LIVE German 2025 Election Results as they come in and analysi on who will be the next German Chancellor.

When are the German Elections?

The Elections are on Sunday the 23rd of Feb 2025

Why are they having a snap election?

The German coalition government failed a no confidence vote

Do Germans vote?

Germans vote in big numbers, usually as high 70+ percent voter turnout

Attorneys for David Hearn request investigation into DOJ and Interior conduct

Get you up to speed: Attorneys for Olympian David Hearn ask internal watchdogs at DOJ, Interior Dept. to investigate potential misconduct

Attorneys for Olympic canoeist David Hearn have requested investigations from the Justice and Interior departments regarding his arrest and indictment, which were based on false allegations of vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The case was dismissed by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro after it was determined the damage was caused by a contractor’s error, not criminal activity.

The Justice Department and Interior Department’s Inspector Generals are being urged to conduct thorough investigations into the circumstances of David Hearn’s arrest and subsequent indictment, following allegations of misconduct by officials. A D.C. Superior Court judge ruled on October 1 that the case against Hearn must be dismissed with prejudice, preventing any future prosecution stemming from the incident.

Attorneys for David Hearn are requesting an investigation from the Justice and Interior departments regarding the circumstances of his arrest and indictment, as outlined in a letter to the agencies’ inspectors general. Following a recent court ruling that dismissed the case with prejudice and barred future prosecution, prosecutors at the White House have held meetings to explore potential new charges, although a judge has ruled that the case cannot be reinitiated.

What remains unclear — It is not clear what specific actions the DOJ and DOI inspectors general will take in response to the request for investigation into Hearn’s treatment.

Attorneys for David Hearn request investigation into DOJ and Interior conduct

Attorneys for Olympic canoeist David Hearn asked the internal watchdogs at the Justice and Interior departments on Tuesday to investigate the circumstances surrounding his arrest, indictment and the dismissal of the case, according to a letter seen by WTX US News.

Hearn’s case garnered national attention, after he was falsely accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and subsequently indicted on a charge of felony destruction of government property.

Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, later moved to dismiss the case after she said new information had come to light showing the damage had been caused by a contractor’s “botched installation,” not vandalism. 

“Because of the actions of various DOJ and DOI employees, Mr. Hearn was deprived of his liberty, indicted for a crime he did not commit, threatened with incarceration of up to 10 years, and endured the defaming of his name and reputation by high-ranking government officials,” Hearn’s attorneys wrote in the letter to DOJ Inspector General Don Berthiaume and DOI Inspector General Caryl Brzymialkiewicz.

Those officials, they pointed out, included Pirro, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and President Trump.

“The DOJ OIG and the DOI OIG must conduct detailed and comprehensive investigations to determine what happened inside their agencies that led to the shocking and indefensible treatment of Mr. Hearn,” they wrote. “Anything less than a full and fair review would be a betrayal of your mission and perpetuate the outrageous mistreatment of Mr. Hearn.”

Hearn was initially detained in jail for five hours on June 19, after he stopped by the Reflecting Pool during a bike ride. He put his hand into the water and touched a piece of the liner that had already come loose before he was asked by a member of the National Park Police to remove his hand from the water.

His lawyers said that during his five-hour detention, he was never read his Miranda rights or permitted to make a phone call, and that he only learned he was initially facing misdemeanor charges when he found two citations stuffed into a brown paper bag with his other belongings shortly after his release from custody.

A grand jury in the D.C. Superior Court later indicted him on the felony count on July 2.

Despite a request from Hearn’s attorneys to preserve the physical evidence in the case, his lawyers said the government fenced off the area around the Reflecting Pool in question and undertook repairs to the section of the liner that was at the heart of the indictment.

“The record reflects an indictment obtained through unusual haste and a prosecution shaped from the outset by political pressure and built on an inadequate investigation,” Hearn’s lawyers wrote in the letter to the inspectors general.

Pirro was later spotted toting a large box into the White House that sources later confirmed to WTX US News contained evidence from the case that she presented to Mr. Trump, after he lashed out at her for dismissing the case against Hearn.

The White House has since held meetings with prosecutors to explore whether other charges could be brought. But a Superior Court Judge foreclosed that possibility on Oct. 1, after he ruled that the case had to be dismissed with prejudice — meaning it cannot be brought again.

“Should the Court dismiss this case in a fashion that allows the government to reinitiate prosecution in the future, the Court would be exposing him to the risk that, due to pressure from the President Of the United States apparently motivated at least in part by Mr. Hearn’s political views, he would again be charged with a crime that prosecutors have determined he did not commit,” the judge wrote in the opinion dismissing the case.

The letter alleges that prosecutors had exculpatory evidence in hand before they sought an indictment against Hearn. It also alleges that Pirro improperly approached one of the defense’s expert witnesses who was inspecting the Reflecting Pool and peppered the expert with questions.

“Defense counsel was given no notice that the encounter would take place and was not present for it, and the government has never produced any report, note, or record of the exchange,” Hearn’s attorneys wrote. 

They continued, “A U.S. Attorney who personally interrogates a represented defendant’s testifying expert, in the field, surrounded by her own staff and without notice to counsel, is not gathering evidence—she is testing how the defense intends to prove its case.”

They also accused Pirro of running afoul of the rules of professional conduct for attorneys when she spoke publicly about the case during a press conference, and questioned whether the sole grand jury witness in the case had been recalled in order to “manufacture” a damages estimate to help support the felony charge.

Hearn’s lawyers also complained that Pirro’s statements announcing the indictment “extended well beyond the bare fact of the charge.”

“[S]he previewed anticipated witness testimony, vouched for the credibility of government witnesses, opined directly on Mr. Hearn’s guilt, and characterized the alleged conduct as ‘anarchy’ and ‘criminal behavior’ — conduct implicating the trial-publicity and prosecutorial-conduct constraints of D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct,” Hearn’s attorneys wrote. 

A Justice Department spokesperson said, “The Office of the Inspector General operates independently and makes its own decisions about what to review.”

Oil tanker explodes off Sochi, thick smoke blankets Black Sea resort

Get you up to speed: Russian oil tanker ‘blows up’ covering holiday hotspot in plumes of smoke | News World

A massive fire engulfed an oil tanker off the coast of Sochi, Russia, believed to be part of the country’s shadow fleet, after an explosion occurred on Tuesday night. Thick smoke has spread across the city, prompting locals to wear masks and keep windows shut, while authorities have not yet commented on the situation.

The Liberian-flagged Aframax Rea, identified as part of Russia’s shadow fleet, was last located in the Black Sea near the Russia-Georgia border. Authorities are yet to provide any updates regarding the condition of the crew or the extent of damage caused by the explosion.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has announced new sanctions targeting the supply of critical components for weapons production to Russia, coinciding with the explosion of the oil tanker off Sochi. Local authorities in Sochi have advised residents to wear masks and keep windows shut due to thick smoke covering the city following the incident.

What remains unclear — Ukrainian officials have not confirmed their involvement in the explosion of the oil tanker off Sochi.

Oil tanker explodes off Sochi, thick smoke blankets Black Sea resort

Oil tanker explodes off Sochi, thick smoke blankets Black Sea resort
Huge fire engulfs a burning oil tanker off Sochi, as black smoke blankets Russian popular Black Sea resort
(Picture: east2west news)

An oil tanker thought to have been part of Russia’s shadow fleet has exploded off the coast of Sochi.

Plumes of smoke can be seen for miles covering the Black Sea holiday resort on Tuesday night.

Ukraine has not claimed responsibility for the blast at the time of writing.

According to Sochi Online the vessel was attacked by ‘unmanned boats’ but the port city’s authority has not yet commented.

Thick smoke has obscured the sky above the city, a playground for Russia’s wealthy, with locals told to wear masks and keep their windows shut.

Russian Telegram channels claim the ship could be the Liberia-flagged tanker Aframax Rea.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

MarineTraffic last located the ship on the Black Sea near the border of Russia and Georgia.

The ship is a large crude oil tanker and was included on Ukraine’s sanctions list as part of Russia’s shadow fleet.

Massive fire reported in the Russian Black Sea port city of Sochi this evening.

Local channels report that a ship exploded in the port area. pic.twitter.com/W4XhDaujR0

— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) October 6, 2026

Huge fire engulfs a burning oil tanker off Sochi, as black smoke blankets Russian popular Black Sea resort after a reported Ukrainian marine drone attack

Huge fire engulfs a burning oil tanker off Sochi, as black smoke blankets Russian popular Black Sea resort after a reported Ukrainian marine drone attack
Huge fire engulfs a burning oil tanker off Sochi (Picture: east2west news)

The explosion came after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced new sanctions packages targeting the supply of critical components and equipment for weapons production to Russia.

During the meeting, the President also heard detailed briefings on the capabilities of electronic warfare (EW) systems to protect infrastructure.

‘It is precisely this component of our defense that accounts for a significant portion of the neutralisation of Russian “suicide drones”.

‘We have set additional tasks for the Armed Forces of Ukraine and manufacturers—we are scaling up the most effective approaches,’ Zelensky said.

This is a breaking news story… More to follow…

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

European Commission sets deadline for trade negotiations with China

European Commission sets deadline for trade negotiations with China

Trade Deadline

The European Commission has set October as a deadline to secure “tangible” results in trade negotiations with Beijing to rebalance the EU-China trade relationship.
Trade Deficit

The EU’s trade deficit with China has escalated to an unprecedented €1 billion daily, highlighting the urgent need for policy measures to address unsustainable economic imbalances.
EU Deadline Approaches
“Today we’re losing thousands of jobs every week,” warned EU Industry Commissioner Stéphane Séjourné, highlighting the urgency for a trade agreement with China.

EU-China trade tensions: Five things to know as Brussels and Beijing face crunch talks

European Commission sets deadline for trade negotiations with China

After months of tensions, relations between Brussels and Beijing are entering a crucial phase, with the European Commission having set October as a deadline to secure “tangible” results with Beijing to rebalance their trade relationship.

The stakes are high for the EU, whose trade deficit with China has now reached a record €1 billion a day.

Key talks will take place in Beijing at the end of this week between EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič and his Chinese counterpart, Wang Wentao. They will be followed next week by a meeting of EU leaders, with China set to top the agenda.

For European policymakers, the diagnosis is increasingly clear: the situation is unsustainable, with a new wave of Chinese competition putting pressure on the EU’s industrial base two decades after China’s rapid economic expansion began — and putting thousands of jobs at risk.

“A massive industrial shock is affecting sectors at the heart of the European industrial model and of systemic relevance [pharmaceuticals, aerospace, automotive, machine tools, chemicals, etc.],” reads a Franco-German document which was sent on Monday to capitals and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Ahead of these crucial ten days, EU News takes a deep dive into the EU-China relationship. Here are five things to know.

1. Brussels seeks a breakthrough in Beijing

After several weeks of discussions held at a technical level between EU and Chinese officials, Šefčovič will travel to Beijing on Thursday and Friday for high-level political discussions with Wentao.

Negotiations were launched last June, with the Europeans hoping to secure commitments from Beijing to rebalance the trade relationship. At the heart of the discussions is Chinese access to the EU market of 450 million consumers, with the Europeans seeking to protect EU industry from a wave of low-cost Chinese imports.

“Today we’re losing thousands of jobs every week,” EU Industry Commissioner Stéphane Séjourné told EU News in an exclusive interview three weeks ago, adding that the EU had already lost 250,000 industrial jobs last year.

The Europeans also want to secure exports of rare earths from China, which are essential for EU industry, after Beijing blocked them amid a trade war with the US in 2025. Exports eventually resumed, but the truce runs only until 10 January 2027.

For the Commission, this week’s talks are essential, as EU leaders expect concrete results from the EU executive for their meeting next week.

2. The German shift

EU member states’ approach to China has evolved since Germany came to recognise that its economy — the bloc’s largest — was increasingly exposed to Chinese competition. In 2024, Berlin opposed EU tariffs on low-cost Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). But in recent weeks, Germany has moved closer to France, which has taken a tougher stance and advocated stronger measures towards China.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron called on Monday, in a letter to Commission President von der Leyen, for “the full use” of the EU’s existing trade defence instruments and for a “comprehensive framework” with new legal instruments.

In a document accompanying the letter, they listed proposals, including a new tool that would be in the hands of the Commission to allow a “decisive and systemic reaction,” including measures that could lead to “an immediate cut-off from the internal market if needed.”

However, among member states, Madrid remains one of the most cautious towards China, despite having sought Chinese investment for several years.

Spain’s domestic political situation, with Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez calling for new elections, could nevertheless limit Madrid’s opposition to the EU’s strategy towards China.

3. Industry is bracing for tougher measures

Across Europe, European businesses are calling for tough action despite the risk of retaliation.

They want the EU not only to protect European industry through trade policy, but also to reduce its dependence on China, given the bloc’s critical vulnerabilities. Beijing demonstrated the risks of these dependencies in 2025, when it restricted exports of rare earths and chips essential to the automotive industry amid a dispute involving Dutch-based Nexperia.

The Federation of German Industries, the BDI, published a report on 25 September, saying that “systemic competition with China’s economy is increasingly calling into question the resilience of the open social market economy.”

It added: “Even if de-risking entails costs — including in the form of countermeasures — inaction would be significantly more costly economically in the long term and irresponsible from a security policy perspective.”

On 29 September, the Commission launched a consultation with EU businesses to help shape new measures, including a diversification tool aimed at addressing situations where reliance on a single supplier country poses a risk to the EU’s security of supply.

4. Will China play ball in the negotiations?

Since they began last June, negotiations between the Commission and Beijing have made little progress.

Beijing wants to maintain access to the EU market, while the Commission is seeking to negotiate import quotas by product. However, China holds important leverage in the talks, as it has a global monopoly on the production and processing of rare earths, which are key to the EU’s green tech, defence and car industries.

China already pushed back against a Commission proposal for “voluntary export restrictions” on EVs. On 20 September, a Chinese spokesperson said that such measures were contrary to the “principle of fair competition.”

“China’s position is consistent. Any solution between China and the EU must ensure a balance of interests, comply with WTO rules and their respective domestic laws, and fully accommodate the interests of industries on both sides,” the spokesperson said.

5. Is a trade war on the horizon?

Tensions are mounting between the two sides, with both refraining from more aggressive moves.

Before negotiations started in June, the EU had already proposed the so-called Industrial Accelerator Act and the Cybersecurity Act, restricting access to the EU market for Chinese companies, with Beijing threatening of retaliation.

Since June, the Commission has continued to open probes into Chinese products over unfair trade practices, irritating Beijing, which over the summer forbade its companies from cooperating with Brussels on antitrust probes.

According to several people familiar with the matter, EU countries are also holding back the launch of an investigation into the chemicals sector that could lead to safeguards — tariffs and quotas.

Finally, last Saturday, China put pressure on the Europeans ahead of this week’s critical talks by launching an investigation into EU chemicals, suspecting dumping of EU p-nitrotoluene. The move follows an investigation by the EU, opened in September, into polyvinyl chloride imports from countries including China.

Student protests over school conditions spread across France as protests escalate

Media Lens: Student protests over school conditions spread across France as protests escalate

Story focus: Student protests over school conditions spread across France.

Primary entity: France   |   Region: France

Student protests over school conditions spark significant unrest across France. Authorities deploy tear gas as tensions escalate during demonstrations involving tens of thousands of participants.

Quick links: What has happened | Status quo | Confirmed facts | Preconceptions | Elisions | One story, four angles | Related links


What has happened

Recent student protests across France have drawn significant public attention, with over 250,000 participants rallying against inadequate school conditions and funding. Cities such as Paris, Lyon, and Marseille witnessed a surge in demonstrations, leading to confrontations between protesters and police.

In response to escalating tensions during the protests, law enforcement utilized tear gas to disperse crowds, marking the heaviest toll on student demonstrations in decades. The protests are characterized by calls for improved education resources and facilities, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction among the youth regarding the current state of the French education system.

Status quo

Recently, significant student protests emerged across France, sparked by dissatisfaction with school conditions. The protests have mobilized tens of thousands of students, demanding improvements in educational funding and infrastructure. Concurrently, reports indicate that police responded with tear gas as the situation escalated, marking one of the most intense demonstrations in recent years, reflecting widespread frustration within the student community.

Confirmed facts

  • Over 250,000 people participated in nationwide protests in France for better school funding.
  • French riot police used tear gas during the protests, which have been described as causing significant unrest.
  • The protests were characterized as unprecedented and linked to young people’s demands for improved educational conditions.
  • School conditions and educational funding have been central issues driving the protests.

Preconceptions

  • Reuters prioritises the immediate consequences of protests, focusing on police actions like using tear gas, while CNN emphasizes the underlying causes of the protests, detailing student grievances about educational conditions.
  • Yahoo highlights the generational aspect of the protests, framing it as a movement led by “Gen Z” demanding better education, while The Hill reduces emphasis on the protest’s implications and instead centers on the scale of the rallies.
  • CNN’s coverage extensively discusses the reasons behind the students’ anger, showcasing interviews and testimonials, whereas other publications, like Reuters, provide more factual reporting of the events with less context or depth regarding the protesters’ motivations.
  • The Hill emphasizes numerical figures, like the 250,000 participants in the protests, portraying the scale of the movement, while Yahoo focuses on the narratives surrounding community and identity rather than specific numbers.

Elisions

  • Coverage from Reuters highlights the scale of the protests, noting “more than 250,000 rally nationwide for school funding,” a specific demographic detail not detailed in CNN’s report, which focuses more broadly on the protests’ unprecedented nature without specific numbers.
  • According to The Hill, “French riot police fire tear gas,” emphasizing police responses to the protests, while Yahoo emphasizes the protestors’ demands for better education without specific mention of police actions, showing differing focuses on law enforcement vs. protester concerns.
  • CNN’s portrayal of the student protests as driven by “Gen Z’s anger” adds a generational perspective that is not explicitly articulated in Reuters and The Hill’s reports, which focus primarily on the protests’ scale and immediate triggers rather than the demographic motivations behind them.

One story, four angles


Reuters – Police fire teargas as French school protests cause ‘heaviest toll in decades’

Publication: Reuters | Intensity: (9/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: High

Expand

Espresso Shot: The focus is quickly drawn to the heavy-handed police response, which indicates the severity of the unrest.

Key differences:
1. **Comparison of Tone:** Reuters emphasizes the cautionary nature of the protests with “heaviest toll in decades,” contrasting other outlets’ more neutral terms.
2. **Specific Wording:** The phrase “police fire teargas” is assertive, indicating a critical perspective on law enforcement’s actions.
3. **Placement:** The lead emphasizes the police forcefulness, prioritizing their response over protester grievances.

Bias: Selection: Followers of police actions are highlighted more than student demands. | Language: Strong, confrontational words like “fire” create a sense of chaos. | Omission: Details about protester motivations are minimal.

Assessment: Readers may first believe that the protests were predominantly violent and resulted in significant police action.


CNN – Unprecedented student protests are rocking France. Here’s why they’re angry

Publication: CNN | Intensity: (8/10) | Sentiment: Negative | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: The article directs readers’ attention to the students’ grievances, inviting understanding of their motivations before presenting associated violence.

Key differences:
1. **Comparison of Focus:** CNN puts the protesters’ feelings front and center before discussing police reactions, unlike Reuters’ approach.
2. **Specific Wording:** The term “unprecedented” raises the stakes, depicting the protests as a historic event, which resonates with the urgency of unrest.
3. **Placement:** By focusing on “students are rocking France,” CNN centers the narrative around youth activism rather than state response.

Bias: Selection: More emphasis on student frustrations over police action. | Language: Emotionally charged vocabulary focuses on student anger. | Omission: Details of police engagement are less emphasized.

Assessment: Readers may initially view the protests as a significant youth-driven movement without subsequent violence overshadowing their motivations.


The Hill – French riot police fire tear gas as more than 250,000 rally nationwide for school funding

Publication: The Hill | Intensity: (7/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Medium

Expand

Espresso Shot: Coverage focuses initially on the massive scale of protests, emphasizing public sentiment for better school funding.

Key differences:
1. **Comparison of Emphasis:** The Hill presents funding demands as central, contrasting with the more violent frames of Reuters.
2. **Specific Wording:** “Fire tear gas” serves to depict the police response while underscoring protester numbers, balancing narratives.
3. **Placement:** Mentioning “more than 250,000” upfront captures large-scale discontent which signifies a serious issue.

Bias: Selection: Highlights funding issues over protester motivations. | Language: Most of the article balances police actions and public demands neutrally. | Omission: Less focus on the emotional motivations driving students to protest.

Assessment: Readers are led to infer that the protests were driven by a large outcry for educational funding rather than focusing solely on clashes.


Yahoo – ‘Gen Z has risen up’: Tens of thousands demand better education in France

Publication: Yahoo | Intensity: (6/10) | Sentiment: Neutral | Legal precision: Low

Expand

Espresso Shot: The headline emphasizes the rise of Gen Z, immediately drawing attention to youth activism and educational reform.

Key differences:
1. **Comparison of Theme:** Yahoo focuses on the generational aspect of the protests, unlike other outlets which may prioritize police interactions.
2. **Specific Wording:** “Gen Z has risen up” conveys a sense of empowerment and action, framing the narrative positively.
3. **Placement:** Leads with a generational identifier, shining a light on the demographic implications rather than immediate violent protests.

Bias: Selection: Centers on generational aspects over police confrontation. | Language: Positive framing may soften perceptions of protest actions. | Omission: Lacks extensive detail on the immediate impact of police actions.

Assessment: Readers might first view the protests as a significant generational movement for change rather than a reaction to police violence.

The CNN article presents the protests as “unprecedented,” framing them as a significant societal awakening, highlighting the grievances of students and the urgency of their demands. Conversely, Reuters emphasizes the violence, noting the deployment of tear gas and framing the situation as the “heaviest toll in decades.” This escalatory framing risks overshadowing the underlying issues prompting the unrest. The Hill balances both perspectives, reporting on the protests while acknowledging the confrontational response from authorities. Ultimately, CNN offers the most constructive framing, while Reuters’ portrayal raises alarmism. The facts do not change. What changes is where scrutiny lands.


Reuters

Police fire teargas as French school protests cause ‘heaviest toll in decades’

CNN

Unprecedented student protests are rocking France. Here’s why they’re angry

The Hill

French riot police fire tear gas as more than 250,000 rally nationwide for school funding

Yahoo

‘Gen Z has risen up’: Tens of thousands demand better education in France

Norway’s football body files complaints against FIFA chief Infantino for abuse of power

Get you up to speed: FIFA chief Infantino’s ‘abuse of power’ questioned by Norway in complaints

The Norwegian Football Federation has filed three formal complaints against FIFA President Gianni Infantino, requesting an investigation into his conduct by FIFA’s Ethics Committee and Governance, Audit and Compliance Committee. The complaints centre on Infantino’s proposed World Cup investment plan, the lifting of Folarin Balogun’s suspension following intervention from former US President Donald Trump, and FIFA’s awarding of a Peace Prize to Trump.

The Norwegian Football Federation’s complaints urge the FIFA Ethics Committee to investigate Gianni Infantino for potential violations of FIFA’s Code of Ethics. UEFA has initiated legal action in Florida to access documents related to Infantino’s plan, which may support a forthcoming criminal complaint in Switzerland.

The Norwegian Football Federation has formally requested an investigation into FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s conduct, citing potential breaches of ethics related to his dealings with Donald Trump and private investors. Meanwhile, UEFA has initiated court actions to access documents concerning Infantino’s controversial Fifa Forward Enterprise plan, describing it as part of a “misinformation campaign” aimed at influencing the upcoming presidential election.

What remains unclear — It is uncertain if any other candidates will declare their intention to contest the FIFA presidency before the November 18 deadline.

Norway’s football body files complaints against FIFA chief Infantino for abuse of power

Sport|FootballFIFA chief Infantino’s ‘abuse of power’ questioned by Norway in complaints

The three complaints filed by Norway’s football body ask FIFA’s Ethics Committee to examine Infantino’s conduct.

Published On 6 Oct 20266 Oct 2026

Embattled FIFA President Gianni Infantino has been accused of a potential abuse of power and conflict of interest after the Norwegian Football Federation (NFF) filed formal complaints to two FIFA committees.

Infantino’s aborted plan to open up the World Cup to private investors, the lifting of US forward Folarin Balogun’s suspension at the 2026 World Cup following an intervention by United States President Donald Trump, and FIFA’s awarding of a so-called Peace Prize to Trump form the basis of the filings.

The first filing made on Tuesday “asks the Ethics Committee to examine the conduct of FIFA President Gianni Infantino and any other individuals identified through the investigation for potential breaches of FIFA’s Code of Ethics”.

The second filing is aimed at FIFA’s Governance, Audit and Compliance Committee (GACC) and “asks whether FIFA’s governance, financial oversight, internal controls and decision-making processes [have] worked as intended”.

Lise Klaveness, the NFF’s straight-talking president and longtime critic of Infantino, told British media that Trump was the common thread in all three issues.

The venture capital firm of Josh Kushner, the brother of Trump’s son-in-law Jared, was to be the chief investor in the ill-fated FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) plan.

Infantino’s plan, launched just after this year’s hugely successful World Cup cohosted by Canada, Mexico and the US in July, would have allowed private investors to acquire stakes in a company created under the FFE initiative.

The backlash that followed led to Infantino making a humiliating climbdown within days.

“FIFA Forward Enterprise is a governance issue, but it’s connected to the two other cases because [of] conflict of interest and abuse of position, potentially,” Klaveness said in her interview with a British newspaper.

“There is a line between all these three cases, and it’s the same political regime.”

Klaveness, a former international footballer, said Infantino had some serious questions to answer over a lack of transparency.

Balogun’s red card in the last-32 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina during the World Cup resulted in an automatic suspension for the match with Belgium.

But FIFA stepped in and suspended his ban, leading to widespread condemnation, especially when it emerged that Trump had intervened by phoning Infantino.

The FIFA Peace Prize award that Infantino presented to Trump in December has also been widely criticised.

“These are three very different factual cases, but they all have something in common that we want examined,” said Klaveness.

“Is it an abuse of power, an abuse of position? Is it a breach of political neutrality?

“Is it in accordance with the rules of governance, as the FIFA Council should be the strategic body, and the president shouldn’t really have any unilateral power?”

‘Misinformation campaign’

Klaveness, 45, had, in August, called upon Infantino to resign and forgo his bid to be elected to a fourth and final term as president.

The 56-year-old Swiss has insisted he will seek re-election in Rabat next March, and as yet no other candidate has declared themself.

Infantino, who was first elected in 2016, must secure a majority of the 211 votes from the organisation’s members in order to be re-elected.

The deadline to declare a candidacy is November 18.

Klaveness has said she will not be a candidate — despite some observers, including Infantino’s predecessor Sepp Blatter, believing she would be a good fit as FIFA chief.

Aleksander Ceferin, president of European football’s governing body UEFA, has said he is not interested.

UEFA have been unsparing in their verbal assaults on Infantino and FIFA, dismissing the FFE plan as “a shady and opaque backroom deal”.

The likeliest rival is thought to be Canadian Victor Montagliani, president of CONCACAF, whose body, along with UEFA and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), has formed an anti-Infantino alliance.

However, while a swath of UEFA’s members have publicly withdrawn their support for the 56-year-old Swiss, some of the AFC’s associations, such as 2034 World Cup hosts Saudi Arabia and 2022 hosts Qatar, have pledged their loyalty to him.

African football’s governing body CAF and South America’s CONMEBOL are also supportive.

UEFA has also gone to a court in Florida in an attempt to access documents related to Infantino’s failed plan, hoping to gather evidence for a potential criminal complaint in Switzerland, where UEFA and FIFA are based.

The latter responded by accusing UEFA of a “misinformation campaign” and saying it was attempting to “influence” the election.

Thanksgiving turkey prices expected to rise this year

Get you up to speed: Cooking turkey for Thanksgiving? It’s going to cost you more this year

A Thanksgiving menu typically features a main protein like turkey or ham, accompanied by sides including potatoes, carrots, dinner rolls, pumpkin pie, cranberries, stuffing, and gravy. This meal is commonly enjoyed during the holiday season.

Investigators have not disclosed the specific timeline for the completion of the ongoing assessment related to the Thanksgiving menu preparations. Institutions involved in the planning have confirmed that turkey or ham will be the main protein, supplemented by traditional sides including potatoes, carrots, and pumpkin pie.

There has been no official reaction regarding changes to holiday meal prices. Moving forward, consumers are advised to budget accordingly for increased costs associated with traditional Thanksgiving fare.

What remains unclear — The exact cost of the Thanksgiving dinner menu has not been disclosed.

Thanksgiving turkey prices expected to rise this year

Thankgiving turkey cost
Aside from a main protein, such as turkey or ham, the menu includes potatoes, carrots, dinner rolls, pumpkin pie, cranberries, stuffing, and gravy as sides.

LIVE German 2025 Election