LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Why Caoimhin Kelleher is not playing for Brentford against Burnley today

Why Caoimhin Kelleher is not playing for Brentford against Burnley today | Football

TL;DR – Two-minute read

Caoimhin Kelleher was omitted from Brentford’s squad ahead of their Premier League match against Burnley due to the birth of his child. The team aimed to recover from a 2-0 defeat to Brighton, starting the day in seventh place, while Burnley sought points to escape the relegation zone. Hakon Valdimarsson made his first league start in Kelleher’s absence.

Caoimhin Kelleher misses out for Brentford today

Caoimhin Kelleher has been left out of the Brentford squad for their Premier League match against Burnley this afternoon due to the birth of his child. This absence comes as Brentford seeks to rebound from their recent 2-0 defeat to Brighton and aims to maintain their hopes of European football next season.

Brentford currently sit in seventh place and could narrow the gap to fifth-place Chelsea to just two points with a victory at Turf Moor against relegation-threatened Burnley. Keith Andrews, the Brentford manager, confirmed the news ahead of kick-off, saying: “Caoimhin’s partner had a baby. We are delighted for them and we wish them well but he couldn’t play today.”

Kelleher’s absence is not injury-related, and in his place, Hakon Valdimarsson has been given his first start of the league season. Brentford has made a total of five changes to their lineup, with Michael Kayode returning from injury to replace Aaron Hickey at right-back, and Mikkel Damsgaard, Yehor Yarmoliuk, and Kevin Schade coming in for Jordan Henderson, Keane Lewis-Potter, and Vitaly Janelt.

Burnley have also made adjustments to their squad, making three changes from their impressive 1-1 draw with Chelsea last weekend. They currently occupy 19th place, eight points adrift of safety.

Trump has plunged the Middle East into a conflict that may last for weeks.

Get you up to speed: Trump has plunged the Middle East into a conflict that may last for weeks.

MID-EAST CONFLICT ESCALATION
Donald Trump has unleashed American military force against Iran without UN or US Congress approval, risking significant regional instability and global economic repercussions.

UK RESPONSE
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stated that British bases will not be used to support the assault on Iran due to concerns about international law.

NEXT STEPS
Diplomatic talks are scheduled for Monday in Geneva as the situation escalates following Donald Trump’s military decision against Iran.

What we know so far

Donald Trump has rolled the dice again, stunning the world by choosing the most extreme option over Iran.

His decision to attack and try and topple Iran’s regime with the backing of Israel tips the Middle East into a massive war that could last weeks.

By the end of last week, the stage had been set for more diplomacy. Talks in Geneva had been making some progress and more were planned for Monday.

Trump has plunged the Middle East into a conflict that may last for weeks.
Image: Smoke rises on the skyline after an explosion in Tehran. Pic: AP

Iran strikes US military base in Bahrain

That appears to have been a ruse, to lull the enemy into thinking an attack was not imminent.

Mr. Trump has unleashed American military force without either the approval of the UN or the US Congress.

There has been no pretence at securing even a fig leaf of justification under international law.

He had been urged by allies in the region, apart from Israel, to avoid war.

If it leads to the end of the ayatollahs’ regime, there will be jubilation among them, but that is a very big if.

Iran had warned it would take the gloves off if attacked and will most likely do just that, its leadership seeing this as a fight for survival.

Smoke rises from alleged pro-Iranian Hezbollah areas in the southern Lebanese village of Katrani. Pic: AP
Image: Smoke rises from alleged pro-Iranian Hezbollah areas in the southern Lebanese village of Katrani. Pic: AP
Smoke rises following an explosion in Tehran. Pic: Reuters
Image: Smoke rises following an explosion in Tehran. Pic: Reuters

There are already reports of attacks on countries and installations across the Persian Gulf.

It is a seaway through which a fifth of the world’s oil passes, so a sustained conflict is likely to have major repercussions on the global economy.

The American-Israeli offensive poses a dilemma for Britain.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, worried about the implications under international law, has ruled out British bases being used to support the assault on Iran.

There will be severe misgivings at the highest level of government here about the wisdom and legality of this unprecedented move by Britain’s closest ally but there will also be a determination that it does not damage transatlantic relations.

And there will be the suspicion that this has been motivated more by Donald Trump’s deepening domestic woes than by sound military thinking.

He faces an affordability crisis back home and continuing pressure over the Epstein scandal.

This is a massive gamble by an American president whose popularity is plummeting.

He has set the objective high, hoping to sufficiently damage Iran’s regime so that its people can rise up and take over.

Anything short of that may be seen as an expensive failure, which could prove very costly for Mr. Trump in the run-up to this year’s vital US mid-term elections.

European Commission and EU Council express concern over Iran developments

Get you up to speed: European Commission and EU Council express concern over Iran developments

REGIONAL SECURITY ESCALATION
The European Commission and EU Council stated that developments in Iran are “greatly concerning” and reaffirmed the EU’s commitment to safeguarding regional security and stability.

EU RESPONSE
The European Commission stated that recent developments in Iran pose significant risks to security, reiterating their dedication to maintaining regional stability.

EU RESPONSE
The European Commission and EU Council are prepared to address security concerns regarding Iran at an upcoming ministerial meeting.

What we know so far

European Commission and EU Council express concern over Iran developments

A joint statement by the European Commission and the EU Council noted the developments in Iran were “greatly concerning” and reaffirmed what it called the EU’s “steadfast commitment to safeguarding regional security and stability.”

US and Israel Launch Major Attacks on Iran Amid Escalating Tensions

Media Lens: US and Israel Launch Major Attacks on Iran Amid Escalating Tensions

Story focus: U.S. and Israel attack Iran amid Trump’s confirmation.

Primary entity: Trump

Region: Iran

The U.S. and Israel have launched major combat operations against Iran, with President Trump confirming the military action. Reports indicate that Tehran is experiencing chaos and panic as airstrikes shake the city.

Quick links:
What has happened |
Confirmed details |
What remains unclear |
One story, four angles |
What’s missing |
Related links


What has happened

The U.S. and Israel have initiated significant military actions against Iran, with former President Trump confirming the commencement of “major combat operations.” This announcement comes amidst rising tensions, as reports indicate that Iran is launching retaliatory strikes in response. These developments have created a chaotic atmosphere in Tehran, characterized by panic as airstrikes impact the city.

In parallel, Trump has cautioned that some Americans may face danger due to the ongoing military engagements. News outlets are providing live updates on the situation, reflecting the urgency and gravity of the conflict as it unfolds. The international community is closely monitoring the repercussions of this escalation, with widespread concerns about the potential for further violence.

Confirmed details

  • The U.S. and Israel launched coordinated attacks on Iran.
  • Former President Trump confirmed that “major combat operations” are occurring.
  • Tehran has initiated retaliatory strikes against U.S. targets.
  • There are indications of chaos and panic in Tehran following the airstrikes.
  • Trump warned that some Americans may be at risk due to the military actions.
  • The situation is being closely monitored by news outlets for live updates.

What remains unclear

  • What specific actions the U.S. and Israel are taking in the attack on Iran.
  • The full extent of casualties or damage resulting from the military operations.
  • Details on the response from Iran, including any specific retaliatory measures they may have taken.
  • Clarification on which parts of the media coverage may be inconsistent regarding the implications of Trump’s statements.
  • Information on the public and political reaction within the U.S. regarding the military actions.

One story, four angles


CBS News – Live Updates: U.S. and Israel attack Iran, with Trump confirming “major combat operations”

Publication: CBS News | Primary framing pattern: Breaking news update | Tone register: Urgent | Intensity level: High (8/10) | Sentiment: -0.5 | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot:
As the situation escalates in Iran, CBS News provides real-time updates. The framing emphasizes urgency, reflecting the severe implications of U.S. and Israeli military actions.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
The report highlights immediate developments while downplaying historical context or broader implications of military intervention.

Bias:
Selection: Focus on immediate military actions.
Language: Use of urgent terms like “breaking news” and “major combat operations.”
Omission: Little historical context on U.S.-Iran relations.

Assessment:
The coverage exemplifies a singular focus on real-time events, possibly overshadowing the complexities of the situation.


AP News – Live updates: Tehran launches retaliatory strikes as Trump calls for regime change

Publication: AP News | Primary framing pattern: Ongoing conflict update | Tone register: Analytical | Intensity level: High (7/10) | Sentiment: -0.4 | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot:
AP News covers retaliatory actions from Iran alongside U.S. commentary, framing a complex interplay of military responses. This creates a dual narrative of conflict escalation.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
This update balances between the Iranian response and U.S. intentions, yet risks oversimplifying the geopolitical ramifications.

Bias:
Selection: Highlights both U.S. and Iranian actions.
Language: Terms like “retaliatory strikes” indicate a focus on military responses.
Omission: Lacks in-depth analysis of the consequences of proposed regime change.

Assessment:
The article provides a necessary update but may oversimplify a highly nuanced conflict.


Reuters – Trump warns some Americans may die amid US strikes in Iran

Publication: Reuters | Primary framing pattern: Cautionary reporting | Tone register: Serious | Intensity level: Medium (6/10) | Sentiment: -0.6 | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot:
Reuters focuses on statements from Trump indicating potential American casualties, framing the U.S. strikes as a serious risk to nationals abroad. This adds a layer of human impact to the military operations.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
By highlighting the risk to American lives, the report raises concern while also implicating deeper political stakes in military action.

Bias:
Selection: Emphasis on American citizens’ safety.
Language: The phrase “some Americans may die” is alarming and highlights personal stakes.
Omission: Limited examination of military justification or broader strategies.

Assessment:
This cautionary reporting effectively underscores the potential human cost of military actions.


The New York Times – Chaos and Panic Grip Tehran as Airstrikes Shake City

Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: Descriptive reporting | Tone register: Dramatic | Intensity level: High (9/10) | Sentiment: -0.7 | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot:
The New York Times captures the turmoil in Tehran through dramatic descriptions of the response to airstrikes, emphasizing the chaos and emotional strain on citizens, alongside geopolitical tensions.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
The dramatic framing enhances emotional engagement but may risk sensationalizing critical events, overshadowing analytical depth.

Bias:
Selection: Focuses on emotional and chaotic responses within Tehran.
Language: Terms like “chaos” and “panic” amplify the emotional intensity.
Omission: Lacks context on the historical origins of the conflict and its broader implications.

Assessment:
This coverage powerfully conveys the immediate impact of conflict, though it may sacrifice analytical rigor for dramatic effect.

What’s missing across coverage

  • Lack of context regarding prior U.S.-Iran relations and history of conflict leading to the current events.
  • Absence of insights into the potential consequences of military operations for civilian populations in Iran.
  • No explanation of the strategic objectives of the U.S. and Israel in the operation, including geopolitical implications.
  • Insufficient coverage of international reactions and potential diplomatic fallout from the attacks.

The different headlines each present contrasting frames around the ongoing conflict involving the U.S. and Iran. CBS News emphasizes a legal approach, citing “major combat operations,” which could imply a focus on constitutional or international law ramifications. In contrast, AP News adopts a more escalatory frame by depicting Tehran’s “retaliatory strikes,” heightening the immediacy and drama of the situation. The New York Times captures the chaos in Tehran, framing the situation through a lens of civilian impact, which could potentially heighten political pressure for accountability among lawmakers and critics. Reuters warns of potential American casualties, reflecting a narrative that could fuel concerns about military engagement consequences. Each headline’s framing speaks to different legal and political narratives that may influence public perception and debate.

The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.


CBS News

Live Updates: U.S. and Israel attack Iran, with Trump confirming “major combat operations”

AP News

Live updates: Tehran launches retaliatory strikes as Trump calls for regime change

Reuters

Trump warns some Americans may die amid US strikes in Iran

The New York Times

Chaos and Panic Grip Tehran as Airstrikes Shake City

Tube Flasher Who Targeted Solo Women Sentenced to Prison | News UK

Get you up to speed: Tube Flasher Who Targeted Solo Women Sentenced to Prison | News UK

TRANSPORT POLICE ACTION
Matheus Prestes, 30, was jailed for eight months following an investigation by the British Transport Police for exposing himself to women on the Bakerloo line.

COURT SENTENCE
Matheus Prestes was sentenced to eight months in prison for eight counts of exposure at Inner London Crown Court, according to British Transport Police.

COURT OUTCOME
Matheus Prestes has been sentenced to eight months’ imprisonment by the Inner London Crown Court for eight counts of exposure on the Bakerloo line.

What we know so far

A 30-year-old man who exposed himself to lone women as they travelled on the London Underground network has been jailed, following a British Transport Police (BTP) investigation.Matheus Prestes, 11/04/95, of no fixed address, pleaded guilty to eight counts of exposure at a court hearing in November 2025.On Friday 13 February at Inner London Crown Court, he was sentenced to eight months? imprisonment.The court heard how Prestes embarked on a spree of sexual offending, targeting lone women travelling on the Bakerloo line.
Matheus Prestes was jailed for eight months over his spree of sexual offending (Picture: BTP)

A sexual predator who repeatedly flashed lone women travelling on the Tube has been jailed for eight months.

Matheus Prestes, 30, targeted his victims on the Bakerloo line in a spree lasting four months from June to October last year.

He admitted eight counts of exposure at Inner London Crown Court earlier this month.

The British Transport Police (BTP) praised the bravery of the women in coming forward to report the pervert.

BTP Sergeant James Ashby said: ‘Prestes repeatedly targeted women on the London Underground in deliberate and predatory acts.

‘His behaviour was disturbing, persistent, and entirely unacceptable. It is down to these brave women reporting these incidents that we were able to piece together his spree of offending and put him behind bars.’

Prestes’s first reported incident took place at around 7pm on Saturday, June 21, when he stepped off a Bakerloo line service at Baker Street, turned around and exposed himself while staring at a woman still on board the train.

Days later, on June 25, he again exposed himself and began masturbating in front of another woman on a southbound Bakerloo line service.

When she told him she was reporting his actions to the police, he quickly got off the train at Edgware Road.

LONDON, UK - JANUARY 28, 2025: Baker Street London Underground station platform with an arriving Tube train. One of the oldest and most famous stations, known for its Sherlock Holmes connection; Shutterstock ID 2672022097; purchase_order: -; job: -; client: -; other:
Prestes targeted lone women travelling on the Bakerloo Line (Picture: Shutterstock/Sergii Figurnyi)

On Sunday, July 6, at around 6pm, Prestes targeted another lone woman on a Bakerloo line service near Kenton.

After exposing himself on board the train, he got off, stood on the platform, and stared at her while masturbating.

Then, on Tuesday, August 5, he walked along a Tube carriage before he exposed himself to a woman near Lambeth North.

Later that month, on Friday, August 22, another woman reported that Prestes had exposed himself to her between Oxford Circus and Waterloo before masturbating in her eyeline and leaving the train.

On Saturday, October 11, he targeted three women in a day, again on Bakerloo line trains. On each occasion he exposed himself to a lone woman and immediately got off the train.

Sgt Ashby said: ‘This sentence reflects the seriousness of his actions. ‘Passengers can be reassured that we will always take reports of sexual offences seriously, act quickly to identify offenders, and work tirelessly to bring them before the courts.’

Iran’s ballistic missile stockpile raises concerns over regional security dynamics

Get you up to speed: Iran‘s ballistic missile stockpile raises concerns over regional security dynamics

Iran began a series of military exercises in the Strait of Hormuz on February 16, 2026, as reported by state media. The exercises were conducted by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and navy. Iran currently enriches uranium to near weapons-grade levels of 60%, the only country without a nuclear weapons programme to do so.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) initiated military exercises in the Strait of Hormuz on 16 February 2026, as reported by state media. According to Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the agency is unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities, highlighting the urgent need to address the “loss of continuity of knowledge.” The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence noted that Iran possesses the largest stockpile of ballistic missiles in the Middle East, with a range sufficient to reach Israel.

Iran has not allowed the UN to inspect the damaged nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan since the previous military strikes. The latest IAEA report highlighted that they “cannot verify whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities” or ascertain the size of Iran’s uranium stockpile at these facilities. Following the attacks, plans are underway for the UK to purchase a dozen F-35A warplanes from the US, which will be capable of carrying nuclear weapons.

What we know so far

Does Iran have nuclear weapons and what missiles do they have? | News World

SEI 285430827 0997United States. (Photo by SEPAH NEWS / AFP via Getty Images) / == RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE – MANDATORY CREDIT "AFP PHOTO / HO / SEPAHNEWS" – NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS – DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS ==” decoding=”sync”/>
Iran has the biggest stockpile of ballistic missiles in the Middle East, according to the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence (Picture: Sepah News/AFP via Getty Images)

As the world reels from what Trump has called ‘major combat operations’ by the US military in Iran, we are faced with more questions than answers.

What kind of nuclear weapons do enemies Iran and Israel possess — and how many? Could the conflict trigger a wider regional conflict – or even World War III?

As the sound of bombing raids rings out once again in the Middle East, understanding what is at stake is more important than ever.

This is everything we know about Iran and Israel’s nuclear arsenals.

Does Iran have nuclear weapons?

Both US intelligence and the UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), have said that Iran closed down its nuclear weapons development programme in 2003.

But according to the IAEA, Tehran has in recent years continued enriching uranium, including to near weapons-grade.

All three of the plants where that was happening were hit in the last US strikes on Iran last June.

However, while Trump gloated that the strikes had obliterated Tehran’s nuclear facilities, IEA director general Rafael Grossi warned Iran could resume enrichment on a more limited scale within months.

Iran has not allowed the UN to inspect either of the damaged facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan since last summer’s ’12-day war’.

Just this week an IAEA report stressed it ‘cannot verify whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities’, or the ‘size of Iran’s uranium stockpile at the affected nuclear facilities’.

The report stressed that the ‘loss of continuity of knowledge … needs to be addressed with the utmost urgency’.

Iran map following airstrikes.
Map showing where Israel has targeted Iran (Picture: Anadolu via Getty Images)

Iran now enriches uranium to near weapons-grade levels of 60%, the only country in the world without a nuclear weapons programme to do so.

Under a 2015 nuclear deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium up to 3.67% purity and to maintain a uranium stockpile of 300kg.

Since the start of his second term in the Oval Office, Trump has been working to reach an agreement on curbing Iran’s programme.

There had been several rounds of talks between the US and Iran until the Israeli attacks, and Trump had imposed new sanctions on Iran as part of his ‘maximum pressure’ campaign.

How far is Iran from a nuclear bomb?

A nuclear bomb isn’t something you can build overnight. It requires something called uranium enrichment.

Uranium contains a radioactive isotope called U-235, that can be used as a power source. The more refined it is – in other words, enriched – the more powerful. Power is increased by spinning U-235 in a container known as a centrifuge.

Nuclear power plants only need relatively unenriched uranium at 0.7% to 5%, while weapons-grade nuclear weapons require 90%.

The IAEA says Iran has about 400kg worth of uranium enriched to 60%. At 90% enrichment, this is enough for 10 warheads.

Iran Watch warns that the country could enrich enough uranium for one weapon in four months, and five weapons in one year and eight months.

However, it’s worth noting that Iran would also need to build a warhead and a missile capable of delivering it.

What missiles does Iran have?

Iran has the biggest stockpile of ballistic missiles in the Middle East, according to the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Their range of 1,240 miles is enough for self-defence, Iranian officials have said, because they can reach Israel.

Many of Iran’s missile sites are in and around Tehran.

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Sepahnews/ZUMA Press Wire/Shutterstock (16018807r) An Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) missile launches during a military drill off Iran's southern coast. The IRGC Navy has launched a two-day exercise spanning the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Sea of Oman, showcasing its operational capabilities, including newly deployed domestically produced air-defense systems as well as missile and drone units. Iran Holds Naval Drill In Strait Of Hormuz, Persian Gulf - 04 Dec 2025
An Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) missile launches during a military drill off Iran’s southern coast (Picture: Sepahnews/ZUMA Press Wire/Shutterstock)

There are at least five known underground ‘missile cities’ in various provinces, including Kermanshah and Semnan, as well as near the Gulf region.

Tehran’s missile arsenal is thought to include the Sejil, Ghadr and Khorramshahr, all with a range of 1,240 miles, as well as the Emad (1,050 miles), Shahab-3 and Hoveyzeh (830 miles).

Does Israel have nuclear weapons?

Israel’s military superiority in the Middle East comes not just through its conventional arsenal or the backing of the US, but from its nuclear arsenal.

Israel is widely believed to have one of the most advanced nuclear programmes in the world, but it has never confirmed or denied its existence.

@metrouk

Britain will buy a dozen F-35A warplanes, all capable of carrying nuclear weaponsm from the US, following criticism from Donald Trump that Nato members are not spending enough on defence. Sir Keir Starmer will tell a summit of Nato allies in The Hague that the new squadron will join an alliance mission that can be armed with US nuclear weapons. The prime minister is expected to say: ‘The UK’s commitment to Nato is unquestionable, as is the alliance’s contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure. ‘But we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come.’ #uknews #war #fighterplanes #nato

♬ War Drums – Audiosphere

Because it has never signed to the non-proliferation treaty, Israel is not subject to independent IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities.

Since the 1960s, successive governments have followed a policy of nuclear ambiguity. In the early days, Israel went to great lengths to hide its nuclear ambitions from the international community, even its closest allies.

Even US inspectors were misled during early visits to the Nuclear Research Center near Dimona, in the Negev desert, which was initially described as a textile factory.

Today, estimates of its stockpile range between 90 and 400 warheads, all of which could be delivered by air, as cruise missiles fired from submarines and through the Jericho line of ballistic missiles.

A few days before Israel’s attack on Iran, in which dozens of people – most of them civilians – were killed, Iran had threatened to release a hoard of Israeli nuclear secrets it claims to have obtained.

Iran’s intelligence minister, Esmail Khatib, claimed the regime had obtained ‘a vast collection of strategic and sensitive documents, including plans and data on the nuclear facilities’.

Why has the US attacked Iran?

In his statement last night, President Trump said the objective of his ‘major combat operations’ was to ‘defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime’.

He said: ‘Its menacing activities directly endanger the United States, our troops our basis overseas and our allies throughout the world.

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

‘For 47 years, the Iranian regime has chanted “Death to America” and waged an unending campaign of bloodshed and mass murder, targeting the United States, our troops and innocent people in many, many countries.’

Trump added: ‘Iran is the world’s number one state sponsor of terror, and just recently killed tens of thousands of its own citizens on the street as they protested.

‘It has always been the policy of the United States, in particular, my administration, that this terrorist regime can never have a nuclear weapon.

‘I’ll say it again. They can never have a nuclear weapon.’

Could the Israel-Iran conflict lead to World War III?

Even after the involvement of the US, it is unlikely that it will result in a global conflict.

Speaking after the last strikes on Iran, Jason Pack, fellow at Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) and host of the Disorder Podcast, told WTX News that the regime has been ‘really weakened’.

He said: ‘The Iranians don’t have the capability to bring us to World War III.

‘It is much more likely to see the Iranian people rise up against the regime than we are to see the Iranians like land some decisive blow against Israel.’

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX News as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

LIVE German 2025 Election