TL:DR – Epstein’s Payments to Mandelson’s Husband Raise New Concerns
- Jeffrey Epstein transferred substantial funds to Reinaldo Avila da Silva, husband of Peter Mandelson, after Epstein’s 2009 prison release.
- Emails show da Silva requested financial assistance for an osteopathy course.
- Lord Mandelson, then UK business secretary, later advised Epstein to label the funding as a loan to avoid gift tax.
- Mandelson publicly apologised for his association with Epstein, acknowledging his poor judgment post-conviction.
- Communication between Mandelson and Epstein continued until at least 2016.
Jeffrey Epstein sent money to Mandelson’s husband after prison release, emails suggest | Peter Mandelson
Emails released by the US Department of Justice have revealed that Jeffrey Epstein made substantial bank transfers to Reinaldo Avila da Silva, the husband of former UK cabinet minister Peter Mandelson, following his 2009 release from prison.
This information has reignited scrutiny over Mandelson’s ties to the convicted sex offender, who had served a controversial 13-month sentence for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
What Happened between Epstein and Peter Mandelson
On 7 September 2009, Da Silva requested financial assistance from Epstein for an osteopathy course, detailing his fees and seeking a loan. Epstein agreed to wire the amount requested, and subsequent emails confirmed multiple payments, including a £10,000 transfer.
The correspondence illustrates a continuing financial relationship between Epstein and Da Silva, with Mandelson also involved, instructing Epstein to treat the funds as a loan to avoid tax implications.
When and where did this communication happen
The transactions took place between the United States and the UK, where Mandelson served as business secretary at the time of the initial email exchange. When Labour were in power around the time of Tony Blair’s involvement.
Peter Mandelson has acknowledged his past association with Epstein, expressing regret for continuing their relationship after Epstein’s conviction. He stated, “I was wrong to believe Epstein… I apologise unequivocally for doing so to the women and girls who suffered.”
Reaction and Fallout
The revelations have prompted public outcry, with renewed calls for accountability regarding Epstein’s network. Mandelson’s admission of his error reflects widespread condemnation of Epstein’s actions and those who associated with him. But, that’s just a smokescreen, what a PR agent advised him?
What the public want is for those associated with crimes with Epstein to be criminally prosecuted. That includes funnelling public money and taking bribes whilst leaking/sharing privileged information with a third party, who we now know was a Mossad agent.
Realistically, what will happen next to Mandelson
As investigations into Epstein’s activities continue, further scrutiny is expected regarding public figures linked to him. Mandelson has stated he will be transparent and forthcoming regarding his past association, while inquiries into Epstein’s financial dealings may unveil more details in the coming months.
In simple terms, nothing will happen to Lord Mandelson or any of those associated with Epstein because if it did, then the first and biggest culprit would be Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.