Chris Rose
Chris Rose@ArchRose90
A Black Lives Matters protest in London regarding Chris Kaba. Looks like the white, middle class organisers forget to invite any black people.
Tommy Robinson
Tommy Robinson@TRobinsonNewEra
In the wake of death of UK political prisoner, Peter Lynch, who was fast tracked into prison for essentially shouting in the street. The grandfather was ultimately sentenced to death. Pakistani family who attacked police at Manchester Airport, STILL haven't even been charged.
Turning Point UK
Turning Point UK@TPointUK
Tiny ‘Black Lives Matter’ crowd gathers outside the Old Bailey courtrooms to protest the not guilty verdict of the police officer who shot violent criminal Chris Kaba. Kaba rammed his car repeatedly into armed police officers’ cars. BLM is finished in the UK.

Get you up to speed: The search for mysterious creature in Antarctica that could help cure skin cancer | News Weird

A team from the University of South Florida conducted a six-week expedition in Antarctica to study a species of ascidian, known as a sea squirt, which contains a bacterium capable of killing melanoma cancer cells. The research identified the organism’s potential cancer-fighting properties, and specimens collected will be analysed by multiple teams to assess their possible medical applications.

The six-week expedition led by the University of South Florida in Antarctica involved multiple diving operations to collect specimens at depths of 60 to 80 feet. Specimens gathered will be analysed by specialised research teams over the coming months to assess their potential medical applications, specifically targeting melanoma treatment.

The University of South Florida team has expressed optimism about the potential of the ascidian-derived bacterium to combat melanoma, with Professor Bill Baker stating that its selective toxicity makes it critical for drug development. Following the expedition, researchers will begin an extensive analysis of the specimens collected, a process expected to span months or even years, as they seek to uncover the compound’s medical applications.

What remains unclear — The specific timeline for analysing the specimens and understanding the compounds’ medical applications is not detailed.

Expedition in Antarctica explores sea squirt that may aid melanoma treatment

Expedition in Antarctica explores sea squirt that may aid melanoma treatment
Sea spiders were among the creatures seen by the Antarctic divers during the search (Picture: Courtesy of Sam Affoullouss and the Desert Research Institute/Cover Media)

A strange organism living in the icy waters of Antarctica could hold the key to curing melanoma skin cancer.

A team from the University of South Florida (USF) has returned from a six-week expedition to one of the most remote regions on Earth to study a species of ascidian, commonly known as a sea squirt, which contains a bacterium capable of killing melanoma cancer cells.

USF chemistry professor Bill Baker’s research has identified the organism’s potential cancer-fighting properties.

He is now helping to lead a US National Science Foundation-supported project aimed at understanding the compound in greater detail and assessing whether it could one day contribute to new treatments for melanoma patients.

coverimages55780401 ec5b
Researchers from the University of South Florida spent six weeks diving in Antarctica (Picture: Courtesy of Sam Affoullouss and the Desert Research Institute/Cover Media)

Professor Baker said: ‘We first discovered this ascidian produces a bacterium that contains a toxic compound that kills melanoma cancer cells while not harming normal human cells.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

‘That selectivity is critical in drug development because you want to treat the disease without harming the patient.’

For decades, Professor Baker has travelled to Antarctica to study marine organisms that may have pharmaceutical applications.

Previous discoveries by his team have led to patented compounds with potential uses in tackling diseases including drug-resistant malaria, cancer and antibiotic-resistant infections.

coverimages55780387 1284
The special species of ascidian, or sea squirt, contains a bacterium that kills melanoma cells while leaving normal human cells unharmed (Picture: Courtesy of Sam Affoullouss and the Desert Research Institute/Cover Media)

Researchers say Antarctica offers a unique natural laboratory because of its long geographical and environmental isolation.

Professor Baker added: ‘The continent is unique because it has been geographically and environmentally isolated for millions of years.

‘As a result, species in Antarctica have had time to evolve independently, leading to highly specialized organisms. The ascidians we study are adapted specifically to this environment and are not found anywhere else.’

coverimages55780385 eb05
Antarctica’s isolation means it’s a unique natural laboratory (Picture: Courtesy of Sam Affoullouss and the Desert Research Institute/Cover Media)

While Professor Baker advised the 2026 expedition from the United States, USF diving safety officer Ben Meister and postdoctoral researcher Sam Afoullouss represented the university on the Antarctic mission.

Afoullouss said: ‘Our expedition focused on determining where the ascidian’s melanoma-killing bacterium occurs and how widespread it is.

‘We also wanted to understand how it lives inside the organism and how that connects to the compounds linked to melanoma research.’

The ascidians studied during the expedition are typically found at depths of between 60 and 80ft, often attached to steep or vertical surfaces on the seafloor where strong currents provide a steady supply of nutrients.

coverimages55780362 fa8f
The expedition took six weeks and dives were around 25 to 35 minutes at a time (Picture: Courtesy of Sam Affoullouss and the Desert Research Institute/Cover Media)

Collecting the specimens required multiple dives as well as the deployment of remotely operated vehicles to investigate deeper waters and identify new collection sites along the Antarctic Peninsula.

Mr Meister said: ‘On average, our dives were about 25 to 35 minutes at a time with a maximum of 130 feet.

‘But in Antarctica, you’re dealing with ice, leopard seals, changing seas and sometimes very limited visibility.

‘Every dive must be carefully planned to balance getting the work done while keeping everyone safe.’

coverimages55780397 1234
The expedition focused on determining where the ascidian’s melanoma-killing bacterium occurs and how widespread it is (Picture: Courtesy of Sam Affoullouss and the Desert Research Institute/Cover Media)

Scientists say careful planning is essential not only for diver safety but also to ensure samples are collected and preserved correctly for laboratory analysis.

Maintaining the integrity of the specimens is considered crucial because even minor changes could affect understanding of how the compounds function.

Now that the expedition has concluded, researchers say the most important phase of the work is beginning.

Specimens collected during the mission will be analysed by multiple teams specialising in genetics, chemistry and biology.

The process is expected to take months, and potentially years, as scientists seek to understand the compounds and their possible medical applications.

coverimages55780404 06e7
The findings will have both medical and environmental significance (Picture: Courtesy of Sam Affoullouss and the Desert Research Institute/Cover Media)

Professor Baker said: ‘This research is important both environmentally and medically.

‘We are learning how organisms use symbiosis to survive in extreme conditions, which is still largely unknown in cold-water ecosystems like Antarctica.

‘Understanding the source and function of this compound is critical if we hope to develop it into a drug.’

Researchers say discoveries such as these represent the earliest stages of a lengthy scientific process, but could eventually help identify a cure for melanomas, as well as other complex diseases.

Comment now

Comments

Add WTX as a Preferred Source on Google

Add as preferred source

EU warns green bond initiative could benefit Chinese companies unfairly

Green Bond Initiative

The Global Green Bond Initiative aims to mobilise between €15 billion and €20 billion to fund sustainable infrastructure and climate-related projects in partner countries.
Strategic concerns
Without exclusion mechanisms for Chinese suppliers, the Green Bond Initiative risks enhancing third countries’ reliance on potentially risky technologies, impacting both security and energy grid stability in Europe.
Official Concern
“Having EU-financed projects built by Chinese companies is precisely what we want to avoid,” stated a Commission official regarding the Green Bond Initiative’s implications.

EU-backed green bonds risk financing Chinese clean tech in third countries

EU warns green bond initiative could benefit Chinese companies unfairly

The Global Green Bond Initiative is one of the EU’s largest financial instruments to fund sustainable infrastructure and climate-related projects with the bloc’s partner countries. Its declared aim is to mobilise between €15 and €20 billion in investments.

But European Commission and EU officials are now warning that some of these investments could end up benefiting Chinese companies, undermining Brussels‘ policy of diversifying away from Beijing in key supply chains.

In practice, the European Investment Bank (EIB) and other European development institutions will act as anchor investors and provide technical assistance for environment-related projects in third countries.

The green bonds may be used to finance solar farms in Algeria, wastewater treatment in India and a light rail line in the Dominican Republic.

Conceived during the previous legislative term as part of the European Green Deal, the governance framework was only finalised in April this year. In the intervening period, the geopolitical landscape has shifted dramatically.

“The main problem is that, given the market of renewable energy technologies, most of the money will likely go to Chinese companies,” a Commission official with direct knowledge of the matter told EU News. Like others who contributed to this story, they asked to be kept anonymous in order to speak freely.

There is particular concern over high-risk solar inverters, which the EU is trying to phase out. These introduce vulnerabilities in third countries connected with the European energy grid.

No China clause

The issue of “global macroeconomic imbalances” – a reference to China in all but name – will be the main topic of discussion at the European Council on Thursday.

But while Brussels has gradually shifted its trade policy toward Beijing into a defensive position, not all EU instruments have kept pace.

The Commission official pointed out that the Green Bond Initiative was conceived before the EU had fully developed its economic security doctrine – an effort to counter China’s growing dominance in key sectors, which is exerted via heavily subsidised firms that push competitors out of the market.

The upshot is that the EU-backed green bonds do not require partner countries to avoid Chinese suppliers and offer no incentive for them to do so.

The question of to handle Chinese suppliers in EU-funded projects abroad has long been a sticking point for European development finance. Brussels struggles to persuade third countries to buy from more expensive non-Chinese vendors unless it can cover the extra cost, and so far, it has been reluctant to do so.

But the imperative of excluding Chinese suppliers is not limited to supply chain dependencies that might be weaponised; it is also increasingly a matter of cybersecurity.

Cybersecurity risk

Last month, the European Commission circulated guidance requesting that all EU-funded projects generating renewable energy phase out high-risk power inverters – meaning Chinese-made ones – citing cybersecurity risks to the EU energy grid.

The concern is that firms that dominate in the solar inverter market, among them Huawei, might be able to remotely manipulate the energy grid, destabilise it, and in a worst-case scenario trigger full blackouts.

The Green Bond Initiative was given the green light before the Commission issued the guidance, which in any case only applies to projects outside the EU from 15 April 2027.

There are now concerns that the investment programme could both increase third countries’ exposure to risky Chinese technology and create security risks for Europe’s own energy infrastructure.

Energy grids do not operate in isolation, which is why phasing out Chinese inverters at home might make little sense if the same rules are not applied to Europe’s immediate neighbours. North African countries, many of which are part of the Green Bond Initiative, are the most exposed.

“Having EU-financed projects built by Chinese companies is precisely what we want to avoid,” a second Commission official told EU News, noting that the Mediterranean region is where China’s influence poses the highest risks.

Underlying tensions

The Commission has been pushing the EIB and other European investment institutions to apply the phase-out requirements for risky solar inverters across the board, but both institutions have pushed back and sought exemptions.

In the context of the Green Bond Initiative, since no exclusion mechanism exists, the problem may be as much about governance as procurement.

The Commission is expected to exert pressure on the initiative’s fund manager, Amundi, Europe’s largest asset manager. But it will have to do so against a project pipeline that appears to have been drawn up without those requirements in mind.

For investment banks, the priority is financial viability and return on investment, whereas supply chain considerations cannot translate into commercially unreasonable costs.

But in a context where critical dependencies are increasingly weaponised by China, and where the EU is increasingly serious about reducing its reliance on Beijing, geopolitical risk is becoming a decisive factor.

“The EIB wants exemptions on everything, the Commission is pushing back on the whole front,” a third EU official said. “The situation is still unclear; this back and forth will go on for a while.”

The European Commission did not reply to EU News’ request for comment by the time of publication. The EIB declined to comment.

What to Watch

Amazon prime - TV & Netflix

We give you the best picks to binge on this week.

What to Watch

Love Sports

Get your pizza ordered with the latest Live Sports schedule.
Leave A Reply