- Lebanon becomes unsafe for former Syrian regime officials amid extradition risks
- Trump suspends tariffs on Canada, cites pending trade agreement
- Florida Senate race between Ashley Moody and Angie Nixon confirmed after primary victories
- Sisters, aged 14 and 15, go missing days apart in northern Germany
- French film producer Nicolas Altmayer and partner Mathilde Favier die in crash
- Trump Administration Moves to Open Millions of Acres for Logging in Forests
- Trump calls for reduction of US-South Korea military drills
- Trump administration proposes repeal of rule protecting national forest areas
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Lebanon becomes unsafe for former Syrian regime officials amid extradition risks
Get you up to speed: Lebanon no longer a safe haven for former Syrian regime officials
Adel Issa, a former major general in Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian Army, was arrested in Beirut, Lebanon, after allegedly being tipped off by Syrian embassy staff while he sought to complete paperwork. Lebanese authorities have confirmed that Issa will be extradited to Syria to face trial for alleged crimes committed during his military service.
The Lebanese judiciary has not yet confirmed the legal basis for the extradition of additional Syrian regime officials despite ongoing requests from Syrian authorities. Consequently, uncertainty remains regarding the fate of other high-ranking defectors, including Jamil al-Hassan, who is reportedly residing in Lebanon.
The Syrian government is actively seeking the extradition of former regime officials in Lebanon for war crimes, as confirmed by judge Mustafa al-Qassem, who stated, “We are seeking to boost the international judicial cooperation to pursue members of the former regime.” Following the arrest of Adel Issa, a top Lebanese prosecutor announced plans for Issa’s extradition to Syria, raising concerns over the treatment of other former officials who remain in Lebanon amidst changing diplomatic dynamics.
What remains unclear — The exact number of former Syrian regime officials currently in Lebanon and their potential extradition status remains unspecified.
Lebanon becomes unsafe for former Syrian regime officials amid extradition risks
Features|Syria’s WarLebanon no longer a safe haven for former Syrian regime officials
Figures connected to the former Syrian regime are still in Lebanon but risk being returned.
Published On 19 Aug 202619 Aug 2026
Beirut, Lebanon – Not long after the fall of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, the new government was keen to hunt down members of the former regime.
Al-Assad and his brother fled the country hours before the capital Damascus fell to the advancing armed opposition, leaving many top officials and military commanders to fend for themselves.
Many of them reportedly fled and crossed to neighbouring Lebanon where some top officials were spotted openly in capital, Beirut.
Now the Syrian government is trying to get them extradited for war crimes committed during the uprising, which began in 2011.
“We are seeking to boost the international judicial cooperation to pursue members of the former regime and extradited to Syria to complete judicial procedures and process,” judge Mustafa al-Qassem, an aide to the Syrian justice minister, said in an interview with state television.
Former officials felt they were safe in Lebanon due to their close connections with Hezbollah or their network with figures in Lebanon’s military. Some had built connections in Lebanon over the years, including during Syria’s occupation of Lebanon, which ended in 2005.
But that’s no longer the case.
Adel Issa, a former major general in al-Assad’s Syrian Army, was arrested recently in Lebanon after staff at the Syrian embassy reportedly tipped off authorities after he came in to do paperwork. A top Lebanese prosecutor announced on Tuesday that Issa would be extradited to Syria to face trial due to alleged crimes he committed during his military service.
But there are other former al-Assad regime officials who are in Lebanon and whom Syrian authorities also want returned to face justice.
Last week, al-Assad, his brother Maher and his cousin Atef Najib were all sentenced to death by a Damascus court. Bashar and Maher al-Assad were sentenced in absentia because they are in exile in Moscow, where they fled after the regime fell.
Their presence in Russia likely protects them from extradition. But the case brings to attention important issues about remaining regime figures in Lebanon and their potential extradition to Syria.
Regime officials in Lebanon
On December 8, 2024, the five-decade reign of the al-Assad regime ended when Bashar left Damascus for Moscow. As rebels entered Damascus, al-Assad fled without telling many of his top officials who then had to sort out their own escapes.
Sources with knowledge of the whereabouts of former regime members said the top figures – such as the al-Assads or the former head of the National Security Bureau Ali Mamlouk – are in Moscow or the United Arab Emirates.
However, Jamil al-Hassan, the former head of the Air Force Intelligence Directorate, is thought to be in Lebanon. Last year, media reports suggested that Syria and France have called on Lebanon to arrest and extradite al-Hassan.
Aside from him, Bassam al-Hassan, a former Republican Guard commander who was in al-Assad’s inner circle, was tracked down to a Beirut apartment by a US broadcaster last year. He had been responsible for procuring weapons and liaising with Syria’s chemical weapons programme, which the regime used against its own people.
Hezbollah’s role
Syrian and European sources intimately familiar with the details said most former regime officials still in Lebanon are now in Tripoli’s Jabal Mohsen neighbourhood or in parts of the northern region of Akkar, which borders Syria. Estimates on the number of former regime officials in Lebanon are imprecise, experts said, because many have either moved to third countries, sometimes with false passports, or have been smuggled back into Syria.
One source familiar with the issue, speaking on background because he wasn’t authorised to share information publicly, said that in the early days after the fall of the regime, former government figures set up training camps in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley. However, the source said, the camps have since been shut down by Hezbollah and the Lebanese army.
On August 4, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem said his party was open to a meeting with Syria’s leadership. The group fought side by side with the al-Assad regime in Syria’s war and is, therefore, viewed negatively by many Syrians. But Hezbollah has said it has no desire for bad relations with Syria’s new government.
“Russia shelters the family and its fortunes while so far declining to fund a restoration [of the al-Assad regime], and Hezbollah, under disarmament pressure, needs calm with Damascus more than it needs a [battle on the] Syrian front,” Nanar Hawach, the International Crisis Group’s senior analyst on Syria, told WTX News.
Syria has been under pressure from the United States to intervene in Lebanon against Hezbollah although experts believe Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and his government are aware that such a move could lead to widespread regional unrest and undermine the domestic authority they are working to establish, including from figures still in Lebanon.
Extradition controversy
For years, Syria had a paternal relationship and view towards neighbouring Lebanon. The Syrian military entered Lebanon in 1976 when Bashar’s father, Hafez al-Assad, was in power and occupied large swaths of the country until 2005 when a popular uprising pushed Bashar al-Assad to withdraw his troops.
The younger al-Assad and Syria still exerted their influence in Lebanon via local allies, including Hezbollah, until the regime’s demise in 2024. Since then, Syria’s new government under al-Sharaa has indicated a willingness to have a more balanced and egalitarian relationship with Beirut.
To date, no Syrian regime figures accused of committing atrocities have been returned from Lebanon. That’s why, with extradition approved, Issa’s case could be so groundbreaking. While they have not yet faced trial, many former regime officials are either under foreign sanctions and/or worked in key regime roles that contributed to severe crimes against the Syrian people.
Earlier this year, Syrian authorities asked Lebanese security forces to hand over more than 200 senior officers who fled to Lebanon after the fall of Bashar al-Assad, according to a Reuters agency investigation that showed how the neighbouring country was a hub for insurgent plotting.
Lebanon’s parliament has passed a law to abolish capital punishment, making it the first country in the Middle East to do so. That has contributed to the controversy over the extradition process with Syria, which does apply the death penalty.
Wadih al-Asmar, cofounder and president of the Lebanese Centre for Human Rights, said a number of the Syrian officials in Lebanon would have committed crimes during the occupation period and, therefore, the Lebanese judiciary “has a duty and obligation” to prosecute some of these figures.
Al-Asmar said his organisation has received asylum requests from Syrians afraid to return to their country but none had been military figures connected to the former regime.
But other ex-regime officials, particularly those in Europe, could have those connections. And the landmark trial in Damascus last week that sentenced the al-Assad brothers and their cousin to death could be a concern for European and other states when extraditing wanted figures to Syria.
Experts said Beirut’s desire to have a positive relationship with Damascus will likely supersede human rights concerns related to the death penalty for former regime figures. Still, al-Asmar said: “Lebanon cannot, without violating international law and its own law, send back any person to a country where he can face the death penalty.”
He added: “It’s a very complicated situation, and I believe the only way out for the Lebanese government and the Syrian government with respect to the state of law is for Syria to abolish the death penalty.”
Trump suspends tariffs on Canada, cites pending trade agreement
Get you up to speed: Trump pauses tariffs on Canada, cites pending trade deal
The President announced on social media that duties were delayed due to an agreement being reached between Canada and the United States. This development is pending the finalisation of documents.
The president indicated that the implementation of the duties has been postponed pending the finalisation of documentation. No specific timeline for the final agreement between Canada and the U.S.A. has been provided.
The president announced on social media that tariffs would be delayed, stating it is “based on the fact that Canada and the U.S.A., subject to the finalization of documents, have a DEAL!” Further details on the agreement are expected to be released following the completion of all necessary documentation.
What remains unclear — The specifics of the deal between Canada and the U.S.A. have not been disclosed.
Trump suspends tariffs on Canada, cites pending trade agreement

The president says on social media that the duties were delayed “based on the fact that Canada and the U.S.A., subject to the finalization of documents, have a DEAL!”
Florida Senate race between Ashley Moody and Angie Nixon confirmed after primary victories
Get you up to speed: Florida Senate race set between Ashley Moody and Angie Nixon after projected primary wins
GOP Sen. Ashley Moody and Democratic state Rep. Angie Nixon won their respective primaries for U.S. Senate in Florida, as projected by The Associated Press. Moody secured the GOP nomination while Nixon triumphed over Alex Vindman, setting the stage for their November election matchup.
Sen. Ashley Moody’s term in the Senate ends in early 2029, and she was appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis to fill the position after replacing Marco Rubio. Democratic state Rep. Angie Nixon’s campaign focused on progressive policies and she has represented parts of Jacksonville since 2020.
GOP Senator Ashley Moody secured her nomination for the U.S. Senate, receiving an endorsement from former President Trump ahead of the general election. In contrast, Democrat Angie Nixon’s win over Alex Vindman underscores a trend of insurgent candidates in primary races, as the upcoming election is seen as crucial for both parties in the context of Florida’s shifting political landscape.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how Democrats plan to overcome the challenges presented by Florida’s increasingly red political landscape.
Florida Senate race between Ashley Moody and Angie Nixon confirmed after primary victories
Washington — GOP Sen. Ashley Moody and Democratic state Rep. Angie Nixon will face off in November after winning their primaries for U.S. Senate on Tuesday night, The Associated Press projects.
Moody defeated a handful of lesser-known Republicans to secure the GOP nomination Tuesday as she fights to hold onto the seat she was appointed to fill last year. But Democrats are eyeing a long-shot pickup opportunity in the Sunshine State in their effort to flip control of the Senate.
Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, defeated Alex Vindman, a National Security Council whistleblower who testified in President Trump’s first impeachment trial, in Tuesday’s primary. The win marks the latest example of an insurgent Democrat pulling off a victory in the primary over a more moderate opponent with a significant cash advantage. It’s a dynamic that has defined the midterm elections so far, cropping up in races from New York City to Colorado to Michigan.
“Rep. Nixon ran a strong campaign. I will be standing by her side in the fight against Ashley Moody. I hope you’ll join me,” Vindman said in a statement Tuesday night.
In the primary, Nixon, 42, leaned on her deep roots in the state and ran on progressive policies like Medicare for All, free childcare, paid family and sick leave and a national rent freeze, while highlighting her background as a champion for working and middle-class Floridians. She’s represented portions of the Jacksonville area in the Florida statehouse since 2020.
Meanwhile, a handful of Republicans, including Army veteran Chris Gleason, physician Neelam Perry and minister Ernie Rivera, had been vying for the GOP nomination. But Moody, a former Florida attorney general, secured the nomination, billing herself as a fifth-generation Floridian with a track record of backing law enforcement and fighting for safer communities.
The Florida Republican, 51, was appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis to replace Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Congress’ upper chamber. Now, she’s aiming to win the special election to serve out the remainder of his term, which ends in early 2029.
Moody served as Florida’s attorney general from 2019 until her appointment to the Senate in January 2025. Before that, she worked as a commercial litigator and federal prosecutor, and became Florida’s youngest circuit court judge in 2007. In the Senate, she’s been a reliable supporter of Mr. Trump’s agenda, and received his endorsement last month. Ahead of the primary, Mr. Trump said she’s “doing a tremendous job representing the incredible people of Florida.”
With the primary victories, attention now turns to November’s general election. Democrats have been hoping to make inroads in Florida, despite the formerly purple state becoming increasingly red in recent years. Florida last elected a Democrat to the Senate in 2012.
With 53 Republicans in the Senate, Democrats would need to win four seats to flip the chamber. But with limited opportunities for pickups, and a handful of their own seats to defend, Democrats’ ability to take back control of the chamber has appeared to be an uphill battle. With the race in Florida, they’re aiming to improve that picture.
In:
Sisters, aged 14 and 15, go missing days apart in northern Germany
Get you up to speed: Sisters, 14 and 15, disappear without trace within days of each other | News World
Loyza Stoianovych, 14, and her sister Regina, 15, have gone missing from Güstrow, northern Germany, with Loyza disappearing on August 11 and Regina on August 13. Police believe the teenagers, who are known to frequently run away, could be together and may be travelling to the Berlin area.
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Police have confirmed an ongoing investigation into the disappearances of Loyza and Regina Stoianovych, who may be together and could be in the Berlin area. Authorities issued a public appeal after a week due to the sisters’ history of frequent runaway incidents.
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Police have issued a public appeal for assistance in locating missing sisters Loyza and Regina Stoianovych, who disappeared from a group home in Güstrow just days apart. Authorities believe the teenagers may be together and could be in the Berlin area, with warnings that they are known to be frequent runaways.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether the sisters have been located or if they are still missing.
Sisters, aged 14 and 15, go missing days apart in northern Germany

Regina and Loyza Stoianovych went missing earlier this month (Picture: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Police)
Two sisters have gone missing from a small town within days of each other.
Loyza Stoianovych, 14, went missing from Güstrow, northern Germany, on August 11.
Two days later her sister Regina, 15, also disappeared from their group home.
Officers have been unable to track down the teenagers, from Ukraine, who police believe could be together.

Loyza went missing first and is 1.55 meters tall (Picture: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Police)

Regina disappeared at 10pm two days later
Sign up for all of the latest stories
The sisters are reportedly known to be frequent runaways, which is why the police waited a week before issuing a public appeal for help.
Loyza was last seen at approximately 1.30pm on August 11. She is 1.55 meters tall, slim, and has medium-length black hair.
Regina disappeared at approximately 10:00 PM on August 13th. She is 1.65 meters tall, has an average build, and also has medium-length black hair.
‘It cannot be ruled out that the two teenagers are traveling out of a sense of adventure and may be in the Berlin area,’ the police statement read.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
French film producer Nicolas Altmayer and partner Mathilde Favier die in crash
French film producer Nicolas Altmayer and partner Mathilde Favier die in crash
French film producer Nicolas Altmayer and Dior public relations director Mathilde Favier died in a car crash in Deux-Sèvres while overtaking a truck.
Altmayer and Favier’s deaths profoundly affect French cinema and fashion, removing key figures who significantly contributed to the cultural landscape of France and its international reputation.
“I am deeply saddened to learn of the tragic and sudden passing of Mathilde Favier, whose passion and talent were invaluable to the House of Dior,” said LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault.
French film producer Nicolas Altmayer and Dior PR director Mathilde Favier killed in car crash

Published on
French film producer Nicolas Altmayer and his partner, Dior public relations director Mathilde Favier, have died in a car crash in France, according to local authorities.
The couple were travelling through the Deux-Sèvres department of western France when their vehicle hit an oncoming truck while attempting an overtake, Nicolas Leclainche, the deputy public prosecutor in the town of Niort, said.
Altmayer, 61, was a film producer known for his work on titles such as “In the House, the “OSS 117” series, and “Young & Beautiful.”
Favier, 57, was a director in Dior’s public relations team, where the company said she made an “incredible contribution to the reputation of Christian Dior Couture through her commitment and elegance.”
In a statement following the news of their deaths, LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault said he was “deeply saddened to learn of the tragic and sudden passing of Mathilde Favier, who devoted so many years to putting her passion, energy and talent at the service of the House of Dior.”
“My heartfelt condolences go to her family and loved ones,” he added.
Tributes for Altmayer have also poured in from across the film industry and beyond.
Catherine Pégard, France’s Culture Minister, called Altmayer a “producer with a seasoned eye” who “spanned three decades of French cinema, never ceasing to leave his mark on it.”
“Their joint passing has cast a shadow over two worlds which, one through the stories it creates and the other through the silhouettes it crafts, together carry France’s cultural influence far and wide,” she added.
Additional sources • AFP
Trump Administration Moves to Open Millions of Acres for Logging in Forests
Media Lens: Trump Administration Moves to Open Millions of Acres for Logging in Forests
Trump Administration moves to open national forests to logging.
The Trump administration is moving to open millions of national forest acres to logging. This decision has prompted significant discussion among environmentalists and lawmakers, according to coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.
What happened
The Trump administration has initiated moves to open millions of acres of national forests to logging, sparking significant environmental concerns. This decision aims to ease restrictions likely intended for resource extraction and timber production.
Key facts
- The Trump administration has proposed opening millions of acres of national forests to logging.
- The move aims to allow timber harvesting in pristine national forest areas.
- This action affects 44 million acres of national forest land.
- The administration claims it is necessary for forest management and economic growth.
- The decision has drawn criticism from environmental groups and conservationists.
Where coverage differs
- Outlet A emphasizes environmental impacts, while Outlet B emphasizes economic benefits.
- Outlet C foregrounds regulatory implications rather than public opinion.
- Outlet D prioritizes environmental conservation over development opportunities.
One story, four angles
WSJ – Trump Administration Moves to Open Millions of National-Forest Acres to Logging
Publication: WSJ | Primary framing pattern: policy | Tone: critical | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article highlights the Trump administration’s decision to open vast forest areas for logging, emphasizing the policy shift and its implications for environmental protections. The coverage ranges from potential economic benefits to ecological concerns, reflecting a significant change in land use policy.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is placed on the potential environmental consequences of increased logging.
Framing analysis: The article foregrounds the environmental implications and potential backlash from environmentalists, while economic arguments supporting the policy are presented as secondary points.
Bias: Selection: Focuses on negative environmental impacts over economic benefits. Language: Uses terms like “assault” to describe the policy. Omission: Limited exploration of economic benefits.
Assessment: The article successfully critiques the administration’s policy but could provide more balance by exploring its economic arguments.
The New York Times – Trump Administration Moves to Allow Logging in Pristine National Forests
Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: moral | Tone: alarming | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: highly negative | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: The Times article argues that the Trump administration’s move to allow logging in previously protected forests threatens biodiversity and undermines conservation efforts. It frames the decision as a moral failure, emphasizing ecological responsibility and the long-term consequences for the environment.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is on the dangers to biodiversity and environmental ethics.
Framing analysis: The focus is heavily on the moral obligation to protect natural resources, while economic justifications are minimized.
Bias: Selection: Highlights ecological threats while lessening economic perspectives. Language: Use of strong adjectives like “pristine” and “threatening.” Omission: Little mention of potential economic incentives or benefits.
Assessment: The moral framing effectively conveys urgency regarding environmental protection but lacks recognition of the economic context.
The Hill – Trump moves to strip protections from 44M acres of national forest
Publication: The Hill | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: contentious | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: This article discusses the political motivations behind the Trump administration’s decision to strip protections from national forests, suggesting that the move serves political interests rather than environmental concerns. It emphasizes opposition from various political factions, portraying the action as controversial and divisive.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is on the political implications and criticisms of the decision.
Framing analysis: The political context is foregrounded, highlighting the divisions in opinion and potential backlash, while environmental issues are noted but secondary.
Bias: Selection: Focuses on political ramifications over environmental impacts. Language: Employs terms like “strip protections” to indicate aggression. Omission: Limited coverage of on-the-ground consequences for local ecosystems.
Assessment: The coverage effectively highlights the political battle over land use but could enhance the analysis of ecological consequences.
vox.com – Trump’s latest assault on public lands
Publication: vox.com | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: dire | Intensity: 9/10 | Sentiment: highly negative | Legal precision: high
Expand
Espresso Shot: Vox portrays the Trump administration’s actions as a severe threat to natural environments, highlighting the dire consequences of stripping protections from national forests. This narrative underscores the long-term risks to biodiversity and public health, positioning the administration’s policies as reckless.
Publication emphasis: The emphasis is on the severe ecological ramifications and threats posed to public lands.
Framing analysis: The consequential framing is dominant, warning of irreversible damage to ecosystems, while arguments in favor of logging are largely absent.
Bias: Selection: Prioritizes ecological disaster narratives over economic gain. Language: Uses phrases like “assault” to convey urgency. Omission: Minimal mention of potential benefits for local economies.
Assessment: Vox delivers a compelling case regarding the consequences of these policies, though it could acknowledge economic perspectives for a more comprehensive view.
Food for thought
The Wall Street Journal frames the Trump administration’s move to open millions of national forest acres to logging with a focus on regulatory adjustments aimed at economic growth, presenting a legal rationale that underscores forest management flexibility. In contrast, The New York Times adopts a more escalatory framing by depicting this initiative as a significant threat to pristine ecosystems, emphasizing potential environmental degradation. Vox amplifies the alarm by characterizing the actions as a direct attack on public lands, positioning the administration’s strategies as a broader systematic erosion of protections. The Hill underscores the ramifications for environmental safeguards, highlighting potential legal challenges. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.










