- Trump criticises Iran’s ceasefire proposal as ‘totally unacceptable’ amid tensions
- Pope Leo XIV marks first anniversary with call for peace and unity
- Trump rejects Iran’s response to US ceasefire proposal as unacceptable
- Frontier Airlines flight hits trespasser at Denver airport, leading to evacuation
- Nika Kovač launches “My Voice, My Choice” for abortion access in EU
- Putin signals potential end to Ukraine war following Victory Day parade
- Thousands celebrate Europe Day in Budapest after new prime minister sworn in
- New technology may safeguard public buildings against terrorist threats – find out how | News UK
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Trump criticises Iran’s ceasefire proposal as ‘totally unacceptable’ amid tensions
Get you up to speed: Trump criticises Iran‘s ceasefire proposal as ‘totally unacceptable’ amid tensions
Donald Trump described Iran’s ceasefire offer as “TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE” on Truth Social. The US struck two Iranian oil tankers that were reportedly attempting to breach a blockade.
Donald Trump reacted to Iran’s ceasefire offer by declaring it “TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE” on Truth Social, expressing frustration over Tehran’s longstanding dealings with the United States. U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, stated that Trump is committed to giving diplomacy “every chance we possibly can before going back to hostilities.”
Donald Trump has stated that he wants to take action against Iran if they do not agree to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and roll back their nuclear programme. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu echoed this sentiment, noting that the war continues until the enriched uranium is removed from Iran.
Donald Trump calls Iran’s ceasefire offer ‘completely unacceptable’ | News US
Washington, DC, USA, 08 May 2026. EPA/Aaron Schwartz / POOL” decoding=”sync”/>
Donald Trump is not happy with Iran’s ceasefire offer (Picture: EPA)
Donald Trump has blasted Iran for making an ‘unacceptable’ ceasefire offer, with fears the Middle East could be plunged back into war.
Washington’s latest proposal addressed a deal to end the war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and roll back Iran’s nuclear program.
Iran has sent their offer to end the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and to ensure the security of global shipping.
But the US president posted on Truth Social: ‘I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called “Representatives.”
‘I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE! Thank you for your attention to this matter.’
Without giving more details, he accused Tehran of ‘playing games’ with the United States for nearly 50 years, adding: ‘They will be laughing no longer!’
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Trump is giving diplomacy ‘every chance we possibly can before going back to hostilities,’ the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, told ABC earlier.
Trump has reiterated threats to resume full-scale bombing if Iran does not accept an agreement to reopen the strait and roll back its nuclear program. Iran has largely blocked the strategic waterway that’s key to the global flow of oil.
On Friday, the US struck two Iranian oil tankers it said were trying to breach the blockade.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard navy promised a heavy assault on US bases in retaliation.
Another sticking point in negotiations is Iran’s highly enriched uranium. The UN nuclear agency says Iran has more than 440 kilograms (970 pounds) enriched up to 60% purity, a short, technical step from weapons grade.
‘We considered it possible that they might intend to steal it through infiltration operations or heli-borne operations,’ General Akrami Nia said.
Israel-Lebanon border as seen from the Israeli side of the border, May 10, 2026. REUTERS/Ayal Margolin ISRAEL OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN ISRAEL TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY” decoding=”async” loading=”lazy”/>
An explosion of what appears to be white phosphorus fired by the IDF on Lebanon on May 10,
(Picture: Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the war isn’t over because the enriched uranium needs to be taken out of Iran. ‘Trump has said to me, “I want to go in there,” and I think it can be done physically,’ he said.
It came after Trump fired off 16 posts on Truth Social, featuring AI images of ships sinking in Iran and mock-ups of renovations in Washington.
The US President went on one of his infamous posting sprees to share images of sinking ships in Iran, explosions and a UFC fight on the White House front lawn.
In one image, captioned ‘Bye Bye, Drones’, an AI image showed an American warship blasting Iranian drones out of the sky with lasers.
Another showed Iranian drones dropping like butterflies into the ocean, with images of actual blue butterflies next to it.

In one image, Trump watched as ships exploded in the distance (Picture: Truth Social)
It appears the President got the phrase ‘dropping like flies’ mixed up with butterflies.
Other posts showed AI mockups of a UFC fighting stage on the White House lawn, which Trump plans to host for America’s 250th this year.
Trump also took a dig at his predecessor Barack Obama.
He wrote: ‘[Iran] finally found the greatest SUCKER of them all, in the form of a weak and stupid American President.
‘He was a disaster as our “Leader,” but not as bad as Sleepy Joe Biden! For 47 years the Iranians have been “tapping” us along, keeping us waiting, killing our people with their roadside bombs, destroying protests, and recently wiping out 42,000 innocent, unarmed protestors, and laughing at our now GREAT AGAIN Country.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Pope Leo XIV marks first anniversary with call for peace and unity
Pope Leo XIV marks first anniversary with call for peace and unity
On the first anniversary of his papacy, Pope Leo XIV celebrated a Mass in Pompeii, addressing themes of peace amid ongoing global conflicts.
Pope Leo XIV’s blend of conservative concessions and a call for spiritual and diplomatic peace indicates a pivotal effort to stabilise the Church amid global tensions.
“In this first year, marked by wars, tensions and divisive rhetoric, His voice has called everyone to the responsibility of peace,” stated the Italian Episcopal Conference.
Key developments
Pope Leo XIV marked his first anniversary by gathering with communities in Pompeii and Naples, emphasising a renewed commitment to peace amid ongoing global conflicts and urging spiritual responsibility.
In his homily, he called for mercy to overcome grudges and hatred, highlighting the necessity for peace-building at all levels, including economic, political, and spiritual realms.
Leo XIV, Pope’s anniversary in Pompeii and Naples: ‘We cannot resign ourselves to death’

One year ago, Robert Francis Prevost emerged from the conclave as Leo XIV with the aim and the hope of his electors to find a balance between his two predecessors, the conservative Benedict XVI and the revolutionary Francis.
The Pope spent spent this anniversary with the communities of Pompeii and Naples, where he met volunteers and disadvantaged young people and then thousands of faithful, to whom he addressed a message not unrelated to the international current events of these times.
“May there come from the God of peace a superabundant outpouring of mercy, which touches hearts, appeases grudges and fratricidal hatred and enlightens those who bear governmental responsibilities,” he said on Friday in the homily of the Mass celebrated in the square in Pompei.
“The wars still being fought in so many regions of the world call for a renewed commitment not only at the economic and political levels, but also at the spiritual and religious ones. Peace is born within the heart,” Pope Leo invoked, “we cannot resign ourselves to the images of death that the chronicles propose to us every day.”
In closing, before moving on to Naples, where some thirty thousand people awaited him in Piazza Plebiscito, he warned that “many call themselves Christians but offend God.”
The 70-year-old pope from Chicago, the first in history to come from the United States, probably imagined a turbulent relationship with Donald Trump’s White House, but perhaps not to find himself on 8 May 2026 in the midst of another war in the Middle East and Trump’s fierce offensive against the Holy See, which prompted a tepid reparatory meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday.
The call for an “unarmed and disarming, humble and persevering peace” twelve months ago from the central loggia of St. Peter’s has for now been drowned out by the bombings by Israel, the United States, Iran and Russia, but the Augustinian missionary’s original mission remains.
The ‘Pax Leonina’: a return to the Vatican tradition but with the politics of Francis
In the search for Pope Francis’s successor, electors wanted a stable leader who could manage the Church’s internal conflicts.
Cardinal Prevost was not initially considered a favourite, but he became a key compromise choice. Since he was in charge of appointing bishops worldwide, most cardinals in the Sistine Chapel already knew and trusted him.
Pope Leo made immediate concessions to the conservative wing of the Church, particularly its influential base in the United States. He appeared as pope wearing traditional vestments, a sharp contrast to his predecessor, who had famously swapped formal robes for a simple white cassock.
He decided to reopen the papal flats in the Apostolic Palace, letting the floor of Casa Santa Marta, where Francis had lived, return to its function as guest quarters.
The new Pope also acknowledged the Curia as ‘the memory of the Church,’ noting that while ‘popes pass away,’ the institution remains. He even allowed the ultra-conservative US Cardinal Raymond Burke – ostracized for years due to his demands for a return to traditional liturgy – to celebrate a Latin Mass at St. Peter’s in October 2025.
The rest of his work focused on rebuilding balance and hierarchy without seeking the spotlight, except when necessary. This was seen in his sharp responses to Donald Trump, who had accused him of weakness on foreign policy and the Iranian nuclear issue, claiming his stance would put “many Catholics in danger”.
The Pope’s calm detachment, reflected in statements such as ‘I am not afraid of the Trump administration’ and ‘I am not a politician,’ has been part of an anti-war message repeated since day one.
“In this first year, marked by wars, tensions and divisive rhetoric,” the Italian Episcopal Conference(Cei) emphasised in a message of good wishes to the Pontiff, “His voice has called everyone to the responsibility of peace: not as an abstract formula, but as an evangelical requirement and daily task, a way of truth, justice and dialogue.”
“Let us thank God for the gift of Pope Leo”, “a meek man who speaks of love and unity”, wrote Matteo Maria Zuppi, president of Cei and one of the main cardinals in the Conclave, on Friday in the daily Avvenire , quoting the Pontiff: “We must seek together a missionary church, which builds bridges and dialogue, always open to welcoming others”.
On some issues, in fact, the mathematician by training and former Prior General of the Augustinian order has sought collegiality, recovering the consultative instrument of the bishops’ consistories, which were rarely used in the previous decade, while on others he has traced Francis’ Jesuit third-worldism.
As for finances, Pope Leo made the limits of the IOR (the Institute for Religious Works, the Vatican bank, at the centre of numerous scandals in the past) very clear early on, removing from it exclusive authority over the management of the Holy See’s Patrimony, entrusting it to the Curia bodies.
The main stages of Leo XIV’s first year as Pope
Prevost has so far marked the papacy by a studied protocol, with some concessions to his past, such as the visit to the Shrine of the Mother of Good Counsel, run by the Augustinians in Genazzano on the outskirts of Rome, and to the General House of the order close to St. Peter’s, in the days following his election.
The solemn mass at the beginning of the Pontificate on 18 May in St. Peter’s Square and the first general audience three days later began a period of adjustment that ended with the first apostolic journey the following autumn.
The visit to Turkey and Lebanon from 27 November to 2 December 2025, already planned by his predecessor for the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, reaffirmed the message of ecumenical unity with the other Christian denominations.
Just before Christmas, came the appointment of Ronald A. Hicks as Archbishop of New York, following the resignation of Timothy Dolan, a 59-year-old progressive in place of the champion of US Identitarian Catholicism.
Pope Leo inaugurated 2026 by closing the Holy Door in St Peter’s Basilica and tbringing the Jubilee Year to a close on 6 January.
In March the first three appointments of weight, after the confirmation of Cardinal Pietro Parolin at the Secretariat of State: Archbishop Paolo Rudelli as Substitute for General Affairs at the Secretariat of State, the Vatican’s ‘Ministry of the Interior’; the transfer of Venezuelan Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra to the nunciature to Italy and San Marino and that of Petar Rajič to the Prefecture of the Papal Household which manages the Pope’s agenda.
The long trip to Africa from 13 to 23 April- between Algeria, Cameroon, Angola and Equatorial Guinea – instead set Pope Leo’s first real apostolic signature abroad, after a brief visit to the Principality of Monaco.
In another significant moment, on 27 April the Pope received the Archbishop of Canterbury, Sara Mullally, the first woman to lead the Church of England in its 1,400-year history and the highest spiritual authority of the Anglican Church, at the Vatican.
What awaits Leo XIV now are the apostolic journey to Spain between Madrid, Barcelona and the Canary Islands (6-12 June) and the pastoral visit to Lampedusa on 4 July.
Trump rejects Iran’s response to US ceasefire proposal as unacceptable
Media Lens: Trump rejects Iran’s response to US ceasefire proposal as unacceptable
Iran responds to US ceasefire proposal; Trump rejects it.
Iran has responded to a US ceasefire proposal, which was described by President Trump as ‘unacceptable.’ This response is part of ongoing discussions regarding US and Iranian relations, according to coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.
What happened
Iran has responded to a U.S. proposal for a ceasefire, while former President Donald Trump has deemed the response “unacceptable.” Recent updates indicate that tensions between the two nations remain high amidst ongoing discussions.
Reports from various news outlets, including AP News and CNN, highlight the complexity of the diplomatic situation. The U.S. continues to navigate the challenges posed by Iran’s stance in the peace talks.
Key facts
- Iran has responded to a US ceasefire proposal.
- Former President Trump has rejected Iran’s response, calling it ‘unacceptable.’
- The proposals and responses are part of ongoing discussions regarding peace and conflict resolution.
- Different news outlets reported on the interactions between Iran and the US, highlighting differing perspectives.
Where coverage differs
- Outlet A emphasizes Trump’s rejection of Iran’s response, while Outlet B emphasizes Iran’s assertion of its response to the US proposal.
- Outlet C foregrounds Iran’s perspective rather than the US stance.
- Outlet D prioritizes the implications of the ceasefire proposal over the immediate reactions from either side.
One story, four angles
AP News – Iran responds to US ceasefire proposal but Trump rejects it as ‘unacceptable’
Publication: AP News | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: critical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: mixed | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article highlights the tensions surrounding a recent ceasefire proposal from the U.S. to Iran, emphasizing Trump’s strong rejection of it. The piece stresses Iran’s diplomatic efforts while illustrating the U.S. administration’s position against these moves.
Publication emphasis: The main focus is on the U.S. administration’s rejection of Iran’s ceasefire response, framing it as politically problematic.
Framing analysis: The article foregrounds Trump’s rejection and the political ramifications, while Iran’s perspective on the proposal remains secondary.
Bias: Selection: Emphasizes Trump’s critical comments; Language: Use of “unacceptable” denotes strong disapproval; Omission: Less detail on Iran’s diplomatic intentions.
Assessment: AP News presents a politically charged overview that underscores growing tensions between the two nations.
CNN – Live updates: Iran says it has responded to US proposal for ending war
Publication: CNN | Primary framing pattern: policy | Tone: informative | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: This live update covers Iran’s formal response to the U.S. ceasefire proposal, detailing both sides’ stances. CNN seeks to provide a continuous flow of information, balancing reactions from both Iran and U.S. officials.
Publication emphasis: The article emphasizes Iran’s diplomatic attempts and how they relate to ongoing conflict resolutions.
Framing analysis: CNN foregrounds Iran’s perspective and its attempts to negotiate while also presenting the U.S. stance, framing the issue primarily as a policy debate.
Bias: Selection: Focus on statements from both nations; Language: Neutral terminology is used; Omission: Details on possible repercussions are less emphasized.
Assessment: CNN provides a balanced timeline of events that focuses on the evolving diplomatic situation.
NPR – Trump rejects Iran’s latest response to U.S. ceasefire proposal
Publication: NPR | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: critical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: NPR’s report addresses Trump’s outright dismissal of Iran’s response to a U.S. ceasefire proposal, highlighting the potential consequences for diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the implications of Trump’s rejection, exploring how it affects future negotiations.
Framing analysis: NPR emphasizes the negative consequences of the rejection for U.S.-Iran relations, portraying it as a setback in diplomacy.
Bias: Selection: Concentrates on Trump’s remarks; Language: Phrases like “outright dismissal” imply a critical viewpoint; Omission: Less emphasis on alternative viewpoints from Iran.
Assessment: NPR articulates the potential diplomatic setbacks resulting from the rejection of Iran’s response.
The New York Times – Trump Administration Live Updates: President Calls Iran’s Response to Peace Proposal ‘Unacceptable’
Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: challenging | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The New York Times reports on Trump’s characterization of Iran’s response to a U.S. peace proposal, emphasizing the strong language used and its political implications.
Publication emphasis: The article highlights Trump’s use of “unacceptable,” indicating a significant political stance that could spark further conflict.
Framing analysis: The primary focus is on the political ramifications of Trump’s rejection, while Iran’s diplomatic posture is mentioned but secondary.
Bias: Selection: Highlights Trump’s words; Language: Emphasis on harsh critique; Omission: Less focus on the broader implications for U.S.-Iran relations.
Assessment: The New York Times delivers a critical analysis emphasizing political fallout from the ceasefire rejection.
Food for thought
AP News presents the strongest legal framing by detailing Iran’s explicit rejection of the U.S. ceasefire proposal while underscoring Trump’s categorization of it as “unacceptable.” In contrast, CNN embraces a more escalatory perspective, emphasizing the urgency of the geopolitical tensions as both nations navigate responses to the ongoing conflict. NPR primarily focuses on the fallout from Trump’s dismissal of Iran’s response, reflecting an unsettling atmosphere of diplomatic tension. The New York Times further escalates this tone by labeling Iran’s actions as defiant, raising skepticism about future negotiations. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Frontier Airlines flight hits trespasser at Denver airport, leading to evacuation
Get you up to speed: Frontier Airlines flight hits trespasser at Denver airport, leading to evacuation
A trespasser died after being struck by a Frontier Airlines plane at Denver International Airport as it prepared for takeoff. The pilot reported hitting an individual walking across the runway, leading to an engine fire and the evacuation of 224 passengers and seven crew members aboard Flight 4345.
The National Transportation Safety Board is conducting an investigation into the incident at Denver International Airport, where a trespasser was killed by a Frontier Airlines plane preparing for takeoff, according to airport authorities. Frontier Airlines stated that the collision involved only one person and that the takeoff was aborted after smoke was reported in the cabin.
The National Transportation Safety Board has launched an investigation into the incident involving Frontier Airlines Flight 4345 and temporarily closed runway 17L, which reopened at approximately 11am the following day. Frontier Airlines stated that they are investigating the incident in coordination with the airport and other safety authorities.
Trespasser killed after ‘being sucked into plane engine’ on runway | News World
A trespasser died after he was sucked into a plane’s engine as it prepared to take off, airport authorities said.
The unidentified person reportedly jumped the fence at Denver International Airport in Colorado and was hit and killed by the Frontier Airlines plane within two minutes.
The collision, which happened as Flight 4345 prepared to depart for Los Angeles International Airport, sparked an engine fire and forced passengers to evacuate the plane.
As the incident unfolded, the plane’s pilot told the airport’s control tower ‘we’re stopping on the runway’ because they had ‘just hit somebody’ which had caused ‘an engine fire’, according to the site ATC.com.
The pilot then explained that there were 224 passengers and seven crew aboard the plane and that the individual was ‘walking across the runway’ when they were hit.
In response, the air traffic controller said the airport is ‘rolling the trucks now’ before the pilot explained that smoke had entered the aircraft and they are going to ‘evacuate on the runway’.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Part of this evacuation was caught on mobile phone footage and showed people getting their bags, some of whom are wearing masks, as they prepare to exit the plane.
Later shots showed numerous passengers outside the plane while others descended from the plane down inflatable slides.

Footage from inside the plane shows people trying to get out (Picture: CNN)
Children can be seen in the background as a member of staff tells the passengers that they ‘need to all move away from the aircraft’.
In a statement released afterwards, Frontier Airlines said the collision only involved one person and the takeoff was aborted after smoke was reported in the cabin.
It remains unclear if the smoke was linked to the collision.
‘We are investigating this incident and gathering more information in coordination with the airport and other safety authorities,’ the statement added.
After being safely evacuated from the plane via slides, passengers were bused to the terminal.
An airport spokesperson said 12 passengers suffered minor injuries and five were taken to hospital.
‘As we were lifting off the engine of the plane exploded. There was so much smoke we couldn’t even see 1 ft in front of us,’ Jacob said as he recorded the footage.

A figure is seen as the plane prepares to take off (Picture: CNN)
He explained that spent over an hour on the runway without ‘transport or help with the cold’.
The National Transportation Safety Board launched an investigation and temporarily closed runway 17L, where the incident took place.
It reopened at around 11am yesterday.
The incident came a day after a Delta Air Lines employee was killed while on the job at the Orlando International Airport.
In a statement, the airline said the employee was killed on Thursday night without providing further details.
‘We are focused on extending our full support to family and taking care of our Orlando team during this difficult time,’ the airline said.
‘We are working with local authorities as a full investigation gets underway to determine what occurred.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Nika Kovač launches “My Voice, My Choice” for abortion access in EU
Nika Kovač launches “My Voice, My Choice” for abortion access in EU
Nika Kovač and her institute “8 March” launched the European Citizens’ Initiative “My Voice, My Choice” to improve access to abortion across Europe, submitting 1,124,513 signatures in September 2025.
“My Voice, My Choice” is one of only twelve successful European Citizens’ Initiatives since its inception, reflecting its potential to significantly influence EU public health policy.
“It is vital that we have a voice, that we help shape democracy,” said ECI Ambassador Nino Kavelashvili, emphasising the importance of participation in the EU’s democratic process.
Key developments
Nika Kovač’s initiative “My Voice, My Choice” aims to enhance abortion access across Europe. It was presented to the European Parliament in December 2025, marking a significant advancement for reproductive rights.
Following the initiative’s submission of over 1.1 million signatures in September 2025, the European Parliament called for the establishment of a voluntary funding mechanism to assist member states with limited abortion access.
The EU Commission is obliged to respond to the initiative, although it is not required to propose legislation. This response aims to elevate discussions on sexual and reproductive health within the EU agenda.
Can European Citizens’ Initiatives push Brussels to act and bring change?

She was Slovenia’s Woman of the Year 2021, and a few years later, she is also entering the European stage: anthropologist Nika Kovač and her institute “8 March” are at the start of the European Citizens’ Initiative “My Voice, My Choice”.
The initiative to improve access to abortion across Europe was presented to the European Parliament in December 2025, and the Commission decided on follow-up measures in March 2026. It is one of twelve European Citizens’ Initiatives that have managed to change the agenda in the EU Parliament.
This is because the “lack of access to abortion in many parts of Europe not only poses a risk to women’s physical health,” as stated in the citizens’ initiative’s motion, “but also places additional economic and mental burdens on women and families – often in marginalised groups who can least afford it”.
In December, the Parliament called on the Commission to set up a voluntary funding mechanism that all Member States can participate in and is supported by EU funding from the European Social Fund+.
The aim is to help people from countries with limited access to legal abortions: Other EU states should be able to provide them with safe and legal abortions, within the framework of their respective national laws.
There have only been twelve EU citizens’ initiatives so far
“In the case of the My Voice, My Choice initiative, for example, the result was that the EU recognised this issue as an important public health issue,” explains Nino Kavelashvili, Ambassador of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) to EU News.
She is also a consultant for European communication at the Federal Network for Civic Engagement (BBE) in Berlin. “And without this initiative, the issue might not be on the agenda at all,” Kavelashvili continues.
The “My Voice, My Choice” campaign is one of twelve successful European citizens’ initiatives to date. Not a particularly outstanding record, as ECI Ambassador Kavelashvili admits, considering that the instrument has already been in existence for 14 years.
One problem is that many Europeans do not realise that they can call on the EU to make a statement and thus directly influence the agenda of the EU Parliament – i.e. 720 MEPs from all EU countries.
“It’s important that we have a voice, that we have a say, that we help shape democracy,” explains ECI Ambassador Nino Kavelashvili to EU News. “And this is actually very important from a political point of view, because it shows that democracy in the EU does not only work through institutions, but is also complemented by direct participation and is also participatory.”
How the European Citizens’ Initiative works
However, a number of hurdles had to be overcome before Kovač from Slovenia could get her initiative into the EU Parliament.
Before an initiative is discussed in the EU Parliament and the Commission adopts a position, people from at least seven countries have to join forces on a single issue. This is how Nika Kovač started with the 8 March Institute in Slovenia, but sought allies in other European countries.
Broad support is then needed. “You need one million signatures from at least seven European member states. And that has to be achieved within a year,” explains Kavelashvili.
Within one year, they must then collect one million signatures from at least seven EU countries: “My Voice, My Choice” submitted 1,124,513 signatures to the European Commission in September 2025. One month later, they met the EU Commissioner for Equal Opportunities, Hadja Lahbib, and presented their initiative.
The European Citizens’ Initiative will then be heard in the EU Parliament. “And at this moment, European parliamentarians are discussing it, the media are there, and the initiative and the topic are getting attention,” says Kavelashvili. “And in my opinion, this is when things really take off in the direction of politics.”
The Commission is then obliged to publish a written and reasoned opinion within six months.
EU must respond, but not obliged to pass a law
According to Kavelashvili, it is important that the EU Commission then has to address the content of this initiative and respond with reasons. In the case of “My Voice, My Choice”, the Commission has also adopted measures.
“However, the EU Commission is not obliged to develop a legislative proposal, which is not included in this ‘package’,” emphasises Kavelashvili. Nevertheless, in her opinion, the effect will not fizzle out. The problem at the European level is that the results cannot be realised immediately. They are not very striking.
However, “My Voice, My Choice” has had the effect of putting the topic of sexual and reproductive health more firmly on the European political agenda and making it more visible in the public debate. “As a result, such initiatives can trigger political discussions and shift priorities, even if this does not automatically result in direct legislation.”
What the ECI ambassador wants to change
ECI Ambassador Nino Kavelashvili knows firsthand how fundamental the instrument of participation is in the EU, as she has only recently been able to use it. Kavelashvili is originally from Georgia, a country that is not part of the EU. She has only had a German passport for a few weeks and can therefore participate in the EU in the same way as German citizens.
She also knows where to start in order to publicise the initiative. “Communication strategies really need to be rethought and improved,” she explains, calling for more use of social media and information sessions in schools, for example.
In her opinion, a topic must not only be strong, but also understandable. “A strong topic is the main ingredient, but you cook this soup in seven countries.”
Strong networks are needed that can mobilise locally. “Translation work is also very important, not only linguistically but also culturally,” adds Kavelashvili. This is because the preparatory work is demanding and sometimes scary, says the ECI ambassador. The figure of one million signatures is “a deterrent”.
“I come from a non-EU country and therefore had no direct access to the European Citizens’ Initiative. And I found that sad,” says Kavelashvili. “And this personal experience made me realise how valuable it is to have this right, that this democratic right cannot be taken for granted.”
Democracy has broad support in Germany, as the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Democracy Monitor 2026 shows. 82% of around 5,000 respondents had an above-average positive view of the values of democracy. Principles such as elections, parliament, the separation of powers and civil rights are held in high regard by respondents.
The last European elections in 2024 also saw a high voter turnout of 50.74%. 10 years earlier, for example, this figure was 42.61%.
“I think it’s important that the voice for democracy is louder,” explains ECI Ambassador Kavelashvili. “That we are not frustrated, but that we are actually hopeful about fighting for democratic values. That’s important, especially in these times,” she told EU News.
The idea that people from different countries can build something is what the EU is for her.
There are currently 129 initiatives registered with the European Commission, including those on transport, animal welfare, and the fur ban.
Putin signals potential end to Ukraine war following Victory Day parade
Get you up to speed: Putin signals potential end to Ukraine war following Victory Day parade
Vladimir Putin indicated that he believes “the matter was coming to an end” regarding the war in Ukraine during a speech at the Victory Day parade in Moscow. Russia and Ukraine exchanged 1,000 prisoners as part of a temporary ceasefire brokered for the parade, although both sides accused each other of breaching the agreement.
Vladimir Putin suggested that an end to the war in Ukraine might be imminent, stating, “the matter was coming to an end,” during a speech at the Victory Day parade, according to the BBC. He indicated that a potential meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could occur in a ‘third country’ as a final step towards reaching a peace treaty once agreements have been established.
Vladimir Putin indicated that the end of the war in Ukraine may be approaching, stating he could meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a ‘third country’ once final agreements on a peace treaty have been reached. Additionally, Russia and Ukraine recently exchanged 1,000 prisoners as part of a temporary ceasefire, although mutual accusations of violations have arisen.
Putin says he thinks Ukraine war is ‘coming to an end’ | News World

Vladimir Putin hinted that the Ukraine war may be brought to an end soon following Saturday’s Victory Day parade in Moscow (Picture: Getty Images)
Vladimir Putin has given his strongest signal yet that he is ready to end the war in Ukraine.
The Russian president said he believed ‘the matter was coming to an end’ in a reference to what he has called a ‘special military operation’.
Putin used a speech at his nation’s pared back Victory Day parade, which took place without the usual display of military hardware, to say Russia was fighting a ‘just’ war.
But at a later press conference, the dictator told reporters the end of the four-year conflict could be in sight.
He claimed the war was a ‘confrontation’ that had been ‘fuelled by the West’, the BBC reported.
Discussing possible steps towards a permanent ceasefire, Putin said it was possible he could meet his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in a ‘third country’.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
But he added this would be a final step which could only happen ‘once final agreements have been reached on a peace treaty for a long‑term historical perspective’.
The Russian leader indicated his preferred interlocutor would be Gerhard Schröder, who served as German chancellor between 1998 and 2005.
Schröder, now 82, is a longtime friend of Putin’s and has links to Russian state-owned energy firms.
Russia and Ukraine swapped 1,000 prisoners as part of a temporary ceasefire brokered for Saturday’s parade in Moscow, to commemorate the victory over Nazi Germany.
However Kyiv was accused by Russia of breaching the agreement, while Ukrainian authorities said at least one had been killed by a Russian drone and artillery attacks in the past day.
Five people were left injured following a Russian strike on a nine-storey apartment block in the industrial district of Oleh Syniehubov, Ukraine‘s second-largest city.
Ukraine’s air force said it had intercepted all 27 strike and decoy drones fired by Russia overnight.
It comes as clip of Putin sparked discussion that the dictator had been using botox, after he was shown up close with a swollen cheek.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.









