Latest News
- Nigel Farage Denied Entry to Chagos Islands Amid Strict UK Border Controls
- Euronews Launches New Morning Programme at 8 AM Brussels Time
- Supreme Court Strikes Down Most of Trump’s Tariffs: Economic Implications Ahead
- Prince Andrew Arrested: Inquiry Deepens into Epstein Connections
- Jamie Carragher singles out Liverpool ‘game-changer’ after win over Nottingham Forest
- Russia launches heavy bombing campaign on Ukraine, injuring 15 on Monday
- Man in his 40s fatally stabbed in bustling Wimbledon high street
- AI Candidate Gaitana Aims for Indigenous Seat in Colombia’s 2026 Elections
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
Nigel Farage Denied Entry to Chagos Islands Amid Strict UK Border Controls
9:08 pm
Get you up to speed: Nigel Farage Denied Entry to Chagos Islands Amid Strict UK Border Controls
Nigel Farage was refused entry to the Chagos Islands after travelling nearly 6,000 miles to the restricted military base. He stated that he had been blocked by the UK government from delivering aid to support four Chagossians aiming to colonise a deserted island. Foreign Office advice indicates that anyone wishing to travel to the archipelago requires a permit, with no commercial flights operating to or from the territory.
Nigel Farage was denied entry to the Chagos Islands after attempting to deliver aid to Chagossians, with the UK government allegedly requesting the Maldives government to prevent his departure, according to Farage. The Foreign Office has stated that all visitors to the British Indian Ocean Territory must obtain a permit prior to travel. Ben Wallace, former defence secretary, criticised Farage’s actions, asserting that no MP can access sensitive military bases without proper clearance.
Nigel Farage was denied entry to the Chagos Islands after he attempted to deliver aid for four Chagossians aiming to colonise a deserted island. The UK government instructed the Maldives government to prevent him from leaving for the islands, citing that a permit is required for all visitors to the British Indian Ocean Territory. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has reversed his stance on the deal to transfer the territory to Mauritius, urging the UK government not to “give away Diego Garcia.”
What we know so far
Nigel Farage turned away from Chagos Islands by strict border controls | News World
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video
Nigel Farage has long been a staunch advocate for strong borders and curbing migration.
However, it was the Reform UK leader’s turn to face border controls when he was refused entry to the Chagos Islands this weekend after travelling nearly 6,000 miles to the restricted military base.
In a video shared on social media, Mr Farage said he was on a mission to bring aid to support four Chagossians aiming to colonise a deserted island.
Mr Farage, 51, had attempted to arrive by boat at Ile du Coin from the Maldives, 300 miles away, on Saturday.
The Reform leader insisted he had been told by a ‘senior figure’ that he had been blocked by the UK government from delivering the food and medicine.
He said: ‘The British government has made every effort to prevent me heading towards the Chagos Islands. They have asked the Maldives government to stop me from leaving here and setting foot on the boat.
Nigel Farage was blocked from arriving at the Chagos Islands on Saturday (Picture: Nigel_Farage/X)
‘This was information conveyed to me by a senior figure in the Maldives government. I cannot believe such an attempt has been made to stop a British citizen from reaching British territory.’
However, according to Foreign Office advice, anyone wishing to travel to the archipelago, home to a joint UK-US military base, requires a permit, with no commercial flights operating to or from the territory.
Ben Wallace, the former defence secretary, accused Mr Farage of attempting ‘MAGA stunts’.
He wrote on X: ‘No Mr Farage you cant just turn up at sensitive military bases either in the UK or abroad.
‘No MP can – no matter what Party you represent. We don’t do open days around the trident warhead or open house for the SAS either.’
Sir Ben further hit out at Mr Farage for failing to recruit a defence spokesperson after the Reform leader unveiled a ‘shadow cabinet’ of comprised of senior party figures, including Richard Tice and Conservative defector Robert Jenrick.
United States military base in the middle of the Indian Ocean leased from Britain in 1966. REUTERS/HO/U.S. Navy/File Photo” decoding=”async” loading=”lazy”/>
All visitors to the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) require a permit before travelling (Picture: Reuters)
It comes days after Donald Trump again turned on the government’s deal to hand over what is formally known as the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) to Mauritius.
The US president had previously suggested the deal was the ‘best’ Sir Keir Starmer could have negotiated.
However Trump changed his mind this again this week, urging the government not to ‘give away Diego Garcia’.
Reports suggested that the president was swayed by the UK’s refusal to allow US forces to use RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire as a base for a potential military campaign against Iran.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX News as a Preferred Source on Google
Euronews Launches New Morning Programme at 8 AM Brussels Time
9:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Trump’s Board of Peace Holds First Meeting
The first meeting of Trump’s Board of Peace took place recently. This meeting marks a significant step in the organisation’s efforts to promote global peace initiatives.
Reactions to the meeting have been mixed, with some expressing optimism while others remain sceptical of its impact. Critics have raised concerns regarding the effectiveness of the Board’s proposed strategies.
Moving forward, the Board plans to unveil specific peace initiatives aimed at various global conflicts. This could influence diplomatic efforts in ongoing crises.
What we know so far
Europe Today: First meeting of Trump’s Board of Peace; interview with the 5th President of Georgia
The inaugural meeting of Trump’s Board of Peace has been held, focusing on global peace initiatives. According to reports, the Board aims to address various conflicts around the world.
Reactions to the meeting reveal a split in public opinion; while some applaud the efforts, others question the Board’s ability to effect real change. Critics have expressed doubts about the impact of the proposed strategies.
Looking ahead, the Board is expected to announce specific peace initiatives in the coming weeks. These initiatives will target ongoing global conflicts, potentially influencing future diplomatic interactions.
The outcome of this meeting could serve as a bellwether for the Board’s effectiveness in promoting peace globally.
Supreme Court Strikes Down Most of Trump’s Tariffs: Economic Implications Ahead
8:02 pm
Supreme Court Strikes Down Most of Trump’s Tariffs: Economic Implications Ahead
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled to invalidate most of former President Donald Trump’s tariffs, a decision that significantly alters the landscape of U.S. trade policy. These tariffs, which had been imposed on various imports, were deemed overreaching by the Court, citing a lack of statutory authority to implement them under the previous administration.
This ruling may have broad implications for American businesses and consumers who have been affected by the increased costs associated with these tariffs. Experts indicate that the reversal could lead to a reduction in higher prices for goods, potentially influencing both the domestic market and international trade relations.
Quick links:
What we know so far |
How US outlets are framing the story |
Additional news sources in the US
What we know so far
The Supreme Court recently ruled to invalidate a significant portion of former President Donald Trump’s tariffs, citing that they were imposed without proper legal authorization. The decision has substantial implications for U.S. trade policy, potentially affecting costs for consumers and businesses that had borne the burden of these tariffs. This ruling is expected to reshape trade relationships and economic strategies moving forward.
In response, trade officials have stated that the U.S. tariff policy remains unchanged despite the Court’s ruling. They emphasized their commitment to overseeing trade practices while continuing to balance national interests and international trade partnerships. This ongoing tension reflects broader considerations surrounding U.S. economic policies and international relations.
Confirmed details
- The Supreme Court invalidated most of Donald Trump’s tariffs.
- The ruling impacts a range of tariffs imposed during his administration.
- Legal challenges were initiated by affected international trade parties.
- The decision is expected to affect U.S. trade relations and economic policies.
- The ruling signals a significant shift in U.S. tariff policy.
- Trade officials maintain that the core U.S. tariff policies remain unchanged.
What remains unclear
- Uncertainty about the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on existing tariffs.
- Lack of clarity regarding future trade policies following the ruling.
- Potential impact on US interest rates remains unspecified.
- Details on how other countries will respond to this ruling are unclear.
- Responses from economic experts on the long-term effects are not provided.
- Specifics about the legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decision are absent.
How US outlets are framing the story
Supreme Court invalidates most of Donald Trump’s tariffs
Publication: CNN | Sentiment: Neutral (0.0) | Framing intensity: 5/10
Presentation: The article outlines the Supreme Court’s decision regarding tariffs imposed by former President Trump, focusing on the legal implications and the court’s rationale. It includes commentary from legal experts and government officials about the ruling’s impact on trade policy.
Angles and emphasis: CNN presents the story with an informative tone, emphasizing procedural aspects and the implications for future trade practices, as well as reactions from key political figures.
Supreme Court conservatives were united against Biden. Here’s why they split against Trump
Publication: The Washington Post | Sentiment: Neutral (0.0) | Framing intensity: 4/10
Presentation: This piece analyzes the contrasting judicial approaches of conservative justices on the Supreme Court, focusing particularly on their decisions involving Biden versus Trump. It includes insights into the dynamics within the court and different judicial philosophies.
Angles and emphasis: The Washington Post focuses on the internal conflicts within the Supreme Court, providing a detailed analysis on judicial decision-making processes, rather than simply reporting on the rulings.
US tariff policy ‘hasn’t changed’ despite supreme court ruling, trade chief says
Publication: The Guardian | Sentiment: Neutral (0.1) | Framing intensity: 3/10
Presentation: This article features statements from trade officials asserting that U.S. tariff policies remain consistent despite the recent Supreme Court ruling. It emphasizes continuity in trade strategy and includes reactions from industry stakeholders.
Angles and emphasis: The Guardian adopts a straightforward approach, reflecting official perspectives while incorporating industry reactions, maintaining a balanced tone without delving into sensationalism.
Opinion | Stand back, Congress needs a second Supreme Court jolt
Publication: The Washington Post | Sentiment: Negative (-0.5) | Framing intensity: 8/10
Presentation: The opinion piece critiques congressional inaction regarding Supreme Court reform, arguing for serious shifts in structure and philosophy. It positions this current moment as urgent, calling for significant changes in legislative approach.
Angles and emphasis: This article employs strong language and a critical tone, emphasizing perceived failures of Congress and the need for reform, contrasting sharply with more neutral reports on similar topics.
Additional news sources in the US
The Guardian
Supreme Court invalidates most of Donald Trump’s tariffs
The Guardian
Trump’s trade war risks undermining his hopes of hefty US interest rate cuts | Graeme Wearden
CNN
Supreme Court conservatives were united against Biden. Here’s why they split against Trump
The Washington Post
Opinion | Stand back, Congress needs a second Supreme Court jolt
The Guardian
US tariff policy ‘hasn’t changed’ despite supreme court ruling, trade chief says
Prince Andrew Arrested: Inquiry Deepens into Epstein Connections
7:01 pm
Prince Andrew Arrested: Inquiry Deepens into Epstein Connections
Former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has reportedly been arrested in relation to ongoing investigations linked to financial irregularities and potential criminal activity. The arrest, taking place at Royal Lodge in Windsor, is part of a broader inquiry into alleged connections with known offenders and involves extensive searches of the property.
Authorities have indicated that the investigation may expand further, with a focus on any relevant financial transactions involving the Duke of York. This development adds another layer to the scrutiny surrounding his past associations, particularly those linked to Jeffrey Epstein, as police continue their inquiries.
Quick links:
What we know so far |
How UK outlets are framing the story |
Additional UK News sources
What we know so far
Former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has reportedly been arrested in connection with ongoing investigations into his links to Jeffrey Epstein. This action follows a series of inquiries into financial dealings and potential criminal activities. Andrew’s home, the Royal Lodge in Windsor, was searched by police as part of these enquiries.
Members of Parliament have expressed calls for further scrutiny, including discussions about a potential treason investigation. The authorities are looking into connections between Andrew and Epstein, who was previously convicted of sex trafficking. As investigations continue, the implications for Andrew and the royal family are being closely monitored.
Confirmed details
- Former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested.
- The arrest is part of an investigation into his links with Jeffrey Epstein.
- Police are conducting searches at the Royal Lodge.
- An inquiry into Andrew’s association with Epstein has not been ruled out.
- Public calls for further investigation have increased.
- The situation has significant implications for the Royal Family.
What remains unclear
- The current status of Prince Andrew’s legal situation is not clear.
- Specific charges against Prince Andrew are not confirmed or detailed.
- The extent of any police investigations into Epstein links remains ambiguous.
- Details on the potential outcomes from ongoing legal actions are not disclosed.
- The responses from government officials regarding potential charges are inconsistent.
How UK outlets are framing the story
Inquiry into Andrew’s Epstein links not ruled out as police searches continue
Publication: The Guardian | Sentiment: Neutral (0.10) | Framing intensity: 5/10
Presentation: The Guardian reports on ongoing investigations surrounding Andrew and his connections with Epstein, highlighting that inquiries into these links are still active as police conduct searches. The piece maintains a factual tone while detailing the circumstances.
Angles and bias: This coverage focuses on the procedural aspect of the investigation without sensationalism, contrasting other outlets that may emphasise more dramatic consequences.
Andrew is Prince William’s problem too – and it makes his future job harder
Publication: BBC | Sentiment: Neutral (0.15) | Framing intensity: 4/10
Presentation: The BBC piece discusses the implications of Andrew’s controversies for Prince William, framing it as a challenge rather than a crisis. The report provides analysis without excessive drama.
Angles and bias: The tone remains restrained and analytical, focusing on royal dynamics, whereas other reports may exaggerate the stakes involved.
Andrew latest: ‘Look at the money trail’ – Royal biographer on what could come next for ex-duke and Sarah Ferguson over Epstein links
Publication: Sky News | Sentiment: Negative (-0.45) | Framing intensity: 7/10
Presentation: Sky News explores potential repercussions for Andrew and Sarah Ferguson in relation to financial ties with Epstein, using quotes from experts to emphasise the gravity of the situation. The report conveys a sense of urgency.
Angles and bias: The outlet leans into the potential scandal aspect, providing a more charged narrative compared to others that focus on procedural details.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor latest: MP calls for treason probe as Royal Lodge searches continue
Publication: The Independent | Sentiment: Negative (-0.60) | Framing intensity: 8/10
Presentation: The Independent covers escalating demands for investigation into Andrew’s activities amidst searches at his residence, articulating strong public sentiment and political moves towards accountability.
Angles and bias: This report features a more dramatic tone compared to others, highlighting the treason probe aspect, which may create a sense of heightened stakes.
Additional news sources from the UK
The Guardian
Inquiry into Andrew’s Epstein links not ruled out as police searches continue
BBC
Andrew is Prince William’s problem too – and it makes his future job harder
The Independent
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor latest: MP calls for treason probe as Royal Lodge searches continue
Jamie Carragher singles out Liverpool ‘game-changer’ after win over Nottingham Forest
5:00 pm
Jamie Carragher singles out Liverpool ‘game-changer’ after win over Nottingham Forest | Football
TL;DR – Two-minute read
Liverpool secured a tense 1-0 victory over Nottingham Forest, courtesy of Alexis Mac Allister’s last-minute goal. The match, held at the City Ground, witnessed Jamie Carragher praising 17-year-old Rio Ngumoha for his impactful performance following his substitution. This victory marked Liverpool’s third consecutive win in all competitions, elevating them to parity with Manchester United on points.
Jamie Carragher heaped praise on Rio Ngumoha following Liverpool’s nervy 1-0 victory over Nottingham Forest on Saturday, stating the youngster ‘changed the game’. The victory is significant as it marked Liverpool’s third consecutive win in all competitions, bringing them level on points with Chelsea and Manchester United in the Premier League.
In a tense encounter at the City Ground, Liverpool initially struggled to gain momentum. However, Alexis Mac Allister scored the decisive goal in the seventh minute of stoppage time, after a VAR check confirmed he was onside following a disallowed effort for handball earlier in the match. The relief was palpable for Liverpool’s head coach, Arne Slot, who admitted his side faced difficulties in the first half.
Ngumoha shines in cameo
Rio Ngumoha was instrumental in Liverpool’s late push, coming on for Mohamed Salah in the 77th minute and causing problems for Nottingham Forest’s defence with his pace. Jamie Carragher noted, “There was a player who came on for Liverpool: Rio Ngumoha, who came on in the 77th minute,” highlighting that he “did more in 15 minutes than [Cody] Gakpo and Salah had done up until that point.”
Arne Slot acknowledged the lowly league position of Nottingham Forest, stating he was ‘surprised’ by their struggles despite the quality they exhibited during the match. He emphasised, however, that Liverpool showed a different side in the second half, after making tactical changes.
Mac Allister reflects on mixed emotions
Following the match, Alexis Mac Allister expressed mixed emotions over the victory. “I love scoring, I love winning, so… in that sense, I think it’s a really good day,” he said, yet acknowledged that “we didn’t play very well, so there’s plenty of things that we need to improve.”
Mac Allister also addressed the disallowed goal, feeling it was ‘a bit harsh’ as it hit his elbow but noted that it was a fair decision given the rules. Liverpool’s next fixture will be closely watched as they look to maintain their momentum in the Premier League.
Russia launches heavy bombing campaign on Ukraine, injuring 15 on Monday
3:00 pm
Get you up to speed: Russia Launches Mass Missile Strikes Against Ukraine Ahead of Invasion Anniversary
Russia targeted Ukraine with 50 missiles and nearly 300 drones, injuring fifteen people and killing one man in the Kyiv region. This attack occurred as the four-year anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion approaches, with temperatures dropping to -10C during the strikes.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reported the attacks on social media, identifying energy and logistical infrastructure as primary targets. Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv’s military administration, confirmed the use of ballistic weapons, urging residents to seek shelter.
Significant damage was reported, particularly in Mykolaiv, where 16,000 people lost electricity amid freezing conditions. Zelenskyy noted that Russia had executed over 1,300 drone attacks in the preceding week.
What we know so far
At least one person killed as Russia targets Ukraine with 50 missiles
Russia’s latest assault on Ukraine involved the launch of 50 missiles and almost 300 drones, resulting in injuries to fifteen individuals and one fatality in the Kyiv region. The attack coincided with frigid temperatures of -10C impacting the region, as reported by local authorities.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy revealed on social media that energy and logistical infrastructure were among the targets, while Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv’s military administration, urged residents to stay in shelters due to ongoing attacks with ballistic weapons.
The strikes targeted multiple regions, including Kyiv, Dnipro, and Odesa, causing substantial damage to energy facilities, as confirmed by emergency workers. In Mykolaiv, around 16,000 residents were affected by power outages following the destruction of energy infrastructure.
In Lviv, a police officer died and twenty-five people were injured due to a separate terror attack involving homemade bombs, as stated by the National Police of Ukraine. Ukrainian officials indicated that several suspects have been detained in connection with the incident.
Amid the ongoing conflict, US President Donald Trump’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff hinted at the possibility of a summit between Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin in the near future. This statement followed Zelenskyy’s comments about the potential for further talks by the end of February.
Local insights
Related Election News
© 2026 WTX News.