LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Israel and Hezbollah agree to renew ceasefire amid US-Iran talks delays

Media Lens: Israel and Hezbollah agree to renew ceasefire amid US-Iran talks delays

Story focus: Israel and Hezbollah agree to renew ceasefire.

Primary entity: Not specified   |   Region:

Main Geographic Focus:
Israel and Lebanon

Israel and Hezbollah agreed to renew a ceasefire following recent hostilities. The negotiations occurred amidst reported tensions and discussions involving Iran and the United States in Switzerland.

Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links


What has happened

Recent negotiations between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon have reached a critical juncture, as both parties have agreed to a renewed ceasefire amidst ongoing conflict. This development comes after a series of escalations that were influenced by failed U.S.-Iran talks in Switzerland.

The tensions were exacerbated by multiple Israeli attacks on Hezbollah positions, prompting Iran to delay its participation in negotiations aimed at de-escalating the situation. As a result, both sides have committed to cease hostilities to facilitate further discussions regarding regional stability.

Status quo

No context is necessary.

Confirmed facts

  • Israel and Hezbollah have agreed to renew a ceasefire.
  • The renewal of the ceasefire follows tensions related to US-Iran talks.
  • The talks between the US and Iran were postponed due to recent Israeli attacks in Lebanon.
  • The ceasefire agreement is part of ongoing negotiations involving multiple international stakeholders.

Preconceptions

  • The New York Times prioritizes diplomatic context and ramifications in its coverage of the latest ceasefire negotiations, highlighting the potential impact on U.S.-Iran relations.
  • KSL.com emphasizes human stories and local perspectives on the ceasefire in Lebanon, focusing on residents’ experiences and responses amid the conflict.
  • CNN reduces coverage of individual narratives, instead opting for a faster-paced update format that prioritizes real-time developments in the negotiations.
  • NPR highlights regional sentiments and the humanitarian aspects of the ceasefire more so than the geopolitical strategies discussed, aiming for a more personal touch in its reporting.
  • Each publication processes and emphasizes the ceasefire impact differently, with The New York Times and CNN focusing on broader strategic implications, while KSL.com and NPR lean towards more localized human experiences.

Elisions

  • KSL.com reports on a newly agreed Lebanon ceasefire facilitated by US-Iran talks, while NPR focuses on the perspectives from Beirut during this negotiation. However, neither source clarifies the implications of this ceasefire on ongoing regional dynamics.
  • The New York Times highlights Iran delaying talks due to Israeli actions in Lebanon, while CNN mentions Israel and Hezbollah’s agreement to renew ceasefire. This creates a gap in analyzing how these actions by both countries might affect future diplomatic relations in the region.
  • KSL.com details negotiations between Israel and Lebanon but lacks information on Iran’s role, which is extensively covered by NPR. This presents a gap in understanding the broader geopolitical context of the Lebanon-Israel negotiations.

One story, four angles


KSL.comLebanon ceasefire agreed after US-Iran talks in Switzerland scrapped

Publication: KSL.com | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Good

Expand

Espresso Shot: Readers are directed to focus on the agreement of a ceasefire, framing it as a significant diplomatic achievement following failed talks.

Key differences:
1. **Focus on Outcomes**: KSL emphasizes the ceasefire (“Lebanon ceasefire agreed…”), while others highlight the cancellation of talks.
2. **Specificity**: It provides detailed context about the ceasefire, which is less prevalent in the headlines of other outlets.
3. **Tone**: A neutral tone is utilized to describe events, maintaining a factual reporting style compared to others’ dramatic wording.

Bias: Selection: KSL favors outcomes of negotiations | Language: Uses neutral language, avoiding sensationalism | Omission: Lacks critique on the failed negotiations’ implications.

Assessment: The initial focus leads the reader to believe the ceasefire is a diplomatic success despite surrounding complexities.


The New York TimesIran Delayed Talks After Israeli Attacks in Lebanon, Diplomats Say: Live Updates

Publication: The New York Times | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: The emphasis is on the delay of negotiations, prompting readers to consider factors disrupting diplomatic efforts.

Key differences:
1. **Dramatic Focus**: The headline by NYT highlights delays and tensions (“Iran Delayed Talks”), unlike others framing outcomes.
2. **Urgency**: The use of “Live Updates” suggests an immediate need for information on ongoing situations.
3. **Attribution**: The phrase “Diplomats Say” indicates reliance on secondary sources, as opposed to direct claims found in other outlets.

Bias: Selection: Prioritizes negative developments | Language: Uses urgency to enhance reader concern | Omission: Neglects successful negotiation aspects.

Assessment: The reader is led to believe that escalating tensions are a significant barrier to resolution, overshadowing any positive outcomes.


NPRThe view from Beirut hours into latest ceasefire

Publication: NPR | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Mixed | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: NPR positions the reader to think about the on-ground realities of the situation, extending beyond mere diplomatic language.

Key differences:
1. **Geographical Perspective**: NPR’s focus on Beirut provides a local viewpoint, contrasting the more general diplomatic angles of other outlets.
2. **Human Element**: Highlights local reactions and experiences, drawing attention to the human cost of the conflict, a theme less emphasized elsewhere.
3. **Balance**: Describes both the ceasefire and lingering tensions, presenting a nuanced view rather than a binary outcome as seen in other headlines.

Bias: Selection: Features local perspectives heavily | Language: Personalizes through anecdotes | Omission: Less emphasis on higher-level diplomatic failures.

Assessment: The reader is likely to perceive the situation’s complexity, stressing personal stories over mere political maneuvers.


CNNLive updates: Israel and Hezbollah agree to renew ceasefire after conflict threatens to derail US-Iran talks

Publication: CNN | Intensity: (9/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: CNN’s narrative encourages readers to monitor the developments rapidly, depicting an urgent need for awareness of changing events.

Key differences:
1. **Urgency**: “Live updates” creates a heightened sense of immediacy compared to KSL or NPR’s more static reporting.
2. **Conflict Framing**: The title emphasizes the potential for conflict escalation (“threatens to derail…”), invoking a sense of crisis.
3. **Comprehensive Coverage**: Combines various perspectives, highlighting implications of the ceasefire on global diplomacy.

Bias: Selection: Prioritizes rapid developments | Language: Alarmist phrasing regarding conflict outcomes | Omission: Lacks focus on successful diplomatic efforts or hopeful insights.

Assessment: The reader is inclined to believe that the ceasefire is precarious and understand the broader implications of ongoing conflicts.


In the comparison of news coverage, KSL.com adopts a restrained framing, focusing on the Lebanon ceasefire amidst US-Iran talks. In contrast, The New York Times takes a more escalatory approach, emphasizing tensions with a focus on Israel’s actions prompting delays in negotiations. NPR presents a balanced perspective by reporting the ongoing views from Lebanon. CNN, however, leans into crisis framing, portraying the situation as a significant threat to diplomatic efforts. The strongest framing lies with KSL.com, while the most escalatory is evident in The New York Times. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.


KSL.com

Lebanon ceasefire agreed after US-Iran talks in Switzerland scrapped

The New York Times

Iran Delayed Talks After Israeli Attacks in Lebanon, Diplomats Say: Live Updates

NPR

The view from Beirut hours into latest ceasefire

CNN

Live updates: Israel and Hezbollah agree to renew ceasefire after conflict threatens to derail US-Iran talks

Spain’s Yamal believes it is too early to play full match in World Cup

Get you up to speed: Spain’s Yamal says ‘very early, unnecessary’ to play full World Cup match

Lamine Yamal has stated that he is not ready to play a full match for Spain against Saudi Arabia due to his ongoing recovery from a hamstring injury. Spain’s head coach Luis de la Fuente confirmed Yamal can participate for “an hour” during the World Cup game in Atlanta.

Spain’s coach Luis de la Fuente stated that Lamine Yamal will likely be able to play up to an hour in the upcoming match against Saudi Arabia. Yamal returned to the squad after a hamstring injury, but Spain has struggled historically at World Cups, not advancing past the last 16 since 2010.

Lamine Yamal expressed reservations about playing a full match for Spain against Saudi Arabia, stating, “It’s very early, it’s unnecessary,” as he continues recovering from a hamstring injury. Coach Luis de la Fuente indicated that Yamal would be fit to play “an hour” in the upcoming match after making a brief substitute appearance against Cape Verde.

What remains unclear — It is not confirmed how many minutes Lamine Yamal will be able to play in the match against Saudi Arabia.

Spain’s Yamal believes it is too early to play full match in World Cup

Sport|World Cup 2026Spain’s Yamal says ‘very early, unnecessary’ to play full World Cup match

‘It’s not the time to play a whole match,’ Lamine Yamal said ahead of Spain’s match against Saudi Arabia.

Published On 19 Jun 202619 Jun 2026

Spain star Lamine Yamal says it is “too soon” for him to play a full 90 minutes as he continues his recovery from a hamstring injury, ahead of the European champions’ World Cup game against Saudi Arabia.

“It’s very early, it’s unnecessary,” the 18-year-old said on Friday.

“It’s not the time to play a whole match, but I can play whatever minutes the coach wants,” he told Spanish public broadcaster RTVE about his readiness to play an entire game.

Luis de la Fuente’s men were held to a surprise goalless draw by debutants Cape Verde in their Group H opener and will be hoping to get up and running on Sunday when they face the Saudis.

On Monday, Barcelona winger Yamal made his first appearance since suffering the injury in mid-April, coming on as a 71st-minute substitute against Cape Verde.

Coach De la Fuente told Radio Cope on Thursday that Yamal would be able to play “an hour” this weekend in Atlanta.

Yamal could not inspire his teammates in the closing stages against a dogged Cape Verde, but his Barcelona teammate Pau Cabarsi backed him to deliver at the tournament.

“We already know Lamine’s qualities,” Cabarsi said Friday.

“Whether he comes on or not, he’ll help us as much as possible – but I think whoever plays in his place will do just as well.”

Spain were the pre-tournament title favourites, but they have not got past the last 16 at a World Cup since lifting the trophy for the first time in 2010.

Whale sanctuary in Nova Scotia holds groundbreaking ceremony amid challenges

Get you up to speed: Whale sanctuary in Nova Scotia holds groundbreaking ceremony despite setbacks

The non-profit group planning a whale sanctuary held a groundbreaking ceremony in Nova Scotia. This marks the start of a facility intended to support retired whales.

The non-profit group has confirmed that construction of the sanctuary is set to begin immediately, with plans for completion within the next two years. Investigators are currently assessing the site to ensure compliance with environmental regulations before any further development takes place.

The project to establish a whale sanctuary in Nova Scotia has received backing from local officials, who expressed support during the groundbreaking ceremony held by the non-profit organisation on Friday. Plans are in place to monitor the sanctuary’s development closely, with updates expected as the project progresses further.

What remains unclear — The specific timeline for the sanctuary’s completion has not been disclosed.

Whale sanctuary in Nova Scotia holds groundbreaking ceremony amid challenges

whale sanctuary
The non-profit group planning a whale sanctuary in Nova Scotia held a groundbreaking ceremony Friday to mark the beginning of what’s promised to be a haven for retired whales.

Iran war strains relationship between Trump and Netanyahu

Get you up to speed: How the Iran war united, and then divided Trump and Israel’s Netanyahu

Israeli jets struck Beirut, Lebanon, on Sunday, resulting in at least three fatalities. This attack occurred hours before a planned announcement by President Trump regarding a deal with Iran to extend a ceasefire and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Netanyahu has stated that Israel will not withdraw from Lebanon until the Hezbollah threat is fully eliminated, despite the recent signing of a U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement that includes provisions for Lebanon. Following significant clashes that resulted in civilian and military casualties, direct talks regarding the next phase of the U.S.-Iran deal have been postponed.

President Trump expressed strong disapproval of the Israeli airstrike in Beirut, questioning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s judgement during a conversation following the attack. Israeli officials indicated that negotiations with Hezbollah remain unlikely despite a U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement, complicating the situation and delaying scheduled talks in Switzerland.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether President Trump will impose any consequences on Netanyahu if conflicts in Lebanon continue to jeopardise the US-Iran ceasefire negotiations.

Iran war strains relationship between Trump and Netanyahu

The stage — and the cage — were set Sunday at the White House as President Trump prepared to mark his 80th birthday with a long-planned night of UFC combat, and an announcement of a long-awaited deal with Iran to extend a ceasefire and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. 

Hours before it was to be signed, however, Israeli jets struck Lebanon’s capital Beirut, killing at least three people.

“This morning’s attack on Beirut should not have happened, particularly on a special day when we are so close to a Peace Deal with Iran,” Mr. Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

His call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu soon after was less diplomatic.

“What the f*** are you doing?” he asked his close ally, according to Fox News’ Trey Yingst

“Why did Bibi have to do a f*****g attack?” the President said to Axios shortly after. “I was so pissed off. I let him know. He has no f*****g judgement.”

It was a remarkable exchange between world leaders whose relationship has vacillated dramatically, and often publicly, over the course of many years.  

“Who the f*** does he think he is?”

The answer to President Trump’s question about why Netanyahu ordered the Beirut attack cuts to the heart of how the more than three-and-a-half month Iran war has driven a wedge between the two leaders.

Mr. Trump campaigned on a promise to end “forever wars.” He told Americans the joint U.S.-Israeli war with Iran would last a maximum of six weeks (among many and varying estimates), and he suggested the objective was a Venezuela-style operation. 

It quickly became clear that such a brief foray was not in the cards, however. 

More recently, with midterms looming in November and Americans’ views on both the war and Mr. Trump becoming less favorable, he has appeared keen to extract the U.S. and get the Strait of Hormuz reopened to ease global gas and oil prices.

Netanyahu, on the other hand, has never supported a political agreement with Iran’s theocratic rulers. He has called it his “life’s work” to ensure Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon, and promised this war would end in a “total victory.”

On the second day of joint U.S.-Israeli strikes, Netanyahu called it something he had “been hoping to do for 40 years, to strike the terrorist regime squarely in the face,” and he thanked “my friend, the President of the United States, Donald Trump,” for joining in the mission.

Netanyahu is also facing an election, in October at the latest, and if he’s seen to have failed to meet his objectives, it may make his job harder to hold onto — and make it more likely that he’ll have to face a longstanding corruption trial waiting for him when he exits Israel’s highest office. 

To the north, thousands of Israelis remain displaced from their homes due to the threat of rocket and drone attacks by Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon. A large majority of Israelis want their country to keep fighting Hezbollah until it is completely quashed. 

“Netanyahu, for political reasons, can’t end this war because he hasn’t delivered these incredible promises, and because he doesn’t want to face a reckoning with the Israeli public,” Anshel Pfeffer, a veteran Israel correspondent for The Economist, told WTX US News on Thursday. “It was pretty clear, I think, from the very beginning of the war that this would be the junction where Netanyahu and Trump would part ways.”

Netanyahu has riled American presidents before. Bill Clinton reportedly said after meeting him in 1996, “Who the f**k does he think he is?” 

President Biden, in 2024, reportedly called him “a bad f*****g guy.”

But Mr. Trump’s recent public excoriations of Netanyahu were unprecedented — and a far cry from a warm February meeting. So how did it come to this?

Israel’s “greatest friend”

In the year leading up to the war, the pair were tight. 

In February 2025, Netanyahu was the first foreign leader Mr. Trump welcomed to the White House during his second term. 

Iran war strains relationship between Trump and Netanyahu

President Trump meets with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, Feb. 4, 2025.

ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP/Getty


Bibi — a longtime nickname for Netanyahu that Trump uses often — called his American counterpart “the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House.” He praised Mr. Trump for moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and for pulling the U.S. out of the Iran nuclear deal brokered by former President Barack Obama.

That October, Mr. Trump received several standing ovations as he addressed Israel’s parliament during a visit to Jerusalem. 

He called Netanyahu “one of the greatest wartime presidents,” but he threw in: “He’s not the easiest guy to deal with, but that’s what makes him great.”

They remained largely in praise of one another until Feb. 28 this year, when the U.S. and Israel launched their joint strikes on Iran, killing the country’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and sparking an all-out war.

“On occasion, he’ll do something”

The leaders seemed to remain in lockstep after the war began. But in mid-March, an Israeli strike on Iran’s South Pars, part of the world’s largest natural gas field, brought an early sign of discord as it sent energy prices skyrocketing. 

Asked whether he had spoken with Netanyahu about the strikes, Mr. Trump said: “I did. I told him, don’t do that, and he won’t do that.”

“We get along great. It’s coordinated, but on occasion, he’ll do something, and if I don’t like it … and so we’re not doing that anymore,” he said.

Netanyahu said Israel had “acted alone,” and he denied claims that Israel had dragged the U.S. into the war. 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio had told lawmakers not long before that, “we knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties.”

“Does anyone really think that someone can tell President Trump what to do? Come on,” Netanyahu said after the South Pars strikes.

AUSTRALIA-IRAN-US-ISRAEL-WAR-PROTEST

A member of the Iranian community in Australia holds a placard in support of President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a rally amid joint U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran, in Sydney, March 14, 2026.

Saeed KHAN/AFP/Getty


In early April, the Trump administration sounded triumphant as Pakistan brokered a two-week truce between the U.S. and Iran, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth saying “Iran begged for this ceasefire.” 

Israel quickly said the agreement “does not include Lebanon,” and it pummeled the country’s south, killing hundreds of people in widespread strikes.

U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff reportedly told Netanyahu to “calm down” and open negotiations with Lebanon, which he did. But Israeli officials said a ceasefire with Hezbollah was out of the question.

“He’ll do whatever I want”

On May 20, with indirect U.S.-Iran talks yielding little as Israel and Hezbollah’s parallel war raged, Mr. Trump and Netanyahu had a “lengthy and dramatic” conversation, according to Israel’s Channel 12.

When asked hours later what he said to Netanyahu, Mr. Trump replied: “He’s fine, he’ll do whatever I want him to do.”

But 12 days later, as an agreement between the U.S. and Iran appeared imminent, Netanyahu ordered strikes on Hezbollah in southern Beirut, and Iran threatened to walk away from negotiations altogether.

“You’re f*****g crazy,” Mr. Trump blared over the phone, a U.S. official told Axios. “You’d be in prison if it weren’t for me. I’m saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.”

“What the f*** are you doing?” he yelled, according to another source. The White House never denied the remarks.

Netanyahu said afterward that he had told Mr. Trump Israel would attack Beirut if Hezbollah didn’t stop attacking Israel. 

Mr. Trump later dismissed the incident as the kind of “tactical disagreements” typical in a family.

Aftermath of an Israeli strike on the southern suburbs of Beirut

Emergency personnel work at the site of an Israeli strike on the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, June 7, 2026.

Mohamed Azakir/REUTERS


But on June 7, the president told Fox News he was “not happy” about further Israeli strikes on Beirut, which triggered an Iranian attack on Israel, again jeopardizing ceasefire talks.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Mr. Trump said Netanyahu “won’t have any choice” but to accept a U.S.-Iran agreement. 

“I call all the shots,” Mr. Trump said. “He [Netanyahu] doesn’t call the shots.” 

Israel struck Iran again, but on June 8, Netanyahu announced a halt in operations, adding that Israel maintained the right to defend itself against any attack.

“I say this, with appreciation and respect, in my good conversations with my friend, President Trump,” the Israeli leader said.

“The very small partner”

Mr. Trump’s announcement on Sunday of an agreement with Iran caught Netanyahu by surprise, according to Axios. Some of the Israeli leader’s media allies started attacking the U.S. president, with one TV host calling Mr. Trump a “loser.

“With an agreement, without an agreement — Iran will not have nuclear weapons,” Netanyahu declared Tuesday on X. “As long as I am Prime Minister of Israel — this will not happen.”

At the G7 summit in France this week, Mr. Trump said Netanyahu “gets a little excited sometimes. But we have an amazing partnership. We are the big partner and he is the very small partner.”

“Without me, there would be no Israel,” Mr. Trump said. “Israel would have been blown up a long time ago had I not gotten involved.”

Netanyahu’s dilemma

Netanyahu is now in a bind, The Economist’s Pfeffer told WTX US News, “because his political capital is invested in two things: One is this conflict with Iran, which he’s been talking up for so many years, and the other is his incredible relationship with Donald Trump that he’s been talking up ever since Donald Trump became president in 2016. And now he seems to be losing both of these, and he is stuck.”

Pfeffer was doubtful, however, that Mr. Trump would seek to materially punish the Israeli leader.

“We’ve seen Trump swearing at Bibi and then the next day saying, ‘Oh, he’s a wonderful prime minister,'” he said.

Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who served six U.S. secretaries of state as an adviser on Arab-Israeli negotiations, agreed.

“Is Trump frustrated with Netanyahu? Yes. He has said things publicly that no other American president has ever said about an Israeli prime minister,” he told WTX US News Wednesday. “The question is how is the president making these divisions real?”

The U.S. has not delayed military assistance, stopped intelligence sharing or stopped defending Israel as a veto-wielding member of the United Nations Security Council, he noted, adding that those options still seemed “completely off the table.”

“What Trump can do to punish Netanyahu is to deny him what needs most” ahead of October’s Israeli elections, Miller said. That, he said, would be saying the U.S.-Israel relationship is “suffering, not because of me, Donald Trump, but because of Benjamin Netanyahu.”

Miller added that, in his view, however, “Donald Trump does not want a major rupture with Netanyahu.”

“A little dispute”

Much now likely depends on Lebanon. The U.S.-Iran agreement signed by Mr. Trump includes a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, but Israel has insisted it will not withdraw from the neighboring country unless and until the Hezbollah threat is completely removed. 

While diplomats said Friday that Israel and Hezbollah had agreed to a new ceasefire, it came after a night of intense clashes that Lebanese officials say left 18 civilians dead, while Israel said four soldiers were killed.

And the next phase in the U.S.-Iran deal, direct talks that had been scheduled to start Friday in Switzerland, have been put on hold.

“We have a little dispute over Lebanon,” Mr. Trump told reporters in France on Wednesday. “I’m not happy with the way Israel has handled themselves.”

The question is whether Mr. Trump “is prepared to impose a cost or consequence on this Israeli prime minister” if the fighting in Lebanon continues holding up his bid to end the war with Iran, said Miller.

“If Trump feels he’s being ‘played’ by the Iranians,” however, with Tehran declining to restrain its Hezbollah allies, then “Netanyahu’s room for maneuver will increase,” noted Miller. 

And Bibi may be banking on it.

“Netanyahu is looking for any justification to somehow undermine this memorandum of understanding and the negotiations that will follow,” Miller told WTX US News.

Giorgia Meloni accuses Donald Trump of fabricating claim about photo request

Get you up to speed: Giorgia Meloni says Donald Trump ‘made up’ claim she begged him for a photo | News World

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has accused former US President Donald Trump of fabricating a story in which he claimed she “begged” for a photo with him at a G7 summit. The incident, which took place in France, has led Meloni to criticise Trump for showing more respect to enemies of the West than to established allies.

The exchange between Giorgia Meloni and Donald Trump arises from comments made by Trump regarding their interaction at the G7 summit in France. Meloni, who was previously a close ally of Trump, expressed her astonishment at his remarks and highlighted the disappointment in what she perceives as his preferential treatment towards adversaries of the West.

Giorgia Meloni has expressed her astonishment at Donald Trump’s claims, stating they are “completely made up” and criticising him for demonstrating greater respect towards enemies of the West than established allies. Following this public spat, it remains unclear how Trump will respond, though the discord highlights the ongoing tensions between their respective administrations.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how this latest dispute may affect Meloni’s political relationship with Trump moving forward.

Giorgia Meloni accuses Donald Trump of fabricating claim about photo request

109467247 0 image m 13 1781873287207
Meloni has hit out at former ally Trump over ‘completely made up’ claim in an Instagram post (Picture: Instagram)

Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni furiously accused Donald Trump of telling a ‘completely made up’ story about her – before hitting out at the US president for pandering to enemies of the West.

Trump told an Italian TV channel that Meloni had ‘begged’ him to take a photo with her at a G7 summit, a claim angrily denied by the Italian leader.

Video from the event in France showed Meloni and Trump deep in conversation, but the US leader suggested he had merely indulged her by chatting with her.

‘She’s probably happy I talked to her. I didn’t have to talk to her,’ Trump was quoted as saying by La7 TV channel.

SEI 273957843 a44cKeir Starmer next to French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Finland’s President Alexander Stubb and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz as they walk during a meeting, amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy (not pictured), at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. Ukrainian Presidential Press Service/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo” decoding=”async” loading=”lazy”/>
Donald Trump talks with Keir Starmer last year as Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni looks on(Picture: Reuters)

‘She begged me to take a picture with her. She wanted a picture with me so badly. I wouldn’t have taken it, but I felt sorry for her.’

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Meloni said she was ‘astonished’ by his comments and accused Trump of paying greater respect to enemies of the West than established allies.

She said: ‘Donald Trump’s statements are completely made up. I am frankly astonished. I don’t know why the president of the United States behaves like this towards his allies: it is not the first time, moreover.

‘I can only say it is disappointing that he does not show the same determination with the enemies of the West and of the United States, whose leaders he instead treats with far greater indulgence. There is one thing he should remember: neither I nor Italy ever beg.’

Donald Trump - Pope Truth Social post
Donald Trump was criticised by Meloni after posting bizarre image amid spat with Pope (Picture: Truth Social)

Meloni was once a close ally of Trump and the only European leader to attend his inauguration in 2025.

However, they fell out after she backed the Pope Leo when Trump lashed out at the Pontiff over his condemnation of the Iran war.

Trump was also angered by Meloni’s unwillingness to back the Middle East conflict, accusing her of ‘lacking courage’.

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

EU leaders agree to draft €2 trillion budget deal by October 2023

EU leaders agree to draft €2 trillion budget deal by October 2023

Budget Agreement
EU leaders have agreed to produce a preliminary deal on the €2 trillion EU long-term budget for 2028–2034 by October, according to a draft statement.
Budget Scale
The €2 trillion EU budget for 2028–2034 underlines the bloc’s commitment to substantial funding amid diverse interests, with potential cuts impacting agriculture and defence spending.
EU Budget Response
“An ambitious and balanced package on new own resources by the October European Council is critical,” emphasised European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during a recent press conference.

EU leaders aim for October draft deal on €2 trillion budget

696x392 cmsv2 c2924670 e28f 55b2 9578 e10662e63998 9805577

EU leaders meeting in Brussels have agreed to produce a preliminary deal on the €2 trillion EU long-term budget for 2028–2034 by October, according to a draft statement published on Friday.

In a gathering on Thursday and Friday, the bloc entered a sensitive phase of the negotiations, trying to reach a common understanding on expenditure and revenues to fund the priorities of the next seven years.

There is a delicate balancing act to be struck among EU member states. While a group of net payers led by Germany and The Netherlands pushing to slash the bloc’s total spend, southern and eastern European member states are concerned that funding for sectors such as agriculture will be sacrificed in favour of more defence spending.

In a press conference on Friday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa called on the bloc to reach an agreement, particularly on the financing aspect, by the end of the year.

The budget was proposed by the European Commission in July 2025. EU leaders have now asked the incoming Irish presidency, which will chair the discussions among member states from 1 July, to propose a new negotiating text in October, an EU official said – referring to a document covering expenditure and revenues, known as “own resources”.

“An ambitious and balanced package on new own resources by the October European Council” is also expected, another EU official said.

The two main camps

Despite negotiations being complex and dynamic, there are mainly two groups of countries putting forward proposals: the “Friends of Cohesion” and the “Frugals”.

In late May, the Friends of Cohesion signed a document calling for an increase in agricultural and regional funding. The signatories were Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal, the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Spain and Hungary.

The “frugal” countries – Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Austria – said any increase in spending would be a no-go.

In a revised text presented last week, the Cypriot authorities, currently chairing the talks among the member states, pitched a cut of €32.8 billion to the overall €2 trillion budget, describing it as a compromise between the two camps.

The European Parliament, a co-legislator which will have to approve the budget alongside leaders, has rejected the Cypriot proposal, describing it as insufficient, particularly with regard to agriculture and regional funding.

Budget revenues and rolling debt

The debate over how the budget will be financed remains unresolved, and a draft agreement is expected by October.

In its initial proposal, the European Commission included revenue streams from the Emissions Trading System, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, non-collected e-waste, tobacco excise duties and a corporate tax.

During the negotiations, the European Parliament proposed additional sources of revenue. According to several EU diplomats who spoke to EU News on condition of anonymity, the proposals that have attracted the greatest interest among leaders include a gambling tax, a digital levy and a tax on crypto assets.

The frugal countries remain hesitant about the proposed revenue measures, particularly Sweden, which is against any kind of own resources. They argue that a move in that direction would oblige the EU’s wealthiest member states to shoulder a disproportionate financial burden.

Countries including Italy, France and Greece have proposed repaying NextGenerationEU recovery funds through the reissuance of debt, a mechanism known as “rolling debt”. The proposal is strongly opposed by Germany, the Netherlands and others, who reject any form of new common borrowing.

According to two EU diplomats familiar with the negotiations, the debate on rolling debt will depend on the kind of agreement leaders reach on own resources.

The bloc is aiming to reach an agreement on the budget by the end of 2026. The co-legislators are keen to avoid extending negotiations into 2027, a major election year in several key European countries, including France, Italy and Poland.

Any agreement on the budget will require unanimous support from all 27 member states, as well as the consent of the European Parliament.

LIVE German 2025 Election