- Commuters advised to check travel plans as heat alert issues ahead of 38°C temperatures
- Russia officials accused of abducting and indoctrinating thousands of Ukrainian children
- NATO concludes Russia bears full responsibility for airspace incursions
- Karoline Leavitt resigns as White House press secretary amid Trump changes
- London-area animal rescue burdened with £200,000 bill after cat seizure
- Trump secretly switched planes shortly after credible Iranian missile threat
- Putin claims he has never been afraid of anything during public appearance
- Spain experiences first total solar eclipse in over a century
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Commuters advised to check travel plans as heat alert issues ahead of 38°C temperatures
Get you up to speed: Commuters warned after extreme heat alert activated ahead of 38°C temperatures | News UK
The Met Office has issued extreme amber heat warnings across London, the South East, East of England, and the East Midlands, as the UK endures its fifth heatwave with temperatures potentially reaching up to 38°C. Rail services are expected to face disruptions, with several companies advising passengers to only travel if essential due to the exceptionally high temperatures.
An amber heat warning is in effect from 9am today until midnight, covering multiple regions including London and the South East. Train services across various operators, including Chiltern Railways and East Midlands Railway, are being disrupted, with reduced timetables in place and a strong recommendation for passengers to limit travel to essential trips only.
The Met Office has issued an amber heat warning, predicting temperatures could rise as high as 38°C across parts of the UK, particularly in London and the East Midlands. In response, rail operators, including Chiltern Railways and East Midlands Railway, are advising passengers to travel only if essential and have implemented reduced schedules to manage the heat’s impact on services.
What remains unclear — It is not confirmed how long the extreme heatwave and its associated disruptions will last across the UK.
Commuters advised to check travel plans as heat alert issues ahead of 38°C temperatures
Another hot spell has landed in the UK and it could push temperatures in parts of the country up to 38°C.
The fifth heatwave is underway with Met Office’s extreme amber heat warnings active from 9am today until midnight due to the scorching weather front.
London, the South East, East of England and East Midlands are set to feel the brunt of the heatwave, with temperatures remaining high for the rest of the week.
Heat health alerts are also in place, covering all of England as the temperatures are likely to impact the health and wellbeing of people.
Rail disruption warning
Several train companies have said they are likely to be hit by disruption due to the weather, and many have told passengers to only travel if essential.
Extreme heat can cause on-the-ground railway temperatures to top 50°C and rail to buckle. This is why stretches of railway, especially in direct sun, can have speed restrictions in place and fewer trains might be scheduled.
Chiltern Railways is operating on a reduced timetable between 11am and 8pm as a result to ensure a ‘reliable service’ can be provided ‘during the hottest part of the day’.
Michael Stewart, from Chiltern Railways, said: ‘If you do need to travel, please check your journey before setting out, allow extra time and carry water with you to stay hydrated.’
Temperatures will rise quickly tomorrow, with many areas reaching 35°C+ and highs of 36-37°C possible, especially across the Midlands, east and southeast
An Amber Extreme Heat Warning is in force, with the heat potentially causing impacts to health, transport and infrastructure pic.twitter.com/tS4Tc4eWra
— Met Office (@metoffice) August 12, 2026
He added that customers should travel ‘only if it’s essential on Thursday because of the exceptionally high temperatures forecast across our network’.
Stewart hopes that the minimised schedule will provide more ‘comfort’ for travellers.
Full list of rail companies impacted by hot weather
Here are all the train operators which have announced planned service changes due to weather this week.
- c2c
- Chiltern Railways
- CrossCountry
- East Midlands Railway
- Great Western Railway
- Northern
- Transport for Wales
- West Midlands Railway
Today, off-peak services between London Marylebone and Birmingham Moor Street will be running hourly, with some services between London Marylebone and Oxford cancelled.
Latest heatwave news and guidance
To get the latest news on the hot weather, visit WTX’s heatwave hub.
Chiltern Railways will not run any services from Birmingham Snow Hill after 10.15am.
Shuttle services from Leamington Spa to Birmingham Moor Street will only run until 11am.
Should customers no longer wish to travel tomorrow, full fee-free refunds are available from their point of purchase, the operator has confirmed.
Alternatively, tickets dated for tomorrow can be used on Friday or Saturday.
Rail chaos continues throughout the UK, with other operators suspending numerous services this week including East Midlands Railway (EMR), which has also advised only ‘essential’ journeys tomorrow.
EMR confirmed that regional services between Sheffield and Liverpool will be suspended on Thursday, while services between Nottingham and Worksop and between Nottingham and Leicester will be suspended after 12pm.
Customers have been encouraged to travel before midday where possible and to expect longer journeys and increased risk of short-notice changes, with providers asking for ‘patience and understanding’.
Temperatures haven’t risen above 3638°C in August for six years, with 36.438°C recorded at Heathrow and Kew Gardens in 2020.
It comes amid reports that 2026 is looking likely to be the hottest summer on record, while nearly three-quarters of England and the whole of Wales are in drought due to the driest July yet.
Comments
Add as preferred source
Russia officials accused of abducting and indoctrinating thousands of Ukrainian children
Get you up to speed: The Ukrainian children ‘abducted and brainwashed’ by unsanctioned Russians | News World
Marina Peschanskaya and Anton Demidov have been implicated in the abduction and brainwashing of thousands of Ukrainian children from occupied territories. The UK government is facing calls for sanctions against the pair following reports of their roles in these alleged crimes.
The UK government has not yet sanctioned Marina Peschanskaya or Anton Demidov, despite their involvement in the abduction and alleged brainwashing of Ukrainian children. Ukraine’s Regional Center for Human Rights has described their actions as years-long efforts to implement policies aimed at the re-education of these children, with the current estimate of forcibly taken children ranging from 260,000 to 700,000.
The UK government faces mounting pressure from senior MPs and human rights groups to impose sanctions on Russian officials Marina Peschanskaya and Anton Demidov, who are accused of abduction and brainwashing of Ukrainian children. The Ukrainian Embassy emphasised their support for sanctions and asserted that such actions represent grave violations of international law, while the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office stated that sanctions are kept under review and it is not appropriate to speculate on future designations.
What remains unclear — The UK government’s reasons for not sanctioning Marina Peschanskaya and Anton Demidov, despite widespread international sanctions against them, are not specified.
Russia officials accused of abducting and indoctrinating thousands of Ukrainian children

Marina Peschanskaya and Anton Demidov have allegedly played key roles in crimes against Ukrainian children
The government is facing calls to sanction two Russian officials accused of abducting and brainwashing thousands of Ukrainian children.
The apparatchiks appear to play a key role in the alleged ‘kidnaping’ and ‘reformating’ of kids from occupied Ukraine, WTX can reveal.
Marina Peschanskaya has openly talked about transporting thousands of children from seized Ukrainian land, while Anton Demidov has led efforts to recruit thousands of people into his nationalistic youth wing.
Despite being sanctioned by countries across the world, neither have not been targeted by British officials.

Russia is accused of militarising deported Ukrainian children
Senior MPs, Human Rights groups and war crimes campaigners have told WTX that Peschanskaya, Demidov and other figures linked to the abduction of children should be sanctioned.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Alicia Kearns, Shadow National Security and Safeguarding Minister, said: ‘This is not evacuation, it is abduction and a war crime.
‘Russia has industrialised the abduction of children from illegally occupied Ukraine and beaten them through a system designed to brainwash them out of their own identity.’
She continued: ‘The UK cannot claim to stand with Ukraine while the officials responsible go unsanctioned by our government.’
The two Russian officials named in this report are among dozens forming part of a new art exhibition in central London highlighting alleged crimes committing by Putin’s men.
Ukraine has identified close to 20,000 forcibly deported children, but there are fears the true number could be in the hundreds of thousands.
Peschanskaya, head of the children’s rights watchdog in Sevastopol, occupied Crimea, has repeatedly talked about supposedly evacuating thousands of children from occupied Ukraine.
Sanctioned by the EU and Switzerland, the commissioner has spoken openly about the need to ‘reformat’ these kids who arrive hating Russia from Ukraine.
Peschanskaya boasted in an interview in December 2023 about 6,000 children from conquered Ukraine now living in Sevastopol, according to pro-Kremlin news site PolitNavigator.
However, she said kids from occupied Zaporizhzhia and Kherson ‘arrived with a different mentality, a different worldview’.
She added: ‘At the federal level, in Moscow, we talked with psychologists about how to properly reformat a child, what approach to find, and this requires quite serious work.
Peschanskaya, who also overseas children’s commissioners in Russia’s southern districts, continued: ‘It’s worth noting that psychologists and teachers need to be heavily involved in their lives to help them reframe their thinking.’
Children from Donetsk and Luhansk, she added, ‘showed much greater adaptability.
Fedir Kurlak, the chief executive of the Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain, is clear that ‘what Russia describes as ‘re-education’ or ‘reformatting’ is, in reality, brainwashing.’
He added: ‘ Taking children from occupied territory and teaching them to reject their own country, culture and identity is not education or humanitarian assistance.’

Peschanskya has been widely sanctioned by the EU and Switzerland
Peschanskaya has not been sanctioned by the UK even her colleague on a national level, the Children’s Rights Commissioner for Russia, Maria Lvova-Belova, has been.
Alex Sobel MP, who chairs parliament’s Ukraine group, called Peschanskya’s language about ‘reformating’ children ‘chilling’
He told WTX: ‘This is not evacuation or education, but a deliberate attempt to erase who these children are and turn them against their own country.
‘The UK Government should now align with our European allies by sanctioning her and consider action against every individual and organisation implicated in the abduction, indoctrination, and militarisation of Ukraine’s children.’
Another key Russian figure who has not been sanctioned is Anton Demidov.
Demidov has already been blacklisted by Canada for his role as chair of the Young Guard of United Russia (MGER), which has been accused of ‘brainwashing’ and ‘militarising’ children, including deported ones.

Demidov has been pictured running events with ‘evacuated’ Ukrainian children
The MGER, the youth wing of Russia’s ruling party, has recruited children from branches across occupied Ukraine, including more than 11,000 in Donetsk alone, according to their Telegram.
Demidov personally held an event with children ‘evacuated’ from Ukraine into Russia at the headquarters of the MGER.
The kids were taught about the group’s political project PolitZavod and also attended a ‘Moscow socio-patriotic educational campus’.
MGER has been pictured holding military-sports events in formerly Ukrainian territory, such as Sevastapol.
According to one post from the Young Guard in Sevastopol, children were taught ‘skills that everyone should know, from tactical medicine to marksmanship and weapons handling.’
The young wing has also been heavily involved in supporting Russia’s war against Ukraine.
A post on their website boasts that they have ‘servicemen participating in the “special military operation”‘, and deliver ‘thousands of drinks and pieces of equipment to the front’.
Ukraine’s official war sanctions page further alleges that the MGER participates in the ‘mass abduction, illegal deportation, and forced relocation of Ukrainian citizens, including children’.

MGER’s young recruits have been involved in Russia’s war against Ukraine
Ukraine’s Regional Center for Human Rights told WTX that Marina Peschanskaya and Anton Demidov ‘have for years been involved in implementing policies aimed at the re-education of Ukrainian children.’
They said British measures against the pair would serve as a ‘yellow card’ warning that their crimes could be followed by prosecution in international courts.
Ukraine’s 5 AM Coalition has estimated there could range anywhere from 260,000 to 700,000 children who were forcibly taken from their home in eastern Ukraine.
As of June 2025, only 1,359 children have been returned.
The Foreign Office has sanctioned a string of senior officials for their roles in the alleged crimes, including a fresh batch of designations in May.
Helen Maguire MP, Chair of parliament’s RussiaWatch groups; said: ‘Of all the crimes committed by Putin during his illegal war in Ukraine, the abduction of thousands of Ukrainian children is among the most vile.
‘A top priority for The Prime Minister must be joining the EU and Switzerland in sanctioning all those responsible. Those involved in these atrocities must be judged for their crimes against humanity.’
Peschanskaya and Demidov are among two officials being explored in a new exhibition that launched in central London on Wednesday.

Piers Secunda has visited Ukraine and wants to highlight the horrors parts of the country has faced under Russian occupation
Artist Piers Secunda, who has visited Ukraine twice to document Russia’s looting of art and abduction of children, is displaying his artwork alongside a feature length documentary about the trip.
The exhibition will display ‘evidence’ of Russian wrongs from Russian media and is running at the Fitzrovia Gallery until September 6.
What has Russia said?
A spokesperson from the Russian Embassy told WTX: ‘Russia has nothing to do with the so-called “abduction of Ukrainian children”.
‘This politically motivated narrative is exploited by Ukrainian and Western propaganda exclusively to demonise our country.
‘Minors evacuated from areas of active hostilities were saved from being used by Ukrainian troops as human shields and hostages.
‘In effect, it was a rescue mission for the young. Moreover, Russia and Ukraine have established a communication channel to help reunite families.
‘Since the start of the special military operation, 30 minors have been returned to relatives in Russia, and a further 141 have been reunited with families in Ukraine and in third countries. This work is ongoing.
‘Ukraine has a long record of attacks on civilian population, with youngsters increasingly among the casualties. Recent examples speak for themselves.
‘On 22 May, a dormitory in Starobelsk was hit, killing 21 people and injuring 44, most of them aged between 15 and 22. On 3 August, a drone struck a beach in Arkhipo-Osipovka, Krasnodar Region, killing 8 civilians, including 4 minors.
‘Over the past four years in Kherson region alone, 4,400 civilians have been killed or injured, including 130 children. Such assaults are carried out using weapons and intelligence support provided to Kiev by NATO member states, notably the UK.
‘As for brainwashing, it is in Ukraine that so-called “children’s military-patriotic camps” operate, where fighters from the Azov battalion and other nationalist formations indoctrinate Ukrainian children, instilling in them hatred of all that is Russian – language, culture, history, identity.
‘This, however, is something the Western mainstream media turns a blind eye to.’
A spokesperson from the Ukrainian Embassy said the country ‘strongly supports the imposition of sanctions against individuals and entities involved in the forced deportation, indoctrination and militarisation of Ukrainian children from temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine.
‘These actions constitute grave violations of international law and the rights of children.’
The Embassy added: ‘We are confident that the UK shares this principled approach and remains committed to ensuring accountability for those responsible.’
An FCDO spokesperson said: ‘We keep sanctions under close review. It is not appropriate to speculate on any future designations as to do so could reduce the impact of the designations.
‘The UK government has taken action to sanction those supporting Putin’s attempts to forcibly deport and indoctrinate Ukraine’s children and erase their Ukrainian cultural heritage.
‘In May, we announced our fifth sanctions package, targeting those involved in the forced deportation and indoctrination of Ukrainian children, including over 20 new designations.
‘We also announced £1.2m funding to support Ukrainian verification and tracing programmes, bringing our total funding to £4m to help get these children home.
‘The UK is committed to facilitate the return and reintegration of children cruelly deported by Russia.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
NATO concludes Russia bears full responsibility for airspace incursions
NATO concludes Russia bears full responsibility for airspace incursions
Members of NATO concluded that Russia bears “full responsibility” for recent incursions into Polish and Romanian airspace during their meeting on Wednesday.
NATO’s definitive attribution of responsibility to Russia establishes significant international pressure on Moscow, reinforcing collective defence commitments among member states in response to regional security threats.
“NATO allies conclude that Russia bears full responsibility for the recent incursions into Polish and Romanian airspace,” stated a representative following the meeting.
NATO stands with Poland and Romania amid Russian airspace violations

Members of NATO met on Wednesday to discuss recent incursions into Polish and Romanian airspace and concluded that Russia bears “full responsibility” for the incidents.
Karoline Leavitt resigns as White House press secretary amid Trump changes
Media Lens: Karoline Leavitt resigns as White House press secretary amid Trump changes
Karoline Leavitt leaves White House press secretary role.
Karoline Leavitt is leaving her role as Trump’s White House press secretary. This development is reported by PBS and AP News.
What happened
Karoline Leavitt is leaving her role as the White House press secretary under President Trump. Her departure was confirmed by multiple news sources earlier today.
The news comes amid a broader wave of changes within the Trump administration, as various officials have transitioned in and out of key positions. Leavitt’s future plans have not yet been disclosed.
Key facts
- Karoline Leavitt is leaving her role as White House press secretary.
- She served in the Trump administration.
- This announcement was reported by PBS, AP News, and CNBC.
- The news was first made public approximately six hours ago.
- Leavitt’s resignation is a significant development within the Trump White House team.
Where coverage differs
- PBS emphasizes Karoline Leavitt leaving her role, while AP News emphasizes the overall context of her departure from the Trump administration.
- WMUR foregrounds political analysts’ insights on the implications of Leavitt’s exit rather than just the event itself.
- CNBC prioritizes Trump’s comments regarding Leavitt’s resignation over the analysis surrounding her departure.
One story, four angles
PBS – Karoline Leavitt is leaving her role as Trump’s White House press secretary
Publication: PBS | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Neutral | Intensity: 5/10 | Sentiment: 0 | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article reports the resignation of White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, emphasizing the transition in leadership amidst a politically charged environment. It notes her previous roles and the significance of her position within the Trump administration.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the implications of Leavitt’s resignation within the context of the Trump administration.
Framing analysis: The primary foregrounding is on her departure as an event of political significance, alongside a background mention of her qualifications and role. The article avoids moral implications or dire consequences.
Bias: Selection: Details of her previous experience are highlighted, Language: Language is factual and straightforward, Omission: A lack of commentary on the implications of her resignation on Trump’s administration or upcoming policies.
Assessment: The piece maintains a politically focused stance, efficiently detailing the event without bias.
AP News – White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt is leaving the Trump administration
Publication: AP News | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Objective | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: 0 | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article reports on Karoline Leavitt’s resignation from her post, detailing her contributions to the administration and various roles she held prior to becoming press secretary.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is primarily on the transitional aspects of her departure within the Trump administration.
Framing analysis: The article foregrounds her career trajectory and responsibilities, subtly implying the broader consequences of her departure without explicit moral evaluations.
Bias: Selection: Highlights her career achievements, Language: Professional and neutral, Omission: Any discussion about future implications for the Trump administration or potential successors.
Assessment: AP News provides an informative report with an emphasis on the political transition, maintaining neutrality throughout.
WMUR – ‘Sky is the limit’ for Karoline Leavitt: Political analysts weigh-in on Trump White House departure
Publication: WMUR | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Positive | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: +2 | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: This analysis focuses on the potential future opportunities for Karoline Leavitt following her resignation, featuring insights from political analysts who highlight her strengths and future prospects in the political arena.
Publication emphasis: The article emphasizes her potential career advancement and prospects in politics post-resignation.
Framing analysis: The focus is on her future opportunities and the positive aspects of her departure, while her current role within the administration is treated as a transitional phase.
Bias: Selection: Highlights optimistic future possibilities, Language: Uplifting and supportive, Omission: Critiques or potential negatives regarding her time in office or the circumstances of her exit.
Assessment: WMUR presents a favorable angle on Leavitt’s resignation, projecting a positive outlook on her future career in politics.
CNBC – Trump says Karoline Leavitt resigning as White House press secretary
Publication: CNBC | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Direct | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: -1 | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article reports on Trump’s confirmation of Karoline Leavitt’s departure from her role as press secretary, emphasizing the abrupt nature of her resignation amidst ongoing political tensions.
Publication emphasis: The focus is on the circumstances surrounding her resignation and the political context leading to it.
Framing analysis: The piece foregrounds the abruptness of her resignation, suggesting potential instability within the administration; secondary details relate to her contributions and personal background.
Bias: Selection: Highlights the political dynamics around her departure, Language: Firm and assertive, Omission: Limited discussion on her potential future roles or optimistic interpretations of her exit.
Assessment: CNBC delivers a stark account of Leavitt’s resignation, highlighting its implications within the political landscape while casting a critical tone.
Food for thought
PBS employs the strongest legal framing regarding Karoline Leavitt’s departure, describing her resignation as part of a broader trend in the Trump administration that raises questions on governance and accountability. In contrast, AP News adopts the most escalatory tone, implying inner turmoil and disarray within Trump’s team by highlighting the sheer number of recent resignations. While PBS focuses on the implications and potential legal scrutiny, AP emphasizes the chaotic environment, suggesting a critical state of affairs. The differences reflect each outlet’s unique angle on the same event. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
London-area animal rescue burdened with £200,000 bill after cat seizure
Get you up to speed: London-area animal rescue faces $200K bill after cats seized by province
Saving Animals’ Lives Together received notice of a complaint but was not informed about the complainant or the specific nature of the complaint. The organisation has yet to provide further details on the matter.
Saving Animals’ Lives Together is currently reviewing the details of the complaint but has not disclosed the specific nature of the allegations. The organisation has stated it will cooperate fully with any investigation that may follow.
Saving Animals’ Lives Together has acknowledged receipt of a complaint but has not disclosed the identity of the complainant or the details of the complaint. The organisation is awaiting further information to determine its next steps in addressing the issue.
What remains unclear — The identity of the person who made the complaint and the specifics of the complaint itself remain undisclosed.
London-area animal rescue burdened with £200,000 bill after cat seizure

Saving Animals’ Lives Together says it received notice a complaint had been made though it was not told who made it or what it was regarding.
Trump secretly switched planes shortly after credible Iranian missile threat
Get you up to speed: Trump’s secret plane switch took place within a day of credible Iranian missile threat
President Trump was discreetly moved from Air Force One to a different plane via a catering truck in Ankara, Turkey, due to a credible Iranian plot to target the presidential jet with a missile. The decision was made by the National Security Council, the White House Military Office, and the Secret Service as a precaution during the NATO summit.
National security officials coordinated the plane switch involving President Trump with counterparts in Washington, D.C., while the NATO summit was ongoing in Ankara. The operation, which included Trump departing in a C-32A jet to a U.K. military base, was conducted under the scrutiny of multiple intelligence agencies after credible threats from Iran surfaced just before his departure on 8 July 2026.
The National Security Council, the White House Military Office, and the Secret Service coordinated the decision to change President Trump’s transport in response to a credible threat from Iran, with both law enforcement and U.S. officials confirming the plot was detected shortly before his departure from Ankara. Following the incident, Trump expressed on Truth Social his choice to take the older Air Force One “for old time’s sake”, but noted to WTX US News that a different flight was deemed necessary due to ongoing threats against him.
What remains unclear — It is not confirmed whether any potential missile threat against Air Force One has been completely neutralised.
Trump secretly switched planes shortly after credible Iranian missile threat
Washington — Last month’s elaborate ruse that saw President Trump secretly move from Air Force One to another plane by way of a catering truck took place within a day of U.S. and Turkish intelligence picking up on an Iranian plot to fire a missile at the presidential jet, WTX US News has learned.
The decision to shift Mr. Trump to a different plane was made while the annual NATO conference was underway in Ankara, according to two law enforcement officials and a U.S. official. The president had flown into the Turkish capital on a newly retrofitted Boeing 747 donated by the government of Qatar, but an older white-and-blue jet that has served as Air Force One since the 1990s was also on the ground as a support aircraft.
Ahead of Mr. Trump’s July 8 departure from the summit, the National Security Agency, the CIA and Turkey’s MIT intelligence service picked up streams of information about a credible plot by Iran to fire a surface-to-air missile at Air Force One, according to two U.S. officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss sensitive matters.
There were also reports of a team in Turkey tasked with firing the surface-to-air missile at the plane, the U.S. officials said. But after more probes, no team was detected.
As the U.S.-Iran war nears the six-month mark, there is a significant ongoing threat from Iran to kill Mr. Trump, according to the officials.
The president — who has faced multiple attempts on his life in recent years — has acknowledged the risk, calling himself “number one on the kill list for Iran” in a news conference shortly before leaving Ankara.
The National Security Council, the White House Military Office and the Secret Service made the decision to change planes, two law enforcement officials and a U.S. official said. The decision was coordinated with officials in Washington, D.C.
Before Mr. Trump departed Ankara, he said on Truth Social that he would take the older Air Force One over the newer Qatari jet for “old time’s sake.”
Press footage captured him arriving at the airport and climbing up the stairs of the old Air Force One. Then, a few minutes later, an airport catering truck can be seen backing away from the plane and driving off to a U.S. Air Force-operated C-32A jet.
A catering truck is parked alongside the old Air Force One plane on the tarmac prior to departure from Ankara Esenboga Airport in Ankara, Turkey, on July 8, 2026, after a NATO summit attended by President Trump. SAUL LOEB /AFP via Getty Images 
Mr. Trump was inside the catering truck, along with White House aides Natalie Harp, Walt Nauta and Dan Scavino, people familiar with the matter previously told WTX US News. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also joined them on board the C-32A before it flew from Turkey to a U.K. military base.
The plane that was publicly identified as Air Force One flew along the same route, carrying Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, several other top-level White House aides and members of the press corps. Rubio and Bessent were aware that the plane wasn’t carrying the president, sources said, but the reporters and some White House staff were not.
While in the United Kingdom, Mr. Trump shifted to the new, Qatari-donated Air Force One for the second leg of his trip back to D.C.
The use of a decoy aircraft remained a secret until earlier this week, when The Washington Post, WTX US News and other outlets reported on the move.
Law enforcement officials told WTX US News the switch was part of a misdirection effort, but said it was not intended to put certain individuals at greater risk.
Mr. Trump addressed the decision on Tuesday, telling WTX US News’ Nancy Cordes the military and Secret Service “wanted me to go in a different flight” due to threats.
Asked why it was too dangerous for him to fly on Air Force One, but not reporters or his staff, Mr. Trump said: “I think, actually, the plane that I flew on was at greater risk.”
The president told reporters he was not surprised or worried.
“I have a lot of threats,” he said. “Any consequential president has a lot of threats.”
Sara Cook
contributed to this report.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.









