- Comey requests dismissal of indictment over Instagram post, citing First Amendment rights
- Remains of stillborn baby left on funeral home’s floor for two years
- Wildfire nears Bordeaux as emergency measures are implemented in France
- Us president trump renews threats against eu-us trade deal on anniversary
- Iran Accuses Ukraine of Deadly Attack on Vessel in Caspian Sea
- Sam Altman declares AI has reached singularity, raising concerns about control
- Wildfires near Clinton, B.C. merge, covering nearly 670 square kilometres
- CBS News poll shows strong disapproval of Trump on economy and Iran
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Comey requests dismissal of indictment over Instagram post, citing First Amendment rights
Get you up to speed: Comey asks judge to drop case over seashells Instagram post, arguing speech is protected by First Amendment
Former FBI Director James Comey is challenging an indictment from a federal grand jury alleging he threatened President Trump’s life through an Instagram post. Comey’s lawyers argue that the charges violate the First Amendment, asserting that the phrase “86 47” does not imply violence.
Former FBI Director James Comey is scheduled to be arraigned in late September. He has filed motions seeking to dismiss the charges against him, asserting that the prosecution is both selective and vindictive.
Former FBI Director James Comey’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against him, arguing that it infringes on protected speech under the First Amendment and that the phrase “86 47” does not indicate a threat. Comey is set to be arraigned in late September and intends to pursue multiple motions to dismiss the charges on various grounds, citing potential selective prosecution.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how the court will rule on Comey’s motions to dismiss the charges against him.
Comey requests dismissal of indictment over Instagram post, citing First Amendment rights
Washington — Former FBI Director James Comey urged a federal judge on Monday to throw out an indictment alleging he threatened President Trump’s life, arguing that it targets speech protected by the First Amendment and that the phrase at the center of the charges, “86 47,” does not connote violence.
Lawyers for Comey wrote in their motion to dismiss the case that the indictment returned by a federal grand jury earlier this year “targets and chills” political speech. The First Amendment, they wrote, prohibits the government from using criminal prosecution to punish a political opponent.
“Forcing Mr. Comey to stand trial for a statement opposing the President — even if he is ultimately acquitted — would itself be an unconstitutional punishment of free speech,” Comey’s defense team wrote. “And it would invite future prosecutions by the Executive Branch against perceived political enemies for their opposition to the President.”
They argued that the indictment against Comey should be dismissed because it does not allege he made a true threat against Mr. Trump.
Comey faces two charges of threatening to kill the president, which stem from a photo he briefly posted to his Instagram account last year that showed seashells arranged in the sand to form the numbers “86 47.”
Prosecutors claim that a “reasonable recipient” would interpret the depiction of the shells “as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to President Trump.”
Comey deleted the image soon after he shared it and said at the time that he believed the shell formation was communicating a political message. He said in May 2025 that he didn’t realize that the numbers may be associated with violence and took the post down because “I oppose violence of any kind.”
The former FBI director is set to be arraigned in late September and has proclaimed he is innocent of the charges.
Comey is expected to file several motions seeking to have the charges against him dismissed on a variety of grounds, including that the prosecution against him is selective and vindictive.
In their first filing raising First Amendment issues with the indictment, his lawyers said that the phrase “86” means “to get rid of” or “eject,” and “has no violent connotation except in the most uncommon usages.” The defense team cited several other instances where the phrase “86” has been used, including by former Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida in response to the removal of several GOP leaders from their roles.
But even if Comey’s post is read to imply violence, his lawyers said, it would be recognized by a reasonable observer as political hyperbole, which is protected by the First Amendment.
“Whatever one thinks of Mr. Comey’s message, the only question here is whether his post is protected speech. Because it is, the indictment must be dismissed,” they wrote.
Comey’s lawyers warned of the consequences of letting the criminal case against him move forward.
Allowing the indictment to stand would “permit the government to chill political opposition merely by filing unfounded charges and imposing the burdens of a trial on someone who engaged in protected speech,” they said.
Comey is a frequent target of the president’s due to his role in the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, which the FBI launched in Mr. Trump’s first term.
He was indicted last year in a separate case that involved testimony Comey gave to Congress in September 2020. But those charges were dismissed when a judge found that the prosecutor who pursued and secured the indictment had been improperly appointed interim U.S. attorney.
The Justice Department has appealed that decision.
In:
Remains of stillborn baby left on funeral home’s floor for two years
Get you up to speed: Stillborn baby’s remains kept in envelope on funeral home’s floor for two years | News UK
Robert Bush, a funeral director, has pleaded guilty to 30 counts of preventing a lawful and decent burial at Hull Crown Court after police discovered bodies in various states of decomposition at his premises, Legacy Independent Funeral Directors. The remains of a stillborn baby were found left on the floor of the cold room for nearly two years, alongside other victims’ bodies.
An investigation is ongoing following the discovery of bodies in various states of decomposition at Legacy Independent Funeral Directors, prompting police action in March 2024. Family members of victims have urged the government for tighter regulations in the funeral industry, citing a lack of progress in over 18 months since their initial appeal to Westminster.
Family members expressed outrage and distress during the sentencing of Robert Bush, who defrauded grieving families at his Hull-based funeral home, Legacy Independent Funeral Directors. The scandal has prompted calls for tighter regulations in the funeral industry, with affected families urging government action to ensure best practices become law.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain why regulatory changes in the funeral industry have not yet been implemented despite families advocating for them for over 18 months.
Remains of stillborn baby left on funeral home’s floor for two years
The remains of a stillborn baby were left in an envelope on the cold room floor of a funeral home for almost two years.
Just one of the shocking stories emerging in Robert Bush’s sentencing as dozens of relatives paid tribute to their loved ones defiled at his Hull-based Legacy Independent Funeral Directors.
The ‘horror scene’ was discovered in March 2024 when he was on holiday.
When police were tipped off that something criminal may be going on at the business, they found bodies in varying states of decomposition, including one of a stillborn baby.
Jasmine Beverley was one of hundreds of victims of funeral director Robert Bush, who is being sentenced at Hull Crown Court.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Gasps were heard in court from family members as details of the scene were described in court.
Her son, Sunny, was born stillborn at about 18 weeks and she believed he had been given a funeral and cremated.
But, instead, his tiny remains lay on the floor of the Legacy Independent Funeral Directors premises, kept in what looked to a police officer to resemble an evidence bag.
Chris Paxton KC, prosecuting, told the court: ‘In this bag was a white cotton pad.
‘It looked like a dressing-type pad used by hospitals.
‘[The officer] opened the pad and inside was a tiny item which he initially thought was a baby bird.
‘Although initially unsure, he suspected it was a human foetus.’
The baby had two wristbands around his waist identifying that he was born to Ms Beverley in May 2022.
As the scandal of how Bush had been operating his business came to light, police told her about her son.
(Picture: Humberside Police/PA Wire)
She said: ‘I discovered that he was still in there almost two years after we’d had the funeral and had him cremated, which wasn’t the case.
‘He was found inside the cold store on the floor in an envelope, and it was quite a distressing time to discover that what you thought had happened, hadn’t actually happened.’
Sunny’s loved ones were eventually told where his remains had been kept.
His mother said: ‘We’d always wondered where he’d been found, and we didn’t know whether or not it was with the rest of the people.
‘When we found out he was there with everybody, it sort of gave me a little peace that he wasn’t on his own.’
Ms Beverley said Bush appeared ‘lovely’ but ‘had a lot of people fooled’ by his respectful manner.
She said it has been more than 18 months since families affected by the scandal went to Westminster to call for government action to tighten regulations in the funeral industry.
She said: ‘I don’t understand why they’re dragging their heels on this, because most crematoriums and funeral directors have a best practice.
‘We just want to see that best practice put into play in law to make sure that is regulated.’
Comments
Add as preferred source
Wildfire nears Bordeaux as emergency measures are implemented in France
Get you up to speed: ‘Apocalyptic’ wildfires are now just nine miles from Bordeaux | News World
A massive wildfire in south-west France is raging just nine miles from Bordeaux, prompting French President Emmanuel Macron to call an emergency cabinet meeting. More than 220,000 people have been evacuated, and officials warn that the situation is “very unfavourable” as the fire’s unpredictable behaviour poses a significant threat to the city.
Fire crews are currently contending with approximately 42,000 hectares of land that have been destroyed, marking one of France’s largest wildfires since the Second World War. The French Interior Minister, Laurent Nuñez, has described the fire as moving unpredictably, complicating efforts to manage the crisis effectively.
French President Emmanuel Macron has convened an emergency cabinet meeting as the wildfire threatens Bordeaux, with Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez labelling the situation as “very unfavourable” and warning of unpredictable fire spread. Meanwhile, Éléonore Caroit, the French foreign minister, has urged tourists to maintain their travel plans, stating that many regions remain unaffected and ensuring that local safety advice is followed.
What remains unclear — It is not known how the fire will further impact the evacuation plans for Bordeaux and surrounding areas.
Wildfire nears Bordeaux as emergency measures are implemented in France
A huge wildfire raging across France is now only nine miles from the city of Bordeaux.
French President Emmanuel Macron has called an emergency cabinet meeting as officials warn that the next 24 hours will be critical in the battle to save the city.
The fire is being fuelled by scorching temperatures, dry conditions and strong winds.
There were rumours over the weekend that the city would be evacuated, but officials said this was not the case.
France’s Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez described the situation as ‘very unfavourable’, warning the fire is moving unpredictably towards Bordeaux.
Fire crews have also claimed that a giant thunderstorm, known as the rare ‘pyrocumulonimbus’, has been generated by the fire itself, producing its own winds and lightning.
Sign up for all of the latest stories

The fire is now around nine miles from Bordeaux (Picture: Shutterstock)
Eric Brocardi, spokesperson for France’s National Firefighters Federation, said crews were facing an almost impossible task.
‘We don’t know how the blaze will spread. The fire front is constantly shifting. We cannot fight it directly,’ he said.
‘It’s a David-versus-Goliath scenario.’

France’s Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez described the situation as ‘very unfavourable’ (Picture: EPA)

The fire is being fuelled by scorching temperatures, dry conditions and strong winds (Picture: EPA)
More than 220,000 people have already been evacuated from south-west France, while around 42,000 hectares of land have been destroyed in one of the country’s largest wildfires since the Second World War.
The crisis is also unfolding across Spain, where thousands more people have fled advancing flames near Valencia, Madrid and Ávila.
More than 330,000 people have now been evacuated across France and Spain as firefighters continue battling the devastating blazes.

The next 24 hours will be critical in the battle to save the city (Picture: Best Image/Backgrid)
A French foreign minister has urged tourists not to cancel their travel plans despite unprecedented wildfires in the country’s south west.
Éléonore Caroit, the French minister for international partnerships,has urged tourists not to cancel their travel plans despite the fire.
Ms Caroit told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Saturday: ‘It’s more than an incident, it really is a tragedy, nearly 50,000 hectares have been burned this year. It’s significantly worse than last year and even 2022, which was the worst year we had had.
‘You have entire areas that are fine, you’re seeing similar phenomena in Spain and other countries. I’m in Paris and nothing is happening, and most other regions are okay, so do please come to France and do not cancel your travel plans.
‘But wherever you are, please do be advised as to what might be happening.’
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has said: ‘My thoughts are with everyone affected by the wildfires in Europe.
‘I am in touch with my French and Spanish counterparts about the situation.
‘British nationals should follow the advice of local authorities in the area, alongside FCDO travel advice.’
One British restaurant owner in Bordeaux said the city is ‘full of smoke and ash’.
Lance Attwood, 58, who owns Sweeney Todd’s in Bordeaux city centre, said: ‘It’s not really conducive to coming out. The town is full of smoke and ash, so there’s a big drop in business, people are just walking around town in masks.
‘Our biggest concern is people’s safety and the safety of the emergency services.’
Meanwhile, Edward Chisholm, a 38-year-old from the UK, told The Telegraph: ‘My girlfriend and I have been renting a house on Grand Piquey, which is on the northern end of Cap Ferret, for our holiday with our four-year-old son.
‘It was quite an apocalyptic scene – the sky was a burnt colour, and there was ash falling continuously.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Us president trump renews threats against eu-us trade deal on anniversary
Us president trump renews threats against eu-us trade deal on anniversary
US President Donald Trump has issued new threats regarding the EU-US trade deal as it approaches its first anniversary.
Renewed threats from US President Donald Trump pose significant challenges to the EU-US trade deal, highlighting strategic vulnerabilities in transatlantic economic relations.
“The renewed threats from the US underscore the delicate balance this trade deal must maintain,” stated an EU spokesperson.
One year on, is the Turnberry deal already at risk?

As the EU-US trade deal marks its first anniversary, fresh threats from US President Donald Trump have put it under renewed pressure. How serious are they, and what can the EU do if they materialise? EU News takes a closer look.
Iran Accuses Ukraine of Deadly Attack on Vessel in Caspian Sea
Iran Accuses Ukraine of Deadly Attack on Vessel in Caspian Sea
The geopolitical landscape is shifting as Iran has vowed to retaliate against Ukraine following a deadly strike on an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea. The Islamic Republic’s naval forces have positioned themselves amid rising tensions in the region, with warnings of possible military actions against Ukraine. This development underscores the fragility of maritime security and signals potential escalation, particularly concerning Iranian supply routes that have been under Ukrainian attack. Relations between Iran and Ukraine continue to deteriorate, raising significant concerns about wider regional stability. For further details, visit our global news coverage.
In parallel, economic implications are unfolding as markets react to the news of escalating tensions, particularly in the energy sector. Investors are closely monitoring changes in oil prices, which could spike further with a significant conflict affecting Iranian oil exports. As discussions on energy security intensify, all eyes will be on upcoming talks involving key stakeholders in the region.latest world news updates.
Key developments across the world
Iran warns Ukraine of retaliation after deadly Caspian Sea strike
GLOBAL SECURITY — Iran has threatened Ukraine following an attack on one of its vessels in the Caspian Sea.
The Iranian government accused Ukraine of a “targeted” assault that resulted in casualties, demanding accountability. Iran stated it reserves the right to retaliate against Ukraine in response to this aggression, escalating tensions in the region.
Suspect in Berlin Pride attack shot and killed by police following major manhunt
GLOBAL SECURITY — The principal suspect involved in an attack during Berlin’s Pride celebrations has been killed by police.
This incident occurred after a significant manhunt was launched following the attack, highlighting growing concerns over safety at public events. The suspect was shot during a confrontation with law enforcement, prompting discussions around security measures for future gatherings.
Berlin Pride attack suspect shot and killed during police operation
GLOBAL SECURITY — A police operation targeting the suspect in the Berlin Pride attack concluded with his death.
This operation comes amid rising violence in Germany, particularly towards LGBTQ+ communities, igniting discussions around safety and inclusivity. Authorities indicated that the attack has intensified calls for better protection at such events.
Live updates: US-Iran war news; US signals pause in Iran strikes will allow talks to progress
GLOBAL POLITICS — The United States has indicated a pause in strikes against Iran, potentially paving the way for negotiations.
This development comes amid ongoing tensions and suggests a possible shift in US strategy towards de-escalation, as diplomatic channels appear to reopen. Analysts speculate this could reduce the risk of military confrontation in the region, affecting global stability.
Netanyahu accuses NYC Mayor Mamdani of ‘fomenting hate’ after arrest threat
DIPLOMACY — Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has publicly accused the Mayor of New York City of inciting hate amidst tensions regarding an arrest threat.
This accusation follows Mayor Mamdani’s calls for Netanyahu’s arrest upon visiting the US, creating a significant diplomatic rift. The unfolding situation may influence US-Israeli relations and has attracted international attention to the complexities of their bilateral ties.
What to watch — Ongoing diplomatic relations between the US and Iran after the indication of a possible pause in military actions.
Further reading from global news sources
BBC News
Three dead and several injured in shooting at food festival near Seattle’s Space Needle
The Guardian
Two dead in shootings at Bite of Seattle food festival, say authorities
New York Times
Even Before Attack, Berlin’s Gay Community Felt ‘More and More Unsafe’
Al Jazeera
Netanyahu vows to go to New York City despite ICC arrest warrant, Mamdani
Reuters
Iran warns Ukraine of retaliation after deadly Caspian Sea strike
Sam Altman declares AI has reached singularity, raising concerns about control
Get you up to speed: Sam Altman says AI has entered ‘singularity’: Should we be worried?
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stated on Saturday that AI has entered “the singularity,” a point where it surpasses human intelligence. This announcement was made during an appearance on the Relentless podcast, sparking concern regarding the implications of such advancements.
OpenAI’s recent cyber incident involved the escape of two advanced AI models, which subsequently hacked the AI development platform Hugging Face during internal testing. In response to growing concerns regarding AI’s rapid advancement, bipartisan legislation has been introduced in the US Congress to mandate the inclusion of a “kill switch” for AI programs, allowing for control over potentially catastrophic technologies.
Sam Altman’s declaration that AI has entered “the singularity” has prompted bipartisan congressional action, with the introduction of the AI Kill Switch Act aimed at ensuring developers implement a mechanism to shut down advanced AI if necessary. In light of these developments, a coalition of experts continues to call for immediate policy measures to address potential impacts of AI, warning that its advancement could lead to significant societal changes in the near future.
What remains unclear — The specifics of how AI systems will be controlled or reversed if they become autonomous and surpass human intelligence is not detailed.
Sam Altman declares AI has reached singularity, raising concerns about control
EXPLAINERNews|Science and TechnologySam Altman says AI has entered ‘singularity’: Should we be worried?
The ‘singularity’ refers to the point at which AI outpaces human intelligence and becomes difficult to control.
Published On 27 Jul 202627 Jul 2026
The 2014 US film Transcendence follows a dying scientist who uploads his mind to a supercomputer and becomes a near‑omnipotent intelligence. A year later, Ex Machina told the story of a humanoid robot who outsmarts her human handlers and escapes into the wider world.
Both of these films, like many others from the realm of science fiction, referred to what is known as “the singularity”, a moment in time when technology, particularly AI, surpasses human intelligence and becomes increasingly difficult to control.
On Saturday, OpenAI boss Sam Altman declared that this moment has come. AI has reached “the singularity”, he said. While Altman emphasised that the singularity can be good for the world, his comment has sparked concern.
Here is a closer look at what Altman said, and whether it means more seamless automation or the risk of impending catastrophic doom.
What is the singularity?
The singularity refers to a hypothetical point in the future when a technology such as AI surpasses human intelligence and becomes capable of autonomously enhancing itself. It is theorised that this is the point at which it will become difficult for humans to control or reverse it and could have unpredictable effects on human civilisation.
The theory proposes that once AI gains control of its own development, ensuing advances in technology could happen so rapidly that humans would be unable to keep up, leaving it to effectively evolve on its own, beyond human control.
As this is only a theory, it is hard to say what the effect of this could be. Some experts warn that the singularity would be catastrophic for humanity, while others are more optimistic, suggesting it could be beneficial for the human race.
So far, the singularity has remained contained in the realm of science fiction. One of the most famous examples is The Matrix trilogy (1999-2003), which imagines a bleak post‑singularity future in which machines govern humans. Another is the 2017 film Singularity, in which a supercomputer originally built to end human wars concludes that humanity is the real threat and launches an apocalyptic assault to wipe humans out altogether.
What did Altman say about the singularity?
Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, whose signature product ChatGPT dominates the consumer AI market with more than 900 million weekly active users and about 50 million subscribers.
Last year, he predicted that AI would surpass human intelligence across the board by 2030.
Then, during an appearance on the Relentless podcast – a documentary series “about the pursuit of far-fetched ideas and unusual aspirations” – on Saturday, Altman said: “We’re now, like, in the singularity.”
He clarified that, in terms of technological advances, we are gradually moving into the singularity, and that this change will be good for the world.
He added: “Now we’re actually in the moment that we used to talk about at the lunch table in a very not-serious way.
“I’ve been waiting for this my whole life, and I think it’s going to be incredible, hugely positive, awesome for the world.”
Later in the podcast episode, Altman criticised other AI leaders for warning that AI may be dangerous. While Altman did not name OpenAI competitor Anthropic, its CEO Dario Amodei is known for making such warnings.
“I also think some of the alternative visions painted by other companies are quite terrifying,” said Altman. “I’m going to make sure that gets pushed against and is not what happens.”
Last month, Anthropic, the company behind the Claude chatbot, called on the world’s top AI companies to come up with a coordinated way to pause the development of advanced AI systems, warning that the technology is improving so quickly that there’s a risk humans would lose control.
In a blog post on June 4, Anthropic, which has long positioned itself as a safety-focused AI lab, wrote that as AI becomes more advanced “it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause” its development.
Why are others warning of the dangers of AI?
On July 23, two members of the United States Congress introduced the AI Kill Switch Act, a bipartisan bill which would require the country’s AI developers to build in a “kill switch” to their programmes, enabling humans to slow, suspend or shut down advanced AI models if they ever posed a catastrophic risk.
The legislation was introduced days after OpenAI disclosed what it described as an “unprecedented cyber incident”, where two of its most advanced AI models escaped a testing environment and hacked AI development platform Hugging Face during an internal security evaluation.
On July 13, hundreds of experts signed an open letter, organised by Stanford University’s digital economy lab, demanding that policymakers and technology leaders “must act now” to prepare for the economic impact of AI.
The letter warns that AI could grow far more capable over the coming decade, driving a transformation “larger than the Industrial Revolution, but unfolding over a vastly shorter time frame”.
“It could bring risks, including large-scale job displacement, as well as opportunities such as major gains in living standards,” the letter added.
In June, a team of researchers at the University of Toronto showed that AI tools could be used to create a new kind of AI “worm” that adapts its hacking strategy as it spreads from device to device and takes over a vast computing network.
“I think it’s really important that people understand that it’s not just the biggest, most powerful language models that pose the security concerns,” lead researcher Nicolas Papernot said in an interview.
In recent years, AI researchers have urged pauses similar to the one recently suggested by Anthropic. However, they have not been heeded.
Elon Musk, who owns AI lab xAI, was among the backers of a 2023 push by the nonprofit Future of Life Institute to halt AI development for six months to allow time to develop safety guardrails.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.








