- Judge rules against DOJ’s state voter roll review policy, citing legality issues
- TV presenters flee during 7.7-magnitude earthquake on air in Panama
- European states, Canada, Japan and UN support ICC amid US sanctions
- Okanagan growers report crop insurance fails to address climate change risks
- Obama raises over £13 million for Democrats, emphasises voter action in November
- Suspect in murder of Ann Widdecombe linked to terrorist activities
- Teenager accused of school stabbing that left one pupil dead and eight injured in Istanbul
- Netherlands seeks safeguards for EU police data sharing with third countries
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Judge rules against DOJ’s state voter roll review policy, citing legality issues
Get you up to speed: Judge strikes down DOJ’s policy of reviewing state voter rolls, saying it would “run roughshod over longstanding laws”
A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration’s plan to verify state voter rolls against federal immigration databases. U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled that the Justice Department lacked the authority for this action, stating it violates existing laws protecting voter rights.
The Justice Department has lost nearly all lawsuits aimed at obtaining voter files from states, while 18 states have fully complied with the federal requests. The ruling limits the federal government’s role in verifying voter eligibility and prevents it from removing citizens from voter rolls based on perceived inaccuracies in federal databases.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan has been celebrated by advocacy group Common Cause, with CEO Virginia Kase Solomón calling it “a victory for voters and yet another loss for the Department of Justice.” The Justice Department has stated that it is reviewing the decision, indicating possible next steps in its ongoing efforts to obtain voter roll information from the states.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how the Justice Department will proceed following the ruling that halted their efforts to check state voter rolls against federal immigration databases.
Judge rules against DOJ’s state voter roll review policy, citing legality issues
A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration’s plan to check state voter rolls against federal immigration databases, a blow to the administration’s election-related efforts in the run-up to the midterms.
In a 78-page ruling, D.C.-based U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan wrote Friday that the Justice Department “cannot run roughshod over longstanding laws that were carefully crafted to protect the rights of the American people.”
The Trump administration has mounted a nationwide push to obtain complete voter rolls from every state, including sensitive information about registered voters. The Justice Department has argued the information is needed to ensure states are complying with two federal voting laws — the Help America Vote Act and the National Voter Registration Act — which aim to ensure states have programs in place for maintaining accurate voter rolls.
Eighteen states fully cooperated with the Justice Department’s request for voter files, Sooknanan said. The department has brought lawsuits against most other states, and has lost almost all of the suits, according to a WTX US News analysis. One state settled with the federal government.
The ruling applies to the voter files that the Justice Department has already received, as well as the files it is still litigating over.
Sooknanan rejected the Justice Department’s argument that it has legal authority to demand voter lists, compare those lists against citizenship databases and urge states to remove voters who it claims are ineligible to vote. The judge also said the policy violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Privacy Act, and said the federal databases could contain “inaccuracies.”
“Today’s decision does not prevent the federal government from taking lawful steps to support states’ efforts to maintain accurate voter rolls. Neither does it prevent states from maintaining their own voter rolls. And to state the obvious, the Court’s decision does not pave the way for ineligible voters to vote in our elections,” Sooknanan wrote. “Rather, the Court vacates a policy that has removed United States citizens from the voter rolls in their home states and risks disenfranchising many more — a policy that flies in the face of duly enacted laws designed to protect Americans.”
She continued: “The challenged policy represents the federal government’s attempt to decide who gets to vote. But Congress has left that authority where our Constitution has always placed it: with the states.”
The legal challenge against the voter roll policy was brought by advocacy group Common Cause and individual voters.
Common Cause CEO Virginia Kase Solomón called the ruling “a victory for voters and yet another loss for the Department of Justice” in a statement Friday.
A Justice Department spokesperson said the agency is reviewing the decision.
Under the Trump administration, the federal government has sought a larger-than-usual role in elections, which are typically administered by states with some regulation by Congress. President Trump argues more federal scrutiny is necessary in order to prevent noncitizens from voting and curb fraud — though most election experts say fraud and noncitizen voting are extremely rare.
The government’s push to run state voter rolls through the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database has faced court setbacks, as more than two dozen judges have denied the Justice Department’s requests to compel individual states to share their voter lists.
Sooknanan also ruled in June that the Trump administration’s overhauled SAVE database — which includes data from the Social Security Administration — was created unlawfully. The Supreme Court temporarily paused that ruling last month.
In practice, the impact of recent court rulings on the November midterms could be limited as federal law bars states from systematically removing ineligible voters from their voter registration lists within 90 days of an election.
Another Trump administration policy that set new rules for the U.S. Postal Service’s handling of mail-in ballots was also blocked in the courts, with the Supreme Court declining the government’s request to allow the rules to take effect.
TV presenters flee during 7.7-magnitude earthquake on air in Panama
Get you up to speed: TV presenters run for their lives when 7.7-magnitude earthquake strikes mid-show | News World
A 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck southern Panama shortly before 3pm at a depth of 10km, with its epicentre located 6.2 miles from Pitaloza Arriba. Panamanian authorities reported damage to several buildings and an ongoing power outage across six provinces, while a tsunami alert was issued, affecting nearby countries.
The US Geological Survey confirmed the earthquake struck at a depth of 10 kilometres, with its epicentre located near Pitaloza Arriba, approximately 6.2 miles from the small town. The Panamanian government reported significant damage to several structures, including the St John Baptist Cathedral, with around a dozen buildings collapsing and power outages affecting six provinces.
Panama’s civil protection agency confirmed that numerous buildings were damaged and about a dozen structures collapsed following the earthquake, while Omar Smith stated that impacts were reported in Chitre and the coast of Los Santos province. Power outages affected six provinces, flights were suspended at Tocumen International Airport, and schools across the nation halted classes as residents expressed widespread fear and concern amid continued aftershocks.
What remains unclear — The full extent of the earthquake’s destruction and potential casualties have not yet been confirmed.
TV presenters flee during 7.7-magnitude earthquake on air in Panama
This is the terrifying moment a group of TV presenters fled to safety as a 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck while they were on air.
The major quake hit southern Panama at a depth of 10km, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS), shortly before 3pm.
Its epicentre was 6.2 miles from the small town of Pitaloza Arriba, which is near Panama’s southern tip.
A wide-ranging tsunami alert was issued as a result, with the USGS warning that the damage was ‘likely to be widespread’.
It was said that tsunamis could have been triggered in Colombia, Costa Rica, Chile, and Mexico.
Approximately 4.6 million people felt moderate to severe shaking amid the quake, five of whom were on live television at the time.
Sign up for all of the latest stories

Many buildings were damaged by the 7.7-magnitude earthquake in Panama City (Picture: EPA)

People gathered outside as warnings were issued for potential tsunamis (Picture: Xinhua/Shutterstock)
The broadcasters were chatting on the station RPC Televisión when they noticed a change in the weather and looked around in confusion.
Seemingly filming in a restaurant, one of the hosts grabbed onto the bar as the winds picked up.
Suddenly, everything started shaking violently, and glasses could be heard falling off shelves and shattering.
Realising the incident was serious, all five hosts put down their microphones and darted out of view, one covering his head as he ran.
With the camera still focused on the set, light fittings began swaying aggressively while bottles and plants were thrown to the floor.
The full extent of the earthquake’s destruction has not yet been confirmed, nor is it known whether there have been casualties.

Vehicles were also hit by the debris (Picture: EPA)

About 4.6 million people felt moderate to severe shaking (Picture: Martin Bernetti/AFP via Getty Images)
Panamanian authorities have confirmed that several buildings, including the St John Baptist Cathedral and a local church, were damaged and around a dozen structures collapsed.
Meanwhile, Omar Smith, who heads Panama’s civil protection agency, told Telemetro Reporta that impacts had been reported in Chitre, the capital of Herrera, and along the coast in Los Santos province.
Power was down across six provinces, according to electricity provider Naturgy, and flights were suspended by Tocumen International Airport.
Schools suspended classes nationwide, too, with students pouring out onto the streets after being let out early.
Elderly residents were also seen in tears on the streets after evacuating as shallow aftershocks continued to rattle.
‘We’re scared. It’s just the two of us old folks here. The house has cracked, and we’re afraid it could fall on us,’ Ricardo Brown, 74, told Reuters from Herrera province in southern Panama.

Many people’s homes were damaged by the quake (Picture: Arnulfo Franco/AFP via Getty Images)

It hit southern Panama at a depth of 10km (Picture: Daniel De Carteret/AFP via Getty Images)
He also noted that many homes had been damaged.
Another resident, Luke, counted 40 seconds of vibrations in Panama City, and Sabina Rios, who was on the sixth floor of an old US military-era building, said: ‘The quake felt strong and lasted a long time, the longest I’ve felt in years.’
The director of Panama’s geosciences institute, Nestor Luque, explained that long-built-up pressure in the Azuero Sona Fault System led to the earthquake.
‘It’s a system of active faults that occasionally, due to the accumulation of stress, release this amount of energy,’ he said.
‘The seismic signals have travelled throughout the national territory, and that is why it could be felt everywhere.’
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
European states, Canada, Japan and UN support ICC amid US sanctions
Get you up to speed: European states, Canada, Japan and UN back ICC against US sanctions
The United States has imposed sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC), announced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which will ban transactions with the court. In response, several US allies, including Britain, Canada, and Japan, expressed regret and disagreement with the sanctions, emphasising the potential impact on the court’s operations.
The US Treasury Department’s sanctions against the International Criminal Court come with a six-month initial grace period, allowing certain transactions to continue, including telecommunications and pension payments. Meanwhile, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has expressed deep concern regarding the sanctions’ potential impact on the court’s ability to fulfil its mandate.
European leaders and UN officials have expressed strong disapproval of the US sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC), with a joint statement from the foreign ministers of Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, and Japan stating they “regret and strongly disagree” with the move. In response, Belgium’s Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot announced plans to discuss protective measures for the ICC at upcoming European Union meetings, advocating for the activation of the EU Blocking Statute to mitigate the sanctions’ impact.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain how effectively other nations will implement protective measures for the ICC in response to the US sanctions.
European states, Canada, Japan and UN support ICC amid US sanctions
News|ICCEuropean states, Canada, Japan and UN back ICC against US sanctions
Several US allies call to ‘defend’ and ‘protect’ the ICC following Washington’s decision to sanction the judiciary body.
Published On 9 Oct 20269 Oct 2026
The United States has imposed a new set of sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC), prompting several countries – including US allies – to condemn the move and reiterate their support for the world’s war crimes tribunal.
On Friday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that Washington would be banning transactions with the “rogue court, cutting off their resources and crippling its ability to operate”, adding that President Donald Trump would “never allow” the Hague to prosecute Americans.
The ICC was created in 2002 to prosecute individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity when national authorities are unable or unwilling to do so.
The US Treasury Department announced the penalties with a six-month initial grace period and other exemptions that would allow some transactions for telecommunications, software, pension payments and transactions related to detainees.
Rubio said the sanctions would give the court and its member states an opportunity to address US concerns and would be adjusted if they did not meet those demands.
The Trump administration says the court has exceeded its authority by pursuing officials from countries that are not ICC members, such as Israel. The United States and Israel have never joined the court.
In response to the sanctions, the ICC said that the move was an “assault on the rule of law and on the very foundations of the international legal order”. It called on its 125 member states to defend the institution.
“The Court cannot stand alone. Its fate now rests also in the hands of the states that created it,” the ICC said in a statement. “This is not just about defending a single institution, but about safeguarding the international order grounded upon the rule of law. History will judge this moment.”
The Trump administration sanctioned more than a dozen judges and prosecutors before issuing sanctions on the court itself Friday.
Allies ‘regret and disagree’ with US move
Soon after the US announcement, top United Nations officials condemned the move.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was “deeply alarmed” by the expected impact of the sanctions on the court as a whole, particularly its ability to carry out its mandate, a statement from his spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said.
“Today’s decision marks a serious blow to our collective pursuit of international criminal justice, of which the ICC is a key pillar,” the statement added.
UN Human Rights chief Volker Turk called for immediate measures to protect the ICC. “These sanctions – the latest in a series of retaliatory steps against the ICC and its personnel for the work they do every day to advance accountability for the very worst violations of human rights – are unacceptable,” he said.
ICC member states that are US allies also expressed dismay at the decision.
Dutch Foreign Minister Tom Berendsen, whose country hosts the ICC, said the US’s decision was “deeply regrettable”.
“We will stand firm in defence of the court. At the same time, it’s important to note that the sanctions will not take effect immediately and that service providers can continue to work for the ICC. The six-month period before the sanctions take effect creates scope for dialogue,” he said.
In a joint statement, the foreign ministers of Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada and Japan said they “regret and strongly disagree” with the sanctions.
“If put into effect, these sanctions will have a significant impact on the Court’s work, its dedicated staff and their families … We remain both united in our support for the ICC and committed to engaging in constructive and inclusive dialogue with non-States Parties,” they said.
Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot also said Brussels would discuss support for the ICC with European Union foreign affairs colleagues on Monday and at the upcoming European Council.
“We will press for concrete protection. The court’s independence cannot depend on whom it investigates. Europe must act. Belgium is calling for the activation of the EU Blocking Statute to protect the court,” Prevot said.
US aims to ‘ultimately destroy’ ICC
Similarly, organisations and rights groups sounded the alarm over the implications of the US decision.
Philippe Bolopion, executive director of US-based Human Rights Watch, said the Trump administration had made clear its aim to “destroy” the ICC and “shield US and Israeli officials from facing charges before the court”.
“The ICC was created to ensure that no one, no matter how powerful, is above the law. Governments that value human rights and accountability should condemn this outrageous move and take swift action to protect the ICC, its staff, and all those who cooperate with it, starting with the European Union using its laws to mitigate the sanctions’ impact in the region,” he said.
The Executive Director of the Open Society Justice Initiative, James Goldston, said the sanctions were a “calculated attack on the rule of law and the principles of judicial independence and equality that underpin it.”
“This is the latest move in a campaign of coercion intended to destroy the system of international justice,” he said.
Amnesty International called on countries to “resist”. Trump’s “sanctions are designed to isolate and ultimately destroy the International Criminal Court”, Erika Guevara Rosas, Amnesty’s senior director for research, policy, advocacy and campaigns, said in a statement. “This existential attack must fail. States must take concrete action to resist the imposition of these measures.”
Amid widespread criticism, Israel commended the US move.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the sanctions and praised Trump and Rubio for taking this “critical decision”.
“The ICC is not a court. It is a political body that poses a mortal threat to law-abiding democracies worldwide and to the very idea of national sovereignty,” Netanyahu wrote on X.
In 2024 the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu on war crimes and crimes against humanity charges for the war on Gaza.
Okanagan growers report crop insurance fails to address climate change risks
Get you up to speed: Okanagan growers say crop insurance isn’t keeping up with a changing climate
Extreme weather has impacted crops, rendering grapes unsellable. Specific incidents of heat, cold, drought, hail, or wildfire smoke were reported affecting agricultural output.
Investigators are currently assessing the impact of extreme weather events on agricultural yields and market viability for grape producers. The analysis aims to establish a clearer timeline of weather-related disruptions affecting crop health throughout the growing season.
Officials have warned that extreme weather conditions pose a significant threat to crop yields, particularly in the viticulture sector, which could impact market availability. Agricultural leaders are expected to implement new adaptive measures to mitigate the risks associated with these climate challenges in the upcoming growing season.
What remains unclear — It is not specified which specific weather event has the most significant impact on crop viability.
Okanagan growers report crop insurance fails to address climate change risks

The weather can bring extreme heat, cold, drought, hail or wildfire smoke, and any one of those can wipe out a crop or make grapes impossible to sell.
Obama raises over £13 million for Democrats, emphasises voter action in November
Get you up to speed: Obama raises more than $13 million for Democrats, urges voters to “turn hope into action” at ballot box in November
Former President Barack Obama launched a new series of digital ads for the Democratic National Committee, promoting voter turnout and grassroots fundraising efforts. The six-figure ad campaign is part of Obama’s broader activities to support Democratic candidates leading up to the elections, including campaigning for Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan on October 24.
Barack Obama has endorsed several key Democratic candidates this election cycle, with campaign events scheduled in Michigan on October 24. The Democratic National Committee has engaged in a six-figure ad campaign aimed at enhancing voter turnout and grassroots fundraising efforts.
Former President Barack Obama is revitalising his “hope” campaign message in a series of digital ads for the Democratic National Committee, aimed at energising voter turnout ahead of the upcoming elections. DNC Chair Ken Martin stated, “President Obama’s support will motivate and mobilize voters in the home stretch,” while Obama himself is set to campaign in Michigan for Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed on October 24.
What remains unclear — It is not specified what additional campaign activities Obama will participate in beyond the Michigan event on October 24.
Obama raises over £13 million for Democrats, emphasises voter action in November
Washington — He still calls himself the “hope guy.” Former President Barack Obama, who ran on “hope and change,” is resurrecting his signature campaign slogan in a new series of digital ads for the Democratic National Committee that were viewed exclusively by WTX US News.
“I’ll be honest with you: I never imagined some of the stuff that’s been going on in our country lately,” Obama said in a direct-to-camera message. “But I am energized by the millions of Americans who are taking a stand and demanding change, even when it’s hard. That’s what hope is all about.”
During one 52-second spot, the former president never mentions President Trump by name but opines about the difficulties of the last two years and urges Democrats to “win one of the most consequential elections in our country’s history.”
“The most powerful office in this country has always been ‘citizen,'” Obama stated. “And right now, every one of us can help turn hope into action.”
The six-figure ad buy across platforms is aimed at supporting the DNC’s mobilization efforts, driving voter turnout and boosting grassroots fundraising, according to a DNC official.
“Democrats are heading into November with the wind at our backs and momentum on our side, but we’re not taking anything for granted,” DNC Chair Ken Martin said in a statement to WTX US News. “President Obama’s support will motivate and mobilize voters in the home stretch and help Democrats across the country win in races up and down the ballot.”
As one of the party’s leading surrogates, WTX US News has learned the former president has raised more than $13.6 million for Democrats through roughly half a dozen finance events and direct mail campaigns for the DNC and party committees since last year. That includes raking in more than $3.6 million this week at a fundraiser he headlined for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Northern Virginia.
“There are states right now in play that I would not have imagined being in play,” Obama told donors during a fireside chat Wednesday night, according to excerpts provided to WTX US News. “If you had told me that the polling currently shows James Talarico ahead of Ken Paxton — now, Paxton helps. And James is an outstanding candidate. But if had you told me that he was going to be up in the polls this late, I would have said, ‘eh, I don’t think so.'”
“The point is, the reason I’m saying this is I don’t want anyone to think this is a sure thing,” he continued. “But we have a chance.”
Over the past several days, Obama has made endorsements in key Senate races from Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff to Maine Democratic Senate nominee Troy Jackson. He also backed several gubernatorial candidates including Wisconsin’s David Crowley, Georgia’s Keisha Lance Bottoms, New Mexico’s Deb Haaland and Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro. The ads were among nearly two dozen he recently taped for Democratic candidates. In past cycles, the former president has also recorded robocalls for House candidates.
Obama is also expected to hit the campaign trail with additional activities likely to be announced in the coming days. One of those stops includes Michigan, where he will campaign with Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed on Oct. 24.
“I’m going to go to Michigan to campaign for Abdul El-Sayed,” Obama said at Wednesday’s fundraiser. “And people are like, ‘Well, he’s really left wing.’ But I don’t know — he’s for a higher minimum wage and healthcare for all, and it doesn’t seem crazy to me. You know, FDR was for that, too.”
Earlier this year, Obama appeared with other candidates, shooting hoops with Josh Turek in Iowa and getting tacos in Texas with Talarico and gubernatorial nominee Gina Hinojosa. His strategy this fall is centered around where he can “move the needle” with Democrats and persuadable voters, according to his office.
That approach is on full display in his latest ad.
“Use that hope to make a difference,” he said. “Get involved.”
In:
Suspect in murder of Ann Widdecombe linked to terrorist activities
Get you up to speed: Suspect in Ann Widdecombe murder and Nigel Farage plot is ‘left-wing terrorist’ | News UK
Joshua Kerry, 28, has been charged with preparation of terrorist acts and the murder of Ann Widdecombe at her home in Haytor, Devon. The court heard that Ms Widdecombe, a 78-year-old Reform UK spokeswoman, was attacked with a hammer on July 8, 2026, in an incident lasting approximately two minutes.
Investigators discovered evidence on Joshua Kerry’s phone indicating he researched the home and office addresses of several prominent figures, including Ann Widdecombe and Nigel Farage, over a period of two years. A trial has been scheduled for 8 June 2028, with a plea and case management hearing set for 29 January 2028.
The Crown alleges that Joshua Kerry held extreme left-wing views and was particularly hostile towards the Reform party, with prosecutor Jonathan Polnay KC stating that the murder of Ann Widdecombe had a “terrorist connection.” A trial has been scheduled for June 8 with a plea and case management hearing set for January 29.
What remains unclear — It is not clear what specific evidence links Kerry’s alleged research to the planned attack on Mr Farage.
Suspect in murder of Ann Widdecombe linked to terrorist activities
The man accused of murdering Ann Widdecombe and targeting Nigel Farage’s home held extreme left-wing views and was ‘particularly hostile’ towards Reform, the Old Bailey heard today.
Joshua Kerry, 28, appeared charged with preparation of terrorist acts between May 31, 2024, and July 8, 2026, the day he allegedly killed Ms Widdecombe.
The Reform UK spokeswoman and former Tory minister, 78, was hit over the head with a hammer 21 times in the kitchen of her home in Haytor on Dartmoor, Devon.
The attack lasted just two minutes, the court heard.
Before that, Kerry is said to have spent nearly two years researching prominent people and institutions.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
He is alleged to have tried to gain entry to the south London home of Mr Farage as part of a suspected firebomb attack on April 19 last year.
Following his arrest investigators found a list including the names of Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, and Reform MPs Richard Tice, Lee Anderson and Robert Jenrick, it is said.
On Friday, Kerry, of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, appeared for a hearing before Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb.
The senior judge set a trial before a High Court judge on June 8 and a plea and case management hearing on January 29.
Prosecutor Jonathan Polnay KC said the Crown alleges Kerry held extreme left-wing and or anti-establishment views and was ‘particularly hostile’ towards the Reform party.
He told the court the murder of Ms Widdecombe had a ‘terrorist connection’ and was ‘inextricably linked’ to Kerry’s earlier activities.
Outlining the allegations, Mr Polnay said: ‘The prosecution case is that on July 8, 2026, the defendant drove 265 miles from his home in Rotherham to Ann Widdecombe’s home in Devon where he murdered her.
‘He drove there in a Vauxhall Corsa with a hammer and gloves then gained access to Ms Widdecombe’s home and went into the kitchen where Ms Widdecombe was having lunch and struck her 21 times, killing her.
‘He was in the address for approximately two minutes before leaving and driving away. He was arrested by police on July 11, 2026.’
Kerry was later linked by investigators to an earlier incident at the south London home of Reform leader Mr Farage on April 19 last year.
Mr Farage’s partner Laure Ferrari had returned home to find damage to a front door and a bottle of lighter fluid in the porch, the court was told.
A mark on the door was said to have been made by a 27mm blade edge which Mr Polnay suggested ‘clearly represented an attempt to get inside the house’.
Police also uncovered alleged evidence on a phone of research into the home and office addresses of a number of political and prominent figures between May 31, 2024 and July 8, including those of Ms Widdecombe and Mr Farage.
A note on the defendant’s phone allegedly contained the list of politicians and prominent figures, the court was told.
Mr Polnay said an analysis of Kerry’s phone suggested an ‘extreme left-wing and/or anti-establishment mindset’.
Nicholas Lumley KC, defending, told the court that Kerry was likely to contest all the charges against him.
Wearing a grey tracksuit, the bearded defendant spoke only to confirm his identity during the hearing.
Add as preferred source
Breaking News
Never miss the biggest stories with breaking news alerts in your inbox.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.










