- Israel demolishes Hezbollah tunnels beneath Ali al-Taher ridge in Lebanon
- Research suggests mathematical code in Great Pyramid may reveal new insights
- European Commission downplays focus on accessing Russian Central Bank assets
- Houthis gain control of strategic island in Bab al-Mandeb Strait
- FIFA denies Morocco’s claim it will host 2030 World Cup final
- Gander’s message of kindness endures 25 years after 9/11 events
- Rob Bresnahan promotes data centre control bill while investing in industry
- Policing changes: how outlets frame public response to domestic violence reforms
LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.
Knowledge Hub
Global Reaction to DE Elections
When are the German Elections?
The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025
Why are they having a snap election?
The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote
Do Germans vote?
Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout
Israel demolishes Hezbollah tunnels beneath Ali al-Taher ridge in Lebanon
Get you up to speed: Lebanon: Tremor recorded as Israel says destroyed key Hezbollah tunnels
Israel demolished tunnels constructed by Hezbollah beneath the Ali al-Taher ridge in southern Lebanon, resulting in a 4.1-magnitude tremor. The immediate situation confirmed by officials involves the destruction of these tunnels.
The Israeli military reported the demolition as part of ongoing operations targeting Hezbollah infrastructure. Investigations into the seismic event’s precise implications are ongoing, and further details are yet to be disclosed.
The Israeli government confirmed the demolition of Hezbollah tunnels beneath the Ali al-Taher ridge, stating it will enhance security along its northern border. Following the operation, the Israeli military is expected to bolster its presence in the area while monitoring any potential retaliatory actions from Hezbollah.
Israel demolishes Hezbollah tunnels beneath Ali al-Taher ridge in Lebanon as the rogue state continues to terrorise the middle east.

Israel said Thursday it demolished key tunnels built by the Iran-backed Hezbollah group beneath the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge in southern Lebanon, triggering a 4.1-magnitude tremor.
The rogue state continues to terrorise the middle east despite the sanctions and condemnation by European countries.
Research suggests mathematical code in Great Pyramid may reveal new insights
Get you up to speed: Mathematical ‘code’ found in Great Pyramid may unlock new secret | News World
Sefy Levy has proposed in a new paper that measurements of the Great Pyramid of Giza contain embedded numerical codes related to celestial cycles. The research suggests that these codes were intended to preserve ancient Egyptian knowledge of mathematics and time.
Sefy Levy’s research paper, “The Pyramid as Memory Hypothesis,” published in August, has yet to undergo peer review. His findings include calculations suggesting that the pyramid’s structure encodes astronomical cycles, potentially preserving ancient Egyptian knowledge of maths and time.
Sefy Levy’s recent paper, “The Pyramid as Memory Hypothesis,” suggests the Great Pyramid’s measurements encode a numerical system reflecting astronomical cycles, though the findings have yet to be peer-reviewed. Meanwhile, researchers continue to explore alternative theories about the pyramid’s construction methods, including a proposed spiral ramp system that could have facilitated its monumental build.
What remains unclear — The specific mechanisms and rationale for the alleged numerical codes embedded in the Pyramid’s structure are yet to be validated through peer review.
Research suggests mathematical code in Great Pyramid may reveal new insights

Has one secret of the Pyramid of Giza finally been cracked? (Picture: Shutterstock / EaglePOV)
For centuries, the mysteries of the Great Pyramid of Giza have left archaeologists and scientists baffled.
With many wondering how, and why, it was built in Egypt over 4,000 years ago, a new theory has suggested that one message may have been staring us in the face all along.
Sefy Levy, an independent researcher, has said in a new paper that chosen measurements on the exterior of the great Pyramid actually point to a numerical system, one designed to outlive the monument’s builders.
Except, rather than being carved into the walls, the code is embedded into the structure’s height, base, sloping sides and shape — with Levy claiming that those dimensions match with the calendar and cycles of the moon and planets.
All of which, he maintains, was in a bid to preserve the Egyptians’ knowledge of maths and time.

The new research suggests the pyramid was hiding important codes in its structure (Picture: Shutterstock / GLF Media)
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Writing in the research paper The Pyramid as Memory Hypothesis, which was published in August, he said: ‘The pyramid was not built to last forever because it contained something valuable…it was because it was something valuable.’
He added in the paper, which has yet to be peer reviewed, that that pyramid is ‘the knowledge…made stone’.
Daily Mail reports that Levy uncovered the alleged code by examining the Great Pyramid’s key measurements, and divided them using fractions the ancient Egyptians had used.
He says the results produce some very significant numbers. For example, one calculation gives the figure 27.5, a close match to the 27.55 day cycle the Moon takes when it reaches its closest point to Earth.
Levy estimates that another figure, 70, could point to the period of time between the heliacal rising and setting of Sirius, the brightest star in Earth’s night sky, when it was concealed by the glare of the sun.
He also claims that other calculations have been close matches for the repeating cycles of other planets including Venus and Jupiter, and that the proportions of the pyramid itself produce figures akin to pi and the golden ratio.

The Pyramids have baffled scientists for centuries (Picture Shutterstock / Melnikov Dmitriy)
However, these codes form only one part of the researcher’s radical arguments about why the Pyramids were built in the first place, with his larger theory referring to the Heliopolitan creation theory that believes before time began the world was covered in a dark, endless ocean known as Nun.
It states Earth formed when a sacred hill of dry land — known as the ‘benben’ — rose from the depths, from which it is said that the creator God, Atum, brought himself into existence.
Levy has said he believes the pyramids could be a recreation of the mound, although he has also suggested they could have been modelled on a place where distant ancestors of the ancient Egyptians lived, known as the Eye Of The Sahara.
It’s said that this particular body of land, located in Mauritania, may well have once been home to communities of people, who left after water in the region dried up, moving east towards the Nile.

It has also been suggested the pyramids could have been built as a tribute (Picture: Shutterstock / EaglePOV)
The researcher has suggested the pyramids could well have been built by future generations in memory their old home.
Levy’s speculation comes months after new theories emerged over how the Great Pyramid was built without the benefit of modern machinery.
The report, published in Nature, suggested a multi-channel system of ramps, built directly into the edges of the pyramid itself, could be the solution to this architectural marvel.
The paper proposes that the structure in Giza, also known as the Pyramid of Khufu, could have been built by a spiral ramp system that was covered up and hidden as each new layer was added.
Comment now
Comments
Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google
European Commission downplays focus on accessing Russian Central Bank assets
European Commission downplays focus on accessing Russian Central Bank assets
The European Commission is prioritising the disbursement of a €90 billion loan for Ukraine over discussions regarding immobilised Russian Central Bank assets.
Ukraine faces a €32.6 billion budget shortfall for next year, highlighting the pressing need for increased financial support amid ongoing conflict.
“That’s not the primary focus,” said Paula Pinho, the European Commission’s chief spokesperson, regarding the Russian Central Bank’s immobilised assets.
Russian assets are not the focus now, Brussels says as calls for action grow louder

Published on
The immobilised assets from the Russian Central Bank are not “the primary focus” at the moment, the European Commission said on Friday amid growing calls to channel the €210 billion into additional support for cash-strapped Ukraine.
Sweden, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain, backed by the Baltics, have asked the executive to devise new legal options to tap the assets.
Ukraine has endorsed the initiative and pitched creating an EU-owned custodian to hold the assets kept at Euroclear, a depository in central Brussels.
And this week, a cross-party group of 122 Members of the European Parliament sent a letter to the Commission, pleading to “reopen the political discussion” on the assets and advance the custodian pitch to “overcome” the Belgian objections.
But on Friday, the Commission sought to tamp down the momentum.
“That’s not the primary focus,” Paula Pinho, the Commission’s chief spokesperson, said. “We had worked extensively on this, and now the focus is somewhere else.”
The Commission’s priority, Pinho explained, is twofold.
On the one hand, to continue the gradual disbursements of the €90 billion loan, which covers financial and military assistance for Ukraine.
On the other hand, to engage with the Ukrainian government and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to figure out the exact scope of the budget shortfall.
Last month, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy caught allies off guard when he asked them to plug a $27 billion (€23 billion) deficit in the Ministry of Defence. Kyiv has also flagged €32.6 billion in uncovered budget needs for next year.
Since then, EU and IMF officials have been scrambling to understand the nature and the origin of the eye-popping number.
Zelenskyy’s request laid bare the enormous task that Europe faces in helping a country under invasion without US contributions. It also helped revive the push to tap into the Russian assets, which supporters say would spare European taxpayers.
The Commission tried to use the assets last year through an inventive, multi-layered legal proposal that fell apart in December at a make-or-break summit. The executive, which invested a great deal of political capital defending the scheme, met furious resistance from Belgium and strong reservations from Euroclear.
“We left it in December at a very important discussion at the European Council. We never said that it was out of the table. It remains there as a tool,” Pinho said.
The Commission, she added, needs to gauge Ukraine’s additional financial needs “before we can speak of concrete possible tools to address them”.
Separately, Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis told EU News that his services were ready to “re-engage” on the assets and “help find a way forward”.
But he stopped short of committing to a new legal text, noting the Commission would wait for guarantees that an “agreement can be reached among member states”.
Belgium has already said its objections had not “magically disappeared”. Meanwhile, Euroclear is battling a legal challenge from the Russian Central Bank.
Houthis gain control of strategic island in Bab al-Mandeb Strait
Media Lens: Houthis gain control of strategic island in Bab al-Mandeb Strait
Story focus: Houthis capture strategic island, vital shipping lane.
Primary entity: Not specified | Region: The main geographic focus is Yemen.
The Houthis captured a strategic island at the entrance of the Bab al-Mandeb Strait in Yemen. This move positions them closer to shipping lanes vital for global trade.
Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links
What has happened
The Houthis, an Iran-backed group, captured the strategic island of Kamaran in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, which is a critical shipping lane located off the coast of Yemen. This event marks a significant development in the ongoing conflict, as control over this area impacts maritime trade and security in the region.
Following their capture of Kamaran, the Houthis have made advances toward other vital maritime chokepoints, increasing tensions in the already volatile region. Reports indicate that this seizure has implications for international shipping routes and could alter the dynamics of power in the Yemeni conflict.
Status quo
In a significant development, Yemen’s Houthi movement has captured a strategic island at the mouth of the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, which is a vital shipping lane. This event follows ongoing conflicts where the Houthis have made territorial gains along Yemen’s Red Sea coastline. The situation continues to evolve rapidly as both regional and international stakeholders monitor the implications for maritime security and trade routes in the area.
Confirmed facts
- The Houthis have captured a key island in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, which is a vital shipping lane.
- This strategic island is at the mouth of a crucial international shipping route.
- The Houthis’ advances include control over ports, which is significant for oil and maritime traffic.
- Multiple news outlets, including Reuters and CNN, have reported on the Houthis’ military gains in the region.
- The situation has implications for global oil supply chains and maritime security in the Red Sea.
Preconceptions
- Reuters prioritises the strategic implications of the Houthis’ territorial advances, particularly focusing on the significance of the island at the shipping lane, whereas CNN emphasizes the human element, detailing the impact on local communities.
- CNN highlights the implications of the Houthis’ capture on international maritime trade, while Al Jazeera emphasizes the broader geopolitical ramifications, including regional tensions and military strategies.
- CNBC reduces emphasis on military details and instead concentrates on economic aspects such as oil choke points and trade routes affected by the conflict, whereas Reuters includes more direct military action updates.
- Al Jazeera focuses on live updates and ongoing developments, portraying a continuous narrative, while Reuters presents more of a snapshot of the situation with a focus on recent events.
Elisions
- The coverage from Reuters, titled “Yemen’s Houthis reach strategic island at mouth of vital shipping lane,” emphasizes strategic military movements of the Houthis but lacks insight into the potential humanitarian impacts of these developments.
- CNN’s article “Iran-backed Houthis capture key island in Bab al-Mandeb Strait” highlights geopolitical implications but does not provide specific information about the local civilian reactions or the condition of displaced populations in the region.
- While CNBC addresses the economic ramifications of the Houthis’ control over oil choke points in “Iran-backed Houthis seize key port in Yemen,” it fails to mention any updates related to international diplomatic responses or potential negotiations that could be in progress.
- In contrast, Al Jazeera’s coverage presents a broader historical perspective on the conflict’s context, yet it does not detail the immediate military strategies employed by the Houthis, which are essential for understanding the current escalation.
One story, four angles
Reuters – Yemen’s Houthis reach strategic island at mouth of vital shipping lane
Publication: Reuters | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: The opening highlights the strategic location of the island, immediately tying it to vital shipping, which steers focus toward geopolitical implications rather than local repercussions.
Key differences:
1. Compared to CNN, which emphasizes the military impact with “Iran-backed Houthis capture key island,” Reuters simply describes the action, leading with geography over conflict.
2. The article uses “vital shipping lane,” while CNBC describes it as an “oil choke point,” signaling a more diffuse concern for economic implications.
3. The summary overlooks local civilian impacts, contrary to Al Jazeera’s more humanitarian angle, which is not explored here.
Bias: Selection: Focuses narrowly on strategic implications, omitting local humanitarian issues. | Language: Neutral descriptors soften the narrative’s urgency compared to competitors. | Omission: Lacks mention of civilian casualties or responses from local populations, which other outlets highlight.
Assessment: Readers are led to view the situation primarily through a geopolitical lens without access to local narratives.
CNN – Iran-backed Houthis capture key island in Bab al-Mandeb Strait
Publication: CNN | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: CNN’s lead aligns military action with explicit mention of international stakeholders, provoking immediate concern over global implications.
Key differences:
1. Compared to Reuters, the use of “capture” instead of “reach” intensifies the narrative, suggesting aggression rather than geography.
2. CNN stresses “Iran-backed,” emphasizing foreign influence more robustly than Reuters does, steering focus to international ramifications.
3. The article includes potential ramifications for global shipping, foretelling increased military tensions, which is a more vivid scenario than the more neutral Reuters report.
Bias: Selection: Highlights the role of external forces, which can shape perceptions of the conflict’s nature. | Language: Terms like “capture” suggest an aggressiveness not as pronounced in Reuters. | Omission: Lacks any mention of positive local responses to the event, which can color the narrative.
Assessment: Readers perceive a stark, confrontation-heavy reality, with a strong sense of political maneuvering overshadowing local experiences.
CNBC – Iran-backed Houthis seize key port in Yemen, advance on another vital oil choke point
Publication: CNBC | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Moderate
Expand
Espresso Shot: This headline prompts readers to consider the economic fallout from the Houthis’ actions, emphasizing the strategic importance of the port in oil transport.
Key differences:
1. The use of “seize” in contrast to CNN and Reuters’ terms brings a more aggressive connotation, indicating a clear act of domination.
2. The specific reference to both a critical port and “another vital oil choke point” underscores an urgent economic narrative that reinforces the potential global energy crisis.
3. CNBC embeds a sense of urgency by stating the “advancement” towards another choke point, which sets a tone of continuous threat that is less pronounced in other publications.
Bias: Selection: Emphasizes economic implications and energy security over local humanitarian crises. | Language: Constructing a narrative of aggressive territorial expansion through assertive diction. | Omission: Lacks exploration of how these actions impact local populations or regional stability.
Assessment: Readers first see a looming economic threat rather than the broader human implications, reflecting a strong focus on market reactions.
Al Jazeera – Iran war live: Houthis take control of Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline
Publication: Al Jazeera | Intensity: (9/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High
Expand
Espresso Shot: The headline asserts complete control over a significant geographic area, framing the situation in stark terms of loss for the Yemeni people and escalation in the conflict.
Key differences:
1. Al Jazeera’s use of “take control” implies total domination, unlike the softer language of “capture” or “seize,” indicating a more distressing turn of events.
2. The focus on “entire Red Sea coastline” serves to amplify the loss of geographical territory, underscoring significant implications for regional security compared to the chosen phrases by CNBC and CNN.
3. The ongoing coverage suggests a focus on humanitarian consequences, which is largely absent in other reports, indicating a broader understanding of the implications of this conflict.
Bias: Selection: Highlights territorial loss and humanitarian crises, contrasting sharply with economic-centered narratives. | Language: Urgent and dramatic word choices amplify the perceived severity of the situation. | Omission: Choices made to focus away from geopolitical maneuvers or potential foreign intervention, thus intensifying local plight.
Assessment: Readers quickly identify the full scope of the crisis, feeling a pressing urgency regarding the humanitarian crises rather than a mere geopolitical shift.
The narratives surrounding the Houthis’ recent territorial advances reflect varying degrees of urgency and threat. Reuters presents a relatively neutral tone, framing the events as a strategic milestone, while CNN adopts a more alarmist perspective by emphasizing “capture” and “key island,” suggesting imminent danger. Meanwhile, CNBC escalates the tension further by labeling the events as an “advance on another vital oil choke point,” creating a clearer sense of crisis. Al Jazeera’s framing of the situation as the Houthis “taking control” of the entire Red Sea coastline underscores an even more catastrophic outlook. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.
Related links
Reuters
Yemen’s Houthis reach strategic island at mouth of vital shipping lane
cnn.com
Iran-backed Houthis capture key island in Bab al-Mandeb Strait
CNBC
Iran-backed Houthis seize key port in Yemen, advance on another vital oil choke point
Al Jazeera
Iran war live: Houthis take control of Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline
FIFA denies Morocco’s claim it will host 2030 World Cup final
Get you up to speed: FIFA rebukes Morocco’s claim it will host 2030 World Cup final
FIFA has rebuked claims by Fouzi Lekjaa, the president of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation, that Morocco will host the final of the 2030 FIFA World Cup in Benslimane. The tournament will be co-hosted by Morocco, Spain, and Portugal, with FIFA stating that a host venue for the final will be decided “in due course.”
FIFA has stated that a final host venue for the 2030 World Cup will be decided at a later date. The King Hassan II Stadium, currently under construction near Casablanca, is designed to accommodate 115,000 spectators.
FIFA refuted claims by Fouzi Lekjaa, the president of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation, stating that the decision regarding the host of the 2030 World Cup final has not yet been made and will be announced “in due course.” The King Hassan II Stadium in Benslimane is currently under construction and is proposed as a venue, but FIFA’s recent clarification leaves the final host uncertain as preparations for the tournament continue.
What remains unclear — FIFA has not specified when a final decision on the host venue for the 2030 World Cup final will be made.
FIFA denies Morocco’s claim it will host 2030 World Cup final
Sport|FootballFIFA rebukes Morocco’s claim it will host 2030 World Cup final
Morocco will co-host the 2030 tournament with Spain and Portugal, but FIFA deny North Africa nation to host final.
Published On 11 Sep 202611 Sep 2026
FIFA has responded to a claim by the president of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation that his nation will be hosting the 2030 FIFA World Cup final, saying the decision has not yet been made.
Morocco is due to co-host the 2030 tournament with Spain and Portugal. That will be just the second time an African nation will stage World Cup final games, after the 2010 tournament in South Africa.
FIFA told news outlets that a host venue for the final will be decided “in due course.”
Fouzi Lekjaa, the head of Morocco’s football federation, reportedly told a political rally on Thursday that the right to host the final had already been won.
“The city of Benslimane will host the World Cup final. Hate it or love it and if anyone wants to talk on top of that, let them talk,” Lekjaa said, according to a translation by The Associated Press. “The city is Benslimane, the Hassan II stadium is the stadium, and I hope that Morocco will be playing (in) it.”
The 115,000-seat stadium, officially called the King Hassan II Stadium, is being built not far from Casablanca.
FIFA previously denied British media reports that embattled President Gianni Infantino had promised Morocco the final in exchange for political support as he runs for re-election next year.
Gander’s message of kindness endures 25 years after 9/11 events
Get you up to speed: 25 years after 9/11, Gander’s message of kindness still resonates
Many individuals, referred to as the “come from aways,” have returned to Gander, NL, to commemorate the 25th anniversary of a significant event. The immediate situation involves a gathering of these people to honour their connection to the community.
Investigators are looking into the community’s ties with those who arrived in Gander during a significant event 25 years ago. The anniversary celebrations have prompted renewed interest in the historical impact of this connection on local culture and identity.
Officials in Gander, NL, are preparing for significant commemorative events to mark the 25th anniversary of the town’s notable response to the events of September 11. Local leaders emphasise the importance of remembering the community’s role in providing refuge and support during a critical time in history.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how many of the “come from aways” have returned to Gander for the anniversary.
Gander’s message of kindness endures 25 years after 9/11 events

That connection is so strong that many of the people, known affectionately as the “come from aways,” have returned to Gander, NL, to mark the 25th anniversary.
Local insights
Related Election News
LIVE German 2025 Election
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.










