders meet Western Balkan states to discuss membership bid progress

Good morning, Brussels. Angela Skujins hereon newsletter duty, helping you ride out the last day of the week. EU enlargement is on the minds of everyone in the Belgian capital — as well as the tiny Montenegrin town of Tivat.

Western Balkans bundle. EU institutional figureheads and up to 30 European heads of state will today meet six Western Balkan leaders for a bi-annual summit aimed at accelerating the countries’ bid to join the 27-member club. EU News’ Europe Editor Maria Tadeo sat down exclusively with the European Council President António Costa on Montenegro’s sun-soaked coast to speak about the event and the symbolism it brings to the Balkan region.

“I’m very optimistic about the summit, first of all, because the landscape is very inspiring,” he said in comments on EU News’ flagship morning news programme Europe Today. Costa, flanked by yachts and the Adriatic Sea, speaks on Thursday from Montenegro, a country widely considered a clear frontrunner, alongside Albania, for joining the EU.

“Montenegro shows that effectively it’s possible to move forward on this enlargement, that the member states want this enlargement and the candidate states want to and can effectively make the necessary reforms to enter in the European Union,” he said. Watch.

Over the last five days, Costa has visited the six Western Balkan partners: Bosnia and Herzegovina; Albania; North Macedonia; Kosovo; Serbia; and finally, Montenegro — the country billing itself as the EU’s 28th member state by 2028.

But not all candidate countries are perfect. Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama has attracted fierce controversy in recent days for approving a Trump family-linked resort on a fragile stretch of coast.

In recent weeks, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has repeatedly defended his relationship with Beijing while castigating Brussels — treading a fine line between what is acceptable from the EU’s security framework perspective, and what is not.

Belgrade has also been under fire for concerns including pressure on the judiciary, restrictions on media freedom, and a crackdown on protests.

The EU-Western Balkan Summit comes at a fortuitous time. In Brussels, 1,800 kilometres away, a seismic shift occurred. On Wednesday, Hungary lifted its veto on Ukraine’s accession process. “Prime Minister (Péter) Magyar announced that he believes that in three weeks they are in (a) condition to release the veto and we can move forward,” Costa said about what is only being described as a breakthrough.

“Fortunately, we didn’t lose time during this period because the Commission and Ukrainian authorities started last year, these negotiations,” he said.

Ukraine lodged its EU accession bid in 2022, the year that Russia launched its full-scale invasion. Kyiv sees its EU membership as a sure-fire way to bolster its defences against the continued war, but the opening of negotiations has been repeatedly stalled due to protestations by the former Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán.

The new government, led by Magyar, has made significant inroads in Kyiv-Budapest relations, most recently by announcing a deal on Hungarian minority rights in Ukraine. “We have reached a comprehensive agreement with Ukraine on the expansion of the linguistic, educational, cultural and political rights of the 100,000-strong Hungarian minority,” Magyar said on Wednesday on a Facebook video.

This deal paved the way for Hungary to drop its veto. In a must-read exclusive story, my colleagues Jorge Liboreiro, Sasha Vakulina, Sándor Zsiros and Luca Bertuzzi take you inside the room and in the minds of the pivotal figures to explain how the tides finally shifted. “All Brussels was waiting for this,” a diplomat said. “It’s unbelievable. It’s good news.”

A different kind of negotiation. The EU’s trade chief Maroš Šefčovič occupies one of the hardest jobs in Brussels, balancing the interests of the bloc with trade relations with Beijing and Washington.

The European Commissioner for Trade will speak at an event sponsored by EU News, the Brussels Economic Security Forum, on Friday in the Belgian capital. The speech comes a day after he met with the US Trade Representative, Ambassador Greer, at the OECD conference in the French capital. Following the meeting, Šefčovič trotted out his usual stump speech: that the EU and the US had reaffirmed their “shared” commitment to “keep moving forward in good faith”.

It came after a surprise announcement from US President Donald Trump on Tuesday that threatened to, once again, rupture relations between the transatlantic allies. The Trump administration proposed imposing additional tariffs of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 economies, including the EU. The announcement was denounced by the Commission.

Šefčovič’s highly-anticipated speech, focussing on mobilising strength for Europe’s security, also comes a day after he met with his Chinese counterpart, Chinese trade envoy Li Chenggang. Following the bilateral, also in Paris, the EU’s trade boss told reporters he will continue trying to speak to the Chinese to resolve what is becoming an “unsustainable” trade deficit.

The EU’s trade deficit with China is ballooning and shows no signs of abating. In the first quarter of 2026, the Commission puts this figure at €98 billion — the highest gap since the previous record was set in 2022 at €107 billion.

On Thursday, in comments to EU News’ Shona Murray, Lithuania’s Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys highlighted that while Russia has forced Europe to rearm, China is exacerbating Europe’s defensive challenges by its chokehold on key minerals needed for European weapons. “China’s dominance of critical raw material supply chains and its willingness to weaponise them already restricts our defence industry,” Budrys said.

Speaking of Moscow. My colleague Vincenzo Genovese has reported that as Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy inch closer to a possible meeting to end the war, the European Union is considering tightening the screws on Ukrainians’ access to temporary protection.

Countries including Poland and Germany are pushing to exclude military-age men from the status, which grants the right to reside and work in the EU until March 2027. At a meeting of EU interior ministers in Luxembourg on Thursday, several options for narrowing the scheme were discussed.

But the proposal gaining the most steam excludes Ukrainian men aged 23 to 60, who are eligible for military service, from receiving the temporary protection. The move would also please Kyiv.

EU sources have told EU News that the Commission should propose something concrete soon.

‘It’s not happening’: EU loses hope in maritime services ban for Russian tankers

Officials and diplomats in Brussels are growing increasingly pessimistic about the chances of enforcing a full ban on maritime services for Russian tankers, as both internal and external factors weigh against the ambitious proposal.

“It’s not happening,” a diplomat bluntly said, according to reporting by Jorge Liboreiro. ​

The ban was approved in late April as part of the 20th package of sanctions to cripple Moscow’s war economy. It is designed to prohibit all maritime-related services, including banking, shipping, flagging and insurance, for tankers carrying Russian oil. Crucially, the far-reaching measure was left on hold sine die.

The official reason for the pause was a desire to reach an agreement at the G7 level following the example of the price cap, which was adopted in conjunction with allies.

“This was the best way to send a signal that we were ready,” another diplomat said. “It was a deliberate choice.”

However, other G7 members have shown little to no enthusiasm in following suit. The United States has moved in the opposite direction by issuing three successive sanctions waivers on Russian oil to cope with the turmoil unleashed by the Strait of Hormuz. Recent moves from the United Kingdom have also raised eyebrows in Brussels.

Although the EU has flat-out refused to ease sanctions, it has delayed a long-awaited proposal to phase out imports of Russian oil. G7 leaders will meet in Evian, France, in mid-June. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has called for stronger sanctions on Russia, is expected to attend.

Publicly, the European Commission, the Baltics and the Nordics continue to push for the services ban to be enforced and raise the material costs for Russia’s energy sector.

But officials and diplomats admit that turmoil in energy markets, coupled with persistently high oil prices, is a powerful deterrent to activating the untested measure, which was unveiled just weeks before the US and Israel launched strikes against Iran.

Read more.

More from our newsrooms

Greenland is part of Denmark ‘for now,’ US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reignited the flame over the US’s continued pursuit of Greenland. While testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday, he was asked by congresswoman Sarah McBride whether he was “aware that Greenland is indeed part of Denmark”. “For now,” Rubio replied. Nathan Rennolds has more on the story.

‘No more shopping weekends’: 11 European countries seek tougher Russian visa rules

Eleven European countries are pressing for tougher visa restrictions on Russian tourists, arguing that holiday travel while the war in Ukraine continues undermines EU solidarity, weakens pressure on Moscow and creates potential security risks. Luca Bertuzzi, Jorge Liboreiro and Vincenzo Genovese have more.

Be less polite: How to cut your AI impact as UN report reveals data centre energy use rivals nations

The environmental footprint of data centres already rivals some of the world’s largest countries, according to a United Nations University report released on 3 June. AI users can reduce the climate impact of their queries for artificial intelligence bots by being less polite and more concise in their queries, one of the report’s authors advises. Angela Barnes looks at the data.

Interviews with European Council President, António Costa, and European Investment Bank President, Nadia Calviño.

We’re also keeping an eye on

  • EU ministers responsible for cohesion will meet for an informal gathering in Lefkosia, Cyprus.
  • EU ministers responsible for justice and home affairs will meet in Luxembourg for a second day of talks, focussing on justice.
  • European Commissioner for Defence Andrius Kubilius will visit the facilities of defence companies Thales and FN in Wallonia, Belgium.

That’s it for today. Jorge Liboreiro and Vincenzo Genovese contributed to this newsletter.

US lawmakers reach tentative agreement to avert government shutdown

US lawmakers reach tentative agreement to avert government shutdown

The Supreme Court is set to hear a pivotal case regarding affirmative action in higher education on October 31, with potentially far-reaching implications for college admissions across the United States. The case, backed by conservative groups, challenges race-conscious admissions policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, arguing that such practices violate the Civil Rights Act. The ruling could reshape the landscape of higher education, impacting how institutions evaluate applicants based on race.

As the Supreme Court prepares for oral arguments, markets reflect growing uncertainty, with education sector stocks experiencing fluctuations. Investors are closely watching how the Court’s decision may influence diversifying methods within educational institutions and its effect on enrollment figures. Markets will remain attuned to shifts in public policy, particularly concerning equity and access in education as the October decision day approaches.

Key developments across the United States

US announces $300 million military aid package for Ukraine

US DEFENSE — The US is providing additional military support to Ukraine amidst ongoing conflict with Russia.

This new $300 million military aid package includes critical supplies such as artillery, drones, and training for Ukrainian forces. The US continues to strengthen its commitment to Ukraine’s defense capabilities in response to the escalating war in Eastern Europe.

Biden administration pushes for stricter gun control measures

US LAW — The Biden administration is advancing new initiatives aimed at tightening gun control laws in the United States.

US economy shows signs of slowing growth

US ECONOMY — Recent reports indicate a potential deceleration in economic growth in the United States.

Analysts highlight key factors such as inflation pressures and decreased consumer spending as contributors to this slowdown. These trends raise concerns over the sustainability of the economic recovery as the Federal Reserve monitors conditions closely.

US sanctions targeted at Iranian oil exports

US SANCTIONS — The US has imposed new sanctions aimed at curbing Iranian oil exports.

This move aligns with ongoing efforts to address concerns over Iran‘s nuclear program and regional stability. The sanctions are expected to have a significant impact on Iran’s economy and its ability to finance military activities.

What to watch — The Biden administration’s next steps on gun control legislation will be closely monitored as public sentiment evolves.

Further reading from US News sources

Reuters
Title from Reuters

Associated Press
Title from Associated Press

Bloomberg
Title from Bloomberg

The Wall Street Journal
Title from The Wall Street Journal

The New York Times
Title from The New York Times

Mogadishu clashes exacerbate Somalia’s ongoing political crisis

Get you up to speed: Why Mogadishu clashes are deepening Somalia’s political crisis again

Fighting erupted in Mogadishu between government forces and opposition figures, including former Prime Ministers Hassan Ali Khaire and Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, over planned protests against President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s term extension. The clashes, which began in the Hawl Wadaag district, caused significant disruption, with hundreds of families fleeing affected areas and major roads being sealed off.

Security forces have sealed off Maka al-Mukarama Road and closed Bakara market, affecting daily commerce and movement in the city. The conflict has resulted in significant displacement, with hundreds of families fleeing affected areas while the direct economic impact is projected at $3.8 million, according to Ali Wardheere, the deputy central bank governor.

The Somali government condemned the planned protests led by opposition figures, claiming they would exacerbate security issues in Mogadishu, while the Ministry of Information accused the opposition of obstructing citizens’ electoral rights. In response to the violence, security forces have secured key roads and areas of the city, signalling a firm stance as both sides prepare for potential continued unrest.

What remains unclear — The exact implications of the constitutional amendment on Somalia’s electoral framework and how it will address the ongoing political divide are yet to be detailed.

Mogadishu clashes exacerbate Somalia’s ongoing political crisis

News|ConflictWhy Mogadishu clashes are deepening Somalia’s political crisis again

Tensions over Somali elections escalate into violence, leaving Mogadishu residents grappling with fear and disruption.

Somalia's capital, MogadishuSomalia’s capital has ground to a near standstill as fighting has erupted between opposition and government forces [Faisal Ali/WTX News]

Mogadishu, Somalia – Mustafa, 33, dreads election time in Somalia. He drives a bajaj — a three-wheeled taxi — and says that when tensions rise, as they always do when polls are near, the whole city feels it, and drivers like him are among the first.

On Wednesday, he was passing through the Hawl Wadaag district when heavy gunfire between government and opposition forces erupted all around him.

list of 2 itemslist 1 of 2Gunfire erupts in Mogadishu before protests against Somali president’s rulelist 2 of 2Fighting in Somalia’s capital as anger over election delay eruptsend of list

“I couldn’t even think. Everyone was shouting and running for their lives, and we all fled from the bullets,” he told WTX News. “We haven’t seen fighting this bad in years.”

The shooting that began that afternoon around the homes of former Prime Minister Hassan Ali Khaire and, later, former President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, came as opposition figures were planning to organise protests against what they describe as an illegal term extension by incumbent President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.

Khaire and Sharif Sheikh Ahmed were among opposition leaders spreadheading the planned protests amid rising tensions with the federal government.

The government said the planned protests would undermine security in a city still grappling with persistent armed violence.

Hundreds of families fled neighbourhoods near the fighting, and by the next day, many of the capital’s central areas had emptied. The sudden eruption of violence ended a period of improving security in Mogadishu, shattering the perception that the city had begun turning a corner.

“The most frustrating thing is that we have nothing to do with it, and it impacts so many of us,” Mustafa said. “We make our living in this city”.

Security forces sealed Maka al-Mukarama Road, one of Mogadishu’s main arteries, while Bakara market, the largest commercial hub in the city, was effectively closed for business.

Maka Al-Mukarama Road, Mogadishu’s main thoroughfare, is usually a bustling commercial hub.Maka al-Mukarama Road, Mogadishu’s main thoroughfare, is usually a bustling commercial hub, but recently, it has been largely empty, with the exception of military vehicles [Faisal Ali/WTX News]

“Look, it’s midday, and there’s almost no one here, shops are closed, and usually by this time the place is jammed,” Ahmed, a street vendor at Bakara market, told WTX News, gesturing at shuttered stalls.

Ali Wardheere, the deputy central bank governor, estimated the direct cost to businesses and services at $3.8m, though he stressed the figure was a model-based projection, not an official or final tally.

Like most Somalis, Mustafa has never voted for a president or a member of parliament. The country has not held a direct election for national leadership since the late 1960s.

Since the state was re-established in 2012 after its 1991 collapse, leaders have been selected through an indirect system negotiated by clan elders and political elites.

As presidential terms near their end, low trust among political actors often leads to intense competition over power — and at times violence — as disputes over the electoral timetable come to a head.

At a press conference in late May, Sharif warned that the political deadlock could turn violent if negotiations failed.

“Where do things stand? [We say] Leave, and [you say] I won’t leave. What comes next? Bullets.”

The warning echoed events in 2021, when then-President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo remained in office more than a year beyond the end of his term, triggering clashes in Mogadishu before a political agreement was reached.

Higher stakes this election

This time, the political standoff carries higher stakes.

President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud says that constitutional amendments approved by parliament extended his mandate by an additional year from May 15. The opposition rejects that and has begun referring to him as a “former president”.

Two of Somalia’s most influential federal states also reject the amendments, leaving the country divided over the constitutional framework governing the next election, with no constitutional court to resolve the dispute.

After parliament approved the changes, Mohamud declared that the “provisional constitution, and the provisional era, was a sun which set yesterday,” signalling that his administration would press ahead despite objections from its opponents.

Tensions had been building for days. Ahead of a protest planned for Thursday, opposition leaders left the heavily fortified “green zone” near Mogadishu’s airport and returned to their residences across the city.

Some opposition figures said they would deploy their own armed guards at the demonstration, a proposal Mohamud rejected. The dispute heightened fears of a confrontation before fighting eventually broke out.

Both sides blame the other for starting the clashes. Khaire accused Mohamud of directing a “sustained and indiscriminate military assault” that lasted more than 20 hours, a claim Sharif echoed after fighting reached his own residence.

Ahmed Moalim Fiqi, the defence minister, accused the opposition of militarising the standoff, likening it to Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces and alleging that opposition figures had “distributed mortars and artillery across the capital”.

“Force and militias,” he said, would no longer be allowed to “seize power or block the state.”

How it came to this

The roots of the crisis run back to the 2012 provisional constitution, which set up a federal, parliamentary system built on broad consensus and clan-based power-sharing, which every government since has promised to achieve and failed to attain.

This year, after a long review, parliament amended the constitution through a disputed process that split the political class. The government has insisted that the new constitution advances the statebuilding process and that the Somali public should be allowed to directly elect its representatives.

For Ahmed Abdi Koshin, a federal MP who boycotted the draft, the danger is that the whole settlement comes apart. The process, he said, “clearly doesn’t have buy-in,” and the original constitution, for all its faults — “an imperfect product of compromise” — was the “only glue holding Somalia together”.

Koshin is not against a direct vote in principle, he said, but does not believe the country is ready for one. “We don’t have legislation for a direct vote; censuses and the security situation remains compromised. It really is up to the president to either reach a deal and save Somalia, or watch it fall apart,” he said.

The opposition, organised as a coalition known as the Somali Future Council and including two serving federal-state presidents, former prime ministers and a former president, has pressed Mohamud to accept that his mandate has ended and negotiate a new electoral framework, as in past transitions.

It alleges that his push for a direct vote is a pretext for extending his term and potentially securing another.

The government rejects that, casting a national one-person, one-vote election — the first since the 1960s — as essential to a drawn-out state-building project. When electoral talks collapsed on May 15, the Ministry of Information accused the opposition of bringing demands that ran counter to “the citizen’s fundamental right to vote and to be voted for”, and vowed to press ahead.

Mohamed Ibrahim Moalimuu, a lower-house MP who backed the amendments, said further delay could not be justified. “We’ve waited for more than 12 years,” he told WTX News.

“If they had arguments against them, they should have taken part in the process and raised their issues. A constitution isn’t a Quran, and they should come back and work through parliament to make their views clear.”

A whole generation of Somalis, he noted, have never cast a ballot, and a real election “would be a major milestone and would bring some hope”.

The old indirect system, he added, was notoriously corrupt, with parliamentary seats changing hands for anywhere from $100,000 to as much as $1.3m. “This system is too dirty and keeps people out,” said Maliumuu. “It needs to be changed.”

A deeper problem

A regional official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to talk to the media, described an elite “divided strategically over what type of country they want, whether a strong centralised state or a weak decentralised one, and tactically over who the right candidate is to take them there”.

Mohamud, the official said, had moved from a decentralised vision for Somalia that embraces federalism towards a stronger executive, and his early, promising relationships with the federal-state leaders had since soured.

Those fractures have opened on several fronts at once.

Somaliland, which declared independence in 1991 and has stayed out of the constitutional review entirely, was recognised by Israel late last year after earlier courting Ethiopia.

Puntland and Jubaland, two of Somalia’s six federal states, have withdrawn from the federal system over the new constitution, while more than 100 MPs and senators from both boycotted the final vote.

Broader regional crises, from Sudan’s civil war to disease outbreaks elsewhere on the continent, have pushed Somalia further down the list of international priorities, leaving international engagement more fragmented and inconsistent.

The country is also grappling with a deepening humanitarian crisis and aid cuts, prompting famine monitors to warn of a heightened risk of hunger in parts of Somalia.

Yusuf Aynte, a veteran religious leader and former MP, said Somalia’s leaders needed to build consensus rather than push through changes that risk deepening divisions.

“The president says what he is doing is good, and that may be so,” he told WTX News. “But the most important thing is what everyone can agree on.

“At the moment, Somalia has too many problems, and can’t afford to be distracted like this.”

Jamal Shiil, a youth activist, told WTX News that Somalia’s large youth population would ultimately bear the cost of the persistent instability.

“Young people want to make a living here, for Somalia to be peaceful and not to have to leave because of the problems,” he said. “But if things don’t change it won’t leave them much of a choice”.

High-water levels to raise Saskatoon waterline by over half a metre

Get you up to speed: Incoming high-water levels to raise Saskatoon waterline by over half a meter

High water levels in the South Saskatchewan River are prompting some water sport groups to adjust their activities, while others are taking advantage of the increased water. Officials have issued warnings about potential dangers associated with the rising waters.

Officials have noted that the rising water levels in the South Saskatchewan River have led to increased risks for water sports activities. Safety advisories have been issued, but no timeline has been provided regarding the expected peak or subsequent drop in water levels.

Officials have cautioned that rising water levels in the South Sask. River could pose dangers, prompting some water sports groups to adapt their activities. As conditions change, authorities are expected to monitor the situation closely and issue further safety guidelines as necessary.

What remains unclear — It is not specified what specific dangers the high water levels pose to the public.

High-water levels to raise Saskatoon waterline by over half a metre

Water levels to rise
With high waters coming to the South Sask. River, some water sport groups are being forced to make a change while others benefit from the rise. Officials warn it may be dangerous.

House approves new Ukraine aid package as several Republicans join Democrats

Get you up to speed: House approves new Ukraine aid as over a dozen Republicans defect

The House approved a measure to provide up to $8 billion in military loans and reconstruction assistance to Ukraine, supported by a coalition of Democrats and several Republicans. The legislation passed with a vote of 226 to 195 after a procedural discharge petition was successfully launched by Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York.

The House’s legislation, which passed with a vote of 226 to 195, authorises up to £8 billion in military loans for Ukraine and includes provisions for post-war reconstruction and new sanctions targeting Russia. The bill’s trajectory in the Senate remains uncertain, especially as bipartisan legislation imposing further economic sanctions on Russia has been stalled for over a year.

The House’s approval of up to $8 billion in military loans for Ukraine follows Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks’ year-long effort using a discharge petition, now supported by both parties. The bill’s future in the Senate remains uncertain, with Republican Rep. Don Bacon expressing hope that it will prompt action among senators regarding new economic sanctions on Russia.

What remains unclear — The fate of the House bill in the Senate is uncertain.

House approves new Ukraine aid package as several Republicans join Democrats

Washington — The House approved an effort on Thursday to send fresh assistance to Ukraine after a few Republican members joined with Democrats to force a vote on the issue. 

The procedural tactic, known as a discharge petition, was launched by Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York nearly a year ago. A discharge petition allows a majority of House members to bring a bill to the floor.

It had amassed most of the signatures it needed to force a floor vote months ago, but was one name short until May 13 when Rep. Kevin Kiley of California, an independent who caucuses with Republicans, was the decisive 218th signature. Every Democrat and two Republicans — Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania — also signed the petition. 

In a key vote Wednesday to discharge the measure from the House Rules Committee, half a dozen Republicans voted with Democrats to propel it toward a final passage vote. 

The underlying legislation, also introduced by Meeks, who is the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, passed in a 226 to 195 vote. More than a dozen Republicans supported it. Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, who signed the petition, voted against it. 

The legislation would authorize up to $8 billion in military loans for Ukraine. It also includes assistance for post-war reconstruction in Ukraine and new sanctions targeting Russia while reaffirming the importance of NATO. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has pleaded for more support from the U.S. as Russia intensifies attacks on Ukraine. Last week, Zelenskyy sent a letter to President Trump and Congress requesting additional Patriot ballistic missile interceptors.

In a news conference shortly after the vote, Meeks said the bill “works to end one of the world’s deadliest conflicts by ensuring Ukraine is able to negotiate from a position of strength and not weakness.”

The House’s effort to circumvent leadership on support for Ukraine comes as bipartisan legislation in the Senate to impose new economic sanctions on Russia has languished for more than a year, with senators waiting for a green light from the White House. The fate of the House bill is uncertain in the Senate.

Bacon said he’s hopeful that Thursday’s vote will “shake up the Senate.”

“I don’t know if they’ll pass this bill, but they’re going to now know that we could pass something,” he said.

LIVE German 2025 Election