LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

One hundred and five MEPs urge European Commission to fund abortion access

Get you up to speed: One hundred and five MEPs urge European Commission to fund abortion access

EFFECTIVE ABORTION ACCESS
One hundred and five MEPs urged European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to establish a European fund for safe abortion access across member states.

EU INITIATIVE
One hundred five MEPs urged Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to create a financial mechanism for safe abortion access, estimating costs between three and seven million euros annually.

EU INITIATIVE
The European Commission is expected to announce its decision regarding the “My Voice, My Choice” initiative on Thursday, 26 February 2026.

What we know so far

Published on

One hundred and five Members of the European Parliament sent a letter on Wednesday to the Commission’s President Ursula von der Leyen, asking for a European-funded pathway that ensures real and effective access to abortions.

The letter aims to put pressure on the Commission, the day before the decision on the European Citizens’ Initiative “My Voice, My Choice”, which collected 1,124,513 signatures across all 27 countries and asked to improve access to safe abortion in Europe.

This initiative calls to establish financial support to perform safe termination of pregnancies for women abroad their countries, claiming that the lack of access to abortion in some EU member states puts women at risk of physical harm and mental stress and leads them to seek unsafe abortions.

EU institutions are obliged to assess any initiative that gets the support of at least 1 million people across at least seven EU countries.

The European Commission has a timeframe to either set out legislative measures or provide justification for not doing so, and its answer is expected on Thursday.

The European Parliament has the obligation to discuss the initiative, and so did last year, leading to a non-binding resolution approved last December, which calls for an EU fund to help women without access to safe and legal abortion in their countries.

The Parliament’s text envisages a solidarity mechanism enabling EU states to provide access to the termination of pregnancies for any woman who is legally barred from doing so in her home country.

Some of the MEPs who supported the resolution now want the Commission to act. The letter was signed mostly by lawmakers from Socialists and Democrats (S&D), Greens/EFA, and The Left groups, with a few from Renew Europe and one European People’s Party member joining the call.

“We want the Commission to establish a financial mechanism that allows women to have the same treatment, regardless of which country they are coming from,” Slovenian S&D MEP Matjaž Nemec, who promoted the letter, told EU News.

His office estimates that an amount between three and seven million euros per year would be enough to set up this fund, which would cover the costs for EU countries’ medical systems to perform abortions for European women living in other countries.

“The inequalities between Member States continue to create unjust differences and expose individuals to unsafe and discriminatory conditions,” reads the letter. Signing MEPs also say that they are “ready to examine further political and legal avenues” if the Commission does not meet the initiative supporters’ expectations.

Other MEPs do not agree with this push. The Spanish far-right party Vox also sent a letter to von der Leyen and EU Commissioner for Equality Hadja Lahbib, asking them to refrain from “financing cross-border abortions with public money” and calling the European Citizens’ Initiative “politically influenced”.

According to the European Abortion Policies Atlas 2025, several EU countries have taken steps to guarantee the right to safe abortions, while others have recorded new restrictions, increased harassment of abortion providers, and the spread of disinformation on the topic.

Cuban Troops Clash with Florida Speedboat, Leaving Four Dead

Media Lens: Cuban Troops Clash with Florida Speedboat, Leaving Four Dead

Story focus: Cuban troops kill 4 in speedboat confrontation.

Primary entity: Jacob Wendler

Region: Cuba

Cuban troops killed four people during a confrontation with a US-registered speedboat near Cuba. This incident has raised tensions between Cuba and Florida regarding maritime activities.

Quick links:
What has happened |
Confirmed details |
What remains unclear |
One story, four angles |
What’s missing |
Related links


What has happened

A confrontation occurred off the coast of Cuba, resulting in the deaths of four individuals on a speedboat registered in the United States. According to reports, Cuban border guards engaged in an exchange of fire with the boat, leading to the fatal incident. The speedboat’s occupants were reportedly trying to flee from Cuban authorities during a patrol operation.

Details surrounding the event remain limited, but both Cuban and U.S. officials are anticipated to investigate the circumstances leading to the confrontation. As the situation develops, reactions from both governments and the families of the deceased are expected to unfold in the coming days.

Confirmed details

  • Four individuals were shot dead by Cuban border guards in an incident involving a US-registered speedboat.
  • The confrontation occurred as the boat was attempting to leave Cuban waters.
  • Cuban authorities claim the boat was involved in illegal activity.
  • The event has escalated tensions between the US and Cuba regarding maritime enforcement and crossing issues.
  • The speedboat incident has attracted significant media attention and international scrutiny.
  • Reports of the incident surfaced from multiple news outlets shortly after it occurred.

What remains unclear

  • The exact events leading up to the confrontation between Cuban troops and the Florida speedboat are unclear.
  • The reasons behind the Cuban troops’ actions during the incident remain unspecified.
  • Details surrounding the identities and activities of the individuals on the speedboat have not been disclosed.
  • Different reports present varying accounts of whether any warnings were issued before the shooting.
  • The official response from Cuban authorities regarding the incident varies significantly between sources.
  • There is inconsistency regarding the number and nature of injuries sustained by individuals involved in the incident.

One story, four angles


Politico – Cuban troops kill 4 in confrontation with Florida speedboat

Publication: Politico | Primary framing pattern: Conflict | Tone register: Serious | Intensity level: Moderate (5/10) | Sentiment: -0.5 | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot:
The article focuses on a deadly incident involving Cuban troops and a Florida-registered vessel, highlighting tensions and conflict. It presents a straightforward overview without significant embellishments.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
The framing emphasizes the violent confrontation, suggesting high stakes and urgency in political tensions between Cuba and the U.S.

Bias:
Selection: Focuses on immediate violence rather than broader context.
Language: Emotionally charged terms like “kill” emphasize severity.
Omission: Lack of background on the historical context of U.S.-Cuba relations.

Assessment:
The article presents a critical incident while lacking deeper analysis of underlying causes.


BBC – Four shot dead on US-registered speedboat by border guards, Cuba says

Publication: BBC | Primary framing pattern: Violence | Tone register: Informative | Intensity level: Moderate (5/10) | Sentiment: -0.4 | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot:
The article details a fatal encounter involving a U.S. vessel, emphasizing Cuba’s claim of responsibility. This framing may suggest increased tensions in regional waters.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
The focus on fatalities highlights the event’s severity while framing Cuba’s actions provocatively.

Bias:
Selection: Highlights violence without discussing the vessel’s activities.
Language: Using “shot dead” stresses immediate violence.
Omission: Lacks a thorough investigation into broader political implications.

Assessment:
The report conveys critical information but does not fully address the historical context of U.S.-Cuban relations.


The New York Times – Live Updates: Cuban Border Guard Kills 4 on US-Registered Boat

Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: Ongoing incident | Tone register: Urgent | Intensity level: High (7/10) | Sentiment: -0.6 | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot:
This live update format emphasizes immediate developments concerning the fatal incident, creating a heightened sense of urgency and ongoing risk.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
By presenting the story in an ongoing format, there’s an implication of escalating tensions and a potential crisis atmosphere.

Bias:
Selection: Focused primarily on current events, downplaying past events.
Language: Urgent phrasing signals alarm.
Omission: Insufficient exploration of U.S. interests or historical grievances.

Assessment:
The live updates provide important context but lack a comprehensive historical analysis of relations.


Fox News – Cuban coast guard kills four in exchange of fire with US-registered boat

Publication: Fox News | Primary framing pattern: Confrontation | Tone register: Sensational | Intensity level: High (6/10) | Sentiment: -0.5 | Legal precision: Low

Expand

Espresso Shot:
The article highlights the violent encounter with emphasis on chaos and danger, potentially sensationalizing the event to draw attention.

Quote unavailable (paywall/limited preview).

Framing analysis:
The framing tends to amplify the dramatic aspects of the confrontation, creating a more sensational narrative.

Bias:
Selection: Prioritizes violence, undermining broader context.
Language: Use of dramatic language reinforces urgency.
Omission: Fails to explore diplomatic implications or underlying causes of tensions.

Assessment:
While engaging, the report lacks depth in analyzing the implications of such incidents.

What’s missing across coverage

  • Lack of background information on the historical context of Cuban-American relations, which may contribute to understanding the incident.
  • No comparative analysis with similar incidents involving military or coast guard actions in other countries.
  • Missing perspectives or reactions from local communities affected by the incident.
  • Insufficient details regarding the implications of this incident on US-Cuba diplomatic relations moving forward.

The coverage of the Cuba-Florida speedboat incident reveals distinct framing approaches among major news outlets. Politico emphasizes a legal perspective by stating that “Cuban troops kill 4 in confrontation,” framing the action as a state-sanctioned incident with implications for foreign relations. The BBC adopts a more neutral stance, focusing on the narrative that “four shot dead on US-registered speedboat by border guards,” which conveys a sense of ambiguity regarding accountability. In contrast, Fox News employs escalatory framing with “Cuban coast guard kills four in exchange of fire,” suggesting direct aggression that could fuel tensions. The New York Times also emphasizes immediate updates, signaling urgency while portraying the event as a violent escalation. This consequence-led framing may increase political pressure on lawmakers by providing critics with narratives to leverage against public policy. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.


Politico

Cuban troops kill 4 in confrontation with Florida speedboat

BBC

Four shot dead on US-registered speedboat by border guards, Cuba says

The New York Times

Live Updates: Cuban Border Guard Kills 4 on US-Registered Boat

Fox News

Cuban coast guard kills four in exchange of fire with US-registered boat

Is a Third Term Possible for Donald Trump?

Get you up to speed: Is a Third Term Possible for Donald Trump?

PRESIDENTIAL TERM LIMITS
Donald Trump has suggested the possibility of pursuing a third presidential term, although the Constitution prohibits such an action without amending the 22nd Amendment.

POLICY RESPONSE
Democratic congressman Daniel Goldman said, “This is yet another escalation in his clear effort to take over the government and dismantle our democracy.”

CURRENT STATUS
Donald Trump has hinted at a third term but lacks formal plans, with significant constitutional challenges noted by experts like Joseph Cosgrove.

What we know so far

Donald Trump is one of two presidents to serve two non-consecutive terms, second only to Grover Cleveland, who did it in the 1800s.

But Mr Trump has continually made comments hinting at a third term in office.

Is a Third Term Possible for Donald Trump?
Image: Pic: AP

An amendment to the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the United States, prohibits anyone from serving for more than two terms.

But what has the president said, how likely is he to pursue a third term in 2028 – and is it even possible?

What has Trump said?

He has repeatedly flirted with the idea of serving beyond his two terms, joking about it at rallies and even selling merchandise with “Trump 2028” branding.

In his lengthy state of the union address on Tuesday, Mr Trump suggested his current term “should be my third”.

It appeared to be a reference to his continued unproven claim that the 2020 election he lost to Joe Biden was stolen.

Donald Trump with Mark Stone
Image: Key takeaways from Trump’s ‘state of the union’ speech

On 27 October last year he told reporters he “would love to do it,” adding: “I have my best numbers ever.”

When pressed by a reporter on whether or not he would really pursue a third term, he remained cryptic.

“Am I not ruling it out? I mean you’ll have to tell me,” he said.

Is a Third Term Possible for Donald Trump?
Image: Pic: AP

The president had made similar comments about seeking a third term in an interview with Sky News’ US partner NBC News on 30 March 2025.

When asked about the possibility, he said: “A lot of people want me to do it. But, I mean, I basically tell them we have a long way to go, you know, it’s very early in the administration.

“I’m focused on the current,” he added.

When asked whether he wanted another term, the president responded, “I like working”.

“I’m not joking,” Mr Trump said, when asked to clarify. “But I’m not – it is far too early to think about it.”

When asked whether he has been presented with plans to allow him to seek a third term, Mr Trump said there were “methods which you could do it”.

How could Trump pursue a third term?

There are several methods by which Mr Trump could seek a third term if he wants to, experts say.

One would be to try and amend the Constitution.

Andy Ogles, a Republican US Representative from Tennessee and a strong Trump supporter, has proposed changing the 22nd Amendment to allow people to serve three non-consecutive terms as president, making Mr Trump instantly eligible again because his two terms so far have not been back-to-back.

This would prove “virtually impossible”, retired Commonwealth Court judge Joseph Cosgrove tells Sky News.

“The usual method requires two-thirds of both the House and Senate to propose an amendment, which would then require three-fourths of the states to approve,” he explains.

Trump supporter at a protest
Image: A Republican voter wears a ‘Trump 2028’ cap to a protest against federal immigration sweeps in Chicago in June. Pic: Reuters

Republicans only hold a slight majority in the House and the Senate, and control 28 state legislatures. Mr Trump would need at least 38 to support his move.

“Given the extremely close political divisions in the United States, neither of these events is foreseeable. Even if the Republicans control both the House and Senate, their majority will be so slim that no revision of the 22nd amendment could ever occur in this climate,” Mr Cosgrove adds.

Speaking on Sky’s Trump100 podcast, US correspondent James Matthews suggested Mr Trump would struggle to get support from his own MAGA movement, let alone the majority of the House and Senate.

“I don’t think the Republicans, the people who put Donald Trump where he is – the MAGA base, the money men – I don’t think they will see Trump as a man who in three years’ time will deliver for them,” he said.

Mr Trump would be 82 years old by the time he became president again, making him the oldest in US history.

Fellow US correspondent Mark Stone added: “There are also those around him who, while they will never admit it at the moment, they are circling. Whether it’s Marco Rubio, whether it’s JD Vance – they want the job as well.”

Mr Trump himself has endorsed them both, saying they would be “unstoppable” if they formed a group of sorts.

Another method floated by supporters would be for Mr Trump to run as a vice president in the next election, and then have the president-elect drop out after winning.

When a president drops out, there is a line of succession, with the vice president at the top of it.

John Fortier, senior research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, says some legal scholars have suggested this would allow Mr Trump to take over as president again, as the 22nd amendment “prohibits someone from running for a third term, but not from serving a third term”.

Mr Trump has addressed this method directly, previously telling NBC News that having JD Vance run for the presidency in 2028 before he handed over the reins was “one” way he could do it.

“I’d be allowed to do that,” he said later.

Mr Fortier says that this method, however, ignores a number of other amendments and other constitutional laws which indicate that a vice president or someone else in the line of succession “must meet the qualifications to become president”.

And Mr Trump, or someone else who has already served two terms as president, would not meet that criteria thanks to the 22nd amendment.

Mr Trump appeared to rule this method out on 27 October, telling reporters: “I think the people wouldn’t like that. It’s too cute. It’s not – it wouldn’t be right.”

Trump on Air Force One
Image: ‘It’s too cute’: Trump on running for vice president

Derek Muller, a professor of election law at Notre Dame, suggests Mr Trump wouldn’t even be able to run for vice presidency, let alone become president again.

He notes that the 12th amendment, which was ratified in 1804, says “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of president shall be eligible to that of vice-president of the United States.”

This means that because Mr Trump is not able to be president in 2028, he also cannot be vice president, Prof Muller explains.

“I don’t think there’s any ‘one weird trick’ to getting around presidential term limits,” he continues, adding that pursuing a third term would require extraordinary acceptance by federal and state officials, not to mention the courts and voters themselves.

“A lame-duck president like Donald Trump has every incentive in the world to make it seem like he’s not a lame duck,” he said.

skynews trump100 third office 7064403White House?”>
Image: Could Trump stay in the White House?

Mr Fortier suggests Mr Trump is talking about a third term for political reasons to “show as much strength as possible” rather than with the intention of running again.

Democratic congressman Daniel Goldman, who served as lead counsel for Mr Trump’s first impeachment, said in a statement: “This is yet another escalation in his clear effort to take over the government and dismantle our democracy.

“If Congressional Republicans believe in the Constitution, they will go on the record opposing Trump’s ambitions for a third term.”

Has a third term been done before?

Franklin Roosevelt served as US president four times from 1933 to 1945, because there was nothing in the original US Constitution that limited how many terms a president could serve.

But later the 22nd amendment limited presidents to two four-year terms, irrespective of whether they were served consecutively or not.

Franklin Roosevelt during his third term
Image: Franklin Roosevelt during his third term as president in 1942. Pic: AP

Congress passed the 22nd amendment two years after Roosevelt’s death and it took effect from the 1952 election.

No one has been able to serve more than two terms since.

The amendment states “no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice”.

UK Business Secretary Peter Kyle visits Brussels to advocate for “Made in Europe” access

Get you up to speed: UK Business Secretary Peter Kyle visits Brussels to advocate for “Made in Europe” access

EU COUNCIL ENGAGEMENT UK Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle is in Brussels to advocate for UK inclusion in the European preference scheme currently being drafted by the European Commission.

EU RESPONSE UK Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle stated a shared need for economic resilience in Europe, amid concerns over the EU’s “Made in Europe” strategy limiting UK access.

CURRENT STATUS UK Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle is engaging with EU officials in Brussels this week, advocating for UK participation in the forthcoming European preference scheme.

What we know so far

After its failure to strike a deal to tap into the EU’s defence loan scheme, the UK is now on a charm offensive to secure “Made in Europe” access for its industry.

UK Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle is in Brussels on Wednesday and Thursday to press the case for UK involvement in the European preference scheme the Commission is drafting, as speculation circulates that it will be limited to EU countries only.

“We have a shared challenge on the continent of Europe about economic security,” Kyle told journalists after meeting Commission Vice President Teresa Ribera, adding that “the continent of Europe should come together” to build “resilience” at a time of increasing worldwide economic tensions.

The UK fears Brussels’ push to favour “Made in Europe” products will shut London out of EU public procurement and state aid, escalating post-Brexit trade tensions.

London argues that the EU and UK economies are too deeply intertwined to withstand a strict EU-only European Preference.

The EU’s “Made in Europe” strategy is set to feature in the long-delayed Industrial Accelerator Act, held up for months by divisions among member states and within the European Commission. Baltic and Nordic countries have warned that the plan could curb innovation and restrict access to non-EU technologies, joining Germany in calling for a broad definition of “Made in Europe” that includes the bloc’s “trusted” trade partners.

France, by contrast, wants to limit eligibility to members of the European Economic Area – including Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland – as well as countries with reciprocal procurement agreements with the EU.

Limits of participation

London has previously sought to secure preferential access to the EU’s €150-billion Security Action for Europe (SAFE) defence loan scheme – so far, to no avail.

That programme also contains a European preference, with member states required to ensure that at least two-thirds of the weapon systems they buy using loaned EU money are manufactured in an EU or EEA/EFTA country or Ukraine. Third-country participation is capped at 35%.

Talks to bring the UK to the same level as a member state collapsed last November when they failed to find a compromise over how much London would have to contribute financially.

EU News understands that those talks fell apart over a major gap between the two sides: whereas the final offer on the table from the EU was around €2 billion, the UK estimated it ought to contribute just over €100 million.

But the UK also wants to participate in the EU’s €90 billion loan to Ukraine, two-thirds of which is earmarked for military assistance.

Starmer said last month that “whether it’s SAFE or other initiatives, it makes good sense for Europe in the widest sense of the word – which is the EU plus other European countries – to work more closely together.”

But the British premier is walking a difficult political tightrope. His Labour party is consistently polling several points behind the right-wing populist Reform UK, led by arch-Brexiteer Nigel Farage.

Yet, a recent YouGov poll showed that a majority of British people (58%) now believe that it was wrong for the UK to leave the EU, with 54% supporting rejoining the bloc. An even bigger majority – 62% – support having a closer relationship without rejoining the EU, the Single Market, or the Customs Union.

Brussels, however, has always been clear that the UK cannot pick and choose privileged access to the Single Market without accepting the EU’s “four freedoms”: the full freedom of movement of goods, services, capital and people – the latter of which would feed into Farage’s anti-immigration platform.

Today’s Football Fixtures| PL| Seria A| La Liga & more

Today’s Football Fixtures

Europa League | Knockout Round Play-offs

Crvena Zvezda vs Lille OSC

17:45

Ferencváros vs Ludogorets

17:45

VfB Stuttgart vs Celtic

17:45

Viktoria Plzen vs Panathinaikos

17:45

Bologna vs SK Brann

20:00

KRC Genk vs Dinamo Zagreb

20:00

Nottingham Forest vs Fenerbahçe

20:00

RC Celta vs PAOK

20:00

UEFA Conference League | Knockout Round Play-offs

Fiorentina vs Jagiellonia Bialystok

17:45

HNK Rijeka vs Omonia Nicosia

17:45

NK Celje vs Drita

17:45

Samsunspor vs KF Shkëndija

17:45

AZ vs FC Noah

20:00

Crystal Palace vs HSK Zrinjski

20:00

FC Lausanne-Sport vs Sigma Olomouc

20:00

Lech Poznan vs KuPS

20:00

International Friendlies

Mexico vs Iceland

02:00

Saudi Arabian Premier League | Matchday 24

Al Fateh vs Dhamk

19:00

Riyadh SC vs Al Ahli

19:00

Copa Libertadores | Matchday 2

Argentinos Juniors vs Barcelona SC

00:00

Cuba claims its forces shot dead four individuals on US-registered speedboat.

Get you up to speed: Cuba claims its forces shot dead four individuals on US-registered speedboat.

CUBAN BORDER VIOLENCE
Four individuals were killed and six injured by Cuban forces during an incident involving a Florida-registered speedboat that opened fire on a patrol vessel.

FLORIDA RESPONSE
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said he is initiating a comprehensive investigation with state and federal authorities following the incident involving the US-registered speedboat.

CURRENT STATUS
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has ordered a state and federal investigation into the incident involving the US-registered speedboat and Cuban patrol boat.

What we know so far

Cuban coast guard operation
The Cuban government says its forces have shot and killed four people on a US-registered speedboat that entered its waters and opened fire on a patrol boat.

The Cuban government says its forces have shot and killed four people on a US-registered speedboat that entered its waters and opened fire on a patrol boat.

It added that six others on the speedboat were injured.

The Cuban commander of the border patrol boat was also wounded, Cuba’s interior ministry said.

The injured were evacuated and are receiving medical attention, it added.

The ministry said the incident is under investigation to clarify exactly what happened.

Florida’s attorney general James Uthmeier said he was ordering prosecutors to open a separate investigation with other state and federal law enforcement partners.

“The Cuban government cannot be trusted, and we will do everything in our power to hold these communists accountable,” he wrote on X.

Florida congressman Carlos Gimenez, a Cuban-American former mayor of Miami, demanded an “urgent” investigation into what he called a “massacre,” adding US authorities “must determine whether any of the victims were US citizens or legal residents.”

“This regime must be relegated to the dustbin of history!” he wrote on X.

The speedboat came within one nautical mile of a channel on Falcones Cay, on Cuba’s north coast, when it was approached by five members of a Cuban patrol unit, Cuba’s interior ministry said.

The crew of the speedboat then opened fire, wounding the commander of the Cuban vessel, the statement added.

None of the dead or wounded on the speedboat were identified, but Cuba said it was registered in Florida and provided the boat’s registration number.

“Faced with the current challenges, Cuba reaffirms its commitment to protecting its territorial waters, based on the principle that national defence is a fundamental pillar for the Cuban state in safeguarding its sovereignty and stability in the region,” the statement said.

It comes amid a time of heightened tensions between the US and Cuba following increased pressure from Donald Trump‘s administration.

The two countries previously collaborated on combating drug smuggling and other crimes, but have ceased to do so.

The US has also blocked virtually all oil shipments to the island, piling pressure on its Communist-run government.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

LIVE German 2025 Election