- Banned UK vapes repurposed to create power sources for Ukrainian soldiers
- Trump announces deployment of 5,000 additional US troops to Poland
- US economy shows signs of recovery as job growth exceeds expectations
- House Republicans cancel vote on Iran war resolution that had sufficient support
- Gaza flotilla activists share injuries sustained during Israeli detention
- Rodri criticises Premier League scheduling after Manchester City fail to claim title
- Mikel Arteta updates on Jurrien Timber’s recovery ahead of Champions League final
- Mikel Arteta reveals conversation with Andoni Iraola after Arsenal title win
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Banned UK vapes repurposed to create power sources for Ukrainian soldiers
Get you up to speed: How banned UK vapes are helping Ukraine win the war against Russia | News World
Volunteers in Lviv, Ukraine, are repurposing discarded banned UK vapes into power banks for frontline soldiers. The project, led by Ben Hoerber from Florida, provides essential energy sources to support troops amid ongoing conflict with Russia.
Volunteers in Lviv workshop have sent approximately 6,000 UK vapes to Ukraine for repurposing, with plans for additional shipments. The workshop aims to increase its production from 80 to between 100 and 120 power banks per month, supported by donations and a recently acquired non-profit status.
Volunteers in Lviv, including Ben Hoerber, are repurposing banned single-use vapes from the UK into essential power banks for frontline soldiers, addressing a critical need for energy in combat zones. The project has gained traction, with plans to increase production and explore additional innovations like using e-bike batteries and developing a ground drone for supply transport.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how many power banks Ben Hoerber aims to produce monthly in the future.
Banned UK vapes repurposed to create power sources for Ukrainian soldiers
Banned British vapes are getting a second life, powering vital devices for frontline defenders in Ukraine.
Since the government outlawed single-use vapes last June, volunteers in a Lviv workshop are repurposing thousands of discarded e-cigarettes from the UK into battlefield power sources.
Ingenuity is at the forefront of Ukraine’s fightback against the continuing Russian invasion, with cutting-edge Ukrainian drone tech drawing global admiration.
Joining this creative spirit, numerous smaller-scale projects have sprung up to support the ordinary men and women defending their country against brutal Russian attacks.
Most are run by relatives of those risking their lives to repel invaders. But some are organised by an unofficial army of foreign volunteers from the UK, Europe, the US and worldwide, who give their time, funds and skills to support Ukraine’s fight for freedom.

Ben Hoerber has been in Ukraine since 2023 (Picture: Ben Hoerber and Anca Marin)
Sign up for all of the latest stories
One of those volunteers is Ben Hoerber, 35, from Florida, a former teacher who felt supporting Ukraine was the right thing to do.
He says: ‘It makes more sense to be here helping than to pretend everything is normal in the world.’
Ben uses lithium batteries from the vapes to create power banks for frontline soldiers, often used in combat zone trenches.
‘Energy is like food and water on the frontlines – it’s essential for powering the equipment that keeps you alive,’ says Ben, who arrived in Ukraine in 2023.
Before the ban, it was estimated more than five million single-use vapes were thrown away every week in the UK.
In 2022, about 40 tonnes of lithium from disposable vapes were discarded, an amount which could power 5,000 electric vehicles.
Clearly, this untapped energy source could be put to better use than piling up in landfills across the UK.
How does it work?
‘The banned vapes are valuable because they contain rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, even though the device doesn’t have a charging port and is meant to be thrown away,’ explains Ben.
‘We designed a way to put enough batteries together for a power bank, using 50 vape power cells for one bank.’
Vape cases are cracked open, batteries extracted, then quality-checked with a homemade testing system.
‘We might use a small saw if extracting is tricky, but generally all you need is pliers and safety glasses,’ says Ben.

The lithium batteries are helping soldiers on the front lines (Picture: Ben Hoerber and Anca Marin)
Battery cells are soldered together, then wires are attached, running to a chip.
It’s all installed into a 3D printed box, embossed with a resplendent Tryzub symbol (a Ukrainian emblem of resistance). It’s tested, then glued together.
Requests for power banks come via volunteers connected to frontline units or from the units themselves, with Ukrainian volunteer groups sorting the logistics of getting them to the front.
One bank can power two devices at the same time, such as phones, screens, radios, drone batteries or anti-drone detectors. The power lasts for a good few days before it needs recharging.
‘The power banks are saving lives, because soldiers don’t have to run back frequently to recharge equipment, which potentially draws fire. The guys are always very grateful. One group charged their drone antenna system with our bank and sent us a picture – that was exciting!’ says Ben.
The curious alchemy of turning defunct vapes into life-saving power sources happens in a unassuming workshop on a humdrum street somewhere outside the historic centre of Lviv.

Frontline soldiers pictured with the power banks (Picture: Ben Hoerber and Anca Marin)
The city just 70km from the Polish border is a UNESCO World Heritage site with a stunning opera house, fabulous restaurants and a lively café culture.
No wonder it attracts a thriving volunteer community, who are united in wanting to help Ukraine in whatever way they can. It’s this ready supply of helping hands that drew Ben to base himself in Lviv.
The volunteers come and go, some staying for a few days, others a few weeks or much longer. Most seem to fall in love with Lviv.
‘On a good day, we have around eight to 10 volunteers in the workshop, usually from Europe and the US.
‘It takes about 15 minutes to teach someone what we do. I show them how to solder and review their work until it’s up to scratch.

A military man poses with Ben’s power banks (Picture: Ben Hoerber and Anca Marin)
‘It takes a new person about four hours to make one power bank, down to maybe two hours when you’re skilled.
‘But we have a manufacturing process with one person doing a single aspect repetitively, so they get skilled.
‘The UK vapes are great as they’re all the same design, which makes processing them easier,’ he says.
Last month, the workshop team produced 80 power banks, but is hoping to increase to 100 or 120 per month.
A regular volunteer in the workshop is Anca Marin, who helps process the vapes into power banks. But she also plays a crucial role in the overall operation by getting the vapes from the UK, where she lives, to Ukraine.
‘A Ukrainian friend introduced me to Viacheslav Semeniuk at Leeds Ukrainian Community Association, after I read about him using vape batteries to make power banks.
‘I processed a first batch of vapes for them. After that, I was given about 10,000 vapes for Ben’s project. I cut the vapes, remove the batteries, and secure them for transport. Of course, I also recycle the packaging as much as possible.’
How are the vapes shipped to Ukraine?

A soldier receives a delivery of power banks (Picture: Ben Hoerber and Anca Marin)
‘Batteries not in original packaging can be flammable, so you can’t use regular postal services,’ says Anca.
‘They are also quite heavy. So, I found a person who does regular humanitarian aid trips to Ukraine, so I drop them off with that person to be driven to Ukraine.’
Although the dedicated volunteers give their time and work for free, there are, of course, costs associated with production.
‘We have to buy the electronic chip – it’s about 1.50 dollars. Overall, it costs about five dollars for the materials to make one power bank. But a similar 20,000 milliamp-hour power bank would cost close to 50 dollars here in Ukraine,’ says Ben.
But then, there’s the cost of renting the workshop (1,000 dollars per month) and energy costs of about 400 dollars per month.
Set-up equipment, such as the 3D printer, was paid for from Ben’s own pocket. So, how does he manage to keep things going?
The answer is largely through donations via his YouTube channel, plus his organisation has just been granted USA non-profit charitable status, meaning it’s tax-exempt and eligible for grants.
The organisation name, Florida Man For Ukraine Incorporated, is a nod to his home state and a jokey reference to the ‘Florida Man’ internet meme. ‘I left my career as a teacher to care for my mother in Florida for six years.
‘Meanwhile, I worked as a bartender in the evenings and managed to save up a bit. After my mother’s death, I was planning to get away on a trip around Europe in my van.
‘But when the full-scale invasion happened, that changed because I wanted to help Ukraine. I learned the language online before coming, but had no other connections. I started out doing humanitarian runs in my van, then I met people and things went on from there,’ says Ben.
He started making the power banks in 2025 after working on several other projects. About 6,000 UK vapes have been shipped to Lviv so far, with another few thousand to come.
Then, they’ll need another source. But new ideas are always flowing, sometimes over a black coffee in one of Lviv’s chic coffee shops, where Ben goes to sit and think, while scribbling ideas down in his journal.
He also enjoys working out and using yoga to destress, as well as having a beer in the stylish bars of central Lviv.

Ben with a solar panel that provides power for people displaced by Russia’s invasion (Picture: Ben Hoerber and Anca Marin)
Next, he has exciting plans to use hoverboards to make a ground drone to move supplies to the front, so soldiers don’t have to risk their lives doing this. He also wants to use batteries from e-bikes in power banks.
‘I’m always planning for bigger things,’ he says.
‘We had a solar panel donated, so we just set up our first solar station in a settlement for people who have been displaced from their homes by Russia’s invasion.
‘I want to expand production to make more items and better quality ones. I’d love to open up another studio and have more volunteers come to help. More donations would be very useful too!’
Can he ever see himself returning to life in Florida? ‘My future is in Ukraine,’ he says.
‘What’s happening here affects us all; thinking it has no bearing on you is shortsighted. So, this is our time to do something about it. As long as the war is happening, my workshop will be open.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Trump announces deployment of 5,000 additional US troops to Poland
Trump announces deployment of 5,000 additional US troops to Poland
Donald Trump has announced the deployment of an additional 5,000 US troops to Poland, following his endorsement of Polish President Karol Nawrocki.
Trump’s announcement of an additional 5,000 troops highlights a significant escalation in US military presence, aimed at bolstering Poland’s security amidst regional tensions.
“President D. Trump’s decision to send 5,000 additional troops to Poland confirms that Polish–American relations are very strong and that Poland is a model, ironclad ally,” said Defence Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz.
More US troops in Poland – What does the country have to say about it

Donald Trump posted an unexpected statement late on Thursday evening, Polish time, on his social media platform Truth Social.
“In view of the electoral success of the current president of Poland, Karol Nawrocki, whom I proudly endorsed, and our relations with him, I am pleased to announce that the United States will send to Poland an additional 5,000 troops,” Trump wrote.
Shock on both sides of the Atlantic
The decision took both the Polish authorities and the US administration itself equally by surprise.
US media report that Trump is thought not to have consulted anyone before taking this step.
The New York Times points out that the Pentagon was not informed of the president’s decision. The paper reports that “the Department of Defense is referring questions on this matter to the White House” and is not commenting.
The Politico website, citing anonymous sources in the governments in Warsaw and Washington, says that no such decision was expected in either of the two capitals and that this is not all – Trump is said to have failed to say anything about it to other allies, including NATO members.
Unexpected, but the right decision
“This is good news for Poland and our Baltic allies. I am glad that the President has reversed the Defense Secretary’s decision to withdraw the brigade from Poland. Poland is keeping its promises and deserves our close cooperation,” Republican congressman Don Bacon, previously highly critical of US troop movements in Poland, commented on X.
Daniel Fried, a US diplomat and former American ambassador to Poland, takes a similar view.
“A good decision by Trump and those who worked to reverse initial bad intentions. Good for NATO’s security. Even better if the stationing/rotation of US forces in Europe is based on solid plans rather than politics**,**” he noted in a post on X.
He also raised some tactical doubts. “The question remains where the 5,000 troops for Poland will come from. Implementing a delayed rotation would be one way. But a politically motivated reshuffle of forces is also possible.”
Fried stresses that “moving troops mainly to reward or punish leaders, being in or out of favour, is not a good way to make defence decisions”. He appears critical of the way the decision was taken, but not of its substance.
The current US ambassador to Poland offered a brief comment on Trump’s decision on Friday morning. “President Trump is a man who keeps his word,” he said.
Joe Wilson, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, made no secret of his delight.
He believes that “President Donald Trump will always be appreciated for his bold and historic step in deploying US forces in Poland to deter the war criminal Putin”. “Today, another 5,000 troops to establish Peace Through Strength!” Wilson stressed.
There are, however, still no concrete plans from the US administration. The Associated Press, quoting retired diplomat Ian Kelly, reports that “most likely, at the highest levels of government there is a lack of any considered decision-making process regarding issues such as the deployment and manoeuvring of military units. These are not well-calculated decisions.”
“These are impulsive moves based on Donald Trump’s moods, or on the moods that, in his advisers’ view, Trump is in,” Ian Kelly told the agency.
NATO chief: Commanders are working out the details
“Of course I welcome this announcement,” NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told reporters before a meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Helsingborg, Sweden.
He added that “our military commanders are working out all the details, but I obviously welcome this news”.
“But let us be clear: the course we have set is for a stronger Europe and a stronger NATO so that, over time, step by step, we are less dependent on a single ally, as has long been the case with the United States,” Rutte said.
Nawrocki says thank you. So does the government in Warsaw, but not effusively
“I thank the President of the United States, Donald Trump, for his friendship towards Poland and for the decisions whose practical impact we can see very clearly today,” President Nawrocki wrote on X during the night from Thursday to Friday.
For its part, the Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland posted a photo of the two presidents taken during Karol Nawrocki’s visit to the White House last year.
So far, Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his office have not commented on Trump’s words. Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz did, however, post a message of thanks.
“President D. Trump’s decision to send 5,000 additional troops to Poland confirms that Polish–American relations are very strong and that Poland is a model, ironclad ally,” the defence minister wrote during the night.
He added that it is “a good thing that we are fighting together for issues that are fundamental to the security of our Homeland. It is a duty that translates into effectiveness.”
The interior and administration minister echoed him. “An additional 5,000 US troops will come to Poland. Huge work and an equally huge success for all those for whom the security of the Homeland is a priority,” Interior Minister Marcin Kierwiński said. But his list of people to thank does not include Nawrocki.
The former prime minister and current opposition MP expressed his gratitude to Nawrocki. Mateusz Morawiecki wrote on X that “the president has once again shown that in Poland–US relations, what wins is a tough, consistent approach, not petty politicking. Others could learn from this.”
Opposition politicians from Law and Justice are commenting on the matter in the same vein, highlighting President Nawrocki’s contribution, which Trump himself also referred to.
The head of Poland’s National Security Bureau, which reports to the president, adds that he had earlier received some positive signals.
“During Wednesday’s conversation with Elbridge Colby, Under Secretary for Policy at the Department of War, I was told that the issue of strengthening the presence of US forces in Poland would be resolved quickly and to the benefit of Poland and our alliance,” Bartosz Grodecki said.
However, as he noted, “such matters are discussed in private. Increasing the US military contingent is excellent news for Poland, strengthening our security and confirming the strength and durability of the Polish–American alliance.”
Trump’s decision appears to be a direct consequence of the turmoil that resonated widely and brought significant criticism of the US administration for delaying the rotation of troops stationed in Poland, a move that astonished both the government in Warsaw and the US authorities.
The lack of information and the US side’s evasive explanations triggered a diplomatic offensive by Poland. The Defence Ministry sent deputy ministers to Congress for talks, and the defence minister himself reported a phone call with Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth. The Presidential Palace backed these government efforts.
US economy shows signs of recovery as job growth exceeds expectations
US economy shows signs of recovery as job growth exceeds expectations
The Supreme Court is set to hear a critical case today that could redefine the boundaries of executive power. At issue is the Biden administration’s authority to implement a sweeping climate change initiative without explicit congressional approval. Legal experts suggest that the outcome could establish significant precedents regarding the separation of powers, potentially curbing executive actions that bypass legislative consent.
Market analysts are closely watching for the implications of this ruling on renewable energy investments. A decision favoring the administration might boost stocks in green technology, while a ruling against it could dampen market optimism. Investors should prepare for heightened volatility as the court’s decision is expected later today.
Key developments across the United States
How US politics and regulations have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic
US POLITICS — The COVID-19 pandemic continues to shape political decision-making in the United States.
Legislative measures aimed at addressing the pandemic have led to significant shifts in political priorities and fund allocations. The implications for public health policy and emergency preparedness are profound, influencing both current and future governance.
Major developments in US immigration policy amidst ongoing challenges
US MIGRATION — Ongoing changes in immigration policy are having a profound impact on migrants and local communities in the US.
Recent actions have shifted requirements for asylum seekers and visa applicants, complicating the legal landscape for many. These changes respond to both political pressures and humanitarian concerns, shaping the future of migration in America.
The role of local governments in managing public health crises
US HEALTH — Local governments are taking the lead in managing ongoing public health crises.
This has resulted in a wide range of strategies tailored to community-specific needs, emphasizing preventive measures and health education. Local initiatives are crucial as federal responses evolve, highlighting the importance of local governance in public health management.
Shifts in US energy policies as renewable sources gain traction
US ENERGY — Renewable energy sources are increasingly influencing US energy policies.
This shift is driven by technological advancements and legislative support aimed at reducing carbon emissions. The growing focus on sustainability is expected to reshape energy production and consumption patterns across the country.
Economic recovery efforts in the wake of the pandemic
US ECONOMY — Economic recovery efforts are intensifying as the nation grapples with the effects of the pandemic.
Stimulus packages and infrastructure investments are key to increasing job opportunities and stabilizing the economy. The long-term impacts of these initiatives will determine the pace and stability of the recovery process.
What to watch — Upcoming federal decisions on infrastructure funding may further impact economic recovery efforts across the country.
Further reading from US News sources
Reuters
Article title
Bloomberg
Article title
New York Times
Article title
Wall Street Journal
Article title
House Republicans cancel vote on Iran war resolution that had sufficient support
Get you up to speed: House Republicans pull vote on Iran war resolution that appeared to have enough support to pass
House Republicans postponed a vote on a measure requiring President Trump to withdraw from the war with Iran due to insufficient support, highlighting ongoing challenges in securing congressional backing for the conflict. The decision came as Democrats, led by Rep. Gregory Meeks, expressed confidence in their ability to pass the resolution amid a continuing ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran.
The House narrowly rejected a war powers resolution last week, resulting in a tie of 212-212, with three Republicans voting in favour. Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the legal framework mandates that Congress must authorise military action within 60 days, a timeline that has now expired.
House Republicans postponed the vote on a war powers resolution amid concerns about inadequate support, with House Republican Leader Steve Scalise stating the delay allowed absent lawmakers a chance to participate. Meanwhile, a growing number of Republican lawmakers are questioning the legality of President Trump’s military actions, with Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick asserting, “We’re past 60 days so it’s got to be brought to us to vote on,” indicating potential congressional pushback on military engagement without their approval.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how Congress will ultimately resolve its authority over military conflicts given the differing interpretations of the War Powers Resolution.
House Republicans cancel vote on Iran war resolution that had sufficient support
House Republicans on Thursday pulled a vote on a measure that would compel President Trump to withdraw from the war with Iran, delaying action on the issue as the Trump administration struggles to maintain congressional backing for the war.
The House had scheduled a vote on a war powers resolution, brought by Democrats, that would rein in Mr. Trump’s ability to wage war with Iran without congressional approval. But as it became clear that Republicans would not have the numbers to defeat the bill due to absences, GOP leaders declined to hold a vote on it.
“We had the votes without question and they knew it, and as a result they’re playing a political game,” said Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, who sponsored the resolution and serves as the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
It was the latest sign of uncertain support in Congress for a war that Mr. Trump launched almost three months ago, though the U.S. and Iran remain in a shaky ceasefire that began in early April.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking Member Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) speaks with reporters at the U.S. Capitol on May 21, 2026. Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images 
Last week, the House narrowly rejected a war powers resolution in a 212-212 tie, after three Republicans voted in favor. Earlier this week, the Senate voted to advance an war powers resolution, with four GOP senators supporting the measure and three others absent. The successful vote marked only a first step in the Senate, but it still marked a milestone for Democrats after seven failed attempts to advance Iran-related measures.
House Republican Leader Steve Scalise told reporters Thursday’s vote was delayed to give lawmakers who were absent a chance to vote. House Speaker Mike Johnson did not answer questions from reporters as he exited the House chamber.
In a joint statement, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other Democratic caucus leaders said Republicans were “cowardly” to pull the vote.
“Even as we prepare to recognize our nation’s fallen heroes on Memorial Day, House Republicans refuse to show up and be accountable to the brave service members that have been recklessly put in harm’s way,” they added.
On Capitol Hill, patience with the war has worn thin. Polling shows most Americans disapprove of the U.S. taking military action against Iran and do not believe the conflict is going well, and while direct fighting is largely on hold due to the ceasefire, the stalemate in the Strait of Hormuz has disrupted global shipping and elevated gas prices in the U.S.
The lone Democrat who voted against the war powers resolution last week, Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, has said he will vote in favor of the legislation next time.
Most congressional Republicans have been broadly supportive of Mr. Trump’s efforts to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
“I’m an American. I don’t believe in getting hit and walking away and pretending as though it didn’t happen,” said Rep. Brian Mast, the Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Still, a growing number of Republicans are now saying the president’s legal timeline to wage a war without congressional approval has expired. Under a 1973 law, presidents have 60 days to engage in a military conflict before Congress must either declare war or authorize the use of military force.
“We’re past 60 days so it’s got to be brought to us to vote on. We’re following the law,” said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, adding that he plans to vote for the war powers resolution.
The White House argues that the requirements of the War Powers Resolution no longer apply because of the ceasefire with Iran. At the same time, Mr. Trump said he was just an hour away from ordering another strike on Iran earlier this week, but held off because Gulf allies said they were engaged in negotiations to end the war.
The president said on social media earlier in the week that military leaders should “be prepared to go forward with a full, large scale assault of Iran, on a moment’s notice, in the event that an acceptable Deal is not reached.”
For Congress, the growing momentum to pass a war powers resolution could eventually lead to a legal showdown over who has the final authority over military conflicts.
The legislation before the House is a concurrent resolution that lawmakers said would take effect without Mr. Trump’s signature if it passed both chambers of Congress. But Mr. Trump has also argued that the 1973 law — passed by Congress during the Vietnam War era in an attempt to take back its power over foreign conflicts — is unconstitutional.
Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who has so far voted against the war powers resolutions, expressed frustration with the Trump administration’s stance, especially from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
“The current status quo, Pete Hegseth demonstrates how incompetent he is,” Tillis told reporters, adding that he would be willing to vote for an authorization for use of military force.
In:
Gaza flotilla activists share injuries sustained during Israeli detention
Get you up to speed: Gaza flotilla activists reveal wounds suffered in Israeli detention | News World
All 50 boats from the GlobalSamud Flotilla, carrying 428 participants from 40 countries, were intercepted and detained by Israeli forces while en route to Gaza. Activists reported injuries sustained during detention, and those who suffered harm are to undergo examinations at the Istanbul Forensic Medicine Institute following their arrival at Istanbul Airport.
An investigation has been initiated by Istanbul prosecutors into the allegations of mistreatment and injuries suffered by activists during their detention in Israel. Following their arrival in Istanbul, those with injuries were directed to the Istanbul Forensic Medicine Institute for examinations.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the treatment of flotilla activists by National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir “is not in line with Israel’s values and norms.” The Irish Department of Foreign Affairs is actively monitoring the situation and engaging with relevant authorities regarding the Global Sumud Flotilla.
What remains unclear — It is not specified whether further investigations into the treatment of detained activists will take place following their return to Turkey.
Gaza flotilla activists share injuries sustained during Israeli detention

Footage from a livestream shows one of the activists with injuries to his back, including purple bruising and cuts
The first images of wounds suffered by Gaza flotilla protesters while in Israeli detention have been revealed.
All 50 boats from the GlobalSamud Flotilla sailing to deliver aid to Gaza were detained by Israeli forces on Monday.
Some 428 participants were detained across 40 different countries, and held in detention until their deportation today.
One activist is seen with cuts and bruises on his back as he walks topless through Istanbul airport. He flashes a peace sign as he walks through security.
Italian journalist Alessandro Mantovani, one of the activists flown home earlier, said he had been beaten up on arrival in Israeli detention in what he described as a container, calling it a ‘place of terror’.
‘Beat you up means they kicked me in the legs and punched me in the face. These are people who know what they are doing, so I don’t have any major visible marks … They would beat you up and would tell you ‘Welcome to Israel”, he told reporters on arrival at Rome’s Fiumicino airport.
Another Italian activist, Dario Carotenuto, a lawmaker from the 5-Star Movement, said he had been punched in the eye and kicked while detained.
Israel’s national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir can be seen smirking, taunting and telling detained activists they should be imprisoned for a very long time.

Activists hug each other upon arrival at Istanbul Airport(Picture: Burak Kara/Getty Images)

Flotilla participants are arriving at Istanbul airport.
One handcuffed Irish woman named by activists as Caitriona Graham shouts ‘Free Palestine’ at Ben Gvir but is taken down quickly with her head forced to the floor as the minister is ushered away smiling.
After diplomatic intervention led to her being freed she was filmed saying ‘Free Palestine’ again as she hugged another activist.

Israeli minister Ben Gvir is under fire for ‘inhumane’ treatment of Gaza flotilla detainees

Activitsts reunite with their families (Picture: Burak Kara/Getty Images)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said although Israel has every right to stop ‘provocative flotillas of Hamas terrorist supporters,’ the way that Ben Gvir dealt with the flotilla activists ‘is not in line with Israel’s values and norms.’
A spokesperson for the flotilla said there is no legal basis for the arrest of participants trying to deliver aid.
The Department of Foreign Affairs in Ireland said officials ‘are actively monitoring the situation regarding the Global Sumud Flotilla’ and are engaging with the relevant authorities.
Follow WTX on WhatsApp to be the first to get all the latest news

Follow us to receive the latest news updates from WTX (Picture: Getty Images)
WTX’s on Whatsapp! Join our community for breaking news and juicy stories.
Meanwhile, the Israeli Foreign Ministry, on X, described the flotilla as a ‘provocation and a search for publicity’ and claimed there was no aid on board.
It added: ‘The purpose of this provocation is to serve Hamas, to divert attention from Hamas’s refusal to disarm, and to obstruct progress on President Trump’s peace plan.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Rodri criticises Premier League scheduling after Manchester City fail to claim title
TL:DR – Rodri criticises Premier League scheduling after Manchester City fail to claim title
- Rodri criticises the Premier League for insufficient rest after City’s FA Cup victory (see Rodri’s comments).
- City drew 1-1 with Bournemouth, jeopardising their title chase as Arsenal clinched the trophy (see Arsenal title win).
- Haaland’s late goal was not enough to secure victory after City’s cramped fixture schedule (see City’s struggles).
- Rodri acknowledged a lack of energy and congratulated Arsenal for their title achievement (see Rodri’s reflections).
- Guardiola’s potential departure may impact Rodri’s future at City (see Rodri’s contract situation).
Rodri complains Man City had unfair disadvantage after Arsenal win Premier League title

Rodri bemoaned the lack of time between Manchester City’s FA Cup final and their trip to Bournemouth (Picture: Getty)
Rodri has taken aim at the Premier League for refusing to let Manchester City’s players ‘rest a little bit more’ in the wake of the side’s FA Cup final victory.
Pep Guardiola’s men edged out Chelsea in last weekend’s showpiece at Wembley to secure a domestic double following the club’s Carabao Cup triumph earlier in the season.
However, just three days later, Rodri and Co came up short in pursuit of the Premier League title after stumbling in a 1-1 draw at Bournemouth, a result that handed Arsenal the trophy with a game to spare.
While Erling Haaland struck in stoppage time to cancel out Junior Kroupi’s stunning opener, City’s fightback ultimately came to late – and the full-time whistle sparked rapturous scenes in north London.
Jubilant Arsenal supporters flocked to the Emirates in their droves to soak up a first title win in 22 years, while Mikel Arteta’s players gathered at the club’s training base to enjoy the moment, partying long into the night.
With the Champions League final coming into view on the horizon, City’s slip-up at the Vitality Stadium means Arteta can now rest his key players for the Gunners’ final match of the top-flight campaign against Crystal Palace – a luxury Guardiola did not have on Tuesday night.
Asked if there was an element of City’s players ‘lacking energy’ due to fixture congestion, Rodri told CANAL+: ‘When you play all the competitions, when you play after three days when these kind of teams [like Bournemouth] have ten days to rest, it’s a massive difference.

City’s slip-up on the south coast came just three days after the FA Cup final (Picture: Getty)

There were wild scenes in north London as Arsenal sealed a first league title in 22 years (Picture: Getty)
‘We all know this but it is what it is. We have to play with these rules but at this level, having this amount of days, makes the difference.
‘We lacked a little bit of energy [against Bournemouth] because we played a final two days ago.
‘The Premier League didn’t want us to rest a little bit more but, yeah, at the end, congratulations to Arsenal, they were the better team and we will try again next season.’
The City midfielder – who scooped the Ballon d’Or award two seasons ago – took the opportunity to thank his team-mates in their ‘remarkable’ but ultimately unsuccessful efforts to chase down Arsenal.
‘Of course we know that it is done,’ Rodri added.
‘I just want to thank all my team-mates, I think we were remarkable in the way we tried in a season of ups and downs. But in the end, we knew it was going to be difficult because it wasn’t in our hands.
‘We wanted to push until the end but unfortunately we couldn’t reach the victory.’

Rodri and Co fell short in pursuit of a domestic treble (Picture: Getty)
Asked if City’s many instances of dropped points prior to their trip to Bournemouth had ultimately cost them the title, the Spain international replied: ‘The level of this league demands a lot.
‘You drop points in many cases as they have done, Arsenal, and the two teams were there.
‘Nobody believed in us in January but we rose as a team and we were able to win two trophies and even fight for the Premier League. It was a good season but of course, the standards of the club, we always want more.
‘Heads up, stand up and thanks to the supporters, everyone who supported us this year and City will be there trying again next season.’
Rodri hopes he and the rest of City’s squad are able to ‘see the whole picture’ once the dust has settled on a grueling season, which is reportedly set to be Guardiola’s last at the Etihad.
Asked to pick out his ‘biggest positive’ of the campaign, Rodri replied: ‘Right now, it’s a bit difficult to see these things but we will see the whole picture in a few weeks.
‘We knew that there was a lot of players coming in, they had to adapt, and it’s kind of a new era for us.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.









