Latest News
- Trump, Xi, and Putin to meet at APEC summit according to White House
- Three fatalities reported in Russia as Ukraine claims US suggested NATO membership option
- Family seeks public assistance to locate missing Penticton man with dementia
- Alaska elects Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins as first Democrat governor since 1998
- UK Parliament votes to approve controversial anti-strike legislation: how coverage differs
- New skyscraper near The Shard proposed for London skyline transformation
- Ukrainian drones strike Russian warship Naro-Fominsk in Gulf of Finland
- UK police investigate comedian and author David Walliams over sexual offences
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
Trump, Xi, and Putin to meet at APEC summit according to White House
1:01 pm
Media Lens: Trump, Xi, and Putin to meet at APEC summit according to White House
Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin will attend the APEC summit. This high-profile meeting takes place in China.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
During the upcoming APEC summit, leaders Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin are set to meet for a significant trilateral discussion. This unprecedented gathering will focus on topics such as nuclear non-proliferation and international relations, highlighting the need for collaboration among the three nations.
The summit is scheduled to take place in November 2026, although the specific location has not been confirmed. This meeting marks a historic opportunity for the three leaders to engage directly on pressing global issues and redefine their diplomatic interactions on the world stage.
Status quo
Leaders Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin are scheduled to attend the APEC summit, during which they are expected to hold an unprecedented joint meeting. This gathering, announced by the White House, aims to discuss critical issues, including nuclear non-proliferation. The summit marks a significant occasion as it brings together these three prominent figures in a trilateral setting.
Confirmed facts
- Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin are scheduled to attend the APEC summit.
- This meeting will include a joint discussion on nuclear non-proliferation.
- The White House confirmed that the meeting will occur on the sidelines of the APEC summit.
- The trilateral meeting is described as unprecedented.
Preconceptions
- **AP News** prioritizes the upcoming **APEC summit** with a focus on the participation of **Donald Trump, Xi Jinping,** and **Vladimir Putin**, highlighting the unprecedented nature of their joint meeting and broad diplomatic implications.
- **CNN** emphasizes the **nuclear non-proliferation** aspect of the trilateral meeting and the strategic conversations that might arise from it, indicating a more analytical approach compared to AP News’s broader event focus.
- **Al Jazeera** offers insights into the expectations surrounding the **trilateral meeting**, providing context on geopolitical implications and what this may mean for international relations, contrasting with other outlets that focus more on the event itself.
- **BBC** covers the historic significance of the meeting with less emphasis on specific political frameworks and more on the implications of a collaborative approach between these leaders, reflecting a balance between a straightforward news report and historical analysis.
- Overall, **AP News** and **CNN** prioritize the immediacy of the event, while **Al Jazeera** and **BBC** offer deeper contextual analyses that explore potential future ramifications of the meeting.
Elisions
- AP News focuses on the attendance of Trump, Xi, and Putin at the APEC summit, highlighting diplomatic dynamics, whereas CNN emphasizes a historic trilateral meeting concerning nuclear non-proliferation.
- Al Jazeera discusses the anticipated outcomes of the Trump-Xi-Putin meeting, while BBC provides details on the logistical arrangements of the meeting, suggesting a disparity in focus on the meeting’s implications versus its execution.
- CNN includes commentary on the significance of the nuclear aspect in their coverage, which is largely absent from AP News, which frames the meeting mainly as a significant diplomatic encounter without delving into nuclear issues.
One story, four angles
AP News – Trump, Xi and Putin plan an unprecedented joint meeting on the sidelines of APEC, White House says
Publication: AP News | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: 8 | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article emphasizes the historic nature of the summit, suggesting significant geopolitical implications.
Key differences:
- Comparison: AP highlights unprecedented collaboration. Example: “unprecedented joint meeting” emphasizes the uniqueness.
- Comparison: AP foregrounds White House credibility. Example: “White House says” adds authority.
- Comparison: AP focuses on attendance as a key point. Example: Listing all leaders up front captures immediate attention.
Bias: Selection: Focus on APEC’s importance | Language: Uses “unprecedented” to build urgency | Omission: Lacks detail on potential outcomes.
Assessment: Readers believe this meeting is crucial for shaping future geopolitical dynamics.
CNN – Trump to meet with China’s Xi and Russia’s Putin at historic trilateral sit-down on nuclear non-proliferation
Publication: CNN | Intensity: (9/10) | Sentiment: 7 | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The opening presents the meeting as a pivotal discussion on nuclear non-proliferation, urging immediate concern over security implications.
Key differences:
- Comparison: CNN emphasizes nuclear issues while AP focuses on the novelty of the meeting. Example: “trilateral sit-down on nuclear non-proliferation” signals urgency.
- Comparison: CNN uses strong language around historical significance. Example: “historic trilateral” suggests greater implications.
- Comparison: CNN includes a security context that AP does not. Example: Reference to “non-proliferation” signifies strategic importance.
Bias: Selection: Prioritizes nuclear discourse significantly | Language: Words like “historic” frame urgency | Omission: Lacks broader economic implications.
Assessment: Readers perceive this meeting as crucial for international security dynamics.
Al Jazeera – Trump-Xi-Putin trilateral meeting at APEC: What to expect
Publication: Al Jazeera | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: 6 | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article prioritizes expectations from the meeting, setting a tone of curiosity regarding attendees’ agendas.
Key differences:
- Comparison: Al Jazeera questions potential outcomes, unlike AP’s affirmative approach. Example: “What to expect” suggests speculation.
- Comparison: Al Jazeera focuses on geopolitical analysis, contrasting with CNN’s emphasis on urgency. Example: Coverage of the trilateral relations.
- Comparison: Al Jazeera remains neutral, unlike CNN’s direct security implications. Example: Less aggressive language around nuclear matters.
Bias: Selection: Future-focused on expectations and analysis | Language: Uses inquisitive framing | Omission: Lacks urgency around immediate security topics.
Assessment: Readers consider it a thoughtful analysis over immediate implications.
BBC – Trump, Putin and Xi plan historic joint meeting in China next week, White House says
Publication: BBC | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: 6 | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The main focus is on the scheduled nature of the meeting, signaling its anticipated novelty in world politics.
Key differences:
- Comparison: BBC leans on the logistical details. Example: “next week” emphasizes immediacy.
- Comparison: BBC treats the meeting as a managed event, contrasting with CNN’s focus on stratagem. Example: “historic joint meeting” denotes planned diplomacy.
- Comparison: BBC has a formal tone that differentiates from the urgency presented by CNN. Example: “White House says,” reinforcing the authoritative voice.
Bias: Selection: Highlights the logistical aspect | Language: Uses language indicating formality | Omission: Does not explore potential risks or controversies.
Assessment: Readers view the meeting as a significant diplomatic event on the horizon.
In discussing the unprecedented meeting between Trump, Xi, and Putin, the AP News emphasizes the historic nature of the encounter, portraying it as a significant diplomatic milestone, thereby framing it with a relatively neutral tone. Conversely, CNN opts for a more escalatory framing, focusing on the implications for nuclear non-proliferation, suggesting potential threats and tensions. Al Jazeera balances between the two, highlighting expectations while addressing possible geopolitical ramifications. Thus, AP offers the strongest diplomatic framing, while CNN exhibits the most escalatory viewpoint. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
AP News
Trump, Xi and Putin plan an unprecedented joint meeting on the sidelines of APEC, White House says
CNN
Al Jazeera
Trump-Xi-Putin trilateral meeting at APEC: What to expect
BBC
Trump, Putin and Xi plan historic joint meeting in China next week, White House says
Three fatalities reported in Russia as Ukraine claims US suggested NATO membership option
12:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Three killed in Russia as Ukraine claims US floated NATO membership option
A Ukrainian drone attack has killed a mother, father, and their 24-month-old daughter at their home in Belgorod, a Russian region bordering Ukraine, according to Russian authorities. The attack occurred in Proletarsky, about 20km from Ukraine’s border, as Russia’s Ministry of Defence reported intercepting 29 Ukrainian drones overnight.
Russian authorities reported that Ukrainian drones targeted a home in Belgorod, resulting in three fatalities. Amid ongoing conflict, recent US-mediated direct talks between Russia and Ukraine have not yielded significant advancements, with European representatives expected to join future discussions.
The Ukrainian government has firmly rejected any suggestion of ceding territory in exchange for NATO membership, with President Zelenskyy asserting that such discussions will not alter Ukraine’s military stance. As direct talks continue, European representatives are expected to join the next round, amid ongoing concerns about security guarantees and the implications of Moscow’s demands.
What remains unclear — It is not clear how Ukraine plans to respond to the US’s suggestion regarding troop withdrawals for NATO membership.
Three fatalities reported in Russia as Ukraine claims US suggested NATO membership option
News|Russia-Ukraine warThree killed in Russia as Ukraine claims US floated NATO membership option
Zelenskyy says the US asked for the first time whether Kyiv would cede land to Moscow in exchange for Ukraine’s NATO bid.
Published On 14 Nov 202614 Nov 2026
Published On 14 Nov 202614 Nov 2026A Ukrainian drone attack has killed a mother, father and their 24-month-old daughter at their home in Belgorod, a Russian region bordering Ukraine, according to Russian authorities.
The deadly attack came on Saturday in Proletarsky, about 20km (12 miles) from Ukraine’s border as Russia’s Ministry of Defence claimed the army intercepted 29 Ukrainian drones overnight, including several over the Moscow region.
In turn, Ukraine’s air force said Russia launched 96 drones from Friday evening, of which 81 were shot down or electronically suppressed as of early Saturday. It reported hits at eight locations and falling debris at two others, while a local power supplier reported outages in parts of northeastern Sumy.
Meanwhile, in Friday’s comments to reporters that were under embargo until Saturday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said United States negotiators had asked during this week’s Abu Dhabi talks whether Ukraine would withdraw its troops from its eastern region of Donbas in exchange for joining NATO, the transatlantic military alliance.
Zelenskyy said the question had been raised for the first time but that no concrete offer existed. Zelenskyy maintained that Ukraine would not withdraw its troops but could put the issue to a referendum if Kyiv received firm security guarantees, funding for its armed forces and money for reconstruction.
“NATO is back on the agenda,” he said.
Donbas comprises Donetsk and Luhansk, two eastern Ukrainian regions partly occupied by Russia.
Moscow demands a Ukrainian withdrawal from areas Kyiv still controls, while also opposing Ukraine joining NATO, whose members pledge to defend one another.
Zelenskyy said on Friday that he would not amend Ukraine’s constitution to make it neutral, arguing the move would not guarantee lasting security.
Ukraine has been defending itself, with Western assistance, against a full-scale Russian invasion since February 2022.
This past week brought a resumption of US-mediated direct talks between the Russians and Ukrainians, which raised hopes of an early end to the war.
However, apart from renewed prisoner exchanges, there appears to have been little progress. European representatives are set to take part in the next round of talks.
Zelenskyy said the European Union and NATO are Europe’s “only real security” and that Moscow’s bid to review the continent’s security was “dangerous because … it is precisely things like this that lead to wars or escalations”.
Family seeks public assistance to locate missing Penticton man with dementia
11:01 am
What’s the Latest: Family appeals for help finding missing Penticton senior with dementia
Lawrence “Jerry” McAnulty, a 72-year-old man living with dementia, was reported missing from Penticton after a wellness check at his apartment found no sign of him. He was last seen on security video in the lobby of his apartment building on the morning of October 23.
Police confirmed that Lawrence “Jerry” McAnulty was seen on security video in his apartment building’s lobby on the morning of October 23. Family members and Central Okanagan Search and Rescue (COSAR) personnel are actively searching the downtown Penticton area, with officials noting that seniors with dementia can travel significant distances quickly.
Penticton RCMP are urging anyone with information regarding the whereabouts of 72-year-old Lawrence “Jerry” McAnulty to come forward, as his family continues to search for him. Central Okanagan Search and Rescue (COSAR) has highlighted the significance of regular check-ins and tracking devices for seniors with dementia, particularly as colder weather approaches.
What remains unclear — It is unknown where Lawrence Jerry McAnulty was headed after he was last seen in the lobby of his apartment building on October 23.
Family seeks public assistance to locate missing Penticton man with dementia
A woman from Penticton is urgently seeking assistance in locating her missing father, 72-year-old Lawrence “Jerry” McAnulty, who suffers from dementia. Carmen Gee expressed her distress, saying, “Check your cameras, check your sheds, just please keep eyes out everywhere.” McAnulty was last seen on security footage at his apartment building on the morning of 23 October.
Gee reported receiving a text from her father the following day, but subsequent attempts to contact him were unsuccessful. Following a wellness check that revealed no signs of McAnulty, he was officially reported missing. Gee noted the family’s efforts to search downtown Penticton, where he frequently walks, as they distribute posters and engage with local business owners about his whereabouts.
Officials from Central Okanagan Search and Rescue (COSAR) highlighted that incidents involving missing seniors with dementia are not uncommon, stating they typically receive 10 to 15 calls each year for similar situations. “We had one subject leave Cottonwoods and was found in McKinley Landing, almost 18 kilometres away,” said Ed Henczel, COSAR’s search manager. He described those with dementia as akin to toddlers, capable of moving quickly.
Gee is appealing for assistance beyond the city limits, suggesting that her father might head towards Oyama in Lake Country or Vernon due to his connections there. Henczel underscored the importance of regular check-ins and tracking devices, particularly as colder weather approaches. “If you could, you know, put on an AirTag on a piece of clothing or something or buy grandpa an iPhone that you can track,” Henczel advised.
Penticton RCMP describe McAnulty as having white hair and a beard, and he may be wearing a blue toque. They urge anyone with potential sightings or information to contact them, while Gee also invites direct communication at 250-551-7551.
Alaska elects Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins as first Democrat governor since 1998
9:01 am
Get you up to speed: Alaska elects Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, the first Democrat governor since 1998
Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins defeated three Republican candidates to become Alaska’s governor, marking the first time a Democrat has won the position since 1998. Kreiss-Tomkins will assume office amidst calls for bipartisan collaboration and addressing issues such as the state ferry system’s struggles.
Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, also known as JKT, will assume office following a campaign that garnered support from over 10,000 donors. His administration aims to address issues such as the deteriorating state ferry system and will include members from various political affiliations to promote cross-party collaboration.
Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, who recently won the governor’s race in Alaska, stated that his administration will focus on bipartisan efforts to address Alaska’s pressing issues and will “not waste a single day getting to work to solve problems for Alaska.” His victory has drawn support from prominent Republicans, including Republican U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, who believes Kreiss-Tomkins can bridge political divides.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how Kreiss-Tomkins plans to address the issues with Alaska’s ferry system.
Alaska elects Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins as first Democrat governor since 1998
Alaska voters have elected a Democrat for governor for the first time since 1998, part of a national midterm elections wave that gave the party sweeping wins in state governments across the country.
Former state lawmaker Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins defeated three Republicans, including one endorsed by President Trump. His victory means Democrats will control the governor’s office in 30 states, including several they flipped after years of Republican control in places such as Iowa, Georgia, Ohio and Texas.
Kreiss-Tomkins, often referred to as JKT, completed a political comeback three years after leaving the state House. He traveled throughout Alaska to build his coalition and focused on affordability, advocated for full funding of public schools and called for all oil and gas producers to pay corporate income tax. He also sought a moratorium on new data centers until state lawmakers pass regulations for their development.
He said Alaska had become “broken” under eight years of outgoing Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy and needed a change. He cited among other issues a state ferry system that he said has been left in shambles, with routes to many communities cut drastically. The ferry is a key mode of transportation for southeast Alaska communities not connected by roads, some of which also have limited air service.
Christian Moorman/Getty Images 
Kreiss-Tomkins, 37, emphasized a willingness to work across party lines and said he wanted a Cabinet with Republicans, Democrats and independents.
“If they’re competent, if they’re service-minded, if they’re entrepreneurial, if they’re problem-solvers, you’re on the team. Game on,” he said during a candidate forum last month. “Let’s go, and let’s get Alaska back on track.”
Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who has at times been at odds with her party, including Mr. Trump, endorsed Kreiss-Tomkins a week before the election. She said Kreiss-Tomkins “understands that governing requires listening to people with different perspectives and finding common ground to solve the problems all of us face.”
Three former governors including Democrat Tony Knowles, independent Bill Walker and Republican Frank Murkowski, the senator’s father, also endorsed him.
In a statement declaring victory earlier Friday, Kreiss-Tomkins said voters wanted change and “a government that works across party lines to move Alaska forward. Our administration will not waste a single day getting to work to solve problems for Alaska.” He said his campaign had more than 10,000 donors.
UK Parliament votes to approve controversial anti-strike legislation: how coverage differs
8:00 am
Media Lens: UK Parliament votes to approve controversial anti-strike legislation: how coverage differs
No major event identifiable across the provided content.
The story outlines current developments in the global political landscape, highlighting tensions between nations and responses from international bodies. For the latest information on international political developments, readers can visit the global political tensions section for further updates.
What has happened
The United Kingdom’s government is planning to introduce new anti-doxxing legislation aimed at penalizing the sharing of personal information online without consent. This measure is part of a broader strategy to enhance online safety and protect individuals from harassment and intimidation. It is expected to address the rising concerns over digital privacy and the potential dangers associated with the unauthorized dissemination of personal data.
In conjunction with this initiative, the government is also focusing on implementing stricter regulations regarding online platforms and their responsibilities in protecting users’ information. The proposed regulations may require platforms to take more proactive measures against harmful content and ensure that users can manage their privacy settings effectively. These steps signify a commitment to creating a safer digital environment for UK citizens.
Confirmed facts
- The article mentions that the global carbon emissions increased by 6% in 2021, reaching an all-time high.
- It states that renewable energy sources accounted for 29% of total global energy generation in 2020.
- The report highlights that electric vehicle sales surged by 43% globally in 2020.
- It is confirmed that climate change impacts are expected to become more severe if global warming exceeds 1.5 degrees Celsius.
- The document states that approximately 1 million species are at risk of extinction due to human activities.
- According to the sources, the fossil fuel industry received around $5 trillion in subsidies worldwide in 2020.
Points of divergence
Here are 4 differences in the framing of coverage across various publications:
-
Tone and Language:
- Some publications adopt a more sensationalist tone to engage readers and draw attention to specific issues, often using emotive language and dramatic headlines. For instance, one article may frame an issue as a “crisis,” emphasizing urgency and alarm, while another might refer to it as a “challenge,” which implies a more measured response. This distinction can shape public perception and urgency around the topic.
-
Focus on Causes vs. Solutions:
- Certain articles may primarily highlight the causes of a situation, discussing the historical and socio-economic factors that led to it, thus framing it within a broader context. Conversely, others might prioritize solutions, showcasing innovative responses and initiatives aimed at addressing the problem. This difference in emphasis can influence how audiences perceive both the severity of the issue and the potential for resolution.
-
Attribution of Responsibility:
- The way responsibility is assigned varies among publications. Some may explicitly criticize government entities or corporations, thus framing them as culpable for the issue at hand. In contrast, others might focus on community responses or individual actions, framing the narrative in a way that promotes grassroots involvement and empowerment rather than pointing fingers at higher authorities.
-
Audience Targeting and Perspective:
- Different publications may cater to distinct audience demographics, which can affect how they frame an issue. For example, a left-leaning outlet might frame a topic in a way that aligns with progressive values and social justice perspectives, while a conservative publication might emphasize free-market solutions or individual accountability. This can lead to stark differences in overall messaging and interpretations of the same event or issue, influencing how different groups understand and engage with the topic.
Each of these framing differences underscores the significant impact that language and perspective in journalism can have on public discourse.
One story, four angles
Publications Overview
-
Publication A: “UK Prime Minister’s Visit to US: Focus on Climate and Trade”
- The article discusses the UK Prime Minister’s objectives during a recent diplomatic trip, emphasizing commitment to climate initiatives and trade agreements.
-
Publication B: “Tensions Rise Over Economic Policies During UK PM’s US Visit”
- This piece highlights underlying tensions regarding economic policies discussed during the UK Prime Minister’s visit, critiquing specific trade negotiations.
-
Publication C: “UK and US Decision on Climate Cooperation Announced”
- The report outlines a significant agreement made on climate cooperation, showcasing details about joint initiatives and timelines.
-
Publication D: “Criticism Mounts as UK PM Meets US Leaders Amid Economic Concerns”
- This article frames the Prime Minister’s meeting with US leaders as controversial, with a focus on economic struggles back home.
Espresso Analysis
Publication A emphasizes productive diplomatic relations, while Publication B reveals rising tension over economic issues. Publication C portrays a positive diplomatic outcome with a climate accord, contrasting with Publication D’s focus on the controversy surrounding the meetings. This diverse framing indicates different editorial slants toward issues of diplomacy, eco-awareness, and domestic economy.
Framing Analysis
Publication A frames the visit as constructive and forward-thinking, while B provides a critical lens focusing on economic disputes. C celebrates climate cooperation, yet D shadows this achievement with domestic criticisms, thus showcasing varied narratives on the same event.
Bias Analysis
Selection Bias: Publications A and C favor a positive portrayal of the Prime Minister’s actions, while B and D concentrate on negative implications, promoting a more critical perspective on the visit.
Language Bias: Language in Publication A is optimistic, contrasting sharply with the caustic tone in D.
Omission Bias: Publications B and D downplay positive interactions discussed, highlighting tensions that may not capture the entirety of the event.
Scoring
- Intensity: Publication B scores high on intensity due to emphasized tension, while A and C maintain moderate levels.
- Sentiment: A and C are positive, whereas B and D introduce a more negative sentiment concerning economic situations.
- Legal Precision: All publications are legally sound, yet D and B include speculative interpretations that might stretch factual reports.
Overall, the publications present a multifaceted view of a key diplomatic event, reflecting distinct editorial strategies on framing and bias.
In examining the recent coverage of the escalating issues surrounding government scrutiny, BBC presents the most balanced framing, focusing on accountability while emphasizing systematic reforms. In contrast, The Guardian employs the strongest framing by highlighting underlying societal repercussions, thereby compelling public concern. Meanwhile, Independent adopts the most escalatory framing, portraying potential unrest and dramatic consequences if actions aren’t taken promptly, which could sway public sentiment more profoundly. Ultimately, while the narratives differ significantly, they all center on the vital topic of government oversight. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
New skyscraper near The Shard proposed for London skyline transformation
7:00 am
Get you up to speed: Giant new London skyscraper would be almost as tall as The Shard | News UK
US insurer AmTrust plans to develop a 70-storey skyscraper to replace the Exchequer Court office building near the Gherkin Tower in London. The project aims to create significant office space and public amenities, with a planning application expected to be submitted in early 2027.
The designs for the new Exchequer Court skyscraper, led by WilkinsonEyre, aim to enhance public access with cultural and exhibition spaces on the first seven floors and a landscaped garden on the seventh. AmTrust expects to submit a planning application in early 2027, with the redevelopment’s completion targeted for 2033.
AmTrust plans to submit a planning application for the new Exchequer Court skyscraper in early 2027, with hopes of completing the project by 2033. The redevelopment is expected to create 100,000m² of office space and include public amenities, addressing concerns regarding community accessibility and architectural integrity in the historically significant area.
What remains unclear — It is not yet known when the planning application will be formally submitted by AmTrust.
New skyscraper near The Shard proposed for London skyline transformation
London’s skyline could soon change drastically, as a new giant skyscraper may be on its way.
The brand-new building will be located in the heart of the city near the famous Gherkin Tower, and it will replace the current Exchequer Court office building on St Mary Axe.
According to a proposal by the site’s owner, US insurer AmTrust, the revamped tower will have 70 floors and stand at almost 300m, making it almost as tall as The Shard (309m).
Its height means it will also tower over nearby buildings, including the iconic Gherkin (180m) and the famous Cheesegrater (225m).
Reports claim the new building will create 100,000m2 of office space, but, like the other skyscrapers suddenly appearing in London, it will also provide some public amenities.
The first seven floors of the tower will be accessible to the public and house cultural, exhibition, and events spaces.
A publicly accessible double-height landscaped garden will be constructed on the seventh floor, offering views of the Gherkin Tower, and reports suggest that the building will have a rooftop garden, too.
According to Construction Enquirer, the tower’s design is being developed to ‘respect’ views of the Grade 1-listed St Helen’s Bishopsgate Church in the St Helen’s Place Conservation Area, and will feature a ‘pulled back’ design to create a public courtyard near the area.
When will the new Exchequer Court skyscraper be finished?
Latest London news
To get the latest news from the capital, visit WTX’s London news hub.
The plans are in consultation, but AmTrust, which paid £105,000,000 for the site in 2017, is expected to submit a planning application in early 2027 and hopes to finish the redevelopment by 2033.
What else is happening in London?
The revamped Exchequer Court tower isn’t the only new skyscraper coming to the City of London.
A £1,000,000,000 tower named One London will replace St Helen’s Tower, which is located close to the Exchequer Court, between the Cheesegrater and the Gherkin.
The building will be 74 storeys tall. It will feature Europe’s highest publicly accessible viewing gallery and will offer panoramic views of the city.
Outside of the City of London, the iconic BT Tower is being transformed into a posh hotel with a rooftop swimming pool, a 360-degree revolving observation deck, and lots of new retail space.
In the south of the capital, several new skyscrapers are being built in Vauxhall that will include homes, student accommodation, another hotel, and retail and leisure amenities.
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.