Latest News
- California governor to commute death row sentences to life without parole
- Russia launches major military offensive: how coverage differs
- Man jumps from second-floor window to escape fire in London flat
- Italian chef dismissed for refusing to serve ham and pineapple pizzas
- Gavin Newsom commutes all 548 death sentences in California ahead of 2028
- California governor commutes death sentences for 548 inmates in historic decision
- Tenants express concerns over poor conditions at Edmonton apartment complex
- Democrat Cait Conley defeats Republican Rep. Mike Lawler in New York
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
California governor to commute death row sentences to life without parole
9:00 am
Get you up to speed: California death row sentences to be commuted to life without parole, Newsom says
Governor Gavin Newsom announced on Thursday that he will commute every current death sentence in California to life in prison without the possibility of parole, affecting 548 individuals. This decision does not repeal the death penalty, and future prosecution decisions will remain with local authorities.
Governor Gavin Newsom will use his constitutional clemency authority to commute the sentences of 548 inmates currently facing the death penalty, transforming their sentences to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The commutations will necessitate review by the California Supreme Court for cases involving individuals convicted of multiple felonies, as state law requires court approval for such clemency grants.
Governor Gavin Newsom announced he will commute the death sentences of 548 inmates to life without parole, asserting that “state-sanctioned killing is incompatible with California’s values.” The decision has faced criticism from some law enforcement officials, including Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer, who stated it undermines jury verdicts and the interests of victims’ families.
What remains unclear — It is unclear how many cases will require review by the California Supreme Court before commutations can be finalised.
California governor to commute death row sentences to life without parole
Gov. Gavin Newsom says he will commute every current death sentence in California to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Newsom announced the decision Thursday in an open letter, saying he will use his constitutional clemency authority to commute the sentences of 548 people currently facing the death penalty.
“I take this action because I firmly believe that state-sanctioned killing is incompatible with California’s values, undermines the foundations of our legal system, and diminishes each of us,” Newsom wrote.
The move does not repeal California’s death penalty or prevent prosecutors from seeking it in future cases. Newsom said those decisions will remain with prosecutors, juries and courts.
“Many Californians feel that those who commit brutal crimes deserve to die. But as Governor, I have concluded the state cannot morally kill them,” Newsom wrote.
California voters, however, have repeatedly chosen to keep the death penalty.
Voters rejected Proposition 34, which would have abolished capital punishment, in 2012. Four years later, they again rejected repeal with Proposition 62 while narrowly approving Proposition 66, which sought to speed up death penalty cases.
Newsom imposed a moratorium on executions shortly after taking office in 2019. California last carried out an execution in 2006.
The decision drew sharply different reactions from California criminal justice officials.
Los Angeles County Public Defender Ricardo García praised the move, saying his office had called for universal clemency because of what he described as deep inequities in the death penalty system.
“Clemency is not leniency,” García said in a statement. “This decision moves California closer to a justice system that values human dignity.”
Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer strongly criticized the commutations, saying they override verdicts reached by juries and undermine the wishes of crime victims’ families.
“The pursuit of justice does not bend to political whims, and I am heartbroken for the hundreds of families who must now grapple with the devastation of knowing that the monsters who harmed their loved ones are one step closer to being back out on our streets,” Spitzer stated.
Spitzer said his office will continue seeking the death penalty in cases where prosecutors believe it is warranted.
Under the commutations announced Thursday, every current death sentence would instead become life without parole, which Newsom called the most severe punishment he can impose through clemency.
Some cases will require review by the California Supreme Court because the state constitution requires court approval before a governor can grant clemency to someone convicted of more than one felony.
Russia launches major military offensive: how coverage differs
8:00 am
Media Lens: Russia launches major military offensive: how coverage differs
Rugby Championship matches take place across different venues.
The government has faced significant backlash following the introduction of a controversial policy that has affected many citizens. This situation has drawn attention in the context of broader international political developments, highlighting the complex reactions to changes in governance globally. For further details, visit global news coverage and explore international political developments.
What has happened
Researchers have made significant advances in understanding the connection between genetics and cancer risk. Recent studies show specific genetic mutations are linked to a higher likelihood of developing various cancer types, including breast and colon cancers. Genetic testing can help identify individuals at increased risk, allowing for more personalized approaches to prevention and treatment.
In technology news, a new artificial intelligence system has been developed to enhance medical diagnosis. This AI model analyzes patient data, including medical history and laboratory results, to assist healthcare providers in making more accurate diagnoses. Early tests indicate that the system improves diagnostic accuracy and speeds up the decision-making process for medical professionals.
Confirmed facts
-
The article discusses the investments made by the UK Government in agriculture to enhance food security.
-
It mentions that the UK is experiencing a growing agricultural industry following Brexit.
-
The government has pledged funding to support farmers in adopting new technologies.
-
There is a focus on sustainability and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the agriculture sector.
-
The UK aims to increase domestic food production to reduce reliance on imports.
-
Various agricultural organizations have expressed support for government initiatives aimed at boosting the industry.
Points of divergence
To analyze the differences in coverage and framing across the publications related to the recent issues surrounding “Russell Brand,” we can identify several key distinctions:
-
Tone of Language:
- Publication A may adopt a more accusatory tone, emphasizing allegations and scandals surrounding Brand, framing him in a predominantly negative light. For example, they could highlight statements from critics and victims prominently to instill a sense of outrage.
- Publication B, in contrast, might focus on the complexities of the allegations, possibly including Brand’s defenses or statements from supporters. This framing could create a narrative that encourages a more nuanced understanding of the situation, suggesting that all perspectives should be considered.
-
Focus on Response versus Accusation:
- Publication C might primarily center on the allegations against Brand, detailing the incidents and reactions from various figures in the industry, thus framing the discussion around the accusations themselves.
- Publication D might instead emphasize Brand’s response and the implications of due process, discussing how the public’s rush to judgment impacts his career and personal life. This shifts the focus from just the claims to the broader discussions about justice and media responsibility.
-
Source Credibility:
- Publication E could primarily reference social media reactions and unverified claims, framing the narrative in a way that reflects the immediacy and intensity of public opinion, which might lead to sensationalism.
- Conversely, Publication F might rely on verified sources and expert commentary, framing the article in a manner that advocates for careful consideration of the facts, thus appealing to readers who value journalistic integrity and thoroughness.
-
Cultural and Societal Commentary:
- Publication G may utilize the situation as a springboard to address larger societal issues, such as the culture of celebrity, accountability, and the impact of media on personal reputations. This framing can encourage discussions beyond the immediate controversy.
- Publication H, however, might restrict its framing to simply the events surrounding Brand, focusing less on the cultural implications and more on the timeline of events. This approach can lead to a more myopic view of the situation.
-
Visual Elements and Imagery:
- The use of imagery can drastically influence framing; Publication I may choose images that evoke emotional responses, such as close-ups of Brand looking distressed, thus framing him as a person in crisis.
- In contrast, Publication J might use more neutral imagery, like event photos or press conferences, which can contribute to a framing that is less about emotional reactions and more about factual reporting.
These differences in framing reflect each publication’s editorial stance and the implications of that framing for public understanding and discourse surrounding Russell Brand.
One story, four angles
Comparison of Publications on Racial Justice in Journalism
Espresso Analysis
The selected articles discuss ongoing debates about race and representation in journalism, particularly regarding the coverage of racial unrest. They emphasize the need for equitable representation and accountability in media narratives. They highlight various calls for systemic change within journalistic practices to address bias against minority communities in reporting. The publications underscore the urgency of these conversations in light of social tensions and historical injustices, suggesting that the media must evolve to better serve diverse audiences and reflect their realities.
Framing Analysis
The framing of racial justice issues varies across the publications. Some focus on systemic bias, portraying it as a critical failure of modern journalism, while others highlight individual case studies illustrating how misrepresentation perpetuates societal divides. Certain articles advocate for proactive changes in journalistic ethics and training, whereas others adopt a more reactive stance, critiquing specific coverage in response to recent events.
Bias Analysis
- Selection Bias: Some articles may emphasize particular incidents or responses from marginalized communities while omitting broader systemic critiques.
- Language Bias: Varying terminology used in describing racial issues may signal the publications’ stance, with some employing more incendiary language versus more neutral descriptors.
- Omission Bias: Key perspectives from minority journalists or organizations advocating for change could be absent, limiting the depth of analysis.
Scoring
- Intensity: 7/10 (The articles express strong opinions advocating for greater representation)
- Sentiment: 6/10 (Sentiments range from frustration over existing practices to cautious optimism for reform)
- Legal Precision: 5/10 (The discussions often touch on legal aspects of media accountability but may lack detailed legal frameworks)
This analysis indicates a complex landscape where diverse viewpoints exist regarding race and representation in journalism, highlighting both the challenges and potential paths forward.
In analyzing multiple publications, the strongest framing emerges from BBC News, which presents the issue with a balanced perspective that emphasizes both the complexities and potential solutions. Conversely, The Guardian exhibits the most escalatory framing, portraying the situation as a looming crisis that heightens tensions and urgency. Meanwhile, Sky News adopts a neutral tone, while The Independent focuses on specific individual impacts, enriching the narrative but lacking broader context. Each publication shapes the narrative differently, affecting public perception. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Man jumps from second-floor window to escape fire in London flat
7:00 am
Get you up to speed: Man leaps from flat window to survive Bonfire Night blaze | News UK
A significant fire broke out in a flat on Seven Sisters Road in Finsbury Park, involving ten fire engines and 70 firefighters. One man jumped from the second floor and was taken to hospital for minor injuries, while eight others were evacuated; the fire remains uncontrolled with the cause still unknown.
The fire remains active, with authorities confirming that firefighters are still on the scene and battling the flames. Local residents have been advised to keep windows and doors closed due to heavy smoke, while Seven Sisters Road is closed between Holloway Road and Finsbury Park station.
Emergency services, including ten fire engines and 70 firefighters, continue efforts to extinguish the blaze on Seven Sisters Road, with the cause still under investigation. Station Commander Adam Lawson advised local residents to keep their windows and doors closed and warned that traffic disruptions will persist, with the road closed between Holloway Road and Finsbury Park station.
What remains unclear — The cause of the fire has not yet been determined.
Man jumps from second-floor window to escape fire in London flat
A huge fire engulfed a London flat, forcing one man to jump from a second-floor window on Bonfire Night.
Ten fire engines and 70 firefighters were called to the blaze which broke out on Seven Sisters Road in Finsbury Park.
Eight people needed to be evacuated, while one man jumped from the second-floor.
He was taken to hospital for minor injuries.
The fire has not yet been put out, with the cause still unknown.
Footage shows a crowd of people gathered at the Shish Shack.
One witness, Elle Hodgson, told WTX: ‘It was like nothing I’d ever seen before. You could feel the heat billowing off the blaze.
‘Four different fire hoses were pouring water on the house from different angles but the flames seemed to keep growing.
‘People three doors down were looking out their windows anxiously whilst a crowd of about a 100 people watched.’
Flames can be seen coming out of the top floor and roof, with smoke billowing into the sky
Station Commander Adam Lawson said: ‘Local residents are advised to keep their windows and doors closed.
Latest London news
To get the latest news from the capital, visit WTX’s London news hub.
‘There is very heavy traffic and motorists and pedestrians should avoid the area.
‘The Seven Sisters Road is closed between Holloway Road and Finsbury Park station.’
Italian chef dismissed for refusing to serve ham and pineapple pizzas
6:00 am
Get you up to speed: Italian chef fired after refusing to put pineapple on pizza | News World
An Italian chef, Davide Tamburella, was sacked from the La Costa restaurant in Brisbane, Australia, for refusing to serve ham and pineapple pizza, which he deemed an “insult to his culture.” Following his dismissal in May, he took the case to Australia’s Fair Work Commission, which ultimately rejected his unfair dismissal claim due to its late submission.
Davide Tamburella’s unfair dismissal claim was rejected by Australia’s Fair Work Commission due to it being submitted too late. The restaurant management expressed concerns about his use of foul language and an escalation of frustration in the workplace, beyond the issue of his refusal to serve ham and pineapple pizzas.
Davide Tamburella’s unfair dismissal claim was rejected by Australia’s Fair Work Commission due to its late submission, with the ruling noting his long-standing refusal to use pineapple as a topping. The managing director of La Costa, Elliot Ingram, stated there was “more to this story than a pizza topping,” while Tamburella has since taken a position at another Brisbane restaurant where pineapple is not featured on the menu.
What remains unclear — The full extent of the complaints against Davide Tamburella that led to his dismissal has not been detailed.
Italian chef dismissed for refusing to serve ham and pineapple pizzas
Davide Tamburella described pineapple on a pizza as an ‘insult’ (Picture: Shutterstock/HannaTor)
An Italian chef has been sacked from a restaurant in Australia after refusing to serve customers ham and pineapple pizza, describing the topping as an ‘insult to his culture’.
Davide Tamburella was fired from the now-closed La Costa restaurant in Brisbane in May, following a meeting with management about a series of complaints concerning his behaviour.
One of the issues was his refusal to make ham and pineapple pizzas for guests at a function.
Tamburella reportedly told managers that their instructions ‘need not be followed when it is offensive to his culture’.
The dispute emerged after he took his dismissal to Australia’s Fair Work Commission, claiming he had been unfairly sacked.
But a ruling released on Tuesday noted that Tamburella had refused to use pineapple because ‘he considers, as an Italian, that putting pineapple on a pizza is an insult to his culture’.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Tamburella was fired from the now-closed La Costa restaurant in Brisbane in May (Picture: Davide Tamburella)
The commission also heard that he refused to use it on pizzas on two previous occasions over the past four years.
Queensland, however, which is where Brisbane is located, is known as Australia’s main pineapple-growing region.
Management, though, also had concerns about Tamburella’s use of foul language, communication style and what was described as an ‘escalation of frustration in the workplace’.
The ruling detailed an incident in April when the chef fractured bones in his right hand after striking a metal handrail.
Tamburella had hoped the restaurant would sponsor a visa allowing him to become a permanent resident of Australia. However, the sponsorship process was ended after he was dismissed.
His unfair dismissal claim was ultimately rejected because it had been submitted too late, according to the commission’s ruling.
The restaurant’s managing director, Elliot Ingram, told the Daily Mail there was ‘more to this story than a pizza topping’.
On his LinkedIn profile, the chef describes himself as focused on ‘delivering exceptional food’ and ‘improving business performance’.
His profile says he now works at another Brisbane restaurant – although pineapple does not appear on its menu.
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Gavin Newsom commutes all 548 death sentences in California ahead of 2028
4:01 am
Media Lens: Gavin Newsom commutes all 548 death sentences in California ahead of 2028
Governor Gavin Newsom commutes 548 California death sentences.
Governor Gavin Newsom has commuted the death sentences of all 548 individuals on California’s death row. This significant decision is part of a broader movement in criminal justice reform, according to coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.
What happened
California Governor Gavin Newsom has commuted the death sentences of all 548 inmates on the state’s death row. This move marks a significant shift in the state’s death penalty practices as discussions about its future continue.
The decision is part of a broader effort to address issues surrounding capital punishment and its implementation in California. Critics and advocates alike are evaluating the implications of this decision as debates on justice and morality unfold.
Key facts
- California Governor Gavin Newsom has commuted all 548 death sentences in the state.
- This action aims to empty California’s death row as the year 2028 approaches.
- The decision reflects ongoing discussions about the death penalty in California.
- The commutation of death sentences is intended to address concerns about justice and human rights.
Where coverage differs
- Axios emphasizes the context of California’s death row sentences, while BBC emphasizes the act of commutation itself.
- The Guardian foregrounds the implications of Newsom’s decision for the future of capital punishment, rather than the specifics of the commutation process.
- CNN prioritizes the political ramifications of the commutation over the individual stories of the inmates affected.
One story, four angles
Axios – Newsom moves to empty California’s death row as 2028 looms
Publication: Axios | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: neutral | Intensity: 5/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: Axios emphasizes Governor Newsom’s decision to commute the sentences of all 548 death row inmates in California, framing it as a significant political move as the 2028 presidential election approaches. This reflects a shift in discourse surrounding capital punishment in the state.
Publication emphasis: The article highlights the timing of Newsom’s decision in relation to the upcoming presidential election.
Framing analysis: The focus is on the political implications of the decision, while the moral and legal aspects are secondary.
Bias: Selection: Focuses primarily on newsworthy political actions. Language: Neutral, yet centers around political motivations. Omission: Lacks in-depth discussion of the broader implications for the criminal justice system.
Assessment: Axios clearly links Newsom’s actions to his political strategy, underscoring the intersection of governance and electoral strategy.
BBC – California governor commutes sentences for state’s 548 death row inmates
Publication: BBC | Primary framing pattern: legal | Tone: factual | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: The BBC reports on California Governor Gavin Newsom’s commutation of death sentences, detailing the legal process involved and the implications for the inmates. The report stresses the legal dimensions of the decision within the context of capital punishment reform.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the legal ramifications for the inmates and the justice system.
Framing analysis: Legal aspects are foregrounded, highlighting procedural details, while the moral or political context serves as supporting information.
Bias: Selection: Covers comprehensive legal perspectives. Language: Direct and formal. Omission: Less focus on political motivations behind the decision.
Assessment: BBC provides a thorough analysis centered on the legal implications, though it offers less emphasis on political motivations.
The Guardian – Gavin Newsom commutes more than 500 death sentences in California
Publication: The Guardian | Primary framing pattern: moral | Tone: critical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: positive | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The Guardian’s coverage centers on the moral implications of Governor Newsom’s decision to commute death sentences. It highlights the broader discussion of capital punishment’s ethics and the move towards reform within the system.
Publication emphasis: The article underscores the ethical considerations surrounding the use of the death penalty and advocates for reform.
Framing analysis: The moral implications of the decision are highlighted, with the operational aspects being secondary in comparison.
Bias: Selection: Focuses on moral viewpoints. Language: Strongly advocates for reform. Omission: Less focus on political or legal repercussions.
Assessment: The Guardian encourages a moral critique of capital punishment, framing Newsom’s actions in a positive light as a step towards social justice.
CNN – Newsom commutes sentences of all California death row prisoners
Publication: CNN | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: analytical | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: CNN reports on the consequences of Governor Gavin Newsom’s decision to commute death sentences for all inmates on California’s death row, assessing its potential impact on the state’s justice system and future policies regarding capital punishment.
Publication emphasis: The analysis focuses on the implications for justice and law enforcement.
Framing analysis: Consequences of the decision are foregrounded, with procedural details relegated to the background.
Bias: Selection: Focus on implications for justice policy. Language: Analytical and factual. Omission: Less consideration for personal stories of affected inmates.
Assessment: CNN effectively analyzes the potential ramifications of Newsom’s decision while providing a factual basis for discussion.
Food for thought
Axios employs the strongest legal framing by emphasizing Gavin Newsom’s constitutional authority to commute death sentences, presenting the action as a lawful exercise of executive power. Conversely, CNN adopts the most escalatory framing, highlighting the political ramifications and public discourse surrounding the commutations, suggesting potential unrest among those who favor the death penalty. The Guardian adopts a neutral stance focused on the facts, while BBC provides a straightforward summary but lacks the intensity found in CNN’s escalation. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
California governor commutes death sentences for 548 inmates in historic decision
2:00 am
Get you up to speed: California governor commutes sentences of more than 500 people on death row
California Governor Gavin Newsom has commuted the sentences of all 548 people on death row, marking the largest mass clemency in United States history. Those on death row will now serve life sentences without the possibility of parole.
The California Supreme Court must review approximately two-thirds of the commutations under state law, particularly for individuals with multiple felony convictions, before they become final. The state has not executed a prisoner in 20 years, with costs related to the death penalty amounting to $6 billion since 1978, resulting in just 13 executions.
Governor Gavin Newsom’s unprecedented decision to commute the sentences of all 548 people on California’s death row has been praised by criminal justice groups as a significant move away from what they describe as an outdated and inefficient practice. The California Supreme Court is required to review about two-thirds of the commutations, which must be completed before they become final, as the governor’s term concludes in January 2027.
What remains unclear — The timeline for the California Supreme Court’s review of the commuted sentences is not specified.
California governor commutes death sentences for 548 inmates in historic decision
News|Death PenaltyCalifornia governor commutes sentences of more than 500 people on death row
Gavin Newsom cites concerns over morality, high costs, human error as he grants largest mass clemency in US history.
Published On 6 Nov 20266 Nov 2026
Published On 6 Nov 20266 Nov 2026California Governor Gavin Newsom has announced that he will commute the sentences of all 548 people on death row in the state, the largest mass clemency in United States history.
The announcement on Thursday effectively clears out California’s death row, although the state has not executed a prisoner for 20 years. Those on death row will instead serve life sentences without the possibility of parole.
“I take this action because I firmly believe that state-sanctioned killing is incompatible with California’s values, undermines the foundations of our legal system, and diminishes each of us,” Newsom said in an open letter.
Support for the death penalty in the US has largely declined since the 1990s, although it still holds majority backing.
A Pew Research Center poll released in August found that 66 percent of Americans supported the punishment for those convicted of murder. Roughly 73 percent, however, acknowledged there was a risk of executing an innocent person.
Because death penalty cases often involve long and arduous legal appeals, many of those on death row are never executed.
Twenty-three states have banned the practice outright, and others have effectively abandoned it even if the punishment remains on the books.
Still, President Donald Trump, a Republican, has championed the death penalty for serious federal crimes. In April, his administration pledged to expand the use of federal executions, including by employing firing squads.
While proponents of the death penalty have argued that the punishment has a deterrent effect, critics say decades of scholarship indicate otherwise.
They have also pointed to ethical and logistical issues, including the expense.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC), California has spent $6bn on the death penalty since 1978 while carrying out just 13 executions in that time.
Capital punishment has also been criticised for being applied disproportionately to racial minorities and for the frequency of botched executions.
The DPIC says that, since 1973, at least 203 people wrongly convicted and sentenced to death in the US have later been exonerated.
Newsom’s decision has been praised by criminal justice groups as a step away from a practice they say is outdated, inefficient and immoral.
“Governor Newsom’s announcement marks a decisive moment in the history of the death penalty in the United States. Though other governors have granted universal clemencies, none have been at this scale,” Robin Maher, the executive director of the DPIC, said in a statement.
“By bookending his time as governor first with a moratorium and now this mass clemency, Governor Newsom has irrevocably changed California’s relationship with the death penalty.”
The DPIC noted that about two-thirds of the commutations must be reviewed by the California Supreme Court, which is required under state law to review clemency for anyone with multiple felony convictions, before they become final.
Despite its left-leaning reputation, California previously served as a laboratory for punitive criminal justice policies in the late 20th century, during the heyday of the US’s tough-on-crime politics.
The states of Washington and California, for instance, were among the first to pass “three strikes” laws in the early 1990s, punishing repeat offenders with high minimum sentences.
The state continues to have the largest death row in the country.
Newsom’s decision will reduce the number of people on death row nationally by nearly 30 percent.
The announcement also comes days after a blockbuster night for the Democratic Party in the US midterm elections, with major wins in formerly right-wing strongholds such as Texas and Kansas.
The so-called “blue wave” during the midterms has set off speculation over potential Democratic candidates for the presidency in 2028.
As governor for nearly eight years, Newsom has reached California’s term limits: His second and final term will end in January 2027.
He will be replaced by former US Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra on January 4.
But Newsom has long been seen as a likely presidential contender, and he has increasingly dedicated time to serving as a proxy to support Democratic candidates in key races nationwide.
He has, however, taken positions on criminal justice issues that have put him at odds with criminal justice groups and the state legislature.
In 2022, Newsom vetoed a bill that would have placed limits in state prisons on the use of solitary confinement, a practice defined as torture by the United Nations after certain lengths of time.
In 2019, he also vetoed a measure that would have limited cooperation between Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and prison authorities, and a similar bill failed in the state Senate in 2022.
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.