- Family of British charity worker found dead in suitcase in Greece pays tribute
- Civil Guard examines potential mass migrant crossing into Ceuta on 15 August
- Jason Arday resigns from Cambridge amid ongoing plagiarism investigation
- Poll reveals increasing strain on US adults from extreme heat
- Eight deaths reported on Ontario roads and waterways during Civic Holiday weekend
- Congressional watchdog finds inaccuracies in DOGE’s Wall of Receipts claims
- Electrical fault causes significant disruption to six rail services in England
- Australian politician Mark Parton admits to texting ‘my job is boring’ but denies sending it to a sex worker
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Family of British charity worker found dead in suitcase in Greece pays tribute
Get you up to speed: Family of British charity worker found dead in suitcase pays tribute | News World
The body of Elizabeth-Jane Ross, a 38-year-old charity worker from Edinburgh, was found in a suitcase in Athens on July 18, shortly after she was reported missing from her apartment. Sharif Ahmadzai, 26, an Afghan boxer, has been charged with her murder and is accused of stealing more than €10,000 from her bank account.
Sharif Ahmadzai appeared in court on July 19, facing charges of murder and theft, specifically accused of taking over €10,000 from Elizabeth-Jane Ross’s bank account. Ross had been in Greece since June 26, volunteering with a refugee group before her disappearance on July 16.
Elizabeth-Jane Ross’s family expressed their grief, describing her as “kind, principled and selfless,” while requesting time and privacy to process their loss. Sharif Ahmadzai, the prime suspect, has been charged with her murder and was recently presented in court as investigations continue.
What remains unclear — Authorities have not disclosed the exact circumstances leading to Elizabeth-Jane Ross’s death.
Family of British charity worker found dead in suitcase in Greece pays tribute

Elizabeth-Jane Ross, from Scotland, is described as a ‘kind’ missionary who dedicated her life to helping vulnerable people
A British charity worker found dead inside a suitcase in Greece has been remembered as a ‘kind, principled and selfless.’
The remains of charity worker and Christian missionary Elizabeth-Jane Ross, 38, from Edinburgh, were found dumped in Athens on July 18, three days after she was reported missing from her apartment.
Sharif Ahmadzai, 26, an Afghan boxer, is the prime suspect in the case, and he is accused of killing and transporting her body in a suitcase before dumping it.
Now Ms Ross’s family and friends have paid tribute to their loved one, known as Lisa.
Her family said in a statement: ‘Lisa will always be remembered by us as kind, principled and selfless.
‘Her integrity was absolute, and she dedicated her life to helping others in need.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
‘We are in deep pain, and we ask for time and privacy as we come to terms with our loss.’
Ms Ross had been volunteering with a refugee group in Greece before going missing from her flat on July 16.
She had arrived in Greece on June 26, and stayed with friends until July 10.
Ms Ross’s friend, Magali Tassone, 41, had met her while the pair shared a room at a missionary organisation in Switzerland in 2013.
Speaking to BBC News Scotland, she said her friend had ‘deep compassion’ for women and refugees surviving abuse, and she wanted to help them.
She said her traumatic death was ‘terrible’ and ‘painful.’
Peter Anderson, a pastor at the independent Christian church called City on a Hill in Edinburgh, paid tribute to her in a social media post: ‘We have lost a precious church member, Lisa. She was a member of our church for 20 years, and a very, very precious girl, and it’s a real tragic loss.
‘Lisa’s life was actually all about mission.
‘She served people and she cared for people all over the world.’
Ahmadzai, who arrived in Greece as a refugee via Pakistan, Iran and Turkey as a teenager, appeared in court yesterday charged with Ms Ross’s murder.
He is also accused of stealing over €10,000 from her bank account.
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Civil Guard examines potential mass migrant crossing into Ceuta on 15 August
Civil Guard examines potential mass migrant crossing into Ceuta on 15 August
Spain’s Civil Guard has produced a six-page report examining the potential for mass migrant crossings into Ceuta on 15 August, based on social media activity.
The Civil Guard’s report highlights that social media messages concerning a potential mass crossing have reached groups with memberships exceeding 422,000, indicating a significant mobilisation potential.
“We remain fully vigilant before, during, and after 15 August,” stated Commission spokesperson Guillaume Mercier, emphasising the need for caution regarding unverified reports circulating online.
Reports: Spanish authorities concerned over possible Ceuta migrant crossing on 15 August

Spain’s Civil Guard has produced a six-page report examining the possibility of another mass migrant crossing into the Spanish territory of Ceuta on 15 August.
The document, obtained by Spanish media outlet Mañaneros, is based on a campaign circulating on social media that, according to the report, has reached groups with hundreds of thousands of followers.
The analysis relies entirely on open-source information – social media posts and media reports – and was intended to determine whether the online call to make the crossing was genuine, how widely it had spread, and the degree of coordination behind it.
The report stops short of drawing firm conclusions, however. As cited by RTVE, it said there was no basis for estimating how many people might take part or for assuming that the events seen in late July would be repeated on 15 August.
Its conclusion is that an active online campaign exists with the potential to mobilise people, but whether it will actually result in a mass crossing, how many people would be involved, and who is behind it all remain unknown. The report added that much will depend on Morocco’s preventive measures on roads, at transport hubs, in the town of Fnideq, and along the coast, as well as on Spain’s security operation.
What prompted the investigation?
According to the Civil Guard, the messages first began circulating in late July and early August, when young Moroccans started sharing calls for another collective attempt to reach the North African territory of Ceuta around 15 August.
The report compares coverage from both Spanish and Moroccan media, noting that the issue is no longer confined to Spanish social media. Investigators also examined Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram groups with memberships ranging from around 400,000 to just over 422,000 people, although the report itself cautioned against reading too much into those figures.
Investigators say the most significant factor is not the size of those groups but the recurring patterns they identified: repeated references to 15 August, the same geographical locations, discussions about how to organise the crossing, and the persistence of these messages over several days. Monitoring continued until 4 August.
The report also found a significant amount of misinformation circulating online, including claims that the border would be opened, that migrants would receive asylum or financial assistance, or that anyone reaching Ceuta could not legally be returned.
Who is behind the drive?
The report describes the online campaign as decentralised. Rather than identifying a single organiser, investigators found that the proposed date appeared to spread organically from one online group to another.
Based on the open-source material reviewed, the Civil Guard said it had been unable to identify those responsible for promoting the campaign. It also said it had found no evidence linking it to the Moroccan government, Moroccan security services, or any specific migrant-smuggling network.
But the report dismissed the idea that the campaign was spontaneous. It concluded that there appears to be “some degree of digital facilitation”- in other words, some level of coordination behind the online activity – even though its source and extent remain unclear.
Brussels keeps watch
The European Commission said it was closely monitoring social media ahead of 15 August.
“We remain fully vigilant before, during, and after 15 August,” Commission spokesperson Guillaume Mercier said.
However, Brussels urged caution, stressing that many of the reports circulating online “have not been verified” and that the overall picture remains “unclear.” The Commission said it was staying in close contact with both the Spanish and Moroccan authorities.
It also said it had detected Russian-linked channels that began rapidly amplifying the migration issue from 30 July onwards.
The Commission noted that the European Union can use legislation such as the Digital Services Act (DSA) to tackle online disinformation. The law requires major digital platforms and search engines to assess and mitigate systemic risks to public security. Spain has not, however, activated the DSA’s crisis mechanism, which would allow for enhanced coordination with the platforms.
Jason Arday resigns from Cambridge amid ongoing plagiarism investigation
Media Lens: Jason Arday resigns from Cambridge amid ongoing plagiarism investigation
Story focus: Professor Jason Arday resigns amid plagiarism allegations.
Primary entity: Jason Arday | Region: The main geographic focus is Cambridge, UK.
Professor Jason Arday, Cambridge’s youngest Black professor, has resigned amid allegations of plagiarism. The resignation follows an investigation by the university into these claims.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
Professor Jason Arday, Cambridge University’s youngest Black professor, has resigned amid allegations of plagiarism concerning his academic work. The university is currently conducting an investigation into these claims, which have garnered significant media attention.
Arday, appointed to his role in early 2023, faced scrutiny following reports of potential academic misconduct. His resignation comes as part of an ongoing inquiry into the validity of his published research, which has sparked discussions about academic integrity within esteemed institutions.
Status quo
Professor Jason Arday, noted for being the youngest Black faculty member at the University of Cambridge, has resigned amid allegations of plagiarism. The university has been investigating these claims, which surfaced recently. Arday, appointed in 2022, gained recognition for his research and advocacy in education and academic equity. His resignation comes as academic integrity concerns prompt scrutiny of his work.
Confirmed facts
- Jason Arday has resigned from his position at Cambridge University.
- His resignation is amid allegations of plagiarism.
- Arday was appointed in 2022 and was known as the youngest Black professor at Cambridge.
- He claimed to have been paid £1.4 million by a publisher for his memoir.
Preconceptions
- CBS News prioritizes the details surrounding the allegations of plagiarism against Jason Arday, presenting them as recent news (“4 hours ago”), highlighting immediate reactions.
- The New York Times emphasizes Arday’s status as “Star Scholar” and provides context about his previous acclaim, giving a more reflective angle to his resignation (“23 hours ago”).
- CNN reduces focus on the allegations, instead framing the narrative around Arday as the “youngest Black professor,” thereby prioritizing his identity and the historical significance of his position (“5 hours ago”).
- The Guardian enhances discussions regarding his financial dealings with a mention of a substantial advance for his memoir, which contrasts with other outlets’ focus on the resignation itself (“1 hour ago”).
Elisions
- The coverage from CBS News emphasizes the allegations against Jason Arday, specifically his resignation from Cambridge amid a plagiarism investigation, while The New York Times focuses on the broader implications of his resignation as a prominent figure and its impact on the academic community.
- CNN’s reporting highlights the context of Arday’s position as the youngest Black professor at Cambridge, adding a layer of societal significance to the story, which is less emphasized in both CBS News and The New York Times articles.
- The Guardian takes a unique angle by discussing Arday’s claim of receiving 1.4 million for his memoir, a detail that is not featured in the other sources, indicating a divergence in how each outlet views the circumstances surrounding his resignation.
One story, four angles
CBS News – Jason Arday, Cambridge’s youngest Black professor, resigns amid plagiarism allegations
Publication: CBS News | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The focus is on Arday’s resignation and its context, underlining the seriousness of allegations against him rather than just the act of resignation.
Key differences:
1. Emphasis on background: CBS mentions Arday as “the youngest Black professor” prominently, which is not emphasized equally in other outlets.
2. Specific mention of allegations: The headline clearly states “plagiarism allegations,” prioritizing a legal accountability angle over his achievements.
3. Direct attribution: Uses “CBS News learned” to establish authority, creating a sense of verifiable reporting.
Bias: Selection: Prioritizes allegations over academic accomplishments. | Language: Adopts a serious tone with “resignation amid plagiarism allegations.” | Omission: Lacks contextual references to Arday’s prior achievements or contributions.
Assessment: Readers first perceive a serious issue with Arday’s professional integrity, overshadowing his accomplishments.
The New York Times – Star Scholar Jason Arday Resigns From Cambridge
Publication: The New York Times | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article positions Arday as a “star scholar,” subtly framing his resignation within the narrative of his substantial contributions to academia.
Key differences:
1. Title framing: Calls him a “star scholar,” emphasizing his achievements rather than allegations.
2. Complexity of narrative: It offers a broader context of Arday’s career, touching upon accomplishments and struggles, thus humanizing him.
3. Quotation usage: Inflicts critical quotes about the investigation, ensuring a balanced portrayal, rather than singular focus on resignation.
Bias: Selection: Highlights Arday’s intellectual stature, diverting attention from the gravity of allegations. | Language: Uses “star scholar” to evoke admiration, which may mitigate the seriousness carried in other headlines. | Omission: Less emphasis on the direct consequences of the allegations on his career.
Assessment: The initial takeaway is that the reader is invited to consider Arday’s significant academic contributions alongside the troubling allegations.
CNN – Youngest Black professor at Cambridge resigns as university investigates allegations of plagiarism
Publication: CNN | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The focus captures Arday’s resignation in the context of ongoing investigations, accentuating institutional accountability.
Key differences:
1. Age emphasis: Puts “youngest Black professor” at the forefront, aligning social progress narratives with the controversy.
2. Context of investigation: Stresses “investigation” over allegations, framing the situation more about systemic issues than individual failure.
3. Quote integration: Uses direct quotations from university statements which adds an official layer to the coverage.
Bias: Selection: Highlights Arday’s demographic background, fostering a broader societal discussion. | Language: “Investigates allegations” projects institutional concern, positioning the university as proactive. | Omission: Less focus on the details of the plagiarism allegations themselves, leaning towards a broader investigative context.
Assessment: Readers are made to perceive the situation as reflective of larger institutional practices rather than merely a personal failing.
The Guardian – Jason Arday claimed he was paid ‘1.4 million’ by publisher for memoir
Publication: The Guardian | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The mention of substantial monetary claims contextualizes Arday’s professional narrative amidst allegations, drawing attention to his financial dealings.
Key differences:
1. Financial angle: Highlights monetary claim, suggesting potential motivation behind controversies.
2. Specific language: Uses “claimed he was paid” which implies doubt and an element of speculation.
3. Inclusion of reactions: Cites reactions from various academic circles, enriching the narrative with different perspectives.
Bias: Selection: Focuses on financial claim which could overshadow the core ethical discussions. | Language: Offers a skeptical tone with “claimed,” suggesting uncertainty about the assertion. | Omission: Less emphasis placed on the implications of the allegations on academic integrity itself.
Assessment: Readers are initially inclined to see the issue as intricate, yet potentially sensationalized and financially motivated.
In comparing the coverage of Jason Arday’s resignation, CBS News frames the event with a focus on the implications of plagiarism allegations, highlighting Arday’s status as Cambridge’s youngest Black professor. Conversely, CNN employs a more escalatory tone by emphasizing the university’s investigation, which might suggest a more serious implication of misconduct. The New York Times presents a balanced account, while The Guardian’s coverage hints at sensational aspects like financial details. Ultimately, CBS News offers a measured approach, making it the strongest framing, whereas CNN’s takes on more escalatory undertones. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
CBS News
Professor Jason Arday resigns amid plagiarism allegations
The New York Times
Star Scholar Jason Arday Resigns From Cambridge
CNN
Youngest Black professor at Cambridge resigns as university investigates allegations of plagiarism
The Guardian
Jason Arday claimed he was paid ‘1.4 million’ by publisher for memoir
Poll reveals increasing strain on US adults from extreme heat
Get you up to speed: Poll suggests US adults are facing increased strain from extreme heat
A recent poll conducted by The Associated Press and NORC Center for Public Affairs Research revealed that 66 percent of American adults believe climate change is happening, a decrease from 73 percent in September 2025. The survey, which involved 1,165 respondents in late July 2026, also indicated that more individuals are experiencing significant impacts from extreme heat in their daily lives.
The survey conducted by The Associated Press and the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research involved 1,165 participants and took place in late July 2026. Climatologists at Virginia Tech University have indicated that approximately 60 percent of the US is currently experiencing drought, with 20 percent facing extreme drought conditions.
The CDC has highlighted that excessive heat contributes to over 1,220 deaths annually, with figures rising sharply in recent years, marking 2023 as the deadliest summer for heat-related fatalities in 45 years. In response, experts are warning of increased risks for wildfires and public infrastructure strain, which may escalate discussions on energy costs ahead of the midterm elections.
What remains unclear — The specific long-term implications of the rising electricity costs on household budgets and political responses remain unaddressed.
Poll reveals increasing strain on US adults from extreme heat
News|ClimatePoll suggests US adults are facing increased strain from extreme heat
More than half of Americans told the AP-NORC poll that climate change is happening, a slight decline from last year.
Published On 6 Aug 20266 Aug 2026
A new poll of adults in the United States has revealed that more are feeling a personal impact from extreme heat, but a smaller number believe in climate change.
The poll, released by The Associated Press and the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research on Thursday, was the result of a survey of 1,165 Americans in late July.
According to the survey, 66 percent of Americans believe climate change is happening, a slight decline from the 73 percent who expressed a similar sentiment in September 2025.
About 17 percent said they are not sure if climate change is happening, while 15 percent indicated it is not happening at all.
By contrast, more US adults in this survey were likely to say that extreme heat has either had a “major impact” or “minor impact” on their everyday activities, as opposed to none at all.
Thirty percent of this year’s survey participants, for instance, said extreme heat exerted a “major impact” on their outdoor activities, compared to 21 percent in July 2024.
The number of respondents who said their vacation and travel plans experienced a “major impact” from the heat also jumped from eight to 15 percent.
Exercise routines, sleep patterns and commutes were also identified as aspects of daily life increasingly affected by rising temperatures.
Much of that shift was observed among those who live in the Midwest or on the West Coast. In the West, for instance, the rate of respondents who described heat as having a “major impact” on their outdoor activities was 35 percent, higher than the national average.
Democratic respondents were also more likely than Republican ones to express that the heat had affected their plans.
Climatologists at Virginia Tech University have estimated that, as of May, roughly 60 percent of the US was in a state of drought, with 20 percent of the country facing extreme drought conditions.
Among the hardest hit areas are Colorado and the Southeast, near Florida and Georgia. Virginia Tech climatologists also noted that the La Nina climate pattern earlier this year had a drying effect on the Pacific Northwest, an area typically known for wetter weather.
With the US baking under several heat domes so far this year, experts warn that the higher temperatures could increase the risks of wildfire, threaten crops and impose excessive pressure on public infrastructure, such as energy grids.
Extreme temperatures, for example, often result in consumers using more energy for air conditioning during hotter seasons — and conversely, during colder months, cranking up the heat.
While extreme weather is only one factor that influences electricity bills, rising household energy costs could become a sticking point for politicians during this year’s tense midterm election season.
In Thursday’s poll, about 81 percent of Americans said their electricity bills have seen an impact from extreme heat over the last year, up from 69 percent in July 2024.
“I feel like my utility costs probably doubled in the last three or four years,” Daemien Williams, a bridge inspector who identifies as a Democrat, told The Associated Press. “I do look at my bills pretty in detail and see that the kilowatts and the usage is actually up, not just the price that they’re charging for it.”
Climate change, driven largely by human activities, is considered a major threat across the globe.
Scientists calculated that Earth’s average temperature last year made 2025 one of the three hottest years on record, following records set in 2024 and 2023.
Excessive heat is considered one of the top reasons for weather-related illness and death.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that more than 1,220 deaths each year can be connected to heat as a contributing or underlying cause.
That number rose in 2023, which saw records broken for heat-related deaths in the US.
The Associated Press analysis found that 2,300 people died that summer due to conditions connected to excessive heat, the highest rate in 45 years of records.
Several interviewees told the news outlet they had observed temperatures increasing over the course of their lives.
“When I was a kid, that seemed like a very rare thing when it did hit 100, everybody was like, whoa. And now it’s just every day,” said John Hazel, a crime scene investigator who identifies as a Republican.
“Seasons felt a little more balanced. Now it feels like summer’s a bit lingering. It starts earlier and lasts longer.”
Eight deaths reported on Ontario roads and waterways during Civic Holiday weekend
Get you up to speed: OPP says 8 people died on roads, waterways during deadliest weekend of 2026 so far
Eight people died on Ontario roads and waterways over the Civic Holiday weekend, marking it the deadliest weekend of the year to date for the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP). Authorities have not confirmed specific locations or circumstances surrounding the incidents.
Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) reported that the fatalities occurred across various locations, marking a concerning trend in road and water safety. Investigations into the incidents are ongoing, with authorities working to gather additional details regarding the circumstances surrounding each case.
The Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) confirmed that the Civic Holiday weekend marked the deadliest of the year with eight fatalities on roads and waterways. As a result, the OPP is urging the public to exercise caution and follow safety guidelines to prevent further tragedies.
What remains unclear — The circumstances surrounding each of the eight fatalities have not been detailed by the OPP.
Eight deaths reported on Ontario roads and waterways during Civic Holiday weekend

Eight people died on Ontario roads and waterways over the Civic Holiday weekend, making it the deadliest weekend of the year so far for the OPP.
Congressional watchdog finds inaccuracies in DOGE’s Wall of Receipts claims
Get you up to speed: DOGE’s “wall of receipts” riddled with inaccuracies and unsubstantiated claims, congressional watchdog says
A Government Accountability Office report found that the Department of Government Efficiency’s “Wall of Receipts,” which claimed savings of $110 billion, contained inaccuracies and lacked supporting evidence. The GAO investigation, requested by Senators Richard Blumenthal and Gary Peters, highlighted that many savings reported by the DOGE were already in progress before its establishment in January 2025.
The investigation into the Department of Government Efficiency’s claims highlighted that $110 billion purportedly saved were based on flawed calculations and unsupported estimates. Following operational cessation on July 4, 2026, DOGE failed to respond to requests for information or interviews from the Government Accountability Office.
The Government Accountability Office’s report confirmed that the “Wall of Receipts” from the Department of Government Efficiency significantly overstated taxpayer savings by billions, prompting Senators Richard Blumenthal and Gary Peters to criticise the initiative as misleading. The GAO has recommended that DOGE improve transparency regarding data quality issues and limitations, although DOGE did not respond to the GAO’s requests for information.
What remains unclear — The specific reasons for DOGE’s failure to respond to the GAO’s request for information or interviews have not been disclosed.
Congressional watchdog finds inaccuracies in DOGE’s Wall of Receipts claims
Washington — The Department of Government Efficiency’s infamous “Wall of Receipts” listing billions of dollars DOGE said it saved was riddled with inaccuracies and unsubstantiated claims, a congressional watchdog found.
A Government Accountability Office report released Thursday confirmed previous reporting from WTX US News and other news outlets that found the DOGE team’s updating “Wall of Receipts” overstated how much it was saving taxpayers by billions of dollars. As of July 7, 2026, GAO found that $110 billion in savings DOGE claimed from slashing federal contracts, leases and grants displayed savings estimates that were incorrect or lacked supporting evidence.
For instance, GAO found that 108 of the 264 leases DOGE said it terminated were already in the process of being eliminated before DOGE was established by President Trump in January 2025.
In another case, GAO said DOGE reported it saved $1.7 billion by identifying a Pentagon Defense Health Agency IT contract to terminate, but it never followed through on either terminating or slashing the funding. The GAO probe, requested by Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Gary Peters, covered contracts, grants and leases DOGE listed from Jan. 20, 2025, through July 7, 2026.
DOGE was launched by Elon Musk soon after President Trump took office, and he oversaw and heavily influenced DOGE in its early months. In late May, he left government to return to his companies. Many of the itemized so-called savings were posted to DOGE’s account on Musk’s social media platform X, which has 4.7 million followers.
“Everyone supports rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government, but DOGE was a slapdash and deceptive effort that misled the American people while doing real damage to the government’s ability to serve them,” Peters said in a statement Thursday. “Elon Musk and the Trump administration claimed billions of dollars in savings it could not substantiate, took credit for work already underway, and refused to show its work, all while putting Americans’ sensitive data at risk and hollowing out critical agencies.”
The congressional watchdog noted that information like the Wall of Receipts “can have significant value,” but went on to say that it would be more useful to policymakers and the public if DOGE provided more information about how it calculated savings and disclosed data limitations.
GAO criticized DOGE for lack of transparency and its failure to use its own stated methodology in calculations of the “majority of savings associated with the contracts reported as terminated.”
“For grants, DOGE did not provide sufficient information to verify the method used to calculate 96 percent of DOGE-reported savings,” GAO said.
“While the Wall of Receipts includes some information about the data and sources underlying reported savings, it does not sufficiently disclose limitations affecting data quality,” GAO said. It recommended DOGE “prominently” display data quality issues and limitations on the Wall of Receipts.
WTX US News previously identified other issues with DOGE’s reporting, as well. DOGE stopped publishing details of canceled U.S. Agency for International Development contracts due to what was described as “legal reasons.”
And a WTX US News review of three of the largest cuts DOGE claimed by August 2025 indicated the savings from those contracts were less than 3% of what DOGE said they were.
DOGE concluded its operations on July 4, although the Trump administration has long said agency heads would work to save taxpayers money.
GAO said DOGE “did not respond to GAO’s request for information or interviews.”
Daniel Ruetenik
contributed to this report.
In:
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.










