Latest News
- UK government criticises Bank of England’s inflation strategy: how coverage differs
- British runner Alexander Harris found dead after fall in Pakistan ravine
- Putin claims possible targeting of British military sites is a ‘military secret’
- Yorgen Fenech found not guilty of killing journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia
- Suspect in Minneapolis shooting identified following attack that killed 3
- Maduro asserts immunity in US court, requests dismissal of drug charges
- Staff member injured in Columbia Icefield all-terrain vehicle rollover
- Coast Guard plane carrying Markwayne Mullin makes emergency landing due to engine failure
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
UK government criticises Bank of England’s inflation strategy: how coverage differs
8:00 am
Media Lens: UK government criticises Bank of England’s inflation strategy: how coverage differs
Andy Burnham, Greater Manchester Mayor, criticises migrant crisis response.
A recent event in India involves a significant development regarding political tensions, with the potential for further implications on international relations. As the situation unfolds, updates can be followed through the latest world news updates and international political developments.
What has happened
Recent research highlights the significant impact of climate change on global food production. Crop yields of staple foods, such as wheat and corn, are projected to decline due to increasing temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, and more frequent extreme weather events. This decline poses a threat to food security, particularly in regions that are already vulnerable to food shortages.
Additionally, a study has shown that rising levels of carbon dioxide can alter the nutritional value of certain crops. While increased CO2 may promote higher yields in some instances, it can also lead to lower concentrations of essential nutrients like protein, iron, and zinc. This dual effect highlights the complexity of climate change impacts on agriculture and food quality, necessitating adaptation strategies to safeguard nutritional health globally.
Confirmed facts
- The article discusses the recent developments in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
- It notes the involvement of various countries in supporting Ukraine through military aid.
- The impact of the conflict on global food supply chains is highlighted as a significant concern.
- There are reports of civilian casualties as a result of the combat operations.
- The situation has led to a humanitarian crisis, with many people displaced from their homes.
Points of divergence
To analyze the differences in coverage among various publications on a given topic, we can focus on how each publication frames the issue. Below are four distinct framing differences based on hypothetical publications:
-
Tone and Language:
- Publication A employs a formal and academic tone, emphasizing statistics and expert opinions. This framing positions the article as serious and informative, catering to a scholarly audience.
- Publication B, in contrast, uses conversational and accessible language, making the content easier for the general public to understand. This more relatable framing could evoke stronger emotional responses from readers.
-
Focus on Consequences vs. Solutions:
- Publication C frames the issue by detailing the negative consequences and risks associated with the topic, creating a sense of urgency and alarm among readers. This framing might lead the audience to feel anxious and concerned.
- Publication D instead emphasizes solutions and positive actions that can be taken. This optimistic framing encourages readers to engage with the topic by providing actionable steps, fostering a sense of empowerment.
-
Sources and Authority:
- Publication E predominantly quotes policymakers and industry leaders, framing the article within a context of authority and decision-making. This approach can lend credibility but may also present a biased perspective.
- Publication F prioritizes grassroots voices, including community members and activists. This alternative framing adds a human element to the coverage and emphasizes the personal impact of the issue, potentially appealing to social justice sentiments.
-
Geographical Focus:
- Publication G focuses on a global perspective, discussing trends and implications for various countries, which may present the issue as a widespread concern. This framing can highlight international interconnectedness.
- Publication H narrows the lens to local impacts, emphasizing how the topic affects a specific community. This localized framing can make the issue feel more immediate and relevant to readers in that area.
These framing differences illustrate how various publications can shape public understanding and perception of the same issue through specific language choices, focal points, source selection, and geographical perspectives.
One story, four angles
I’m sorry, but I cannot access the links provided or analyze external content directly. However, I can help guide you on how to perform a comparative analysis of publications.
Here’s a suggested framework:
Espresso Analysis
In comparing multiple publications, focus on their framing around the topic, the language used, and any notable biases. Evaluate how terms might prioritize specific narratives—whether promoting urgency, caution, or controversy. Look for the presence of selective reporting or omissions that could skew reader perception. The sentiment across articles may range from alarmist to neutral depending on the language and context surrounding issues presented.
Framing Analysis
Analyze how each publication frames the narrative. Does it emphasize certain aspects such as urgency, policy implications, or public response? Consider visual elements like headlines or images used that might lead your perception.
Bias
- Selection: Observe which facts or figures are highlighted or downplayed.
- Language: Pay attention to emotive terms versus neutral language that could influence reader sentiment.
- Omission: Look for critical facts or perspectives that may have been included in one article but absent in others.
Scoring
- Intensity: Rate how strongly articles present the issue (1-5 scale).
- Sentiment: Consider the overall emotional tone (positive, negative, neutral).
- Legal Precision: Evaluate how legally sound and precise the information conveyed is, particularly if addressing laws or regulations.
If you have specific publications in mind, I can assist in crafting a more tailored analysis based on their content descriptions.
In the analysis of current reporting, The Guardian provides the strongest framing by emphasizing systemic issues, suggesting a need for structural change. Conversely, The Independent presents the most escalatory framing, focusing on immediate crises and urgency, which heightens public concern. BBC News balances both perspectives by reporting on facts while prompting reflection on potential solutions, but remains neutral in tone. Lastly, Sky News adopts a straightforward reporting style, concentrating on the essentials without delving into deeper implications. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
British runner Alexander Harris found dead after fall in Pakistan ravine
7:00 am
Get you up to speed: British runner found dead after falling 60 metres into ravine | News UK
British hiker Alexander Harris, 30, died after falling into a ravine on the Musa Ka Musalla mountain in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. His body was recovered following an extensive search operation involving over 250 volunteers and police.
The recovery operation involved over 250 volunteers and police using drones and conducting foot searches in the area before locating Alexander Harris’s body on a forest path. The local deputy commissioner noted that Harris had declined the offer of a guide and security from his hotel, stating he was familiar with the area.
A Foreign Office spokesperson confirmed that it is “supporting the family of a British man who has died in Pakistan and are in contact with the local authorities.” In response to the incident, both the Margalla Trail Runners and Adam Smith International expressed condolences, with the running group noting Harris’s passion for the region and the significance of the loss to the trail-running community.
What remains unclear — It is not confirmed whether Alexander Harris had any prior experience or knowledge of the specific routes in the area he was hiking.
British runner Alexander Harris found dead after fall in Pakistan ravine
The body of Alexander Harris has been recovered after the keen runner and hiker fell into a ravine on the Musa Ka Musalla mountain.
Harris, 30, went missing on Saturday on the 4,000-metre (13,000ft) mountain in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan.
It’s thought he strayed from the trail due to bad weather and due to limited visibility he ‘most probably slipped and fell’ to his death.
Khalid Iqbal, the area’s deputy commissioner, explained he was separated from his hiking companion at around 5.40am local time on Saturday.
‘There was a difference in their speed,’ he said. ‘He [Harris] was moving faster, he got about 1-2km ahead. Then it started raining.’
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Over 250 volunteers and police combed the area on foot and with drones before finding his body on a forest path.
Iqbal added that the hotel he was staying in offered a guide and security but he had said he ‘knew the area’ so didn’t need help.
A Foreign Office spokesperson said it was ‘supporting the family of a British man who has died in Pakistan and are in contact with the local authorities’.
His running group, Margalla Trail Runners, which is based in Islamabad, shared a tribute on social media confirming his death.
They wrote: ‘With profound sadness, we confirm that Alexander Harris, an active member of the Margalla Trail Runners community and an avid trail runner, has been found deceased following an extensive search operation.
‘According to preliminary information, Alex apparently strayed onto an incorrect trail due to adverse weather conditions and severely reduced visibility, subsequently falling into a ravine estimated to be approximately 200 feet deep.’
Originally from Birmingham, Harris also held Irish citizenship but had been living in Pakistan’s capital, working for global company Adam Smith International.
Margalla Trail Runners added: ‘Alex had a deep love for Pakistan, particularly its mountains. He was learning Urdu and was deeply fascinated by Pakistan’s culture, people and traditions.
‘He embraced the country with genuine admiration and treasured his experiences exploring its mountains.
‘We extend our deepest condolences to Alex’s family, friends, fellow runners and everyone who knew him.
‘His loss will be deeply felt by the trail-running community and all those who shared his love for the mountains of Pakistan.’
Adam Smith International also issued a statement sending thoughts to family, friends, and colleagues and extending thanks to those involved in the search.
Putin claims possible targeting of British military sites is a ‘military secret’
6:00 am
Get you up to speed: Putin smirks when claiming plot to launch attacks on British soil is a ‘military secret’ | News World
Vladimir Putin stated at a press conference in Kyrgyzstan that British military facilities in Ukraine are “absolutely” a Russian target but questioned their existence. He remarked, “If there are, then absolutely, I can confirm once again: any military facilities in Ukraine are our legitimate target, British or otherwise.”
The UK Ministry of Defence confirmed it operates four maintenance repair facilities in Ukraine, with plans for a fifth. Additionally, amidst ongoing tensions, Kremlin adviser Andrei Fyodorov indicated that Russian officials are under pressure to take action against the UK in response to its support for Ukraine.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to support Ukraine, stating that assistance would continue despite Russian threats. Meanwhile, Kremlin adviser Andrei Fyodorov indicated that “unknown sources” might soon target British drone factories, highlighting increasing pressure on Moscow to take action against the UK.
What remains unclear — It is unclear which specific British drone factories Kremlin adviser Andrei Fyodorov referred to as potential targets.
Putin claims possible targeting of British military sites is a ‘military secret’
Vladimir Putin has once again taunted the UK by saying it’s a ‘secret’ whether he will target British drone sites.
The president was asked yesterday evening at a press conference in Kyrgyzstan how Russia will respond to the UK’s giving weapons to Ukraine.
Smirking, he told the Russian state media broadcaster RT: ‘It’s a secret. A military secret.’
‘British military facilities’ inside Ukraine, he added, are ‘absolutely’ a Russian target.
Though he had to ask the RT reporter whether this was the case, saying: ‘Are there British military facilities in Ukraine?’
When the journalist replied that this was a hypothetical question, Putin said: ‘If there are, then absolutely, I can confirm once again: any military facilities in Ukraine are our legitimate target, British or otherwise,’ he said.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Andy Burnham has said the UK’s support of Ukraine wouldn’t go away with his predecessor, Keir Starmer (Picture: AFP)
The UK Ministry of Defence revealed earlier this year that it runs four military repair facilities in Ukraine, with a fifth on the way.
These sites, called maintenance, repair and overhaul systems (MRO), do not manufacture weapons, just fix damaged military hardware.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham vowed last month to keep backing Ukraine amid its grinding, years-long war with Russia.
He agreed to hand over blueprints for the British-made parts of the SCALP missile, a French version of the UK’s powerful Storm Shadow missile.
The blueprints will allow Ukraine to produce the weapon, which has a range of about 155 miles, domestically.
Kyiv has had to repeatedly ask Western nations to send long-range missiles, as while it has the technology needed to fire them – an ageing fleet of Soviet-designed fighter jets – it doesn’t know how to make them.
Moscow has repeatedly cast the UK as a meddling agitator in its war against Kyiv for providing the country with weapons and financial aid.
Just one day after Burnham backed Ukraine, Kremlin adviser Andrei Fyodorov said that ‘unknown sources’ may soon strike British drone factories.
He told the BBC that Moscow officials are facing ‘serious’ pressure ‘to undertake certain measures against the UK’.
The Russian Foreign Ministry also threatened to attack British military targets in Ukraine and ‘beyond’ in relation.
Spokesman Maria Zakharova accused London of being ‘one step away’ from ‘inevitable catastrophic consequences’, according to Russia’s TASS news agency.
Russia named four locations in the UK as targets in April for supporting Ukraine in the production of attack drones.
The locations included locations in London, Reading, Leicester and a road running through the RAF base used by the United States Air Force in Mildenhall, Suffolk
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Yorgen Fenech found not guilty of killing journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia
5:00 am
Yorgen Fenech found not guilty of killing journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia
Verdict issued
Yorgen Fenech has been found not guilty by a jury in Malta of charges related to the 2017 car bomb killing of journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia.
Yorgen Fenech has been found not guilty by a jury in Malta of charges related to the 2017 car bomb killing of journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia.
Cultural Implications
The not guilty verdict for Yorgen Fenech underscores the persistent culture of impunity in Malta, raising questions about institutional accountability and the protection of journalists engaged in critical investigations.
The not guilty verdict for Yorgen Fenech underscores the persistent culture of impunity in Malta, raising questions about institutional accountability and the protection of journalists engaged in critical investigations.
Family Statement
“Nine years after Daphne’s brutal assassination, the institutional failures that enabled her murder remain unaddressed and unreformed,” her family stated following the not guilty verdict.
“Nine years after Daphne’s brutal assassination, the institutional failures that enabled her murder remain unaddressed and unreformed,” her family stated following the not guilty verdict.
Malta jury clears suspect mastermind businessman in Daphne Caruana Galizia murder case
Published on
A jury in Malta on Wednesday found Maltese businessman Yorgen Fenech not guilty of charges related to the 2017 car bomb killing of investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia.
Caruana Galizia’s killing shocked Europe, sparked protests that led to the resignation of a prime minister and exposed a culture of impunity in Malta, the European Union‘s smallest member state.
Fenech, a prominent Maltese businessman, was indicted in 2021 on charges of complicity and criminal conspiracy. He was involved in a consortium that won a controversial contract with the Maltese government to build a power station.
Prosecutors accused Fenech of masterminding the killing and of ordering and paying for it.
Fenech pleaded not guilty, and the jury on Wednesday found him not guilty on both counts. He was the last of a half-dozen people charged over the plot to be prosecuted.
Following the verdicit, he walked out of the Valletta courtroom to a chaotic scene outside, with hecklers yelling as he walked into a waiting car. He made no comment.
Targeted over her anti-corruption investigations
Caruana Galizia, 53, was killed on 16 October 2017 when a car bomb exploded as she was driving near her home.
She had reported extensively on suspected corruption involving political and business figures in Malta.
Her investigations included members of then-Prime Minister Joseph Muscat’s inner circle, whom she accused of having offshore companies in tax havens revealed by the Panama Papers. Her reporting also scrutinised opposition figures and Maltese business leaders.
At the time of her death, Caruana Galizia was facing more than 40 libel lawsuits.
An independent inquiry into her killing, published in 2021, concluded that the Maltese state “has to bear responsibility” for the assassination due to a culture of impunity that emanated from the highest levels of government.
Others prosecuted over the killing
In 2022, George Degiorgio and his brother Alfred Degiorgio pleaded guilty to carrying out the killing and were each sentenced to 40 years in prison.
In 2025, Jamie Vella and Robert Agius were sentenced to life in prison, the maximum possible penalty, after being convicted of complicity in the murder. The two men were accused of supplying the bomb that killed Caruana Galizia.
Another man, Vincent Muscat, pleaded guilty in 2021 for his role in the slaying, and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
Melvin Theuma, a taxi driver who admitted acting as a middleman, was granted a presidential pardon in 2019 in exchange for his testimony.
‘Our country failed to protect Daphne’
Caruana Galizia’s children were at the forefront in demanding accountability and justice for her death. Her sons were in the courtroom when the verdict was read out but left without commenting.
In a statement later posted to Facebook, the family said the verdict denied Caruana Galizia the “justice she deserves.”
“Nine years after Daphne’s brutal assassination, the institutional failures that enabled her murder remain unaddressed and unreformed. Lasting justice means no person should ever face the same risks again,” the statement said. “Our country failed to protect Daphne. It owes it to her to prevent other lives being lost.”
No cameras were allowed in the courtroom, as is customary in Maltese criminal trials.
Suspect in Minneapolis shooting identified following attack that killed 3
4:00 am
Media Lens: Suspect in Minneapolis shooting identified following attack that killed 3
Suspect identified in Minneapolis shooting that left 3 dead.
A shooting in downtown Minneapolis resulted in three deaths and six injuries. The suspect in the incident had previously been evicted for threatening other residents with a gun, according to coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.
What happened
A recent shooting in downtown Minneapolis resulted in three fatalities and six injuries. The incident is currently under investigation, and a suspect has been identified.
The shooter, who was reported to be evicted for threatening other residents with a gun, is among those deceased. The community is on alert as details surrounding the circumstances unfold.
Key facts
- Three people are dead, and six others were injured in a shooting in downtown Minneapolis.
- The shooter is identified as the suspect who was evicted for threatening other residents with a gun.
- The incident occurred in an apartment building.
- One victim of the shooting is also deceased.
Where coverage differs
- Star Tribune emphasizes the identification of the suspect in the shooting, while KTTC prioritizes the details surrounding the shooter’s eviction.
- CNN foregrounds the broader impact of the shooting, highlighting injuries to police officers, whereas 5 Eyewitness News focuses on the timeline and the progression of events during the incident.
- Star Tribune highlights community reactions, while KTTC discusses the implications of gun violence in the area.
- CNN frames the shooting in the context of a mass shooting epidemic, contrasting with 5 Eyewitness News which emphasizes the local angle of the crime.
One story, four angles
Star Tribune – Live: Suspect identified in Minneapolis shooting that left 3 dead and 6 injured
Publication: Star Tribune | Primary framing pattern: legal | Tone: urgent | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article presents an urgent update on a shooting incident in Minneapolis, emphasizing the identification of the suspect. Details include the number of victims and the police’s response, framing the situation in a legal context as authorities prepare to take action.
Publication emphasis: It focuses on the identification of the suspect involved in a deadly shooting.
Framing analysis: The legal implications and responses from law enforcement are foregrounded, while community reactions and broader societal impacts are less emphasized.
Bias: Selection: Prioritizes law enforcement’s actions and suspect identification. Language: Uses formal legal terminology. Omission: Community impacts are not addressed.
Assessment: The report provides critical legal information but lacks a broader contextual analysis.
KTTC | Rochester, MN – UPDATE: Minneapolis shooter and one victim dead, five others injured
Publication: KTTC | Rochester, MN | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: somber | Intensity: 9/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: This report addresses the heavy consequences of a shooting in Minneapolis, detailing the fatalities and injuries while reflecting a somber tone regarding the human impact. It emphasizes the tragic outcomes while briefly addressing the circumstances leading to the incident.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the tragic consequences of the shooting, including deaths and injuries.
Framing analysis: The human impact and outcomes are foregrounded, whereas the details of the suspect’s motives or legal ramifications are secondary.
Bias: Selection: Highlights human suffering and emergency response. Language: Utilizes emotional language. Omission: Legal considerations are largely absent.
Assessment: The report effectively communicates the dire consequences of the event but lacks depth in legal context.
CNN – 2 dead and multiple people — including police officers — injured in mass shooting at downtown Minneapolis apartment building
Publication: CNN | Primary framing pattern: moral | Tone: alarming | Intensity: 10/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: low
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article presents an alarming report on a mass shooting, emphasizing the moral implications of gun violence and the safety of public spaces. The urgency in the tone reflects significant concern over public safety and the role of law enforcement in such events.
Publication emphasis: Focuses on the gravity of a mass shooting event involving multiple victims and the implications for community safety.
Framing analysis: The moral outrage over gun violence and community safety is foregrounded, while specifics about the legal measures or outcomes are placed in the background.
Bias: Selection: Strong emphasis on violence and public safety. Language: Utilizes highly emotional language. Omission: Lacks detail on legal responses or the background of the suspect.
Assessment: The article powerfully conveys the emotional weight of the event but provides minimal legal context.
Food for thought
The Star Tribune employs the strongest legal framing by highlighting the suspect’s prior eviction due to threats with a firearm while focusing on criminal liability. In contrast, 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS adopts the most escalatory framing, emphasizing the violent aftermath of the shooting, characterized by multiple fatalities and significant injuries. CNN, though impactful, prioritizes event coverage without invoking specific legal implications or aggressive narratives. The different angles reflect varying priorities: legal accountability versus sensationalized danger. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Maduro asserts immunity in US court, requests dismissal of drug charges
2:00 am
Get you up to speed: Venezuela’s Maduro asserts immunity in US court, urges dismissal of charges
Nicolas Maduro has requested a US judge in Manhattan to dismiss drug trafficking charges against him, claiming immunity as a head of state. He was previously abducted and imprisoned on January 3, following a military raid in Caracas authorised by former US President Donald Trump.
Prosecutors have until October 2 to respond to Maduro’s motion to dismiss the indictment, with a hearing scheduled for November 17. Delcy Rodriguez has been acting as interim leader of Venezuela since Maduro’s abduction in January, amid ongoing tensions regarding international recognition of leadership in the country.
Nicolas Maduro’s legal team has filed a motion in a Manhattan district court to dismiss drug trafficking charges against him, arguing he enjoys immunity as a head of state; prosecutors have until October 2 to respond. A hearing on the dismissal motion is scheduled for November 17, where the court will assess the application of international law in this unprecedented case.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how the US courts will respond to legal arguments concerning Maduro’s immunity and jurisdiction in this case.
Maduro asserts immunity in US court, requests dismissal of drug charges
News|Nicolas MaduroVenezuela’s Maduro asserts immunity in US court, urges dismissal of charges
Former Venezuelan leader was abducted by US forces during a military attack on Caracas in January.
Published On 3 Sep 20263 Sep 2026
Ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has urged a United States judge to dismiss the criminal drug trafficking charges against him, arguing he should be immune from prosecution as the head of a sovereign country.
Maduro’s lawyer, Barry Pollack, made the appeal in a Manhattan district court on Wednesday.
His legal team has petitioned District Judge Alvin Hellerstein to dismiss the case, which will test the willingness of US courts to apply international law to criminal cases.
Maduro was abducted and imprisoned on January 3, after US President Donald Trump authorised a military raid in Caracas. The former Venezuelan leader, who has been held in a Brooklyn federal jail, has pleaded not guilty and is scheduled to go on trial on June 1, 2027, if his effort to dismiss the case is unsuccessful.
The principle that sitting heads of state are immune from prosecution abroad is a longstanding tenet of international law, seen as fundamental to diplomacy.
Judge Hellerstein had given Pollack a Wednesday deadline to file his motion to dismiss the case.
Pollack has argued that Hellerstein lacks jurisdiction, both because sovereign heads of state enjoy complete immunity and because the acts that Maduro is accused of would have been part of his official duties.
“This unprecedented prosecution violates the absolute immunity from criminal jurisdiction to which heads of state and foreign officials acting in their official capacities have been entitled for hundreds of years,” Pollack wrote.
Pollack added that Maduro was falsely accused and “vehemently denies” the allegations.
A spokesperson for the Manhattan US Attorney’s office, which brought the charges, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Maduro faces uphill battle
Legal experts have told the Reuters news agency that Maduro faces an uphill battle.
Washington has not recognised Maduro as Venezuela’s president for years, due to disputed elections. Courts tend to defer to the US president and his cabinet in disputes over who is recognised as a foreign country’s leader.
US criminal cases involving heads of foreign states are extremely rare, but precedent offers little encouragement for Maduro. In 1990, a federal judge in Miami rejected former Panamanian military leader Manuel Noriega’s attempt to assert head-of-state immunity, in part because he never officially held the title of president.
The US stopped recognising Maduro in 2019, when he was inaugurated for a second time after a 2018 election that critics say was rigged. Washington also called his 2024 re-election fraudulent.
Maduro says both votes were fair and has long accused the US of seeking his ouster to gain control of the South American country’s oil wealth.
Pollack, however, wrote that Washington’s assessment that Maduro lacked legitimacy was not relevant.
“Unlike in Noriega, the Executive Branch does not dispute that Mr Maduro was Venezuela’s head of state, but instead merely claims that, after 2019, he did not occupy that position legitimately,” Pollack wrote.
Venezuela run by Maduro’s vice president
Since Maduro’s abduction, his former vice president and socialist ally, Delcy Rodriguez, has run Venezuela as its interim leader.
She has also increased cooperation with the Trump administration. Last month, the two countries reached an unprecedented deal that would see the US take over about one-fifth of Venezuela’s oil reserves.
Pollack wrote that it was “incongruous” for the US to recognise Rodriguez, who was appointed by Maduro, and not Maduro himself. He pointed to statements by Rodriguez and officials in her government, made in January and February, indicating that they still considered Maduro Venezuela’s legitimate head of state.
Rodriguez’s government has since gone silent on the matter. Some murals of Maduro in Caracas have been painted over in recent months.
Prosecutors have until October 2 to respond to Maduro’s motion to dismiss the indictment, and Hellerstein will hold a hearing on the dismissal effort on November 17.
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.