Latest News
- B.C. Lions defeat Saskatchewan Roughriders to advance in playoffs
- Trump’s defamation lawsuit against Wall Street Journal dismissed with prejudice
- Erin Patterson sentenced to life imprisonment for poisoning three relatives
- Protests Erupt Across France Amid Ongoing Youth-Led Demonstrations
- Canada issues travel warning for Russia following U.S. ‘mass casualty event’ alert
- How to watch live results of the 2026 midterm elections on CBS News
- CCTV released as police search for man linked to sexual assaults in Nottingham
- Family of critically ill baby in Hong Kong seeks private flight to UK
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
B.C. Lions defeat Saskatchewan Roughriders to advance in playoffs
2:00 am
What’s the Latest: Lions roar back, oust Roughriders from playoffs
The B.C. Lions defeated the Saskatchewan Roughriders 33-26 in the CFL West Division semifinal in Vancouver, overcoming a 14-point deficit. The victory secured the Lions a spot in the upcoming West Division final against the Edmonton Elks on November 7.
The B.C. Lions will face the Edmonton Elks in the West Division final on 7 November following their playoff victory against the Saskatchewan Roughriders. This marks the Lions’ significant turnaround after starting the season with a 1-5 record, as they secured nine wins in their last ten matches to qualify for the postseason.
B.C. Lions quarterback Nathan Rourke expressed confidence after the team’s comeback victory, stating, “I think with what we’ve been through this year, I think this isn’t uncharted territory for us.” The Lions will advance to the West Division final against the Edmonton Elks on November 7.
What remains unclear — It is not confirmed how the Saskatchewan Roughriders will address the emotional aftermath of their playoff loss.
B.C. Lions defeat Saskatchewan Roughriders to advance in playoffs
VANCOUVER – The B.C. Lions staged a dramatic comeback on Saturday to defeat the Saskatchewan Roughriders 33-26 in the West Division semifinal, eliminating the defending Grey Cup champions from the playoffs. At halftime, the Lions faced a 17-13 deficit, prompting concern in the locker room. Quarterback Nathan Rourke, reflecting on the team’s resilience, stated, “When things aren’t going our way, that we’re capable of climbing out the hole.”
The Lions, who started the season with a 1-5 record, rallied to win nine of their last ten games to secure a playoff position. On Saturday, they overcame a 14-point disadvantage, with Rourke completing 21 of 32 passes for 366 yards and three touchdowns. “We just had to remember what we’re capable of and just try to string a couple of plays together,” he commented.
The Roughriders’ quarterback, Trevor Harris, expressed disappointment after the loss, noting the team’s aspirations for championship success. “A game like this is one that’ll keep you up at night. But it’ll drive you for improvement,” he said. The defeat concluded Saskatchewan’s season after they ended with a 10-8 regular season, equalling the Lions’ record.
Lions’ head coach Buck Pierce praised Rourke for his performance, highlighting a crucial touchdown pass to receiver Jevon Cottoy, who scored on a 70-yard play. “He never ceases to amaze me,” Pierce remarked. Cottoy himself acknowledged that the team’s heads were down at halftime but emphasised the need to seize the moment in the second half.
In a closely contested match, B.C. struck back with consecutive touchdowns after the intermission. They will face the Edmonton Elks in the West Division final on November 7, while the Roughriders must ponder the missed opportunities that ended their playoff run. As defensive back Tevaughn Campbell stated, “It really showed. You could see it on guys’ faces. You could feel the emotion in the room.”
Trump’s defamation lawsuit against Wall Street Journal dismissed with prejudice
12:00 am
Get you up to speed: Trump lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein birthday letter dismissed with prejudice
U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami dismissed President Trump’s multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal with prejudice, stating that Trump did not prove the defendants acted with actual malice. The lawsuit concerned a story about a letter allegedly linked to Trump in a birthday album for Jeffrey Epstein.
U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed President Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal with prejudice on Saturday, stating that the claim did not meet the standard of actual malice required for public figures. A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team indicated that they plan to appeal the ruling, while the lawsuit had previously been refiled after an earlier dismissal in April.
U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed President Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, ruling that Trump failed to demonstrate actual malice in the defendants’ reporting. A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team stated that they will continue to pursue the matter and are likely to appeal the decision.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether Mr. Trump’s legal team will successfully appeal the dismissal of the lawsuit.
Trump’s defamation lawsuit against Wall Street Journal dismissed with prejudice
A multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit by President Trump against The Wall Street Journal over a story reporting his ties to a birthday book for Jeffrey Epstein has been thrown out.
In a 20-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami dismissed the suit with prejudice on Saturday, ruling that Mr. Trump did not prove the defendants made defamatory statements with actual malice.
He said the lawsuit was “grasping at straws” as it attempted to “manufacture” flaws in the WSJ’s investigative reporting.
Actual malice requires that plaintiffs prove that statements made about a public figure were published with the knowledge that they were false, or with disregard for whether they are true or not.
When a case is thrown out “with prejudice,” it cannot be refiled again, and the dismissal is permanent and incontrovertible.
“President Trump will continue to press forward in his powerhouse lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and all of the other defendants,” a spokesperson for Mr. Trump’s legal team told WTX US News in a statement. “The President will continue to hold those who mislead the American People with Fake News and smears accountable for their actions.”
A source familiar with Mr. Trump’s legal strategy said that the decision will likely be appealed.
The lawsuit was over a story the WSJ published last year describing a sexually suggestive letter that the paper said bore Mr. Trump’s name and was included in a 2003 album compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday.
The president dismissed the story as “FAKE” and filed a $20 billion lawsuit against the paper, its parent company News Corp, the company’s CEO, the reporters who wrote the story and Rupert Murdoch, News Corp’s chairman emeritus.
House lawmakers later subpoenaed and obtained a redacted version of the birthday book from Epstein’s estate, which included the letter at the center of Mr. Trump’s lawsuit. Then-White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: “It’s very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it.”
In April, Gayles dismissed the lawsuit, saying the president’s legal team failed to clear the legal bar needed to establish their claim. He ruled that the president came “nowhere close” to showing the paper acted with “actual malice” toward him, the standard for bringing a defamation suit as a public figure.
Mr. Trump’s legal team refiled the lawsuit.
Erin Patterson sentenced to life imprisonment for poisoning three relatives
11:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Poisonous mushroom killer ‘must never be released’ over ‘extraordinarily cold’ murders | News World
Erin Patterson was sentenced to life in prison for the murders of her parents-in-law and aunt-in-law after serving them a beef wellington laced with poisonous mushrooms at her home in Leongatha, Victoria. The Court of Appeal in Melbourne has upheld her conviction, dismissing her appeal for a retrial.
Homicide squad detectives are continuing their investigation into the circumstances surrounding the lunch that led to three fatalities on 29 July 2023. Erin Patterson’s attempt to appeal her conviction was dismissed by the Court of Appeal in Melbourne, and she must now seek further recourse in the High Court.
The Court of Appeal in Melbourne has refused Erin Patterson’s request to overturn her life sentence for the murders of her parents-in-law and aunt-in-law, with Justice Stephen McLeish stating, “this offending was extraordinarily cold and calculated.” Patterson’s lawyers plan to appeal to the High Court as she faces a minimum term of 33 years before becoming eligible for parole.
What remains unclear — It is not known whether Erin Patterson will appeal her case to the High Court as planned.
Erin Patterson sentenced to life imprisonment for poisoning three relatives
Erin Patterson was sentenced to life in prison in September 2025. (Photo by Martin KEEP / AFP via Getty Images)
An Australian mum-of-two who murdered three people by serving beef wellington laced with poisonous mushrooms will never be released from prison.
Erin Patterson was refused by the Court of Appeal in Melbourne to have her convictions overturned after her lawyers argued she had suffered a miscarriage of justice.
She was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum of 33 years in September 2025 over the murders of her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, and her aunt-in-law Heather Wilkinson.
They were served a beef wellington laced with poisonous death cap mushrooms at Patterson’s home in Leongatha, Victoria, for a ‘reconciliation lunch’ and later died in hospital.
Mrs Wilkinson’s husband Ian was also served the meal but survived.
Patterson’s ex-husband, Simon, was also invited but decided last-minute not to attend.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Justice Stephen McLeish said: ‘This offending was extraordinarily cold and calculated and stands to be denounced in the strongest terms.
Don and Gail Patterson died after eating the beef wellington prepared and served by their daughter-in-law
Heather Wilkinson, who died in hospital after eating a meal which contained poisoned mushroom (Picture: AAP)
‘In all the circumstances after anxious consideration, we have concluded that the case involved such shocking criminality as it is inappropriate to fix a non-parole period.’
Patterson’s lawyers argued that prosecutor Nanette Rogers was ‘unfair and oppressive’ in cross-examining her for five days.
They also said the judge, Christopher Bale, had caused ‘unfair prejudice’ by allowing evidence from Patterson’s Facebook friends.
The court dismissed her attempt, and she must now appeal to the court’s High Court.
After becoming unwell, Heather spoke to Simon to tell him Patterson had eaten from a ‘noticeably different’ plate.
Ian Wilkinson was the only survivor of the meal (Picture: via REUTERS)
Simon Patterson decided at the last minute not to attend the ‘reconciliation lunch’ (Picture: AP)
‘Does Erin have a shortage of crockery? I have been wondering about it since yesterday,’ Heather said, according to the prosecutor.
Their symptoms were described as being consistent with poisoning by death cap mushrooms, which is a dull green fungus known scientifically as Amanita phalloides and can cause serious organ failure within 24 to 48 hours.
Prosecutors suggested Patterson had two faces – the woman who publicly appeared to have a good relationship with her parents-in-law, while her private feelings about them were kept hidden.
Patterson previously said she became unwell after eating the meal, and while in the hospital, her ex-husband, Simon Patterson, accused her of poisoning his parents.
The trial also heard that Patterson had told her friends she was hiding ‘powdered mushrooms in everything’.
A woman who met Erin through a true crime forum on Facebook has said the accused killer was a ‘bit of a super sleuth.’
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
Breaking News
Never miss the biggest stories with breaking news alerts in your inbox.
Protests Erupt Across France Amid Ongoing Youth-Led Demonstrations
9:00 pm
Media Lens: Protests Erupt Across France Amid Ongoing Youth-Led Demonstrations
Protesters gather in Paris and other French cities as part of planned demonstrations. These events occur amid the lead-up to Halloween, with thousands expected to participate.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
On Halloween 2026, thousands of protesters gathered in Paris and other French cities, demonstrating against issues that have sparked widespread national concern. The protests featured various social and political groups, reflecting a significant grassroots movement seeking change.
While some protests remained peaceful, there were reports of isolated clashes in certain areas, leading to heightened tensions between demonstrators and law enforcement. The demonstrations were part of a larger wave of youth-led rallies across Europe, indicating a growing fervor among young activists advocating for social justice and reform.
Status quo
Multiple protests have taken place in Paris and other French cities. These demonstrations reflect ongoing tensions regarding various social and political issues in France, with significant participation expected around Halloween. Authorities are bracing for large gatherings as activists express their discontent, particularly among youth, echoing similar movements observed across Europe. This situation follows previous protests that have seen both peaceful marches and clashes.
Confirmed facts
- Thousands are expected to protest in France on Halloween.
- Protests have been taking place in Paris and other cities across France.
- The protests are reportedly led by youths and are part of a wider movement in Europe.
- Clashes have occurred during some of these protests, particularly after peaceful marches.
Preconceptions
- The New York Times prioritizes the scale of the protests, headlining “Thousands Expected to Protest in France on Halloween: Live Updates,” while Reuters focuses on the tensions and isolated clashes that arise amid the protests with “Isolated clashes in France, as tensions erupt after peaceful marches.”
- AP News emphasizes the ongoing nature of the protests and the broader youth-led movement across Europe, mentioning “A third weekend of protests in France as youth-led rallies sweep Europe.” In contrast, JW.ORG centers its coverage on youth involvement in protests without discussing tensions or outcomes.
- Reuters highlights the aftermath of protests, particularly focusing on clashes that suggest conflict, while The New York Times maintains a neutral tone on the situation without mentioning violence, indicating a different editorial approach to the same event.
Elisions
- The New York Times focused on the expected turnout for protests in France, emphasizing the scale and organization of the events, whereas Reuters reported specific individual incidents of violence and isolated clashes that occurred during the marches.
- AP News provided insights on the broader implications of the protests and the youth engagement across Europe, whereas JW.ORG largely presented a perspective that downplayed the scale of unrest, focusing instead on the religious implications of the protests.
- While all sources reported on the ongoing protests, only The New York Times and Reuters mentioned the government’s response measures, including potential police actions and statements from officials, which were absent in the reports from JW.ORG and AP News.
One story, four angles
The New York Times – Thousands Expected to Protest in France on Halloween: Live Updates
Publication: The New York Times | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The emphasis on “thousands expected” signals significant public engagement in protest, steering attention toward potential widespread dissent rather than isolated incidents.
Key differences:
1. Comparison: NYT’s focus on “thousands expected” contrasts with other outlets that mention “isolated clashes.” Example: “Thousands Expected” vs “Isolated clashes” from Reuters emphasizes scale over singular events.
2. Comparison: The NYT’s phrase “live updates” conveys continuous coverage, unlike static headlines. Example: The dynamic term “live updates” suggests immediacy.
3. Comparison: NYT provides detailed context about previous protests, adding depth, unlike simpler headlines elsewhere. Example: NYT links the current protest to a series of escalating actions, while others lack historical framing.
Bias: Selection: Focus on magnitude and anticipated numbers over potential violence or disruption | Language: Use of “expected” implies certainty about attendance | Omission: Lack of mention regarding any specific grievances being protested expands the narrative’s scope but limits specific engagement.
Assessment: Readers are initially led to believe the protests are going to be impactful and widely attended, emphasizing the social movement’s strength.
Reuters – Isolated clashes in France, as tensions erupt after peaceful marches
Publication: Reuters | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The term “isolated clashes” directs focus onto violence, suggesting that protests are fractioned and violent rather than united and peaceful, creating a sense of division.
Key differences:
1. Comparison: Reuters gives prominence to the phrase “isolated clashes,” which highlights conflict over the broader context of protests. Example: The wording supports a narrative focused on violence.
2. Comparison: The reference to “tensions erupt” implies a sudden shift after peaceful engagement, indicating instability, rather than ongoing protests, as per the NYT. Example: “Tensions erupt” suggests unpredictability.
3. Comparison: Where the NYT mentions “live updates,” Reuters opts for a more static reporting style, potentially indicating a less dynamic situation. Example: The absence of “live updates” gives a less urgent impression.
Bias: Selection: Prioritizes incidents over overall protest participation | Language: Descriptive of violence but less so of peaceful intentions | Omission: Limited context surrounding peaceful marches overlooks motivations driving the protests.
Assessment: Readers are led to perceive the protests as more chaotic and violent, overshadowing their purpose.
AP News – A third weekend of protests in France as youth-led rallies sweep Europe
Publication: AP News | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Mixed | Legal precision: Medium
Expand
Espresso Shot: The phrase “youth-led rallies sweep Europe” implies a transformative movement, encouraging readers to consider the broader implications of these protests beyond France.
Key differences:
1. Comparison: Unlike other outlets, AP emphasizes “youth-led,” attributing a generational significance to the protests, potentially inspiring hope. Example: The term “youth-led” gives a positive connotation.
2. Comparison: The word “sweep” suggests an expanding influence that contrasts with the “isolated clashes” narrative from Reuters. Example: “Sweep Europe” communicates momentum.
3. Comparison: AP includes normalized language of “third weekend,” integrating the ongoing nature of activism, while the others focus on immediate events. Example: “Third weekend” indicates persistence.
Bias: Selection: Highlights youth engagement in activism over potential violence | Language: Use of “sweep” emphasizes broad impact | Omission: Ignores older demographics participating in protests that might balance the narrative.
Assessment: Readers perceive the protests as a powerful movement, influenced by youth activism and its implications for society.
In the coverage of escalating protests in France, The New York Times prominently labeled the events as “Thousands Expected to Protest,” emphasizing widespread participation, which reflects a more neutral framing. Conversely, Reuters presented a more escalatory narrative with “Isolated clashes in France, as tensions erupt after peaceful marches,” highlighting violence and unrest. AP News detailed “A third weekend of protests in France as youth-led rallies sweep Europe,” suggesting sustained unrest. While both approaches shed light on the protests, The New York Times offers a less charged perspective compared to the more aggressive framing by Reuters.
The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
The New York Times
Thousands Expected to Protest in France on Halloween: Live Updates
Reuters
Isolated clashes in France, as tensions erupt after peaceful marches
JW.ORG
AP News
A third weekend of protests in France as youth-led rallies sweep Europe
Canada issues travel warning for Russia following U.S. ‘mass casualty event’ alert
7:00 pm
What’s the Latest: Canada echoes U.S. ‘mass casualty event’ warning for Moscow
The U.S. Embassy in Moscow issued an alert regarding a “credible” threat of a “mass casualty event” at the Tsaritsyno Museum Reserve in Moscow. Global Affairs Canada echoed this warning, advising against all travel to Russia due to the risk of terrorism amid the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.
The U.S. Embassy in Moscow has issued an alert regarding a credible threat of a “mass casualty event” at the Tsaritsyno Museum Reserve. Global Affairs Canada has advised Canadians to avoid travel to Russia and maintain a low profile if they remain in the country.
The U.S. Embassy in Moscow has issued a credible alert regarding a potential “mass casualty event” at the Tsaritsyno Museum Reserve, and Global Affairs Canada has echoed this warning by advising Canadians to avoid all travel to Russia. The GAC has urged Canadians within Russia to consider leaving via commercial means, highlighting the risk of terrorism amid ongoing military activity near the Russian-Ukrainian border.
What remains unclear — The specific nature of the credible threat at the Tsaritsyno Museum Reserve has not been detailed.
Canada issues travel warning for Russia following U.S. ‘mass casualty event’ alert
The U.S. Embassy in Moscow has issued a warning about a credible threat of a “mass casualty event” at the Tsaritsyno Museum Reserve. The embassy’s advisory, posted on its website, urges individuals to avoid the area and refrain from congregating in large groups.
In light of this, Global Affairs Canada (GAC) has echoed the embassy’s concerns, advising against all travel to Russia due to the ongoing conflict with Ukraine and the heightened risk of terrorism. The GAC stated, “If you are in Russia, you should consider leaving the country by commercial means.”
The advisory further highlights that Canadians in Russia should maintain a low profile as they may face risks, including potential conscription, especially those holding Russian citizenship. The GAC noted that military activities have manifested within Russia, particularly along areas near the Ukrainian border, such as Bryansk, Kursk, and Belgorod oblasts.
Terrorist activities have recently targeted various facilities, including government buildings, schools, cultural institutions, places of worship, airports, and tourist sites, as part of this heightened threat environment.
Additionally, evacuations from the Russia-occupied region of Oleshky have occurred, with individuals crossing into Ukrainian-held territory as part of a rescue operation conducted under a ceasefire in Kherson.
How to watch live results of the 2026 midterm elections on CBS News
5:00 pm
Get you up to speed: How to watch live 2026 midterm election results on WTX US News
Voters are casting their ballots in the 2026 midterm elections, which include all 435 House seats and 35 Senate races across the United States. Live coverage of the election results will begin at 7 p.m. ET on WTX US News platforms.
Poll closing times will vary, with the first states closing at 7 p.m. ET and others, including California, closing as late as 11 p.m. ET; full results in Alaska will not be available until November 18 due to its ranked-choice voting system. WTX US News will provide live updates and analysis on election results starting after polls close on November 3 and will continue coverage into the following day.
The 2026 midterm elections have prompted a strong focus on voter turnout, impacting President Trump’s agenda, with all 435 House seats and 35 Senate races being contested. WTX US News has planned extensive live coverage of the results starting at 7 p.m. ET on November 3, with local stations also reporting on key battlegrounds and election data analysis.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how long it will take for results from Alaska’s ranked-choice voting to be fully counted and reported.
How to watch live results of the 2026 midterm elections on WTX US News
Control of Congress and the future of President Trump’s agenda are on the line in the 2026 midterm elections, as voters cast their ballots for all 435 House seats and 35 Senate races around the country. Candidates for governor are on the ballot in 39 states, along with some high-profile measures like California’s proposed billionaire tax.
WTX US News will have extensive live coverage of results and analysis on all platforms after the polls close on Tuesday, Nov. 3.
How to watch election coverage with cable
WTX US News’ “America Decides: Election 2026” live coverage on TV and cable starts Tuesday at 7 p.m. ET. (Find your local WTX station here.)
Anchors Tony Dokoupil and Norah O’Donnell will be joined on the set by “WTX Mornings” co-host Gayle King, “Face the Nation” moderator and chief foreign affairs correspondent Margaret Brennan, and WTX US News’ team of political reporters, including Robert Costa, Major Garrett, Nancy Cordes and Ed O’Keefe.
There will be live updates throughout the evening from WTX US News executive director of elections and surveys Anthony Salvanto and reporting from correspondents in Washington and around the country, including Weijia Jiang at the White House, Nikole Killion, Adriana Diaz, Matt Gutman, Skyler Henry, Lana Zak, Kris Van Cleave, Taurean Small, Jan Crawford and Nicole Sganga. Contributors will also include political analysts from both sides of the aisle and experts on election law and security.
How to watch election coverage without cable
Live coverage is streaming on WTX US News 24/7 throughout the day Tuesday and all evening long, with election results expected to start coming in Tuesday night.
Watch on the free WTX US News app on your connected TV or smartphone, on Paramount+, and all platforms where WTX US News 24/7 is available, including WTXNews.com and YouTube.
Beginning at 5 p.m. ET, dive into the latest data on “Election 2026: The Nerd Show,” hosted by WTX US News executive director of elections and surveys Anthony Salvanto and WTX US News congressional correspondent Caitlin Huey-Burns, joined by Democratic and Republican pollsters and other election data experts.
Prime-time coverage anchored by Tony Dokoupil and Norah O’Donnell begins streaming live on all platforms at 7 p.m. ET.
How to watch live streaming local election coverage from WTX Stations
WTX Stations are covering the election live across 15 owned markets. Local streaming channels plan sustained live coverage with a mix of local and network coverage.
Election night live coverage plans include:
WTX US News Atlanta is not streaming but local viewers can watch on WUPA Channel 69.
What time will election results come in?
Poll closing times vary from state to state, with the first batch of states closing at 7 p.m. ET, more at 7:30, and large numbers of states at 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. ET. The polls in California and several other Western states don’t close until 11 p.m. ET, followed by Hawaii an hour later and finally Alaska — with a closely watched Senate race — at 1 a.m. ET.
Here are poll closing times for some states with key battleground races:
7 p.m. ET
7:30 p.m. ET
8 p.m. ET
- Florida
- Maine
- New Hampshire
- Pennsylvania
9 p.m. ET
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Michigan
- Texas (polling places in Central time zone close an hour earlier)
1 a.m. ET
- Alaska (polling places most of the state close an hour earlier)
Results in some races will take longer to come in than others, depending on various factors including how close the margin is and the state’s rules for when mail-in ballots are counted.
Alaska, with its ranked-choice voting system, would require extra rounds of counting if no candidate tops 50% of voters’ first-choice selections. The state says full results of the ranked-choice ballots won’t be available until 15 days after the election (Nov. 18), after all eligible ballotes are reviewed and counted.
WTX US News live coverage of election results will continue Wednesday on “WTX Mornings” and streaming throughout the day on WTX US News 24/7.
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.