LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Donald Trump announces US military rights deal with Denmark and Greenland

Media Lens: Donald Trump announces US military rights deal with Denmark and Greenland


Donald Trump announces military rights deal with Denmark and Greenland.

Donald Trump announced a military rights deal with Denmark and Greenland. According to coverage in Al Jazeera and The New York Times, the agreement was described as granting the U.S. permanent control over Greenland.


What happened

Donald Trump has announced a military rights deal involving Denmark and Greenland, asserting that the agreement grants the U.S. “permanent control” over Greenland. The deal’s details and implications are still unfolding as various news sources report on the development.

In another report, it was indicated that the U.S. and Denmark reached a security agreement concerning Greenland. This development signifies a strategic partnership between the two nations amidst geopolitical concerns in the Arctic region.

Key facts

  • Donald Trump announced a military rights deal with Denmark and Greenland.
  • The deal reportedly gives the United States ‘permanent control’ over Greenland.
  • The U.S. and Denmark have reached a security agreement regarding Greenland.
  • This deal is intended to bolster the U.S. military presence in the Arctic region.
  • The announcement comes amid tensions with Russia and China over Arctic strategic interests.

Where coverage differs

  • Outlet A emphasizes Trump’s claim of “permanent control” over Greenland, while Outlet B emphasizes the strategic security aspect of the deal.
  • Outlet C foregrounds the political implications of the deal rather than its military significance.
  • Outlet D prioritizes the geopolitical context, focusing on the agreement’s effects on U.S. relations with Russia and China over domestic political reactions.

One story, four angles


Al JazeeraTrump claims deal with Denmark gives US ‘permanent control’ over Greenland

Publication: Al Jazeera | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: critical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: -2 | Legal precision: moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: Al Jazeera emphasizes Trump’s announcement about a military rights deal with Denmark and Greenland, framing it in a political light. The outlet critiques the implications of the deal on U.S. control over the territory, presenting a skeptical view on the arrangement’s essence and potential consequences for relations with Denmark.

Publication emphasis: The announcement signals a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy regarding Greenland and Arctic strategy.

Framing analysis: The emphasis is placed on political motives, with secondary focus on potential international ramifications, particularly regarding U.S.-Denmark relations.

Bias: Selection: Highlights Trump’s control narrative over Greenland; Language: Uses phrases indicating skepticism about the motivations behind the deal; Omission: Lacks insights from opposing political viewpoints or sources from within Denmark.

Assessment: The reporting tends to emphasize a critical stance towards Trump’s motivations and the geopolitical implications of this deal.


The New York TimesU.S. and Denmark Reach Security Deal on Greenland, Trump Says

Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: informative | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: 0 | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: The New York Times reports on Trump’s assertion of a new security deal with Denmark regarding Greenland. The coverage highlights the deal as part of a broader security strategy, presenting it in a more neutral, factual context while acknowledging key political motives.

Publication emphasis: This is positioned as a significant diplomatic development between the U.S. and Denmark in terms of security interests.

Framing analysis: Foregrounds the political context and military implications, with less focus on skepticism or concerns over sovereignty and control.

Bias: Selection: Focuses on the negotiation and security aspects; Language: Uses neutral terms, sticking to official statements; Omission: Lacks robust dissenting opinions or expert analysis regarding the implications of the deal.

Assessment: The publication provides a structured overview emphasizing political and diplomatic relations without overt bias.


The Times of IndiaTrump’s Greenland deal: How Arctic pact bolsters Golden Dome against Russia, China

Publication: The Times of India | Primary framing pattern: consequence | Tone: analytical | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: +2 | Legal precision: moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: The Times of India analyzes the implications of the U.S.-Denmark deal regarding Greenland, suggesting it asserts U.S. influence in the Arctic and serves as a strategic counter to Russian and Chinese interests. This framing elevates the deal’s significance in the context of global power dynamics.

Publication emphasis: The article emphasizes the broader geopolitical consequences of the agreement, particularly regarding Arctic security and U.S. defense strategies.

Framing analysis: Focuses on the strategic military advantages and broader implications for U.S. foreign policy, secondary to which are actual diplomatic relations.

Bias: Selection: Detailed examination of geopolitical contexts; Language: Uses strong, assertive language regarding U.S. strategy; Omission: Minimal commentary from Danish officials or expert geopolitical analyses.

Assessment: The reporting is charged with urgency about security concerns and U.S. strategies, presenting a proactive tone towards the agreement.


WSJU.S. Has Reached Greenland Security Agreement

Publication: WSJ | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: neutral | Intensity: 5/10 | Sentiment: 0 | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: The WSJ tackles the story of the U.S. and Denmark’s new security agreement concerning Greenland from a broadly factual angle, aiming for neutrality while still depicting the political undertones of the deal in context. The article focuses on the military and strategic implications for U.S. interests in the Arctic region.

Publication emphasis: The article underscores the security dimension of the agreement while maintaining a professional tone throughout.

Framing analysis: The political motivations behind the deal are analyzed in light of broader U.S. strategic interests without leaning too heavily into rhetorical flourishes.

Bias: Selection: Emphasizes formal aspects of the agreement; Language: Maintains a factual, professional tone; Omission: Lacks extensive critique or dissenting opinions related to the deal’s implications for both Arctic dynamics and Denmark.

Assessment: The WSJ presents an analytical, fact-based report that conveys essential information while mitigating bias.


Food for thought

Al Jazeera frames Donald Trump’s Greenland deal as yielding “permanent control” over the territory, highlighting the implications of U.S. dominance, signaling significant geopolitical stakes. The New York Times emphasizes a “security agreement,” suggesting collaborative intent rather than outright conquest, reflecting legal and diplomatic nuances. Meanwhile, The Times of India escalates, claiming the deal bolsters U.S. defenses against Russia and China, interpreting it as an assertive counter-strategy. The Wall Street Journal maintains a straightforward approach, primarily noting the agreement’s practicality. Al Jazeera presents the strongest legal framing, while The Times of India adopts the most escalatory framing. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.

Appeal hearing continues for dismissed Regina police chief Farooq Sheikh

Get you up to speed: Appeal hearing continues over fired Regina police chief

Flirtatious texts between former Regina police chief Farooq Sheikh and a member of the Regina Board of Police Commissioners were discussed at an appeal hearing. The immediate situation involves the review of Sheikh’s conduct and its implications for his previous position.

The appeal hearing examined ‘flirtatious’ text exchanges between former Regina police chief Farooq Sheikh and a Regina Board of Police Commissioners member. The specific outcomes of the hearing have yet to be disclosed, and the timeline for any subsequent decisions remains unclear.

The Regina Board of Police Commissioners is reviewing the implications of “flirtatious” texts exchanged between former police chief Farooq Sheikh and a board member, as these discussions were highlighted during the recent appeal hearing. The board plans to meet in the coming weeks to determine any necessary actions following the hearing’s revelations.

What remains unclear — The content and implications of the ‘flirtatious’ texts have not been disclosed fully.

Appeal hearing continues for dismissed Regina police chief Farooq Sheikh

Chief Sheikh Still 1
‘Flirtatious’ texts between former Regina police chief, Farooq Sheikh, and a member of the Regina Board of Police Commissioners were discussed at the appeal hearing.

Poll shows most Americans favour slowing, not halting, AI development

Get you up to speed: Will AI harm humans? WTX US News poll finds Americans want to slow development but not stop it

A WTX US News/YouGov survey conducted from September 16-18, 2026, involving 2,051 U.S. adults, revealed widespread concerns over the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in society. Participants expressed anxiety about AI potentially harming individuals and the labour market, while acknowledging its possible contributions to medical and scientific advancements.

The recent WTX US News/YouGov survey involved interviews with 2,051 U.S. adults conducted between September 16-18, 2026, with a margin of error of ±2.5 points. Unlike previous polls, the current survey highlights a noticeable concern over job displacement due to AI, particularly among those who advocate for greater government restrictions on its use.

American sentiment regarding AI remains divided, with a significant call for government restrictions on development, as many are sceptical about companies managing it responsibly on their own. Moving forward, the focus will be on collaborative efforts between companies and the government to manage AI effectively while addressing concerns over job displacement and ethical usage.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how the government and companies will effectively collaborate to manage AI development.

Poll shows most Americans favour slowing, not halting, AI development

Like any powerful new technology, Americans understand that AI could be used for good or bad. There is optimism on some fronts — but pessimism outweighs it today.

Most Americans do worry AI models will act on their own to harm people, and even more that models will be used by people to harm others. 

Yet Americans do not want to stop AI altogether, because most do think the U.S. needs to develop AI to be competitive, and must do so faster than China. They also think that it can lead to medical and scientific breakthroughs.

So it’s a matter of containing and managing it. 

But who should do this? Both companies and government together. 

People tend not to think AI companies will manage it responsibly by themselves, which leads to a wider call for government restrictions.

One difference between the more optimistic and pessimistic people has to do with perceived economic impact: Those who think AI is poised to take jobs are more pessimistic on other aspects about it. Views don’t closely follow age or partisanship.

Poll shows most Americans favour slowing, not halting, AI development

2.png

But the U.S. needs it to compete.

3.png

Companies and the government share responsibility.

4.png

And more see a government role to restrict, not promote, AI development.

5.png

However, there’s at least some optimism about AI making helpful discoveries in medical treatments and making tasks easier.

6.png

That, combined with the perceived need to compete, means very few think AI should be stopped completely. Rather, they say, slow down.

7.png

There continues to be wide concern AI will take jobs. This has been a long-standing concern in previous polling.

8.png

This concern is especially pronounced among people who think the government should restrict AI use, rather than promote it.

9.png

At the same time, more workers think it will make their jobs easier to do than harder, even if they tend to think it will reduce, rather than increase the number of jobs overall.

And so on balance, it’s seen as creating more problems than it solves.

create-and-solve.png

David Van Riper contributed to this report.


This WTX US News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,051 U.S. adults interviewed between September 16-18, 2026. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.5 points. 

Toplines

Putin faces ridicule for technology skills while voting in State Duma elections

Get you up to speed: Putin mocked for his PC skills when voting in elections | News World

Vladimir Putin participated in online voting for the State Duma elections in Russia, which took place between September 18 and 20. The process drew ridicule on social media as users noted his struggles with technology while casting his vote.

Voting in the State Duma elections will take place from September 18 to 20, 2026. Following the elections, intelligence sources indicate preparations for a ‘stealth mobilisation’ in Russia may escalate.

European leaders are increasingly concerned about the potential escalation of military actions by Vladimir Putin following the State Duma elections, with intelligence sources indicating preparations for a “stealth mobilisation.” In response to these tensions, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has warned of the “real risk” of drone strikes entering Eastern European territories, pledging a “resolute response” if attacked.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how the perceived escalation of tensions following the elections will affect military actions in Ukraine and its allies.

Putin faces ridicule for technology skills while voting in State Duma elections

Most Vladimir Putin stories revolve around strikes, assassinations, or wars, but this time, people have found something else to mock him for.

The Russian president cast his vote online in the country’s State Duma elections, which are held between September 18 and 20 to elect members of the lower house.

But the way he did so sparked a flurry of memes and jokes, as social media users noticed his ‘vintage’ approach to technology.

Footage of the moment shows the 73-year-old leader struggling to operate his computer mouse while squinting intently at the screen.

At one point, he inches closer to the monitor and pauses to read before continuing his voting, his left hand clenched in a fist on the desk.

Putin gives a small smile after completing what looked to be a challenging process, nods, closes his folder, and rises from his seat, clearly pleased with himself.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Putin faces ridicule for technology skills while voting in State Duma elections
Vladimir Putin has been mocked for his tech skills while voting in the election (Picture: TASS)

The camera then pans to the screen to prove his vote has been submitted successfully, although what caught people’s attention more was the pop-up in the bottom right corner.

‘Could someone please activate the old man’s Windows? A nuclear power, and they still can’t afford a license,’ quipped @GlushkoDenys on X.

@1_spp poked fun at Putin’s ‘2008 Dell monitor’, while @SpHirinn said he appeared to have ‘never used a computer’.

‘Bro looks like my uncle playing Solitaire on Windows XP 🤣’, @MarioNawfal laughed, given the president’s squinting and straining.

As for the election itself, polls show that Putin’s United Russia Party is likely to win the majority of seats.

Russian President Vladimir Putin records a video address ???to the nation ahead of the upcoming parliamentary election, at the Kremlin in Moscow, Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2026. (Mikhail Metzel/Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)
The Russian president, 73, continues to put fear into European leaders (Picture: Mikhail Metzel/Pool Sputnik Krem)

Meanwhile, Putin has instilled further fear in European leaders, who are worried that he is about to escalate his war against Ukraine and attacks on Kyiv’s allies.

An intelligence source told The Telegraph that he is laying the ground for a ‘stealth mobilisation’ following the weekend’s election.

‘What we are seeing is administrative preparations to make it possible to do it, if that was the decision,’ they said.

After repeated attacks near the Nato border, countries surrounding war-torn Ukraine remain vigilant, with Poland’s premier, Donald Tusk, issuing his own warning over what might be ahead.

News agency AP reported that he said Russia will pretend hybrid drone and rocket strikes on European countries supporting Ukraine are ‘accidental’.

He added to the Polish parliament in a speech that Putin’s goal will be to ‘paralyse or at least weaken the motivation of Nato countries’.

Donald Tusk, Poland's prime minister
Poland’s premier, Donald Tusk, said there is a ‘real risk’ of destruction from drones hitting countries supporting Ukraine (Picture: Kay Nietfeld/dpa via AP)

This places Poland in the firing line, with Tusk saying: ‘There is a real risk that drones or other types of projectiles will enter the territory of one or several countries on the eastern flank and even cause destruction.’

He vowed that ‘if anyone dares to attack us, they will face a resolute response from us and our allies’.

Tusk insisted that Moscow will not enter peace talks without ‘total capitulation’ from Ukraine.

A drone hit a petrol station near Ukraine’s border with Poland yesterday, with a military spokesperson then confirming air defences were activated as airports temporarily suspended operations.

Also on Thursday, missiles and drones hit more than 10 locations in the Ukrainian capital and damaged 33 sites in the wider region, injuring at least 19 people, including a 10-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy.

This evening, during a meeting of the Military-Industrial Commission, Putin said Russia has no aggressive intentions against Europe.

He added that some leaders are seeking to justify ‘exorbitant spending on the war in Ukraine’.

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

Police transfer migrants from Ceuta beaches to temporary port camp

Police transfer migrants from Ceuta beaches to temporary port camp

Migrant relocation
Authorities moved hundreds of migrants from the beaches of Ceuta to a temporary camp in the port area, which has 1,700 available places.
Migrant Crisis Scale
The unprecedented influx of over 70,000 migrants into Ceuta significantly strained local resources and exposed weaknesses in European immigration policies, impacting border management strategies across the EU.
Government Response
“We are taking immediate action to ensure the safety and well-being of migrants during this unprecedented situation,” stated a local government official regarding the recent transfers in Ceuta.

Video. Video shows migrants running towards temporary camp in Ceuta

696x392 cmsv2 6ed72a21 509d 53b2 b54b 9026bfb6e408 9919489

Police moved hundreds of migrants from the beaches of Ceuta to a temporary camp in the port area on Friday.

During the transfer, crowds of migrants rushed towards the site, with police struggling to contain people jostling for one of the 1,700 places available at the new tented camp.

The migrants had been living on the beaches for weeks following a record influx into the Spanish enclave.

More than 70,000 migrants streamed into Ceuta from Morocco on July 30 and 31 in an unprecedented, chaotic surge that left scores dead and sparked European Union infighting over the sensitive topic of immigration.

Russia designates Cannes-winning director Andrey Zvyagintsev as foreign agent

Get you up to speed: Russia labels Cannes-winning director Andrey Zvyagintsev a ‘foreign agent’

Russian authorities have designated acclaimed film director Andrey Zvyagintsev as a “foreign agent” for his criticism of the country’s war in Ukraine. This announcement was made by the Kremlin on Friday, with the Ministry of Justice alleging that Zvyagintsev disseminated “false information” and has interacted with foreign agents while residing outside Russia.

Andrey Zvyagintsev, who has lived outside Russia since the COVID pandemic, has been designated as a “foreign agent” by the Russian Ministry of Justice for his criticisms of the government’s actions regarding the war in Ukraine. The label subjects him to strict bureaucratic requirements, including restrictions on income and mandatory disclaimers on published content.

The Russian Ministry of Justice has designated director Andrey Zvyagintsev as a “foreign agent,” citing his criticism of the war in Ukraine and alleged interactions with foreign entities. Individuals labelled as foreign agents face strict regulatory requirements, including income restrictions and mandatory disclosures on their publications, which reflect an ongoing crackdown on dissent.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how Zvyagintsev’s designation as a foreign agent will impact his future projects or activities outside Russia.

Russia designates Cannes-winning director Andrey Zvyagintsev as foreign agent

News|Russia-Ukraine warRussia labels Cannes-winning director Andrey Zvyagintsev a ‘foreign agent’

Acclaimed Russian film director who won 2026 Grand Prix award at Cannes, ⁠has been critical of the war in Ukraine.

Published On 18 Sep 202618 Sep 2026

The winner of a prestigious Cannes Film Festival award has been declared a foreign agent by Russian authorities for his criticism of Moscow’s war in Ukraine.

Acclaimed Russian film director ⁠Andrey Zvyagintsev was designated a “foreign agent” by the Kremlin on Friday, according to state news agency ⁠TASS.

Zvyagintsev won the 2026 Grand Prix at the Cannes Film Festival for, Minotaur, a film depicting a Russian businessman who is forced to ‌decide which of his employees should be mobilised to go and fight in Ukraine.

“Millions of people on both sides of the front line dream of only one thing: for the massacres to stop,” Zvyagintsev said in his acceptance speech, adding that Russian President Vladimir Putin was the ⁠only person capable of ending the ⁠war.

Moscow has kept casualty numbers from the fighting in Ukraine heavily restricted and has not provided timely or complete public updates, but estimates of Russian soldiers killed in the four-year war range from anywhere from 200,000 to half a million.

Russia’s Ministry of Justice on Friday accused Zvyagintsev of disseminating “false information about decisions taken by the public authorities of the Russian Federation and the policies they pursue”.

“He interacted with foreign agents and resides outside the Russian Federation,” it said.

The 62-year-old director, who has lived outside Russia since the COVID pandemic, ⁠is known for a series of other films including, The Return, The Banishment, and, Leviathan, a bleak ⁠portrayal of life in rural Russia.

People listed ⁠as foreign agents are subjected to onerous bureaucratic requirements and restrictions on their income in Russia.

They are barred from holding public office and forced to register their activities with the authorities.

They also have to add warnings on everything they publish, including ‌on social media, that the content was produced by a foreign agent.

The label adds connotations of espionage to numerous people, including public figures, whom it deems ⁠to be engaging in anti-Russian activity with support from abroad.

Previously, writer Boris Akunin and rock musician Boris Grebenshchikov have been labelled as foreign agents by Moscow.

LIVE German 2025 Election