LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

EU aims to protect industry as Chinese imports surge and tariffs loom

EU aims to protect industry as Chinese imports surge and tariffs loom

EU Trade Measures

The European Commission is advancing plans to reduce dependence on Chinese suppliers, proposing thresholds requiring EU companies to source critical components from at least three different suppliers.
Trade Deficit Impact
In 2025, the EU’s trade deficit with China reached €359.9 billion, underscoring the considerable economic pressure on European industries.
Firm Stance
“We will fight tooth and nail for every European job, for every European company, for every open sector, if we see they are treated unfairly,” stated Maroš Šefčovič.

Key developments

The European Commission is intensifying measures to shield EU production from Chinese market influx, amid an alarming $113 billion surplus from China in early 2026, escalating concerns over job losses.

New initiatives include a proposed requirement for EU companies to source critical components from at least three suppliers, reducing reliance on single providers, particularly from China, which has previously restricted export of key materials.

Challenges arise as member states exhibit divided interests in handling Chinese relations, complicating Brussels‘ decoupling strategy and raising risks of economic fallout from potential retaliatory actions by China.

As trade war with China looms, how can the EU defend itself?

EU aims to protect industry as Chinese imports surge and tariffs loom

As Chinese-made products are flooding the EU market and threatening thousands of jobs, the European Commission is stepping up its work to protect the bloc’s production from the risks of China’s excess production.

The move comes as data from Chinese customs showed that, in the first four months of 2026, Beijing accumulated a surplus of $113 billion with the EU-27, up from $91 billion over the same period in 2025. The surplus widened by $22 billion over 12 month, while the EU’s trade deficit with China had already reached €359.9 billion in 2025.

Pressure is also mounting on Brussels as Beijing has repeatedly threatened retaliation in recent weeks over several EU laws limiting access to the single market for Chinese companies.

On Friday, China also banned these companies from engaging with the Commission over EU foreign subsidy investigations.

To address the China issue and try to restore a level playing field, EU Commissioners are set to debate the matter on 29 May. What options does Europe have on the table?

1. Cutting dependence on Chinese components

The Financial Times reported on Monday that a plan to force EU companies to buy critical components from at least three different suppliers was in the pipeline at the European Commission.

The idea would be to set thresholds of around 30% to 40% for what can be bought from a single supplier, with the rest having to be sourced from at least three different suppliers, not all from the same country.

The proposal comes after China last year restricted exports of rare earths and chips, which are critical for key EU industries such as green tech, cars and defence.

2. Targeting strategic sectors with tariffs

In its economic security strategy presented last December, the European Commission also said it would present new tools by September 2026 to strengthen the protection of EU industry from unfair trade policies and overcapacities.

“We will fight tooth and nail for every European job, for every European company, for every open sector, if we see they are treated unfairly,” Maroš Šefčovič told EU News.

A decision to impose new quotas and double tariffs on global steel imports, dominated by Chinese overcapacities, was already agreed by EU countries and the European Parliament in April.

Now the chemical industry is in the spotlight. Chinese chemical imports have surged 81% over five years. But the EU chemical sector also relies on exports abroad, including to China, the industry’s fourth export market, which makes any measure targeting China complicated.

“As an export-oriented industry, the European chemical industry generates over 30% of its sales abroad. That creates a risk of retaliation from third countries,” Philipp Sauer, trade expert at Cefic, the lobby group of the European chemical industry, told EU News.

3. Hitting imports with anti-dumping or anti-subsidy duties

The Commission can also impose duties on Chinese companies when import prices fall below those at which they sell their products on their domestic market. It can also investigate companies for receiving unfair subsidies.

However, investigations can take up to 18 months, and cases are piling up at the Commission’s DG Trade, which has only around 140 officials to handle them.

Sauer said that between one third and half of all ongoing investigations relate to the chemical sector.

4. Using the Anti-Coercion Instrument

The Anti-Coercion Instrument is a last-resort tool — the so-called trade bazooka — which can be used in cases of economic pressure from a third country and would allow the EU to hit China with strong measures such as restricting access to licences or public procurement in the EU.

But its use would require the backing of a qualified majority of member states, which is not guaranteed.

Germany opposed tariffs adopted by the EU in 2024 against Chinese electric vehicles. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who has visited China four times in three years, also supports closer ties with Beijing, seeking to secure major Chinese investment.

5. Unifying member states

At the same time, Brussels faces the risk that its decoupling strategy might face significant resistance from national governments. EU member states remain divided over how to approach China, which could in turn allow Beijing to play capitals against each other.

Such differences are already emerging in the information and communications technology (ICT) sector, where the EU has proposed a new mechanism requiring the phase-out of so-called high-risk suppliers, such as Huawei and ZTE, in strategic industries, starting with telecommunications.

The proposal, included in the revamp of the EU Cybersecurity Act, is sparking controversy among several European governments, most notably Spain and Germany, which have long worked with Chinese equipment now deeply embedded in their digital infrastructure.

This de-risking strategy has also raised financial concerns, since Chinese suppliers tend to be much cheaper than European alternatives such as Ericsson and Nokia, partly because they are publicly subsidised by Beijing.

European telecom operators have asked the EU for financial compensation to replace their Chinese equipment, following the example of the US “rip and replace” programme, but neither the EU nor national governments seem keen to put the money on the table.

In other words, the EU’s full decoupling from China might have high political and economic costs.

Whether European countries are willing to bear it remains to be seen.

Justice Department establishes $1.7 billion fund to end Trump IRS lawsuit

Media Lens: Justice Department establishes $1.7 billion fund to end Trump IRS lawsuit


Justice Department announces $1.7B fund for Trump allies.

The Justice Department has announced a $1.7 billion fund to compensate Trump allies as part of a deal to drop an IRS lawsuit. This information was reported in coverage in AP News and The Washington Post.


What happened

The Justice Department has announced a $1.7 billion fund aimed at compensating allies of former President Trump in exchange for dropping an IRS lawsuit. This move is part of a broader effort to resolve ongoing legal challenges involving the former president.

In a related development, Trump has agreed to dismiss a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, which has led to the establishment of an ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ valued at $1.8 billion. This fund is designed to provide financial support to individuals aligned with Trump.

Key facts

  • The Justice Department announced a $1.7 billion fund to compensate Trump allies.
  • This announcement is part of a settlement related to a dropped IRS lawsuit.
  • The fund is intended to support individuals affected by the IRS suit.
  • The deal aims to address allegations of weaponization of the IRS against political opponents.

Where coverage differs

  • AP News emphasizes the financial implications of the fund for Trump allies, while The New York Times emphasizes the political ramifications of the IRS case drop.
  • The Washington Post foregrounds the creation of the “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” rather than the specifics of Trump’s withdrawal from the IRS suit.
  • NPR prioritizes the process of settlement and its broader consequences, over the details of the fund itself.

One story, four angles


AP NewsJustice Department announces a $1.7B fund to compensate Trump allies in a deal to drop IRS suit

Publication: AP News | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: critical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: AP News emphasizes the financial implications of the Justice Department’s fund, implying a controversial backing of Trump’s former associates. The article raises questions about the government’s use of taxpayer money in political settlements.

Publication emphasis: The publication focuses on the potential misuse of funds to benefit political allies rather than the legality of the situation.

Framing analysis: The emphasis is on the political consequences and public perception of governmental resources being allocated for partisan purposes, while the legal aspects are mentioned but secondary.

Bias: Selection: Highlights the controversy surrounding the fund. Language: Uses terms like “compensate” and “drop suit,” which suggest preferential treatment. Omission: Lacks details on the rationale behind the fund’s establishment.

Assessment: Overall, the article critically examines the motivations behind the funding, suggesting a troubling link between political influence and financial decisions.


The New York TimesLive Updates: DOJ Sets Up Fund That Could Pay Trump Allies After President Drops $10 Billion Suit Against IRS

Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: policy | Tone: informative | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: neutral | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: The New York Times provides details about the fund’s establishment, focusing on its implications for IRS dealings and ongoing political dynamics. The updates highlight financial movements without overtly judgmental language.

Publication emphasis: The emphasis is on the administrative procedures and implications of dropping the lawsuit, providing a temporal account of unfolding events.

Framing analysis: The focus is primarily on policy implications—how it affects IRS operations and the landscape of political accountability—while remaining uncritical of the actors involved.

Bias: Selection: Details specific to the fund’s structure. Language: Uses straightforward terminology, barring loaded phrases. Omission: Less focus on potential consequences for Trump or political morality.

Assessment: The article presents a fact-driven narrative without strong editorializing, which can be seen as a neutral yet somewhat detached coverage.


The Washington PostTrump’s deal to drop suit against IRS creates $1.8B ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’

Publication: The Washington Post | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: critical | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: The Washington Post critiques the implications of the deal, framing it as a potential misuse of public funds to benefit Trump allies. It underscores the consequences of politically motivated financial decisions built around partisan divides.

Publication emphasis: The focus is heavily on the consequences for governmental integrity and accountability rather than strictly the legalities involved.

Framing analysis: The reporting foregrounds the political and moral implications of the fund, with secondary attention to its legal specifications.

Bias: Selection: Highlights adverse outcomes for civic accountability. Language: Uses charged terms like “misuse” and “benefit.” Omission: Balances the criticism with less background on government rationale.

Assessment: The article robustly challenges the ethical grounding for the fund, suggesting significant skepticism towards its purpose and effect.


NPRTrump drops IRS lawsuit, paving the way for a settlement

Publication: NPR | Primary framing pattern: moral | Tone: analytical | Intensity: 5/10 | Sentiment: mixed | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: NPR analyzes the decision to drop the IRS lawsuit and its implications for ethical governance, raising questions about political favoritism and accountability in government spending.

Publication emphasis: The piece emphasizes the moral implications, focusing on integrity and the potential consequences for public trust.

Framing analysis: The moral framing centers on the ethical dimensions of political actions and their influence on public perception, with less focus on pure legal aspects.

Bias: Selection: Prioritizes insights on trust and accountability. Language: Uses measured terms like “political favoritism” to frame the moral discourse. Omission: Some specifics on legal ramifications are less emphasized.

Assessment: The article takes a contemplative approach, fostering a critical discourse on ethical governance without being overtly condemnatory.


Food for thought

The AP focuses on the Justice Department’s establishment of a $1.7 billion fund designed to compensate Trump allies, specifically framing it within a strong legal context regarding IRS disputes. Contrastingly, the NYT employs a more escalatory approach, highlighting the fund’s potential to escalate claims against the IRS, with phrases like “Anti-Weaponization Fund.” Meanwhile, the Washington Post frames the fund as a direct outcome of Trump dropping a $10 billion lawsuit, tipping towards a political commentary that underscores systemic implications. NPR adopts a neutral tone, framing the fund’s establishment as a straightforward settlement outcome. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.

Hantavirus-Hit Cruise Ship MV Hondius Docks in Rotterdam for Quarantine

Get you up to speed:

Hantavirus-hit cruise ship docks in the Netherlands

The MV Hondius, a cruise ship affected by a hantavirus outbreak, arrived at the Dutch port of Rotterdam for disinfection. The ship was carrying 25 crew members and two medical personnel, all of whom are reportedly not experiencing any symptoms.

According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, one of the four Canadians in isolation after leaving the ship tested positive for the virus, and they will share information with the World Health Organization (WHO).

The crew who cannot return home will be quarantined in the Netherlands, as confirmed by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport.

Hantavirus-Hit Cruise Ship MV Hondius Docks in Rotterdam for Quarantine

News|HealthHantavirus-hit cruise ship docks in the Netherlands

MV Hondius was carrying 25 crew members and two medical personnel as it reached the Dutch port of Rotterdam.

The hantavirus-hit cruise ship MV Hondius sails off the Dutch coastThe hantavirus-hit cruise ship MV Hondius sails off the Dutch coast as it approaches Rotterdam on May 18, 2026 [Nicolas Tucat/AFP]

A cruise ship hit by a deadly hantavirus outbreak has docked in the Netherlands for disinfection.

The MV Hondius was carrying 25 crew members and two medical personnel as it reached the Dutch port of Rotterdam on Monday, after all the passengers disembarked at other locations. According to the ship operator Oceanwide Expeditions, no one on board is experiencing any symptoms.

A short distance from where the ship docked, authorities had set up white containers along the water. The crew will enter immediate quarantine, with those who cannot be immediately repatriated spending their time in quarantine in these containers.

Three passengers of the ship died, including a Dutch couple who health officials believe were the first exposed to the virus while visiting South America.

The MV Hondius has spent the past six days sailing from the Canary Islands, where the remaining passengers were evacuated and boarded flights to more than 20 countries to enter quarantine.

There were at least 11 cases of infection on the ship, nine of which have been confirmed.

The Public Health Agency of Canada said one of the four Canadians in isolation after leaving the ship had tested positive on Sunday. It said it would share information on the case with the World Health Organization (WHO).

Late Sunday, the WHO said it was maintaining its assessment of the hantavirus outbreak as “low risk”.

“While additional cases may still occur among passengers and crew members exposed before containment measures were implemented, the risk of onward transmission is expected to be reduced following disembarkation and the implementation of control measures,” it said.

Crew members who are unable to return home will be quarantined in the Netherlands, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport said last week. Some two dozen passengers and crew members have already been in quarantine in the Netherlands after arriving in the country on different flights in the last two weeks.

After everyone on board has disembarked, the ship will be decontaminated based on Dutch public health guidelines.

“Personal protective measures are being taken to ensure that the cleaners do not need to quarantine after the cleaning,” the Health Ministry said in a letter to the Dutch parliament last week.

Public health officials will inspect the ship before it is allowed to sail again. The hantavirus outbreak on Hondius is the first known case on a cruise ship.

France’s Pasteur Institute said on Saturday it has fully sequenced the Andes virus detected in a French passenger from the Hondius and found that it matched viruses already known in South America, with no evidence so far of new characteristics that would make it more transmissible or more dangerous.

Two Teens ‘Sexually Assaulted on Great Yarmouth Beach’, Manhunt Underway

Get you up to speed: Two Teens ‘Sexually Assaulted on Great Yarmouth Beach’, Manhunt Underway

SEXUAL ASSAULT ALERT
Two teenage girls reported being raped on South Beach Parade in Great Yarmouth, prompting police to arrest one suspect and search for a second.
POLICE RESPONSE
Chief Inspector Nick Paling confirmed an increased police presence in Great Yarmouth as officers seek further witnesses in connection with the reported rapes.
Ongoing INVESTIGATION
Police in Great Yarmouth have arrested one man and continue to seek a second suspect linked to the reported rapes of two teenage girls.

What we know so far

Two teenage girls have reported being raped on the seafront in Great Yarmouth. The incident occurred on South Beach Parade in the early hours of Saturday morning.

Police have made one arrest in connection with the alleged sexual assault. A man in his thirties was detained in Northamptonshire on Sunday on suspicion of rape and is being held at King’s Lynn Police Investigation Centre.

Officers are actively searching for a second suspect, described as a white man in his thirties or forties with short dark hair and dark facial hair. He was last seen wearing blue jeans and a dark green jacket with a white stripe on both sleeves.

Chief Inspector Nick Paling stated that specialist officers are supporting the victims and expressed concern for the wider community. Increased police presence in the area has been implemented to provide reassurance, and the public is encouraged to approach officers with any information.

Authorities urge anyone who may have witnessed the incident to report online or call the police on 101.

Read in full

Two teenage girls ‘raped on Great Yarmouth beach front’ sparking manhunt for suspect | News UK

Two Teens ‘Sexually Assaulted on Great Yarmouth Beach’, Manhunt Underway
A section of Great Yarmouth beach was cordoned off by police (Picture: Getty Images)

Two teenage girls have reported being raped in a popular seafront of Great Yarmouth.

Police have made one arrest in connection with the alleged sex attack but are actively searching for a second man in his 30s or 40s.

Officers were called to South Beach Parade at 12.37am on Saturday following reports of two rapes.

A man aged in his thirties was arrested in Northamptonshire on Sunday on suspicion of rape and taken to King’s Lynn Police Investigation Centre for questioning, where he remains.

Great Yarmouth, Great Britain - July 8, 2010: Famous Britannia Pier. It is situated on the Great Yarmouth coastline in East Anglia. Bustling pier with seaside theatre shows, arcades and rides, plus food and drink venues.
Two women report being raped on South Beach Parade early hours of Saturday (Picture: Getty Images)

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Police are searching for a second suspect, who is described as a white man with short dark hair, dark facial hair and aged in his thirties or forties.

He was wearing blue jeans and a dark green jacket with a white stripe on both sleeves.

Chief Inspector Nick Paling, district commander for Great Yarmouth, said: ‘We recognise how shocking and distressing these incidents are for the victims, their families, and the wider community.

‘Specialist officers have been deployed to support both girls as we work through this investigation.

‘There will be an increased police presence in the area, with officers carrying out reassurance patrols. Please do approach them if you have any concerns or information.’

Officers have asked anyone who may have witnessed the incident or with any relevant information to report online or call police on 101.

US intensifies blockade on Cuba amid accusations of drone threats

Get you up to speed: US intensifies blockade on Cuba amid accusations of drone threats

Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel spoke at an event commemorating the 65th anniversary of the proclamation of the socialist character of the Cuban Revolution in Havana on 16 April 2026. The US government has been meeting with Cuban exiles in Miami and Washington to discuss potential changes in Cuba’s leadership.

Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel has dismissed US accusations regarding Cuba’s drone capabilities as “fraudulent.” Dr Stephen Wilkinson of the International Institute for the Study of Cuba at The University of Buckingham stated that attempts to impose US dominance over Cuba will only intensify Cuban resistance.

By the end of 2026, the US government is hoping to ‘change leadership’ in Cuba, focusing on reaching a government official in Havana to facilitate this change. Ongoing tensions are exacerbated by accusations from Donald Trump regarding Cuba’s military capabilities, which the Cuban government has dismissed as ‘fraudulent’.

Trump taking over Cuba is a ‘fantasy’ – the country can’t be pacified | News World

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Ernesto Mastrascusa/EPA/Shutterstock (16831977k) Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel speaks at an event commemorating the 65th anniversary of the proclamation of the socialist character of the Cuban Revolution, in Havana, Cuba, 16 April 2026. Cuba marks 65th anniversary of socialist revolution, Havana - 16 Apr 2026
Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel has stood defiant to Donald Trump (Picture: Shutterstock)

The US blockade on Cuba is stressing an already tumultuous relationship between the two countries, as Donald Trump accused Cuba of having drones capable of striking mainland America.

A months-long energy blockade on behalf of the Trump Administration has plunged the island into a blackout, with food and medical supplies running low.

By the end of 2026, the US government is hoping to ‘change leadership’ of Cuba, and is looking for government insiders to ‘cut a deal’ to make it possible, reports in January said.

US claims that Havana has drones that could attack mainland Florida have been dismissed by the Cuban government as ‘fraudulent’.

There are also fears that Trump could use it as a reason for a military intervention, which he’s been hinting at for months now.

Dr Stephen Wilkinson, of the International Institute for the Study of Cuba at The University of Buckingham, told WTX that a continued blockade or attempted military coup in Cuba would be the biggest tragedy in American foreign policy in years.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

A woman prepares a wood fire to cook food during a blackout in Matanzas, Cuba, on April 6, 2026. Matanzas is one of the Cuban cities most affected by electricity shortages, at times going more than 24 hours without power, despite being home to the Antonio Guiteras Thermoelectric Plant, one of the country's most important. (Photo by AFP via Getty Images)
Residents have been forced to cook by candlelight and fire (Picture: AFP)

‘Taking over Cuba is just another fantasy, just like the idea that the US can defeat Iran is a fantasy,’ he explained.

‘They’ve underestimated the Iranians, and they’re underestimating the Cubans. The Cubans are made of very tough stuff. They’re not going to give up.’

Dr Wilkinson added: ‘The Cuban people are very nationalistic and have really been fighting for 200 years for their independence. First against the Spanish, and then, the United States, after it imposed a government on them which they didn’t really want.

‘The revolution of 1959 was really an assertion of Cuban independence and sovereignty from the United States. By trying to reassert its dominance over Cuba, the United States will only deepen the resistance of Cubans towards it.’

The US government has been meeting with Cuban exiles in Miami and Washington, in hopes of reaching a government official in Havana who could help make a change happen – but Dr Wilkinson said those talks show that this potential conflict is another ‘class conflict’.

A brief history of the US-Cuba relationship

The relationship isn’t just about communism, Dr Wilkinson tells WTX.

In 1803, the United States began to desire to take Cuba and make it a state of the Union. At the time, Cuba was a Spanish colony. Hopes of taking over the country then didn’t work out, but decades down the line, politicians made another attempt.

Cuba sits at the mouth of the Gulf of Mexico, and the US wanted sovereignty over the land to protect sea lanes towards the Mississippi Delta, and then the sea lanes to the Panama Canal.

Later, there were American investments in Cuban sugar and economic ties that made Cuba even more vital to the US.

‘The relationship has very little to do with 20th-century ideological struggles. It has mainly to do with 19th-century anti-colonial struggles,’ Dr Wilkinson told WTX. ‘The Cubans have wanted their sovereignty and independence and have fought for it for a long time.’

In 1902, the US intervened after Cuba won independence from Spain and imposed a constitution and settlement on the new country, which was met with backlash.

Throughout the 20th century, the Cuban people fought for independence again, before finally gaining it in 1959, when Fidel Castro took over.

The United States then tried to kill Castro and tried to invade during the failed Bay of Pigs.

For decades after Castro took power, many Cubans fled towards the United States. In 2015, Barack Obama and Raúl Castro began normalising relations again in a major win for diplomacy.

When Trump took office for the first time, however, these were reversed, and Cuba was designated as a state sponsor of terrorism.

The revolution in Cuba did lead to severe economic hardship, food shortages and medical shortages – along with political crackdowns. This led to millions fleeing the country.

‘The ordinary people of Cuba asserted their independence in 1959, and the bourgeoisie, the Cuban upper class, left and went to live in the United States,’ Dr Wilkinson argues.

‘For the last, getting on for 60 years, there has been an internationalised class struggle, and that’s what’s coming to a head now.

‘The people who wish to try and recover Cuba for themselves are living, in my opinion, a Gatsby-esque fantasy: the idea that you could recreate the past and go back to 1959, and try to erase what’s happened in between.’

Cuba has close ties to Venezuela, having received oil and funding from the Caracas government before Nicolas Maduro was ousted.

Since then, the country has been facing increasing blackouts, queues at supermarkets and petrol shortages as it undergoes its worst economic crisis in decades.

What does the US actually want?

Cuba's President Miguel Diaz-Canel waves a national flag during celebrations marking the victory on the 65th anniversary of the Bay of Pigs invasion and the declaration of the socialist character of the Cuban Revolution in Havana on April 16, 2026. Between April 15 and 19, 1961, some 1,400 anti-Castro fighters trained and financed by the CIA attempted to land at the Bay of Pigs, about 250 kilometers south of Havana, but failed to overthrow the communist regime of Fidel Castro. (Photo by ADALBERTO ROQUE / AFP via Getty Images)
The US government has pushed for change in Cuba for decades (Picture: AFP)

For decades, the US has wanted government change in Cuba. Author and historian Louis A Perez wrote that Americans have ‘convinced themselves that they have a beneficent purpose […] from which Americans derived the moral authority to presume power over Cuba’.

Boiled down simply, the US sees Cuban independence as a threat because its government and people don’t want US involvement at all, and are socialist.

The Cuban Missile Crisis also put a sour taste in Americans’ mouths, after the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles across Cuba, leading to a 13-day standoff between the two countries.

Cuba’s alliances with other countries, such as China, Venezuela and Iran, have concerned US government officials.

Dr Wilkinson points out: ‘ The US wants to disband the army, disband the police force, completely dismantle the current government and build a new one in Cuba. They’ve got a blueprint for a kind of colonial regime for a period while they’re ‘rebuilding the country’.

‘The problem is that they won’t find very many Cubans who would be willing to collaborate with them.’

What happens now?

HAVANA, CUBA -- DECEMBER 1979: Fidel Castro smokes a cigar in his office, December 1979, in Havana, Cuba. He was being interviewed by Time Magazine's Editor-in-Chief, Henry Grunwald. (Photo by David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images)
Castro was almost killed by US forces multiple times (Picture: Archive)

If recent and distant history is anything to go by, the standoff could go in two different ways.

Dr Wilkinson argues: ‘The situation in Cuba now is literally one of the United States starving the Cuban people. This is very similar to what the Israeli government did to the people in Gaza, and I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to use the term ‘Gazification’ of Cuba, because this is really what’s happening.

‘This is the worst regime of sanctions that Cuba has been placed under since the very beginning.’

A 1960 US government memo nicknamed the ‘Mallory Memorandum’ also points to what the government wanted in Cuba then – and what seems to be happening now.

‘…Denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government,’ the memo read, referencing a plan to overthrow the Cuban government.

Dr Wilkinson adds: ‘The original objective of that embargo was to cause starvation so that people would rise up and overthrow the government. It was an intention to create a situation of social unrest in Cuba, which would then provide the excuse for an occupation of the island.

‘And that’s really what’s happening again right now.’

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

Hungary prepares to engage with Ukraine on minority rights issues

Hungary prepares to engage with Ukraine on minority rights issues

Hungary Engages
Péter Magyar’s new government has initiated technical discussions with Kyiv to address rights for the Hungarian minority in Ukraine’s western region of Transcarpathia.
Strategic Engagement
Budapest’s readiness to engage in technical discussions with Kyiv is crucial for addressing minority rights and advancing Ukraine’s EU accession process.
Clear Conditions
“We want legally guaranteed language, education, and cultural rights for the Hungarian minority in Transcarpathia as soon as possible,” stated Márton Hajdu, head of Hungary’s Foreign Affairs Committee.

Key developments

The Hungarian ambassador announced Budapest’s readiness to engage in discussions with Ukraine regarding the Hungarian minority, signalling potential advancements following Péter Magyar’s new government formation.

Viktor Orbán, focusing on essential reforms like the rule of law. A key point remains the rights of the Hungarian community in Transcarpathia.

Magyar aims to meet President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in June to address the minority’s situation, with preliminary technical consultations initiated for linguistic and cultural rights protections.

Magyar signals first openness to Ukraine accession talks since Orbán’s departure

696x392 cmsv2 55ccaa10 4a30 55ea 9855 4f40080c2ad6 9762275

The Hungarian ambassador said at a meeting last week that Budapest is now ready to engage on Ukraine to achieve concrete results, as Péter Magyar’s new government initiates technical discussions with Kyiv on how to address the thorny issue of the Hungarian minority.

Under Viktor Orbán, Hungary blocked the opening of the EU accession process for Ukraine on the so-called first cluster, which covers key reforms essential to the negotiation talks, including the rule of law and financial control.

Budapest and Kyiv have long been at odds over the sizeable Hungarian minority living in Ukraine’s western region of Transcarpathia. This tension remains widespread in Hungarian society, even after Magyar’s crushing victory brought an end to Orbán’s 16-year rule.

The previous Hungarian government, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, created an 11-point plan aimed at restoring rights for the Hungarian community in Ukraine. Implementing these measures is still seen by Budapest as important for opening the first key chapter in Ukraine’s EU accession process.

A first concrete sign that relations between the two countries may be improving emerged during a discussion among EU ambassadors last Wednesday, when the Hungarian diplomat said Budapest was ready to engage on the issue.

The ambassador also said that the merit-based methodology should be followed and that Hungary would pay special attention to the rights and legal framework of the Hungarian minority.

Magyar said on April 28 he wants to meet President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in early June to help “improve the situation” of ethnic Hungarians in Western Ukraine. Magyar proposed holding the meeting in Berehove, a Ukrainian town in Zakarpattia Oblast considered the centre of the local ethnic Hungarian community.

Zelenskyy met the Hungarian community on 9 April, 3 days before the Hungarian elections.

The EU has made it a key requirement for Kyiv to adopt and effectively implement an ambitious action plan on minorities, which in Ukraine include not only Hungarians, but also Romanians, Poles, and Bulgarians.

In March, the Ukrainian government announced the introduction of a national day celebrating the Romanian language, as part of a broader effort to improve relations with Bucharest. Kyiv’s step was a response since Romania already observes Ukrainian Language Day annually on November 9.

The issue of Ukraine’s enlargement might be on the agenda of the next European Council meeting, where Magyar and Zelenskyy are also expected to meet at the margins.

However, the office of Council President António Costa will only place Ukraine’s accession on the agenda if concrete progress can be announced at the time in terms of formally lifting the Hungarian veto on the opening of the accession talks, EU News understands.

On Monday, Péter Magyar shared details on Facebook of a phone conversation with President Costa, saying Budapest had initiated technical consultations with the Ukrainian government to guarantee the linguistic, educational, and cultural rights of the Hungarian minority in Transcarpathia.

“President António Costa informed me that he had made it clear to the Ukrainian president yesterday that any further steps must be preceded by respect for the rights of the Hungarian minority living in Ukraine,” Magyar said.

Márton Hajdu, head of the Foreign Affairs Committee in Hungary’s new parliament from the Tisza Party, told EU News that Hungary has a clear condition for moving forward: “We want legally guaranteed language, education, and cultural rights for the Hungarian minority in Transcarpathia as soon as possible.”

A source close to the Hungarian government, speaking anonymously due to the sensitivity of the matter, told EU News that if Ukraine implements the 11-point plan — and if representatives of the Hungarian minority in Transcarpathia approve the outcome — Hungary would likely support opening the first major negotiating chapter with Ukraine.

However, one possible complication is that the Orbán government may have included several difficult or politically sensitive demands within the 11 points, which the source described as “hidden landmines”, potentially making full implementation challenging.

Zelenskyy said Ukraine was “working on all issues” related to the ethnic Hungarian minority in western Ukraine, stressing that ethnic Hungarians are “our citizens, just like everyone else”, and suggesting he viewed the matter as manageable rather than a major obstacle. Budapest views these remarks as constructive.

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha also wrote on X that his government was ready to engage with the new Hungarian government on all issues, including national minorities, “with the aim of restoring trust and good-neighbourly relations between our countries”.

Speaking at the Foreign Affairs Council last week, Sybiha said he considered the election results in Hungary a “pivotal moment” for European integration and that they would give fresh momentum to Ukraine’s path towards full EU membership.

“With the involvement of representatives of the Hungarian community in Transcarpathia, Hungarian-Ukrainian expert-level consultations aimed at resolving the rights of the Hungarian minority in Transcarpathia will begin,” Anita Orbán, Hungary’s deputy prime minister and foreign affairs minister, posted on X on Monday.

The lifting of the Hungarian veto would only be the first step towards opening the accession process for Ukraine.

Other EU member states have so far not publicly expressed their position on the matter and may only reveal their stance once negotiations are well underway

LIVE German 2025 Election