LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Democrats consider options for replacing Graham Platner in Maine Senate race

Get you up to speed: Who will replace Graham Platner if he drops out? Here’s how Democrats could pick a new Maine Senate nominee.

Democrat Graham Platner is facing pressure to withdraw from the Maine Senate race following a sexual assault allegation made by a former partner. The Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to replace him on the ballot if he steps down.

The Maine Democratic Party has until 5 p.m. on July 27 to nominate a replacement for Graham Platner if he withdraws by July 13. Meanwhile, party leadership is consulting legal counsel to understand their options and has not disclosed how they will select a new nominee.

The Maine Democratic Party is facing immense pressure to replace Graham Platner amid sexual assault allegations, with Executive Director Devon Murphy-Anderson stating that the process would be “open, transparent, and inclusive.” National Democrats are looking to swiftly choose a new nominee before the July 27 deadline, as major contenders, including Shenna Bellows and Troy Jackson, have expressed interest in running should Platner withdraw.

What remains unclear — The Maine Democratic Party has not specified how it will select a replacement nominee if Graham Platner withdraws from the Senate race.

Democrats consider options for replacing Graham Platner in Maine Senate race

Washington — Democrats are facing a rapidly closing window to replace Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner on the ballot amid a sexual assault allegation — if he decides to drop out.

At stake is one of the most closely watched and heavily contested Senate races of the year, as national Democrats seek to deny Republican Sen. Susan Collins a sixth term.

Platner is under immense pressure to drop out of the race from the Maine Democratic Party and top national Democrats, and a vow from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee not to invest in Platner. Support for his campaign collapsed shortly after a Maine woman he previously dated, Jenny Racicot, told Politico and CNN that Platner sexually assaulted her in 2021 — an allegation Platner denied Monday. 

He’s remained in the race following earlier scandals, including allegations of sexually explicit texts and concerning behavior toward women, revelations that he had made problematic posts on Reddit and his admission that he once had a tattoo widely associated with a Nazi emblem. Platner has denied allegations of misconduct but apologized for many of his past comments, citing PTSD stemming from his military service.

How could Platner be replaced?

Under state law, Platner has until next Monday, July 13, to withdraw from the race and remove his name from the general election ballot. If he withdraws before then, the Maine Democratic Party can replace him on the ballot, but it must make a decision by July 27 at 5 p.m.

“If a political party makes a replacement nomination for the general election by the deadline,” the law says, “the Secretary of State shall produce new general election ballots or amend or supplement general election ballots already printed.” 

State law does not delineate how the party should choose a replacement. The Maine Democratic Party would likely gather party officials for a nominating convention of some form, said Dan Shea, a political science professor at Colby College in Waterville, Maine. But details on how that process would work or who would get to participate remain hazy — and the party will need to decide quickly.

“My guess is, they’ll do the best they can to make it open and democratic. So it’s going to be open and democratic and very efficient,” Shea told WTX US News. “Those don’t usually go together.”

The Maine Democratic Party has not yet disclosed its plans for picking a replacement nominee. In a statement Tuesday, Executive Director Devon Murphy-Anderson said if a new nominee is needed, the process would be “open, transparent, and inclusive,” with “broad participation of Mainers and Democratic voters.”

In a memo to party members obtained by WTX US News, Murphy-Anderson said leadership “has been working around the clock to evaluate the options available to us,” and is in “ongoing consultation with legal counsel.”

“Until we have a complete understanding of the full range of legally permissible options, it would be premature to share details,” Murphy-Anderson added, asking members for “patience.” The memo was first reported by the Bangor Daily News.

In Maine politics, the sudden need to replace a nominee for statewide office appears to be unprecedented, Shea said. But national Democrats struggled with a similar dilemma two years ago, when former President Joe Biden dropped his reelection bid and was replaced by then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

“I think Maine Democrats are keeping in mind some of the controversy surrounding the … very narrow process leading to Kamala Harris’s nomination — the very quick, truncated process,” Shea said.

Who might replace Platner?

It’s unclear who the party might choose to replace Platner, who won last month’s primary with 72% of the vote. His top rival for the Democratic Senate nomination was outgoing Gov. Janet Mills, but she suspended her campaign before the primary election, and it’s not certain that the 78-year-old two-term governor is interested in reentering the fray or would be viewed as a top contender.

The Democratic primary for governor was far more crowded, and some watchers of Maine politics told WTX US News a few of the candidates who came up short in that race could be near the top of the list to replace Platner as Senate nominee. Those candidates include Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, former state Senate President Troy Jackson and former Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention Director Nirav Shah. Former state House Speaker Hannah Pingree won the gubernatorial primary.

Bellows, Jackson and Shah all called on Platner to drop out this week due to the sexual assault allegation — and expressed interest in launching Senate bids.

Jackson — a former Platner ally whose gubernatorial bid was backed by independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont — told the Bangor Daily News that “if Graham’s stepping away, I am very, very interested and think I’m the best person to replace him.” 

On Tuesday, Jackson filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission to form a U.S. Senate exploratory committee, which allows Jackson to begin raising money and gauge support for a potential Senate run without formally declaring his candidacy. The news was first reported by the Bangor Daily News.

Bellows said in a statement Tuesday that if Platner withdraws, she “will seriously consider entering this race, because I believe I am uniquely fit to united Mainers and defeat Susan Collins in just over 100 days.”

Shah has also shown interest in running, saying his team has “received hundreds of encouraging messages” in a statement that laid out his platform. Shah argued a new nominee should be chosen through a “transparent and open” process with at least one televised debate.

Other high-profile Maine Democrats include moderate Rep. Jared Golden, who has represented the red-leaning 2nd Congressional District since 2019 but decided not to run for reelection, and former House staffer Jordan Wood and Maine Beer Company co-founder Dan Kleban, who both launched Senate bids last year but dropped out fairly quickly. Wood also ran in the Democratic primary to replace Golden in the House, but lost to Auditor Matt Dunlap.

Some of the national progressive groups that supported Platner before the sexual assault accusation came to light have argued the next nominee should broadly share Platner’s politics and outsider image. 

“To the Democratic establishment: this is not your opening,” Our Revolution Executive Director Joseph Geevarghese wrote Monday evening. The group, which has its roots in Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign, specifically warned against picking a “status-quo candidate” like Mills.

Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, said in a statement Monday the Maine Democratic Party should nominate a “shake-up-the-system economic fighter who challenges powerful interests.” He added that the decision shouldn’t be left to a “small caucus of party insiders.” 

But state Sen. Joe Baldacci argued on social media the new Democratic candidate “has to be someone who is independent minded from Platner, otherwise they will be viewed by voters as a protege.” Baldacci, who previously ran for the Democratic nomination to replace Golden, has said he isn’t personally interested in replacing Platner.

The Maine Democratic Party said Platner would have no role in choosing his replacement, writing: “In no scenario is there a legal possibility for a nominee to be selected by an individual campaign.”

Do Democrats still have a chance of beating Susan Collins?

The Democratic nominee will face Collins, a moderate Republican who has long vexed her opponents in the blue-leaning state, in November. In 2020, she defeated Democratic nominee Sara Gideon by an 8.6-point margin even as Biden won statewide in Maine by nine points, and six years earlier, Collins defeated Bellows by more than 30 points. Collins sits on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, and her campaigns usually zero in on the federal funding that she has secured for Maine.

Ronald Schmidt, a political science professor at the University of Southern Maine, said he thinks Collins will be “very difficult to beat” regardless of the eventual Democratic nominee.

“Sen. Collins is very, very good at running for reelection,” said Schmidt. “She’s got a group of people who, although they aren’t necessarily in her party or … aren’t necessarily huge fans of hers, think she can do the job, and so they vote for her again and again and again.”

Schmidt believes Democrats could still mount a competitive challenge to Collins even if they need to swap out Platner at the last minute, though he said it’s still an open question whether the party can “summon up the energy they need to get the big turnout that it would take to dislodge Susan Collins.”

Shea said he thinks an exit by Platner could make defeating Collins more likely. He argued that many Maine voters were “interested in making a change” from Collins and agreed with Platner’s political views, but “worried a lot about Graham Platner’s character.”

“My sense is that it may be a blessing in disguise,” he said.

Trump warns he may withdraw US troops from Europe over Greenland dispute

Get you up to speed: Trump threatens ‘you are not going to have a Europe anymore’ if he pulls troops | News World

Donald Trump threatened to withdraw all American troops from Europe during a NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, on July 7, 2026. The president cited opposition to his ambition to annex Greenland as a key issue affecting his relations with NATO allies.

As part of the NATO Summit in Ankara, discussions are focused on defence spending targets and support for Ukraine amid rising tensions over Greenland’s territorial claims. The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, has initiated a review of American military forces in Europe to assess compliance with NATO members’ spending commitments.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves stated, “The future of Greenland is up to the people of Greenland and of Denmark, and not up to the US president,” reaffirming European support for Denmark amidst rising tensions over Trump’s territorial claims. In response to the ongoing dispute, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has initiated a review of American military forces in Europe to assess compliance with defence spending commitments among NATO allies.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how NATO allies will respond to Trump’s continued claims regarding Greenland’s territorial control.

Trump warns he may withdraw US troops from Europe over Greenland dispute

Trump warns he may withdraw US troops from Europe over Greenland dispute
Trump has repeatedly said that the US needs to take over Greenland (Picture: Getty)

Donald Trump has threatened to pull all American troops out of Europe as he again berated Nato allies over their opposition to his ambition to annex Greenland.

The president renewed his criticism and claim to the semi-autonomous Danish territory at the start of a crucial NATO summit this week.

He argued that the US needs to take over the mineral-rich Arctic island on national security grounds.

Sir Keir Starmer has previously joined with other European leaders to rally behind fellow Nato member Denmark and insist they would ‘not stop defending’ Greenland’s territorial integrity, fuelling transatlantic tensions.

Responding to a question on the dispute at the meeting in Ankara, Trump said: ‘That’s what hurt my relationship with Nato, because Greenland doesn’t help Denmark.

‘Denmark doesn’t spend money to really help Greenland, but it’s an important part for the United States, and it’s surrounded by Chinese ships and Russian ships, and that’s not going to happen.’

Sign up for all of the latest stories

US General Chris Donahue, outgoing US commander of NATO's land forces in Europe, inspects the troops in Valga, Estonia, on the border with Latvia, during a NATO Change of Command ceremony on June 30, 2026 in Valka (Latvia) or Valga (Estonia). A joint German-Dutch army corps (1GNC) is taking command of NATO land forces in Latvia and Estonia. Officially transitioning on June 30, 2026, this move establishes a dedicated second corps headquarters on the eastern flank to speed up reinforcements and command combat operations in the Baltic region. (Photo by John MACDOUGALL / AFP via Getty Images)
Trump has been threatening Greenland for months (Picture: AFP)

Trump, whose claims of foreign threats to the self-governing island have been challenged, argued it ‘should be controlled by the United States, not by Denmark’.

He added: ‘Europe’s a very different place than it was 20 years ago, a lot different, much different, much different, and they better be careful with immigration and energy.

‘If they’re not careful with those two things, you’re not going to have a Europe anymore.’

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: ‘The future of Greenland is up to the people of Greenland and of Denmark, and not up to the US president.

‘I’ve been very clear about that ever since it was first suggested.’

Greenland has been just one of the flashpoints in fraught relations between the US and its Nato partners.

Trump recently launched a fresh onslaught on allies’ defence budgets, claiming Washington was bankrolling other countries ‘without getting any benefit’.

It came after US defence secretary Pete Hegseth announced a review of American military forces in Europe as he questioned if some members were meeting their spending commitments.

Tensions had also been inflamed over what Trump viewed as a lack of support by countries for his war against Iran.

It has led the president to cast doubt on America’s commitment to the long-standing Nato alliance, which he has branded ‘a paper tiger’.

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

Estonia and Ukraine sign agreement to enhance defence industry cooperation

Estonia and Ukraine sign agreement to enhance defence industry cooperation

Defence Agreement
Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed an agreement on 7 July 2026 to enhance collaboration on defence technology and military innovation.
defence cooperation

The agreement enhances Estonia’s military capabilities by enabling joint production and technology exchange, leveraging Ukraine’s advanced defence innovations to bolster regional security efforts.
Collective Effort
“Closer cooperation will benefit our defence capability, the defence industry and Ukraine,” stated Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal following the signing of a new defence agreement.

Estonia and Ukraine sign drone pact to deepen defence industry ties 

Estonia and Ukraine sign agreement to enhance defence industry cooperation

Published on

Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have signed a new agreement aimed at expanding collaboration on drones, military technology and the defence industry, as European allies seek to draw more closely on Kyiv’s battlefield experience.

The agreement, signed on Tuesday on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Ankara, will deepen cooperation between the Estonian and Ukrainian defence industries, including the exchange of expertise in drone technology, cybersecurity, information technology and military innovation.

“Ukraine has developed one of the most competitive defence industries in the world” through its experience fighting Russia’s invasion, Michal said, arguing that closer cooperation “will benefit our defence capability, the defence industry and Ukraine.”

Defence products have “so far been subject to very strict export restrictions,” Michal said in a press release. Under the agreement, Ukraine “is ready” to export defence products to Estonia, a Baltic country of 1.3 million, while Estonia could procure Ukrainian-developed capabilities or work with Ukrainian companies on jointly produced systems tailored to the needs of the Estonian Defence Forces.

“It is important for Estonia to create as much combat capability as possible from every euro, and if possible, we also prefer local production,” he said.

The agreement would allow joint ventures to begin production in Estonia and Ukraine, with Kyiv providing the necessary export approvals for selected technologies, Estonian defence minister Hanno Pevkur added.

The agreement does not include specific financial commitments from the Estonian state, according to the government.

It comes as European countries increasingly seek closer defence-industrial cooperation with Ukraine, particularly in areas such as drones, electronic warfare and battlefield technologies, in which Ukrainian companies have gained extensive experience in the war against Russia.

US launches airstrikes in response to explosions in southern Iran

Get you up to speed: US says strikes launched as explosions heard in southern Iran

The US military launched airstrikes against Iran after explosions were reported in the southern regions, including the port city of Sirik and Qeshm Island. The strikes were a response to Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

The US Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed that airstrikes began on Tuesday, targeting multiple locations in southern Iran. As of now, there has been no indication of when operations may conclude or any detailed assessment of damage sustained from the strikes.

The US Central Command confirmed that airstrikes against Iran commenced following attacks on commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, while a US official characterised these Iranian actions as “wholly unacceptable.” In reaction, Iran’s foreign ministry asserted it would take necessary measures to protect its national security following the revocation of the temporary waiver on oil sanctions.

What remains unclear — It is not yet known what specific measures Iran may take to safeguard its interests and national security in response to the US airstrikes.

US launches airstrikes in response to explosions in southern Iran

DEVELOPING STORYDEVELOPING STORY, News|US-Israel war on IranUS says strikes launched as explosions heard in southern IranPublished On 7 Jul 20267 Jul 2026

The US military says it has launched airstrikes against Iran as explosions were reported in several locations in the south of the country.

The US Central Command (CENTCOM) said the strikes began on Tuesday, and are being conducted “in response to Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels that were transiting the Strait of Hormuz”.

Iranian media have reported several explosions in the southern port city of Sirik, as well as Qeshm Island and Bandar Abbas.

Following the blasts, Iran’s foreign ministry said it held the US government responsible for the consequences of breaching the memorandum of understanding (MoU) agreed between the two countries in June, which was supposed to put to an end to the war the US and Israel began against Iran in late February. The MoU mandated lifting the US naval blockade on Iran in exchange for Tehran reopening the vital Strait of Hormuz.

The US also agreed at the end of June to waive sanctions on Iranian oil for 60 days.

However, the US Treasury Department on Tuesday moved to revoke the temporary suspension of sanctions on Iranian oil sales after a tankers in the Strait of Hormuz were attacked. A Qatari tanker caught fire off the coast of Oman Monday after being struck by an “unknown projectile” in the Strait of Hormuz, according to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO).

Iranian television reported claims that the LNG tanker came under attack after ignoring warnings, but Tehran did not directly claim the assault. Neither the US Central Command (CENTCOM) nor the IRGC commented on the incident.

A second ship, a Saudi-flagged crude oil tanker, was also damaged in the Strait of Hormuz when the IRGC fired missiles, sources told Reuters news agency.

A US ⁠official warned that Iran’s attacks on vessels in the Strait ‌of Hormuz were “wholly unacceptable” and would ‌be ‌met with consequences, Reuters reported Tuesday.

In response, Iran’s foreign ministry said it would take any measure it deemed necessary to safeguard the country’s interests and national security.

Two paramedics and a patient killed in ambulance collision with truck in New Brunswick

Get you up to speed: Two paramedics and patient die after ambulance crash in N.B.

Two paramedics and a patient inside an ambulance died after a collision with a transport truck in New Brunswick, just west of the Confederation Bridge. The incident involved emergency personnel responding to a call.

The incident is under investigation by local authorities, who are examining the circumstances surrounding the collision. As of now, no further information regarding the identities of those involved or potential charges has been disclosed.

The New Brunswick government has expressed its condolences to the families affected by the tragic accident, announcing an investigation into the incident. Local communities are rallying for increased safety measures for emergency vehicles on highways, with officials signalling potential new protocols in response to the collision.

What remains unclear — The circumstances leading to the collision between the ambulance and the transport truck have not been detailed.

Two paramedics and a patient killed in ambulance collision with truck in New Brunswick

63178d78eb875c2057da7f699649ce697cb8d9b7df86d952901730e88d999e20 37c2d5
Two paramedics and a patient inside an ambulance died after the vehicle collided with a transport truck in New Brunswick, just west of the Confederation Bridge.

Trump announces lifting of Turkey sanctions and praises Erdogan at NATO summit in Ankara

Get you up to speed: Trump lauds Erdogan and announces he’ll lift Turkey sanctions as NATO summit begins in Ankara

President Trump attended a NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. He announced the lifting of economic sanctions on Turkey and indicated that the U.S. would consider allowing Turkey to rejoin the F-35 fighter jet program.

President Trump has agreed to lift some economic sanctions on Turkey and is considering Turkey’s re-entry into the F-35 fighter jet programme, from which it was banned in 2019. The summit in Ankara is seen as a significant moment for Turkey, emphasizing its complex relationship within NATO amid ongoing tensions with traditional allies.

President Trump announced at the NATO summit in Turkey that he will lift economic sanctions on Turkey and will consider allowing its re-entry into the F-35 fighter jet programme, actions aimed at strengthening ties with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker underscored the administration’s push for allies to increase their defence spending to 5% of GDP as the U.S. adjusts its military footprint in Europe.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how NATO leaders will respond to President Trump’s push for increased defence spending amid ongoing tension within the alliance.

Trump announces lifting of Turkey sanctions and praises Erdogan at NATO summit in Ankara

Washington — President Trump began the NATO’s summit in Turkey alongside Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Tuesday with a clear message that Turkey is a better friend to the United States than many of its traditional Western allies. 

“I was very disappointed with NATO,” the president told reporters alongside Erdoğan. “And frankly, if it weren’t held in Turkey, where my friend happens to be a very strong leader — a very strong, uh, person — it’s possible that I wouldn’t have attended. I felt I had to attend.”

The president began what Secretary of State Marco Rubio called “probably the most important meeting in NATO’s history” by announcing he’ll lift some economic sanctions on Turkey and will consider allowing Turkey to rejoin the United States’ F-35 fighter jet program, a program from which Turkey was banned in 2019 over its use of Russian military technology. 

Mr. Trump said he’ll lift sanctions on Turkey imposed through the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, a law deterring foreign powers from engaging in business with the adversarial Iran, Russia and North Korea. 

“We’re going to be taking the sanctions off,” Mr. Trump told reporters. “It’s time to do that. Okay? We don’t want to sanction friends. It’s very simple.” 

On the F-35 program, although the Trump administration is still considering what to do, Mr. Trump said the U.S. should help Turkey, a country that has “frankly has been more helpful to the United States than many other more traditional countries.” 

The summit continues Mr. Trump’s continued alteration of the United States’ role in NATO and the world — one of shifting relationships with traditional U.S. allies and a push for NATO members to take on the defense responsibilities carried by the United States since the post-World War II era. At the summit, the U.S. president will continue to push NATO countries to spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense. 

He does so as the U.S. slowly pulls some of its assets out of Europe, as he reignites a tiff with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and as his interest in acquiring Greenland unsettles and aggravates European allies. The president has at times questioned the usefulness and viability of NATO, keeping members of the 32-country alliance on edge for what he might say next.  

The location of the summit in the Turkish capital of Ankara is notable, and a big win for Turkey on the international stage. Amid strained ties with some European countries, Mr. Trump has, in his two terms in office, strengthened ties with Erdoğan. Although it’s been a NATO member since 1952, Turkey is at times a controversial member, with a complex economic relationship with Russia and a bevy of systemic human rights issues. 

Mr. Trump arrived in Turkey Tuesday, and was briefly greeted by Erdoğa before the two held their bilateral meeting. The president and other NATO leaders are attending dinner for heads of state. 

Turkey and the F-35 program 

Seated alongside Erdoğan in Ankara’s presidential compound, Mr. Trump said the U.S. will “consider” allowing Turkey to purchase the United States’ F-35 jets again, a long desired goal for Turkey. Only a handful of countries have access to the technology. 

Turkey was a part of the F-35 program until 2019, when it was removed and its orders were canceled over Turkey’s connections to Russian military equipment. Congress passed legislation prohibiting the transfer of F-35 aircraft to Turkey for just that reason. 

A reporter asked the president if he has any concerns about the F-35s mingling with Russia’s defense weapons systems. He said he did not. 

“I have no concerns at all about anything,” he said. “I mean, he’s a leader of a country that he’s made a much better country, much more powerful country. You see it— I mean, it’s beautiful, you get off, the roads are beautiful, it’s an amazing thing. No, I have no concerns about anything having to do with Turkey.”

Ahead of the president’s comments on the F-35 program, Republican Sen. John Cornyn said he hopes the president won’t return Turkey to the program, and detailed the requirements for allowing the country to reenter the program. 

Defense spending

Mr. Trump has long expressed his frustration with NATO members’ levels of defense spending and reliance on U.S. military capabilities and infrastructure in the post-World War II era. Since his first term, he has been pushing NATO members to increase their defense spending.

At the 2025 NATO summit last year in The Hague, NATO allies committed to investing 5% of their gross domestic product on defense by the year 2035, thanks largely to a push by Mr. Trump, and up from the previous target of 2%.

“Our goal continues to be shifting the burden of the conventional defense of Europe to our European allies and Canada,” U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker told reporters on a preview call Sunday. “The United States remains a proud NATO member, and I continue to show up every single day doing the important work at the alliance on behalf of President Trump, but we have responsibilities elsewhere in the world, as the world’s only superpower.”

That push to boost other countries’ defense spending and encourage “burden-shifting” will be a top focus of the president in Ankara, Whitaker said.

“Poland, the Nordic countries, the Baltic countries lead the way, and Germany is on track for the 5%, reaching it in 2029, but many others are lagging behind, and President Trump expects all allies to step up immediately, and not only get on a sustainable path to the 5% but get to 5% as soon as possible,” he said. 

The U.S. currently spends roughly 3% of its GDP on defense.

Whitaker told CNBC any uncomfortable moments over the defense spending push are simply “growing pains,” as the United States does “less” in NATO. 

Mr. Trump has offered harsher words for NATO members that he believes aren’t carrying their weight. Earlier this year, the president criticized Spain for opting out of the 5% commitment, threatening to “cut off all trade” with the country.

Reduced U.S. military footprint in Europe

A slow reduction of the U.S. military footprint in Europe goes hand-in-hand with the expectation that NATO countries spend increasing portions of their GDP on defense. 

The Pentagon has already announced a plan to withdraw about 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany, as well as reductions in fighter jets, tanks and other equipment. 

“Both our national security strategy and our national defense strategy talk about the priority we’re placing on burden-shifting in Europe, and that more capable allies in Europe will allow them to meet threats that exist in Europe that they’re perfectly able to meet, and that will allow us to focus elsewhere,” a senior U.S. official told reporters on a call on the condition of anonymity Sunday. “And so, there should be no surprise that we’re doing a posture review, or surprise that that posture review very, very well may lead to us adjusting our posture, because we’re trying to shift the burden to Europe, and we’ve been very specific about that in our major strategic documents.”

Greenland 

Mr. Trump hasn’t given up his hopes of acquiring Greenland, which is problematic for NATO given that Greenland is a semi-autonomous territory within NATO member Denmark. Both Greenland and Denmark are staunchly opposed to the idea. Mr. Trump reiterated the importance of the U.S. acquiring Greenland on Tuesday, when he met with Turkey’s president. 

“That’s what hurt my relationship with NATO,” he said. “Because Greenland doesn’t help Denmark. Denmark doesn’t spend money to really help Greenland. But it’s an important part for the United States. … That should be controlled by the United States, not by Denmark.” 

The president’s quest has aggravated not just Greenland and Denmark, but the other Scandinavian countries and much of Europe. The Trump administration’s military campaigns in Venezuela and Iran have taken the focus off Greenland, for now, and Mr. Trump said earlier this year that using military force to take over Greenland wasn’t on the table, but that doesn’t mean the president has forgotten about the Arctic island. 

The U.S. official told reporters on that call Sunday that acquiring Greenland would still be the best way to defend the U.S. and other NATO countries, although the administration is exploring other options. 

“We still think that’s the best way to meet the defense needs of NATO with respect to Greenland,” the senior U.S. official said of the U.S. acquiring Greenland, “but we’re also exploring with them all other mechanisms to address those concerns. But to emphasize, there really is no disagreement amongst any NATO ally about the importance of defense considerations of Greenland. It’s about how to solve them, and how to solve them permanently.”

Tiff with Italy’s prime minister 

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, once one of Mr. Trump’s favorite foreign leaders, has quickly fallen out of favor with the U.S. president. 

Last month, Mr. Trump claimed Meloni “begged me to take a photo with her,” but said he doesn’t want her as a “fan” because she was insufficiently supportive of the Trump administration on the Strait of Hormuz and Iran. In response, Italy’s foreign minister canceled a planned U.S. visit. 

Meloni herself said the president’s words “stunned” her, and criticized Mr. Trump for his behavior toward his own allies. But Mr. Trump hasn’t let go of the spat. On Sunday, without any context, he posted an image of himself and Meloni with the caption, “RESTRAINING ORDER NEEDED.” 

That could make things awkward in Ankara. But on Tuesday as he met with Turkey’s president, Mr. Trump took a slightly different tone. 

“I don’t know, I think she’s a nice person, actually,” he said, while adding that he disagreed with her on the Strait of Hormuz. 

The Strait of Hormuz 

The security of the Strait of Hormuz is a top issue for European allies, many of whom are far more reliant on Middle Eastern oil than the U.S. Shipping traffic through the strait is recovering, after the U.S. and Iran agreed to reopen the waterway as part of a 60-day memorandum of understanding last month, but shippers are still wary. 

U.S.-Iran talks during the fragile ceasefire are on pause for the multi-day funeral of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, killed in the initial strikes. 

On Monday, Mr. Trump said the U.S. will win the war with Iran “one way or the other.” 

“We’re either going to make a deal, or we’re going to finish the job,” he said in the Oval Office. “It won’t be tough to finish the job.”

Mr. Trump has been frustrated that European allies haven’t joined him in fighting Iran, and insists they haven’t done enough to help reopen the strait. When he visited the White House last month, Rutte repeatedly made the case to Mr. Trump that European allies, although they hadn’t done enough, have been helping the United States in its endeavors in Iran. 

Ukraine 

Mr. Trump, according to the latest schedule, is expected to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the summit. Mr. Trump has long said that he thinks both Russia and Ukraine want to make a deal, but more than four years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, a resolution remains unclear. 

Zelenskyy and NATO’s European members, which are much closer to the war than the U.S., will be sure to bring up the latest concerns at the summit. 

LIVE German 2025 Election