- Manitoba First Nations police and safety officers to receive £163.5 million
- DHS Secretary Mullin describes Ilhan Omar investigation as a strong case
- German police seize robot after it gropes girl in Cologne incident
- Pedro Sanchez defends Spain’s migration policy amid European criticism
- Israeli settlers attack journalist and burn olive trees in West Bank
- Pierre Poilievre asks Albertans to stay committed to Canada before vote
- Eric Deters files defamation lawsuit against Kimberly Guilfoyle in Kentucky
- Group stranded for five days in Australian desert after wrong turn
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Manitoba First Nations police and safety officers to receive £163.5 million
Get you up to speed: Millions in funding put toward Manitoba First Nations Police, safety officers
Manitoba First Nations police and safety officers will receive $163.5 million in funding from the provincial and federal government. Some First Nation leaders have expressed that this amount is insufficient.
Manitoba First Nations police and safety officers will receive funding over the next five years, with First Nation leaders raising concerns regarding the adequacy of the amount. No initial timeline has been established for the distribution of the funds or for any potential increases in financial support.
Manitoba First Nations leaders have expressed concerns that the $163.5 million allocated for police and safety officers is insufficient to meet the needs of their communities. The funding is part of a joint initiative by the provincial and federal government, but discussions are ongoing about potential measures to address gaps in safety and policing resources.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain what specific measures First Nations leaders believe are necessary to address their concerns regarding the funding.
Manitoba First Nations police and safety officers to receive £163.5 million

Manitoba First Nations police and safety officers will receive $163.5 million from the provincial and federal government, but some First Nation leaders say it’s not enough.
DHS Secretary Mullin describes Ilhan Omar investigation as a strong case
Get you up to speed: DHS Secretary Mullin calls Ilhan Omar probe a “strong case,” says agents executed multiple search warrants
Federal agents executed multiple search warrants in connection with an investigation into possible immigration fraud involving Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar, with one of the searches occurring at her Washington home. The investigation, which has not resulted in any charges against Omar, is being led by the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department.
Federal agents executed multiple search warrants on the same day, with the operation involving investigations into potential immigration fraud linked to paperwork from Ilhan Omar’s childhood. The investigation, being jointly handled by Homeland Security Investigations and the Justice Department, includes the issuance of grand jury subpoenas to several of Omar’s relatives.
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin indicated that the investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar could involve racketeering charges related to alleged immigration fraud, stating, “If someone … fills out their paperwork illegally… that can be considered a RICO case.” Omar has responded by denying any wrongdoing and claiming the investigation is “an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement.”
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether prosecutors are actively pursuing RICO charges against Ilhan Omar in relation to the alleged immigration violations.
DHS Secretary Mullin describes Ilhan Omar investigation as a strong case
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said federal agents executed multiple search warrants on the same day they searched Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Washington home. While appearing on a podcast Friday, Mullin described the ongoing investigation as a “strong case” while suggesting cases of coordinated immigration fraud could be prosecuted under federal racketeering laws.
In an interview with Andrew Kolvet, who hosts the “Charlie Kirk Show,” Mullin volunteered that multiple warrants had been served on Monday, adding that a judge had authorized the enforcement action and that investigators expected to present their case to a grand jury.
Omar has not been charged with a crime. She has called the investigation politically motivated.
“She wasn’t – or it wasn’t the only place we served the warrant,” Mullin said, referencing the D.C. residence of the Minnesota congresswoman. “There was multiple other warrants served on that same day.”
“We had a judge sign it, and we expect to be able to take the case to a grand jury,” Mullin said, revealing new details about the scope of the operation. “But I will tell you, we wouldn’t move forward, and President Trump didn’t want to move forward either, unless we knew that it couldn’t be politically driven. Now they want to try making it political driven. This individual wants to try making it about themselves. This was about enforcing once again our nation’s laws, and it’s a strong case.”
President Trump previously stated he didn’t know anything about the investigation, which is being handled by DHS’ Homeland Security Investigations division and the Justice Department. Asked about the Omar probe on Monday, Mr. Trump told reporters: “I think she’s a terrible person, but that’s really up to the DOJ.”
Mullin’s remarks came amid a federal investigation into possible fraud involving immigration documents submitted by Omar’s family decades ago. The documents in question date back to Omar’s childhood, involving paperwork completed by her late father when she was a child, WTX US News reported earlier this week. Multiple relatives of Omar received grand jury subpoenas as part of the investigation, and the lawmaker’s personal cellphone was taken by DHS, sources told WTX US News.
During the interview, Kolvet also asked Mullin about a hypothetical scenario involving a former foreign warlord who entered the United States as a refugee with his daughter. Mullin did not establish that the circumstances applied to Omar’s family. But the DHS secretary did use the hypothetical to suggest that those who submit fraudulent immigration documents and enable others to enter the country under the same purported scheme could very well be prosecuted under U.S. law.
Such conduct, he said, could potentially constitute a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, a federal law used to prosecute organized criminal enterprises.
“If someone … fills out their paperwork illegally, and they claim that they are this person and this is their background, and then underneath that individual, a lot of other people come in. And I’m just saying hypothetically across a whole bunch of cases that’s out there, then that can be considered a RICO case, right?” the DHS secretary offered. “Because there was conspiracy to deceive the American government, and therefore everything else that came in with it could then be looked at [part of] the same case.”
Mullin suggested that a racketeering prosecution could allow investigators to examine conduct extending back decades, arguing that statutes of limitations generally would not apply to such cases.
Under federal law, criminal RICO prosecutions are generally subject to a five-year statute of limitations, although in certain cases prosecutors can incorporate older acts into a timely prosecution involving an ongoing criminal enterprise or conspiracy.
In Grunewald v. United States, the Supreme Court held in 1957 that prosecutors cannot indefinitely extend a conspiracy simply because perpetrators covered it up after it ended.
Mullin did not explicitly indicate that prosecutors were pursuing RICO charges against Omar. But his remarks did suggest investigators are considering whether alleged immigration violations could be examined as part of a broader conspiracy rather than simply as isolated offenses. He said Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents had worked closely with the Justice Department to build out the case.
It is unusual for federal officials to speak openly about ongoing criminal investigations beyond confirming that a court-authorized search was conducted, in part due to due process protections and grand jury secrecy rules.
WTX US News has reached out to Omar’s attorney for comment.
Earlier this week, Omar — a staunch Trump critic who has drawn the president’s ire for years — denied all wrongdoing and said she “will not be silenced.”
“Make no mistake: this is an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement,” she wrote on X. “For ten years, Trump has targeted me with baseless lies and smear campaigns. This is just the latest escalation in his campaign of political intimidation.”
Sarah N. Lynch
contributed to this report.
German police seize robot after it gropes girl in Cologne incident
Get you up to speed: German police seize robot that ‘groped teenage girl on livestream’ | News Weird
Police in Cologne, Germany, seized a robot that groped a 16-year-old girl and made sexual gestures towards her during a night out. Two teenagers, the owner of the robot and a 19-year-old friend, were arrested on suspicion of controlling the robot at the time of the incident.
Cologne police have confirmed that the robot was discovered in the trunk of a vehicle following the incident, and both the robot and the suspects’ mobile phones have been confiscated as part of the investigation. Authorities are treating the incident as a new type of crime and have emphasised the importance of addressing the effects of such behaviour on victims.
Cologne police have described the incident as “new territory” following the seizure of a robot involved in groping a 16-year-old girl, noting they were previously unaware of such phenomena. Authorities have warned against making inappropriate comments or jokes about the incident, emphasising that it can exacerbate the impact on victims.
What remains unclear — It is not confirmed whether the two teenagers will face any charges related to the incident.
German police seize robot after it gropes girl in Cologne incident

The robot was dressed in a white vest, black bottoms and was wearing glasses, a gold chain and a fake moustache (Picture: Cologne Police via AP)
Police in Germany have seized a robot after it groped a 16-year-old girl and made thrusting movements at her on a night out.
Videos posted to social media show two young men steering the machine – dressed in a white tank top, black bottoms and wearing a gold chain and sunglasses with a fake moustache – towards a group of women.
One repeatedly shouts at the four-foot robot and pulls it backward after it makes sexual gestures, while people in the lively Cologne street laugh.
Two teenagers – the 16-year-old owner and a 19-year-old friend – were arrested amid suspicions they were controlling the robot’s movements at the time.
Their phones were also seized after the attack, which was said to have been streamed online.
Cologne police spokesman Christoph Bermel said the crime was ‘new territory for us’.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
‘We have not been aware of this phenomenon so far,’ he told The Associated Press.
Emergency teams that were dispatched to the scene near a fast-food restaurant found the robot in the trunk of a vehicle, Cologne police said in a statement on Monday.
The robot and the two young men’s mobile phones were confiscated.
North Rhine Westphalia Police Cologne, on Facebook, posted an image of the red-and-gold robot lying on the ground.
On the police’s Facebook account on Tuesday, officers criticised inappropriate comments and warned that sharing or joking about such incidents can worsen the impact on any victim.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Breaking News
Never miss the biggest stories with breaking news alerts in your inbox.
Pedro Sanchez defends Spain’s migration policy amid European criticism
Pedro Sanchez defends Spain’s migration policy amid European criticism
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez stated that Spain’s migration and asylum pact is effective, citing a notable decrease in irregular crossings in the EU.
Sanchez’s defence of Spain’s migration policy highlights its strategic move to regularise 600,000 migrants, which may enhance economic contributions while shaping EU migration discussions.
“The reality, the data show that Spain is pursuing a very responsible policy in the fight against irregular migration,” stated Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez in response to criticism.
Sanchez rejects criticism of Spain’s migration policy: ‘Words do not match reality’

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Friday rejected criticism from several European leaders over Spain’s migration policy and defended his government’s approach to tackling irregular immigration and managing migration flows.
“If you look at the facts, at the figures – which is kind of always what happens with the far right – it’s like night and day,” he said in Brussels, where he is attending the European Council summit. “What is being said has nothing to do with reality (…) one thing is the blah, blah, blah and another is reality.”
Sanchez was responding to comments by Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Austrian Chancellor Christian Stocker, who have questioned the Spanish government’s migration policies, particularly its extraordinary regularisation plan for migrants.
Sanchez drew a distinction between his disagreements with the Danish prime minister and the Czech leader’s criticism, which he likened to far-right rhetoric.
“With the Danish prime minister we have disagreements, but indeed, it has nothing to do with what the prime minister of the Czech Republic said, which, by the way, sounds very much like what the far-right Vox says in Spain,” he said.
Babis had accused some European leaders of being willing to “replace the population” to stay in power and warned that his country could tighten border controls to prevent migrants from arriving from other EU countries.
Stocker, meanwhile, described Spain’s regularisation plan as a “bad signal”, arguing that it could have consequences for the EU as a whole. Frederiksen has called on the European Commission to examine the implications of Spain’s measures.
Sanchez points to Spain’s record
In response to the criticism, Sanchez argued that Spain is making progress in controlling irregular arrivals and cooperating with countries of origin and transit.
“The migration and asylum pact that we secured under the Spanish presidency is working,” he said, adding that Spain is “a model pupil” in the fight against irregular immigration.
The prime minister cited interceptions in the Atlantic, returns and refusals of entry at airports as examples of Spain’s migration policy. He also rejected claims that Spain is part of routes used for secondary movements of migrants within the European Union.
“The reality, the data show that Spain is pursuing a very responsible policy in the fight against irregular migration, in managing regular migration flows and in cooperation with transit and origin countries,” he said.
Sanchez also stressed the importance of maintaining a progressive government in Spain, arguing that “because Europe indeed needs a contrast of opinions and political positions”, and urged his European partners to continue implementing the migration and asylum pact.
Von der Leyen calls for stronger external borders
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stressed the need to move forward with implementing the EU migration and asylum pact and strengthening cooperation between member states. She noted that irregular crossings of the EU’s borders have fallen by more than 56% over the past two years.
Von der Leyen outlined three priorities for EU migration policy: fully implementing the migration and asylum pact, strengthening the management and protection of external borders, and improving preparedness for potential border crises.
She also announced that the Commission will propose strengthening Frontex, the EU’s border agency, to expand its capacity to support member states when needed. She stressed that responsibility and solidarity must go hand in hand, while acknowledging that more work remains to be done.
“To succeed, it is necessary to continue acting together,” von der Leyen said, as European leaders remained divided over how to manage migration and tackle irregular arrivals.
Some countries push for changes to summit conclusions
Denmark, Poland and Italy pushed for changes to the summit conclusions, including an indirect reference to Spain’s plan to regularise the status of 600,000 undocumented migrants. Spain and France opposed the proposed changes.
A revised draft seen by EU News urged member states to avoid “measures that may create incentives for illegal migration”. However, the broader wording was ultimately rejected in favour of a shorter, less forceful version.
The draft also called on the European Commission to strengthen coordination between national migration policies that could affect other member states. The proposal, jointly backed by the three countries, was seen as an implicit criticism of Spain’s left-wing government.
Macron backs Spain
French President Emmanuel Macron said after the summit that “ideological divisions” between EU member states over migration were making them “ineffective”, while expressing support for Spain over the Ceuta crisis.
“We have had a bad debate,” Macron said. “My assessment is that when we politicise this debate at the table, we create divisions. And when we are divided and fall back on national solutions, we become ineffective,” he added.
Macron described the Ceuta crisis as a “humanitarian tragedy” and noted that France had not signed the letter sent to Brussels by 22 EU countries.
“Spain was the target of a hybrid attack,” he said, adding: “There was no need to wait until today to know who attacked Spain just after what happened in Ceuta.”
Israeli settlers attack journalist and burn olive trees in West Bank
Media Lens: Israeli settlers attack journalist and burn olive trees in West Bank
Story focus: Israeli settlers attack journalist in West Bank.
Primary entity: Heidi Levine | Region:
The main geographic focus is the West Bank.
Israeli settlers attacked journalist Heidi Levine and burned olive trees in the West Bank. The incident highlights ongoing tensions in the region.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
In the West Bank, journalist Heidi Levine was attacked by Israeli settlers while covering a protest against the burning of Palestinian olive trees. The incident occurred in the village of Burin, where settlers reportedly set fire to trees, leading to tensions that resulted in the assault on Levine.
Following the attack, Levine sustained injuries and was treated for them at a local hospital. This event has drawn attention to the ongoing conflict in the region, particularly the violence surrounding land disputes and agricultural production.
Status quo
Heidi Levine, a journalist, was attacked by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, resulting in injuries. This incident highlights the ongoing tensions in the region, particularly between settlers and Palestinian residents. The attack on Levine, who was documenting the situation, underscores the challenges faced by journalists in conflict zones. Details about the specific circumstances surrounding the incident are reported by multiple news organizations.
Confirmed facts
- Israeli settlers attacked journalist Heidi Levine in the West Bank.
- During the same incident, settlers burned olive trees.
- The event was reported by multiple news outlets including Reuters and The New York Times.
- The attack on journalist Heidi Levine resulted in injuries.
Preconceptions
- The New York Times prioritizes framing the incident as a broader reflection on Israeli settlers attacking Palestinians, while Reuters centers its coverage more on the journalist’s experiences during the attack.
- NPR emphasizes first-hand accounts and emotional impact, notably through a recount by a Washington Post photographer, whereas The Washington Post focuses on contextualizing the violence within larger narratives of journalist safety and anti-press sentiment.
- Reuters includes detailed descriptions of the physical attack against the journalist and the environmental impact (burning olive trees), while The New York Times highlights the implications of such actions on Palestinian communities.
- The Washington Post highlights the dangers faced by journalists, placing a more significant emphasis on press freedom issues compared to NPR, which focuses more on the personal experience of the attacked journalist.
Elisions
- Reuters and The New York Times highlight the immediate violence of Israeli settlers burning olive trees and injuring journalists in the West Bank, whereas NPR focuses on a specific eyewitness account from a Washington Post photographer, emphasizing the personal impact of the event.
- While the coverage from The New York Times attributes the incident to an organized pattern of aggression against journalists in the region, NPR’s reporting lacks a broader contextual analysis, instead centering on a singular narrative of the photographer’s experience.
- The Washington Post’s article addresses the aftermath and ongoing implications of the violence against not just journalists but Palestinian civilians, whereas Reuters predominantly details the event’s occurrence without delving as deeply into systemic factors leading to such actions.
One story, four angles
The New York Times – Israeli Settlers Attack Palestinians and Washington Post Journalist in West Bank
Publication: The New York Times | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The headline prompts immediate concern over violence against journalists and civilians, focusing on the gravity of the situation.
Key differences:
– Insight One: NYT emphasizes the attack on a journalist alongside civilians, presenting it front and center, whereas NPR focuses predominantly on the journalist’s recount.
– Insight Two: The NYT uses “attack” in its headline, which conveys an active and violent connotation, compared to more neutral language in other outlets.
– Insight Three: The NYT discusses the broader implications of such attacks on press freedom, adding depth to the narrative, which is less emphasized in competing outlets.
Bias: Selection: Prioritizes journalist safety over civilian narratives. | Language: Uses strong terms like “attack” to emphasize violence. | Omission: Lacks detailed context about the events leading up to the attack.
Assessment: The reader likely perceives the conflict as urgent and violent, heavily affecting journalists on the ground.
NPR – ‘Washington Post’ photographer recounts Israeli settler attack
Publication: NPR | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The headline highlights a personal narrative from a journalist, drawing attention to individual experiences in the conflict.
Key differences:
– Insight One: NPR’s focus on a photographer’s personal recounting offers an intimate perspective compared to the NYT’s broader report on the incident.
– Insight Two: NPR presents the incident with a focus on storytelling, creating emotional resonance over the statistical details of the attack.
– Insight Three: The NPR title implies a direct witness account, increasing relatability, unlike the NYT’s more comprehensive but detached approach.
Bias: Selection: Chose a personal narrative, potentially sidelining the broader context. | Language: Utilizes emotive storytelling language rather than hard-hitting terminology. | Omission: Minimal details on the systematic implications of such violence on press freedom.
Assessment: The reader is likely drawn into personal experiences, eliciting empathy toward the journalist’s plight over the larger conflict narrative.
Reuters – Israeli settlers burn olive trees, injure journalist in West Bank attack
Publication: Reuters | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The primary focus is on the physical violence against both the journalist and the environment, highlighting the destructiveness of the attack.
Key differences:
– Insight One: Reuters includes the “burn olive trees” aspect, hinting at agricultural damage alongside human injury, while other outlets don’t emphasize this ecological element.
– Insight Two: The Reuters headline combines both journalistic and civilian impacts, positioning the attack in a multifaceted manner compared to the relational storytelling approach in NPR.
– Insight Three: Reuters maintains a direct, fact-oriented style, potentially appealing to readers seeking clarity over emotive narratives.
Bias: Selection: Combines environmental and human impact, which might skew interpretation toward loss. | Language: Uses direct, impactful phrasing like “burn” and “injure,” which conveys starkness. | Omission: Less focus on the broader implications of such attacks for press safety and freedom.
Assessment: The reader perceives a dual narrative of physical violence against both people and nature, raising immediate alarm.
The Washington Post – Opinion | The dangers that journalists face
Publication: The Washington Post | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Mixed | Legal precision: Low
Expand
Espresso Shot: The title invites readers to engage with opinions around the risk faced by journalists in conflict zones, creating a reflective space.
Key differences:
– Insight One: The Washington Post positions itself in the opinion genre, which contrasts with the news reporting focus in the other selections.
– Insight Two: The title’s ambiguity leaves it open to interpretation, fostering debate rather than providing a definitive narrative on recent events.
– Insight Three: The commentary format focuses on analytical dialogue about the issue, lacking the immediacy central to the other articles’ reporting approach.
Bias: Selection: Chooses a reflective piece rather than immediate reporting, potentially losing urgency. | Language: Engages with speculative language about implications rather than firm statements. | Omission: Does not incorporate recent specific incidents that reflect the current risks of journalism.
Assessment: The reader is likely drawn into a broader conversation about press freedom, possibly underestimating the immediacy and severity of the current events.
The coverage surrounding journalist Heidi Levine’s attack by West Bank settlers highlights varying frames of analysis. The New York Times presents a more in-depth exploration, focusing on the broader implications of the incident and framing it within the context of ongoing violence, thus adopting a stronger investigative tone. Conversely, NPR’s piece emphasizes personal accounts of the incident, leaning towards an escalatory framing that heightens emotional responses. Overall, while the facts remain constant, the focus of scrutiny shifts depending on the narrative each outlet chooses to emphasize.
Related links
Reuters
Israeli settlers burn olive trees, injure journalist in West Bank attack
The New York Times
Israeli Settlers Attack Palestinians and Washington Post Journalist in West Bank
NPR
‘Washington Post’ photographer recounts Israeli settler attack
The Washington Post
Pierre Poilievre asks Albertans to stay committed to Canada before vote
Get you up to speed: Pierre Poilievre urges Albertans not to ‘quit’ on Canada ahead of separation vote
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre addressed concerns about disillusionment in Canada during a speech in Alberta. He stated that quitting is not a solution and that Albertans are resilient in facing challenges.
Pierre Poilievre has expressed his commitment to addressing the concerns of Canadians amid widespread discontent. He emphasised the importance of perseverance, stating that giving up does not align with the values of Albertans.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre acknowledged the public disillusionment with the current state of affairs in Canada, urging against a defeatist attitude. He emphasised that “quitting is the easy way out” and expressed confidence in Albertans’ resilience.
What remains unclear — It is not specified what specific actions Poilievre proposes to address disillusionment among Canadians.
Pierre Poilievre asks Albertans to stay committed to Canada before vote

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre says he understands the disillusionment with the state of affairs in Canada, but quitting is the easy way out and Albertans are not quitters.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.









