Chris Rose
Chris Rose@ArchRose90
A Black Lives Matters protest in London regarding Chris Kaba. Looks like the white, middle class organisers forget to invite any black people.
Tommy Robinson
Tommy Robinson@TRobinsonNewEra
In the wake of death of UK political prisoner, Peter Lynch, who was fast tracked into prison for essentially shouting in the street. The grandfather was ultimately sentenced to death. Pakistani family who attacked police at Manchester Airport, STILL haven't even been charged.
Turning Point UK
Turning Point UK@TPointUK
Tiny ‘Black Lives Matter’ crowd gathers outside the Old Bailey courtrooms to protest the not guilty verdict of the police officer who shot violent criminal Chris Kaba. Kaba rammed his car repeatedly into armed police officers’ cars. BLM is finished in the UK.

Get you up to speed: Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii law restricting guns on private property that’s open to public

The Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law that restricted concealed-carry permit holders from bringing firearms onto private property open to the public in a 6 to 3 decision in the case Wolford v. Lopez. The ruling upheld the argument made by a group of gun owners and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition, affirming that the restriction violated the Second Amendment.

The Supreme Court’s ruling follows a legal dispute initiated in 2023, when three residents and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition challenged the state’s carry restrictions. Hawaii’s law, described as the “vampire rule,” was enacted after the Court’s 2022 landmark decision on gun rights, and currently stands alongside similar laws in only four other states.

Hawaii’s government has signalled its intention to review its firearm regulations in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, which invalidated the state’s “vampire rule” restricting concealed-carry permit holders. The decision is expected to prompt legislative changes, as Hawaii navigates its remaining firearm restrictions, particularly those in sensitive locations such as schools and government buildings.

What remains unclear — It is not specified how the Supreme Court’s ruling will affect the enforcement of other existing firearms restrictions in Hawaii.

Supreme Court invalidates Hawaii law on guns in publicly accessible private property

Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Hawaii restriction that prohibits concealed-carry permit holders from bringing their firearms onto private property that is open to the public.

In a 6 to 3 decision in the case Wolford v. Lopez, the high court sided with a group of gun owners and a gun-rights group who argued that Hawaii’s rule restricting where they could carry firearms violates the Second Amendment. 

The justices found unconstitutional the Hawaii law requiring people with concealed-carry permits to receive permission before bringing their guns onto private property that is open to the public — places like gas stations, restaurants or shops.

The ruling in favor of the gun owners follows the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in which the high court recognized for the first time that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry a firearm outside the home.

That decision laid out a new framework for courts to apply when determining the constitutionality of a gun restriction, which requires the government to show that a measure is rooted in the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation. The first test of that new standard came in 2024, when the Supreme Court upheld a federal law barring people subject to domestic violence restraining orders from having guns. 

The high court said last week in a case involving a federal firearms restriction that the government cannot automatically disarm people who regularly use marijuana and are not dangerous. 

The Supreme Court’s ruling does not impact Hawaii’s other restrictions on guns in places like bars, beaches or parks, which were not at issue in the case, or sensitive locations like schools or government buildings.

Hawaii’s law, which has been dubbed the “vampire rule,” requires armed concealed-carry permit holders to seek permission before entering private property that is open to the public. Carrying a gun without that permission is a misdemeanor that is punishable by up to one year in prison.

Hawaii is one of five states with laws presumptively restricting carry by license-holders on private property, though similar measures in New York, California and Maryland have been blocked by courts. In the remaining 45 states, licensed handgun owners can generally carry arms onto publicly-accessible private property.

The limits on the places people in Hawaii could bring their firearms were signed into law following the Supreme Court’s 2022 landmark gun rights decision.

The dispute before the Supreme Court dates back to 2023, when three Maui County residents and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition challenged the state’s default rule as a violation of the Second Amendment. A federal district court sided with the challengers, finding Hawaii’s restriction likely violates the Second Amendment as applied to property that is accessible to the public. 

But after the state appealed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld Hawaii’s law.

The Trump administration backed the gun owners in the case and argued that the measure was “blatantly unconstitutional” and effectively prevented public carry, as any armed permit holder risked committing a crime simply by stopping to put gas in their car or running errands at a grocery store.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in January and appeared likely to side with the gun owners.

Get you up to speed: Shady spyware firm linked to hacking journalists held talks with UK officials | News UK

British officials engaged in discussions with Intellexa, a spyware company known for its Predator software, which has targeted journalists and was sanctioned by the US. The talks reportedly took place in the UK, but specifics regarding the department involved have not been disclosed.

British officials engaged in discussions with Intellexa, the company behind the Predator spyware, during multiple trips to the UK, as revealed during a recent court trial. In February, an Athens court convicted four executives from Intellexa for violating privacy laws, with an appeals hearing scheduled for December 11.

British officials have held talks with Intellexa representatives, whose spyware was implicated in targeting journalists and has been sanctioned by the US. Following these revelations, campaigners expressed concern over potential use of the technology by the UK government, urging transparency and warning that spyware like Predator should be banned.

What remains unclear — It is not specified which UK department or agency met with the Intellexa sales engineer during his visits.

Spyware firm Intellexa linked to journalist hacking in talks with UK officials

Spyware firm Intellexa linked to journalist hacking in talks with UK officials
Intellexa spyware was used to infect phones and extract personal data (Picture: Getty/WTX)

British officials held talks with a spyware company whose software was used to target journalists and was later sanctioned by the US, WTX can reveal.

Officials met salesmen from Intellexa, whose surveillance application Predator was used to spy on at least 87 people in Greece and was sold to authoritarian regimes across the world.

Four business executives linked to the spyware developer were found guilty by an Athens court in February of violating the confidentiality of telephone communications and illegally accessing personal data and conversations.

During the trial, an Intellexa employee testified that he travelled to the UK to try sell one of their products, according to court documents obtained by WTX.

Sales engineer Panagiotis Koutsios revealed that he pitched to officials details of Intellexa’s ‘Big Data Analytics’ software, which multiple sources said was a ‘component’ of Predator.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

A political scandal erupted in Greece in 2022 when it emerged that the phone of journalist Thanasis Koukakis had been infected with Predator spyware after pressing on a scam link.

A top opposition politician Nikos Androulakis had also been targeted with the same link, and it was discovered that both men also had their phones wiretapped by Greece’s EYP National Intelligence Service.

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM - SEPTEMBER 08: Greek financial journalist Thanasis Koukakis, spied on by state intelligence services, attends the session of the European Parliament's research committee on Pegasus and equivalent spyware use in Brussels, Belgium on September 08, 2022. (Photo by Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
The phone of Thanasis Koukakis was targeted with Predator (Picture: Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

The crisis – dubbed the ‘Greek Watergate’ – led to the resignation of the EYP chief and a close aide of the Prime Minister, although the government insisted that no law enforcement agency had ever used Predator.

The sophisticated spyware can infiltrate mobile phones, access messages and photos, and extract data from a device.

Intellexa, an Athens-based Israeli company which developed and distributed Predator, was sanctioned by the US in March 2024 for being a ‘security risk’ after ‘targeting US officials, journalists and policy experts’.

In February this year, a court in Athens found Intellexa’s founder Tal Dilian, his partner Sara Hamou, and two former Greek executives of the company, guilty of spyware-related offences.

WTX has uncovered that sales trips to the United Kingdom were discussed multiple times during the trial.

Koutsios, a sales engineer at Intellexa from April 2021 to May 2022, testified that he made at least one journey to the United Kingdom to present the firm’s software, alongside a company salesperson called Ami Weiner.

Koutsios said he ‘only’ ever met ‘with government officials’ to make sales presentations, and described holding talks in ‘state-owned’ buildings on his trips.

He refused to reveal which UK department or agency he met with and the government declined to comment. He also testified he did not know if the product was eventually sold.

Koutsios told the court his job was to present on Intellexa’s ‘Big Data Analytics’ software, which changed names at least three times during his stint at the company.

CANADA - 2026/02/18: In this photo illustration, the Intellexa logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Intellexa was sanctioned by the US for targetting American officials and journalists (Picture: Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Koutsios acknowledged that this could include ‘personal data’ and that Predator was a possible method for collecting the data to be analysed.

He told lawyers: ‘From the moment we spoke only with governmental organisations, we understood that what we were showing … was something sensitive.’

The sales engineer insisted, however, that he had no knowledge about Predator or other illegal surveillance while he was at Intellexa and that was not part of his sales presentations.

But Zacharias Kesses, a lawyer for a victims of the Predator affair, told WTX that there is ‘no indication’ in the case file ‘that Big Data Analytics was ever sold as a standalone product’.

He added: ‘The evidence points to it being offered as an additional service, closely tied to and dependent upon the Predator platform.’

WTX has also seen a press release from Intellexa, dating back to 2019, which states that the company ‘integrates several product lines into a complete solution’, including ‘infection and data extraction systems’ and ‘data fusion and analytics systems’ among them.

Amnesty International has reported that the Predator system was identified in two countries Koutsios admitted visiting – Kazakhstan and Mongolia.

Koutsios later admitted in court that a year after leaving Intellexa, he continued selling ‘the same software’ through remote work company Remote Greece from May 2023 to March 2024, after the Predator scandal broke out.

Greek outlet To Vima reported that Remote was allegedly used as a channel to continue employing former Intellexa employees at the time the firm was sanctioned, with Koutsios testifying that the ‘accounting department was the same’ when he was there.

WTX has also seen evidence that allegedly documents a work trip made by another Intellexa employee to the UK.

Police officers are seen on the street near Buckingham Palace in London, United Kingdom, on February 17, 2026. (Photo by Klaudia Radecka/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Koutsios testified that he only ever met with government officials on his work trips (Picture: Klaudia Radecka/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

An expense report for plane and taxi fares – filed under the purpose ‘UK POC’ – was submitted by Vasileios Sevastos in May 2022. 

Concerns amongst campiagners

The revelation that Intellexa and UK officials held meeting has sparked concern from campaigners.

Big Brother Watch’s Head of Advocacy Jack Coulson said: ‘If the UK government has been considering using Intellexa technology, we should all be worried.

‘Democracies need to stand up against spyware agencies and the government should be open with the public if it has been using this software and why.’

Amnesty International, which has conducted numerous investigations into Intellexa, claimed the company ‘is linked with a litany of human rights abuses stretching over many years’.

Rebecca White, a researcher in their Security Lab, said: ‘If an Intellexa representative were to have met with UK government officials to try to sell their wares… this should of course raise concerns.’

She added: ‘The surveillance industry thrives on an absence of transparency and we need governments to be proactive in disclosing information.’ 

White also said that ‘highly invasive spyware’ such as Predator ‘cannot be human rights compliant and should therefore be banned.’

This sentiment was supported by Lord David Alton, Chair of Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights.

He told WTX: ‘Software targeting the phones of journalists, politicians, pro-democracy and human rights activists, forms part of a systemic and malign attempt to harvest personal data, to use Big Brother surveillance, and to subvert our democracies.

Intellexa Co-CEO Tal Dilian poses for a picture at his house in Limassol, Cyprus, April 22, 2020. Picture taken April 22, 2020. To match Special Report HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/SPY REUTERS/Yiannis Kourtoglou REFILE - CORRECTING SURNAME
Intellexa founder Tal Dilian was one of four executives found guilty in Athens in February (Picture: REUTERS)

‘The US has been right to impose sanctions on those who are behind the Predator software. The UK should carefully examine the evidence and consider doing the same.’

However cyber security expert Professor Alan Woodward said he would be ‘surprised’ if Intellexa was trying to sell Predator to the UK, who he said would be ‘highly likely to stay well clear’ of commercial spyware firms.

He added that it is ‘plausible’ officials were interested in Intellexa’s big data analytics tools.

Prof Woodward explained: ‘The same tools can sometimes be used in unexpected government departments if they have the capability to help look for patterns that can spot anything from inefficiency to fraud.’

He continued: ‘I can imagine the government would be cautious about using them as a supplier if they are involved in other activities such as supplying spyware.’

The UK is leading international efforts to stop powerful hacking tools from spreading or being misused.

Britain and France launched the Pall Mall Process in February 2024, bringing together governments, companies and civil society to tackle commercial cyber intrusion tools and services.

What has Intellexa said?

A statement from Intellexa founder Tal Dilian, provided by his lawyer, said: ‘These allegations are neither new nor supported by any credible evidence.

‘For years, the same recycled narratives have been repeated through headlines, activist reports, and media speculation, yet no evidence has ever been presented linking me to any unlawful act.

‘Developing and providing intelligence technologies to law enforcement agencies worldwide is a must, and contribute to the well-being of each one of your readers.’

Sara Hamou and the other two defendants in the Intellexa case have also consistently denied all charges and wrongdoing, which Hamou reiterated to WTX in a statement.

Sanctions against Sara Hamou were also dropped by the US in 2025.

All four defendants are due to appear before an appeals court in Athens on December 11.

Remote said: ‘Remote takes its compliance obligations extremely seriously and has a thorough sanctions screening programme both at onboarding and throughout the employment relationship. We do not employ individuals in contravention of sanctions compliance or regulatory requirements. We will not be commenting further on confidential employment matters.’ 

The UK government and Panagiotis Koutsios declined to comment.

WTX approached the Greek government, Ami Weiner and Vasileios Sevastos for comment.

What to Watch

Amazon prime - TV & Netflix

We give you the best picks to binge on this week.

What to Watch

Love Sports

Get your pizza ordered with the latest Live Sports schedule.
Leave A Reply