- Trump orders reduction in childhood vaccines as Kennedy’s research stalls
- Sainsbury’s halts facial recognition at London store after false accusation
- Twelve people killed in tourist bus crash on M3 motorway in Hungary
- EU proposes major tobacco tax overhaul, raising cigarette duties by 139%
- US economy shows signs of recovery as inflation rates begin to stabilize
- Thieves steal Renaissance masterworks from MuMe museum during Ferragosto holiday
- Grizzly bear escapes enclosure at Calgary Zoo before being recaptured
- Trump directs Pentagon to reduce military exercises with South Korea after its refusal to aid Iran’s denuclearisation efforts
UK public borrowing exceeds official forecast in September
FT.com Tweet
Government borrowing overshot official projections in September, which is a sign of the difficult fiscal position that the Chancellor faces as she puts the finishing touches on her first tax and spending budget.
CITY AM Tweet
Get you up to speed: RFK Jr.’s quiet hunt for autism culprits stalls as Trump orders baseless changes to childhood shots
President Trump has ordered a reduction in childhood vaccines, linking the shots to an increase in autism cases, despite a lack of evidence from health officials, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The directive, issued on August 10, has drawn confusion from medical groups and comes ahead of midterm elections in the United States.
The Department of Health and Human Services is currently reassessing the national vaccine schedule and exploring recommendations for reducing childhood immunisations based on guidance from peer countries. No conclusive evidence has yet been provided regarding the potential causes of the rise in autism diagnoses, despite extensive funding and research efforts led by health officials.
The Department of Health and Human Services stated that President Trump’s directive to limit childhood vaccinations aligns with their previous reassessment of the vaccine schedule but noted that no other peer country employs a similar strategy. HHS plans to examine all biologically plausible hypotheses related to autism and will share findings as they become available, although no timelines have been established for this research.
What remains unclear — The White House has not disclosed which routine vaccinations Mr. Trump believes could be linked to autism.
Trump orders reduction in childhood vaccines as Kennedy’s research stalls
President Trump has ordered a reduction in childhood vaccines — publicly faulting the shots for an increase in autism cases — even as the nation’s top health official, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has failed to produce evidence linking vaccinations to the disorder.
While the executive order released Aug. 10 does not directly mention autism, Mr. Trump’s demand to limit vaccine recommendations has puzzled leading medical groups, doctors, and political analysts alike. The directive landed less than 90 days before midterm elections, which Mr. Trump’s own pollsters have warned could be jeopardized by anti-vaccine rhetoric.
“The political timing, particularly for members on the Republican side in swing districts, is not good,” said Larry Bucshon, a former Republican congressman and retired doctor.
Mr. Trump’s willingness to gamble on the issue underscores the president’s impatience for his health secretary to deliver on a promise that he’d pinpoint a culprit for the sharp rise in autism diagnoses.
After more than a year, Kennedy and his close, anti-vaccine allies have blown past a deadline to turn up definitive answers in a multimillion-dollar research mission shrouded in secrecy, leaving the president to recycle debunked notions as he publicly assaults vaccines.
“This is about the most closed project that I’ve ever heard of,” Helen Tager-Flusberg, a renowned psychologist who runs the Coalition of Autism Scientists, said of Kennedy’s autism research efforts. “They’re treating it like the Manhattan Project in the 1940s. This is as opaque as it could possibly be.”
The White House did not answer questions about what research is informing the president’s opinions or which vaccines he believes could be linked to autism.
The Department of Health and Human Services said the president’s action builds on the agency’s January announcement that it was reassessing the nation’s vaccine schedule and recommended reducing childhood immunizations based on peer countries’ guidance. However, no other peer country separates the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine as the president has now ordered.
“As the secretary said, HHS will examine every biologically plausible hypothesis, follow the evidence wherever it leads, and make findings and actions available as they are ready,” HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said in an email.
Trump dreams of a “big day”
Mr. Trump especially has been enamored with finding autism’s cause, saying in August 2025 that it will be “such a big day” after Kennedy assured his boss that he had identified “clearly, almost certainly” factors causing autism that would soon be publicly revealed.
Decades of existing research and scientific studies show genetics is a leading factor. Environmental factors — including prenatal exposure to pollution, the age of the father, and maternal health — can also play a role.
But Kennedy has flatly rejected that science, often calling autism a “preventable disease.” As health secretary, he has spent millions of taxpayer dollars looking for root causes in a research effort that’s offered no public status updates and few details about who, or even which agency, is leading the effort.
Prominent autism advocacy groups, scientists, and researchers have not been consulted on the project. Nor have career scientists working at the federal health agencies, according to two officials KFF Health News is not naming because they were not authorized to speak on the record about the matter.
Requests to meet with Kennedy on the issue have been ignored, said Delancy Allred, public policy manager at the Autism Society. Allred said that other federal agencies, such as the Department of Education, have engaged more directly with leading autism advocacy groups during meetings.
“No one has gotten to Kennedy. No one has gotten to the secretary level, that I’m aware of,” Allred said. “I think he likes to isolate himself with folks that are in his domain and group.”
Indeed, Kennedy has relied on allies, who’ve joined him over the years on a crusade against childhood vaccines, to lead the agency’s autism research and strategy efforts. It’s a top priority for his closest adviser, Stefanie Spear, a former environmental activist and longtime confidant, according to the unnamed sources. Spear did not respond to requests to talk about the autism study.
William “Reyn” Archer III — a former Texas health official, trained obstetrician-gynecologist, and vaccine critic whom Kennedy hired as a senior adviser — has spent months acquiring Americans’ medical records for political appointees to research a link between vaccines and autism. The National Institutes of Health under Mr. Trump has also issued about $50 million in grants to scientists at universities around the country for autism research, although most of the studies are not scheduled to be completed for a few years.
In January, Kennedy also restocked the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee — an under-the-radar but influential group — with a full new slate of 21 members. His appointees include parents of autistic children, vaccine skeptics, and a doctor who was sued for “dangerous” autism treatment. It has met only once during Mr. Trump’s current term.
Late last month, the committee abruptly dropped a 336-page strategic plan that echoes some of Kennedy’s talking points: Federal researchers have focused too much on genetic links to autism, the plan suggests.
Diagnoses of autism, a neurodevelopmental condition that affects how people communicate and behave, have increased roughly fivefold over the past couple of decades. The increase is attributed partly to greater awareness and screening, a more expansive definition of the disorder, and parents having children at a later age, various studies show.
Mr. Trump and Kennedy have falsely claimed that the rise in diagnoses is isolated among American children — though diagnoses have dramatically risen in both older adults and children around the globe.
Despite his efforts to launch new research, Kennedy has provided Mr. Trump with no conclusive explanation for these increases. Mr. Trump began publicly pressing his health secretary on the issue last month during a Cabinet meeting when he asked Kennedy: “How are you doing on the autism research?”
Kennedy replied, “We will have an answer for you,” before Mr. Trump cut him off.
“That is so important,” the president pressed.
Kennedy’s vaccine agenda has been stymied, in part, by the White House’s infighting. Behind the scenes, White House officials have spent months waving Kennedy off his vaccine agenda amid a historic wave of measles infections.
With his Aug. 10 Oval Office signing, Mr. Trump made clear Kennedy’s vaccine agenda remains a top priority. The signing also came at a politically convenient moment: The Senate broke for a five-week recess, just after the White House secured the votes it needed for crucial confirmations of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Erica Schwartz and Attorney General Todd Blanche.
Kennedy misfires
Many of Kennedy’s claims so far on autism have not withstood scientific scrutiny. Last year, the health secretary said Tylenol use in pregnancy can lead to autism. A major new study in the peer-reviewed journal JAMA debunked the connection — a political stumble for Mr. Trump, who had publicly repeated the claim and urged women not to take the pain reliever.
Kennedy also offered that circumcision could be a cause during a Cabinet meeting in October. A large study published in August in JAMA Pediatrics found no such evidence. He said on The Tucker Carlson Show in 2025 that a hidden CDC study linked the hepatitis B vaccine to a 1,135% increase in autism. However, his remarks misrepresented the findings; the Belgian researcher he referred to later studied thimerosal exposure in vaccines and found no increased autism risk.
And Kennedy canceled millions of dollars in funding for research that was underway to search for autism’s causes, including potential environmental sources.
Pressed on details about the administration’s work studying autism, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya admitted that no conclusion had been reached during an interview on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”
“If you ask me, as a scientist, do I know why we’ve seen this rise in autism? I’ll tell you I don’t know the answer to that question,” he said Aug. 9.
Seated at his desk in the Oval Office the next day, Mr. Trump repeatedly made the connection between autism and vaccines just before signing the executive order calling for fewer childhood shots.
Appearing alongside Mr. Trump, Kennedy seemed intent on quelling expectations that HHS would produce results expeditiously. He told the president he was racing to find answers before the end of his term.
“Mr. President, you have told us you want answers. So do I,” Kennedy said. “We have just over two years to finish the work, and I know you’re impatient, and we are moving with an urgency that that deadline demands.”
While Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed there’s a link between autism and vaccines, he has not revealed which of the routine vaccinations he believes might be to blame, and he praised the polio vaccine as “amazing” during the White House event.
White House officials declined to answer questions about the status of Kennedy’s efforts to identify the cause of autism during a call a few hours later.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
In:
Get you up to speed: Sainsbury’s suspends facial recognition after customer accused of shoplifting | News UK
Sainsbury’s has suspended its live facial recognition technology at the East Dulwich store in London following an incident involving Matt Arnold, who was wrongly accused of shoplifting. The suspension comes after Sainsbury’s acknowledged that human error was responsible for the mishap, during which Arnold was stopped while attempting to purchase alcohol.
Sainsbury’s has paused the use of its live facial recognition technology at the East Dulwich store while it investigates the incident involving Matt Arnold, who was misidentified as a shoplifter. The supermarket’s head office acknowledged a human error in handling the alert, reinforcing that the facial recognition system itself has a 99.98% accuracy rate.
Sainsbury’s has suspended its live facial recognition technology at the East Dulwich store following a customer being wrongly accused of shoplifting, with the company stating the incident was due to “human error.” Civil liberties group Big Brother Watch has called for the technology to be scrapped entirely, citing concerns over its implications for customer treatment and accuracy.
What remains unclear — It is not specified how many customers may have been wrongly flagged by the facial recognition technology at Sainsbury’s.
Sainsbury’s halts facial recognition at London store after false accusation
Sainsbury’s has suspended the use of its live facial recognition technology at one of its London stores after a customer was wrongly accused of being a shoplifter.
Matt Arnold, 46, was attempting to buy alcohol at a self-service checkout at the supermarket’s East Dulwich store when he was stopped by two members of management.
After already scanning his items alongside his Nectar loyalty card, Arnold was told that he had been identified by the facial recognition technology in connection with an incident ‘earlier in the week’.
‘They came over and said I had to leave. The staff member said I’d been identified by the AI, and the cameras had flagged me,’ the comedy promoter told BBC London.
‘A shoplifter does not walk around with that much shopping, they don’t scan it through, they don’t put their Nectar card through.’
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Describing it as a ‘terrifying glimpse of the future’, Arnold warned that staff could feel forced to follow automated alerts without using their own judgement.
He added: ‘What upset me was thinking this is what the future could be – people just listen to what the machine tells them to do without thinking about the consequences.’
After being escorted from the store, Arnold later noticed an overhead CCTV screen that displayed his face inside a red circle.
In the days after the incident, Sainsbury’s head office contacted him to apologise, saying there had been a human error.
The supermarket also said it has now paused the technology at the East Dulwich store while it investigates what happened.
A spokesperson said: ‘We have contacted Mr Arnold to apologise for his experience at our Dulwich superstore. The incident was caused by human error, not the facial recognition technology.
‘Customers can be reassured that the Facewatch system has a 99.98% accuracy rate, and every match is reviewed by a trained manager.’
Technology firm Facewatch, who supply the technology and claims that it has a 99.8% accuracy, has also maintained that its technology was not responsible for the incident.
Is there a facial recognition camera close to you?
‘A correct alert was sent to the retailer, but was subsequently subject to human error in the way it was handled in store,’ a spokesperson said.
However, for Arnold, he claimed that ‘there are more people than me who have been caught out by this’ and mistakes are ‘going to happen’ as staff are ‘not being equipped to implement the AI properly’.
This comes after another Sainsbury’s customer, Warren Rajah, was wrongly challenged for shoplifting following a facial recognition alert in a Sainsbury’s branch in Elephant and Castle.
In June it was revealed by the British Transport Police that out of 330,000 commuters scanned with facial recognition cameras in London, only one person has been flagged as a criminal, and even that was a false alarm.
Silkie Carlo, the director of civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, has called on Sainsbury’s to scrap the techonology all together after claiming that it is ‘treating customers like criminals’.
‘Serious mistakes like this are inevitable when a national retailer does hundreds of thousands of ID checks indiscriminately with this sinister surveillance tech,’ she told the BBC.
WTX has contacted Sainsbury’s for comment.
Comments
Add as preferred source
What to Watch
Amazon prime - TV & Netflix
What to Watch
Love Sports
- Readers Digest
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

