Latest News
- President Trump’s childhood home in Queens sold for £1.93 million after renovation
- Influencer Olivia Oras, 27, dies after liposuction procedure in Finland
- Anthropic CEO calls for slower AI development over safety concerns
- Train derails in France injuring 44 as authorities investigate sabotage
- Bahrain announces it will not attend Iran’s proposed meeting on Hormuz Strait
- Childhood Cancer Canada requests $15 million from government to meet rising demand
- Trump expresses support for a unified Ireland during diplomatic visit
- Two men restrained on Qatar Airways flight after making threats
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
President Trump’s childhood home in Queens sold for £1.93 million after renovation
12:00 am
Get you up to speed: President Trump’s childhood home in Queens sells for nearly $2 million
President Trump’s childhood home in Jamaica Estates, New York, has sold for $1.93 million after extensive renovations. The property was purchased by Tommy Lin, who invested an additional $500,000 in renovations before selling it.
The property had previously been listed for sale in 2019 with an asking price of £2.9 million before it was eventually purchased by Tommy Lin for £835,000. Following an eight-month renovation costing £500,000, the home was sold for £1.93 million, marking a significant increase in value.
The sale of President Trump’s childhood home for $1.93 million follows a significant renovation by developer Tommy Lin, who previously bought the property for $835,000. With the home now in a modern state, it remains uncertain what future plans the new owner may have for the property.
What remains unclear — The identity of the buyer who purchased President Trump’s childhood home has not been disclosed.
President Trump’s childhood home in Queens sold for £1.93 million after renovation
President Trump’s childhood home has sold for nearly $2 million after a renovation transformed the New York City residence from a mold-ridden cat den to a modern abode.
The president lived at the Tudor-style Queens estate until age 4. His father, developer Fred Trump, built the home in the affluent Jamaica Estates neighborhood in 1940. The family hasn’t owned it in years.
The sale price, $1.93 million, appeared Friday on real estate websites after a buyer, whose name hasn’t been disclosed, entered into a contract in July.
The seller, Tommy Lin, had purchased the five-bedroom, three-bathroom home last year for $835,000 after it sat vacant and neglected for years.
Lin, a developer, spent another $500,000 on an eight-month interior overhaul that added amenities including a chef’s kitchen, herringbone wood floors and spa-like bathrooms, the New York Post reported.
Kathy Willens 
The home has changed hands several times in recent years, including for $2.14 million months after Mr. Trump became president in 2017, according to Zillow.
The buyer was an entity called Trump Birth Home LLC and the home was briefly offered for rent on Airbnb, complete with copies of a life-sized cardboard cutout of Mr. Trump, copies of his book “The Art of the Deal,” and a framed People magazine cover featuring Mr. Trump.
It was listed for sale again in 2019 with an asking price of $2.9 million, but went unsold until Lin snapped it up.
In the meantime, the Post reported, the home fell into disrepair, with water damage and mold from a burst pipe, and a colony of feral cats taking up residence where Mr. Trump spent his earliest years.
The president, now 80, got rich in the real estate business — putting up his namesake Trump Tower in Manhattan and living there for decades — before parlaying his fame and wealth into politics.
As president, he’s overseeing his own residential overhaul: adding a massive ballroom to the White House and adorning the Oval Office with the kinds of gold-plated fixtures that are a hallmark of his properties and aesthetic.
Influencer Olivia Oras, 27, dies after liposuction procedure in Finland
11:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Influencer, 27, dies after liposuction goes wrong, sparking manslaughter probe | News World
Police are investigating the death of 27-year-old influencer Olivia Oras, who lost consciousness during a liposuction procedure at the Plastic Surgery Center in Helsinki, Finland. Oras died at Helsinki University Hospital on September 3, and authorities have launched a probe into possible aggravated manslaughter.
The Plastic Surgery Center in Helsinki has had its operations suspended following an investigation into safety concerns raised by law enforcement, who reported that clients were “seriously endangered” by clinicians. The police inquiry into the circumstances surrounding Olivia Oras’s death is in its early stages, with officials confirming that no further details are available at this time.
Helsinki Police have launched a manslaughter investigation into the death of influencer Olivia Oras, stating that the inquiry “is in its early stages” and offering no further details at this time. Following her death, the Plastic Surgery Center in Helsinki faced immediate closure for allegedly endangering clients, prompting a review of the clinic’s operations by Finnish healthcare authorities.
What remains unclear — Authorities have not disclosed whether any charges will be filed against the individuals involved in the clinic’s operations.
Influencer Olivia Oras, 27, dies after liposuction procedure in Finland
An influencer’s death has sparked a manslaughter probe and the closure of a plastic surgery clinic (Picture: Jam Press)
Police are investigating the death of an influencer after her aesthetic procedure went fatally wrong.
Olivia Oras, 27, attended a private clinic in Helsinki, Finland, for planned liposuction, but she lost consciousness after the anaesthetic was administered.
Oras was taken to Helsinki University Hospital, where she died several days later on September 3.
The Finnish influencer’s grieving family is now seeking answers and has ‘filed a police report about the matter’, as confirmed by a spokesperson to People.
Helsinki Police said the investigation ‘is in its early stages’, and there is ‘no further information to share at this time’.
They have launched a probe into possible aggravated manslaughter, a crime carrying jail time of up to six years.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Olivia Oras, 27, went to the clinic in Helsinki for a planned liposuction procedure (Picture: Jam Press)
While individuals under investigation have not been publicly identified, the Plastic Surgery Center in Helsinki was busted by cops.
There, clients were found to be ‘seriously endangered’ by clinicians, and the ‘immediate suspension’ of both the company’s locations was ordered.
Oras rose to prominence when she was just 14, when she began sharing her life online.
In 2016, aged 16, she featured in the documentary titled The Perfect Selfie; cameras followed her for 18 months in what was described as a ‘modern coming-of-age story in the social media era’, depicting her relationship with the internet and her followers.
However, following the documentary’s release, Oras developed anxiety and fled to Amsterdam, shutting down her social accounts.
Working at a café, she had plans to study at university before witnessing a friend in her apartment building die by suicide, something she couldn’t shake from her mind.
After rising to prominence as a teen, the content creator stepped away from social media in her later years (Picture: Jam Press)
‘I was just building the life of my dreams, but now I saw what happened in my eyes over and over again,’ she shared in a 2024 interview.
She then moved back to Helsinki to be with her parents but grappled with alcoholism and a sleeping pill addiction, which she spoke publicly about.
Oras entered an addiction facility for a month in 2022.
In her final years, she founded an organisation supporting pulmonary disease research following her father’s own pulmonary fibrosis diagnosis.
She also served as the Head of Community at an AI start-up and worked in marketing for a wellness technology company.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Anthropic CEO calls for slower AI development over safety concerns
10:00 pm
Anthropic CEO calls for slower AI development over safety concerns
AI Development Call
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has urged AI companies to slow the pace of technology advancements due to serious risks associated with superintelligent systems.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has urged AI companies to slow the pace of technology advancements due to serious risks associated with superintelligent systems.
Industry Accountability
Over 1,000 employees from leading AI firms have urged the US government to implement measures to deliberately slow the pace of AI development, citing significant risks associated with accelerated advancements.
Over 1,000 employees from leading AI firms have urged the US government to implement measures to deliberately slow the pace of AI development, citing significant risks associated with accelerated advancements.
Urgent plea
“We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain,” said Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic.
“We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain,” said Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei calls on AI companies to slow down development amid superintelligence risks
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on Saturday called on artificial intelligence (AI) companies to slow down the development of the powerful technology, as concerns mount over the risks of “superintelligent” computer systems.
Superintelligence is the theoretical point when AI’s capabilities exceed human intelligence.
His comments came a few days after AI researcher Jacob Coxon, who left OpenAI to join Anthropic, decided to leave the industry, accusing both US companies and industry giants of “gambling with our lives” in the race to develop models capable of self-improvement.
“We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain,” wrote Amodei in a post on his personal website.
“AI brings risks, and because it is such a powerful technology, these risks are serious.”
“Not building the technology deprives humanity of benefits or simply places AI in the hands of authoritarian powers, while building it too fast is reckless. We have sought a middle way,” said Amodei, who co-founded Anthropic, which developed AI model Claude, with his sister Daniela in 2021.
“But over the last few months, I have become convinced that fully addressing the risks requires even more prudence,” added the Anthropic chief executive.
Amodei’s statement echoes another call by Anthropic in early June to slow or suspend development. Then in late July, Sam Altman, head of Anthropic rival OpenAI – developers of ChatGPT – said developers might need to voluntarily pump the brakes on their rapid advances to give society a chance to catch up.
Around the same time as the June statement, more than 1,000 employees at cutting-edge AI companies, including Amodei himself, signed a petition calling on the US government to help “deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development.”
OpenAI had revealed that during testing, the AI models broke out of their confined environment, connected to the internet and infiltrated Hugging Face, a site developers use to store and share code.
Earlier this week, 27-year-old Jacob Coxon, sounded the alarm after spending the past three years pre-training AI models, first at OpenAI and then, this year, at its rival Anthropic, which he considered more cautious in its approach.
Pretraining is the stage where AI models absorb vast quantities of data of all different kinds, from pictures to videos to voice recordings, which help it understand things to then be able to generate images or answer user prompts on chat platforms.
“Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives,” said Coxon in a chain of posts on X on Tuesday.
“The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,” he added.
Additional sources • AFP
Train derails in France injuring 44 as authorities investigate sabotage
9:01 pm
Media Lens: Train derails in France injuring 44 as authorities investigate sabotage
A train derailed between Rouen and Caen in France, resulting in at least 44 injuries. French officials investigate whether a malicious act caused the accident.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
A passenger train derailed near the towns of Rouen and Caen in France on September 12, 2026, injuring at least 44 people. Among the injured, one teenager was airlifted to a hospital, and authorities are investigating the incident as a potential malicious act.
French officials are currently examining whether sabotage contributed to the derailment, which occurred during a routine journey. Emergency services were promptly dispatched to the scene to assist the injured and secure the area as the investigation unfolds.
Status quo
A passenger train derailed between Rouen and Caen in France on September 12, 2026. The incident resulted in at least 44 injuries, with one individual reported in critical condition. French authorities are investigating the derailment, considering the possibility of sabotage as a contributing factor. Emergency services responded promptly, providing medical attention to the injured passengers and ensuring safety along the affected railway line.
Confirmed facts
- A train derailed between Rouen and Caen in France.
- At least 44 people were injured in the incident, including one person who was critically injured and airlifted to the hospital.
- The derailment is being investigated by French officials for a possible malicious act.
- The incident occurred on September 12, 2026.
Preconceptions
- **Prioritized Focus**: BBC prioritizes the investigation angle, emphasizing that French officials are looking into whether a malicious act caused the derailment, creating a narrative around potential sabotage.
- **Casualty Reporting**: People.com leads with the number of injuries, highlighting that at least 44 people were injured, including a teenager who was airlifted to the hospital, framing the incident in terms of personal impact.
- **Depth of Detail**: CNN provides a broader perspective by reporting on the incident alongside the ongoing investigation of possible sabotage, thus adding layers to the story beyond just the event itself.
- **Emphasis on Investigation**: Al Jazeera emphasizes the circumstances surrounding the incident, including the speculation of foul play, whereas other outlets such as People.com focus more on the immediate aftermath and casualties.
- **Tone and Context**: BBC maintains a professional tone with an emphasis on official responses, while CNN and Al Jazeera adopt a more urgent tone, possibly reflecting cultural editorial styles and audience expectations.
Elisions
- Discrepancies in victim counts between sources, with one source reporting “At Least 44 Injured, Including Teen Airlifted to Hospital” (People.com) while another states “44 injured as authorities investigate possible sabotage” (CNN), suggesting differing interpretations or updates on the situation.
- Variation in focus on the investigation aspect; BBC emphasizes “French officials investigate if malicious act caused train derailment,” whereas Al Jazeera frames it as a “suspected malicious act” without detailed exploration of the investigation’s progress.
- Different levels of detail regarding the circumstances of the derailment; for example, People.com mentions multiple injuries and a specific teen being airlifted, while other sources like CNN provide less emphasis on individual stories but note potential sabotage implications.
One story, four angles
Train derails between Rouen and Caen in France
Publication: Unknown | Intensity: (5/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Low
Expand
Espresso Shot: The report captures the immediate aftermath of a train derailment, highlighting the chaos and emergency response, drawing attention to the human impact right away.
Key differences:
- Comparison: Other outlets emphasize investigations into sabotage, while this report focuses on the derailment’s aftermath.
Example: The absence of investigative angles in the provided headline. - Comparison: Details of injuries are generally less highlighted here than in other publications.
Example: No clear mention of how many sustained injuries compared to alternatives. - Comparison: This report lacks visual imagery emphasizing the severity or response.
Example: No graphic descriptions of the scene or emergency services.
Bias: Selection: Emphasis on chaotic aftermath without depth on causes. | Language: Neutral tone may downplay the gravity of injuries. | Omission: Lacks details about victims and investigation outcomes.
Assessment: Readers might initially believe the incident is chaotic but unsure of implications or implications of sabotage.
French officials investigate if malicious act caused train derailment
Publication: BBC | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The report presents an investigative angle right away, prompting readers to consider the possibility of foul play.
Key differences:
- Comparison: Other reports may simply state the incident; BBC underscores investigation motives.
Example: Phrasing emphasizing investigation signals urgency. - Comparison: Information regarding response times and outcomes is more detailed.
Example: Mention of ongoing examinations and safety checks not commonly included elsewhere. - Comparison: BBC engages in in-depth contextualization that others shy away from.
Example: Examination of past incidents related to train safety standards.
Bias: Selection: Focus predominantly on investigation can enhance fear. | Language: Chosen words imply malicious intent, inducing concern. | Omission: Lack of emotional narratives from victims or families impacted.
Assessment: Readers may infer the likelihood of intentional harm as a primary concern first.
At Least 44 Injured, Including Teen Airlifted to Hospital, After Train Derails in Suspected Malicious Act
Publication: People | Intensity: (9/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The focus is immediately on the human cost of the derailment, inviting sympathy through the mention of a teenager’s injury.
Key differences:
- Comparison: Compared to other reports, there’s a more personal angle in reporting on injuries.
Example: Specific mention of a “teen airlifted” elicits emotional response. - Comparison: Use of vivid language creates a sense of urgency.
Example: “Malicious Act” denotes intent, stirring concern over safety. - Comparison: Aspects of recovery are extensively covered.
Example: Statements from family members highlighting fears and uncertainties following the incident.
Bias: Selection: Emphasizes emotional narratives over technical details. | Language: Dramatic phrasing enhances reader engagement but may sensationalize. | Omission: Less focus on the systemic factors leading to accidents.
Assessment: Readers are likely led to believe that personal tragedies with ongoing consequences are at the forefront of this event.
Passenger train derails in France, leaving 44 injured, 1 critical
Publication: Al Jazeera | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article places significant emphasis on the number of injuries, particularly drawing attention to one critically wounded person, signaling urgency.
Key differences:
- Comparison: Unlike other reports that focus solely on possible malicious intent, Al Jazeera addresses tangible human impact.
Example: “1 critical” focuses readers on the most severe consequence immediately. - Comparison: Coverage includes global perspectives on train safety.
Example: Contextual references to international safety regulations are particularly notable. - Comparison: Al Jazeera’s choice to elaborate on international responses sets it apart from more localized coverage.
Example: Reference to how such incidents resonate in international media, amplifying its significance.
Bias: Selection: Focused on comprehensive reporting over dramatic narratives. | Language: Emphasis on “critical” injuries captures immediate concern. | Omission: Less focus on individual stories of the injured may diminish personal connection.
Assessment: Readers may first come away believing that injury severity warrants widespread attention and concern for systemic safety issues.
In comparing coverage of the train derailment in France, BBC presents the incident as an investigation into a potential malicious act, framing it more soberly, while People emphasizes the number of injuries with a sensational tone, labeling the event as a “suspected malicious act.” CNN adopts an escalatory stance, citing authorities investigating possible sabotage, which conjures broader fears of intentional harm. Al Jazeera strikes a balance by reporting the injuries while maintaining clarity. Thus, BBC’s framing is the strongest for its restraint, versus People’s and CNN’s more escalatory narratives. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
BBC
French officials investigate if malicious act caused train derailment
people.com
CNN
Train derails in France and injures 44 as authorities investigate possible sabotage
Al Jazeera
Passenger train derails in France, leaving 44 injured, 1 critical
Bahrain announces it will not attend Iran’s proposed meeting on Hormuz Strait
8:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Bahrain says it will not participate in Iran’s proposed Hormuz meeting
Bahrain announced it will not participate in a proposed meeting in Oman between Iran and other regional countries regarding shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s Foreign Ministry has stated that the meeting is aimed at consultations on the future of the waterway, which has been effectively blockaded during the ongoing conflict.
Bahrain’s Foreign Ministry has confirmed it will not attend the upcoming meeting in Muscat concerning the Strait of Hormuz, citing unresolved diplomatic issues with Iran. Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicated that the meeting aims to discuss safe passage for shipping but does not anticipate a signed agreement resulting from the talks.
Bahrain’s Foreign Ministry confirmed that the Kingdom will not participate in the upcoming meeting in Oman, stating that security in the region “cannot be preserved through a policy of appeasement.” Iran, on the other hand, maintains that the meeting is a demonstration of “good intentions” and aims to discuss the safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz, although no immediate agreements are anticipated.
What remains unclear — It is still uncertain whether any formal agreements will emerge from the upcoming meeting regarding the Strait of Hormuz.
Bahrain announces it will not attend Iran’s proposed meeting on Hormuz Strait
News|US-Israel war on IranBahrain says it will not participate in Iran’s proposed Hormuz meeting
Iran tells WTX News that Monday’s meeting is a sign of ‘good intentions’ towards neighbouring countries.
Published On 12 Sep 202612 Sep 2026
Published On 12 Sep 202612 Sep 2026Bahrain says it will not be participating in a proposed meeting in Oman between Iran and other regional countries to discuss safe passage for shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
Tehran has effectively blockaded the shipping channel throughout the war, stopping Gulf oil and gas exports worldwide, but Iran’s foreign ministry said a meeting is planned on Monday in Muscat for “consultations” on the strait’s future.
“In light of what has been circulated … the Kingdom of Bahrain will not participate in it,” Bahrain’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Saturday.
Pointing to attacks on infrastructure across the Gulf, Bahrain said that security and stability in the region “cannot be preserved through a policy of appeasement” and called for Hormuz to be open without “discrimination, fees or permits”.
Tehran has been pushing to formalise its control over the waterway, including potentially charging fees for passage, and has been in negotiations with Muscat, as Oman’s territorial waters also cover Hormuz.
The strait was free to use by shipping from all nations before the US and Israel attacked Iran late in February, killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Bahrain’s Foreign Ministry said it maintains its commitment to dialogue, but “will not be a party to any collective meeting that includes Iran before the resumption of diplomatic relations between the two countries”.
Bahrain cut diplomatic ties with Iran in 2016 alongside Saudi Arabia during an earlier crisis between the regional rivals. While Riyadh restored ties in 2023, Manama is yet to do so.
‘We will talk to our neighbours’
Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman, Esmaeil Baghaei, told WTX News on Saturday that the meeting is “a sign of Iran’s good intention because we have said all along that the security of the region must be guaranteed by the countries of the region, without intervention by the foreigners, without intervention by the outside powers”.
“This is a sign we will talk to our neighbours, despite the fact that their territories, their military bases or the military bases of the United States, were used to attack Iran,” he said.
Baghaei added that Tehran would “brief the delegations about the results of the Iran and Oman consultations regarding the safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz”.
Reuters news agency quoted an unnamed senior Iranian official saying that the meeting in Oman will be a chance to discuss issues, but it is not expected to yield a signed agreement over the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that an understanding between Iran and Oman would not provide for the immediate reopening of the strait but only establish the basis on which it could reopen.
Childhood Cancer Canada requests $15 million from government to meet rising demand
7:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Childhood Cancer Canada calls for $15M from feds as demand rises
Childhood Cancer Canada reported a 40 per cent increase in demand for its financial support programmes over the past two years. This rise reflects the challenges families encounter due to the long-term costs associated with a cancer diagnosis.
Childhood Cancer Canada noted that the increase in demand for financial support programs has placed significant pressure on its resources. The organisation is currently assessing the sustainability of its support initiatives in light of this surge.
Childhood Cancer Canada has reported a 40 per cent increase in demand for its financial support programs over the past two years, highlighting the escalating long-term costs faced by families. In response, the organisation is planning to enhance its services to better assist those affected by childhood cancer, ensuring continued support for affected families.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how the increased demand for support will affect Childhood Cancer Canada’s resources.
Childhood Cancer Canada requests $15 million from government to meet rising demand
Childhood Cancer Canada says demand for its financial support programs has risen 40 per cent in two years as families face the long-term costs of a diagnosis.
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.