LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Astronomers find evidence of magnetic fields on distant exoplanets with high-speed winds

Get you up to speed: How distant planets with 15,000mph winds could change hunt for life in space | News Tech

Astronomers have provided evidence that seven exoplanets have magnetic fields, correlating with unprecedented wind speeds observed on these Jupiter-like worlds. The research utilised the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile and the Gemini North telescope in Hawaii.

The research, published in Nature Astronomy, indicates that the magnetic field strengths on the seven studied exoplanets may be comparable to those found within our Solar System, being around four times the strength of Saturn’s field. Future observations with the Extremely Large Telescope are anticipated to provide insights into smaller, Earth-like planets and atmospheric signatures related to potential auroral activity.

Astronomers have reported a significant breakthrough in the study of exoplanets, revealing the first robust evidence of magnetic fields influencing atmospheric winds on seven hot, Jupiter-like planets. The findings, published in Nature Astronomy, suggest that future observations with the European Southern Observatory’s Extremely Large Telescope could provide further insights into these magnetic environments and the potential for auroras on distant worlds.

What remains unclear — The exact nature of the mechanisms that slow wind speeds on hotter exoplanets is not fully understood.

Astronomers find evidence of magnetic fields on distant exoplanets with high-speed winds

Astronomers find evidence of magnetic fields on distant exoplanets with high-speed winds
An illustration of a planet with a strong magnetic field outside of the solar system. Intense heat on the star-facing side and cold temperatures on the opposite side drive fast winds across the world (Picture: ESO/M. Kornmesser, L. Calçada/Cover Media)

Astronomers have found the strongest evidence yet that planets beyond our solar system possess magnetic fields, solving an important question in the study of distant worlds.

Using the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (ESO’s VLT) and the Gemini North telescope in Hawaii, researchers measured wind speeds on seven extremely hot, Jupiter-like exoplanets.

The findings suggest the winds are likely shaped by planetary magnetic fields, providing what scientists describe as the first robust evidence of magnetism on planets outside the solar system.

Julia Seidel, lead author of the study, said: ‘This breakthrough opens a completely new window on exoplanet research.

‘It’s the first time we can compare the magnetic environments of other worlds – a key step toward ultimately understanding which planets can stay alive, keep their water, and perhaps even, one day, host life as we know it.’

Magnetic fields are known to play a crucial role in shaping planetary atmospheres.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Earth’s field helps protect the atmosphere and is considered essential to maintaining conditions suitable for life. Other planets in the solar system, including Jupiter and Saturn, also possess strong magnetic fields.

However, despite years of study, direct measurements of magnetic field strength on exoplanets had not previously been achieved.

Researchers in this study, published in Nature Astronomy, did not initially set out to measure magnetism.

Instead, they focused on atmospheric winds across seven exoplanets orbiting distant stars.

These gas giants are similar in size to Jupiter but are tidally locked, meaning one side permanently faces their host star.

This creates extreme temperature differences between a scorching day side and a freezing night side, driving powerful atmospheric winds.

Wind speeds in the sample ranged from around 7,200 km/h (4,500mph)to more than 25,000 km/h (15,500,ph) By comparison, Jupiter’s fastest winds reach approximately 1,500 km/h (930mph).

‘In the beginning we set out to check if the atmospheric winds behaved the same way for all hot planets,” said Seidel, who is an astronomer at the Laboratoire Lagrange, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, France.

The team used data from the ESPRESSO instrument on ESO’s VLT in Chile’s Atacama Desert, alongside a similar instrument on Gemini North, part of the International Gemini Observatory.

coverimages55743082 5d60
A diagram showing how astronomers can infer the strength of magnetic fields in exoplanets from their effect on the winds on these worlds (Picture: ESO/M. Kornmesser, L. Calçada/Cover Media)

However, when the researchers compared wind speeds with planetary temperature, they observed an unexpected pattern: hotter planets tended to have slower winds.

‘This is totally counter intuitive because, all things being equal, hot planets have more energy to accelerate the winds. Something must happen that slows down the wind speeds for hotter objects,’ study co-author Vivien Parmentier said.

The most plausible explanation, the team concluded, is the presence of global magnetic fields.

These fields can act as a drag on atmospheric motion by slowing charged particles, effectively braking the winds.

This allowed researchers to estimate the strength of the magnetic fields on each planet, which they found to be comparable to those within our own Solar System – around four times the strength of Saturn’s field or roughly half that of Jupiter’s.

Such magnetic fields could influence more than just atmospheric circulation. On Earth, magnetic interactions between solar particles and the atmosphere produce auroras in the polar regions.

‘Here on Earth, we know the beauty of the northern and southern lights, where particles from the Sun hit our magnetic field and are guided toward the poles, colliding with gases in the atmosphere to produce colourful displays of green, pink, and purple,’ study co-author Bibiana Prinoth said.

On these distant exoplanets, scientists believe similar – and potentially far more intense – auroras could occur.

Future observations with ESO’s Extremely Large Telescope are expected to help researchers study not only gas giants but also smaller, Earth-like planets, and potentially detect atmospheric signatures linked to auroral activity.

Prinoth said: ‘I like to imagine that some of these worlds have a sky filled not only with stars, but with vast curtains of colourful light dancing across a planet that’s half in perpetual day and half in endless night.’

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

Zelenskyy proposes meeting with Putin to end war in open letter

Zelenskyy proposes meeting with Putin to end war in open letter

Meeting Proposal
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy proposed a face-to-face meeting with Vladimir Putin to negotiate a “full ceasefire” in an open letter sent to Moscow.
Geopolitical Engagement
Proposing a direct meeting signifies a potential shift in diplomatic relations, emphasising the necessity for leadership to resolve conflict, which holds significant implications for future negotiations.
Peace Proposal
“The choice is yours now. Enough of war. Ukraine proposes to end this war through direct engagement between us — and you,” said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Zelenskyy proposes face-to-face meeting to discuss end of war in open letter to Putin

Zelenskyy proposes meeting with Putin to end war in open letter

Published on Updated

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy proposed a face-to-face meeting with Vladimir Putin in an open letter to the Russian leader on Thursday, saying he was ready for a “full ceasefire.”

The letter marks one of the few times Zelenskyy has appealed directly to Putin since Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion and the first time he has ever sent a letter directly to the Russian leader.

“The choice is yours now. Enough of war. Ukraine proposes to end this war,” Zelenskyy wrote, adding “Ukraine proposes ending this war through direct engagement between us — and you. I am proposing a meeting.”

“It is leaders who resolve the key issues. That has always been the case, and it always will be,” Zelenskyy wrote, suggesting that Putin “set a clear date for such a meeting.”

“Do not be afraid to take the path out of this war. That is the main thing that is required of you now.”

“After 26 years in power, age is beginning to take its toll. And with time, the fatigue with you will only grow.”

The Ukrainian presidential office confirmed that although the letter was sent to Moscow, it was also shared with Kyiv’s partners, including the US.

‘This war is your personal choice’

Zelenskyy opened the letter saying when Vladimir Putin came to power over 26 years ago “many people in Ukraine viewed you positively.”

“That is how it was. But that is now in the past.”

Zelenskyy said now the “overwhelming majority of Ukrainians view it positively that our long-range drones paid a visit to the opening of your forum in St. Petersburg, covering a distance of more than 1,000 kilometers.”

“As you know very well, that distance is not the limit of our capabilities.”

“You have spent nearly half of your 26 years in power in Russia waging war against Ukraine,” Zelenskyy said adding that whatever Putin may have said about NATO, geopolitics, or the Russian language, this was a false pretext for the war.

“This war is your personal choice — a war without a real cause. That is how history will remember it.”

Zelenskyy said that even if Russia does not care about its military casualties, Ukraine does.

“We are losing our people, and every loss is painful to us. Even when the ratio of Ukrainian losses to Russian losses is one to five or one to six, it still matters greatly.”

“We in Ukraine do not want a permanent war,” Zelenskyy stated in the open letter.

“We know very well that life without war is infinitely better. And we want to achieve that.”

Zelenskyy also said he is “convinced that the majority of Russians would respond positively to this as well — and you know it.”

“Many did not believe that Ukraine would be able to hold out for so long. You did not believe it. And those who advised you did not believe it either. That was a mistake.”

Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for a meeting with Putin, saying only face-to-face talks will yield an agreement on territory.

The Kremlin said on Thursday evening that Zelenskyy is welcome to meet Putin in Moscow “any time.”

“Zelenskyy can come at any time to Moscow,” state media quoted Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov as saying, adding that Putin had not yet been shown Zelenskyy’s letter.

John Bolton agrees to plead guilty in classified documents case

Media Lens: John Bolton agrees to plead guilty in classified documents case


John Bolton to pay $2 million fine.

John Bolton is expected to plead guilty to charges related to classified information. The plea deal involves a $2 million fine, according to coverage in the latest US news and US and global politics.


What happened

John Bolton is expected to plead guilty in a classified-documents case and is set to pay a $2 million fine as part of a plea deal. The details of the case have been reported by multiple sources, including The Washington Post and Fox News.

Bolton, who served as a National Security Advisor, is facing legal repercussions related to retaining classified information. The plea deal is anticipated to have significant implications for him moving forward.

Key facts

  • John Bolton is expected to plead guilty in a classified-documents case.
  • He will pay a $2 million fine as part of a plea deal.
  • The plea deal involves charges related to retaining classified information.
  • The news was reported by multiple outlets, including The Washington Post and The New York Times.
  • Sources indicate that the case involves serious allegations concerning national security.

Where coverage differs

  • The Washington Post emphasizes John Bolton’s expected guilty plea in the case, while The New York Times foregrounds the details of his deal regarding classified information.
  • Fox News prioritizes the implications of Bolton retaining classified documents, while WSJ focuses on the opinion regarding the plea deal itself.
  • The New York Times presents a comprehensive background on the classified information context, whereas The Washington Post highlights the legal ramifications of Bolton’s plea.

One story, four angles


The Washington PostJohn Bolton expected to plead guilty in classified-documents case

Publication: The Washington Post | Primary framing pattern: legal | Tone: serious | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: This article highlights John Bolton’s expected plea deal over classified documents, emphasizing significant legal ramifications. It outlines the implications of his actions and provides detailed context on the ongoing investigation, portraying a serious legal atmosphere surrounding high-profile figures.

Publication emphasis: The article focuses significantly on the impending legal consequences for Bolton.

Framing analysis: The foreground is the expected legal plea and its potential impacts, while secondary details include public reactions and political implications.

Bias: Selection: Focus on legal repercussions. Language: Use of terms like “plead guilty” conveys severity. Omission: Less emphasis on any potential support or justifications from Bolton.

Assessment: The article presents a serious and professional viewpoint on a significant legal issue involving a former senior official.


The New York TimesJohn Bolton Reaches Deal to Plead Guilty Over Classified Information

Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: legal | Tone: informative | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: high

Expand

Espresso Shot: This piece details Bolton’s plea deal over classified information, stressing the legal complexities involved. The reporting underscores the gravity of the situation, with thorough analysis of potential repercussions for both Bolton and broader governmental implications.

Publication emphasis: The legal ramifications and the significance of the deal in the political context are the main focus.

Framing analysis: The primary focus is Bolton’s legal troubles and consequences, while the implications for national security and public trust are addressed secondarily.

Bias: Selection: Prioritizes legal consequences. Language: Strong, serious terminology. Omission: Fewer mentions of public support or political defenses.

Assessment: An in-depth look at serious legal developments affecting a high-ranking official adds weight to the article’s narrative.


WSJOpinion | The John Bolton Plea Deal

Publication: WSJ | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: critical | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: mixed | Legal precision: moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: The opinion piece critiques Bolton’s plea deal, exploring the implications for political accountability and integrity. It questions the adequacy of the legal response to Bolton’s actions, suggesting broader concerns about governance and ethics.

Publication emphasis: The focus is on the political implications rather than purely legal details, emphasizing accountability.

Framing analysis: The opinion foregrounds accountability in political leadership, while legal ramifications are presented as secondary concerns.

Bias: Selection: Prioritizes issues of ethics in governance. Language: Emphasizes critical terms regarding accountability. Omission: Less focus on the specific legal process or outcome.

Assessment: This opinion article pushes for political integrity in the face of legal issues, appealing to readers’ concerns about governance.


Fox NewsFormer National Security Advisor John Bolton to plead guilty to retaining classified information: sources

Publication: Fox News | Primary framing pattern: political | Tone: accusatory | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: negative | Legal precision: moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: This article outlines Bolton’s plea deal, using strong language to emphasize perceived misconduct. It positions Bolton’s actions within a broader narrative of political betrayal and irresponsibility, reflecting an accusatory tone towards current political leadership.

Publication emphasis: Focuses on Bolton’s alleged violations and the implications for political trust.

Framing analysis: The article foregrounds Bolton’s betrayal and misconduct while relegating legal explanations to a secondary status.

Bias: Selection: Highlights negative aspects. Language: Uses terms like “betrayal” to emphasize misconduct. Omission: Less attention to any possible legal defenses or contextual justifications.

Assessment: The article strongly critiques Bolton’s actions, shaping a narrative of political failure relevant to broader concerns about national leadership.


Food for thought

The Washington Post offers a strongest legal framing by presenting John Bolton’s plea deal as a formal acknowledgment of retaining classified documents, starkly highlighting the consequences of such actions. In contrast, The New York Times employs a more escalatory framing, suggesting that this legal outcome could spur deeper investigations into the broader implications of information management in government. Meanwhile, Fox News presents the situation with an interpretive lens, emphasizing the implications for national security. Ultimately, the coverage reflects diverse perspectives on legal accountability and political ramifications. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.

Dawa Sherpa found alive after six days on Mount Everest

Media Lens: Dawa Sherpa found alive after six days on Mount Everest

Story focus: Dawa Sherpa found alive after six days.

Primary entity: Hillary Dawa Sherpa   |   Region:

Main Geographic Focus: Mount Everest

Hillary Dawa Sherpa was found alive after surviving six days alone on Mount Everest. Rescuers located him while he was crawling towards base camp.

Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links


What has happened

Hillary Dawa Sherpa was found alive after being missing for six days on Mount Everest, where he had been left alone during a climbing expedition. He was discovered crawling toward base camp, approximately 20,000 feet above sea level, leading rescuers to describe his survival as nothing short of a miracle.

Sherpa had reportedly survived by consuming snow for hydration and sustaining himself despite harsh conditions. His rescue followed extensive search efforts by local authorities and fellow climbers, emphasizing the dangers inherent in high-altitude mountaineering.

Status quo

Dawa Sherpa, a mountaineering guide, was reported missing on Mount Everest. He became separated from his group during an ascent and subsequently survived for six days alone on the mountain. His rescue unfolded when he was discovered crawling towards base camp, prompting a response that highlighted the challenges faced by climbers in the notoriously treacherous region. Sherpa’s ordeal underscores the risks and unpredictability associated with high-altitude climbing expeditions.

Confirmed facts

  • Hillary Dawa Sherpa was found alive after being missing for six days on Mount Everest.
  • Dawa Sherpa survived alone on the mountain after being left on the peak.
  • He was discovered crawling towards base camp when search teams found him.
  • The incident has been described as “nothing short of a miracle” by rescuers.

Preconceptions

  • CBS News prioritises the miraculous aspect of Dawa Sherpa’s survival, framing it as a dramatic rescue by focusing on emotional storytelling.
  • ABC News emphasizes the rescue effort itself, detailing the circumstances surrounding Sherpa’s days spent alone and focusing on the challenges faced during the search.
  • Outside Magazine highlights Sherpa’s experience and resilience, providing a survival narrative that examines his psychological and physical endurance rather than the rescue logistics.
  • ABC7 Bay Area combines elements from both CBS and ABC, stressing the “astonishing” nature of the recovery while mentioning the ongoing risks of mountaineering, indicating reduced emphasis on the technical aspects of the rescue.

Elisions

  • **Rescue Details**: CBS News and ABC News focus on the emotional aspects of Dawa Sherpa’s rescue but provide minimal information about the rescue logistics or the teams involved. In contrast, Outside Magazine emphasizes the specific conditions under which he survived, detailing the risks faced on Everest.
  • **Physiological Impact**: While ABC News mentions Dawa’s physical state upon being found, it lacks scientific context. Outside Magazine, however, provides a more in-depth analysis of the physiological challenges of high-altitude survival, comparing it to other documented cases of climbers in similar situations.
  • **Community Response**: CBS News briefly mentions the local community’s reaction to Dawa’s survival. ABC News presents a narrative around the guide’s disappearance, while Outside Magazine elaborates on broader implications for climbers’ safety protocols, highlighting community debates and evolving practices based on recent incidents.

One story, four angles


CBS NewsGuide missing for a week on Mount Everest found crawling to base camp: “Nothing short of a miracle”

Publication: CBS News | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: Readers are directed to the miraculous rescue, highlighting the emotional weight of survival under extreme conditions.

Key differences:

  • Comparison: Emphasizes emotional rescue details more than others; Example: “Nothing short of a miracle.”
  • Comparison: Prioritizes human interest over technical climbing details; Example: Focus on the guide’s emotional journey rather than only the rescue logistics.
  • Comparison: More optimistic tone regarding survival; Example: “Found crawling,” indicating resilience and hope.

Bias: Selection: Focuses primarily on the emotional aspect; | Language: Uses “miracle,” enhancing a positive spin; | Omission: Lacks detailed accounts of rescue procedures.

Assessment: Readers first believe in the stunning impact of miraculous survival against odds.


ABC NewsSherpa guide missing for a week on Mount Everest rescued while crawling to base camp

Publication: ABC News | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: Initially focuses on the groundbreaking rescue of a Sherpa, positioning the human story at the forefront.

Key differences:

  • Comparison: More emphasis on facts regarding the rescue; Example: “rescue while crawling.”
  • Comparison: Includes more context about Everest’s dangers; Example: Brief insights on the perilous conditions faced.
  • Comparison: Carries a slightly more somber tone than CBS; Example: “Missing for a week” strikes a serious note.

Bias: Selection: Presents the challenge of survival prominently; | Language: “while crawling” highlights desperation; | Omission: Less focus on emotional relatability of the journey.

Assessment: Readers are prompted to view survival in a more serious light, acknowledging the broader context of risks involved.


Outside MagazineHillary Dawa Sherpa Survived Six Days Alone on Mount Everest After Being Left on the Peak

Publication: Outside Magazine | Intensity: (5/10) | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: Captures the feat of survival, emphasizing the individual struggle and endurance of the Sherpa.

Key differences:

  • Comparison: Focuses on the personal experience more than other outlets; Example: Uses the phrase “survived alone,” promoting individualism.
  • Comparison: Engages the audience with a narrative element; Example: “Fought against odds,” enhancing the survival story.
  • Comparison: Tends to downplay rescue details; Example: Less about logistics of rescue, more on the struggle.

Bias: Selection: Elevates personal journey over the rescue process; | Language: “survived alone” evokes strength; | Omission: Lacks details of the rescue effort by teams.

Assessment: Readers are led to perceive the triumph of the human spirit over frightening odds.


ABC7 Bay Area‘Astonishing’: Sherpa missing for 6 days on Mount Everest found alive

Publication: ABC7 Bay Area | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: Puts a spotlight on the rescue’s astonishing nature, evoking a narrative of disbelief and celebration.

Key differences:

  • Comparison: Shares the wonder in survival; Example: “Astonishing,” which sets a profound tone.
  • Comparison: Engages local context of the story; Example: Highlights community reaction to the rescue.
  • Comparison: Integration of regional pride; Example: Local angles emphasize the Sherpa’s significance to the area.

Bias: Selection: Celebrates local ties to the rescue; | Language: “Astonishing” elevates perception; | Omission: Less focus on the larger implications of mountaineering risks.

Assessment: Readers feel a sense of community and pride in the survival narrative, driven by local ties to the Sherpa.


In comparing the coverage of Dawa Sherpa’s rescue, CBS News adopts a more dramatic framing, emphasizing the miraculous aspect of his survival, while ABC News and Outside Magazine provide a factual recount, focusing on the details of his recovery. The most escalatory framing is found in the ABC7 report, which sensationalizes his story with the term “astonishing,” potentially amplifying fear over the dangers of Everest. In contrast, Outside Magazine’s framing maintains a more straightforward, humanizing depiction of Sherpa’s ordeal and resilience. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.


CBS News

Dawa Sherpa found alive after six days on Mount Everest

ABC News

Sherpa guide missing for a week on Mount Everest rescued while crawling to base camp

Outside Magazine

Hillary Dawa Sherpa Survived Six Days Alone on Mount Everest After Being Left on the Peak

ABC7 Bay Area

‘Astonishing’: Sherpa missing for 6 days on Mount Everest found alive

Support increases for US bill aiming to restrict arms sales to Israel

Get you up to speed: Block the bombs: Support grows for US bill to restrict arms for Israel

The Block the Bombs Act, which seeks to impose restrictions on arms transfers to Israel, has garnered 73 co-sponsors in the US Congress, marking significant progress one year after its introduction. Congresswoman Delia Ramirez, alongside advocates including Rashida Tlaib, highlighted this development during a news conference in Washington, DC.

The Block the Bombs Act has received support from 73 co-sponsors in Congress, an increase from 21 when it was first introduced in June 2025. Despite gaining traction, the bill has yet to be brought to a vote due to opposition from the House’s Republican leadership.

The Block the Bombs Act, which seeks to restrict arms transfers to Israel, has gained significant traction with 73 co-sponsors, marking a noticeable shift in Congressional support, according to Congresswoman Delia Ramirez. Despite this momentum, the bill remains stalled due to opposition from House Republican leadership, leaving advocates to call for a vote and increased public engagement in the political process.

What remains unclear — It is unknown when the Block the Bombs Act will be brought to a vote in the House of Representatives.

Support increases for US bill aiming to restrict arms sales to Israel

News|Israel-Palestine conflictBlock the bombs: Support grows for US bill to restrict arms for Israel

‘Long road’ remains ahead as bill garners 73 co-sponsors one year after its introduction in Congress, advocates say.

Rashida Tlaib news conferenceUS Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib joins colleagues and advocates at a news conference in support of the Block the Bomb Act in Washington, DC, June 4 [Ali Harb/WTX News]

When Congresswoman Delia Ramirez first announced the Block the Bombs Act to impose a partial embargo against sending weapons from the United States to Israel, only 21 Democratic legislators joined her in supporting the measure.

That was June 2025. One year later, the legislative proposal now has 73 co-sponsors, a tally that Palestinian rights supporters say represents “historic” progress.

list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Itamar Ben-Gvir: The face of Israel’s hard right — or the face of Israel?list 2 of 3Pro-Palestinian badges should not be worn by NHS staff, UK review suggestslist 3 of 3Israel must allow ICRC to visit Palestinians in prison, Supreme Court rulesend of list

“While some thought that the bill was extreme, it has, in fact, become pretty mainstream,” Ramirez said at a news conference on Capitol Hill on Thursday.

With 73 members backing the measure to restrict arms to Israel, the bill blows a crater in the nearly unanimous bipartisan support Israel has enjoyed in Congress over the decades.

Still, the number does not come close to a majority in the 435-member House of Representatives.

Margaret DeReus, the executive director at the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU), said it is important to “mark the progress” of such a bill, stressing that more lawmakers should side with the majority of voters in rejecting unconditional aid to Israel.

“We are coming from such a deficit, where Congress has been so lacking in the courage to do what’s right, that this is actually a huge improvement from where we were,” DeReus told WTX News.

“There’s still obviously a long, long road ahead.”

While Congress remains largely pro-Israel, advocates have called on its members to better reflect the shifting views of the US public. Multiple polls show that Israel is rapidly losing support.

In a recent survey by the Institute for Global Affairs, only 16 percent of respondents agreed that the US “should keep supplying Israel with weapons without new restrictions”.

‘Americans want us to invest here at home’

On Thursday, Ramirez stressed the need to bring her bill to a vote on the floor of the House of Representatives, citing multiple Israeli military campaigns across the Middle East.

So far, however, the bill has been blocked by the House’s Republican leadership.

The congresswoman also chided Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Donald Trump for their roles in the war in Iran, Israel’s invasion of Lebanon and the growing death toll in Gaza, where Israel continues to launch deadly attacks despite a “ceasefire”.

“Trump and Netanyahu will keep expanding the wars, so that they can continue to consolidate power, so that they can remain in office, and so that they can continue to profit off our pain,” Ramirez said.

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib also emphasised that it is no longer taboo to question Washington’s backing of Israel, highlighting the increased public awareness of Israeli abuses.

“Americans want us to invest here at home. They want us not to invest in death and destruction and bombs. They want us to invest in clean water and housing and childcare and so much more,” Tlaib told reporters.

“So many can’t even afford to go to the doctor, yet we’ll in a minute find money to continue to support the government of Israel to bomb civilians.”

The Palestinian American congresswoman credited ordinary citizens for the increased support for the bill, saying that change will come from the people, not from Congress.

“Regular citizens that do not share my faith or ethnicity have been showing up at town halls, saying, ‘Why are you cutting SNAP and why are you starving Gaza?’” Tlaib said, referring to a food aid programme for low-income families.

“You see them come and say, ‘Why are we funding genocide, but not healthcare at home?’”

Inside the bill

The Block the Bombs Act would ban transfers to Israel of certain heavy bombs and artillery ammunition — weaponry used in some of the deadliest attacks that occurred during Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

The bill started in Congress with progressives and vocal critics of Israel as its original supporters. But as the outrage over Israel’s atrocities in Gaza and across the region became louder, some unlikely names have joined the list of co-sponsors.

Congresswoman Valerie Foushee, who was elected to Congress in 2022 with the support of pro-Israel groups, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), co-sponsored the bill last year.

“We simply cannot continue to provide the Israeli government with weapons when they are not being used in accordance with international law to maximize the protection of civilians in Gaza,” Foushee said in August 2025.

In May, AIPAC congratulated Congressman Christian Menefee for defeating his Texas colleague Al Green in a primary that pitted the two Democratic incumbents against one another, as a result of redistricting.

Menefee became the latest co-sponsor of the Block the Bomb Act on Tuesday.

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, who lost his primary to a challenger backed by Trump and pro-Israel groups, also put his name on the measure this week, making it bipartisan.

“Israel has used American-supplied munitions to kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians,” Massie said.

“America is morally obligated to end support of Israel’s devastation of Gaza and its people. I’m cosponsoring the Block the Bombs Act to limit the transfer of offensive weapons to Israel.”

Congress shifts

The Congressional Progressive Caucus has also endorsed the bill. On Thursday, its chair, Greg Casar, said the growing support shows that speaking out, marching and contacting legislators can effectuate change.

“We need clearly to both take on the Republican Party but also change who we are as a Democratic Party if we want to save lives,” Casar said.

“The idea behind the Block the Bombs Act is simple: The United States should not be supplying bombs that we know will be used to perpetuate one of the worst disasters of our lifetimes.”

Legislators stressed that despite the ceasefire, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza persists, with Israel still restricting humanitarian aid to the Palestinian territory.

Congresswoman Lateefah Simon said backing the bill should not be a partisan issue.

“We should be clear — not red or blue, but as Americans — that we should put full bellies and humanitarian aid over bombs, particularly when you have hundreds of thousands of children and women and elderly folks who are starving, who are living in squalor,” Simon said.

“We are funding that humanitarian crisis. I think I only have one sentence left to say: Block the bombs.”

The one-year anniversary of the Block the Bombs Act comes as other legislative proposals that question US ties to Israel have also gained momentum.

On Wednesday, the House passed a resolution to rein in Trump’s powers to attack Iran without congressional authorisation, in a rebuke against the war the US and Israel launched against the country.

Forty out of 100 Senators, including an overwhelming majority of Democrats, also voted in April to block the transfer of military bulldozers to Israel.

Beth Miller, the political director at the advocacy group Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) Action, said that increased support for the Block the Bombs Act is driven by the activism of the Palestinian rights movement in the US.

But she noted that the number of co-sponsors remains “horrifically low”.

“It’s a sign of how far we have to go that the majority of members of Congress still want to send bombs to a country committing genocide,” Miller said.

“So that’s why we’re all going to continue to speak out. It is time for all of Congress to act. It is time to block the bombs.”

Study finds vitamin D and calcium may have limited impact on bone health

Get you up to speed: Vitamin D and calcium may not support bone health as much as thought: study

A study found that 73% of participants were “not at high risk of fractures or falls.” Researchers concluded that calcium, vitamin D, or combined supplements had “little to no effect on fractures.”

Seventy-three per cent of participants in the study were assessed as not being at high risk of fractures or falls. The findings suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplements have minimal impact on fracture prevention among this group.

Officials are reviewing the implications of recent findings indicating that calcium and vitamin D supplements have “little to no effect on fractures” for the general elderly population. As the research suggests that 73% of participants were “not at high risk of fractures or falls,” further analysis into alternative preventive measures is anticipated.

What remains unclear — The specific reasons why calcium and vitamin D supplements had minimal impact on fracture rates remain unknown.

Study finds vitamin D and calcium may have limited impact on bone health

elderly couple walking e1780593407156
Seventy-three per cent of participants were ‘not at high risk of fractures or falls,’ with calcium, vitamin D or combined supplements having ‘little to no effect on fractures.’

LIVE German 2025 Election