- Prince Harry ordered to pay £9.54 million in legal costs to publishers
- US judge overturns Trump’s immigrant visa ban affecting 75 nations
- Whale sanctuary project secures 20-year lease in Nova Scotia amid opposition
- Pentagon seeks to dismiss publisher and editor of Stars and Stripes
- Retired Russian general linked to Defence Ministry found shot dead in Moscow
- Giorgia Meloni criticises Donald Trump over strained US-Italy relations
- Russian drone strikes kill at least 15 people in Ukrainian shopping mall
- US Supreme Court allows Trump to continue White House ballroom project for now
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Prince Harry ordered to pay £9.54 million in legal costs to publishers
Prince Harry ordered to pay £9.54 million in legal costs to publishers
Prince Harry and six other claimants have been ordered to pay £9.54 million as an advance on legal costs following their defeat against Associated Newspapers.
Harry and the other claimants are required to pay £9.54 million as an advance on legal costs, highlighting the significant financial implications stemming from their failed lawsuit against Associated Newspapers.
“The ruling serves as a devastating rebuke to those challenging our credibility and journalistic integrity,” stated a representative for Associated Newspapers.
Harry returns to UK as hefty Daily Mail legal bill lands

By EU News
Published on •Updated
Prince Harry’s return to the United Kingdom comes at a particularly sensitive time. As the Duke of Sussex prepares to spend more time in the country with his wife Meghan Markle and their children Archie and Lilibet, a serious consequence of his legal battle against the Daily Mail’s publishing group has arrived from the High Court in London: Harry and the other six claimants must pay a total of £9.54 million, around €11 million, as an initial payment towards the publisher’s legal costs.
The sum is not linked to the Sussexes’ move to the United Kingdom, but to their defeat in the case against Associated Newspapers, the group that publishes the Daily Mail, the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline. Harry, Elton John, David Furnish, Liz Hurley and the other key figures in the proceedings had accused the publisher of having violated their privacy over many years through alleged unlawful methods used to obtain information about their private lives.
The case, however, ended in defeat for the seven claimants. Now the bill is arriving, for the moment only a partial one.
Harry and the others ordered to pay £9.5 million
Mr Justice Matthew Nicklin has ruled that the seven must pay £9.54 million as an advance on the legal costs incurred by Associated Newspapers. The amount works out at around £1.36 million per claimant, although the actual allocation of the sum will depend on subsequent agreements and decisions.
The publishing group had asked for much more: a total of £34.5 million. A demand the judge described as excessive. Within three months Associated Newspapers must submit to the Court a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred, and it will then be decided how much must actually be reimbursed.
The final bill could therefore be significantly higher than the £9.54 million already requested.
The claimants also have insurance cover of up to about £16.2 million. If the ultimate costs were to exceed that threshold, however, any excess could end up being borne by those involved.
Harry and the others have until 2 October to lodge any appeal against the decision, although permission to proceed is not automatic.
The battle against the tabloid press
For Harry, the affair marks a new chapter in his long-running war with the British media. In recent years the prince has brought several legal actions against the tabloids, winning some of them.
In this case, however, the judge dismissed the allegations levelled at the Daily Mail group. The publisher has welcomed the verdict as a powerful vindication of its position, arguing that the ruling amounts to a devastating rebuke to the attempt to challenge the newspaper and the reputation of its journalists and executives.
The decision comes just as Harry is beginning to look towards the United Kingdom with different prospects compared with the years he has spent in California.
Harry and Meghan return to the United Kingdom
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have decided to spend more time in the United Kingdom and to send their children Archie and Lilibet to a British school. The couple will nonetheless retain their base in the United States, at their home in Montecito.
Their return does not, however, mean a comeback to the Royal Family as working members. Harry and Meghan gave up their official duties in 2020 and relations with the family remain marked by the tensions of recent years.
Relations with Prince William remain particularly sensitive. The prospect of the younger brother returning to live in the United Kingdom on a more permanent basis would bring Harry much closer to the royal family again, after years of distance and public statements that have fuelled tensions.
The security issue
And then there is another question, this time directly linked to the return to the United Kingdom: security.
After stepping back from official duties, Harry lost the automatic right to state-funded protection and launched a long legal battle to secure an appropriate level of security once again.
If he does return to the country on a more settled basis, the situation could be reassessed by the authorities in light of the new circumstances and the level of risk. According to some estimates reported in the British press, a security detail could cost up to £5 million, around €5.8 million, inevitably fuelling debate about any use of public money.
It is therefore a return full of uncertainties for the Sussexes: the case against the Daily Mail is presenting the bill on the financial front, while the move to Britain is reopening the security file and, in the background, that of relations with the royal family.
US judge overturns Trump’s immigrant visa ban affecting 75 nations
Get you up to speed: US judge strikes down Trump immigrant visa ban affecting 75 countries
A United States judge in Manhattan ruled against the Trump administration’s policy that suspended immigrant visas for applicants from 75 countries, determining the policy was “patently unlawful.” The ruling, issued by Judge Jeannette Vargas in the Southern District of New York, came in a lawsuit filed by immigrant rights groups and affected visa applicants.
The ruling was issued following a lawsuit from immigrant rights groups, including Catholic Legal Immigration Network and African Communities Together, along with individual visa applicants. The State Department’s suspension, which began in January 2026, impacted applicants from numerous countries across Latin America, the Balkans, South Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and the Caribbean.
Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled that the suspension of immigrant visas by the State Department was “patently unlawful” and exceeded Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s authority, following a lawsuit from immigrant rights groups. The Department of State has not yet issued a response to the ruling, leaving questions about its next steps in light of the policy’s impact on applicants from 75 countries.
What remains unclear — The State Department has not yet indicated how it will respond to the judge’s ruling.
US judge overturns Trump’s immigrant visa ban affecting 75 nations
News|MigrationUS judge strikes down Trump immigrant visa ban affecting 75 countries
A federal judge in Manhattan ruled against the State Department’s suspension of immigrant visas.
Published On 22 Aug 202622 Aug 2026
A United States judge has struck down a policy introduced by the administration of President Donald Trump suspending the issuance of immigrant visas to applicants from 75 countries, saying the policy exceeded Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s statutory authority.
Judge Jeannette Vargas of Manhattan said in her ruling on Friday in the Southern District of New York that the policy was “patently unlawful” and conflicted with federal immigration law, which explicitly stripped the secretary of state of authority over consular officers’ adjudication of immigrant visas.
“The Policy, which categorically prohibits the issuance of immigrant visas based upon the nationality of the applicant, represents a direct abrogation of this statutory scheme,” she wrote.
Vargas, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by immigrant rights groups Catholic Legal Immigration Network and African Communities Together, along with applicants for immigrant visas and US citizens sponsoring family members from the designated countries.
The suspension, which took effect in January of this year, affected applicants from Latin American countries including Brazil, Colombia and Uruguay; Balkan nations such as Bosnia and Albania; South Asian countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh; and many nations in Africa, the Middle East and the Caribbean.
The Department of State said applicants from those countries were “at a high risk for becoming a public charge and recourse to local, state and federal government resources in the United States”.
President Donald Trump has pursued an aggressive immigration crackdown during his presidency that he argues is aimed at improving domestic security. According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, the freeze was one of several restrictions the administration has imposed in rapid succession, following a broader travel ban covering 39 countries that took effect January 1, and a pause on diversity visa issuance in late December.
Rights groups have suggested that the crackdown violates free speech and due process rights, particularly for minorities, who have raised concerns about racial profiling.
The State Department has not yet commented on the ruling.
Whale sanctuary project secures 20-year lease in Nova Scotia amid opposition
Get you up to speed: Whale sanctuary project secures 20-year Nova Scotia lease despite ongoing opposition
An Arizona-based organisation, the Whale Sanctuary Project, has signed a 20-year lease for Crown land and coastal waters on Nova Scotia’s Eastern Shore to create a seaside refuge for retired whales. The project has faced criticism from some residents and animal-rights advocates.
The Whale Sanctuary Project has secured a 20-year lease for Crown land and coastal waters, allowing the initiative to advance following considerable opposition. Currently, specific details regarding the timeline for the construction and opening of the sanctuary have not been disclosed.
The Whale Sanctuary Project has secured a 20-year lease for Crown land and coastal waters in Nova Scotia, which is a significant advancement despite opposition from certain residents and animal-rights groups. The project aims to establish a refuge for whales retired from marine parks, with the next steps including community consultations and further regulatory approvals before construction can begin.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how the organization will address the concerns raised by critics regarding the refuge.
Whale sanctuary project secures 20-year lease in Nova Scotia amid opposition

An Arizona-based organization that plans to create a seaside refuge for whales retired from marine parks has signed a 20-year lease for Crown land and coastal waters on Nova Scotia’s Eastern Shore, marking a major milestone for a project that has also faced criticism from some residents and animal-rights advocates. The Whale Sanctuary Project announced…
Pentagon seeks to dismiss publisher and editor of Stars and Stripes
Get you up to speed: Pentagon moves to fire publisher and editor of Stars and Stripes
The Pentagon has initiated the termination of Publisher Max Lederer, Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin, and reporter Lara Korte of Stars and Stripes, citing insubordination linked to interviews given for a WTX US News segment. The terminations were communicated on Friday, allowing the affected individuals five days to appeal their dismissals.
Publisher Max Lederer and Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin have five days to appeal their dismissals, which were triggered by allegations of insubordination linked to statements made during a WTX interview. Stars and Stripes, which has a $29 million annual budget with approximately half funded by taxpayers, aims to maintain editorial independence while facing declining readership figures.
The Pentagon has issued separation notices to Publisher Max Lederer and Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin, citing insubordination related to interviews they conducted, which challenged the news outlet’s editorial independence. In a statement to WTX US News, Slavin confirmed he would appeal the dismissal and reaffirmed his commitment to maintaining the outlet’s independence, while Stars and Stripes’ newly appointed military deputy, Capt. William Urban, outlined a future focus on editorial quality and revenue generation.
What remains unclear — The Pentagon has not disclosed the specific details of the alleged insubordination that led to the firings of Slavin, Lederer, and Korte.
Pentagon seeks to dismiss publisher and editor of Stars and Stripes
Washington — The Pentagon on Friday moved to fire the publisher and the editor in chief of Stars and Stripes, the U.S. military news outlet partly funded by American taxpayers, as well as a reporter who covers the Middle East, according to people familiar with the matter.
The separation notices, delivered Friday, gave Publisher Max Lederer and Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin five days to appeal their dismissals. Reporter Lara Korte also said she received notice that she was being fired.
The cause cited was insubordination. Slavin and Korte said the alleged insubordination was related to interviews they gave to WTX US News for a piece on “WTX Sunday Morning” that aired in July.
In a statement to WTX US News, Slavin said he will respond to the firing notice through the required process.
“According to the notice, I am being fired for stating in a WTX interview that censorship of news for service members would constitute a red line. The Pentagon’s public affairs office has charged me with insubordination,” Slavin said. “I stand by the principle that Stars and Stripes must remain editorially independent, as required by law and by the department’s own policies.”
Slavin spoke publicly about disagreements with Pentagon leaders in the “Sunday Morning” story. In that piece, Slavin was asked if he had any red lines he would not cross. He replied, “‘Don’t run a perfectly accurate story, run this instead. Here it is, written by the Pentagon.’ That would be a red line.”
In a statement, Korte called the firings “a shame for the institution and service members, who swore to defend the Constitution and deserve the right to a free and independent press.”
“I’m proud of the work my colleagues and I do at Stars and Stripes, especially the last six months covering the protracted conflict in Iran. Military families and service members have trusted us to share their experience with the world and I don’t take that lightly,” she said.
Korte was also featured in the July “Sunday Morning” story, in which she said: “I’m working for Stars and Stripes. Not for the Pentagon, not for any administration, not for any policymaker. I’m here to cover the military community.”
A Defense Department spokesman declined to comment when contacted on Friday afternoon by WTX US News, which first reported the firings of Slavin and Lederer.
When asked Friday by WTX US News chief White House correspondent Nancy Cordes about the reported firings at Stars and Stripes, White House adviser Stephen Miller said he’s confident that “if anybody was fired, it was for just cause.”
Shortly after the firings were reported, Stars and Stripes published an open letter by Capt. William Urban, who said he had been tapped two weeks ago to help lead the outlet in a new role as military deputy to the publisher. The document included a memo of recommendations that Urban sent to Lederer on Aug. 17. Urban said he did not receive a response.
“As I settle into the job, I am not going to dwell on the past,” Urban said in his open letter. “In the spirit of looking to the future and striving together for a better Stripes, I believe we should be focused on three priorities.”
Those priorities, he wrote, are to produce “the highest quality of editorially independent reporting,” to “leverage our great reporting and our increased focus on digital content to increase revenue through advertising” and to “embrace a culture of change as we extensively modernize our operations.”
Lederer had served as the outlet’s publisher for 19 years and told colleagues this week that he would retire on Sept. 30, citing fundamental differences with the Trump administration.
WTX US News reported on Wednesday that Pentagon officials had discussed dismissing Lederer before his scheduled retirement.
In a note to staff earlier this week that was obtained by WTX US News, Lederer wrote: “It has become clear that my philosophy of leadership, and my understanding of the value and mission of Stars and Stripes, differ in fundamental ways from the direction the leadership of the Department of Defense has for the organization.”
But he added he would “do everything I can to make sure the transition is smooth for each of you” before his retirement.
Stars and Stripes has been a source of critical information for members of the military and their families for decades, and has prided itself on editorial independence.
Recently, Stars and Stripes, along with the Military Times, reported on challenging conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, writing that family members of service members aboard the aircraft carrier were concerned about their loved ones’ mental health and risk of self-harm. Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Trump downplayed or denied those reports, but the ship left the Middle East this week to begin the journey home to the U.S. after a nine-month deployment.
Roughly half of Stars and Stripes’ $29 million annual budget comes from taxpayers, a person familiar with the newspaper’s operations said. Readership has declined since its peaks during the Vietnam War, the Cold War and World War II, according to two U.S. officials, but an average of 1.4 million people see Stars and Stripes each day. Print editions overseas also reach service members in remote locations where internet access is spotty and unreliable.
Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell has talked about “bringing Stars and Stripes into the 21st century” and efforts to “refocus its content away from woke distractions that syphon morale, and adapt it to serve a new generation of service members.”
Arden Farhi
contributed to this report.
Retired Russian general linked to Defence Ministry found shot dead in Moscow
Get you up to speed: Mystery as retired spy general with links to Russia’s Defence Ministry found shot dead | News World
Major-General Igor Laptev, an 83-year-old retired Russian spy general, was found dead with a gunshot wound to the head in his apartment on Verkhnyaya Krasnoselskaya Street in Moscow on August 20. The Investigative Committee has confirmed the incident, stating that a pistol was found near his body, but has not publicly commented on the circumstances of his death.
Authorities found Major-General Igor Laptev’s body in his apartment on August 20, with a pistol located nearby. The Investigative Committee has yet to release any official statements regarding the circumstances of his death or the ongoing investigation.
Russia’s Investigative Committee has not yet commented on the death of Major-General Igor Laptev, who was reportedly involved in a legal dispute with the Defence Ministry at the time of his death. The investigation into the incident is ongoing, and authorities have confirmed a pistol was found near his body, further complicating the circumstances surrounding his demise.
What remains unclear — It is not known whether Major-General Igor Laptev left a note behind or what motivated his alleged suicide.
Retired Russian general linked to Defence Ministry found shot dead in Moscow

Major-General Igor Laptev’s body was found at his apartment
A retired Russian spy general who ran a company supplying secure communications to Vladimir Putin’s Defence and Interior ministries has been found dead in Moscow.
Major-General Igor Laptev’s body was discovered in his study at his apartment on Verkhnyaya Krasnoselskaya Street on August 20.
The 83-year-old had a gunshot wound to the head, according to reports in Russia.
As reported by pro-Kremlin newspaper Moskovsky Komsomolets, it was claimed that the decorated former KGB and FSB officer had taken his own life.
A possible motive has not been disclosed, nor is it clear whether a note was left.
Details are also scarce regarding the weapon and its owner, but law enforcement did confirm the incident to state media, adding that a pistol was found near his body.
Sign up for all of the latest stories

He ran a company supplying secure communications to Vladimir Putin’s Defence and Interior ministries (Picture: Kristina Solovyova/Pool Sputnik)
He was found by relatives.
Russia’s Investigative Committee has not publicly commented on the death or the circumstances.
Laptev died eight days before his 84th birthday but still actively worked in a company with high-level security clearance.
He had held sensitive positions in Russia’s intelligence services, defence industry, tax police, and government before becoming chairman of the Informtekhnika group, which develops protected communications and information systems used for transmitting state secrets.
Laptev joined the Soviet KGB in 1971 and later took part in combat operations during the Soviet war in Afghanistan.
During his service in the KGB and its Russian successor, the FSB, Laptev specialised in ‘information security’.
He later worked for the powerful Federal Tax Police before serving as Russia’s deputy minister for taxes and levies during Boris Yeltsin’s presidency in the late 1990s.

Several Russian intelligence figures have been found dead since Putin launched his invasion (Picture: Getty Images)
At the time of his death, his company was reportedly involved in a legal dispute with the Defence Ministry over alleged delays to military communications contracts, including a £62,600 claim filed in May 2026.
Among his accolades were 12 medals, plus both the Soviet Order of the Badge of Honour and Russia’s Order of Honour.
His death joins a succession of senior Russian military and intelligence figures reported to have taken their own lives since Putin launched his full-scale invasion.
In June 2022, the body of retired SVR foreign intelligence Major-General Lev Sotskov, 90, was found in his apartment beside a pistol he had reportedly received as an award.
A month later, retired FSB Major-General Yevgeny Lobachev, 76, was found dead on the landing of his Moscow apartment building, with Russian law-enforcement sources attributing his death to suicide.
Weeks after being dismissed from his post by Putin, former senior Interior Ministry anti-extremism official Major-General Vladimir Makarov, 72, died from a gunshot wound at his home in February 2023.
Former transport minister Roman Starovoit, 53, was also found shot dead in July 2025, hours after Putin sacked him.
Russian investigators said suicide was the principal explanation being examined, but there were dark claims he had been ‘tortured’ before being ‘murdered’.
As of January 2026, Russia has lost at least 19 generals, reports claim.
There is a long list of additional businesspeople who have died suspiciously since the build-up to Putin’s war.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Giorgia Meloni criticises Donald Trump over strained US-Italy relations
Giorgia Meloni criticises Donald Trump over strained US-Italy relations
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni stated there has been no contact with Donald Trump for several weeks amid ongoing tensions between her government and the Washington administration.
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s emphasis on Western unity underscores the critical nature of Italy’s positioning within NATO amid ongoing tensions with the United States administration.
“I do not like the idea of a subservient Italy that sees itself as inferior to others,” stated Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, emphasising her commitment to national pride.
Giorgia Meloni says ‘I thought it would be easier with Trump’ New York Times reports

Published on
“It is clear that, with Donald Trump, I thought things would be easier, given our convergence on immigration and woke culture. But things turned out differently.”, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told to the New York Times, setting out her view of the difficult relations that have developed over time between her government and the Washington administration.
In July Trump’s post about Meloni: ‘Needs a restraining order’
The tensions between the two governments peaked last July, ahead of the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, when the US head of state posted on his social network Truth an image showing him next to Meloni, accompanied by the caption: “Needs a restraining order”. In other words, a precautionary measure like those imposed on stalkers – a way of signalling his intention to keep the prime minister more at arm’s length.
In the interview, she said that there had been no contact with Trump for several weeks. When asked whether a meeting was planned after the summer break, the Brothers of Italy leader gave an evasive answer, “We will see”, she then added, “I continue to believe that Western unity is very important.” While making it clear that she does not “decide Italy’s strategy on the basis” of her “personal relationships.”
More broadly, Meloni reiterated a position she has voiced before, “I do not like” she said “the idea of a subservient Italy that sees itself as inferior to others.” She thus asserted her determination to carry out “the greatest possible revolution in this nation: a revolution of pride”.
‘I want to carry out the greatest possible revolution in Italy: a revolution of pride’
The prime minister then spoke about her decision to be referred to as “presidente” in the masculine, once again confirming her belief that the feminist campaign for inclusive language is “wrong: what matters to me is whether I am free to become president of the Council of Ministers. That is equality, not being called ‘la presidente’.”
She also returned to the words she spoke at a rally that went around the world, “I am a woman, I am a mother, I am Italian, I am Christian”. Meloni told the New York Times that she is convinced those words “struck a chord that millions of people felt – the sense of being under threat in their most authentic and fundamental identity”.
The article devoted by the US newspaper to the Italian leader then traces her origins in the Garbatella district of Rome, recounts her family relationships and her political career, which has its roots in the Youth Front, an organisation of what was then the Italian Social Movement, a party inspired by neo-fascism.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.










