Latest News
- ICE agent shoots man in car with child present in New York, says mayor
- Montreal to provide 3,000 emergency shelter spots for the unhoused
- Pentagon confirms livestream of Nidal Hasan’s execution on December 3
- City council meeting in Iowa disrupted following Satanic prayer delivery
- Royal family member challenges legality of criminal proceedings in UK
- Evicted 87-year-old woman Maricarmen Abascal dies in Spain
- Maresca says Manchester City players focused on Liverpool match despite charges
- Polar bear cub at Winnipeg zoo ready for visitors as naming poll opens
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
ICE agent shoots man in car with child present in New York, says mayor
4:00 am
Get you up to speed: ICE agent shoots man in car with five-year-old child in New York: Mayor
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot a man in his car in the Marble Hill neighbourhood of New York City, while a five-year-old child was also present but unharmed. The man is conscious and receiving medical treatment, with the Department of Homeland Security stating that the incident is under investigation.
The Department of Homeland Security reported that the targeted enforcement operation occurred at approximately 4pm in the Bronx. The incident is currently under investigation by local authorities, and the injured man is receiving medical treatment while remaining conscious.
Mayor Zohran Mamdani has called for an end to all ICE enforcement actions in New York City following the shooting incident, labelling it an “unconscionable” situation. The Department of Homeland Security confirmed the incident remains under investigation as protests continue to grow in response to ICE’s actions.
What remains unclear — The specific circumstances that led to the shooting by the ICE agent are not fully detailed.
ICE agent shoots man in car with child present in New York, says mayor
News|Civil RightsICE agent shoots man in car with five-year-old child in New York: Mayor
Mayor Zohran Mamdani says agents fired at a car with a child inside; DHS says the man was an arrest target.
Published On 9 Oct 20269 Oct 2026
Published On 9 Oct 20269 Oct 2026An Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent has shot a man in the Marble Hill neighbourhood of New York City, Mayor Zohran Mamdani said, calling the incident an “unconscionable and incredibly serious situation”.
In a statement he published on X, Mamdani said early reports on Thursday indicated agents surrounded the man and a five-year-old child in his car before firing multiple rounds.
The child was believed to be physically unharmed, he added.
Mamdani said he had called President Donald Trump and would demand that he end all ICE enforcement actions in the city. “I will not stand by while ICE agents terrorize our communities,” he said.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said ICE officers were conducting a “targeted enforcement operation” in the Bronx at about 4pm to arrest a man it described as a Dominican national with a criminal conviction.
It said an officer “discharged his weapon” and the man was injured.
DHS said the incident remains under investigation.
According to a statement by the New York Police Department, the man remains conscious and is receiving medical treatment at a nearby hospital.
Protesters march from the scene of the shooting to a nearby hospital after an ICE officer shot a man in New York City on October 8, 2026 [Sarah Yenesel/EPA]
ICE under scrutiny
The shooting comes after months of mounting criticism of the agency.
In January, federal immigration agents shot dead two US citizens in Minneapolis: Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, killed by an ICE agent on January 7, and Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse, shot by a US border agent.
After Good’s killing, Trump officials labelled her a “domestic terrorist” even as video of the shooting cast doubt on claims she had tried to run over an agent.
The federal government removed local authorities from the investigation, rejected calls for a civil rights probe, and sent hundreds more agents to Minnesota, bringing the total to 3,000, as protests spread to hundreds of US cities.
Trump blamed the shift in American opinion about the immigration agency on unfair media coverage, urging DHS and ICE to publicise the “violent criminals” they arrest.
ICE has been tasked with a target of one million deportations a year.
The agency doubled in size to more than 22,000 agents by January and is now the highest-funded federal law enforcement agency, with about $75bn allocated to it over four years under a tax bill Trump signed last year.
Protesters scuffle with police near the scene of the shooting of a man by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in New York on October 8, 2026 [Seth Wenig/AP Photo]
Montreal to provide 3,000 emergency shelter spots for the unhoused
2:00 am
Get you up to speed: Montreal mayor says city will offer 3,000 spots in emergency shelters for unhoused
Homelessness has been declared the biggest humanitarian crisis in the city, according to the mayor. The situation has prompted immediate concern among local officials and the community.
The city has established a task force to address homelessness and is expected to release a report detailing recommendations by the end of the month. Local officials continue to investigate potential funding sources to support new housing initiatives.
The mayor has declared that homelessness represents the “biggest humanitarian crisis” in the city. In response, officials are expected to implement new measures aimed at addressing the escalating issue in the coming weeks.
What remains unclear — The mayor has not specified what measures will be taken to address homelessness.
Montreal to provide 3,000 emergency shelter spots for the unhoused
The mayor says homelessness is the biggest humanitarian crisis the city is facing.
Pentagon confirms livestream of Nidal Hasan’s execution on December 3
12:00 am
Get you up to speed: Fort Hood shooter’s execution will be livestreamed, Pentagon says
Nidal Hasan, a former Army major convicted of killing 13 people in 2009 at Fort Hood, is scheduled to be executed by firing squad on December 3 at 1 p.m. The execution will be livestreamed to the public following approval from the Trump administration and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.
The execution of Nidal Hasan is scheduled for December 3 at 1 p.m. at Fort Hood, marking a potential landmark as it would be the first execution of an American service member by the military since 1961. Hasan’s lengthy appeals process culminated in a request for the Supreme Court to review his case, which the court declined last year.
The Pentagon has confirmed that Nidal Hasan’s execution will be livestreamed on December 3, a decision Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth claims is intended to illustrate the consequences of serious crimes. Meanwhile, Texas Tech University law professor Geoffrey Corn has expressed concern about the ethical implications, stating that the plan “raises significant moral questions” and risks turning the execution into a “public spectacle.”
What remains unclear — It is not specified how the public will be able to access the livestream of Hasan’s execution.
Pentagon confirms livestream of Nidal Hasan’s execution on December 3
The U.S. military plans to livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan, the ex-Army major who was convicted of the 2009 killing of 13 people at Fort Hood, when he faces a firing squad on Dec. 3, a Pentagon official said.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier Thursday the Pentagon planned to make the execution public.
“He’s gonna get a firing squad of soldiers, as it should be,” Hegseth told Jack Posobiec on Real America’s Voice. “We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it’s public — because people need to understand that there’s serious consequences for these types of things.”
Hegseth said the early December execution will take place at Fort Hood at 1 p.m.
Earlier this week, the Trump administration approved the plan to execute Hasan. Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said on social media the plan to use an Army firing squad was recommended by Hegseth and approved by President Trump.
While executions are sometimes witnessed by small groups of people, including reporters and victims’ family members, it is virtually unheard-of in recent history for an execution in the United States to be viewable by the general public.
The last public execution in the U.S. appeared to take place in 1936, when Rainey Bethea was hanged for rape in Kentucky, reportedly drawing a crowd of around 20,000.
Geoffrey Corn, a Texas Tech University law professor who served in the Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Corps, told WTX US News the plan to livestream the execution “raises significant moral questions, above and beyond the questions related to the death penalty generally.”
“There’s a certain protocol that is normally followed with executions limiting the gallery of observers, which usually includes people close to the victims and certain members of the media,” he said. “I think it’s an acknowledgment of the gravity of the penalty to be imposed.”
He added: “In short, turning the execution of such a penalty into some type of public spectacle echoes of the past we seem to have put behind us.”
WTX US News has reached out to Hasan’s attorney for comment.
A former Army psychiatrist, Hasan was convicted of murdering 13 people and injuring more than 30 in a 2013 court-martial. Hasan acknowledged at trial that he was responsible for the shooting, claiming he opened fire on fellow members of the Army in an attempt to protect Islamic insurgents from U.S. military forces. He was sentenced to death.
Hasan’s case could mark the military’s first execution of an American service member since 1961, when a soldier was hanged for raping and attempting to murder an 11-year-old girl.
It would also mark a rare use of a firing squad. Hegseth said “it hasn’t been since World War II since we’ve done that,” pointing to the military’s 1945 execution of Pvt. Eddie Slovik for desertion.
In state civilian court, the execution method was used in South Carolina three times last year, marking the country’s first firing squads since 2010. The federal government typically uses lethal injection in civilian death penalty cases, though the Justice Department said earlier this year that officials should consider other methods, including firing squads and electrocution.
The decision by Hegseth comes after a lengthy appeals process for Hasan. He chose to represent himself at trial, and in an unusual course of events, he clashed with his own court-appointed standby attorneys, who worried that Hasan was intentionally seeking the death penalty.
Hasan asked the Supreme Court to review his case in 2024, arguing the judge had violated his right to a public trial by clearing the public from the courtroom before discussing some of his issues with the attorneys. The high court declined to take up the issue last year.
City council meeting in Iowa disrupted following Satanic prayer delivery
11:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Hell breaks loose at council after Satanic prayer read | News World
A city council meeting in Ottumwa, Iowa, escalated into chaos when former councillor Matt Dalbey recited a Satanic prayer from the podium, declaring, “Hail Satan.” The incident prompted immediate outrage from attendees, with Pastor Rick Bick demanding the council “reverse this curse that was put on our city.”
The Ottumwa City Council’s policy approved in January allows for prayers or statements from any faith or philosophy to open meetings, a decision that has now raised concerns among council members. Council member Cara Galloway, the only councillor to vote against the policy, expressed that it could invite further controversial invocations, reflecting the broader implications of including diverse beliefs in municipal gatherings.
Mayor Benjamin Foote called for 30 seconds of silence following the prayer, prompting council member Cara Galloway to voice her concerns about a January policy allowing diverse invocations at meetings. Galloway, who opposed the policy, warned that it could lead to similar controversies and stated, “we need to remember that we are up here to be neutral.”
What remains unclear — It is unclear what actions the city council will take in response to the controversy surrounding prayer policies.
City council meeting in Iowa disrupted following Satanic prayer delivery
A US city council meeting descended into chaos after an attendee delivered a Satanic prayer from the podium.
Matt Dalbey, a former member of Ottumwa City Council in Iowa, opened up the meeting by addressing the ‘dark father’ and declaring: ‘Hail Satan.’
He then went on to call for people to embrace the ‘Luciferian impulse’ and said individuals should be judged on their actions rather than social conventions.
The unusual speech prompted outrage from the people in the room, who looked stunned as they turned towards the American flag and recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
Pastor Rick Bick from the New Life Center instantly headed for the podum after Dalbey’s address and demanded that the council ‘reverse this curse that was put on our city’.
‘That “Hail Satan” is not welcome here,’ Bick said. ‘It needs to be done now… that was a curse put on the city. Most of you know that, and we need to just stop and reverse it.’
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Former councillor Matt Dalbey read a satanic prayer at the start of the Ottumwa City Council meeting in Iowa (Picture: Ottumwa City Council)
Mayor Benjamin Foote then called for 30 seconds of silence ‘to reflect on whatever it is we need to reflect on at this time’.
The meeting eventually continued, but council member Cara Galloway then raised concerns concerns about a policy approved in January which allows prayers or statements from any faith or philosophy to be used to open meetings.
Galloway, who was the only councillor to vote against the policy, said she had warned that it could lead to exactly the sort of controversy that unfolded.
‘I think we’ve opened ourselves up for others to object or respond to others’ invocations, and we need to remember that we are up here to be neutral,’ she said.
‘I think I specifically referenced that having someone from the church of Satan or a prayer about Satan when we talked about that, that this could happen and we would need to allow it.’
Dalbey later defended his decision, saying he is a member of the Satanic Temple of Iowa, which describes itself as non-theistic and does not worship a literal Satan or Lucifer.
Instead, it promotes ideas including individual freedom, personal autonomy and challenging arbitrary authority.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Royal family member challenges legality of criminal proceedings in UK
10:00 pm
Royal family member challenges legality of criminal proceedings in UK
Royal legal challenge
It marks the first instance since 1649 that a member of the royal family has contested the legality of criminal proceedings.
It marks the first instance since 1649 that a member of the royal family has contested the legality of criminal proceedings.
Royal Precedent
This challenge marks a significant institutional moment, potentially reshaping the legal landscape regarding the accountability of royal family members in the UK.
This challenge marks a significant institutional moment, potentially reshaping the legal landscape regarding the accountability of royal family members in the UK.
Royal Challenge
“This unprecedented move signifies a pivotal moment in our legal history,” remarked a constitutional expert regarding the royal family’s legal challenge.
“This unprecedented move signifies a pivotal moment in our legal history,” remarked a constitutional expert regarding the royal family’s legal challenge.
Ex-prince Andrew warrants ruled 'unlawful' as police investigation continues
According to British media reports, it is the first time a member of the royal family has challenged the legality of criminal proceedings since the trial of Charles I in 1649.
Evicted 87-year-old woman Maricarmen Abascal dies in Spain
9:01 pm
Media Lens: Evicted 87-year-old woman Maricarmen Abascal dies in Spain
Maricarmen Abascal, an 87-year-old woman from Spain, died following her eviction that sparked nationwide protests. Her eviction and subsequent death drew significant attention to housing issues in the country.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
Maricarmen Abascal, an 87-year-old woman, passed away following her eviction from her home in Spain, which had sparked nationwide protests over housing issues. Abascal’s eviction drew significant public attention and outrage, highlighting the struggles faced by elderly and vulnerable renters in Spain’s housing market.
Abascal’s situation resonated with many, leading to a series of protests that sought to address the broader issue of affordable housing in Spain. Her death has intensified discussions around housing policies and the treatment of elderly tenants in the country.
Status quo
Maricarmen Abascal, an 87-year-old woman from Spain, recently passed away following her eviction from her home. Her eviction garnered significant public attention and sparked nationwide protests over housing issues in Spain. This situation highlighted ongoing concerns regarding housing insecurity and the treatment of vulnerable populations in the country. Abascal’s case resonated with many, leading to widespread demonstrations demanding changes in housing policies.
Confirmed facts
- Maricarmen Abascal, an 87-year-old woman, was evicted from her home in Spain.
- Her eviction led to nationwide protests in Spain.
- Maricarmen Abascal passed away following her eviction.
- Her death has sparked discussions about housing rights and social justice in Spain.
Preconceptions
- Democracy Now! emphasizes the personal story of Maricarmen Abascal, highlighting her eviction and the subsequent protests it sparked, positioning her death as a catalyst for broader housing issues in Spain.
- The Wall Street Journal reduces the personal narrative and instead focuses on the political implications of her death, emphasizing the grief and political movements that arose as a result, rather than detailing Abascal’s individual circumstances.
- NBC News prioritizes the immediate facts surrounding her eviction and death, highlighting the public reaction, but directs less emphasis on the personal emotional aspects compared to Democracy Now!
- The New York Times combines both the personal and political aspects, presenting her story within the context of widespread societal issues related to housing, while still retaining a focus on Maricarmen’s individual struggle.
- Overall, the coverage diverges in how much they prioritize her personal narrative versus the broader social implications of her eviction and death.
Elisions
- Democracy Now! emphasizes the emotional aspect and societal impact of Maricarmen Abascal’s death alongside a narrative on her eviction, while The Wall Street Journal focuses more on the political implications and public response in Spain following her death, highlighting differing narrative angles.
- While NBC News discusses the circumstances of Maricarmen’s eviction and her age, The New York Times elaborates on the historical context of housing protests in Spain, showing a gap in historical framing of the event across sources.
- The Wall Street Journal presents substantial commentary from political figures in response to Maricarmen’s eviction, which is less prominent in the coverage from Democracy Now! that primarily recounts her story and the resulting public reactions, indicating variance in sourcing political responses.
One story, four angles
Democracy Now! – “She Put Her Body on the Line”: Maricarmen, 87, Dies; Her Eviction Sparked Spain Housing Protests
Publication: Democracy Now! | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The focus is on Maricarmen’s active role in protests, framing her eviction as a catalyst for a larger housing crisis narrative in Spain.
Key differences:
1. **Comparative Approach**: Democracy Now! positions Maricarmen’s death as a pivotal protest moment, emphasizing her personal struggle, while WSJ highlights the broader political implications, saying “In Spain, Grief and Politics Mix.”
2. **Emotional Appeal**: The phrase “Put Her Body on the Line” evoked from Democracy Now! directly appeals to readers’ emotions, contrasting with NBC’s more detached phrasing in “sparked nationwide protests.”
3. **Contextualization**: The outlet provides extensive context on social movements and grassroots efforts, unlike WSJ, which less elaborates on public response to eviction protests.
Bias: Selection: Focuses on emotional resonance and activism | Language: Use of evocative language enhances empathy | Omission: Lacks any opposing viewpoint regarding housing policies.
Assessment: Readers are led to view Maricarmen as a symbol of resistance against systemic injustices in housing.
WSJ – In Spain, Grief and Politics Mix After Death of Evicted Woman
Publication: WSJ | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article leads with a somber reflection on Maricarmen’s situation while investigating the political aftershocks of her death, suggesting an intersection of personal tragedy and broader governmental accountability.
Key differences:
1. **Focus Comparison**: WSJ emphasizes the reactions of political figures in the aftermath of Maricarmen’s death, contrasting with Democracy Now!’s focus on her personal activism leading to protest mobilization.
2. **Language Tone**: WSJ’s phrasing, “Grief and Politics Mix,” portrays a cultured gravity, while Democracy Now! employs more dynamic narrative styles like “Put Her Body on the Line”, capturing a sense of urgency.
3. **Style of Reporting**: WSJ notes public mourning and political figures’ statements without centered narratives on individual and collective action, which is a significant aspect in Democracy Now!’s report.
Bias: Selection: Highlights political ramifications over grassroots movements | Language: More formal, less emotive language used | Omission: Lacks input from protestor perspectives, focusing instead on political commentary.
Assessment: Readers perceive the narrative as a complex interplay between individual grief and political implications.
NBC News – The 87-year-old woman whose eviction sparked nationwide protests in Spain dies
Publication: NBC News | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: NBC highlights Maricarmen’s background and the circumstances surrounding her eviction, drawing attention to societal reactions but not as deeply into protest context.
Key differences:
1. **Narrative Concentration**: NBC’s approach is more descriptive about Maricarmen’s identity and personal story rather than framing her as a protest icon, as seen in Democracy Now!’s focus on activism.
2. **Language Variation**: Uses the phrasing “sparked nationwide protests,” which sounds reactive, unlike Democracy Now!’s proactive “put her body on the line,” which calls for agency and action.
3. **Framing Scope**: NBC explores immediate societal implications of Maricarmen’s death but does not emphasize the historical significance of protests conveyed significantly in WSJ.
Bias: Selection: Centers individual versus collective protest focus | Language: Descriptive but lacks urgency | Omission: Neglects broader social movement context surrounding evictions over time.
Assessment: Readers are informed of the personal tragedy but are less engaged with broader systemic messages.
The New York Times – ‘Maricarmen,’ Whose Eviction Enraged Spaniards, Dies at 87
Publication: The New York Times | Intensity: (5/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The article begins with Maricarmen’s background and the emotional tone surrounding her death, emphasizing the outrage over her eviction.
Key differences:
1. **Emphasis Shift**: The focus on “enraged Spaniards” indicates a societal outrage context compared to Democracy Now! which portrays her as a martyr for activism.
2. **Descriptive Language**: Descriptors like “enraged” articulate a strong public sentiment, contrasting with WSJ’s more political analysis nature and ANC’s personal narratives.
3. **Depth of Coverage**: The New York Times tends to summarize rather than analyze the prevailing social movements sparked by her eviction, which is more prominent in Democracy Now! and reflected in WSJ.
Bias: Selection: Emphasizes public emotions without detailing protest actions | Language: Less active and revolutionary tone | Omission: Does not explore long-term social policies on housing related to the incident.
Assessment: Readers recognize a profound public emotional response but may not connect to actionable outcomes.
Democracy Now! frames Maricarmen Abascal’s eviction and subsequent death as a spark for social protest, emphasizing her personal narrative intertwined with calls for justice. In contrast, the WSJ presents the incident in a more political context, discussing the implications for Spanish politics, which can escalate tensions. NBC News maintains a neutral tone, focusing mainly on the event itself and its national ramifications. The New York Times highlights public outrage, labeling her eviction as a catalyst for widespread anger. Thus, Democracy Now! offers the strongest advocacy, while WSJ’s framing risks escalating an already charged situation.
The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
Democracy Now!
“She Put Her Body on the Line”: Maricarmen, 87, Dies; Her Eviction Sparked Spain Housing Protests
WSJ
In Spain, Grief and Politics Mix After Death of Evicted Woman
NBC News
The 87-year-old woman whose eviction sparked nationwide protests in Spain dies
The New York Times
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.