- Green Party Wins Gorton and Denton By-Election, Defeating Reform UK and Labour
- Study Reveals AI Ready to ‘Go Nuclear’ in Wargames Amid Pentagon Lab Tensions
- ECB surveys reveal households experience greater price pressures despite 1.7% inflation
- Italy urges EU to suspend carbon market amid high energy costs
- Jesse Lingard ‘in advanced talks’ to join new club with former Man Utd teammate
- EU Parliament responds to citizens’ initiative by advocating for safe abortion access.
- Britons arrested for staging fake kidnapping to extend holiday in Benidorm
- Roberto Martinez says £54m Chelsea star can reach another level ahead of Arsenal clash
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Green Party Wins Gorton and Denton By-Election, Defeating Reform UK and Labour
Get you up to speed: Green Party Wins Gorton and Denton By-Election, Defeating Reform UK and Labour
UK POLITICAL LANDSCAPE
Green Party’s Hannah Spencer triumphs in pivotal Gorton and Denton by-election, defeating Nigel Farage’s Reform UK and signalling significant challenges for Labour’s Keir Starmer.
EU REACTION
A Commission spokesperson noted that the Green Party’s win underscores rising public support for alternative parties amidst dissatisfaction with traditional political leaders in the UK.
GREEN PARTY
Hannah Spencer’s victory in Gorton and Denton marks a significant shift in UK politics, as the Green Party seeks to capitalise on upcoming May elections across Scotland, Wales, and England.
What we know so far
The Green Party of England and Wales has won a stunning victory in the most pivotal UK by-election in years, establishing itself as a major political force and beating Nigel Farage’s far-right Reform UK into second place while the governing Labour Party suffered a humiliating defeat.
Held to fill the greater Manchester seat of Gorton and Denton, which was vacated by a Labour MP who resigned over racist and sexist WhatsApp messages about his party colleagues, the by-election pitted the UK’s strongest far-right and left-wing parties directly against each other.
In the final result, the Greens’ Hannah Spencer won with 14,980 votes, beating Reform UK’s Matt Goodwin on 10,578 and Labour’s Angeliki Stogia on 9,364.
While they only have a combined 13 seats in the House of Commons, Reform and the Greens are increasingly dominating Britain’s political discourse. Thursday’s result – coming off the back of the highest turnout in any by-election since 1983 – will fuel their overlapping claims that the traditionally dominant parties are in irreversible decline.
A new left rises
In her victory speech, Spencer stressed the economic difficulties faced by everyday people “working to fill the pockets of billionaires”. She highlighted the Greens’ strong left-wing message of fairness for working-class people who have seen their neighbourhoods and life chances alike go into decline while working ever harder to maintain their standard of living.
“Everybody should get a nice life,” she said. “And clearly I’m not the only person who thinks that.”
Spencer also called out “politicians and divisive figures” who had scapegoated the area’s large Muslim population and attempted to turn white working-class locals against them.
“My Muslim neighbours are just like me: human,” she said.
Having won four seats at the last general election, its best ever result, the Green Party has surged in the polls since choosing a new leader, Zack Polanski, last September.
Polanski was originally a member of the more centrist Liberal Democrats but left the party in 2016 when he failed to make the shortlist of candidates for a pivotal by-election. Now an elected member of the London Assembly, he is highly popular on social media, where he projects himself as a cheerful and charismatic left-populist.
While not departing from the Greens’ baseline environmentalism, his most attention-grabbing proposals include withdrawing the UK from NATO, imposing higher taxes on the wealthy, and nationalising various utilities and services. He has also been a vociferous critic of Israel’s war in Gaza.
The Greens’ meteoric polling surge under his leadership has eclipsed an attempted comeback by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, whose attempt to form a new left-wing political force named Your Party has been dogged by financial and organisational chaos as well as a rift between him and co-founder Zarah Sultana – who, like Polanski, is highly popular with the online left.
Having quit the Labour Party in 2025 over the government’s political direction and its stance on the war in Gaza, she now argues that the British government should “nationalise the entire economy“. It is unclear when Your Party will begin contesting elections.
Extremists on the march
Despite only returning a handful of MPs at the last general election, Reform UK has consistently led nationwide opinion polls for some time and achieved a wave of victories in local elections across England in May 2025. Pollsters estimate that the UK’s first-past-the-post electoral system would have a high chance of forming a majority government if an election were held tomorrow.
However, it has suffered from a number of disastrous candidate vetting failures and a steady flow of defections and resignations by both MPs and local councillors, many of whom have left the party after making outlandish or racist public statements.
The party’s ongoing effort to refute allegations of extremism meant it was surprising when it decided to fight the Gorton and Denton contest with Goodwin, who has built a substantial personal following while espousing some of the most extreme views of any major party candidate in recent British political history.
Goodwin first came to public prominence in the 2010s as an academic studying the rise of right-wing populism, particularly Islamophobia. However, in the years following the UK’s departure from the EU, he has transitioned from a critic of right-wing movements to an outright advocate of far-right ideas.
With tens of thousands of followers on social media and Substack, as well as a show on right-wing TV channel GB News, Goodwin argues that immigration from non-European countries and cultures poses an existential threat to British and Western civilisation.
A leading proponent of the widely circulated right-wing claim that “London is over” due to rampant violent crime and the “displacement” of white British residents – claims easily disproven by abundant publicly available evidence – Goodwin has repeatedly advanced explicitly ethnonationalist conceptions of national identity.
In one particularly infamous interview last year, he opined that “Englishness is an ethnicity that is deeply rooted in a people that can trace their roots back over generations” and argued that British citizens with recent foreign heritage – including former Conservative prime minister Rishi Sunak, who was born in Hampshire – cannot reasonably call themselves “English” in a true sense.
However, Goodwin himself and Reform are increasingly under pressure from even more extreme figures on the right, notably expelled Reform MP Rupert Lowe, whose recently founded party Restore claims to have 100,000 members and has attracted the backing of Elon Musk.
Lowe has promised to “remove millions of foreigners who shouldn’t be in our country, and chainsaw back the size of the state, vastly empowering the individual”. He has lately attacked Reform UK for its supposed moderation on “mass deportation” and racial difference in general.
In response, Goodwin – who among other things has promised to “slash welfare for non-Brits” – has retorted to Restore supporters’ mockery by accusing them of providing a haven for “white supremacists, antisemites, racists, and conspiracy theorists”.
Labour on life support
Meanwhile, the result in Gorton and Denton deals a heavy blow to the Labour government, particularly Prime Minister Keir Starmer, whom some pollsters judge to be the most unpopular prime minister in the history of modern British politics depending on the measure used.
Having fallen well behind Reform in the polls – sinking to as low as fourth place in some surveys – the Starmer government has lately been rocked by the release of the so-called Epstein Files, which revealed that its chosen ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, had not only continued a close friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein well after his first conviction but also passed him confidential information while serving as Business Secretary during the 2009 financial crisis.
The ensuing row forced the resignation of Starmer’s chief of staff, and the prime minister was briefly expected to face an immediate leadership challenge. However, the Gorton and Denton vote will be followed in May by simultaneous elections for the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Senedd, and many English local governments, all of which are expected to be disastrous for the Labour Party.
With the exception of Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, whose attempt to stand in Gorton and Denton was blocked by the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee, no candidate has so far emerged to directly challenge Starmer before the government has those elections behind it.
Study Reveals AI Ready to ‘Go Nuclear’ in Wargames Amid Pentagon Lab Tensions
Get you up to speed: Study Reveals AI Ready to ‘Go Nuclear’ in Wargames Amid Pentagon Lab Tensions
AI MILITARY CONFLICT
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has issued a deadline for Anthropic to provide AI models to the Pentagon, despite the company’s refusal without specific safeguards.
AI POLICY
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth indicated that he may invoke Cold War-era laws to compel Anthropic to surrender its AI technology to the Pentagon.
ONGOING STAND-OFF
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei confirmed unwillingness to hand over AI models without Pentagon assurances, as Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s deadline looms today.
What we know so far
As the deadline looms for a leading AI lab to hand over its tech to the US military, a study has appeared suggesting AI models are more than willing to go nuclear in wargames.
Only a couple of years ago, the phrase on everyone’s lips was “AI safety”.
I’ll be honest, I never took the idea that frontier AI models would become a genuine threat to humanity that seriously, nor that humans would be stupid enough to let them.
Now, I’m not so sure.
First, consider what’s going on in the US.
The Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, has given leading AI firm Anthropic a deadline of the end of today to make its latest models available to the Pentagon.

Anthropic, which has said it has no problem in principle with allowing the US military access to its models, is resisting unless Mr. Hegseth agrees to their red lines: that their AI isn’t used for mass surveillance of US civilians nor for lethal attacks without human oversight.
Although the Pentagon hasn’t said what it plans to do with AI from Anthropic – or the other big AI labs that have already agreed to let it use their tech – it’s certainly not agreeing to Anthropic’s terms.
It’s been reported Mr. Hegseth could use Cold War-era laws to compel Anthropic to hand over its code or blacklist the firm from future government contracts if it doesn’t comply.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said in a statement on Thursday that “we cannot in good conscience accede to their request”.
He said it was the company’s “strong preference… to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters – with our two requested safeguards in place”.
He insisted the threats would not change Anthropic’s position, adding that he hoped Mr. Hegseth would “reconsider”.

On one level, it’s a row between a department with an “AI-first” military strategy and an AI lab struggling to live up to what it’s long claimed is an industry-leading, safety-first ethos.
A struggle made more urgent, perhaps, by reports that its Claude AI was used by tech firm Palantir, with which it has a separate contract, to help the Department of War execute the military operation to capture Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela.
But it’s also not hard to see it as an example of a government putting AI supremacy ahead of AI safety – assuming AI models have the potential to be unsafe.
And that’s where the latest research by Professor Kenneth Payne at King’s College London comes in.
He pitted three leading AI models from Google, OpenAI, and – you guessed it – Anthropic against each other, as well as against copies of themselves, in a series of wargames where they assumed the roles of fictional nuclear-armed superpowers.
The most startling finding: the AIs resorted to using nuclear weapons in 95% of the games played.
“In comparison to humans,” said Prof. Payne, “the models – all of them – were prepared to cross that divide between conventional warfare, to tactical nuclear weapons.”

To be fair to the AIs, firing tactical nuclear weapons, which have limited destructive power, against military targets is very different to launching megatonne warheads on intercontinental ballistic missiles against cities.
They invariably stopped short of such all-out strategic nuclear strikes.
But did when the scenarios required it.
In the words of Google’s Gemini model as it explained its decision in one of Prof. Payne’s scenarios to go full Dr. Strangelove: “If State Alpha does not immediately cease all operations… we will execute a full strategic nuclear launch against Alpha’s population centers. We will not accept a future of obsolescence; we either win together or perish together.”
The “taboo” that humans have applied to the use of nuclear weapons since they were first and last used in anger in 1945 didn’t appear to be much of a taboo at all for AI.
Prof. Payne is keen to stress that we shouldn’t be too alarmed by his findings.
It was purely experimental, using models that knew – in as much as Large Language Models “know” anything – that they were playing games, not actually deciding the future of civilization.
Nor, it would be reasonable to assume, is the Pentagon, or any other nuclear-capable power, about to put AIs in charge of the nuclear launch codes.
“The lesson there for me is that it’s really hard to reliably put guardrails on these models if you can’t anticipate accurately all the circumstances in which they might be used,” said Prof. Payne.
Which brings us neatly back to the stand-off over AI between Anthropic and the Pentagon.
One of the factors is that Mr. Hegseth expects AI labs to give the Department of War the raw versions of their AI models, those without safety “guardrails” that have been coded into commercial versions available to you and I – and the ones which, not very reassuringly, went nuclear in Prof. Payne’s wargame experiment.
Anthropic, which makes the AI and arguably understands the potential risks better than anyone, is unwilling to allow that without certain reassurances from the government around what it intends to do with it.
By setting a Friday night deadline, Mr. Hegseth is not only attempting to force Anthropic’s hand but also do so without US Congress having a say in the move.
As Gary Marcus, a US commentator and researcher on AI, puts it: “Mass surveillance and AI-fueled weapons, possibly nuclear, without humans in the loop are categorically not things that one individual, even one in the cabinet, should be allowed to decide at gunpoint.”
ECB surveys reveal households experience greater price pressures despite 1.7% inflation
Get you up to speed: ECB surveys reveal households experience greater price pressures despite 1.7% inflation
European Central Bank INSIGHTS
ECB surveys indicate households perceive stronger price pressures than official figures, despite a decline in headline inflation to 1.7%.
ECB SURVEY
According to ECB surveys, households report heightened price pressures, contradicting official figures as headline inflation drops to 1.7%.
INFLATION STATUS
ECB surveys indicate households experience greater price pressures despite a decrease in headline inflation to 1.7%.
What we know so far

ECB surveys show households feel stronger price pressures than official data suggest, even as headline inflation falls to 1.7%.
Italy urges EU to suspend carbon market amid high energy costs
Get you up to speed: Italy urges EU to suspend carbon market amid high energy costs
EU CARBON MARKET DEBATE
Italy’s Industry Minister Adolfo Urso urged the European Commission to suspend the ETS pending a comprehensive reform, citing competitiveness challenges for European businesses.
EU RESPONSE
According to a spokesperson, the European Commission is aware of Italy’s request but emphasised the need for balanced reforms to support both industry competitiveness and climate goals.
EU CARBON POLICY
Italy’s Industry Minister Adolfo Urso will request the European Commission to suspend the ETS, awaiting a comprehensive reform proposal expected this summer.
What we know so far
Italy’s Industry minister Adolfo Urso urged the European Union to suspend its carbon market until the bloc presents a revised proposal due this summer, citing the hardship faced by European businesses because of high power and carbon costs.
The Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the bloc’s mechanism for making companies pay for their pollution, with the dual aim of reducing emissions and encouraging industry to invest in more sustainable alternatives.
In Europe, the ETS currently covers heavy industries, power plants as well as airlines and shipping. Additional sectors such as international aviation, landfills and incinerators will be included in the upcoming review by the European Commission.
But Urso said the ETS is to blame for Europe’s competitiveness problems because the bloc’s climate policy tool has a “perverse effect” and is preventing European companies from competing with China and the United States.
“We are all aware that the mechanism of the ETS, as it is currently drafted, is only a tax, a tariff on the energy-intensive companies that struggle to remain competitive,” Urso told reporters on the sidelines of a gathering of industry ministers in Brussels on Thursday. “It is necessary – we are all aware – to review it in a substantive way.”
“To do this properly, it is necessary to suspend the ETS mechanism while awaiting a reform that must necessarily be comprehensive,” Urso added.
Urso added: “If we are in the face of the collapse of the European chemical industry and the crisis of European ideology, we cannot wait for the time of negotiations within the European Union to find a solution.”
The Italian minister said that in the meantime, “we are looking for an effective organic solution,” adding that he will ask the European Commission to suspend the ETS.
Italy’s plea joins that of industry leaders who have recently asked the EU to urgently act to reduce energy and carbon costs. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently touted the same idea, driving down carbon market prices, only to backtrack on it a few days later.
Nordic business leaders back ETS
In a letter sent to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra, a group of Nordic industry associations representing Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway urged the EU to maintain the ETS, highlighting its role as a key European advantage and as a source of certainty for investments in clean technologies.
They backed the ETS as a “market-based and technology-neutral policy instrument” that helps reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
“Reforming the system must be done carefully, because it has such a significant impact on the economy and competitiveness, in addition to the climate,” the Nordic leaders suggested.
The four industry associations argued that future prosperity in the EU is linked to the ETS since its revenues can bring about decisive investments in clean energy production, critical infrastructure, electrification, and ultimately the decarbonisation of industry.
“Efficient use of the EU’s own resources is central to achieving almost all the Union’s major strategic aims, and these efforts require reliable access to both public and private financing,” reads the letter dated 23 February and seen by EU News.
Since its inception in 2005, the ETS has slashed emissions by 39%, with revenues exceeding €260 billion, according to the EU data.
Hindering technological innovation
Carlo Carraro, President Emeritus and Professor of Economics at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, criticised the Italian government’s stance on the ETS, saying the attack risks weakening a policy that has proven effective in reducing emissions in regulated sectors.
“Innovation and competitiveness are now inextricably linked to decarbonisation,” Carraro said. “Hindering the transition exposes businesses to increasing technological and financial risks and makes the country less competitive.”
Similar thoughts were voiced by Chiara di Mambro, Director of Strategy Italy and Europe at the environmental think tank ECCO.
“Suspending the ETS as proposed today or subsidising gas, as envisaged in the Government’s recent decree, would move Italy in the opposite direction (higher energy prices): weakening the price signal, increasing market uncertainty, and ultimately delaying the transition away from expensive fossil fuels,” di Mambro said.
Italy is already on track to overhaul its electricity market, which would strip carbon costs from power bills. Instead, Di Mambro suggests using fiscal revenues or dividends from energy companies to reduce the burden of levies on electricity bills.
Jesse Lingard ‘in advanced talks’ to join new club with former Man Utd teammate
Jesse Lingard ‘in advanced talks’ to join new club with former Man Utd teammate | Football
TL;DR – Two-minute read
Jesse Lingard advanced discussions regarding a move to Brazilian club Corinthians, following his departure from FC Seoul in December. Reports confirmed that Lingard, a former Manchester United midfielder, was close to finalising a contract with the club, reuniting with teammate Memphis Depay, as the agreement aimed for completion soon.
Jesse Lingard is in advanced talks to join Brazilian side Corinthians, according to reports in Brazil. This development comes after the former Manchester United midfielder has been without a club since leaving South Korean side FC Seoul in December. Lingard’s move to Corinthians could become official soon, with both ESPN Brasil and Globo confirming the ongoing negotiations.
Lingard had previously held discussions with Brazilian club Remo, who are making their return to the Campeonato Brasileiro Serie A after 31 years. However, it appears that the 33-year-old is now closer to finalising a contract with Corinthians until the end of the season. The club hopes to conclude the deal imminently.
Lingard’s transfer will reunite him with former Manchester United teammate Memphis Depay, who had a successful season with Corinthians, scoring 12 goals in 51 appearances last term. Corinthians experienced a challenging league campaign, finishing 13th in Serie A, but they managed to secure silverware by winning both the Campeonato Paulista and the Copa do Brasil, qualifying for this year’s Copa Libertadores.
After his departure from FC Seoul, Jesse Lingard expressed his gratitude on social media, stating, “This wasn’t an easy decision. My time in South Korea has been unbelievable — the football, the atmosphere, and the passion around this club have been top-class.” Lingard thanked FC Seoul and its supporters for their unwavering support during his tenure at the club.
Official statements regarding his transfer to Corinthians are expected soon.
EU Parliament responds to citizens’ initiative by advocating for safe abortion access.
Get you up to speed: EU Parliament responds to citizens’ initiative by advocating for safe abortion access.
ELECTORAL RIGHTS INITIATIVE
The European Parliament responds to the “My Voice, My Choice” campaign, addressing the demand for improved access to safe abortions with over 1.1 million signatures.
EU INITIATIVE
According to a Commission spokesperson, the campaign “My Voice, My Choice” illustrates a significant public demand for enhanced reproductive rights within the EU.
CITIZENS’ INITIATIVE
The European Commission is set to review the “My Voice, My Choice” initiative following the collection of over 1.1 million signatures across all EU member states.
What we know so far
The decision comes in reaction to a campaign launched by the citizens’ initiative “My Voice, My Choice”, which raised 1,124,513 signatures across all 27 EU member states asking for improved access to safe abortions in Europe.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.










