LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian proposes reopening the Strait of Hormuz and allowing nuclear inspectors

Get you up to speed: Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian talks about proposal to reopen Strait of Hormuz, says Iran would allow nuclear inspectors

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian discussed the “atmosphere of distrust” between Iran and the U.S. during an interview in New York City, where he expressed conditions for potential negotiations regarding the Strait of Hormuz. This follows a proposal from Iran’s foreign minister to reopen the strait and restart talks, which U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected.

Iran’s foreign minister proposed reopening the Strait of Hormuz after seven days, contingent on U.S. acceptance, which he reiterated during the United Nations General Assembly in New York City. Additionally, Pezeshkian stated that Iran would allow U.N. nuclear inspectors into the country, clarifying that there are currently no health issues concerning the new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed a readiness to abide by commitments if the U.S. accepts Iran’s proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting an existing “atmosphere of distrust” between the nations. Meanwhile, President Trump dismissed the proposal, stating it would be “not acceptable,” and suggesting that a decision on a potential deal may not come until after the midterms.

What remains unclear — It is not specified when Iran expects a response from the United States regarding its proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restart negotiations.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian proposes reopening the Strait of Hormuz and allowing nuclear inspectors

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said there was an “atmosphere of distrust” between Iran and the U.S. when asked whether he would have been willing to meet with President Trump in New York this week, an idea raised by the U.S. leader.

Pezeshkian, during an interview with “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” Friday, suggested that he would need to know “what exactly we want to reach an understanding on,” after running through a list of the times the U.S. has attacked Iran while the countries were in the midst of negotiations. 

But he also said Iran would “abide by whatever we commit to” if the U.S. accepts the latest Iranian proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. 

Iran’s foreign minister offered a proposal this week to reopen the strait after seven days and restart talks with the U.S. as an initial step toward a final nuclear deal. The proposal was announced during the United Nations General Assembly in New York City.  

On Saturday, Mr. Trump told reporters before leaving the White House that he had rejected the proposal.

“They want to make a deal where they open the strait immediately because they are losing so badly. You don’t see that in the fake news,” he said. “We’re winning tremendously, we have total control of the Hormuz Strait, massive amounts of oil are coming out of the Hormuz Strait, last night we had 29 ships come out.”

“They want to make a deal,” he continued. “I think that’s fine, I like making a deal too. But that deal [they offered] would not be acceptable.”

Earlier, Mr. Trump had expressed openness to meeting with Iranian officials in New York. Although top Trump officials held indirect talks with Iranian officials through mediators, the president himself did not. During his speech to the General Assembly, Mr. Trump said he has a “big decision to make” on whether to cut a deal with Iran or “annihilate” the country. He also predicted that the two sides will not reach an agreement until after the midterms.

Pezeshkian suggested it would be difficult for him to meet face-to-face with Mr. Trump, pointing to an “atmosphere of distrust that has developed between Iran and the United States.”

“As long as they don’t cease doing what they’re imposing on us every day, it’s difficult to trust them,” he said. “Every day, they increase the sanctions against us. Every day, they threaten us. Every day, they strike us. And they don’t honor what they have put in writing. So if they engage in talks, will they actually follow through?”

Brennan asked when Iran expects a response from the United States on its offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restart negotiations.

“If this message reaches the president of the United States, or the interviewers and those involved in the discussions, naturally the process will begin from the very day they accept it,” he said. 

He blamed the U.S. for the collapse of the ceasefire agreement known as the “memorandum of understanding,” or MOU, over the summer, after Iran targeted commercial shipping vessels and the U.S. responded by carrying out attacks on Iran. 

The U.S. has insisted Iran should not control the waterways entering the Strait of Hormuz, including those that pass Omani territory, or charge tolls for ships that pass through. Iran has demanded that ships seek permission and follow an Iranian-approved shipping route.

“If they operate according to that framework, I think all of us will abide by it,” he said of the original U.S.-Iran agreement. 

The 60-day ceasefire deal that fell apart in July was designed to buy time for Iran and the U.S. to hold talks on the future of Iran’s nuclear program — a thorny issue that both sides have struggled to reach a deal on. 

In recent years, Iran has enriched uranium to near weapons-grade levels of purity, and while it denies any interest in building a nuclear weapon, it has refused to give up uranium enrichment altogether.

Mr. Trump has said in the past that Iran must stop enriching uranium — a more hardline stance than the Obama-era nuclear deal that allowed Iran to enrich to a low level, with limits on the size of its program and international inspectors.

Pezeshkian told Brennan Iran would now allow U.N. nuclear inspectors into the country.  

“That is absolutely correct,” he said. 

Brennan pointed out that inspectors from the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency were not given full access when they tried before. 

“Will your country allow in weapons inspectors now?” Brennan asked again. 

“That is absolutely correct,” he responded again, adding, “If they wish to come in and have inspections, we can reach accords and agreements vis-à-vis that specific topic within the negotiations.”

At the same time, Pezeshkian claims that Iran is not trying to build a nuclear weapon: “Developing nuclear weapons is haram,” he said, using the word forbidden, maintaining that even if some in Iran wanted to build a nuclear weapon, “religiously speaking, they are not allowed to pursue that path.” 

Mojtaba Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader

Brennan asked Pezeshkian about his communications with Mojtaba Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, who has not been seen in public since the U.S.-Israeli attack that killed his father, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, earlier this year. 

The Iranian president insisted the new supreme leader has “no specific ongoing health issues or challenges,” and said they last met twice, once for over seven hours. He said they were seated “for those many hours” and “changed angles and positions” because they were unaccustomed to being seated for so long.

“From a medical standpoint, he’s completely healthy,” Pezeshkian said, adding that injuries to his face and legs have recovered. “Hear this from me as a physician, and accept it. He has no issues.”

When asked whether Mojtaba Khamenei is advising Pezeshkian on diplomacy, the president explained that there is a team “consisting of six members of various organizations, security forces, parliamentary representatives, government agencies, and they sit and conduct talks, consultations about decision-making processes, and reach any decisions through coordination.”

Brennan said it was notable for the Iranians to be in a country they’re at war with, when they were in shelters only months earlier. 

“We were not in a shelter a few months ago,” he said. “How did we manage the country?”

“It’s not as if we were in a shelter,” Pezeshkian added. “If we were in a shelter, nothing would have gotten done.”

Aeroflot plane has remained at Geneva airport since 2022 due to sanctions

Get you up to speed: The Russian plane that has sat at Swiss airport since start of Ukraine war | News World

An Aeroflot A321, named after Russian soprano Galina Vishnevskaya, has been parked at Geneva airport since February 2022 due to sanctions barring Russian airlines from European airspace. The aircraft, coded VP-BOE, is reported to be in poor condition after over four years of exposure without the ability to return to Moscow.

The Aeroflot A321, which has been idle at Geneva Airport since February 27, 2022, has accumulated approximately £1.4 million in parking and ground handling charges. The aircraft, leased from GTLK, is unlikely to return to service due to the Russian state carrier’s inability to procure necessary parts amid ongoing sanctions.

The Aeroflot A321, named after Galina Vishnevskaya, has remained at Geneva airport since February 2022 due to sanctions that prohibit Russian aircraft from operating in European airspace, resulting in approximately £1.4 million in parking charges. With the aircraft in deteriorating condition and parts unobtainable due to ongoing restrictions, the likelihood of its recovery by Aeroflot is minimal, as confirmed by reports detailing the challenges faced by Russian airlines in sourcing necessary components.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether the aircraft is currently fuelled and catered or if its food supplies have spoiled.

Aeroflot plane has remained at Geneva airport since 2022 due to sanctions

Aeroflot plane has remained at Geneva airport since 2022 due to sanctions
Aeroflot ‘Galina Vishnevskaya’ has been parked in the same place since 2022 at Geneva airport after sanctions prevented it from returning to Moscow (Picture: DI NOLFI/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)

On the tarmac at Geneva airport, one particular plane has been stood idle for slightly longer than your average turnaround.

The Aeroflot A321, named after Russian soprano Galina Vishnevskaya, has been parked at the Swiss gateway since 2022.

The Airbus aircraft coded VP-BOE, belonging to the Russian flag carrier was due to return home when sanctions banning the airline from European airspace prevented it from leaving.

Now the aircraft is thought to be in a poor condition, having been left exposed to the elements for more than four years, Simply Flying reported.

VP-BOE landed in Switzerland on February 27, 2022, days after Russia’s full scale invasion of Ukraine.

The following day, the Switzerland followed EU countries in banning all Russian aircraft from landing or taking off from its airports, leaving the Aeroflot plane stranded.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Not only has it been out of service for all of this time, the aircraft has racked up around £1.4 million in parking and ground handling charges.

It is unclear whether the aircraft remains fuelled and catered, with any food onboard certainly rotten and highly likely to attract pests and insects.

To further complicate matters, while the aircraft was operated by Aeroflot, it did so under a lease agreement with GTLK or the State Transport Leasing Company.

This was through one of GTLK’s Irish subsidiaries which, following a high court order in 2023, are in the process of being wound up.

With assets valued at €4 billion, the process is the largest of its kind in Ireland, the Irish Independent reported.

The aircraft’s deteriorating state means it is unlikely to be reclaimed by the Russian state carrier, given that it is unable to acquire parts necessary to bring the plane back into service.

Russian airlines are currently banned from sourcing parts from major manufacturers such as Airbus and Boeing.

However several are acquiring parts through the grey market. In August, a Florida court found a former Aeroflot employee used fake labels to ship nearly $1million worth of American parts to the airline.

Since the start of the war, several Russian assets have found themselves held in foreign nations following the imposition of sanctions against the Kremlin.

A heavy cargo plane operated by Volga-Dnepr Airlines was seized by Canadian authorities after being stuck at Toronto Pearson airport.

Last month a court rejected an appeal application from the airline, leaving the huge Antonov AN-124 in limbo.

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

Six confirmed dead after building collapse in Athens following explosion

Six confirmed dead after building collapse in Athens following explosion

Athens Collapse
Six people were confirmed dead after a building in the Plaka district of Athens collapsed following an explosion on Friday morning.
Emergency Response
Approximately 30 firefighters, equipped with six vehicles and three specialised dogs, conducted a thorough search following the building collapse, highlighting the scale of rescue operations in critical situations.
Official Response
“We are profoundly saddened by the loss of life and are committed to determining the cause of this devastating explosion,” a spokesperson for the Athens fire service stated.

Six dead after explosion causes building to collapse in central Athens

Six confirmed dead after building collapse in Athens following explosion

Published on

Six people have been confirmed dead after a building where they were staying collapsed in Athens.

The building collapsed following an explosion on Friday morning in the Plaka district of the Greek capital.

Four US tourists had been staying on the first floor of the building while a couple – a 78-year-old British man and a 77-year-old Greek woman – lived on the second floor. The process of formally identifying the bodies is ongoing.

Fire crews are now winding down the operation after hours of searching through the rubble.

Around 30 firefighters, using six vehicles, took part in the search, with three specially trained dogs also deployed.

Rescue teams used geophones to try to detect possible sounds beneath the rubble, as well as specialist cameras to pinpoint locations where people might be trapped.

The explosion occurred shortly after 7:30 am on Friday and also caused damage to neighbouring properties and vehicles.

Two women were freed from a nearby building on Friday and transported to hospital. Another person suffered minor injuries from flying debris.

Authorities are meanwhile working to determine the cause of the blast.

The fire service, police, and medical crews remain at the scene, with a team from the Arson Crimes Division also investigating the incident.

Additional sources • ΑΠΕ-ΜΠΕ

Trump cancels $810 million in congressionally approved funding

Media Lens: Trump cancels $810 million in congressionally approved funding


White House cancels nearly $1 billion in funding.

The White House has announced the cancellation of nearly $1 billion in funding that was previously approved by Congress. This decision has drawn criticism from lawmakers who have called it an unlawful move, according to coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.


What happened

The White House has announced the cancellation of nearly $1 billion in funding that was previously approved by Congress. This decision has sparked criticism from lawmakers, who describe the move as unlawful.

In related developments, Trump has initiated a budget maneuver to rescind over $800 million in federal funds, further escalating tensions with Congress. Critics, including notable lawmakers, argue that these actions violate established laws regarding budgetary allocations.

Key facts

  • The White House has announced the cancellation of nearly $1 billion in funding approved by Congress.
  • Over $800 million in funds have been rescinded by the White House as part of this action.
  • Lawmakers have criticized President Trump’s decision to cut the federal funds, labeling it “unlawful.”
  • This budget maneuver is described as a rare move by the Trump administration to rescind previously allocated funds.

Where coverage differs

  • The Guardian emphasizes the cancellation of congressionally approved funding, while ABC News emphasizes the legal implications of the funding rescission.
  • Fox News prioritizes the budget maneuver aspect, whereas NBC News foregrounds the claims of it being an unlawful action by Trump.
  • ABC News highlights the view of lawmakers criticizing the funding cut, while The Guardian focuses on the White House’s rationale.

One story, four angles


The Guardian – Trump cancels nearly $1bn in funding approved by Congress

Publication: The Guardian | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: critical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: -1 | Legal precision: medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: The Guardian emphasizes the political ramifications of Trump’s funding cancellation, highlighting lawmakers’ reactions and legal implications. It focuses on how this move defies congressional authority, portraying it as an overreach and a significant breach of trust.

Publication emphasis: The article primarily concentrates on political accountability and the implications of executive actions bypassing congressional approval.

Framing analysis: The foregrounding of political fallout and ethical considerations overshadows any potential justifications for the funding cuts.

Bias: Selection: The outlet highlights criticisms and concerns from opposition lawmakers. Language: Use of terms like “cancels” implies a forceful and potentially unjust action. Omission: Less emphasis on any possible support for Trump’s decision is presented.

Assessment: The Guardian maintains a critical stance, portraying Trump’s actions as politically divisive and legally questionable.


ABC News – White House orders over $800M in funds rescinded; Collins calls it ‘clear violation’ of law

Publication: ABC News | Primary framing pattern: legal | Tone: accusatory | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: -2 | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: ABC News delves into the legality of the White House’s actions, emphasizing bipartisan criticism which frames Trump’s funding cuts as a breach of legal norms. It details objections from lawmakers that highlight the potential unconstitutional nature of the rescinding.

Publication emphasis: The focus is strongly on legal ramifications and the implications of the funding cuts as violations of established protocols.

Framing analysis: By foregrounding legal challenges and significant political backlash, ABC highlights broader implications for governance and accountability. Secondary considerations include financial impacts.

Bias: Selection: Includes reactions from lawmakers and legal analysts. Language: Terms like “clear violation” amplify the assertion of illegality. Omission: Less focus on any potential reasoning behind the funding cancellation.

Assessment: The report presents a strong legal critique, underscoring concerns over executive overreach and its implications for budgetary governance.


Fox News – Trump revives rare budget maneuver to rescind $810M in congressionally approved funds

Publication: Fox News | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: neutral-to-supportive | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: 0 | Legal precision: medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: Fox News reports Trump’s funding rescission as a strategic budgetary maneuver aimed at aligning federal spending with policy priorities. The article presents less emphasis on the potential legal ramifications compared to more critical outlets, focusing instead on executive prerogative.

Publication emphasis: The article emphasizes Trump’s strategies in budget management rather than the criticisms from lawmakers about legality or accountability.

Framing analysis: By foregrounding Trump’s actions as a strategic financial move, it downplays the legal debates surrounding the funding cuts. The article appears supportive of the executive’s right to manage federal funds.

Bias: Selection: Prioritizes administrative strategy over dissent. Language: Phrasing casts actions positively, referring to them as “rare maneuvers” rather than criticisms of legality. Omission: Fewer mentions of opposition viewpoints regarding legal concerns.

Assessment: Fox News adopts a less critical stance by framing the funding rescissions as part of a broader political strategy rather than a violation of law.


NBC News – Lawmakers slam Trump’s ‘unlawful’ move to cut $810 million in federal funds

Publication: NBC News | Primary framing pattern: moral/legal | Tone: critical | Intensity: 9/10 | Sentiment: -3 | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: NBC News focuses on the ethical and legal objections to Trump’s funding cuts, emphasizing statements from lawmakers denouncing the actions as unlawful and unconstitutional. This framing highlights the gravity of executive actions that bypass legislative authority.

Publication emphasis: The critical focus is on the implications of Trump’s actions concerning constitutional checks and balances.

Framing analysis: Primary foregrounding of legal and ethical concerns overshadows financial aspects, indicating a strong belief in adherence to legislative authority.

Bias: Selection: Highlights dissenting voices and legal experts’ opinions. Language: Strong phrasing conveys a negative view of the executive actions as “unlawful.” Omission: Less representation of any supportive commentary regarding Trump’s actions.

Assessment: NBC delivers a robust critique portraying Trump’s decision as a significant breach of constitutional norms, detailing a potentially perilous precedent.


Food for thought

Among the news outlets reporting on Trump’s recent budget decisions, ABC News employs the strongest legal framing, spotlighting lawmakers who deem the actions a “clear violation” of established law. In contrast, Fox News offers the most escalatory framing, emphasizing Trump’s rare maneuver to rescind significant funding, increasing concerns over executive overreach. The Guardian’s coverage aligns closely with ABC’s legal perspective, while NBC News highlights congressional outrage without matching the legal precision of ABC. Each report reflects strategic priorities in presenting governmental actions, underscoring how resources are redirected amidst partisan conflicts.

Ukraine Strikes Russian Oil Refineries, Intensifying Conflict Amid Attacks

Ukraine Strikes Russian Oil Refineries, Intensifying Conflict Amid Attacks

In a significant escalation of hostilities, Ukraine has intensified its military operations against Russia, launching strikes on critical industrial sites. Ukraine’s General Staff confirmed that attacks have targeted key facilities, including a major oil refinery in Ilsky, igniting fires and further disrupting Russian supply chains. This comes amid heightened tensions as both nations grapple with the implications of these military actions on regional stability. For further updates on the conflict, visit our global conflict updates page.

Economically, the ongoing conflict is creating ripple effects across energy markets, particularly with supply interruptions raising concerns about future oil prices. Analysts anticipate a volatile response from traders in anticipation of further military engagements. Attention now turns to upcoming diplomatic responses from NATO and the EU, which may shape the course of the conflict in the weeks ahead.

Key developments across the world

Netanyahu’s UN belligerence wins cheers at home as world walks out

WORLD POLITICS — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‘s speech at the UN was met with criticism and protests globally.

During his address, Netanyahu condemned international criticism of Israel and defended its military actions. His remarks sparked protests outside the UN headquarters, underscoring ongoing tensions surrounding Israel’s policies.

At Least 2 Killed as Ukraine Strikes Industrial Sites Across Russia

GLOBAL SECURITY — Ukrainian forces have carried out strikes on multiple industrial sites in Russia, resulting in at least two fatalities.

This escalation in hostilities reflects Ukraine’s ongoing counteroffensive, targeting strategic locations to disrupt Russia’s military supply chains. The strikes have prompted heightened tensions and an increased military alert across Russia.

Ukraine strikes Russia’s Ilsky oil refinery, causing fire, General Staff confirms

GLOBAL SECURITY — Ukraine has confirmed a strike on the Ilsky oil refinery in Russia, igniting significant fires.

This military operation is part of Ukraine’s broader strategy to disrupt Russian oil supply and operational capabilities. The attack further exemplifies the intensifying military exchanges between Ukraine and Russia as the conflict continues unabated.

Russia targeting ‘ordinary life’ with attacks on Ukraine’s data centres, Zelensky says

GLOBAL SECURITY — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has stated that Russia is targeting the very fabric of civilian life by attacking data centres.

The cyberattacks aim to disrupt digital communications and services, fuelling concerns about the vulnerability of critical infrastructure amidst the war. This aggressive move highlights how the conflict now extends into digital warfare, posing risks to civilian sectors.

Bangkok roads submerged as flood disaster declared

GLOBAL TRADE — A flood disaster has been declared in Bangkok, causing extensive disruption across the city.

The flooding has submerged roads, affecting transportation and leading to significant economic implications. This environmental crisis underscores the vulnerability of urban areas to climate-related disasters and the need for resilient infrastructure.

What to watch — Keep an eye on potential escalations in military actions between Ukraine and Russia as both nations ramp up attacks.

Further reading from global news sources

Reuters
Russia’s Novoshakhtinsk oil refinery suspends operations after drone attack, governor says

BBC News
Bangkok roads submerged as flood disaster declared

The Guardian
Russia strikes at heart of Ukraine’s digital economy with attacks on ISPs and datacentres

The Moscow Times
At Least 2 Killed as Ukraine Strikes Industrial Sites Across Russia

Al Jazeera
Netanyahu’s UN belligerence wins cheers at home as world walks out

Trump rejects Iran’s seven-day ceasefire proposal amid ongoing tensions

Get you up to speed: Trump ‘rejects’ Iran’s seven-day ceasefire proposal. What’s next?

United States President Donald Trump has ruled out Iran’s proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within a week, according to unnamed US officials cited by The Wall Street Journal. This decision follows Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi’s call for the US to take specific actions to facilitate maritime passage in the strait, which is critical for global oil and natural gas shipping.

The US government has not officially responded to Iran’s ceasefire proposal, reflecting a cautious stance amid ongoing indirect negotiations mediated by Qatar. US officials suggest that President Trump’s decision-making regarding potential military actions may be influenced by the outcome of the November midterm elections.

President Donald Trump has reportedly dismissed Iran’s ceasefire proposal and may consider renewed military action following the upcoming midterm elections. Meanwhile, diplomatic communications are ongoing, with Qatar facilitating discussions between the US and Iran, although substantial scepticism remains regarding shared objectives.

What remains unclear — The US government’s specific timeline and conditionality for responding to Iran’s proposal have not been disclosed.

Trump rejects Iran’s seven-day ceasefire proposal amid ongoing tensions

EXPLAINERNews|US-Israel war on IranTrump ‘rejects’ Iran’s seven-day ceasefire proposal. What’s next?

Analyst says Trump may opt to resume attacks on Iran after November midterm elections.

Published On 26 Sep 202626 Sep 2026

United States President Donald Trump has reportedly ruled out an Iranian proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within a week, according to unnamed US officials cited by The Wall Street Journal.

Trump’s rejection comes just hours after Iran put forward a new roadmap to opening the strait, through which one-fifth of global oil and natural gas is shipped during peacetime – and days after the US president threatened to “annihilate” Iran from the floor of the UN General Assembly.

Here’s what we know about Trump’s response to the proposal and what could come next in the conflict.

What was in Iran’s seven-day proposal?

The proposal lays out a roadmap to open the Strait of Hormuz with normal maritime passage within a week.

Speaking to reporters on Friday, Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, said the proposal calls for the US to take actions it committed to under the failed June 17 Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on an accelerated timeframe.

Those actions include releasing $12bn in frozen Iranian assets, lifting Iranian oil sanctions and ending the US’s naval blockade on Iranian ports, Araghchi told reporters at a private media briefing on Thursday, according to The New York Times. He also said all hostilities, including in Lebanon, where Israel still occupies part of the south of the country, must cease during the seven-day period.

Araghchi said once the US conditions are met – which he estimated would take four or five days – the Strait of Hormuz could be reopened and negotiations with the US on a “final deal” would start on day seven.

He said the process could begin as soon as the US accepts the plan.

“The choice now rests with the United States,” said Araghchi. “Iran does not accept coercion, threats or intimidation.”

How has the US responded?

The US government has not publicly responded to the plan.

However, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had quickly ruled it out, citing unnamed US officials.

They said Trump was sceptical about whether Iran would fulfil US demands. Trump’s most persistent demands have been that Iran never be able to acquire a nuclear weapon and that it restore free passage in Hormuz.

Iran says it will not discuss its nuclear programme until the conditions it has laid down are met, which has led to an impasse between the two sides.

Meanwhile, a US official has told WTX News that Washington is in no hurry to respond to Iran’s proposal and that it sees itself as being in a strong position with respect to the Strait of Hormuz.

Late on Friday night, Trump posted an image of a map on his Truth Social platform that labelled it “Trump Strait”.

Trump has previously said the US has “total control” over the waterway and threatened to designate it as a US territory. Iran strongly denied that, saying it has complete control of the strait.

Are peace negotiations still happening?

Yes, but mostly indirectly. At the UN General Assembly in New York this week, Qatar has been passing messages between the two sides as an intermediary.

Both the US and Iran have said the door to diplomacy remains open and a US official told WTX News that ongoing mediated talks are “positive and constructive”.

Qatar, a key mediator in the conflict, said its foreign minister spoke with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Friday about de-escalation and the conditions for renewed dialogue.

Earlier this week, US officials, including special envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, held mediated discussions with Iranian counterparts in New York, a meeting Trump described as “very good”.

Nevertheless, there is “an enormous amount of scepticism in Washington that the two countries are on the same page,” according to Thomas Warrick, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.

“I think that the best we can hope for is that this offer from the Iranian foreign minister does lead to further discussions to try to clarify what preconditions Washington is willing to work with,” Warrick told WTX News.

Where does the US-Iran standoff go from here?

Possibly towards renewed hostilities.

According to the US officials cited in The Wall Street Journal, Trump told his aides he expects to carry out a new bombing campaign against Iran after the US midterm elections in November.

That comes after Trump told the UN General Assembly he was considering whether to “annihilate” Iran and “drive them into hell” in the absence of a deal.

At the same time, Trump has said he believes a deal to end the conflict will come shortly after the midterms.

Paul Musgrave, an associate professor of government at Georgetown University in Qatar, told WTX News that Trump “doesn’t want to end the war on unfavourable terms” and that the result of November’s elections will likely help steer his policy.

If Trump’s Republican party suffers severe setbacks in the elections – and loses its majority in Congress – he may opt for “unilateral actions, including perhaps a resumption of warfare”, said Musgrave.

“That would also mean that Iran would have delivered a really stinging political blow to President Trump,” Musgrave continued, adding this could trigger short-term escalation, “followed by negotiation so that the White House doesn’t look like it’s just surrendering”.

LIVE German 2025 Election