LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Belgium reports 306 salmonella cases linked to Laerco egg contamination

Belgium reports 306 salmonella cases linked to Laerco egg contamination

Salmonella outbreak
At least 306 people in Belgium have been infected with salmonella linked to eggs produced by Laerco in Geel.
Health Impact
Over 300 salmonella infections in Belgium highlight significant public health risks associated with contaminated food products, necessitating swift regulatory action and rigorous food safety measures across Europe.
Health warning
“Consumers are advised to check for eggs from Laerco and discard any suspected products to ensure safety,” stated the Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain.

At least 306 people infected with salmonella in Belgium in outbreak linked to eggs

Belgium reports 306 salmonella cases linked to Laerco egg contamination

At least 306 people have been infected with salmonella in Belgium after they ate eggs, according to figures released by the Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC).

The outbreak has been linked to eggs produced by Laerco, a company based in Geel in northern Belgium. Salmonella was first detected at the facility at the end of April. The following month, a large-scale recall saw all eggs from the site withdrawn from the market.

Contamination spreads

At first, the contamination appeared to be confined to one of the company’s four henhouses, but the number of new cases did not fall as expected.

New laboratory tests subsequently detected the bacteria in a second henhouse, before FASFC decided to halt operations at the farm and launch another recall of potentially contaminated eggs.

The products concerned were distributed throughout several major supermarket chains, including Colruyt, Delhaize, Aldi and Carrefour.

The precautionary recall has also been extended to Luxembourg, while FASFC has notified several other European countries that may have received the eggs, including the Netherlands, France, Italy and Portugal.

What is salmonella?

Salmonella are a group of bacteria that can cause a gastrointestinal illness called salmonellosis. Symptoms of infection often include diarrhoea, a fever, and abdominal cramps, while more serious cases can lead to a high fever and aches. It can also be fatal in some cases.

The bacteria, which live in the guts of many farm animals, can be passed to food products such as eggs during rearing, slaughtering, or processing.

Darline Graham wins South Carolina runoff for Republican Senate nominee

Media Lens: Darline Graham wins South Carolina runoff for Republican Senate nominee


Darline Graham wins South Carolina GOP Senate runoff.

Sen. Darline Graham is projected to win the runoff in the South Carolina GOP Senate primary, defeating Rep. Ralph Norman. This information is based on coverage in latest US news and US and global politics.


What happened

Senator Darline Graham is projected to win the runoff election against Rep. Ralph Norman in the South Carolina GOP Senate primary. The results indicate a significant victory for Graham, solidifying her position as the Republican nominee.

This election is seen as an important benchmark for both local and national political landscapes, highlighting key voter sentiments within South Carolina. Analysts note that this outcome may have implications for future GOP strategies in the state.

Key facts

  • Darline Graham is projected to win a runoff in the South Carolina GOP Senate primary.
  • Graham is competing against Ralph Norman in the runoff election.
  • The election results indicate a win for Graham, marking a significant political event in South Carolina.
  • This runoff is part of the broader context of elections happening in South Carolina and other states.

Where coverage differs

  • CBS News emphasizes Darline Graham’s victory and implications for the GOP, while CNN emphasizes broader takeaways from the elections, including Trump’s win.
  • The New York Times foregrounds insights from multiple elections including Graham’s and Trump’s, while The Guardian focuses solely on Graham’s win as significant for the Senate race.
  • CNN prioritizes a more comprehensive analysis of election trends among various candidates, whereas CBS News highlights a single notable victory in the South Carolina runoff.

One story, four angles


CBS NewsSen. Darline Graham projected to win runoff in South Carolina GOP Senate primary, defeating Rep. Ralph Norman

Publication: CBS News | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Objective | Intensity: 6/10 | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: CBS News projects Darline Graham as the winner in the South Carolina GOP Senate primary, showcasing a political contest’s outcome without delving into broader implications for the GOP or future elections. The article adheres to a straightforward report on electoral results.

Publication emphasis: The article focuses on the electoral success of Darline Graham.

Framing analysis: The primary emphasis is on the election outcome, while the context surrounding the implications of the election is secondary.

Bias: Selection: Focused content on election results. Language: Neutral diction. Omission: Potential implications of the outcome for broader political landscapes.

Assessment: CBS News effectively presents factual information about the election outcome with minimal framing.


CNNTrump gets a much-needed South Carolina win and other takeaways from Tuesday’s elections

Publication: CNN | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Analytical | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: CNN emphasizes the significance of Trump’s victory in South Carolina and explores several outcomes from the elections, providing analysis on its potential impact on the political landscape. The focus goes beyond the immediate results.

Publication emphasis: The article highlights Trump’s electoral success and its implications for future elections.

Framing analysis: The focus is on the implications of the elections that favor Trump, with analysis discussing broader trends and consequences, putting less emphasis on specific election mechanics.

Bias: Selection: Broader analysis beyond just results. Language: Encouraging tone towards Trump’s victory. Omission: Less discussion on the opposition’s performance.

Assessment: CNN successfully places the electoral results within a broader narrative, analyzing significance rather than merely reporting results.


The New York TimesGraham, and Trump, Triumph: Six Takeaways From Runoffs in South Carolina and Oklahoma

Publication: The New York Times | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Reflective | Intensity: 8/10 | Sentiment: Positive | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: The New York Times analyzes the political ramifications of both Graham’s and Trump’s electoral wins, presenting them as key indicators of changing dynamics within the GOP. The article synthesizes election results with insights on future political strategies.

Publication emphasis: Focuses on the broader implications of the election results for the GOP and political strategies.

Framing analysis: It foregrounds the significance of the electoral outcomes in shaping the political landscape while contextualizing it against GOP’s broader trends.

Bias: Selection: Highlights implications for GOP strategies. Language: Positive framing regarding the election outcomes. Omission: Analyzes winners while providing less detail on voter sentiments or opposition.

Assessment: The New York Times effectively combines results with thorough analysis, offering insights into future political trends following the elections.


The GuardianSouth Carolina chooses Darline Graham as Republican nominee for US Senate

Publication: The Guardian | Primary framing pattern: Political | Tone: Informative | Intensity: 7/10 | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: The Guardian reports on the selection of Darline Graham as the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate, providing context on his candidacy and conservative positions without extensive analysis of the electoral implications beyond the nomination.

Publication emphasis: Reports primarily on Graham’s nomination outcome.

Framing analysis: Focuses on the result while providing context about Graham’s conservative stance, with less emphasis on potential political impacts.

Bias: Selection: Primarily focused on the nominating process. Language: Straightforward and factual. Omission: Little discussion on the reactions or implications of the nomination.

Assessment: The Guardian delivers a clear, factual report on the nomination, though it lacks depth in exploring broader political consequences.


Food for thought

CBS News employs the strongest legal framing by emphasizing election integrity and the implications of voter turnout in the South Carolina Senate runoff. It presents a factual recounting of the election process while highlighting the significance of the votes cast. In contrast, CNN adopts the most escalatory framing, illustrating the stakes of the elections through hyperbolic language that stresses a “much-needed win” for Trump, suggesting dire consequences for his political future if defeats persist. The New York Times notes Graham’s triumph but leans towards a narrative analyzing the broader implications of election dynamics in the GOP. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.

Anwar Ibrahim highlights Malaysia’s non-aligned stance in Taiwan remarks

Get you up to speed: Malaysia’s Anwar puts non-aligned stance in focus with remarks on Taiwan

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim stated in an interview that he considers Taiwan “as part of China, period,” drawing mixed reactions from the Chinese government and Taiwan. Following these remarks, Anwar emphasized Malaysia’s respect for China’s position while advocating for a peaceful resolution to tensions in the Taiwan Strait.

Anwar Ibrahim’s comments have emerged amid Malaysia’s growing economic ties with China, now its largest trade partner, alongside substantial Taiwanese investments in the semiconductor sector. The Prime Minister’s statements come ahead of his planned trip to China in September, suggesting a potential aim to navigate Malaysia’s positioning in global geopolitics.

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s comments on Taiwan have sparked significant concern, with Taiwan’s government warning that his pro-China stance could deter Taiwanese investment in the country, particularly in the semiconductor sector. In response, Anwar has attempted to clarify his position, emphasising Malaysia’s commitment to a peaceful resolution of tensions in the Taiwan Strait while also calling for strengthened defence measures in Sabah amid heightened military activity in the region.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain how Anwar’s comments on Taiwan will influence Malaysia’s traditional policy of non-alignment in the long term.

Anwar Ibrahim highlights Malaysia’s non-aligned stance in Taiwan remarks

ANALYSISNews|PoliticsMalaysia’s Anwar puts non-aligned stance in focus with remarks on Taiwan

Malaysian leader’s comments on the island have prompted discussion about whether the country is leaning towards China.

Published On 26 Aug 202626 Aug 2026

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s recent comments about Taiwan have raised questions about whether Malaysia is still committed to its traditional policy of non-alignment and not picking sides between China and the United States.

In an interview with WTX News that aired earlier this month, Anwar stated that he saw Taiwan “as part of China, period”, adding that this was “accepted by all”.

More controversially, when asked whether he would condemn China if it resorted to force in the event that peaceful “reunification” did not work, Anwar said that if a Malaysian state were attempting to break away, he would use force to “protect the sanctity and unity of” Malaysia.

Anwar’s comments were praised by the Chinese government, with a Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman stressing that Taiwan is “an inalienable part of China’s territory” and that “China must and will be reunited”.

Taiwan’s government condemned the remarks and warned that Anwar’s “one-sided support for China could negatively impact Taiwanese businesses’ confidence in investing in Malaysia”.

Taiwan, the world’s largest chips producer, is a major investor in Malaysia, particularly in the country’s crucial semiconductor industry.

Anwar Ibrahim highlights Malaysia’s non-aligned stance in Taiwan remarksThe iconic Taipei 101 skyscraper, the tallest building in Taiwan, can be seen between an alleyway in Taipei on December 26, 2022 [Chiang Ying-ying/AP]

Asked about the issue by local media, Anwar appeared to walk back some of his comments, stressing that Malaysia respected China’s position but favoured a peaceful resolution to tensions in the Taiwan Strait.

Anwar courted headlines again several days after his WTX News interview when he called for the bolstering of Malaysia’s defences in the Bornean state of Sabah.

He pointed to the development of US-backed military facilities in neighbouring Philippines as justification, in part, for increased defence spending.

The Philippine government is in the process of upgrading military facilities on the island of Balabac, 50km (31 miles) from the Malaysian islands of Banggi and Balambangan.

Balabac was recently added to the Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) between Washington and Manila, which granted US forces access to designated locations in the Philippines.

Anwar’s comments have bolstered longstanding suspicions among Western commentators that Malaysia is turning against the West and aligning with China, breaking from Malaysia’s traditional policy of non-alignment.

Indeed, Anwar’s remarks come amid China’s growing economic presence in Malaysia, with Beijing now representing Malaysia’s largest trade partner.

Malaysia has also been one of the most enthusiastic recipients of Chinese investment projects, including under China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

Anwar’s seemingly pro-China stance also comes as Malaysia diverges from the West on other geopolitical issues, such as the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.

Long a firm critic of Israel, Malaysia under Anwar has been especially vocal in its opposition to Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

Flags bearing the hammer and sickle are flown in front of Tiananmen Gate in Beijing, China, on June 4, 2026Flags bearing the hammer and sickle are flown in front of Tiananmen Gate in Beijing, China, on June 4, 2026 [File: Ng Han Guan/AP]

However, some analysts push back against suggestions of Malaysia undergoing a strategic realignment.

Chee Meng Tan, an assistant professor of business economics at the University of Nottingham Malaysia, noted that Malaysia’s recognition of Taiwan as “part of China” dates to the 1974 communiqué that then-Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak signed with Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai to establish diplomatic relations between their countries.

“What was new was Anwar’s statement on the potential use of force, which the one China policy policy does not explicitly require,” Tan said.

Tan notes that Anwar’s comments should also be seen in the context of his upcoming trip to China in September, as he may be attempting to appease Beijing.

Daniel Loebell, a PhD student at Northwestern University in the US who has studied Chinese investments in Malaysia, suggested that Anwar’s position merely represents a realist understanding of territorial integrity.

“Though this idea of violence against Taiwan is immensely troubling to me, I do not think it differs from Malaysia’s policy at all, as he believes that the PRC attacking Taiwan would amount to attacking a rebel organisation within a single state’s own borders,” Loebell said, using the acronym for the People’s Republic of China.

“As head of the government, Anwar sees recognising one government of China amounting to the PRC government’s exclusive right to a monopoly on the use of force within its borders.”

Anwar’s later comments expressing unease over the US-backed base on Balabac can be viewed as linked to Malaysia’s ongoing dispute with the Philippines over the status of Sabah.

The Philippines has claimed Sabah since the territory joined Malaysia in 1963, a claim Malaysia has consistently rejected.

Manila would reaffirm its claim to Sabah in February this year, maintaining that the Philippines’ Maritime Zones Act 2024 preserved its “existing and valid claims” over part of the state.

In July, the Malaysian government lodged a formal protest with the United Nations over the Philippines’ claim to an extended continental shelf, which Malaysia argued encroached on Sabahan waters.

Tan, the assistant professor, argued that Anwar’s comment on the Balabac military buildup may be “a ‘protect-my-border’ reflex rather than a pro-China gesture”.

Anwar’s call to invest in Sabah’s defences also comes as Malaysia seeks to strengthen its defence posture in Borneo, largely to bolster its claims in the disputed South China Sea, where Malaysia is a claimant state alongside China.

While Malaysia has taken a decidedly less vocal stance on the South China Sea dispute than the Philippines, it has nonetheless maintained strong defence ties with Western powers, partly to quietly balance against China’s aggressive military buildup in the disputed waters.

Singapore’s Chief of Defence Force Vice Admiral Aaron Beng, Australia’s Chief of Defence Force Admiral David Johnston, Malaysia’s Chief of Defence Force General Mohd Nizam Jaffar, New Zealand’s Chief of Defence Force Air Marshall Tony Davies, and UK Chief of the Defence Staff Admiral Tony Radakin pose at the Five Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA) Defence Chiefs’ Conference in Singapore, on May 29, 2025Singapore’s Chief of Defence Force Vice Admiral Aaron Beng, Australia’s Chief of Defence Force Admiral David Johnston, Malaysia’s Chief of Defence Force General Mohd Nizam Jaffar, New Zealand’s Chief of Defence Force Air Marshall Tony Davies, and UK Chief of the Defence Staff Admiral Tony Radakin pose at the Five Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA) Defence Chiefs’ Conference in Singapore, on May 29, 2025 [File: Edgar Su/Reuters]

This is demonstrated in Malaysia’s continued commitment to the Five Powers Defence Arrangements (FPDA), a multilateral security framework that also includes Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

While not a binding defence treaty, the FPDA commits its members to consult with one another in the event of an armed attack on Malaysia or Singapore. Under the framework, two major exercises are held annually – Bersama Shield and Bersama Lima – involving personnel and assets from member countries.

The FPDA maintains an air defence operations arm with headquarters at a Malaysian Air Force base in Butterworth, Penang, headed by a senior Australian Air Force officer.

Australia also maintains a rifle company at Butterworth and a regular maritime security presence in the region via the deployment of maritime patrol aircraft to Malaysia.

As a central pillar of the FPDA, Malaysia facilitates a Western military presence in the region, which analysts argue provides Malaysia with a quiet deterrent for would-be aggressors.

While Malaysia recognises the benefits of continued defence ties with the West, it also gains from continued Western investment.

As Loebell, the PhD student, noted, Malaysia has “maintained diverse economic relations with many states, and this has kept it from deeply aligning with any major power”.

“The USA still maintains as favourable an economic position as China does,” said Loebell, who doubts that Malaysia is seeking to align more closely with China.

“What’s more, Taiwan’s enterprises continue to invest heavily in Malaysia’s semiconductor industry, and Anwar undoubtedly knows and welcomes this.”

Danielle Smith urges Ottawa to restart talks with U.S. ahead of counter-tariffs

Get you up to speed: Danielle Smith wants Ottawa to resume negotiations with U.S. before counter-tariffs

Alberta’s premier has not yet expressed support for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s plan for counter-tariffs. The premier remains one of the few provincial and territorial leaders to withhold endorsement across Canada.

Alberta’s government has not yet clarified its position regarding the proposed counter-tariffs, despite discussions among provincial and territorial leaders. The timeline for any potential decision remains uncertain as the government evaluates the implications of the plan.

Alberta’s premier remains opposed to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s initiative regarding counter-tariffs, setting the province apart from other provincial and territorial leaders who have expressed their support. The premier’s stance may lead to increased tensions within the federal framework as discussions progress, with the possibility of further consultations scheduled to address these differences.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain why Alberta’s premier has not yet expressed support for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s counter-tariffs plan.

Danielle Smith urges Ottawa to restart talks with U.S. ahead of counter-tariffs

1787706015 463 acc9b16c65ef5a13cc4348e3fe7f9a6c6519d7eae34e2cb63b1f91ef0b6e0a37 51edb9
Alberta’s premier has been a holdout among provincial and territorial leaders when it comes to putting their support behind Prime Minister Mark Carney’s plan for counter-tariffs.

Darline Graham and Ralph Norman compete to replace Lindsey Graham in Senate runoff

Get you up to speed: Results roll in as Darline Graham, Ralph Norman face off to replace Sen. Lindsey Graham on South Carolina Senate ballot

South Carolina Republicans are holding a runoff election to select a candidate to replace the late Sen. Lindsey Graham on the November ballot, with Darline Graham and Rep. Ralph Norman competing. Polls closed at 7 p.m. local time, and the immediate outcome is pending.

Polls in South Carolina closed at 7 p.m. local time, with the winner of the runoff set to face Dr. Annie Andrews in the November midterm election. Darline Graham, recently appointed to fill her late brother’s Senate seat, is emphasising domestic issues during her campaign, while questions about her lack of foreign policy experience have emerged.

South Carolina Republicans will determine the candidate to replace Lindsey Graham after a runoff election between Darline Graham and Ralph Norman, with polls closing at 7 p.m. local time. President Trump has actively supported Darline Graham, and the victor will face Dr. Annie Andrews, the Democratic primary winner, in the upcoming midterm election.

What remains unclear — It is unknown which specific policies or legislative proposals Darline Graham intends to pursue regarding national security issues.

Darline Graham and Ralph Norman compete to replace Lindsey Graham in Senate runoff

South Carolina Republicans will decide Tuesday who will replace Sen. Lindsey Graham on the ballot in November’s midterm election, after a rushed campaign in the wake of his sudden death in July.

Graham’s sister, Sen. Darline Graham, faced Rep. Ralph Norman in Tuesday’s runoff election, with polls closing at 7 p.m. local time. The two candidates were the top two vote-getters in the special primary election on Aug. 11. Darline Graham was appointed to serve out the remainder of her late brother’s term, which ends early next year. Lindsey Graham had been running for his fifth term when he died and had just won the Republican primary in June.

Darline Graham, who has no prior experience in elected office, has focused on domestic issues during the abbreviated campaign, which has drawn support from President Trump. Going into Tuesday’s runoff, her lack of preparedness in foreign policy has raised some questions about her candidacy for the full term.

In a debate last week, she stumbled on a question about Taiwan and the South China Sea. Graham said she’s “not that informed on national security,” unlike her late brother, an outspoken foreign policy hawk.

“I’m not a polished politician,” Graham said. “National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military.”

Asked at a news conference whether she’d taken a closer look at the issue of Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific since the debate, she told reporters she had traveled around the state to talk with as many voters as she could. 

“You know how many of them brought up Taiwan or national security? Not one,” she said, adding that they were talking about “the rising cost of health care and affordability, so that’s what’s important to me.”

But when WTX US News’ Ed O’Keefe later asked Graham whether she planned to bring up a specific proposal or legislation on those issues, she offered no plan, responding that we’ll deal with that “when I get there.” Graham, however is already in the Senate and has been serving for about six weeks.

The winner of Tuesday’s runoff will take on Dr. Annie Andrews, who won the Democratic primary in June. Although the South Carolina Senate race is usually a fundraising boon to Democrats, the state remains solidly Republican and has just one Democratic representative in Congress. 

Mr. Trump, who had been close to Lindsey Graham, has thrown his support behind Darline Graham. He campaigned for her in South Carolina last week and held a tele-rally for her on Monday. And the Trump super PAC MAGA Inc surged $827,000 into her campaign for text messages and phone calls on her behalf, according to Federal Election Commission records. Until Darline Graham’s Senate bid, MAGA Inc had spent only about $18,000 in 2026 on a midterm race. The super PAC spent about $1.7 million last year and by the end of the second quarter, it had raised $401 million.

Darline Graham has also garnered the support of South Carolina’s other senator, GOP Sen. Tim Scott, who said after her first few weeks in the Senate and her first-place finish in the primary that he’s “confident she’s the real deal.”

The newly minted senator has billed herself as “a problem solver, a critical thinker, and a leader,” with decades of experience working for South Carolina. Darline Graham, 62, most recently served as commissioner of the South Carolina Commission for the Blind. Graham had a close relationship with her brother, who never married or had children. 

She’s cited their upbringing, where she and her brother observed their parents working long hours at their bar and liquor store in central South Carolina, for their shared work ethic. 

And as she’s pledged to carry out her brother’s legacy, she’s also emphasized that she would chart her own path in the Senate, which could be more conservative than her brother’s. During last week’s debate, she quickly made her views on transgender athletes in sports, abortion and gun rights known.

Meanwhile, Norman, who has represented South Carolina in the House since 2017, has presented himself as an experienced legislator with a track record as a conservative fighter, while calling Graham an “unknown candidate.” 

The real estate developer and longtime member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus was one of a handful of Republicans to jump into the special primary race despite the president’s endorsement of Darline Graham. And for Norman, who was one of only two House Republicans to back former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in her bid to challenge Mr. Trump for the GOP nomination in 2024, it wasn’t the first time he’s been willing to break with the president. 

Norman, 73, has the backing of Haley, who also served as ambassador to the U.N. during the first Trump administration, and called out Darline Graham’s lack of experience after her debate performance.

“Lindsey Graham was well informed on the United States’ national security. Darline Graham admits she’s not,” Haley said on X. “This is not something you inherit. And it’s critical in the U.S. Senate.”

Thousands participate in tug-of-war to move Hirosaki Castle for repairs

Get you up to speed: Hundreds pull giant castle for repairs in epic tug-of-war | News World

Approximately 1,800 volunteers moved the 360-tonne Hirosaki Castle in Aomori Prefecture, Japan, as part of a refurbishment project. The castle was relocated using a traditional technique known as hikiya, with the project set to continue for another week.

The moving process for Hirosaki Castle is expected to take another week, employing approximately 4,100 volunteers in total to shift the structure by 16 feet. Following the relocation, refurbishment efforts will persist, with the castle projected to remain closed to visitors until 2033.

Kensuke Hayasaka, head of the parks and green spaces division with Hirosaki City, stated that the initiative received approximately 8,000 applications for the 1,800 available slots, indicating significant public interest. The castle’s refurbishment is anticipated to extend beyond the current relocation efforts, with reopening not expected until 2033.

What remains unclear — It is not specified when the entire refurbishment of Hirosaki Castle will be completed after the castle has been moved.

Thousands participate in tug-of-war to move Hirosaki Castle for repairs

If you have ever wondered what a game of human vs castle would look like, look no further.

Almost 2,000 strong-armed volunteers proved in northern Japan that with enough people, anything will move, even a 360-tonne castle.

They had enlisted to drag the giant structure by hand, with the historic Hirosaki Castle known for its cherry blossom garden propped on rollers and tied to ropes.

The astonishing show of strength, determination and organisation was on display in the Aomori prefecture on Saturday, where the castle needed moving to its original spot as part of a refurbishment.

People pull ropes attached to a platform carrying the keep of Hirosaki Castle in Hirosaki in Aomori Prefecture, northeastern Japan,
The towering castle was moved with sheer human strength, with a little bit of help from a traditional technique known as hikiya (Picture: Kyodo/Newscom / Newscom / Avalon)

The castle, made up of a fortified tower inside it, had to be moved little more than six feet as part of the works, which have been ongoing since an earthquake wreaked havoc in 2015.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

In total, 1,800 people were needed for the job, but around 8,000 people had put their name forward and applied for the game of tug-of-war.

Organised in groups of 80 people, the participants, equipped with gloves, latched onto the 98 ft ropes to pull the building for the first three feet and seven inches.

Then on Sunday, the participants moved it another 42 inches while chants of ‘so-re, so-re’ (go on in English) rang through the air to set the pace.

Hirosaki Castle
Hiroki Castle has been undergoing renovations since the 2015 earthquake damage (Picture: X/@hirosaki_promo)

Kensuke Hayasaka, the head of the parks and green spaces division with Hirosaki City, told the Guardian: ‘We had about 8,000 applications for the 1,800 slots over the last two days, roughly four times oversubscribed, so not everyone could participate.’

The options for the castle were either dismantling or moving it using the traditional technique called hikiya.

It has been used in Japan for at least 400 years to move entire buildings and is most common in road-widening projects.

The technique is back in the spotlight after being used to preserve heritage sites.

And after a public call-out by the city council in 2015, the Hirosaki Castle project became the first time in a century a citizen-powered hikiya has been used to move a building.

Some fans had travelled from far and wide to take part in the 2026 hikiya.

Motoharu Nakata, 61, had taken part in the first tug-of-war and had travelled to the site again.

He told the Sankei Shimbun outlet: ‘I pulled it 11 years ago too. It’s very moving to be able to participate again. There’s absolutely no other opportunity to pull a castle, it was fantastic.’

The mammoth project will continue for another week with the help of around 4,100 people in total, who will pull the castle for 16 feet.

However, the refurbishment will continue even after the castle is firmly on its original spot.

It is not expected to reopen to visitors until 2033.

The iconic castle was built by the Tsugaru samurai family in 1611, but it burned down in 1627 after a gunpowder accident.

The current structure was erected in 1810.

Hirosaki city at the foot of Mount Iwaki is one of Japan’s top spots for seeing the cherry blossoms or sakura, which pop up between March and April.

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

LIVE German 2025 Election