LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Construction of 250-feet tall Arc de Trump to begin in Washington, D.C.

Get you up to speed: Construction of 250-feet-tall "Arc de Trump" set to begin in D.C.

Construction of a 250-feet-tall triumphal arch, known as the “Arc de Trump,” is scheduled to begin in Washington, D.C. Weijia Jiang has reported on the development.

Construction is scheduled to commence shortly, with further details about the timeline yet to be disclosed. There is currently no information available regarding the project’s budget or the contractor responsible for the build.

The construction of President Trump’s “Arc de Trump” has prompted mixed reactions, with local officials noting the potential for significant economic impact while expressing concerns over the project’s implications for the city’s landscape. Plans for a public consultation meeting later this month aim to address community feedback and outline any necessary adjustments to the construction proposal.

What remains unclear — It is not stated when the construction of the “Arc de Trump” will be completed.

Construction of 250-feet tall Arc de Trump to begin in Washington, D.C.

Construction of President Trump’s 250-feet-tall triumphal arch, nicknamed the “Arc de Trump,” is set to begin in Washington, D.C. Weijia Jiang has more.

Tensions rise over the Falklands following Trump’s comments on US support

Get you up to speed: Tensions spike over the Falklands after Trump’s comments – what could happen? | News World

Argentinian President Javier Milei reiterated his country’s claim to the Falkland Islands in a national address, stating that he would impose sanctions on any oil companies operating in the area. In response, the UK affirmed its “absolute and unshakeable” commitment to the islands, highlighting the self-determination of the Falkland Islanders.

The UK currently has nearly 1,500 military personnel stationed on the Falkland Islands, supported by RAF Mount Pleasant, which includes fighter jets and a naval patrol ship. There is no confirmed timeline for any potential sanctions from Argentina against oil companies operating in the area following President Milei’s statement.

Britain has reaffirmed its “absolute and unshakeable” commitment to the Falkland Islands following Argentinian President Javier Milei’s declaration of intentions to reclaim the territory. In reaction to Milei’s threats against oil companies, Defence Secretary Wes Streeting asserted that the Falklands remain British as determined by the islanders, and Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband promised to uphold their self-determination as the UK monitors the evolving situation.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how the UK plans to respond to Argentina’s renewed claims and potential sanctions on oil companies.

Tensions rise over the Falklands following Trump’s comments on US support

Tensions rise over the Falklands following Trump’s comments on US supportWashington‘s readiness to review it neutrality on his country’s dispute with Britain. Britain and Argentina fought a war over the islands in 1982. (Photo by Pablo PORCIUNCULA / AFP via Getty Images)” decoding=”sync”/>
The international territory is back in the news cycle(Picture: AFP)

Britain has said its commitment to the Falkland Islands is ‘absolute and unshakeable’ after Argentinian President Javier Milei said his country needed to take them back.

In a national address, Mr Milei reiterated the country’s claim to the islands and said he would impose sanctions on any oil companies operating in the area.

The renewed tensions over the British overseas territory came after President Donald Trump hinted the US would not help the UK in a future Falklands conflict.

Defence Secretary Wes Streeting wrote on social media: ‘Milei’s statement overnight tells us more about domestic politics in Argentina than it does about the Falkland Islands. The Falklands are British because Falkland Islanders choose to be British. Our commitment to the Falklands is absolute and unshakeable.’

A brief history of what’s happening

File photo dated 21/05/82 of helmets abandoned by Argentine armed forces who surrendered at Goose Green to British Falklands Task Force troops. Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has said the UK will "resolutely uphold" the self-determination of the Falkland Islands after Argentinian president Javier Milei said his country needed to take them back. Issue date: Friday September 4, 2026. PA Photo. In a national address, Mr Milei reiterated the country's claim on the islands and said he would introduce sanctions on any oil companies working in the area. The renewed tensions over the British overseas territory came after US president Donald Trump hinted the US would not help the UK in a future Falklands conflict. Photo credit should read: PA/PA Wire
Argentinian soldiers surrendered at Goose Green in 1982 (Picture: PA)

Sign up for all of the latest stories

In a 2013 referendum, the Falkland Islanders voted overwhelmingly to remain a British overseas territory, with 99.8% voting in favour and just three votes against.

Although the US is formally neutral, Washington provided support for Britain’s campaign to retake the islands after the Argentinian invasion in 1982.

It sparked the Falklands War, which saw 255 British service deaths in just over 70 bloody days. It also led to the deaths of 655 Argentinians and three Falkland Islanders.

What is Argentina saying?

In his speech, Mr Milei said: ‘I want to be quite clear with everybody. The Falklands are Argentinian. Historically and legally. There can be no argument. They are part of the Argentine territory.

‘The islanders on their usurped territory do not have a legitimate right to self-determination, and any argument on any such self-determination is invalid.’

He said the UK was facing ‘multiple crises on multiple fronts’ and said he would sign decrees to introduce sanctions against any companies working on oil production in the area.

He added: ‘If we do not act swiftly in a few months, they will have the material capacity to access the oil that lies underneath our sea. Something that has never happened before.’

Does the UK have the power to defend the Falklands today?

File photo dated 24/05/82 of an Argentinian bomb exploding on board the Royal Navy frigate HMS Antelope in San Carlos Bay, East Falkland, killing Staff Sergeant James Prescott, 37, of the Corps of Royal Engineers, the bomb disposal engineer who was trying to defuse it. Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has said the UK will "resolutely uphold" the self-determination of the Falkland Islands after Argentinian president Javier Milei said his country needed to take them back. Issue date: Friday September 4, 2026. PA Photo. In a national address, Mr Milei reiterated the country's claim on the islands and said he would introduce sanctions on any oil companies working in the area. The renewed tensions over the British overseas territory came after US president Donald Trump hinted the US would not help the UK in a future Falklands conflict. Photo credit should read: Martin Cleaver/PA Wire
During the 1982 conflict, an Argentinian bomb exploded on the HMS Antelope (Picture: PA)

Short answer – yes.

After the Falklands War ended, the UK built RAF Mount Pleasant south of the Falklands’ capital.

There are nearly 1,500 military personnel stationed on the Falklands at any given time, and the station has a detachment for small fighter jets, as well as a patrol ship.

Argentina, even with its mounting threats, doesn’t have the military power to take over the territory. Its flailing economy also poses issues if Milei were to choose military options.

Naval Technology notes that currently, the Royal Navy has no nuclear attack submarines at sea.

The UK would likely turn to the Royal Air Force if required to protect the overseas territory.

Why is Trump involved?

President Donald Trump addresses a dinner for donors who have contributed to build the new ballroom at the White House, Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/John McDonnell)
Yesterday, Trump said he wouldn’t back the UK in another fight over the Falklands (Picture: AP)

The US president on Thursday suggested he would not back the UK in a fight over the territory.

Asked in an interview if he would ‘come to the aid’ of the UK, the US president told GB News: ‘Well look, I was there when they had the first war.
That was a long time ago, and I watched it so carefully, and you comported yourselves very well.

‘You took it back pretty strongly, but it’s a long way away. That’s a big trip; it’s a long way.’

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

French minister expresses confidence in electorate rejecting Le Pen

French minister expresses confidence in electorate rejecting Le Pen

Poll Findings
An Elabe poll predicts Marine Le Pen will secure between 34% and 35.5% of first-round votes in the upcoming French presidential election.
Electoral Landscape
Marine Le Pen’s projected support of 34% to 35.5% highlights growing far-right sentiment, necessitating a united response from centrist parties to mitigate potential electoral shifts.
Haddad’s Confidence
“I’m quite confident that the French, like they’ve done so many times, will refuse extremism,” said Benjamin Haddad regarding the upcoming presidential election.

France ‘will reject extremism’ and Le Pen in presidential election, Haddad says

French minister expresses confidence in electorate rejecting Le Pen

French minister for European Affairs, Benjamin Haddad, told EU News he’s “quite confident” the French electorate will reject extremism, and won’t elect a far-right candidate to replace President Emmanuel Macron in next year’s election.

His comments come days after an Elabe poll for BFMTV/La Tribune Dimanche showed Le Pen dwarfing all other candidates; predicting her to win between 34% and 35.5% of first-round votes.

Le Pen, the president of the far-right National Rally party, was cleared to stand in July despite an appeals court upholding an embezzlement conviction against her.

“We still have a long way to go before the election, but I’m quite confident that the French, like they’ve done so many, many times, will refuse extremism,” Haddad said on EU News’ interview programme 12 Minutes With.

“The French people have repeatedly said no to extremism, to euroscepticism, and populism,” he said.

He said next spring’s 2027 election will be “a tough one, like every election,” but added that he “never trusts the polls,” arguing that they have been wrong in the past.

“When I personally started supporting Emmanuel Macron in 2016, he was far, far behind in the polls,” said Haddad, who belongs to the same political party as Macron, Renaissance (formerly La République En Marche!).

Ahead of the 2017 elections, Macron rose from third position in the polls after he declared his candidacy in November 2016, to briefly polling ahead of Le Pen weeks ahead of the elections.

He gained 24% of the vote in the first round in April 2017, then won the presidency in the second round with 66% of the vote, in contrast with Le Pen’s 34%. This margin narrowed significantly in the second round of the 2022 elections, when Macron beat Le Pen with 59% of the vote to her 41%.

French are ‘deeply European’

Haddad said the French are “deeply European” and will ultimately reject Le Pen.

“The French are proud of the role that their country is playing on the European stage,” he said.

“Marine Le Pen, for a long time, has been the candidate of ‘Frexit’,” he said, referring to the demand by some on the fringes of French politics, who called for France to leave the EU and the eurozone.

The prospect of France leaving the EU was a strong component in Le Pen’s 2012 and 2017 manifestos. At present, she still maintains a staunchly eurosceptic stance, pledging to cut back on Europe’s contributions to the bloc and calling for the scrapping of norms, but no longer explicitly advocates for a referendum on France’s membership of the EU.

“She’s been the candidate [standing for] leaving the eurozone. She was the candidate of the alliance with Vladimir Putin,” Haddad said.

“She’s trying to make people forget about all of this and sometimes even says that it never happened, even though we know her stance on the European Union for a long time.”

Despite his conviction that the French public will vote against Le Pen, Haddad warned politicians from other parties should approach the rise of the far-right and populism “with a lot of humility.”

“Our first responsibility is to continue to deliver on results. All the issues that we’re discussing, from migration and security, from competitiveness, prosperity, from defending the security of Europeans against foreign threats, we have to continue to deliver on this, Haddad explained.

He went on to say that continuing to “campaign, to meet the French, to listen to voters, and to respond” is also central in this mission.

Uniting around one candidate?

The linchpin to his proposal to beat the far-right will perhaps be the most challenging of all to attain, given the fragmented nature of the race with eight months to go until the first round of elections.

“We need to unify around a candidate, because right now we have a lot of talent in the centre, but we have a fragmented political offer,” Haddad said.

Around 30 figures have already expressed their ambition to run. Two of those considered likely candidates are Macron’s former prime ministers: centrist Gabriel Attal (Renaissance) and centre-right figure Édouard Philippe (Horizons), while conservative candidate Bruno Retailleau (Les Républicains) is one of the President’s former Ministers.

On the hard-left, Jean-Luc Mélenchon (La France Insoumise) is vying to be President, while other candidates running on the left include Marine Tondelier (the Greens) and MEP Raphaël Glucksmann (Place Publique).

“I think by the end of the year we will have one candidate that can rally the centre and the centre-right and then we will make a case.” Some candidates have suggested they would consider partaking in a primary.

Extremism ‘not the answer to uncertainties’

Still, Le Pen remains the front-runner in the polls. In 2024, her party won the European Parliamentary elections in France with more than twice the number of votes of Macron’s party, pushing the president to call a snap election at the time.

Haddad conceded that global uncertainties fuel populism’s popularity, pointing to the fact that many of the certainties people had before “are crumbling.”

“Trade is being weaponised as a tool of pressure. You see China’s subsidised overcapacities coming to our markets and destabilising our industries. Our traditional alliances are being questioned; there’s the war of Russian aggression on our continent,” he explained.

“When you have these uncertainties, and the pillars on which we built our European Union and our transatlantic alliance are questioned, this very often paves the way for radical answers,” Haddad added, noting that he doesn’t believe those answers are right,

“I don’t think that in a world where you have the pressure from China, from the US, the threat coming from Russia, we would be stronger going it alone. I don’t think we’d be stronger looking inwards.”

The first round of the French presidential election will take place on 18 April 2027, while the second will be held on 2 May 2027 if no candidate wins a majority of votes.

Two men rescued from Nepal hydropower tunnel nine days after floods

Media Lens: Two men rescued from Nepal hydropower tunnel nine days after floods

Story focus: Two men rescued from Nepal hydropower tunnel.

Primary entity: Nepal   |   Region: Nepal

Two men emerged alive from a hydropower plant tunnel in Nepal after being trapped for nine days following flooding. Rescuers continue to search for dozens of others still missing in the facility.

Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links


What has happened

On September 4, 2026, two men were rescued from a hydropower plant tunnel in Nepal nine days after they became trapped due to heavy flooding. The two individuals were located alive under challenging conditions, highlighting the extensive rescue efforts undertaken by local authorities and volunteers amid the disaster.

Rescue teams had been working tirelessly to reach the men, who were trapped in mud-filled tunnels, as they faced rising water levels. Their survival was a significant point of hope during a time when many others were reported missing or stranded in the flood-affected areas.

Status quo

A rescue operation in Nepal has successfully extracted two individuals who had been trapped for nine days within a hydropower plant’s tunnel, following severe flooding. The intervention was part of a larger ongoing effort to reach dozens of others believed to be stranded in the same location. This incident has garnered significant attention and mobilized rescue teams amid challenging conditions in the affected area.

Confirmed facts

  • Two men were rescued alive from a tunnel at a hydropower plant in Nepal after being trapped for nine days.
  • The rescue followed severe flooding that occurred in the area.
  • The two men were able to communicate with rescuers during the operation.
  • Rescue efforts are ongoing to reach additional individuals believed to be trapped in the tunnel.

Preconceptions

  • CNN prioritizes the human struggle and emotional aspects, emphasizing personal stories of survivors, while BBC focuses more on the operational and logistical efforts of rescuers, highlighting the larger scope of the rescue operation.
  • The New York Times places a strong emphasis on the timeline of the rescue and the conditions faced by the victims, whereas BBC reduces attention to individual experiences, opting instead for a broader overview of the incident and context.
  • CNN covers the rescue operation as a dramatic story of survival, while The New York Times links the event to discussions on infrastructure safety and disaster preparedness, showcasing different editorial angles.
  • BBC provides details on the number of individuals still trapped and the general context of floods in the region, which is less emphasized in CNN’s reporting, focusing more on the heroics of the rescue effort.

Elisions

  • Coverage on the Nepal hydropower tunnel rescue highlights CNN’s focus on first-person narratives and emotional appeals from families of the rescuers, while BBC emphasizes the logistical challenges faced by rescuers, leading to different public perceptions of the emergency response.
  • The New York Times reports on the timeline and specifics of the rescue operation in detail, noting key dates and events, while other outlets such as CNN provide a more general overview, lacking specific chronological elements.
  • BBC sources a diverse range of rescue team comments, which provides a broader perspective on the ongoing rescue efforts, whereas The New York Times primarily focuses on statements from official government sources, potentially leading to a narrower viewpoint.

One story, four angles


CNNTwo men pulled alive from Nepal hydropower plant tunnel nine days after floods

Publication: CNN | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: The headline leads readers to focus on the remarkable survival story of the two men and their miraculous rescue from the tunnel nine days after the floods.

Key differences:
– **Comparison**: CNN emphasizes the emotional narrative of survival (“two men pulled alive”) rather than detailing the rescue efforts, contrasting with BBC’s focus on ongoing rescue attempts.
– **Specific Example**: CNN’s choice of word “pulled alive” creates dramatic urgency, while BBC emphasizes “rescuers try to reach” the trapped individuals.
– **Placement**: CNN features this story as a standalone headline, signaling its importance and urgency, while BBC includes the news within broader coverage of the incident.

Bias: Selection: CNN highlights the survival as a miracle, possibly overshadowing broader issues surrounding the floods | Language: The use of “pulled alive” carries a dramatic tone that elicits strong emotional responses | Omission: Details about the flood’s aftermath and ongoing rescue operations are less emphasized.

Assessment: Readers are initially led to believe that this story showcases a miraculous survival against great odds.


BBCNepal rescuers try to reach dozens trapped in tunnel after two found alive

Publication: BBC | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: The article focuses on ongoing rescue efforts, prompting readers to consider the broader context of the disaster and the profound challenges involved.

Key differences:
– **Comparison**: BBC’s headline offers a more procedural view, highlighting the efforts to reach multiple trapped individuals, whereas CNN narrows in on the rescue of two.
– **Specific Example**: BBC’s phrasing “rescuers try to reach” positions the story in a more serious light, reflecting the urgency and the need for continued efforts.
– **Placement**: CNN presents the rescue story as a highlight, while BBC embeds it within a wider narrative of rescue operations.

Bias: Selection: BBC presents a broader overview of the situation, likely appealing to readers interested in wider implications | Language: More neutral language contrasts with CNN’s dramatic storytelling | Omission: Doesn’t emphasize the emotional aspect of survival as strongly as CNN.

Assessment: Readers likely perceive the situation as serious, with ongoing efforts reflecting the complexities of rescue operations.


The New York Times9 Days After Flood, Two Men Are Pulled Alive From Mud-Filled Tunnels in Nepal

Publication: The New York Times | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: The headline emphasizes the duration of entrapment alongside survival, framing it as a significant feat amidst adversity.

Key differences:
– **Comparison**: The New York Times stresses the duration of time the men were trapped, enhancing the narrative of survival, unlike CNN’s more immediate drama.
– **Specific Example**: The phrasing “pulled alive from mud-filled tunnels” conveys stark imagery, highlighting both the survival and the adverse conditions.
– **Placement**: The article aligns the timeline with the dramatic outcome, indicating precise timing in rescue efforts.

Bias: Selection: The New York Times accentuates the survival narrative, possibly lending a more editorial perspective on resilience | Language: Descriptive imagery enhances emotional resonance, possibly biasing readers toward a more heroic view | Omission: Less focus on the broader implications of the flooding itself beyond individual survival anecdotes.

Assessment: Readers likely believe they are witnessing a tale of survival that highlights human resilience in crisis.



In comparing the coverage of the Nepal rescue, CNN’s “Two men pulled alive from Nepal hydropower plant tunnel nine days after floods” emphasizes a sense of hope and resolution, showcasing the successful rescue operation as a triumph of human effort. Conversely, the BBC’s “Nepal rescuers try to reach dozens trapped in tunnel after two found alive” adopts a more escalatory framing, highlighting ongoing danger and uncertainty regarding the fate of others still trapped. While CNN focuses on the positive outcome, the BBC accentuates the tension and urgency of the situation. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.


CNN

Two men pulled alive from Nepal hydropower plant tunnel nine days after floods

BBC

Nepal rescuers try to reach dozens trapped in tunnel after two found alive

The New York Times

9 Days After Flood, Two Men Are Pulled Alive From Mud-Filled Tunnels in Nepal

CNN

‘Don’t panic’: How two men were rescued from a flood-stricken Nepali power plant

UN adopts new world map to accurately reflect Africa’s true size

Get you up to speed: UN votes to adopt new world map that reflects Africa’s true size

The United Nations voted on 4 September 2026 to adopt a new world map resolution, aimed at accurately representing countries’ sizes, in a decision led by African Union member states and the Bahamas. The resolution received overwhelming support, passing with a vote of 164-1 and six abstentions, as it seeks to address historical distortions caused by the widely-used Mercator map.

The resolution will not alter the use of the Mercator projection for maritime and aerial navigation, which remains suitable for those purposes. Togo plans to update its school geography materials by the end of the year and will advocate for the adoption of the Equal Earth projection among other governments and organisations.

The United Nations has officially adopted the “Correct the Map” resolution to promote the Equal Earth projection, reflecting a true representation of Africa’s size, with support from 164 member states. In response, Togo plans to update its school geography materials by the end of the year and will encourage other nations and organisations to adopt the new mapping standard.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how long it will take for Togo to implement the changes to its school geography materials.

UN adopts new world map to accurately reflect Africa’s true size

News|MapsUN votes to adopt new world map that reflects Africa’s true size

The widely-used Mercator map is often criticised for visually exaggerating and centralising Western nations.

Published On 4 Sep 20264 Sep 2026

The United Nations has voted to adopt a new world map that more accurately reflects countries’ true sizes, a resolution sponsored by African states to right a centuries-old wrong.

The “Correct the Map” resolution adopted by the UN general assembly on Friday aims to address a colonial-era injustice that has visually shrunk Africa for 450 years, shaping how the continent is perceived in media, education and policy around the world.

The resolution, put forward by African Union (AU) member states and the Bahamas, was backed by a vote of 164-1 with six abstentions.

Togo led the AU’s campaign to limit use of the widely-used Mercator map.

Developed in the 16th century by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator, the projection distorts the relative size of land masses by expanding those nearer the poles. For instance, it makes Greenland appear roughly the same size as Africa, even though Africa is about 14 times larger.

Some critics of the Mercator map believe it remains widely used because it visually exaggerates and centralises Western nations, perpetuating ideas of European superiority.

“A fair world begins with a fair map,” Togo’s Foreign Minister Robert Dussey told the Reuters news agency ahead of Friday’s vote.

The resolution promotes the Equal Earth projection, which more accurately portrays the size of the continents.

 

INTERACTIVE - Africa map equal earth projection mercator-1748347339

The resolution is not legally binding and it “in no way challenges the use of the Mercator projection for maritime and aerial navigation, for which it remains fully suited,” the Togolese ministry said in a statement.

The United States – the only country to vote against the resolution – said it promoted an “ideological agenda” and was a distraction from the “genuine problems of international peace, prosperity or good relations”.

Moky Makura, executive director of the advocacy organisation Africa No Filter that’s involved in “Correct the World” map campaign, hailed the vote, saying “now the real work begins”.

“We want to see accurate maps in schools, textbooks, newsrooms, businesses and on the digital platforms billions of people use every day,” Makura said in a statement.

“If we got something as basic as Africa’s size wrong for this long, what else about Africa have we simply accepted without questioning? Africa doesn’t need to be made bigger. It needs to be seen accurately,” she added.

‘Distortions eventually take root in perceptions’

Ahead of the vote, France, who co-sponsored the resolution, announced that it planned to abandon the Mercator map.

The foreign ministry “will abandon the Mercator projection in favour of map representations tailored to specific uses, more faithful to actual surface areas and in line with the recommendations of cartographers and scientists”, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said in a speech at the Sorbonne University in Paris.

“The United States, Russia and China take on a disproportionate visual prominence compared to Africa, Latin America or southeast Asia,” Barrot said, adding that “distortions eventually take root in perceptions” and that “the time has come to correct them.”

The Mercator map remains widely used in classrooms, but Togo hopes to change its school geography materials by the end of the year, Dussey told Reuters.

Togo will press other governments, schools, international organisations and technology companies to move away from the Mercator map in favour of the Equal Earth one, Dussey said.

Dussey linked the campaign to adopt the map to wider African efforts to confront colonial-era legacies, while saying it was not an attack on Europe or any other civilisation.

The Mercator map’s widespread use is a consequence of colonisation, he said.

“The world is changing. Africa also is changing.”

Five former B.C. Conservative MLAs establish new provincial party

Get you up to speed: Five former B.C. Conservative MLAs form new provincial party

Five former B.C. Conservative MLAs are establishing a new provincial party in British Columbia. They aim to provide voters with an alternative to the current governing NDP and the Conservatives.

The new party is in the process of establishing its organisational structure and aims to officially launch before the next provincial election. Former MLAs involved have not specified a timeline for their candidate selection or outreach to potential supporters.

Five former B.C. Conservative MLAs have announced the formation of a new provincial party aimed at providing voters with an alternative to the current NDP government and the existing Conservative party. The group is set to officially launch their platform in the coming weeks, seeking to engage with the public to outline their vision for the province.

What remains unclear — The specific policies and platform details of the new provincial party have not been disclosed.

Five former B.C. Conservative MLAs establish new provincial party

64e4688870f621c6b06daefa947e3e8ce5ab53d0d277a5718b64e3da53b257b5
Five former B.C. Conservative MLAs are forming a new provincial party they say will offer voters an alternative to both the governing NDP and the Conservatives.

LIVE German 2025 Election