LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Hungary advances rule of law under new prime minister, EU report says

Hungary advances rule of law under new prime minister, EU report says

Key Development
Hungary has decided to join the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, enabling investigations into financial crimes affecting the EU budget.
Strategic Importance
Hungary’s decision to join the European Public Prosecutor’s Office signifies a crucial step towards enhancing financial accountability within the EU, impacting budgetary integrity.
Positive Trends

“We see some very positive trends […] in the early weeks of the new government’s mandate, a lot has already been done,” stated EU Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath.

Rule of Law in Hungary shows ‘radical change’ under Magyar, EU says

Hungary advances rule of law under new prime minister, EU report says

Published on Updated

Hungary has taken significant steps to restore the rule of law in the two months since Prime Minister Péter Magyar took office, the European Commission said in a report presented on Friday.

The new government has launched “intense reform efforts”, with several legislative changes already advanced, according to the report, which describes the progress made as “impressive” given the short time since the change of government.

“You have a very radical change compared with last year’s report. Things have moved very, very quickly in the right direction,” a senior EU official told EU News.

A key development was Hungary’s recent decision to join the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, which investigates and prosecutes financial crimes affecting the EU budget across member states.

The report also highlights progress in several areas, including anti-corruption measures, asset declarations and the work of the Integrity Authority.

Magyar has also dismantled the “Sovereignty Protection Office”, a body established under his predecessor, Viktor Orbán, which could access citizens’ personal data to investigate and sanction alleged foreign agents. The office had been targeted by an EU infringement procedure.

“We see some very positive trends […] in the early weeks of the new government’s mandate, a lot has already been done,” EU Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath said during a press conference presenting the report.

‘Things can’t change overnight’

Despite the reform push, the Commission said significant shortcomings remain in Hungary’s justice system.

“Things cannot completely change overnight,” a senior EU official told EU News, stressing that many recommendations made in previous years’ reports have yet to be addressed.

One example is the procedure for appointing the Prosecutor General, which remains a concern for the Commission because it could allow undue political interference in individual cases.

The Commission does not rank EU countries’ performance, but publishes dedicated chapters assessing each member state. For Hungary, the remaining concerns include the functioning of the judiciary, corruption risks and unresolved violations of EU law.

Civic space also continues to be classified as “obstructed” in the report. The complexity of registration procedures in Hungary remains a challenge for smaller organisations with limited resources.

The Rule of Law Report could become increasingly important in the coming years, as the European Commission seeks to strengthen the link between compliance with rule-of-law standards and the allocation of EU funds under the 2028-34 EU budget.

Countries that fail to meet these standards could see payments suspended, although Commissioner McGrath stressed that there would be no automatic mechanism triggered solely by the report’s findings.

US Strikes Iranian Infrastructure as Tensions Escalate in Region

Media Lens: US Strikes Iranian Infrastructure as Tensions Escalate in Region

Story focus: U.S. targets Iranian bridges and energy infrastructure.

Primary entity: Not specified   |   Region:

The main geographic focus is Iran.

The United States has targeted Iranian bridges and energy infrastructure as part of its military strategy. This action aims to disrupt the regime’s supply routes amidst escalating tensions between the two nations.

Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links


What has happened

On July 17, 2026, the United States reportedly targeted bridges and energy infrastructures in Iran as part of a military strategy to disrupt supply routes for the Iranian regime. This action was framed within a broader context of escalating tensions and retaliation between the U.S. and Iran, complicating the regional security landscape significantly.

The strikes aimed at crucial infrastructure signify a potential shift in military tactics employed by the U.S. against Iran, intensifying the ongoing conflict. Reports from various news sources, including The Washington Post and CNN, highlight the implications this may have for civilian life and stability within Iran amid increasing military escalations.

Status quo

Recent developments in the U.S.-Iran conflict have escalated, marked by U.S. military operations targeting Iranian infrastructure, specifically bridges and energy facilities. These actions are part of a broader strategy aimed at constraining Iran’s operational capabilities. In parallel, Iran has responded with increased military strikes, indicating a significant intensification of hostilities in the region.

Confirmed facts

  • The U.S. has increased its military strikes targeting Iranian infrastructure.
  • U.S. forces hit bridges and energy targets in Iran as part of the ongoing conflict.
  • The conflict between the U.S. and Iran shows no sign of de-escalation.
  • There is a significant focus on disrupting supply routes utilized by the Iranian regime.

Preconceptions

  • The **Washington Post** prioritizes diplomatic implications of U.S. strikes on Iranian infrastructure, emphasizing the broader geopolitical context, while reducing focus on immediate military outcomes.
  • CNN emphasizes ongoing live updates and real-time developments in hostilities, prioritizing current events in conflict dynamics, whereas it reduces historical background context in reporting.
  • Al Jazeera presents a critical perspective on U.S. military actions, prioritizing analysis of humanitarian impacts on civilians, while downplaying the potential strategic military advantages.
  • The Wall Street Journal highlights the economic ramifications of the strikes, prioritizing financial and logistical disruptions caused by the attacks, while offering less emphasis on political or international responses.

Elisions

  • **Iran’s Civilian Infrastructure Attacks**: Al Jazeera focuses on the political ramifications and motivations behind the U.S. attacks on Iran’s civilian infrastructure, whereas CNN emphasizes real-time updates on military actions, including specific strikes.
  • **Supply Chains Targeted**: The WSJ reported on targeted strikes to cut off Iranian supply routes but did not delve deeply into how these changes affect local economies or the humanitarian aspect; in contrast, CNN provides more extended coverage on the immediate humanitarian impacts.
  • **Military Strategy Analysis**: The Washington Post presents a strategic analysis of U.S. military objectives, lacking in-depth coverage of the Iranian perspective or potential responses, which Al Jazeera highlights by exploring local narratives and reactions from Iranian officials.

One story, four angles


The Washington PostU.S. hits bridges and energy targets, Iran says, as strikes widen

Publication: The Washington Post | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: Readers are prompted to consider the U.S.’ military strategy against Iran first, framing the narrative around military actions rather than diplomatic responses.

Key differences:
1. **Focus on Strikes**: The headline emphasizes U.S. military actions (“hits bridges”) as primary, downplaying the Iranian perspective.
2. **Language on Reaction**: Use of “as strikes widen” suggests escalation but also implies inevitability, steering attention from diplomatic solutions.
3. **Omission of Civilian Impact**: The lack of mention regarding civilian casualties or broader implications of strikes may lead to a less critical analysis of U.S. actions.

Bias: Selection: Emphasis on U.S. military action over Iranian civilian concerns | Language: Neutral yet decisive wording (“hits”) implies justification | Omission: No mention of possible humanitarian crises or international law violations.

Assessment: Readers likely believe the U.S. is justified in its military actions, overshadowing potential ethical questions.


CNNLive updates: Iran steps up retaliation as war with US shows no sign of de-escalating

Publication: CNN | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: The title immediately signals ongoing conflict, leading readers to focus on the escalating tensions between Iran and the U.S.

Key differences:
1. **Immediate Updates**: “Live updates” invokes urgency, compelling readers to focus on the dynamic situation’s real-time developments.
2. **Assessment of Conflict**: The phrase “shows no sign of de-escalating” presents an alarming viewpoint, heightening perceived danger and urgency.
3. **Retaliatory Emphasis**: Centering on Iranian retaliation emphasizes ongoing violence, perhaps obscuring diplomatic alternatives or negotiations.

Bias: Selection: Focus on conflict escalation over potential peaceful resolutions | Language: Alarmist tone (“no sign of de-escalating”) accentuates urgency and instability | Omission: Lack of context regarding pre-existing tensions or diplomatic efforts.

Assessment: Readers likely perceive the situation as perilous, reinforcing narratives of violence over peace efforts.


WSJU.S. Targets Iranian Bridges in Bid to Choke Off Regime’s Supply Routes

Publication: WSJ | Intensity: (9/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: The reader’s focus is directed immediately towards the tactical goals of U.S. actions, painting a picture of a strategic military initiative against Iran.

Key differences:
1. **Strategic Language**: The phrase “target Iranian bridges” underscores a deliberate military strategy focused on infrastructure, shaping readers’ political understanding.
2. **Regime Focus**: Referring to “regime” implies a critical view of Iran’s governance, influencing public opinion against Iranian leadership.
3. **Choking Off Supply Routes**: This suggests severity and tactical acumen, leading readers to view the U.S. actions as calculated and potentially necessary.

Bias: Selection: Highlighting the tactical nature of military actions over broader implications | Language: Tactical language (“choke off supply routes”) may imply justification | Omission: Lack of discourse on the humanitarian impact or broader geopolitical consequences.

Assessment: Readers may believe the U.S. strategy is morally and strategically sound, overlooking potential humanitarian costs.


Al JazeeraWhy is the US attacking southern Iran’s civilian infrastructure?

Publication: Al Jazeera | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Critical | Legal precision: Moderate

Expand

Espresso Shot: The title centers on the ethical implications of U.S. actions, driving readers to contemplate civilian impact rather than military strategy.

Key differences:
1. **Questioning Tone**: Using a question (“Why is the US attacking…”) invites critical thinking and may provoke skepticism toward U.S. actions.
2. **Focus on Civilian Impact**: Phrasing emphasizes “civilian infrastructure,” directing attention to the humanitarian consequences, contrasting with other publications.
3. **Contextual Perspective**: The mention of “southern Iran” gives geographical specificity, enhancing readers’ understanding of the regional dynamics involved.

Bias: Selection: Highlights human rights implications over military justifications | Language: Inquisitive tone encourages skepticism and critical engagement | Omission: Limited context on U.S. justification for actions.

Assessment: Readers might perceive U.S. actions as ethically questionable, fostering criticism of American military strategy.


The Washington Post’s coverage is the most escalatory, emphasizing U.S. military actions as aggressive interventions against Iran, framing them as deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure. In contrast, CNN’s reporting adopts a more neutral tone, focusing on the broader geopolitical implications without sensational language. Meanwhile, WSJ offers a pragmatic view that hints at the strategic motives behind U.S. actions. Al Jazeera’s framing critiques these operations and questions their justification, enhancing the critical perspective. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.


The Washington Post

U.S. hits bridges and energy targets, Iran says, as strikes widen

CNN

Live updates: Iran steps up retaliation as war with US shows no sign of de-escalating

WSJ

U.S. Targets Iranian Bridges in Bid to Choke Off Regime’s Supply Routes

Al Jazeera

Why is the US attacking southern Iran’s civilian infrastructure?

Saskatchewan child care licence applicants report denial of applications

Get you up to speed: Applicants for child care operator licences in Saskatchewan say they’re being denied

The opposition party reported difficulties for parents in finding nearby daycare facilities, citing that childcare licence applications are being denied. This issue is affecting families across the region.

The opposition party has highlighted difficulties parents face in locating accessible daycare facilities due to a high number of denied childcare licence applications. There is currently no information available regarding the specific reasons for the application denials or any planned changes to the licensing process.

The opposition party has called for immediate action, stating that parents are struggling to find nearby daycare options due to denied childcare licence applications. In response, the government is reviewing the application process and plans to implement measures to streamline approvals.

What remains unclear — It is unknown why childcare licence applications are being denied.

Saskatchewan child care licence applicants report denial of applications

childcare operators denied
The opposition party says parents are having a hard time finding a daycare close to their home, and what doesn’t help… childcare license applications are being denied.

Trump addresses election security claims and releases declassified documents

Get you up to speed: In primetime speech, Trump revisits disputed claims about election security and declassifies documents

President Trump delivered a primetime address on Thursday evening, alleging serious flaws in the U.S. election system and claiming that China had acquired 220 million U.S. voter registration files. The White House simultaneously released newly declassified documents on election security, which did not support Trump’s claims of voter fraud or manipulation during the 2020 election.

The White House has declassified documents ( but they circumstantial) related to an investigation into allegations of fraudulent voter registrations in Michigan, which was ultimately closed without further action. The Justice Department has faced multiple legal setbacks in its attempts to access state voting records for compliance with federal laws.

In response to President Trump’s address, a White House official confirmed that newly declassified information does not support claims of switched votes or hacked voting machines. Following the speech, David Becker of the Center for Election Innovation and Research argued that the information presented was merely a reiteration of previously debunked theories, indicating little change in public discourse around election integrity.

What remains unclear — These actions are not based on actual evidence and China does not accept them is uncertain how China intended to use the publicly available voter registration data it allegedly acquired.

Trump addresses election security claims and releases declassified documents

In a primetime address Thursday evening, President Trump alleged the U.S. election system falls “catastrophically short,” revisiting a topic that has drawn his attention for years — and making claims that election experts have heavily disputed.

The White House released a trove of newly declassified documents on election security in conjunction with the address. In a briefing with reporters several hours before the speech, a White House official acknowledged that none of the newly released information would allege that any votes were switched or voting machines hacked. The president and his allies have long insisted otherwise, falsely claiming the 2020 election was stolen from him due to widespread fraud.

Mr. Trump used part of his speech to push lawmakers to pass the SAVE America Act, a suite of controversial proposed election law changes, including requirements to show proof of citizenship to register to vote. That legislation remains stuck in limbo, with some Senate Republicans skeptical. Mr. Trump’s allies in the GOP caucus largely praised the speech and echoed his calls to pass the SAVE America Act, while Democrats blasted it and accused Mr. Trump of seeking to undermine elections.

Shortly after the speech wrapped up, David Becker, executive director for the Center for Election Innovation and Research, argued that little groundbreaking information was revealed.

“This administration has been in total control of the federal government for 18 months. They’ve redirected untold taxpayer resources to try to uncover evidence of massive voter fraud,” he said. “And at the end of that 18 months, all we got is more rehashed, debunked conspiracy theories, many of which we’ve known about before and already knew didn’t affect our elections.”

Trump is setting up his voter base to expect poor performance in the upcoming midterms.

Trump and China

One of the more notable allegations leveled by Mr. Trump was that the Chinese government had acquired 220 million U.S. voter registration files from 2020 to 2023 in what the president called “the largest compromise of election data in history.” The information, the president said, included voters’ names, addresses, phone numbers and party affiliations.

The president alleged that intelligence agencies “kept the information secret and hidden,” never disclosing China’s access to U.S. voter registration data to him or to Congress.

However, voter registration data is publicly available. Some states post the information online, and many others allow people to freely request it, though some personal information on voters is kept confidential. It’s also not clear how China intended to use the data, and having access to voter rolls does not necessarily allow people to commit fraud.

“It sounds bad when you hear about it,” said Becker, who is a WTX US News election law contributor. “The reality is: voter files in the United States are public.”

A 2020 intelligence report declassified almost four years ago found China had obtained multiple states’ voter data “to conduct public opinion analysis on the 2020 US general election.”

There remains no evidence that China — or any other country — tried to manipulate the results of the 2020 election by interfering with voting processes. The U.S. intelligence community assessed in March 2021 that no foreign actor “attempted to alter any technical aspect of the voting process,” including the casting of ballots, the vote-counting process or voter registrations.

Mr. Trump also alleged that China “fought like hell” to prevent him from winning in 2020: “The Chinese government wanted [the] U.S. president to lose the next election, and the reason they wanted me to lose is because they knew I was wise to them.”

There is some debate about China’s role in the 2020 race, which the documents released Thursday reflect. The National Intelligence Council publicly assessed shortly after the election that China stayed on the sidelines, deciding neither a Trump nor Biden presidency would be “advantageous enough for China to risk getting caught meddling.” But that assessment notes a “minority view” from one intelligence official that China did try to denigrate Mr. Trump, including through social media posts and official statements.

The National Intelligence Council’s assessment did find that Russia tried to influence the 2020 election by promoting the Trump campaign, while Iran tried to undercut the Trump campaign. Still, neither country tried to interfere with voting systems.

China, for its part, has strongly denied any interest in interfering in U.S. elections. The Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., told WTX US News on Thursday it has “all along adhered to the principle of non-interference in other’s internal affairs.”

Dead and non-citizen voters

Mr. Trump also pointed to findings by the federal government that “hundreds of thousands of non-citizens and dead people are listed and active on the voter rolls.”

In particular, he pointed to a Department of Homeland Security review of state voter rolls and public records that determined that more than 250,000 non-citizens are registered to vote in federal elections across four states — California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Nevada.

Becker questioned those findings, arguing “we should take that with a great big grain of salt.”

“That’s based on using commercial data that cannot be used,” Becker said during a WTX US News special report. “It’s going to create a ton of false positives. I guarantee you, that data includes a ton of people, maybe even a majority of people, who are absolutely eligible voters, and states would probably be breaking the law if they remove those voters from the rolls.”

It’s illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, and documented cases are extremely rare. The Brennan Center for Justice looked at 42 jurisdictions where a combined 23.5 million people voted in 2016, and found just 30 instances of suspected non-citizen voting.

State-level results are similar. A 2024 audit in Georgia found 20 of the state’s 8.2 million registered voters were not citizens, and the same year, Ohio found 597 non-citizen registered voters in 2024 out of its more than 8 million voters, including 138 who cast ballots. Last year, Texas found 2,724 “potential non-citizens” among its over 18 million voters, and Louisiana found 390 non-citizens out of just under 3 million voters, 79 of whom voted in at least one election.

Proven cases of voting by dead people are also rare. Georgia officials found just four cases of votes cast in the names of dead people in the 2020 election, and Arizona officials found one. Michigan lawmakers found two cases in the county that houses Detroit, but one of them was a clerical error and the other involved a person who died after mailing in her ballot.

The Justice Department has sued dozens of states for access to their voting records, saying it wants to screen the records for compliance with federal laws that require states to maintain clean voter rolls and check for non-citizen voters. To date, the federal government has lost in district courts 11 times and has not scored any legal victories in its fight for voter rolls.

The White House also declassified files about an FBI investigation into a 2020 Michigan voter registration drive that state and federal law enforcement agents believed included fraudulent registrations. The probe was closed, drawing pushback from investigators.

Mr. Trump called the target of the probe a “Democrat get-out-the-vote organization,” and argued the “Biden Department of Justice slow-walked the investigation and killed it.”

Those allegations of suspicious voter registrations in Muskegon County, Michigan, have been publicly known for years. State officials have said the questionable registrations were caught before any fraudulent votes could be cast.

Voting machines

The president alleged voting machines and ballot-counting systems are “extremely exposed to attack,” calling them “vulnerable” and “easily compromised.” He later pointed to CIA intelligence about plots to use voting machines for fraud in Venezuela.

However, the Venezuela-related intelligence released by the White House focuses on election systems made by the company Smartmatic — and that company’s technology is not used in the United States, aside from in Los Angeles County.

In general, experts say voting machines are extremely difficult to compromise: They are closely monitored, they aren’t connected to the internet, and in almost every state, they are backed up by paper ballots or receipts that can be audited to check the results by hand.

“They’re under lock and key until they are publicly tested to make sure they haven’t been tampered with,” Becker said. “And then they are used and we still don’t trust them. We have those paper ballots.”

For example, every 2020 general election ballot in Georgia was tallied three times: once by machines during the original counting process, once in an audit that involved a hand recount in every county statewide, and once in a machine recount requested by the Trump campaign. All three counts affirmed that former President Joe Biden defeated Mr. Trump.

Elsewhere in Thursday’s speech, Mr. Trump pointed to newly declassified intelligence that U.S. adversaries like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea have the ability to compromise U.S. election infrastructure.

The document that Mr. Trump appeared to reference — a National Intelligence Council memo from January 2020 — does state that U.S. adversaries have the “capability” to compromise election infrastructure. It points to voter registration databases as one possible vulnerability.

But it later explains that systems used to tabulate votes or display results would be “difficult to manipulate on a wide enough scale to compromise election results.” The memo said exploiting the systems often requires “physical proximity” and would likely be caught by audits.

The memo also warns that foreign adversaries could make “wholly fabricated” or “exaggerated” claims about their ability to manipulate voting systems, in an effort to “undermine public confidence.”

Tribute paid to Olive Farrow, aged four, killed by car in Gotham

Get you up to speed: Family’s tribute to ‘cheeky’ girl, 4, killed by car weeks before starting school | News UK

A four-year-old girl, Olive Farrow, was fatally struck by a car on Nottingham Road in Gotham just before 3.30pm on Sunday, July 12. She was treated at the scene and subsequently died in hospital.

The family has organised a vigil at St Lawrence’s Church in Gotham for Friday, requesting that media members respect their privacy. Nottinghamshire Police have confirmed that the investigation into the circumstances surrounding Olive Farrow’s death is ongoing, and they have urged members of the public to refrain from speculation on social media.

The family of Olive Farrow, the four-year-old girl who died after being hit by a car, has organised a vigil at St Lawrence’s Church in Gotham on Friday, requesting media respect for their privacy. Nottinghamshire Police are investigating the circumstances of her death and urge the public not to speculate on social media.

What remains unclear — The specific circumstances leading to the incident that resulted in Olive Farrow’s death are still under investigation.

Tribute paid to Olive Farrow, aged four, killed by car in Gotham

Olive Farrow smiling in a photo.
Olive Farrow was run over on Nottingham Road in Gotham just before 3.30pm last Sunday (Picture: Nottinghamshire Police)

The family of a four-year-old girl who died after being hit by a car have paid tribute to their ‘cheeky, funny and sassy little girl’, saying she was looking forward to starting school.

Olive Farrow was run over on Nottingham Road in Gotham just before 3.30pm last Sunday, July 12.

She was treated at the scene and then taken to hospital but died there a short time later.

Her family thanked locals for their support and the ‘outpouring of love’ they had shown for Olive.

In a statement, they said: ‘Olive was a cheeky, funny and sassy little girl, who may have been tiny in size, but she certainly made up for it with her big personality.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

Tributes have been paid to a 'cheeky, funny and sassy little girl' who was tragically killed following a road traffic collision. Emergency services were called to Nottingham Road in Gotham at 2.28pm on Sunday 12 July following a collision between a vehicle and a girl. Tragically, Olive Farrow, aged four, died a short time later in hospital. Family have thanked the local community for their overwhelming support during this incredibly difficult time. In a family statement they said: "Olive was a cheeky, funny and sassy little girl, who may have been tiny in size, but she certainly made up for it with her big personality. "Not a day went by without Olive singing and dancing her way round the house and spreading her affection; always kissing and cuddling and going out of her way to be kind to everyone. "Olive's memory will live on with all the colourful paintings we have around the house. Quite often she would take herself off and come back with a beautiful work of art as she was so creative. "Olive had two brothers, Teddy and Sonny, who she was inseparable from and looked up to with so much love. "Olive was due to join Sonny at primary school, having had her taster sessions. She was so excited to be joining her brother there. "No words can express the loss and pain felt across the family and all that knew Olive, we are utterly devastated to think we can no longer hold her in our arms. "We would like to thank the community for coming together to support us through this difficult time. It has helped greatly to see the outpouring of love with the messages and flowers laid on Nottingham Road." Owner email_pictures_at_ukmetr
Olive’s was ‘a cheeky, funny and sassy little girl, who may have been tiny in size, but she certainly made up for it with her big personality’ (Picture: Nottinghamshire Police)

‘Not a day went by without Olive singing and dancing her way round the house and spreading her affection; always kissing and cuddling and going out of her way to be kind to everyone.

‘Olive’s memory will live on with all the colourful paintings we have around the house. Quite often she would take herself off and come back with a beautiful work of art as she was so creative.’

They added that she was ‘inseparable’ from her two brothers Teddy and Sonny, whom she ‘looked up to with so much love’.

Her relatives continued: ‘Olive was due to join Sonny at primary school, having had her taster sessions. She was so excited to be joining her brother there.

‘No words can express the loss and pain felt across the family and all that knew Olive, we are utterly devastated to think we can no longer hold her in our arms.

‘We would like to thank the community for coming together to support us through this difficult time. It has helped greatly to see the outpouring of love with the messages and flowers laid on Nottingham Road.’

Floral tributes pictured off Nottingham Road in Gotham, Nottinghamshire, following the death of a four-year-old girl.
Floral tributes pictured off Nottingham Road in Gotham, Nottinghamshire (Picture: BPM Media)

The family has organised a vigil at St Lawrence’s Church in Gotham on Friday for friends, family and members of the local community, and have asked members of the media not to attend.

Sergeant Paul Clark, from Nottinghamshire Police, said: ‘This is a deeply tragic incident, and our thoughts continue to be with Olive’s loved ones at this unimaginably difficult time.

‘The circumstances of her death are being investigated, and we would ask people not to speculate on social media.

‘I would also ask the privacy of the family is respected as they come to terms with what has happened, including at today’s vigil.’

Anyone with information is asked to contact the police quoting incident 424 of July 12.

Trump, Ryanair and tourism highlight plight of Western Sahara’s Sahrawi people

Get you up to speed: Trump, Ryanair, The Odyssey… and the world’s forgotten people | News World

Budget airlines, including Ryanair and Transavia, have begun operating flights to Dakhla, a city in Western Sahara claimed by Morocco. The situation remains complex, as many international bodies do not recognise Morocco’s sovereignty over the territory, despite the Moroccan government promoting it as part of their country.

The Moroccan government has invested significantly in tourism infrastructure in Western Sahara, attracting budget airlines to Dakhla, despite its contested status under international law. Humanitarian conditions in the five Sahrawi refugee camps remain dire, with appeals from UN agencies for increased aid amid reports of rising malnutrition.

The UN has failed to mention the long-promised referendum for Western Sahara during recent discussions, extending the peacekeeping mission instead. Meanwhile, concerns have been raised by local activists regarding the complicity of travel companies in perpetuating the Moroccan occupation through mislabeling the region as part of Morocco.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how the UN plans to address the long-promised referendum for Western Sahara amidst shifting international perspectives.

Trump, Ryanair and tourism highlight plight of Western Sahara’s Sahrawi people

Kite-surfers manuever their kites at Dakhla beach in Morocco-administered Western Sahara on October 10, 2019. In the heart of disputed Western Sahara, a former garrison town has become an unlikely tourist magnet after kitesurfers discovered the windswept desert coast on the Atlantic is perfect for their sport. (Photo by FADEL SENNA / AFP) (Photo by FADEL SENNA/AFP via Getty Images)
Kitesurfers at Dakhla, in the heart of what international law recognises as the occupied Western Sahara (Picture: Fadel Senna/AFP via Getty Images)

Brahim Chagaf doesn’t know what it’s like to go home.

‘When you’re young, you have this dream of returning, to set up a little business and have a house by the ocean,’ he tells WTX. ‘But after a while, that wears off. You start to lose hope.’

The film director, 38, is one of the ‘forgotten people’ of Western Sahara, a tract of desert the size of Britain widely described as Africa’s last colony.

For 50 years, the indigenous Sahrawi people have been forced to live under occupation or go into exile when Morocco invaded and annexed the region after Spain withdrew in 1976.

Today, 173,000 Sahrawi refugees live in five camps in the harshest part of the desert, across the border in southwestern Algeria.

This decades-long displacement is one of the world’s most enduring yet overlooked refugee crises.

But now budget airlines, Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey and Donald Trump are pushing it into the spotlight.

Flights for ‘pennies’

Sprawling along a windswept peninsula where the Sahara meets the Atlantic, the city of Dakhla is certainly attractive.

It has sparkling white sands, dazzling blue waters and enticing accommodation options, from hostels to luxury resorts.

A map of the Western Sahara and Morocco, focusing on Dakhla
Western Sahara is widely described as Africa’s last colony by the UN and international rights groups (Picture: WTX)

The Moroccan Tourist Board describes it as ‘the pearl of southern Morocco…a ‘small part of paradise’.

But Dakhla is not part of Morocco under international law, no matter what the government in Rabat claims.

To get to Dakhla, British travellers must first make their way to Madrid, but from there, return flights on Ryanair start from just €40 (£35). Transavia France also operates a route from Paris.

The Moroccan government has invested heavily in developing tourism in Western Sahara in recent years, and this has attracted the airlines.

Flights with Ryanair, Transavia and other travel sites market Dakhla as Morocco, and when you search for a place to stay in Western Sahara on three of the biggest international booking sites, Expedia, Booking.com and Trivago, they do the same.

SEI 261257135 7ac1
Dakhla is written beside a Moroccan flag on Ryanair campaign material (Picture: Ryanair)

Tom Ruck, 29, recently flew to Dakhla from Madrid with Ryanair as a ‘cheaper way of getting to Mauritania’ to ride the Iron Ore train.

It was ‘pennies’ for the fare, the British content creator tells WTX, and on arrival there ‘wasn’t any inkling that it was Western Sahara’.

Tom got a Moroccan stamp in his passport and saw Moroccan flags flying across the city.

‘It was just as though it [Western Sahara] didn’t exist, really,’ he says.

Ryanair and Transavia did not respond to requests for comment, nor did Expedia and Trivago.

A zoomed out selfie of travel content creator Tom Ruck in front of the border into Western Sahara which is marked with a Moroccan flag
British traveller Tom Ruck with the Moroccan flag hanging in Dakhla (Picture: Tom Ruck)

A Booking.com spokesperson said: ‘Our mission is to make it easier for everyone to experience the world and as such we believe it’s up to travellers to choose where they want and need to go. It’s not our place to decide where someone can or cannot travel.’

Danielle Smith, director of London-based charity Sandblast, which supports Sahrawi refugees in the UK, says this labelling is both concerning and misleading.

‘From our perspective, these companies are complicit in prolonging the suffering of the Sahrawi people by helping entrench the occupation,’ she adds.

Sarah Yerkes, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and an expert in North Africa, notes that Morocco has been ‘increasingly effective in its efforts to get other countries’ to refer to Western Sahara as Morocco.

She says this normalisation lays the groundwork for a formal change in international law.

The Moroccan government did not return a request for comment.

Looking to history

Western Sahara was a Spanish colony, from 1884 to 1975. But when Francoist forces formally withdrew in 1976, Morocco occupied large parts in violation of international law and a decision from the International Court of Justice.

Occupying forces met resistance from the Sahrawis, who organised under the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) and its military wing, the Polisario Front. War broke out, ending 15 years later with a UN-brokered ceasefire in 1991.

Since then, reports from groups including Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and the Robert and Ethel Kennedy Human Rights Center have documented systematic human rights abuses, police brutality and restrictions on movement and freedom of speech targeting Sahrawis.

WTX has approached Hakim Hajoui, Morocco’s Ambassador to the UK, about these claims but has not received a response.

A Western Saharan woman and child passes by sunbathers on a beach in Dakhla on February 28, 2010. Dakhla, with its bay on the Atlantic Ocean, is a popular destination for watersports enthusiasts. AFP PHOTO/ABDELHAK SENNA (Photo by ABDELHAK SENNA / AFP) (Photo by ABDELHAK SENNA/AFP via Getty Images)
A Sahrawi woman and child pass sunbathers on a beach in Dakhla on 28 February, 2010 (Picture: Abdelhak Senna/AFP via Getty Images)

The UN has consistently pushed for a solution, including a referendum in which the Sahrawis could choose between independence and integration with Morocco.

The Sahrawi right to self-determination is supported by more than 100 UN resolutions, by the opinion of the International Court of Justice, and, to date, by four rulings of the EU Court of Justice.

But they have never been able to vote for their own future.

Brahim Chagaf feels it firsthand. ‘The hope wears off when you see how the international community is ignoring the laws that they themselves wrote,’ he says.

A pickup truck passes by a hilltop manned by Moroccan soldiers on a road between Morocco and Mauritania in Guerguerat located in the Western Sahara, on November 23, 2020, after the intervention of the royal Moroccan armed forces in the area. - Morocco in early November accused the Polisario Front of blocking the key highway for trade with the rest of Africa, and launched a military operation to reopen it. (Photo by Fadel SENNA / AFP) (Photo by FADEL SENNA/AFP via Getty Images)
A pickup truck passes by a hilltop manned by Moroccan soldiers on a road between Morocco and Mauritania in Guerguerat in Western Sahara on November 23, 2020 (Picture: Fadel SENNA / AFP via Getty Images)

In 1975, fleeing war, more than 100,000 indigenous Sahrawis crossed into Algeria.

Today, their descendants live in crowded camps in the Tindouf region, administered by the Polisario Front and entirely reliant on humanitarian aid.

Residents of the camps face profound challenges, including access to food and water, and an extreme desert climate where summer temperatures can exceed 50°C and winters are desperately cold.

All five of the camps are named after cities in the occupied territories (Dakhla, Smara, and the capital, Laayoune), but most of the people who live there have never been to these places.

Many have never set foot where their parents or grandparents were born.

PRI178634453 2d98
Children play football in downtown Dakhla (Picture: Getty Images)

Instead, they have survived for half a century on a food aid programme that was never supposed to last for more than a few years.

They choose to live this way because if they settled elsewhere, they would no longer be regarded as refugees. It would mean they have accepted the situation, that they have given up.

Mahfud Bechri, member of the working group on Human Rights in Occupied Western Sahara, says that sweeping cuts to international aid made by the Trump administration have caused conditions to worsen.

‘We have seen how anaemia and malnutrition have increased,’ he explains.

‘UN agencies and the humanitarian NGOs have issued urgent appeals calling for the need to mobilise resources and to respond to this forgotten and protracted humanitarian crisis. Yet, the response is not coming.’

The Saharawi Refugee Camps were set up in 1975-1976 to house Saharawi refugees from Morocco's occupation of Western Sahara. Algerian authorities have estimated the number of Sahrawi refugees in Algeria to be 165,000 in the five camps in south western Algeria where people live on food packages from aid organisations and remittances from the Saharawi Diaspora, Boujdour Camp, Tindouf, Algeria, 5 April 2018. (Photo by Noe Falk Nielsen/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Boujdour Camp, one of five Sahrawi refugee camps near Tindouf, Algeria (Picture: Noe Falk Nielsen/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Abidin Mohamed Hamudi, Sahrawi filmmaker and journalist, remains defiant.

‘Colonialism, occupation, and the oppression of peoples are crimes that have spanned centuries,’ he says.

‘Yet if history has taught us anything, it is that the people ultimately triumph, justice prevails, and humanity endures.’

The ‘movie of the year’

Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey may be one of the most anticipated films of the year, but it has no fans at the Western Sahara international film festival (FiSahara).

Organisers have called for a boycott of Nolan’s $250m adaptation over scenes shot in the territory, warning the move serves to whitewash the Moroccan occupation.

The British-American filmmaker’s take on Homer’s epic, with an A-List cast led by Matt Damon, is due to be released on 17 July.

Jimmy Gonzales ia Cepheus, Matt Damon as Odysseus and Himesh Patel as Eurylochus in a scene from The Odyssey.
Jimmy Gonzales as Cepheus, Matt Damon as Odysseus and Himesh Patel as Eurylochus in The Odyssey (Picture: Universal Pictures via AP)

The shoot in the Dakhla area lasted four days and while it was reportedly completed before FiSahara raised concerns, activists are urging people to stay away from screenings all the same.

‘We condemn Nolan for using his privilege to engage in extractive filmmaking in an occupied territory without the consent of its rightful owners, and for helping Morocco to perpetuate its illegal occupation,’ says Maria Carrion, director of the festival.

Nolan’s representatives did not return requests for comment.

Trump’s shifting allegiance

Weeks before leaving office in 2020, Donald Trump upended decades of US policy in North Africa by proclaiming US support for Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara, as part of a deal that saw the North African Kingdom recognising Israel.

Perhaps the President, long supportive of a wall on America’s southern border, was impressed with Morocco’s own wall cordoning a corner of the Sahara.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (L), Moroccan King Mohammed VI (2nd L) and his son Crown Prince Hassan Moulay (2nd L), US First Lady Melania Trump (2nd R) and US President Donald Trump (R) attend a ceremony at the Arc de Triomphe in Paris on November 11, 2018 as part of commemorations marking the 100th anniversary of the 11 November 1918 armistice, ending World War I. (Photo by BENOIT TESSIER / POOL / AFP) (Photo by BENOIT TESSIER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Trump with Moroccan King Mohammed VI (centre), his son Crown Prince Hassan Moulay (2nd left), Melania Trump (2nd right) and then-Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on 11 November, 2018 at the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day (Picture: Benoit Tessier/AFP via Getty Images)

The Berm, as it is known, is a giant sand barricade patrolled by more than 100,000 Moroccan soldiers, designed to keep Sahrawis in the eastern part of the desert – and away from the region’s natural resources.

Joe Biden’s administration chose not to implement his predecessor’s policy. But the U-turn paved the way for other countries to follow suit, making it more difficult for the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) to establish an independent state.

At one point, as many as 84 countries recognised the SADR administration in the territory of Western Sahara, according to a 2024 report from Migration Policy.

But today, dozens, including the UK, have endorsed Morocco’s claim of sovereignty.

Now the United Nations appears to want to integrate Western Sahara into Morocco, too.

When it last discussed the territory in October 2025, there was no longer any mention of the long-promised referendum.

Instead, the presence of the UN peacekeeping mission was extended for another 12 months as part of a motion led by the US.

Brahim was ‘extremely anguished’ when he heard the news.

A Saharawi man holds up a Polisario Front flag in the Al-Mahbes area near Moroccan soldiers guarding the wall separating the Polisario controlled Western Sahara from Morocco on February 3, 2017. - It is the world's oldest functioning security barrier, dubbed a wall of "shame" and "death" by Western Sahara residents and leaders who want independence from Morocco. (Photo by STRINGER / AFP) / TO GO WITH AFP STORY BY AMAL BELALLOUFI (Photo credit should read STRINGER/AFP via Getty Images)
A Saharawi man holds up a Polisario Front flag in the Al-Mahbes area near Moroccan soldiers guarding the Berm on 3 February, 2017 (Picture: AFP via Getty Images)

‘Sahrawis understand better than anyone what this means,’ he says.

‘The long-term strategy is basically to do away with the referendum that was promised, to create a situation of inevitability and fatigue’ regarding acceptance of the occupation.

Morocco claims Western Sahara on the grounds that a few Sahrawi tribes once pledged allegiance to the sultan of Morocco.

They say that calls for Western Saharan independence ignore centuries of historic ties between Morocco and the Sahara, and that the territory was illegally detached during the colonial era.

To that, Brahim has a question: ‘Let’s suppose there are real, historic ties, and that Sahrawis were Moroccans. Then why is Morocco so afraid of a referendum? What does it have to fear?’

He also points to a 1975 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which acknowledged certain historical ties, but concluded that these did not amount to sovereignty.

Crucially, it affirmed the Sahrawi right to self-determination.

Presidents, airlines and movie crews may come and go, but the people of Western Sahara are still waiting to have their say.

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

LIVE German 2025 Election