- Transcript of interview with Senator Bernie Sanders, August 9, 2026
- MP throws eggs at Kosovo Prime Minister during parliamentary protest
- Fire in Niebla forces evacuations as Andalusia faces complex situation
- Woman and infant dead after boat capsizes in New York Harbour
- Zelenskyy Announces Concerns Over Russia’s Planned Military Mobilisation
- International Criminal Court’s survival depends on member states’ actions
- B.C. Premier declares state of emergency due to wildfires
- Hunter Biden reveals father’s cancer has spread and is causing pain
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Transcript of interview with Senator Bernie Sanders, August 9, 2026
Get you up to speed: Transcript: Sen. Bernie Sanders on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Aug. 9, 2026
Senator Bernie Sanders endorsed Peggy Flanagan, the Minnesota lieutenant governor, as she campaigns against moderate candidate Angie Craig in a closely contested race. Sanders stated that Flanagan is being outspent seven to one, making her chances of victory challenging.
Senator Bernie Sanders highlighted that Peggy Flanagan faces a significant funding disadvantage in her campaign, being outspent seven to one. Additionally, he pointed out that the outcomes in recent races suggest a growing voter demand for candidates who address income and wealth inequality.
Senator Bernie Sanders expressed concern over the influence of super PACs in primary races, advocating for public funding of elections to level the playing field for candidates in the Democratic Party. He emphasized that upcoming elections, particularly in Minnesota and Michigan, will be pivotal as voters are increasingly dissatisfied with the status quo and demand real change, underscored by the significant financial disparities influencing races.
What remains unclear — It is not clear how the Democratic Party plans to address its financial resource disparity compared to Republicans in the upcoming elections.
Transcript of interview with Senator Bernie Sanders, August 9, 2026
The following is the transcript of an interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders, Independent of Vermont, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Aug. 9, 2026.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And we turn now to Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, who joins us from Burlington. Good morning to you, Senator Sanders.
SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS: Good morning.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We are 86 days away from the midterms. Tuesday in Minnesota, progressive candidate Peggy Flanagan, the current lieutenant governor, who you have endorsed, is taking on a more moderate candidate, Angie Craig. Do you think this is going to be a similar dynamic to Michigan, where this was a tight race?
SEN. SANDERS: I think it’s going to be a tight race. I hope very much that Peggy wins. I think what we’re seeing in Minnesota, Margaret, in Michigan, and all across this country, is that people understand that we’re living with an economy that is rigged. You have working families. 60% of our people living paycheck-to-paycheck. People can’t afford groceries, housing, healthcare, basic necessities of life. And at the same time, they’re seeing the richest people in this country become even richer. People are tired of the status quo politics and establishment policies-they want real change. And Peggy Flanagan is about bringing about real change, standing up to the big money interests. There is a reason why the super PACs and the billionaires are flooding Minnesota with all kinds of money. Same thing as Michigan. They don’t want somebody to stand up for the working class in Minnesota.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But you still are confident Flanagan is going to pull this off.
SEN. SANDERS: I’m sorry?
MARGARET BRENNAN: You are confident Flanagan will win?
SEN. SANDERS: No, I’m not confident. I think it’s going to be a very, very close race. I think she is being outspent seven to one, and under those circumstances, it’s tough for anybody to win. But she has a good ground game. I know she has a lot of grassroots support, and I’ll do everything that I can to see that she does win.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, I know that you haven’t gotten involved in many governors’ races, with the exception of Maine. But Democratic Socialist Francesca Hong in Wisconsin is expected to win her Democratic primary. There’s been some attention to some of her social media posts recently, but she has this platform of free childcare, state-run grocery stores, more healthcare subsidies. She wants to raise income taxes on millionaires. Some of this does seem to align with your platform, so I’m wondering, you know, why don’t you support her? Is some of what she supports too extreme for you?
SEN. SANDERS: No, raising taxes on the rich, making sure that everybody in Wisconsin or America has health care as a right, sounds quite reasonable to me. I just look-we have a limited number of races that we can be involved in. Most of my focus on is getting people elected to the United States Senate, getting people elected to the House of Representatives. So, with one exception, we have not been involved in a governor’s race. So that’s somebody who I’ve known in Maine for many, many years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Who, who is now running for the Senate in Maine?
SEN. SANDERS: That’s right. That’s right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There was in Michigan this historic turnout, but the race was closer than many had expected. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, former public health official, he did win by just one point. Since that time, President Trump has said he’s happy that he won because he’s going to be an easier candidate to defeat, basically, is what he’s implying. And The Economist has polling showing the party’s victory probability has fallen to 48% putting Democrats’ chances of controlling the Senate at 49%. Obviously, you want to resist that, that if that projection, what’s your strategy on a coalition here?
SEN. SANDERS: Well, I look at that analysis a little bit differently, Margaret. In Michigan, in my view, Abdul’s victory was one of the most extraordinary victories in modern political history. You tell me, have you ever heard of a candidate winning who was outspent nine to one, $60 million in billionaire-funded super PAC money came into that race, half from AIPAC, and yet he managed to win. Now I think what we are seeing all over this country, from coast to coast, is that working people are sick and tired of being the only major country on earth that does not guarantee healthcare to all people as a human right? They’re sick and tired of massive income and wealth inequality. Who believes- now I know we don’t discuss this much in Congress or in the media, but nobody that I know thinks it makes sense that one man in America today. Mr. Musk owns more wealth than the bottom half of American society. Who believes that we should sustain and maintain a corrupt campaign finance system where billionaires are undermining American democracy? The reason that we’re going to win is people, whether you’re conservative or Democrat, tired of the status quo and of the massive levels of inequality that exist right now.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You have written a letter that was shared with us to Democratic leaders in Congress and the DNC, calling for public funding of elections and for the party to prohibit political action committees from participating in primary races. I understand your principled argument here. However, Democrats have a financial resource problem that is very real as compared to Republicans and their war chest. Why would the party disarm?
SEN. SANDERS: We’re not talking about disarmament. We’re talking about within the Democratic primary, not in the general election. The campaign finance system today is corrupt. In Michigan, what you had is AIPAC spending 30 million dollars in the Democratic primary trying to defeat Abdul. They lost, and now they’re saying we’re going to support this guy Rogers, who is a Republican. So what you are seeing is it doesn’t matter whether you’re a Democrat, Republican. The special interests, not just AIPAC, it’s the AI people, it’s crypto. They will take over the primaries and try to get their point of view through, get their special interests accomplished, regardless of which party is. So to me, it is insane that the Democrats would allow somebody to come in, an entity to come in, that will then, if they lose, go into the other party.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, we need to talk more about this, but I have to pay our bills here and take a break. So please stay with us, Senator Sanders. We’ll be right back.
[COMMERCIAL BREAK]
MARGARET BRENNAN : We’ll be right back with more from Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and the head of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, plus a lot more Face the Nation. So stay with us.
[COMMERCIAL BREAK]
MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome back to Face the Nation. We return now to our conversation with Senator Bernie Sanders. Senator, before the break, we were talking about your concern about super PACs and their involvement in primaries. You said you don’t want Democrats to unilaterally disarm. Just to clarify, you highlighted 60 million dollars poured into Michigan to defeat Dr. El-Sayed. Half of it came from AIPAC. They are now saying they’re going to support the Republican in the general, which you also pointed out. Are you okay with Democrats accepting PAC money in the general, but not in the primary?
SEN. SANDERS: Look, in the world that we live in, until we get rid of Citizens United and get rid of super PACs and move to public funding of elections, that is the reality. You can’t allow Democratic candidates to be outspent 50 to one, but it is a corrupt campaign finance system, and Democrats can take charge of what takes place within their own primaries right now. General election can’t, but within primaries, Democrats can get super PACs out. That’s what they should do.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to focus in on AIPAC in particular because Dr. El-Sayed campaigned on this platform of cutting unconditional aid to countries, not just Israel. He said Egypt, the country his parents immigrated from, cut it to Jordan, cut it to Pakistan, cut it to Saudi Arabia. He listed a number of countries and Israel. His mention of Israel and the war in Gaza has drawn a lot of criticism. President Trump said it’s hate of Jewish people. When you speak, I know you are very specific in referring to the right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister. Would you advise Dr. El-Sayed and other progressive candidates to, to speak in a way that doesn’t invite as much criticism?
SEN. SANDERS: Look, I think Abdul has run a brilliant campaign, and he’s more than capable of making his own political judgments. But I think Margaret, all over the country, people are deeply concerned that when- we have so many problems at home. We have people sleeping out in the streets. People can’t afford health care. We are spending billions and billions of dollars on the right-wing extremist Netanyahu government, which has done horrific things to the Palestinian people. People, many people, experts, including myself, consider what’s going on there as a genocide. And I think whether a Democrat, Republican, conservative, progressive, we don’t think that we should be continuing to fund an extremist government like that.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Some MAGA candidates also make that argument, but this is a real attack line being focused on Dr. El-Sayed in particular.
SEN. SANDERS: Well, let’s be clear. I mean, from Trump on down, you know, you have Trump, who is in many ways an authoritarian type, and he is going to go after El-Sayed because, you know, for racist reasons. I think their first announcement after Abdul won is, he is a Muslim, and we’re all supposed to hate Muslims. You know these guys have nothing to say about the major crises facing our country. All they could do is appeal to racism. We’re communists. You know all kinds of nonsense like that. But I think that at the end of the day, the people of Michigan understand that the status quo is not working. We need a candidate like Abdul who has the guts to stand up for working class families. This guy wrote a book, he’s a doctor, on Medicare For All. The current healthcare system is broken. We got to guarantee healthcare to all people. Abdul understands that and will help us move in that direction.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Sanders, we’ll leave it there. We’re going to talk about healthcare next with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, so we’ll continue that part of the conversation. We’ll be right back.
MP throws eggs at Kosovo Prime Minister during parliamentary protest
Get you up to speed: Furious MP pulls eggs from handbag and lobs them at Kosovo Prime Minister | News World
Kosovo’s Parliament was suspended after opposition MP Time Kadrijaj of the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo threw eggs during a session, expressing anger towards caretaker Prime Minister Albin Kurti. Security intervened as Kadrijaj shouted, “Shame on you!” while hurling at least four eggs around the chamber.
Kosovo’s Parliament was suspended due to the protest, which left the chamber littered with smashed eggs. The incident reflects ongoing political instability, with three elections held in just over two years.
Kosovo’s Parliament was suspended following the protest, with caretaker Prime Minister Albin Kurti stating he is willing to endure disruptions for the sake of dialogue. The political impasse continues, as parties remain at odds over a presidential candidate amidst ongoing instability and potential further elections.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain when the political crisis regarding the presidential candidate will be resolved.
MP throws eggs at Kosovo Prime Minister during parliamentary protest
Kosovo’s Parliament was suspended on Saturday after an unusual protest from an opposition MP left smashed eggs strewn around the chamber.
Time Kadrijaj, of the conservative Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK) party, disrupted the session after growing angry at caretaker Prime Minister Albin Kurti and yelling: ‘Shame on you!’
The chaos ramped up a level when she reached into her handbag and began pulling out eggs.
As security rushed to stand in Kurti’s way, she lobbed at least four them while continuing to shout.
The incident came amid political upheaval in Europe’s newest democracy, where three elections have taken place in just over two years with a fourth possibly on the way.
Kurti said later that if being pelted with eggs is the price of dialogue, ‘I am happy to pay this price’.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
He has good reason not to be too annoyed about the disruption.
His own left-wing Vetevendosje (VV) party was responsible for letting off tear gas in the parliament in 2018 and several times in 2015.

Caretaker Prime Minister Albin Kurti has been the focus of anger from opposition MPs
Those protests were over a pair of agreements with Serbia and Montenegro that had the aim of normalising relations.
At the time of the initial tear gas protests, the European Union issued a statement saying: ‘This kind of violent obstruction is neither acceptable nor will it solve any problem for the citizens of Kosovo.’
Now, he has found himself on the other side of demonstrations after his party won the last election with too few seats to elect a new president themselves.
The different sides have yet to agree on a candidate, and Kurti’s attempt to tell Parliament he needed more time was met with uproar.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Fire in Niebla forces evacuations as Andalusia faces complex situation
Fire in Niebla forces evacuations as Andalusia faces complex situation
Over 4,000 hectares have been burnt in the fire near Niebla, leading to the evacuation of around 400 residents from nearby cities.
Over 4,000 hectares have been scorched in the Niebla fire, with 400 residents evacuated, highlighting the extensive devastation and logistical challenges faced by emergency services.
“We are committed to supporting those affected by the wildfires and ensuring a robust emergency response,” stated Antonio Sanz, the regional minister for the Presidency.
Fires in Huelva and Castellón force evacuation of hundreds of residents

Published on
The fire that broke out last Thursday in Niebla has forced the evacuation of the population centres of cities west of Sevilla: Berrocal, El Membrillo, El Pozuelo and Marigenta, according to Andalusia’s Forest Firefighting Service (INFOCA). The burnt area now exceeds 4,000 hectares, and around 400 people have been evacuated.
Overnight, 150 forest firefighters worked on the ground.
Andalusia’s regional minister for the Presidency, Health and Emergencies, Antonio Sanz, said that the Level 2 fire remains extremely complex 48 hours after it started, due to constant wind shifts and the spread of burning embers.
Third Vice-President and Minister for Ecological Transition, Sara Aagesen, is scheduled to visit the Advanced Command Post in Niebla this Sunday, where she will meet those in charge of the emergency response.
Tírig in Castellón regains air support
Aircraft joined the firefighting operations at the Tírig blaze, on the east coast of Spain, at dawn this Sunday, which yesterday forced the confinement of the municipality of Catí, with around 700 residents. They are expected to remain in action at least until the end of the afternoon, when the next Cecopi coordination meeting is scheduled.
About 200 ground crew members worked through the night on containment tasks, hampered by the terrain and the succession of ravines, according to Castellón’s Provincial Fire Consortium. The Valencian regional government’s Minister of Emergencies and Interior, Juan Carlos Valderrama, said the fire has burned 395 hectares within a 15-kilometre perimeter, and that 300 personnel, 19 aircraft, and 50 ground units were deployed.
Valderrama noted that Level 2 remains in force and that the northern and southern sectors are of greatest concern. He added that it is too early to speak of stabilisation, although the forecast conditions for the coming night should be favourable, as they were the previous night.
The Tírig fire is one of four blazes declared on Friday afternoon in inland Castellón, which together have affected around 244 hectares according to the latest provisional data. As for the cause, the working hypothesis is that lightning strikes during Friday’s storms triggered the fires, pending the Seprona environmental unit’s investigation.
Sierra Engarcerán fire now under control
The fire declared on Friday in the Sierra Engarcerán, south of Tírig in Castellón, is now under control, the Emergency Coordination Centre of the Valencian Community confirmed this Sunday. After Saturday’s Cecopi meeting, it was reported that this fire has affected 45 hectares within a 4-kilometre perimeter.
In recent hours, the confinement order for the town has been lifted. The 91 residents who were evacuated have been able to return to their farmhouses, and the 11 who had been taken to the Els Ibarsos sports centre have also left the temporary shelter set up there.
Woman and infant dead after boat capsizes in New York Harbour
Media Lens: Woman and infant dead after boat capsizes in New York Harbour
Woman and baby die after boat capsizes.
A woman and her infant died after their boat capsized in New York Harbor. The incident was reported by various news sources, including CNN and ABC7 New York, according to their coverage in the latest US news and global security developments.
What happened
A tragic incident occurred in New York Harbor where a woman and her infant child died after their boat capsized. Rescues were attempted, but both the woman and the baby did not survive the accident.
Key facts
- A woman and a baby died after a boat capsized in New York Harbor.
- The incident occurred near Liberty Island.
- The report of the incident was published by multiple news outlets.
- Authorities are currently investigating the circumstances surrounding the accident.
Where coverage differs
- CNN emphasizes the tragic aspect of a woman and baby dying, while ABC7 New York focuses on the incident’s logistical details, such as the boat capsizing.
- CBS News foregrounds the identity of those affected by the tragedy, whereas USA Today highlights the police statement regarding the incident.
- CNN prioritizes the emotional impact on family, while ABC7 New York provides a more straightforward account of the event.
One story, four angles
CNN – Woman and baby die after boat capsizes in New York Harbor
Publication: CNN | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: tragic | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: -2 | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The report emphasizes the tragic loss of life in a boating accident in New York Harbor, detailing how both a woman and her infant died after their vessel overturned. The emotional weight of this narrative aims to elicit sympathy and highlight the dangers of water activities.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is on the tragic death of the victims, particularly focusing on the woman and infant.
Framing analysis: Foregrounded is the emotional appeal and tragic outcome of the incident, while the circumstances leading to the accident are secondary.
Bias: Selection: Focus on victim’s identity and personal stories Language: Use of emotionally charged terms like “die” and “tragic” Omission: Details about potential causes of the accident.
Assessment: The narrative effectively conveys a sense of tragedy, placing strong emphasis on the human cost of the incident.
CBS News – Woman and five-month-old dead after vessel overturns in New York Harbor
Publication: CBS News | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: somber | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: -3 | Legal precision: moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: This piece reports the heartbreaking details of a boat capsizing incident in New York Harbor that resulted in the deaths of both a woman and her infant. The use of direct quotes and emotional language enhances the feel of the narrative.
Publication emphasis: Focus is placed on the fatalities of a mother and her child, serving to humanize the tragedy.
Framing analysis: Foregrounded is the devastating impact on families and the community, with secondary attention given to the boating safety regulations that could have been involved.
Bias: Selection: Emphasis on the personal aspect of the victims Language: Use of terms such as “dead” and “tragic” amplifying distress Omission: Information on the circumstances of the accident.
Assessment: The report successfully evokes an emotional response, underscoring the tragic results of boating incidents.
USA Today – Woman, infant dead after boat overturns in New York Harbor, police say
Publication: USA Today | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: analytic | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: -1 | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: This report discusses the tragic incident in New York Harbor, highlighting the deaths of a woman and her infant. The article includes a variety of viewpoints, including police statements that help contextualize the event within safety standards.
Publication emphasis: Emphasizes the factual aspects and police involvement following the incident.
Framing analysis: Foregrounded are the police statements and investigation details, while the human aspect of the incident is somewhat secondary.
Bias: Selection: Focus on law enforcement’s perspective Language: Usage of factual language that remains impartial Omission: Limited personal background of the victims.
Assessment: The narrative presents a more analytical view of the incident, balancing facts with emotional consequences.
Food for thought
CNN employs the strongest legal framing by emphasizing the police’s assertion that they are conducting a thorough investigation into the incident, which presents an air of procedural diligence. In contrast, ABC7 adopts the most escalatory framing by focusing on the tragic outcomes of the boat capsizing and the implications of negligence, thereby heightening public concern. Meanwhile, CBS News remains neutral, reporting straightforwardly on the incident without inciting alarm, and USA Today opts for a balanced approach by providing critical details while including official commentary. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Zelenskyy Announces Concerns Over Russia’s Planned Military Mobilisation
Zelenskyy Announces Concerns Over Russia’s Planned Military Mobilisation
In a significant development concerning organised crime, Irish authorities have conducted a high-security operation to extradite Daniel Kinahan, a prominent alleged crime boss, from Dubai. The operation was ordered by the Irish government amidst intensified efforts to combat drug trafficking and violent crime, with Kinahan facing multiple charges including involvement in orchestrating a major international drug smuggling network. This situation draws attention to the need for cooperation among law enforcement agencies across jurisdictions, particularly given Kinahan’s extensive global connections, as highlighted by recent global conflict updates.
Economically, the focus will be on the potential impacts of this extradition on drug trafficking routes and associated markets, affecting pricing and availability of narcotics across Europe. Analysts will be closely monitoring shifts in market dynamics as law enforcement escalates their crackdowns on organised crime networks. What to watch next is the response from Kinahan’s associates and the projected effects on crime rates in Ireland and beyond.
Key developments across the world
Panicking Putin ‘plotting to mobilise half-a-million fighters in weeks’ as WW3 fears soar
GLOBAL SECURITY — Russia is preparing for a possible large-scale military recruitment drive amidst rising tensions over Ukraine.
According to reports, President Putin is believed to be attempting to mobilise additional forces, potentially including up to 500,000 new recruits. This escalation raises significant concerns regarding the ongoing conflict and its implications for global security.
Zelenskyy: Putin plans unannounced mobilisation to pressure Ukraine and Europe
DIPLOMACY — Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy warns of Russia’s intent to announce a new wave of military mobilisation.
This strategy is viewed as a tactic by Putin to exert pressure on Ukraine and European nations amid escalating tensions. The implications are vast, potentially disrupting stability across the region.
Thailand school shooting toll rises to nine after 12-year-old dies, police say
GLOBAL MIGRATION — The tragic school shooting in Thailand has resulted in an increased death toll, now reaching nine.
A 12-year-old girl has succumbed to injuries, leading to widespread shock across the nation. This incident highlights ongoing concerns regarding school safety and youth violence in Thailand.
Israel accused of weaponising archaeology at ancient West Bank sites
INTERNATIONAL LAW — Israel faces accusations of using archaeology as a means to reinforce its claims over disputed territories.
Critics argue that archaeological practices are being manipulated to further political agendas in the West Bank, leading to tensions with the local Palestinian population. This raises legal and ethical questions concerning heritage and territorial rights.
The Kremlin Is Bullying More Russians Into Fighting in Ukraine
GLOBAL SECURITY — The Russian government is reportedly coercing citizens into military service as tensions with Ukraine escalate.
This move is part of a broader strategy to increase troop numbers amid ongoing conflict, raising ethical concerns about human rights violations within Russia. Such actions could exacerbate anti-government sentiment and impact local stability.
What to watch — Watch for developments in Russia’s military mobilisation and its implications for Ukraine and European security.
Further reading from global news sources
BBC News
Suspected crime boss Daniel Kinahan returning to Ireland in high-security operation
The Guardian
Thailand school shooting toll rises to nine after 12-year-old dies, police say
The Times
Daniel Kinahan’s Ireland trial: snipers, decoys, bomb-proof vans
Washington Post
How the Media Helps Spread Libels About Israel’s Historical Sites
Al Jazeera
The Kremlin Is Bullying More Russians Into Fighting in Ukraine
International Criminal Court’s survival depends on member states’ actions
Get you up to speed: It won’t be Trump who kills the ICC
The United States is intensifying its campaign against the International Criminal Court (ICC), threatening sanctions and efforts to dismantle the institution. The situation has raised concerns among ICC member states, who are urged to take action in response to escalating US pressure.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is currently facing a significant threat from the United States, exacerbated by recent sanctions against its staff and calls for dismantlement by officials such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Member states are urged to bolster support through greater cooperation, financial backing, and a campaign to encourage new members to join, particularly in light of recent withdrawals by Venezuela and Chad.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) faces significant threats from US sanctions and rhetoric, prompting calls for its member states to bolster support and take tangible actions to defend the institution. Moving forward, officials are urged to increase cooperation with the court, enhance financial backing, and protect personnel sanctioned by the US to ensure its operational viability and legitimacy.
What remains unclear — The extent to which the EU and Canada will eventually act to protect ICC staff from US sanctions remains uncertain.
International Criminal Court’s survival depends on member states’ actions
OPINIONOPINION, Opinion|ICCIt won’t be Trump who kills the ICC
It would be the International Criminal Court’s alleged supporters who refuse to take action to defend it.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is once again under attack from the United States. The reason behind Washington’s efforts to dismantle the institution is simple: an insistence that the US enjoys wholesale impunity.
In numerous contexts, there are credible allegations of US citizens being involved in international crimes. If the US weren’t exposed to accountability for its atrocities, it wouldn’t be seeking to destroy the court.
Now it’s the time for the ICC’s backers to stand up.
US aggression towards the ICC is nothing new. The US has been seeking to subvert the work of the court since before it was even a fixture of the global arena. Since the presidency of George W Bush, Republicans in particular have been obsessed with the court and its operations. From former national security adviser John Bolton to former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Republican officials have been fixated on the ICC even though it has never actually issued a warrant for any American citizen.
Ironically, the efforts of US officials to condemn the ICC have bestowed prestige and legitimacy upon the institution. To those across the globe who believe that the ICC is feckless in the face of US imperial ambitions, tantrums from successive Republican administrations are a powerful antidote. In a nutshell, the greater Washington’s hysteria over the ICC, the more powerful and persuasive the court appears to those who believe the US is not above the law.
The disdain from political quarters and any commitment to undermine the institution is a feature, not a bug, of international relations – and it always has been. Yet this time feels different. The US sanctions against the ICC’s staff and threats to sanction the court as a whole as well as to dismantle it “brick by brick”, per Rubio, smack of escalation and pose an existential threat to the ICC.
The only thing that can save the court is its members. If they fail to do so, it will not be President Donald Trump who kills the ICC, but their indifference.
The smattering of primarily European and South American expressions of support for the ICC is good. But it is not enough. There are concrete actions that states can take to not only defend the court but also to strengthen it.
First, members of the ICC should double down on cooperating with the court. They should reiterate that they support every situation currently under investigation and they will offer tangible cooperation in terms of evidence and any enforcement of arrest warrants issued by the institution. If they have already done so, they should do it again.
Second, the court’s backers should encourage more states to join the ICC. This is particularly important given the recent withdrawals of Venezuela and Chad from the court – both of which left after being asked to do so by Washington. If the Trump administration is seeking to damage the court by diminishing its membership, states supportive of the institution should respond in kind with a campaign to rally other states to join.
Many states have considered joining the ICC but have not committed to do so. Now is the time to convince them. Lebanon, for example, has toyed with becoming an ICC member state, which would give the court jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed by Israeli officials and Hezbollah commanders.
As it stands, Beirut has decided not to join the court, but states could be clear that they support it doing so. They could, for example, articulate how joining the ICC could offer Lebanon yet another multilateral venue to withstand pressure from external parties like the US and demonstrate to Lebanese civilians that the rule of law matters. More generally, ICC member states could do more to link bilateral and multilateral trade and economic negotiations with efforts to encourage states to join the court.
Third, states should offer additional financial backing to the ICC. Some say the court’s budget is too big for what it has accomplished. For 2026, it was about $210m – almost a fifth of the daily cost the US is paying to carry out the war in Iran. This is for a court that is seeking to hold perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide accountable in Ukraine, Palestine and Darfur.
Money speaks louder than words. Offering additional and flexible funding to the ICC would be a way to say: This is our court, and we will do whatever is necessary to ensure its operations have the resources they need.
Fourth, states must properly protect ICC staff sanctioned by the US. In August last year, numerous judges at the court were targeted with sanctions for doing nothing more than their part in impartially applying the law to hold perpetrators of atrocities accountable. As a result, they can’t use banks, book hotels or pay for a meal with their credit cards.
The European Union and Canada each have laws on their books that could block the impact of US sanctions on judges. Yet inexplicably, the EU has not invoked its Blocking Statute, and Canada has refused to invoke the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act, leaving their citizens working at the ICC to twist in the wind.
Additionally and inexplicably, neither the EU nor Canada has backed the legal suit by some of the judges to challenge the sanctions in US courts.
Trying to get the US under Trump to stop attacking the ICC is like trying to nail pudding to the wall: It’s not going to happen. But that does not justify the dithering of the court’s purported supporters.
The US assault against the court is calculated to silence ICC supporters and isolate them from the institution. Why? Because the US knows its siege on the court cannot alone ruin the institution. To succeed, it needs others to abandon the ICC.
Instead, states should take the opportunity offered by these unprecedented times to back the ICC in unprecedented ways. However imperfect it is, the court is the only permanent institution capable of holding the world’s worst perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide to account.
For its flaws, the court should be reformed, not destroyed to allow those very perpetrators off the hook. Maintaining support for the ICC in the face of Trump’s attacks is about more than protecting the court – it’s about drawing a line and pronouncing that no one, no matter how powerful, is above the law.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect WTX News’s editorial stance.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.









